Running head: H. R. 312 1 H.R. 312 “The Mars Exploration Act” Kahlib J. Fischer February 11, 2015 PADM 550-B01 Dr. Kahlib Fischer H.R. 312 2 Defining the Problem Space exploration has been limited since the moon landing to space station visits and the deployment of the Hubble telescope and satellites (2015). In 2012, President Obama signed into law H.R. 312, “The Mars Exploration Act” (2012). This bill provides funding for the development and deployment of: 1) the “rovers”; 2) deep space transportation for humans; and 3) laboratory and housing facilities on Mars (Robinson & Smith, 2012). May Biblical guidelines: Of course, the Bible says nothing about space exploration. Government is charged primarily with protecting the inalienable rights of its citizens (Fischer). HR 312 does not violate these rights. The Biblical notion of “sphere sovereignty” implies that there are other spheres of society, such as non-profits and industry, which might be considered as participants in space exploration (Monsma, 2008). In the past, space exploration has been linked to national defense, for fear that other nations would gain the upper-hand in space and use that advantage against American citizens (Neuhaus, 2012). Since government has a divine mandate to protect its citizens, space exploration might be supported. Constitutional guidelines: The “common defense” portion of the preamble supports passage of this bill. Article 1 section 8 provides further points of support: the promotion of science and progress, the development of a sound military, and the regulation of commerce with foreign nations. Can Political Feasibility: Generally, the public favors further mars exploration and colonization (Smith, 2014). The passage of the bill was largely bi-partisan, but a significant Republican minority tried to block passage arguing that the funding was not present for the bill and that the H.R. 312 3 President was merely doing this to distract from criticism of his health care legislation and other scandals (Neuhaus, 2012). Since passage, some experts have argued that Mars colonization is not obtainable as NASA is currently constructed and has argued for either repeal of HR 312 or significant modification (Richards, 2015). Financial feasibility: Total cost of the bill was estimated at $20.5 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office (“H.R. 312”). At the time of passage, Democrats and Republicans were grappling with the debt ceiling crisis (Barnes, 2011). Practical feasibility: The bill was set up to fund NASA efforts for Mars exploration over 20 years. The major challenge was the development of sufficiently fast and safe space travel for humans (Geyer, 2012). Rovers have been sent to Mars, so, in effect, Phase 1 has been achieved. Significant challenges exist for phases 2 and 3, however, as NASA grapples with developing the proper t.