Rubric Decision Making Processes Rubric Decision Making Processes Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Described processes and lessons learned during the team project 20.0 to >17.0 pts Excellent Reflection contains rich description with clear and appropriate examples. Demonstrates high-level thinking and reflection. 17.0 to >15.0 pts Good Reflection contains clearly described processes, substantiated with examples. Demonstrates some level of reflection. 15.0 to >0 pts Fair Reflection briefly described processes and lessons, with some examples. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Described steps used for making sound decisions 10.0 to >8.0 pts Excellent Met all requirements. Rich description with clear organization. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Good Met all requirements. Clear descriptions and organization. 6.0 to >0 pts Fair Met most requirements. Brief descriptions with some organization. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Described lessons implemented to make the team more productive 10.0 to >8.0 pts Excellent Met all requirements. Rich description with clear organization. Reflection is thorough and demonstrates high-level meta-cognition. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Good Met all requirements. Clear descriptions and organization. Reflection is in-depth and demonstrates some level of meta-cognition. 6.0 to >0 pts Fair Met most requirements. Brief descriptions with some organization. Reflection demonstrates low level meta-cognition. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Format 10.0 to >8.0 pts Excellent Submission meets the length requirements as specified within the assignment. Shows clear organization of content; appropriate and consistent use of titles and headers. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Good The submission is slightly outside page length requirements as specified within the assignment expectations. Shows organization of content; consistent use of titles and headers. 6.0 to >0 pts Fair The submission is not consistent with the page length requirement as specified within the assignment expectations. Shows some organization of content; inconsistent use of titles and headers. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Mechanics 18.0 to >16.0 pts Excellent The submission contains very few or no grammatical, punctuation, syntax, and verb-tense agreement errors. 16.0 to >14.0 pts Good The submission contains some grammatical, punctuation, syntax, and verb-tense agreement errors..