SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Honors Architectural Drawing
Class: Period 7
Daniel Burnham and John Root
Presented to: Mr. Mugno
PresentedBy:ZacharyJob
Date: November16th
, 2011
JOB 1
Although many famous architects may not be known by their name, usually their works
remain thus the architect is never forgotten. Unlike most, Daniel Burnham and John Root are
unsung geniuses of the architectural realm who advanced architectural practices immensely.
Acknowledged with the creation of the unspeakably glorious feat known as “The White City,”
otherwise recognized as the Columbian Exposition, both architects arguably accomplished one of
man’s most incredible achievements. Unquestionably, Burnham and Root are two of the most
accomplished architects in history for their innovations and structures.
While Root already was scrapping a living, Burnham still had no idea as to what to do
with his life. While Burnham had not received formal education in architecture, instead he had
learned from William Jenney (“Daniel Burnham”). Concerned for his son’s indecisiveness, his
father got a firm to pair Root and Burnham (Larson 70). Unknowingly, his father successfully
found Burnham a partner who would inspire him to become an incredible architect. After a few
commissions on houses and skyscrapers under Carter, Drake, & Wright (“Burnham and Root”),
both found they could start a business of their own. Under the leadership of Burnham, Burnham
and Root was created. Having already established themselves under leadership of another firm as
promising architects, some entrusted the two men with projects where both Burnham and Root
would deliver.
While both Burnham and Root still continued working with houses and private sector
structures to generate a constant income, important commissions came by which did help
establish the two businessmen. Soon enough, buildings like The Rookery, Randy McNally, and
the Equitable buildings all gave the group great fame (“Burnham and Root”(2)). Completed in
1888 (“The Rookery”), The Rookery gained the partners immense fame. Since the two were only
JOB 2
well known for their private works, such a building truly helped the group advance. Through the
use of concrete reinforced with steel gridding, the duo designed an extravagant yet open structure
where the entire main area was roofed by windows. Even Frank Lloyd Wright and William
Drummond admired the building so that they rented it out as a work place for extended amounts
of time (“A Rich History”). The structure was so beloved by all generations that it remains a
landmark, and it is the only high-rise structure to have survived from Burnham and Root. While
The Rookery was unique for its style, The Randy McNally building was an incredible feat for its
construction. Used as Burnham’s first experiment in building an all steel structure, this building
was leaps ahead of its time. Seeing that steel had not been common practice in any building,
bearing-structures had reigned supreme since the dawning of what they considered “modern”
architecture. Unlike skeleton framing created via steel, the outer walls of a structure would
actually serve as support for the building. At this time, buildings using this support were limited
height-wise as the structure had no means to remain stable at extreme heights. While simply a
test then, Burnham and Root had laid the foundation for a vast new method which would later
serve them and the world. Lastly, the Equitable building helped finalize how flexible Burnham
and Root were upon its completion in 1892 (“Equitable Building”). Joel Hurt had established a
competition to create an office that would satisfy a triangular property. In order to conquer the
space given, Burnham and Root developed a completely triangular design. Such a design was so
unique and liked by Joel that he granted the two the commission (Edge 100), and it was built by
1892 (“Equitable Building”). While the building was destroyed for the sake of a modernistic
movement (“Equitable Building”), such a building was an interesting innovation which was used
all over the U.S. following its creation. One example of imitating their creation is the well known
JOB 3
Flatiron building located in New York City. This building was a mirror image, and it was created
a few years later with an additional height bonus in 1902 (“Flatiron Building”). Overall, these
creations put Burnham and Root on the map as accomplished architects. While both Burnham
and Root were well established, two new commissions were up and coming that not only would
change their firm, but the world. Received nearly at the same time, Burnham and Root accepted
commissions to build what are now known to have been some of the first skyscrapers. Deemed
the Masonic Temple building and the Monadock, The Monadock was to be four floors short of
the Masonic temple building’s twenty floors. While this may seem small in the current society
where buildings reach above one thousand feet tall, at this time, these would be deemed the
tallest in the Chicago (“Masonic Temple”). While this seems simple, at the time, steel was not
commonly used in building construction. The reason for the lack of height in these buildings was
directly related to this fact. As explained before, bearing-walls had been used and were less
sturdy. Factually, the Monadock, the first building designed by the two was to be a hybrid
between a load-bearing brick structure, steel, and iron (“Monadock Building”). Used as a testing
ground for Burnham, he applied his teachings from William Jenny who was in fact the founder
of skyscrapers (“William Le Baron Jenney, Father of the American Skyscraper”). Pleased by the
simplicity and effectiveness of the Randy McNally Building, both Burnham and Root moved to
create what was to be known as the tallest skyscraper in Chicago, the Masonic Temple Building
(Larson 66). At the time, the tallest building in Chicago had only reached eighteen stories
(“Masonic Temple”). Comparable to William Jenny’s steel Manhattan Building built in Chicago
by 1891 (“Manhattan Building”), the Masonic Temple Building was immense and the first all
steel structure to reach twenty stories (“Masonic Temple”). As a testament to the effectiveness of
JOB 4
steel skeleton construction, while the Monadock required two years by 1891 (“Monadock
Building” (2)), the Masonic only required one ending in 1892 (“Masonic Temple”). Today,
skyscrapers have evolved and reached higher into the sky. While they may seem insignificant,
these steel structures are the very reason why larger and more complicated structures are possible
today.
Although it is not known widely, Burnham and Root were the incredible minds behind
rapidly erecting structures. Upon taking the challenge of what would be deemed the Columbian
Exposition, Burnham and Root had no idea how immense the challenge would be. The U.S. had
set their sights to out-do the Paris Exposition, and they wished to do so on the 400th anniversary
of Columbus’ landing; otherwise known as 1892 (Larson 92). Such a city would be the marvel of
the world which would have to out-perform any event which could possibly arise. Not only was
this a testament of U.S. architecture, it was a testament to how the free market had created a
thriving country. Not only was this fair a means to show off, but too that of wounded pride due
to the success of the Paris Exposition. Sadly, although intentions were good, planning for this
unimaginable event was horrid. Due to extreme indecision on the behalf of the committee
assigned to make decisions, Burnham and Root would only have two years to develop and
execute this plan (Larson 120). In these two years, they would have to populate 600 acres not
only with extremely intricate buildings, but with incredible landscapes and facilities to sustain it
as would a city of the future (Larson 220). While Burnham and Root had massive help with
landscapes and planning, the real genius of the fair was Burnham and how he developed a new
method for constructing buildings. Understanding that there was no time for concrete or stone,
Burnham and Root had to innovate. Unlike now, the mindset was that temporary structures
JOB 5
should be built out of conventional material. Breaking from convention, Burnham developed a
wood, plaster, and spray paint system. Simple as it sounds, a crew would erect a skeleton of each
building from wood. Once complete, each skeleton would be cast in plaster. At this time, spray
paint had yet to be invented. Understanding this would be the only effective way, Burnham
devised this method along with Francis Millet in 1892 so hoses could literally spray coatings
over each of the buildings (Larson 189). Not only did this cut costs immensely, but it led to
future building practices still in use today. Undoubtedly this idea revolutionized and cheapened
temporary architecture beyond what it had been.
From skyscrapers to office buildings to expositions, Burnham and Root revolutionized
architecture in vast ways. In improvising to create vast temporary structures rapidly and creating
one of the first steel skeleton structures, both architects opened other’s eyes to new and effective
ways to take architecture to unseen heights. Without question, these architects not only were
incredibly accomplished, but also changed architecture in previously inconceivable ways.
CITATIONS
“A Rich History”. The Rookery. n.p. 2009. Web. 11 Nov. 2011.
<http://www.therookerybuilding.com/building-history.html>.
Wilson, Mark, Stephen Porter, and Janice Reiff. "Burnham and Root." Encyclopedia of Chicago.
Chicago Historical Society, 2004. Web. 11 Nov. 2011.
<http://www.encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org/ pages/2581.html>.
“Burnham and Root”(2). Encyclopedia Britannica. eb.com, n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011.
<http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/85650/Daniel-H-Burnham/279249/Burnham-
Root>.
"Daniel Burnham." Essential Architecture. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011. <http://www.essential-
architecture.com/ARCHITECT/ARCH-Burnham.htm>.
Larson, Erik. Devil in the White City. N.p.: Vintage, 2003. Print.
“Equitable Building”. Emporis. Emporis GMBH, n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011.
<http://www.emporis.com/building/equitablebuilding-atlanta-ga-usa156>.
“Flatiron Bulding”. Emporis. Emporis GMBH, n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011.
< http://www.emporis.com/building/flatironbuilding-newyorkcity-ny-usa>
“History”. Monadock. n.p. n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011.
<http://www.monadnockbuilding.com/history.htm>.
Edge, Sarah. Joel Hurt and the Development of Atlanta. N.p.:Atlanta Historical Society, 1955
“Manhattan Building”. Emporis. Emporis GMBH, n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011.
< http://www.emporis.com/building/manhattanbuilding-chicago-il-usa>
"Masonic Temple." Emporis. Emporis GMBH, n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011.
<http://www.emporis.com/building/masonictemple-chicago-il-usa>.
“Monadock Building”. Encyclopedia Britannica. eb.com, n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011.
<http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/388810/Monadnock-Building>.
“Monadock Building”(2). Chicago Architecture Info. ArteFaqs Corp. n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011
<http://www.chicagoarchitecture.info/Building/1619/Monadnock-Building.php>
“The Rookery”. Emporis. Emporis GMBH, n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011.
<http://www.emporis.com/building/the-rookery-chicago-il-usa>.
Craven, Jackie “William Le Baron Jenney, Father of the American Skyscraper”. About.com.
Web. 11 Nov. 2011. <http://architecture.about.com/od/greatarchitects/p/jenney.htm>.

More Related Content

What's hot

Louis isadore kahn
Louis isadore kahnLouis isadore kahn
Louis isadore kahn
Vishal Kanthali
 
louis kahn
louis kahnlouis kahn
louis kahn
Sukhneet Kaur
 
Mies vs Wright
Mies vs WrightMies vs Wright
Mies vs Wright
kimberleyee95
 
Lectures; theory of architecture iv arch 246 i
Lectures; theory of architecture iv arch 246 iLectures; theory of architecture iv arch 246 i
Lectures; theory of architecture iv arch 246 i
ahmed osman
 
Chandigarh Capital Complex
Chandigarh Capital ComplexChandigarh Capital Complex
Chandigarh Capital Complex
shagundhiman
 
Late modernism
Late modernismLate modernism
Late modernism
Anant Nautiyal
 
Chicago School of Architecture
Chicago School of ArchitectureChicago School of Architecture
Chicago School of Architecture
Andhra University
 
Architect Frank Lloyd Wright
Architect Frank Lloyd WrightArchitect Frank Lloyd Wright
Architect Frank Lloyd Wright
Onal Kothari
 
Architect's and their works
Architect's and their worksArchitect's and their works
Architect's and their works
LipikaPandey
 
Modernism Design Period
Modernism Design PeriodModernism Design Period
Modernism Design Period
Azra Maliha
 
Peter eiseman works and theory on deconstructive architecture
Peter eiseman works and theory on deconstructive architecturePeter eiseman works and theory on deconstructive architecture
Peter eiseman works and theory on deconstructive architecture
kunal singh
 
F.L. Wright - Architecture
F.L. Wright - ArchitectureF.L. Wright - Architecture
F.L. Wright - Architecture
Mansi Pushpakar
 
Modern Design
Modern DesignModern Design
Modern Design
Alex Brown
 
Richard rogers-lloyds-london
Richard rogers-lloyds-londonRichard rogers-lloyds-london
Richard rogers-lloyds-london
Vishvendu pandey
 
01 Chicago School
01 Chicago School01 Chicago School
01 Chicago School
Douglas Vail
 
Norman forster
Norman forsterNorman forster
Norman forster
Romi Mewada
 
Louis kahn
Louis kahnLouis kahn
Louis kahnalbertrk
 
High-rise Presentation
High-rise PresentationHigh-rise Presentation
High-rise Presentation
Kaiserin Tania
 
New york five
New york fiveNew york five
New york five
TanyaSingh34
 

What's hot (20)

Louis i kahan
Louis i kahanLouis i kahan
Louis i kahan
 
Louis isadore kahn
Louis isadore kahnLouis isadore kahn
Louis isadore kahn
 
louis kahn
louis kahnlouis kahn
louis kahn
 
Mies vs Wright
Mies vs WrightMies vs Wright
Mies vs Wright
 
Lectures; theory of architecture iv arch 246 i
Lectures; theory of architecture iv arch 246 iLectures; theory of architecture iv arch 246 i
Lectures; theory of architecture iv arch 246 i
 
Chandigarh Capital Complex
Chandigarh Capital ComplexChandigarh Capital Complex
Chandigarh Capital Complex
 
Late modernism
Late modernismLate modernism
Late modernism
 
Chicago School of Architecture
Chicago School of ArchitectureChicago School of Architecture
Chicago School of Architecture
 
Architect Frank Lloyd Wright
Architect Frank Lloyd WrightArchitect Frank Lloyd Wright
Architect Frank Lloyd Wright
 
Architect's and their works
Architect's and their worksArchitect's and their works
Architect's and their works
 
Modernism Design Period
Modernism Design PeriodModernism Design Period
Modernism Design Period
 
Peter eiseman works and theory on deconstructive architecture
Peter eiseman works and theory on deconstructive architecturePeter eiseman works and theory on deconstructive architecture
Peter eiseman works and theory on deconstructive architecture
 
F.L. Wright - Architecture
F.L. Wright - ArchitectureF.L. Wright - Architecture
F.L. Wright - Architecture
 
Modern Design
Modern DesignModern Design
Modern Design
 
Richard rogers-lloyds-london
Richard rogers-lloyds-londonRichard rogers-lloyds-london
Richard rogers-lloyds-london
 
01 Chicago School
01 Chicago School01 Chicago School
01 Chicago School
 
Norman forster
Norman forsterNorman forster
Norman forster
 
Louis kahn
Louis kahnLouis kahn
Louis kahn
 
High-rise Presentation
High-rise PresentationHigh-rise Presentation
High-rise Presentation
 
New york five
New york fiveNew york five
New york five
 

Viewers also liked

Fashion central international june issue 2016
Fashion central international june issue 2016Fashion central international june issue 2016
Fashion central international june issue 2016
Fashioncentral
 
Coursera citizenjournalism 2015
Coursera citizenjournalism 2015Coursera citizenjournalism 2015
Coursera citizenjournalism 2015FOLAJINMI AINA
 
Reglas de netiquetas
Reglas de netiquetasReglas de netiquetas
Reglas de netiquetas
Información Virtual
 
Aron web solution
Aron web solutionAron web solution
Aron web solution
aronwebsolution
 
infographic inboundmarketing
infographic inboundmarketinginfographic inboundmarketing
infographic inboundmarketingDennis Veldhuis
 
Modelización de la adopción y uso por parte de los “Lead Users” de nuevos ser...
Modelización de la adopción y uso por parte de los “Lead Users” de nuevos ser...Modelización de la adopción y uso por parte de los “Lead Users” de nuevos ser...
Modelización de la adopción y uso por parte de los “Lead Users” de nuevos ser...i2tic
 
Taniya a64
Taniya a64Taniya a64
Taniya a64
Urban Buzz
 
Presentacion Cursos Formantia 2016
Presentacion Cursos Formantia 2016Presentacion Cursos Formantia 2016
Presentacion Cursos Formantia 2016
Formantia
 
cierre contable Normas internacionales 1
cierre contable Normas internacionales 1cierre contable Normas internacionales 1
cierre contable Normas internacionales 1elecodelcontador
 
DM Estimation on Meter Reading Control
DM Estimation on Meter Reading ControlDM Estimation on Meter Reading Control
DM Estimation on Meter Reading Control
Rakesh Dasgupta
 
Exposicion de instituciones financieras
Exposicion de instituciones financierasExposicion de instituciones financieras
Exposicion de instituciones financierasNoreidis Alvarado
 

Viewers also liked (13)

Fashion central international june issue 2016
Fashion central international june issue 2016Fashion central international june issue 2016
Fashion central international june issue 2016
 
Coursera citizenjournalism 2015
Coursera citizenjournalism 2015Coursera citizenjournalism 2015
Coursera citizenjournalism 2015
 
Reglas de netiquetas
Reglas de netiquetasReglas de netiquetas
Reglas de netiquetas
 
Aron web solution
Aron web solutionAron web solution
Aron web solution
 
infographic inboundmarketing
infographic inboundmarketinginfographic inboundmarketing
infographic inboundmarketing
 
Modelización de la adopción y uso por parte de los “Lead Users” de nuevos ser...
Modelización de la adopción y uso por parte de los “Lead Users” de nuevos ser...Modelización de la adopción y uso por parte de los “Lead Users” de nuevos ser...
Modelización de la adopción y uso por parte de los “Lead Users” de nuevos ser...
 
Taniya a64
Taniya a64Taniya a64
Taniya a64
 
snowboard brands
snowboard brandssnowboard brands
snowboard brands
 
Presentacion Cursos Formantia 2016
Presentacion Cursos Formantia 2016Presentacion Cursos Formantia 2016
Presentacion Cursos Formantia 2016
 
cierre contable Normas internacionales 1
cierre contable Normas internacionales 1cierre contable Normas internacionales 1
cierre contable Normas internacionales 1
 
Super Obama Girl
Super Obama GirlSuper Obama Girl
Super Obama Girl
 
DM Estimation on Meter Reading Control
DM Estimation on Meter Reading ControlDM Estimation on Meter Reading Control
DM Estimation on Meter Reading Control
 
Exposicion de instituciones financieras
Exposicion de instituciones financierasExposicion de instituciones financieras
Exposicion de instituciones financieras
 

Similar to Sample_HArchitecture

Chicago school (final ppt)
Chicago school (final ppt)Chicago school (final ppt)
Chicago school (final ppt)Kirubel Tilahun
 
One HSBC Plaza
One HSBC PlazaOne HSBC Plaza
Daniel Burnham
Daniel BurnhamDaniel Burnham
Daniel BurnhamNotchuck68
 
Daniel Burnham
Daniel BurnhamDaniel Burnham
Daniel BurnhamNotchuck68
 
(History of Architecture 2) Nov 2012 modern architecture
(History of Architecture 2) Nov 2012 modern architecture(History of Architecture 2) Nov 2012 modern architecture
(History of Architecture 2) Nov 2012 modern architecture
Carla Faner
 
Chapter 15: The Twentieth Century and Modernism
Chapter 15: The Twentieth Century and ModernismChapter 15: The Twentieth Century and Modernism
Chapter 15: The Twentieth Century and Modernism
Douglas Vail
 
THE ART OF ARCHITECTURE by Judith Johnson
THE ART OF ARCHITECTURE by Judith JohnsonTHE ART OF ARCHITECTURE by Judith Johnson
THE ART OF ARCHITECTURE by Judith JohnsonJudith Johnson
 
Modern Architecture - Art Decoration - Lecture 4
Modern Architecture - Art Decoration - Lecture 4Modern Architecture - Art Decoration - Lecture 4
Modern Architecture - Art Decoration - Lecture 4
Sewar Khasawneh
 
Johnson wax headquaters, architectural presentation
Johnson  wax  headquaters, architectural presentationJohnson  wax  headquaters, architectural presentation
Johnson wax headquaters, architectural presentation
Shahnaz Parvin
 
ARCH417Class12
ARCH417Class12ARCH417Class12
ARCH417Class12
Jennifer Burns
 
Architect Le corbusier and his works
Architect Le corbusier and his worksArchitect Le corbusier and his works
Architect Le corbusier and his works
Onal Kothari
 
Modern architecture
Modern architectureModern architecture
Modern architecture
Chandan Gupta
 
L4 Vertical Structure Pt2 2
L4 Vertical Structure Pt2 2L4 Vertical Structure Pt2 2
L4 Vertical Structure Pt2 2
chuhonsan
 
1. How new modern materials prompted changes in architecture in the .pdf
1. How new modern materials prompted changes in architecture in the .pdf1. How new modern materials prompted changes in architecture in the .pdf
1. How new modern materials prompted changes in architecture in the .pdf
aquastore223
 
Price tower
Price towerPrice tower
Price tower
Fathima Rizwana
 
Chapter 8 early modern architecture
Chapter 8   early modern architectureChapter 8   early modern architecture
Chapter 8 early modern architecture
PetrutaLipan
 
Fazlur khan
Fazlur khanFazlur khan
Fazlur khan
Dr. Ganesh Kame
 
Chapter 21 modernism in archtecture at mid-century
Chapter 21   modernism in archtecture at mid-centuryChapter 21   modernism in archtecture at mid-century
Chapter 21 modernism in archtecture at mid-century
PetrutaLipan
 
ARCH416Class16ModernHousesII
ARCH416Class16ModernHousesIIARCH416Class16ModernHousesII
ARCH416Class16ModernHousesII
Jennifer Burns
 
Philosophies of mies vander rohe
Philosophies of mies vander rohePhilosophies of mies vander rohe
Philosophies of mies vander rohe
Manish Jain Luhadia
 

Similar to Sample_HArchitecture (20)

Chicago school (final ppt)
Chicago school (final ppt)Chicago school (final ppt)
Chicago school (final ppt)
 
One HSBC Plaza
One HSBC PlazaOne HSBC Plaza
One HSBC Plaza
 
Daniel Burnham
Daniel BurnhamDaniel Burnham
Daniel Burnham
 
Daniel Burnham
Daniel BurnhamDaniel Burnham
Daniel Burnham
 
(History of Architecture 2) Nov 2012 modern architecture
(History of Architecture 2) Nov 2012 modern architecture(History of Architecture 2) Nov 2012 modern architecture
(History of Architecture 2) Nov 2012 modern architecture
 
Chapter 15: The Twentieth Century and Modernism
Chapter 15: The Twentieth Century and ModernismChapter 15: The Twentieth Century and Modernism
Chapter 15: The Twentieth Century and Modernism
 
THE ART OF ARCHITECTURE by Judith Johnson
THE ART OF ARCHITECTURE by Judith JohnsonTHE ART OF ARCHITECTURE by Judith Johnson
THE ART OF ARCHITECTURE by Judith Johnson
 
Modern Architecture - Art Decoration - Lecture 4
Modern Architecture - Art Decoration - Lecture 4Modern Architecture - Art Decoration - Lecture 4
Modern Architecture - Art Decoration - Lecture 4
 
Johnson wax headquaters, architectural presentation
Johnson  wax  headquaters, architectural presentationJohnson  wax  headquaters, architectural presentation
Johnson wax headquaters, architectural presentation
 
ARCH417Class12
ARCH417Class12ARCH417Class12
ARCH417Class12
 
Architect Le corbusier and his works
Architect Le corbusier and his worksArchitect Le corbusier and his works
Architect Le corbusier and his works
 
Modern architecture
Modern architectureModern architecture
Modern architecture
 
L4 Vertical Structure Pt2 2
L4 Vertical Structure Pt2 2L4 Vertical Structure Pt2 2
L4 Vertical Structure Pt2 2
 
1. How new modern materials prompted changes in architecture in the .pdf
1. How new modern materials prompted changes in architecture in the .pdf1. How new modern materials prompted changes in architecture in the .pdf
1. How new modern materials prompted changes in architecture in the .pdf
 
Price tower
Price towerPrice tower
Price tower
 
Chapter 8 early modern architecture
Chapter 8   early modern architectureChapter 8   early modern architecture
Chapter 8 early modern architecture
 
Fazlur khan
Fazlur khanFazlur khan
Fazlur khan
 
Chapter 21 modernism in archtecture at mid-century
Chapter 21   modernism in archtecture at mid-centuryChapter 21   modernism in archtecture at mid-century
Chapter 21 modernism in archtecture at mid-century
 
ARCH416Class16ModernHousesII
ARCH416Class16ModernHousesIIARCH416Class16ModernHousesII
ARCH416Class16ModernHousesII
 
Philosophies of mies vander rohe
Philosophies of mies vander rohePhilosophies of mies vander rohe
Philosophies of mies vander rohe
 

More from Zachary Job

677_Project_Report_V2
677_Project_Report_V2677_Project_Report_V2
677_Project_Report_V2Zachary Job
 
Sample_RWEngineering
Sample_RWEngineeringSample_RWEngineering
Sample_RWEngineeringZachary Job
 
Sample_HEngineering
Sample_HEngineeringSample_HEngineering
Sample_HEngineeringZachary Job
 
MultipleObjectDepthMapRec
MultipleObjectDepthMapRecMultipleObjectDepthMapRec
MultipleObjectDepthMapRecZachary Job
 

More from Zachary Job (7)

677_Project_Report_V2
677_Project_Report_V2677_Project_Report_V2
677_Project_Report_V2
 
Sample_RWEngineering
Sample_RWEngineeringSample_RWEngineering
Sample_RWEngineering
 
Sample_HEngineering
Sample_HEngineeringSample_HEngineering
Sample_HEngineering
 
Pong
PongPong
Pong
 
MultipleObjectDepthMapRec
MultipleObjectDepthMapRecMultipleObjectDepthMapRec
MultipleObjectDepthMapRec
 
fpres
fpresfpres
fpres
 
stigbot_beta
stigbot_betastigbot_beta
stigbot_beta
 

Sample_HArchitecture

  • 1. Honors Architectural Drawing Class: Period 7 Daniel Burnham and John Root Presented to: Mr. Mugno PresentedBy:ZacharyJob Date: November16th , 2011
  • 2. JOB 1 Although many famous architects may not be known by their name, usually their works remain thus the architect is never forgotten. Unlike most, Daniel Burnham and John Root are unsung geniuses of the architectural realm who advanced architectural practices immensely. Acknowledged with the creation of the unspeakably glorious feat known as “The White City,” otherwise recognized as the Columbian Exposition, both architects arguably accomplished one of man’s most incredible achievements. Unquestionably, Burnham and Root are two of the most accomplished architects in history for their innovations and structures. While Root already was scrapping a living, Burnham still had no idea as to what to do with his life. While Burnham had not received formal education in architecture, instead he had learned from William Jenney (“Daniel Burnham”). Concerned for his son’s indecisiveness, his father got a firm to pair Root and Burnham (Larson 70). Unknowingly, his father successfully found Burnham a partner who would inspire him to become an incredible architect. After a few commissions on houses and skyscrapers under Carter, Drake, & Wright (“Burnham and Root”), both found they could start a business of their own. Under the leadership of Burnham, Burnham and Root was created. Having already established themselves under leadership of another firm as promising architects, some entrusted the two men with projects where both Burnham and Root would deliver. While both Burnham and Root still continued working with houses and private sector structures to generate a constant income, important commissions came by which did help establish the two businessmen. Soon enough, buildings like The Rookery, Randy McNally, and the Equitable buildings all gave the group great fame (“Burnham and Root”(2)). Completed in 1888 (“The Rookery”), The Rookery gained the partners immense fame. Since the two were only
  • 3. JOB 2 well known for their private works, such a building truly helped the group advance. Through the use of concrete reinforced with steel gridding, the duo designed an extravagant yet open structure where the entire main area was roofed by windows. Even Frank Lloyd Wright and William Drummond admired the building so that they rented it out as a work place for extended amounts of time (“A Rich History”). The structure was so beloved by all generations that it remains a landmark, and it is the only high-rise structure to have survived from Burnham and Root. While The Rookery was unique for its style, The Randy McNally building was an incredible feat for its construction. Used as Burnham’s first experiment in building an all steel structure, this building was leaps ahead of its time. Seeing that steel had not been common practice in any building, bearing-structures had reigned supreme since the dawning of what they considered “modern” architecture. Unlike skeleton framing created via steel, the outer walls of a structure would actually serve as support for the building. At this time, buildings using this support were limited height-wise as the structure had no means to remain stable at extreme heights. While simply a test then, Burnham and Root had laid the foundation for a vast new method which would later serve them and the world. Lastly, the Equitable building helped finalize how flexible Burnham and Root were upon its completion in 1892 (“Equitable Building”). Joel Hurt had established a competition to create an office that would satisfy a triangular property. In order to conquer the space given, Burnham and Root developed a completely triangular design. Such a design was so unique and liked by Joel that he granted the two the commission (Edge 100), and it was built by 1892 (“Equitable Building”). While the building was destroyed for the sake of a modernistic movement (“Equitable Building”), such a building was an interesting innovation which was used all over the U.S. following its creation. One example of imitating their creation is the well known
  • 4. JOB 3 Flatiron building located in New York City. This building was a mirror image, and it was created a few years later with an additional height bonus in 1902 (“Flatiron Building”). Overall, these creations put Burnham and Root on the map as accomplished architects. While both Burnham and Root were well established, two new commissions were up and coming that not only would change their firm, but the world. Received nearly at the same time, Burnham and Root accepted commissions to build what are now known to have been some of the first skyscrapers. Deemed the Masonic Temple building and the Monadock, The Monadock was to be four floors short of the Masonic temple building’s twenty floors. While this may seem small in the current society where buildings reach above one thousand feet tall, at this time, these would be deemed the tallest in the Chicago (“Masonic Temple”). While this seems simple, at the time, steel was not commonly used in building construction. The reason for the lack of height in these buildings was directly related to this fact. As explained before, bearing-walls had been used and were less sturdy. Factually, the Monadock, the first building designed by the two was to be a hybrid between a load-bearing brick structure, steel, and iron (“Monadock Building”). Used as a testing ground for Burnham, he applied his teachings from William Jenny who was in fact the founder of skyscrapers (“William Le Baron Jenney, Father of the American Skyscraper”). Pleased by the simplicity and effectiveness of the Randy McNally Building, both Burnham and Root moved to create what was to be known as the tallest skyscraper in Chicago, the Masonic Temple Building (Larson 66). At the time, the tallest building in Chicago had only reached eighteen stories (“Masonic Temple”). Comparable to William Jenny’s steel Manhattan Building built in Chicago by 1891 (“Manhattan Building”), the Masonic Temple Building was immense and the first all steel structure to reach twenty stories (“Masonic Temple”). As a testament to the effectiveness of
  • 5. JOB 4 steel skeleton construction, while the Monadock required two years by 1891 (“Monadock Building” (2)), the Masonic only required one ending in 1892 (“Masonic Temple”). Today, skyscrapers have evolved and reached higher into the sky. While they may seem insignificant, these steel structures are the very reason why larger and more complicated structures are possible today. Although it is not known widely, Burnham and Root were the incredible minds behind rapidly erecting structures. Upon taking the challenge of what would be deemed the Columbian Exposition, Burnham and Root had no idea how immense the challenge would be. The U.S. had set their sights to out-do the Paris Exposition, and they wished to do so on the 400th anniversary of Columbus’ landing; otherwise known as 1892 (Larson 92). Such a city would be the marvel of the world which would have to out-perform any event which could possibly arise. Not only was this a testament of U.S. architecture, it was a testament to how the free market had created a thriving country. Not only was this fair a means to show off, but too that of wounded pride due to the success of the Paris Exposition. Sadly, although intentions were good, planning for this unimaginable event was horrid. Due to extreme indecision on the behalf of the committee assigned to make decisions, Burnham and Root would only have two years to develop and execute this plan (Larson 120). In these two years, they would have to populate 600 acres not only with extremely intricate buildings, but with incredible landscapes and facilities to sustain it as would a city of the future (Larson 220). While Burnham and Root had massive help with landscapes and planning, the real genius of the fair was Burnham and how he developed a new method for constructing buildings. Understanding that there was no time for concrete or stone, Burnham and Root had to innovate. Unlike now, the mindset was that temporary structures
  • 6. JOB 5 should be built out of conventional material. Breaking from convention, Burnham developed a wood, plaster, and spray paint system. Simple as it sounds, a crew would erect a skeleton of each building from wood. Once complete, each skeleton would be cast in plaster. At this time, spray paint had yet to be invented. Understanding this would be the only effective way, Burnham devised this method along with Francis Millet in 1892 so hoses could literally spray coatings over each of the buildings (Larson 189). Not only did this cut costs immensely, but it led to future building practices still in use today. Undoubtedly this idea revolutionized and cheapened temporary architecture beyond what it had been. From skyscrapers to office buildings to expositions, Burnham and Root revolutionized architecture in vast ways. In improvising to create vast temporary structures rapidly and creating one of the first steel skeleton structures, both architects opened other’s eyes to new and effective ways to take architecture to unseen heights. Without question, these architects not only were incredibly accomplished, but also changed architecture in previously inconceivable ways.
  • 7. CITATIONS “A Rich History”. The Rookery. n.p. 2009. Web. 11 Nov. 2011. <http://www.therookerybuilding.com/building-history.html>. Wilson, Mark, Stephen Porter, and Janice Reiff. "Burnham and Root." Encyclopedia of Chicago. Chicago Historical Society, 2004. Web. 11 Nov. 2011. <http://www.encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org/ pages/2581.html>. “Burnham and Root”(2). Encyclopedia Britannica. eb.com, n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/85650/Daniel-H-Burnham/279249/Burnham- Root>. "Daniel Burnham." Essential Architecture. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011. <http://www.essential- architecture.com/ARCHITECT/ARCH-Burnham.htm>. Larson, Erik. Devil in the White City. N.p.: Vintage, 2003. Print. “Equitable Building”. Emporis. Emporis GMBH, n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011. <http://www.emporis.com/building/equitablebuilding-atlanta-ga-usa156>. “Flatiron Bulding”. Emporis. Emporis GMBH, n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011. < http://www.emporis.com/building/flatironbuilding-newyorkcity-ny-usa> “History”. Monadock. n.p. n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011. <http://www.monadnockbuilding.com/history.htm>. Edge, Sarah. Joel Hurt and the Development of Atlanta. N.p.:Atlanta Historical Society, 1955 “Manhattan Building”. Emporis. Emporis GMBH, n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011. < http://www.emporis.com/building/manhattanbuilding-chicago-il-usa> "Masonic Temple." Emporis. Emporis GMBH, n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011. <http://www.emporis.com/building/masonictemple-chicago-il-usa>. “Monadock Building”. Encyclopedia Britannica. eb.com, n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/388810/Monadnock-Building>. “Monadock Building”(2). Chicago Architecture Info. ArteFaqs Corp. n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011 <http://www.chicagoarchitecture.info/Building/1619/Monadnock-Building.php> “The Rookery”. Emporis. Emporis GMBH, n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2011. <http://www.emporis.com/building/the-rookery-chicago-il-usa>. Craven, Jackie “William Le Baron Jenney, Father of the American Skyscraper”. About.com. Web. 11 Nov. 2011. <http://architecture.about.com/od/greatarchitects/p/jenney.htm>.