Rúbrica para evaluar proyecto

1. Assessment
Insufficient
consolidation
1
Medium knowledge
2
Good learning
3
Excellent learning
4 Numerical
notation
Group work Difficulty for creating
the groups and
insufficient
participation.
The groups have been
created naturally.
All the students have
not taken part in the
same way.
The groups have been
created naturally.
The taking part has
been appropriate.
The groups have been created
naturally.
The taking part has been
appropriate.
Good distribution of the tasks to
elaborate.
Excellent work atmosphere.
Material
development
It has been done just
partially. The tasks have been
completely
developed.
The quality of the
elaborated materials
is not very good..
The tasks have been
completely developed.
The quality of the
elaborated materials is
appropriate.
The tasks have been completely
developed.
The quality of the elaborated
materials is appropriate.
In the materials students have
included some resources not
suggested that have been very
useful for the excellent

2. development of the tasks.
Results’ report The tasks have not
meet the expected
criteria.
The tasks can be
realised with the
suggested processes.
The report has not
been clear enough and
coherent.
The processes have
been appropriate for
the suggested tasks.
The report has been
clear enough and
sufficient.
The report has been
presented between all
the members of the
group.
The processes have been very
appropriate for the suggested
tasks.
The report has been clear enough
and sufficient.
The report has been presented
between all the members of the
group.
The report was attractive for the
rest of the members of the class.

3. Use of resources It was not appropriate
and all of them have
not been used.
All the suggested
resources have been
used.
They have not studied
in depth the suggested
resources.
The tasks have not
been developed
completely.
All the suggested
resources have been
used.
They have studied in
depth the suggested
resources.
The tasks have been
developed completely.
All the suggested resources have
been used.
They have studied in depth the
suggested resources.
The tasks have been developed
completely.
They have worked in depth in all
the aspects using even additonal
resources.
ICT’s
commandment There is a lack of
control of them.
Poor knowledge of
Microsoft Word and
Power Point.
Limited knowledge of
the computer
programmes needed.
Not very good result
due to the lacks.
Good commandment
of the ICT that should
been used in the
exercise.
Appropriate result for
the required tasks.
Good commandment of the ICT
that should been used in the
exercise.
Appropriate result for the required
tasks.
Good materials, result of the
correct commandment of the
tools.
Attractive presentation, with
several elements of difficulty.

4. Formal aspects
The report of the works
is not appropriate and
does not meet the
minimum criteria.
The explanation in the
classroom was
deficient.
The report of the
works meets the
minimum criteria.
The report includes a
bibliography not very
well organised.
The presentation of
the report is modest.
The report of the
works meets the
minimum criteria.
The report includes a
well organised
bibliography.
The general
presentation of the
report is suitable.
The report of the works meets the
minimum criteria.
The report includes a well
organised bibliography.
The sources are correctly
mentioned, making easy their
location.
The general presentation of the
report is highly suitable.
Estimate rank:
Insufficient consolidation Médium knowledge Good learning Excellent learning
PUNCTUATION 6-11 12-17 18-23 24