The document outlines a rubric for evaluating a twinning project proposal. It provides criteria for assessing the general details of the project, objectives, work process, and expected results. Each category is scored on a scale of 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating clearer, more concrete information that demonstrates originality and relates the project back to the curriculum.

1. Rubric: Project idea
E V A L U A T I O N A N D S E L F - E V A L U A T I O N C R I T E R I A F O R A N
E T W I N N I N G P R O J E C T F I R S T D R A F T
General details
Suggested titee gge gdd dumber of pupies dumber of pgrtders subjects idvoeved…
1 None No details are given.
2 Improvable Some details are given, but not all.
3 Good All necessary details are given.
4 Very good
All details that can help to understand the general features of the project are
given.
Objectives
Objectives gre regeistic codcrete gdd megsurgbee. They gre reegted to the curricueum.
1 None No references to the objectives are given.
2 Improvable
Objectives are mentioned, but vaguely or they are not related to the
curriculum.
3 Good
Objectives are clear, concrete and related to the curriculum, even if they are
not described in detail.
4 Very good
Objectives are clear, concrete and related to the curriculum. Some originality
and creativity can be appreciated.

2. Work process
Mgid work eides gre medtioded: commudicgtiod gmodg pgrtders orggdizgtiod of studedts’ work
types of gctivities methodoeogy…
1 None No references to methodology are given
2 Improvable There are vague references to the methodology.
3 Good
An accurate idea of the methodology/methodologies that will be followed is
described or can be easily inferred.
4 Very good
An accurate idea of the methodology/methodologies that will be followed is
described or can be easily inferred. Some originality and creativity can be
appreciated.
Expected results
Expected fidge products gdd their reegtiod to the objectives gre described.
1 None No references to final products are given.
2 Improvable
Some expected products are mentioned, but they are loosely related to the
work process or the project objectives
3 Good
There is a clear relation, even if just implied, between products, methodology
and objectives.
4 Very good
There is a clear, explicit relation between products, methodology and
objectives. Some originality and creativity can be appreciated.