This document provides an evaluation criteria for geography and history courses. It evaluates students based on three areas: contents (40%), procedures (40%), and attitude (20%). Contents evaluates a student's knowledge of course theory. Procedures assesses exercises related to history techniques, such as text commentary. Attitude considers a student's interest, participation in activities, and completion of compulsory works. A rubric is also provided to grade students on various components like contents organization, language difficulty, exercise understandability, and explanation clarity. The goal is to provide comprehensive evaluations of students' knowledge, skills, and engagement in the course material.

1. GEOGRAPHY AND HISTORY DEPARTMENT
Teacher: Maite Fresnillo
Document 5: Evaluation
We do not do one exam per unit, but for per term, in which the evaluation criteria are
the following:
 Contents (40 per cent)- Theory knowledge
 Procedures (40 per cent) – Exercises related to History techniques, this is, text
commentary in this level (in other levels in which we can work the programme
with more flexibility, we would include other kind of exercises as well).
 Attitude (20 per cent)- In this we take into account the interest of students,
their degree of taking part in the activities and the works done, mainly those
that are compulsory, for instance, one text commentary per unit.
Rubric model:
Contents
-Difficult to
understand
-Messy
materials
-Easy to
understand
-Disorganised
-Easy to
understand
-Organised
-Interesting
additional
materials
-Very clear and
easy to
understand
-Well organised
-Excellent
additional
materials
Language
-Very difficult
-Not enough
worked
-Difficult
-Quite well
worked
-Not very
difficult
-Worked enough
-Not very
difficult
-Cristal clear
after
explanations
Exercises
-Impossible to
understand
-Not related to
the unit
-Irrelevant
contents
-Difficult to
understand
-Too many items
to work
-Quire related to
the contents
-Easy to
understand
-Working in
groups makes
the task easier
-Relevant
contents for the
unit
-Easy to
understand
-Shared in
groups reduces
the load of work
-Interesting for
understanding
and
summarising the
unit
Explanations
-Not enough
-Too
complicated and
difficult to
follow
-Enough
-Complicate and
not easy to
follow
-Good enough
-Easy to follow
-Doubts enough
clarified
-Very good
-Easy to follow
-All doubts
solved
-Additional
materials for
understanding
My work -Very poor -Poor -Good enough -Very good
-Participative