The document summarizes research on factors that influence marital success and satisfaction. It identifies three key concepts: effective communication, effective conflict resolution, and strong interpersonal commitment. Ten scholarly sources on these concepts are reviewed, finding that communication factors like self-disclosure and reciprocity impact satisfaction, as does forgiveness in conflict resolution. Commitment depends on personal, moral and structural reasons to stay married. Further research is needed to better understand how to apply these concepts to achieve marital satisfaction and reduce divorce.
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI)inventionjournals
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Humanities and Social Science. IJHSSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Humanities and Social Science, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online
Brennan, Niamh M., Merkl-Davies, Doris M., and Beelitz, Annika [2013] Dialogi...Prof Niamh M. Brennan
We conceptualise CSR communication as a process of reciprocal influence between organisations and their audiences. We use an illustrative case study in the form of a conflict between firms and a powerful stakeholder which is played out in a series of 20 press releases over a two-month period to develop a framework of analysis based on insights from linguistics. It focuses on three aspects of dialogism, namely (i) turn-taking (co-operating in a conversation by responding to the other party), (ii) inter-party moves (the nature and type of interaction action characterising a turn i.e., denial, apology, excuse), and (iii) intertextuality (the intensity and quality of verbal interaction between the parties). We address the question: What is the nature and type of verbal interactions between the parties? First we examine (a) whether the parties verbally interact and then (b) whether the parties listen to each other.
We find evidence of dialogism suggesting that CSR communication is an interactive process which has to be understood as a function of the power relations between a firm and a specific stakeholder. Also, we find evidence of intertextuality in the press releases by the six firms which engage in verbal interaction with the stakeholder. We interpret this as linguistic evidence of isomorphic processes relating to CSR practices resulting from the pressure exerted by a powerful stakeholder. The lack of response by ten firms that fail to issue press releases suggests a strategy of ‘watch-and-wait’ with respect to the outcome of the conflict.
Jakari Griffith - An Examination of Interracial ContactJakari Griffith
He has a consistent presence in variety of academic conferences worldwide dealing with leadership development and positive employment channelization. Dr. Jakari Griffith believes in all round student development and is quite a popular teacher among his pupils for his highly sociable nature and philanthropic actions
Evaluating and Measuring the Effects of Public RelationsNosdaComunicacao
Apresentação do Professor Doutor James Grunig, sobre avaliação e mensuração de resultados em comunicação corporativa, durante a Série Encontros de Comunicação Corporativa da Abracom, no dia 06 de agosto de 2009
Positive Expectations in the Early Years of Marriage Should C.docxChantellPantoja184
Positive Expectations in the Early Years of Marriage: Should Couples
Expect the Best or Brace for the Worst?
James K. McNulty
The Ohio State University
Benjamin R. Karney
University of Florida
The current study examined whether the effects of positive expectations on changes in marital satisfac-
tion over the first 4 years of marriage were moderated by the nature of spouses’ interaction behaviors and
relationship attributions. Consistent with predictions, when spouses’ skills were most positive, positive
expectations predicted more stable satisfaction over time whereas less positive expectations predicted
steeper declines. Alternatively, when spouses’ skills were most negative, positive expectations predicted
steeper declines in satisfaction over time whereas less positive expectations predicted more stable
satisfaction. Thus, in contrast to the idea that expectations in the early years of marriage exert main
effects on satisfaction, the current findings suggest that the effects of expectations interact with the skills
partners bring to their relationships.
Things become better when you expect the best instead of the worst.
—Norman Vincent Peale, The Power of Positive Thinking (1952)
Blessed is he who expects nothing, for he shall never be disappointed.
—Alexander Pope, Letter to Gay (1727; as cited in Bartlett & Dole,
1919/2000)
Although they lived centuries apart, poet Alexander Pope (see
Bartlett & Dole, 1919/2000) and motivational writer Norman
Vincent Peale (1952) agreed that what people expect to receive
affects how they evaluate what they actually receive. The authors
differ, however, in how they described the nature of this effect.
According to Peale, expectations inspire outcomes that are consis-
tent with those expectations. Thus, he argued that positive expec-
tations should be cultivated because they direct people toward
positive outcomes. According to Pope, however, any expectations
leave people vulnerable to disappointment should they fail to
be met. Thus, he argued that positive expectations should be
avoided because they increase the likelihood of experiencing
disappointments.
The difference between these two views mirrors an ongoing
debate within research on intimate relationships. Although studies
agree that what partners expect to receive in their relationships
affects their evaluations of those relationships (e.g., Baucom,
Epstein, Rankin, & Burnett, 1996; Downey, Freitas, Michaelis, &
Khouri, 1998; Fletcher, Simpson, & Thomas, 2000; Knee, 1998;
McNulty & Karney, 2002, Murray, Holmes, & Griffin, 1996b;
Stanley, Blumberg, & Markman, 1999), there is little consensus
about the direction of this effect. One line of research suggests that
positive expectations lead to positive outcomes. On the basis of
this idea, some authors have argued that positive expectations
about a relationship are necessary for developing and maintaining
healthy relationship functioning. For example, in one approach to
preventing marital distr.
This paper was written for my issues of interpersonal communications class at WWU. The research provides insight on areas of satisfaction in a marriage.
Example Research PaperMarital CommunicationMarriage is a.docxSANSKAR20
Example Research Paper
Marital Communication
Marriage is a sacred bond between two people. After the beautiful wedding and the amazing honeymoon, reality sets in. Are you really right for this person? Here is your test; you have to live with them for the rest of your life and be happy with your decision. How do you do it? Communication. Communication is the simultaneous sharing and creating of meaning through symbolic interaction (Seiler & Beall, 2008, p. 3). You and your spouse will see all sides of each other, the pretty angel and the ugly monster they can be at times. Conflicts are going to rise and you will have to know how to deal with them without separating. Results indicate that those who divorce experience a decline in psychological well-being (Waite, Luo, & Lewin, 2009). Therefore, communication is key to a happy marriage. Within this paper, you will find out about different attachment styles relating to marriage, marital conflicts, and how to deal with those conflicts. I will include information from studies performed as well as tell what I have learned about communication while researching marital communication.
Attachment Styles and Marriage
In psychology, there is a theory that explains the bond between an infant and its caregiver, Attachment theory. There are three different types of bonds. The secure style which includes a comfort with intimacy and lack of anxiety, the avoidant style which includes discomfort with intimacy and difficulty depending on others and last the anxious-avoidant style which has a desire for extreme intimacy but high anxiety (Dainton, 2007, p. 284). Dainton’s study of 68 men and 111 women with the average marriage length being 15 years and the samples average ages being around 42 years, suggests that the attachment style one had with their caregiver continues through life with one’s spouse in the form of relationship maintenance. Relationship maintenance is defined as the “behaviors enacted in order to keep a relationship in a preferred state or condition” (Dainton, 2007, p. 284). They were asked to fill out a survey about attachment styles and maintenance behavior.
The results of this study are that maintenance communication might be a central mechanism linking attachment and satisfaction (Dainton, 2007, p. 292). It was found that secure attachment style was linked to a positive and happier relationship. It led to a positive expression of emotion and better conflict management. The avoidant style saw relationships as a bad thing. They saw no rewards and viewed them as a way to be emotionally hurt. Therefore, they kept their relationship in a “back-off” state and kept their emotions to themselves.
Therefore, according to this article, the way one was attached to their caregiver can affect the way that one treats a relationship. If someone had a secure attachment then they are more likely to be willing to talk about their emotions as to someone who had an avoidant attachment who would not w ...
Predicting Marital Satisfaction among Indian Muslim Women: A Phenomenological...AJHSSR Journal
Societal stability and development depends on stable and secure families, thus societies need to
understand and foster marital satisfaction. This qualitative study is the first of its kind to consider marital
satisfaction among the particular socio-cultural ethnicity of Indian Muslim women. The purpose of this
phenomenological study was to understand the factors affecting the quality of the Indian Muslim women‟s
marital relationships. Semi-structured, face-to-face, in-depth, qualitative interviews were held with 27 Indian
Muslim women from Mumbai, India. The study analyzed the relevant constructed meanings that emerged from
all interviews and clustered them into themes in an attempt to reach an in-depth understanding of factors in the
marital satisfaction and experiences of Indian Muslim women, including trust, commitment, respect,
faithfulness, communication, companionship, positive relations with in-laws, forgiveness, shared values and
financial security. The analysis of the collected data in this study provides a rich description of Indian Muslim
women‟s lived marital experiences and an identification of factors that influence their level of marital
satisfaction. The conclusions of the study indicate that Indian Muslim women are generally satisfied with their
marital life. An analysis of the data collected provided the basis for future research on this phenomenon as well
as some implications for couples, Islamic religious leaders, and marriage counselors working with this
population.
Marital Conflict Correlates, Structure, and ContextFrank D. F.docxinfantsuk
Marital Conflict: Correlates, Structure, and Context
Frank D. Fincham1
Psychology, Department, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
Abstract
Marital conflict has deleterious effects on mental, physical, and family health, and three decades of research have yielded a detailed picture of the behaviors that differentiate distressed from nondistressed couples. Review of this work shows that the singular emphasis on conflict in generating marital outcomes has yielded an incomplete picture of its role in marriage. Recently, researchers have tried to paint a more textured picture of marital conflict by studying spouses’ backgrounds and characteristics, investigating conflict in the contexts of support giving and affectional expression, and considering the ecological niche of couples in their broader environment.
Keywords
conflict patterns; marital distress; support
Systematic psychological research on marriage emerged largely among clinical psychologists who wanted to better assist couples experiencing marital distress. In the 30 years since this development, marital conflict has assumed a special status in the literature on marriage, as evidenced by three indices. First, many of the most influentialtheories of marriage tend to reflect the view that "distress results from couples' aversive and ineffectual response to conflict" (Koerner & Jacobson, 1994, p. 208). Second, research on marriage has focused on what spouses do when they disagree with each other, and reviews of marital interaction are dominated by studies of conflict and problem solving (see Weiss & Heyman, 1997). Third, psychological interventionsfor distressed couples often target conflict-resolution skills (see Baucom, Shoham, Mueser, Daiuto, & Stickle, 1998).
IS MARITAL CONFLICT IMPORTANT?
The attention given marital conflict is understandable when we consider its implications for mental, physical, and family health. Marital conflict has been linked to the onset of depressive symptoms, eating disorders, male alcoholism, episodic drinking, binge drinking, and out-of-home drinking. Although married individuals are healthier on average than the unmarried, marital conflict is associated with poorer health and with specific illnesses such as cancer, cardiac disease, and chronic pain, perhaps because hostile behaviors during conflict are related to alterations in immunological, endocrine, and cardiovascular functioning. Physical aggression occurs in about 30% of married couples in the United States, leading to significant physical injury in about 10% of couples. Marriage is also the most common interpersonal context for homicide, and more women are murdered by their partners than by anyone else. Finally, marital conflict is associated with important family outcomes, including poor parenting, poor adjustment of children, increased likelihood of parent-child conflict, and conflict between siblings. Marital conflicts that are frequent, intense, physical, unresolved, and child relat ...
Unit Three Interpersonal Communication in ActionEric L. Mor.docxlillie234567
Unit Three: Interpersonal Communication in Action
Eric L. Morgan and Greg G. Armfield
What Is Interpersonal Communication?
Communication between a customer and a salesperson, a doctor and a patient, a mother and a daughter, two partners who are in a fight, two partners who are in love, two friends talking on a park bench who join in conversation with a third friend who stops by and sits down, an e-mail from a soldier to his girlfriend. All these scenarios are examples of interpersonal communication. Scholar Brant Burleson (2010) defines
interpersonal communication
as “a complex, situated social process in which people who have established a communicative relationship exchange messages in an effort to generate shared meanings and accomplish social goals” (p. 151). Burleson (2010) further explains that people form a communicative relationship when “the recipient recognizes the source’s intention to convey an internal state, and the source recognizes the recipient’s intention to interpret” (p. 152).
Burleson’s definition of interpersonal communication has several implications. First, Burleson’s definition is different than traditional definitions in that it does not limit interpersonal communication to that which occurs in a face-to-face relationship or a dyadic context where only two people are present. For example, interpersonal communication still occurs over e-mail and phone, and even the presence of other people does not halt interpersonal communication. Second, interpersonal communication is not always effective. In other words, communicators do not always have shared understanding about the intentions and interpretations of messages. This is what makes the study of interpersonal communication so fascinating. Interpersonal scholars are often interested in studying relationships, not because the communication is so good and harmonious but rather to gain an understanding of a problematic issue in a relationship. To learn more about these problems, scholars can focus their study on certain communication episodes such as conflicts, support messages, influence attempts, or expressions of affection. Third, to be in a communicative relationship does not require that one is in a close, intimate relationship. Interpersonal communication can include the study of public, short-term relationships where the interactants do not know each other well (e.g., a grocery clerk and a customer). However, interpersonal scholars have devoted extraordinary time to studying how people communicate in close, intimate relationships given that such relationships impact our well-being so deeply.
The goal of this chapter is to explore interpersonal communication scholarship in just one type of relationship—the development and maintenance of romantic relationships. Anthropologists and evolutionary psychologists argue that humans have a fundamental need for social connection and are compelled to form romantic pair bonds (Fisher, 1992; Schmitt, 2008). Th.
Implicit Theories of Relationships Orientations TowardEvaluMalikPinckney86
Implicit Theories of Relationships: Orientations Toward
Evaluation and Cultivation
C. Raymond Knee, Heather Patrick, and Cynthia Lonsbary
Department of Psychology
University of Houston
Implicit theories of relationships (ITRs) influence goals, motivations, attributions,
and behavior in romantic relationships. We developed a model of ITRs that draws
from social cognition, motivation, and achievement literatures, and derived concep-
tual parallels and hypotheses with regard to relationships. It is proposed that ITRs re-
flect the belief component of a larger system of motivations and goals that can influ-
ence the degree to which people are oriented toward the evaluation and cultivation of
relationships. Research on ITRs is reviewed with regard to how they moderate
well-documented associations between relationship perceptions and outcomes. Dif-
ferences between ITRs and implicit theories in other domains are also discussed.
Individuals have different beliefs about what makes
for a good relationship. These beliefs or implicit theo-
ries determine, in part, one’s goals and motivations in
relationships (Knee, 1998; Knee, Nanayakkara, Vietor,
Neighbors, & Patrick, 2001), much as implicit theories
in other domains have been shown to determine goals
and motivations in those contexts (see Dweck, Chiu, &
Hong, 1995, for review). Implicit theories of relation-
ships (ITRs), as defined here, are characterized by a
belief in romantic destiny and a belief in relationship
growth. Destiny belief is defined as the belief that po-
tential relationship partners are either compatible or
they are not. Growth belief is defined as the belief that
relationship challenges can be overcome. Theo-
retically, those who believe more (relative to less)
strongly in destiny attempt to determine the compati-
bility of their partner and the viability of the relation-
ship based on minimal information. They place a high
value on determining whether a relationship is meant
to be, and tend to diagnose the potential of the relation-
ship based on specific events. Those who believe more
(relative to less) strongly in growth are primarily inter-
ested in developing the relationship, and believe that
relationships grow not despite obstacles but rather be-
cause of them. Destiny belief is linked to attempts to
diagnose the status and potential success of the rela-
tionship, and growth belief is linked to attempts to
maintain the relationship.
Implicit Theories of Attributes
Implicit theories were first studied with regard to
traits such as personality, intelligence, and morality
(Dweck, 1996; Dweck et al., 1995; Dweck, Hong, &
Chiu, 1993). Research on ITRs grew out of Dweck and
colleagues’ research on implicit theories in these other
domains. Research has shown that implicit theories are
relatively domain-specific such that the particular the-
ories within a given domain (e.g., intelligence) most
strongly predict behavior within that domain (e.g., giv-
ing up on a challenging te ...
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI)inventionjournals
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Humanities and Social Science. IJHSSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Humanities and Social Science, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online
Brennan, Niamh M., Merkl-Davies, Doris M., and Beelitz, Annika [2013] Dialogi...Prof Niamh M. Brennan
We conceptualise CSR communication as a process of reciprocal influence between organisations and their audiences. We use an illustrative case study in the form of a conflict between firms and a powerful stakeholder which is played out in a series of 20 press releases over a two-month period to develop a framework of analysis based on insights from linguistics. It focuses on three aspects of dialogism, namely (i) turn-taking (co-operating in a conversation by responding to the other party), (ii) inter-party moves (the nature and type of interaction action characterising a turn i.e., denial, apology, excuse), and (iii) intertextuality (the intensity and quality of verbal interaction between the parties). We address the question: What is the nature and type of verbal interactions between the parties? First we examine (a) whether the parties verbally interact and then (b) whether the parties listen to each other.
We find evidence of dialogism suggesting that CSR communication is an interactive process which has to be understood as a function of the power relations between a firm and a specific stakeholder. Also, we find evidence of intertextuality in the press releases by the six firms which engage in verbal interaction with the stakeholder. We interpret this as linguistic evidence of isomorphic processes relating to CSR practices resulting from the pressure exerted by a powerful stakeholder. The lack of response by ten firms that fail to issue press releases suggests a strategy of ‘watch-and-wait’ with respect to the outcome of the conflict.
Jakari Griffith - An Examination of Interracial ContactJakari Griffith
He has a consistent presence in variety of academic conferences worldwide dealing with leadership development and positive employment channelization. Dr. Jakari Griffith believes in all round student development and is quite a popular teacher among his pupils for his highly sociable nature and philanthropic actions
Evaluating and Measuring the Effects of Public RelationsNosdaComunicacao
Apresentação do Professor Doutor James Grunig, sobre avaliação e mensuração de resultados em comunicação corporativa, durante a Série Encontros de Comunicação Corporativa da Abracom, no dia 06 de agosto de 2009
Positive Expectations in the Early Years of Marriage Should C.docxChantellPantoja184
Positive Expectations in the Early Years of Marriage: Should Couples
Expect the Best or Brace for the Worst?
James K. McNulty
The Ohio State University
Benjamin R. Karney
University of Florida
The current study examined whether the effects of positive expectations on changes in marital satisfac-
tion over the first 4 years of marriage were moderated by the nature of spouses’ interaction behaviors and
relationship attributions. Consistent with predictions, when spouses’ skills were most positive, positive
expectations predicted more stable satisfaction over time whereas less positive expectations predicted
steeper declines. Alternatively, when spouses’ skills were most negative, positive expectations predicted
steeper declines in satisfaction over time whereas less positive expectations predicted more stable
satisfaction. Thus, in contrast to the idea that expectations in the early years of marriage exert main
effects on satisfaction, the current findings suggest that the effects of expectations interact with the skills
partners bring to their relationships.
Things become better when you expect the best instead of the worst.
—Norman Vincent Peale, The Power of Positive Thinking (1952)
Blessed is he who expects nothing, for he shall never be disappointed.
—Alexander Pope, Letter to Gay (1727; as cited in Bartlett & Dole,
1919/2000)
Although they lived centuries apart, poet Alexander Pope (see
Bartlett & Dole, 1919/2000) and motivational writer Norman
Vincent Peale (1952) agreed that what people expect to receive
affects how they evaluate what they actually receive. The authors
differ, however, in how they described the nature of this effect.
According to Peale, expectations inspire outcomes that are consis-
tent with those expectations. Thus, he argued that positive expec-
tations should be cultivated because they direct people toward
positive outcomes. According to Pope, however, any expectations
leave people vulnerable to disappointment should they fail to
be met. Thus, he argued that positive expectations should be
avoided because they increase the likelihood of experiencing
disappointments.
The difference between these two views mirrors an ongoing
debate within research on intimate relationships. Although studies
agree that what partners expect to receive in their relationships
affects their evaluations of those relationships (e.g., Baucom,
Epstein, Rankin, & Burnett, 1996; Downey, Freitas, Michaelis, &
Khouri, 1998; Fletcher, Simpson, & Thomas, 2000; Knee, 1998;
McNulty & Karney, 2002, Murray, Holmes, & Griffin, 1996b;
Stanley, Blumberg, & Markman, 1999), there is little consensus
about the direction of this effect. One line of research suggests that
positive expectations lead to positive outcomes. On the basis of
this idea, some authors have argued that positive expectations
about a relationship are necessary for developing and maintaining
healthy relationship functioning. For example, in one approach to
preventing marital distr.
This paper was written for my issues of interpersonal communications class at WWU. The research provides insight on areas of satisfaction in a marriage.
Example Research PaperMarital CommunicationMarriage is a.docxSANSKAR20
Example Research Paper
Marital Communication
Marriage is a sacred bond between two people. After the beautiful wedding and the amazing honeymoon, reality sets in. Are you really right for this person? Here is your test; you have to live with them for the rest of your life and be happy with your decision. How do you do it? Communication. Communication is the simultaneous sharing and creating of meaning through symbolic interaction (Seiler & Beall, 2008, p. 3). You and your spouse will see all sides of each other, the pretty angel and the ugly monster they can be at times. Conflicts are going to rise and you will have to know how to deal with them without separating. Results indicate that those who divorce experience a decline in psychological well-being (Waite, Luo, & Lewin, 2009). Therefore, communication is key to a happy marriage. Within this paper, you will find out about different attachment styles relating to marriage, marital conflicts, and how to deal with those conflicts. I will include information from studies performed as well as tell what I have learned about communication while researching marital communication.
Attachment Styles and Marriage
In psychology, there is a theory that explains the bond between an infant and its caregiver, Attachment theory. There are three different types of bonds. The secure style which includes a comfort with intimacy and lack of anxiety, the avoidant style which includes discomfort with intimacy and difficulty depending on others and last the anxious-avoidant style which has a desire for extreme intimacy but high anxiety (Dainton, 2007, p. 284). Dainton’s study of 68 men and 111 women with the average marriage length being 15 years and the samples average ages being around 42 years, suggests that the attachment style one had with their caregiver continues through life with one’s spouse in the form of relationship maintenance. Relationship maintenance is defined as the “behaviors enacted in order to keep a relationship in a preferred state or condition” (Dainton, 2007, p. 284). They were asked to fill out a survey about attachment styles and maintenance behavior.
The results of this study are that maintenance communication might be a central mechanism linking attachment and satisfaction (Dainton, 2007, p. 292). It was found that secure attachment style was linked to a positive and happier relationship. It led to a positive expression of emotion and better conflict management. The avoidant style saw relationships as a bad thing. They saw no rewards and viewed them as a way to be emotionally hurt. Therefore, they kept their relationship in a “back-off” state and kept their emotions to themselves.
Therefore, according to this article, the way one was attached to their caregiver can affect the way that one treats a relationship. If someone had a secure attachment then they are more likely to be willing to talk about their emotions as to someone who had an avoidant attachment who would not w ...
Predicting Marital Satisfaction among Indian Muslim Women: A Phenomenological...AJHSSR Journal
Societal stability and development depends on stable and secure families, thus societies need to
understand and foster marital satisfaction. This qualitative study is the first of its kind to consider marital
satisfaction among the particular socio-cultural ethnicity of Indian Muslim women. The purpose of this
phenomenological study was to understand the factors affecting the quality of the Indian Muslim women‟s
marital relationships. Semi-structured, face-to-face, in-depth, qualitative interviews were held with 27 Indian
Muslim women from Mumbai, India. The study analyzed the relevant constructed meanings that emerged from
all interviews and clustered them into themes in an attempt to reach an in-depth understanding of factors in the
marital satisfaction and experiences of Indian Muslim women, including trust, commitment, respect,
faithfulness, communication, companionship, positive relations with in-laws, forgiveness, shared values and
financial security. The analysis of the collected data in this study provides a rich description of Indian Muslim
women‟s lived marital experiences and an identification of factors that influence their level of marital
satisfaction. The conclusions of the study indicate that Indian Muslim women are generally satisfied with their
marital life. An analysis of the data collected provided the basis for future research on this phenomenon as well
as some implications for couples, Islamic religious leaders, and marriage counselors working with this
population.
Marital Conflict Correlates, Structure, and ContextFrank D. F.docxinfantsuk
Marital Conflict: Correlates, Structure, and Context
Frank D. Fincham1
Psychology, Department, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
Abstract
Marital conflict has deleterious effects on mental, physical, and family health, and three decades of research have yielded a detailed picture of the behaviors that differentiate distressed from nondistressed couples. Review of this work shows that the singular emphasis on conflict in generating marital outcomes has yielded an incomplete picture of its role in marriage. Recently, researchers have tried to paint a more textured picture of marital conflict by studying spouses’ backgrounds and characteristics, investigating conflict in the contexts of support giving and affectional expression, and considering the ecological niche of couples in their broader environment.
Keywords
conflict patterns; marital distress; support
Systematic psychological research on marriage emerged largely among clinical psychologists who wanted to better assist couples experiencing marital distress. In the 30 years since this development, marital conflict has assumed a special status in the literature on marriage, as evidenced by three indices. First, many of the most influentialtheories of marriage tend to reflect the view that "distress results from couples' aversive and ineffectual response to conflict" (Koerner & Jacobson, 1994, p. 208). Second, research on marriage has focused on what spouses do when they disagree with each other, and reviews of marital interaction are dominated by studies of conflict and problem solving (see Weiss & Heyman, 1997). Third, psychological interventionsfor distressed couples often target conflict-resolution skills (see Baucom, Shoham, Mueser, Daiuto, & Stickle, 1998).
IS MARITAL CONFLICT IMPORTANT?
The attention given marital conflict is understandable when we consider its implications for mental, physical, and family health. Marital conflict has been linked to the onset of depressive symptoms, eating disorders, male alcoholism, episodic drinking, binge drinking, and out-of-home drinking. Although married individuals are healthier on average than the unmarried, marital conflict is associated with poorer health and with specific illnesses such as cancer, cardiac disease, and chronic pain, perhaps because hostile behaviors during conflict are related to alterations in immunological, endocrine, and cardiovascular functioning. Physical aggression occurs in about 30% of married couples in the United States, leading to significant physical injury in about 10% of couples. Marriage is also the most common interpersonal context for homicide, and more women are murdered by their partners than by anyone else. Finally, marital conflict is associated with important family outcomes, including poor parenting, poor adjustment of children, increased likelihood of parent-child conflict, and conflict between siblings. Marital conflicts that are frequent, intense, physical, unresolved, and child relat ...
Unit Three Interpersonal Communication in ActionEric L. Mor.docxlillie234567
Unit Three: Interpersonal Communication in Action
Eric L. Morgan and Greg G. Armfield
What Is Interpersonal Communication?
Communication between a customer and a salesperson, a doctor and a patient, a mother and a daughter, two partners who are in a fight, two partners who are in love, two friends talking on a park bench who join in conversation with a third friend who stops by and sits down, an e-mail from a soldier to his girlfriend. All these scenarios are examples of interpersonal communication. Scholar Brant Burleson (2010) defines
interpersonal communication
as “a complex, situated social process in which people who have established a communicative relationship exchange messages in an effort to generate shared meanings and accomplish social goals” (p. 151). Burleson (2010) further explains that people form a communicative relationship when “the recipient recognizes the source’s intention to convey an internal state, and the source recognizes the recipient’s intention to interpret” (p. 152).
Burleson’s definition of interpersonal communication has several implications. First, Burleson’s definition is different than traditional definitions in that it does not limit interpersonal communication to that which occurs in a face-to-face relationship or a dyadic context where only two people are present. For example, interpersonal communication still occurs over e-mail and phone, and even the presence of other people does not halt interpersonal communication. Second, interpersonal communication is not always effective. In other words, communicators do not always have shared understanding about the intentions and interpretations of messages. This is what makes the study of interpersonal communication so fascinating. Interpersonal scholars are often interested in studying relationships, not because the communication is so good and harmonious but rather to gain an understanding of a problematic issue in a relationship. To learn more about these problems, scholars can focus their study on certain communication episodes such as conflicts, support messages, influence attempts, or expressions of affection. Third, to be in a communicative relationship does not require that one is in a close, intimate relationship. Interpersonal communication can include the study of public, short-term relationships where the interactants do not know each other well (e.g., a grocery clerk and a customer). However, interpersonal scholars have devoted extraordinary time to studying how people communicate in close, intimate relationships given that such relationships impact our well-being so deeply.
The goal of this chapter is to explore interpersonal communication scholarship in just one type of relationship—the development and maintenance of romantic relationships. Anthropologists and evolutionary psychologists argue that humans have a fundamental need for social connection and are compelled to form romantic pair bonds (Fisher, 1992; Schmitt, 2008). Th.
Implicit Theories of Relationships Orientations TowardEvaluMalikPinckney86
Implicit Theories of Relationships: Orientations Toward
Evaluation and Cultivation
C. Raymond Knee, Heather Patrick, and Cynthia Lonsbary
Department of Psychology
University of Houston
Implicit theories of relationships (ITRs) influence goals, motivations, attributions,
and behavior in romantic relationships. We developed a model of ITRs that draws
from social cognition, motivation, and achievement literatures, and derived concep-
tual parallels and hypotheses with regard to relationships. It is proposed that ITRs re-
flect the belief component of a larger system of motivations and goals that can influ-
ence the degree to which people are oriented toward the evaluation and cultivation of
relationships. Research on ITRs is reviewed with regard to how they moderate
well-documented associations between relationship perceptions and outcomes. Dif-
ferences between ITRs and implicit theories in other domains are also discussed.
Individuals have different beliefs about what makes
for a good relationship. These beliefs or implicit theo-
ries determine, in part, one’s goals and motivations in
relationships (Knee, 1998; Knee, Nanayakkara, Vietor,
Neighbors, & Patrick, 2001), much as implicit theories
in other domains have been shown to determine goals
and motivations in those contexts (see Dweck, Chiu, &
Hong, 1995, for review). Implicit theories of relation-
ships (ITRs), as defined here, are characterized by a
belief in romantic destiny and a belief in relationship
growth. Destiny belief is defined as the belief that po-
tential relationship partners are either compatible or
they are not. Growth belief is defined as the belief that
relationship challenges can be overcome. Theo-
retically, those who believe more (relative to less)
strongly in destiny attempt to determine the compati-
bility of their partner and the viability of the relation-
ship based on minimal information. They place a high
value on determining whether a relationship is meant
to be, and tend to diagnose the potential of the relation-
ship based on specific events. Those who believe more
(relative to less) strongly in growth are primarily inter-
ested in developing the relationship, and believe that
relationships grow not despite obstacles but rather be-
cause of them. Destiny belief is linked to attempts to
diagnose the status and potential success of the rela-
tionship, and growth belief is linked to attempts to
maintain the relationship.
Implicit Theories of Attributes
Implicit theories were first studied with regard to
traits such as personality, intelligence, and morality
(Dweck, 1996; Dweck et al., 1995; Dweck, Hong, &
Chiu, 1993). Research on ITRs grew out of Dweck and
colleagues’ research on implicit theories in these other
domains. Research has shown that implicit theories are
relatively domain-specific such that the particular the-
ories within a given domain (e.g., intelligence) most
strongly predict behavior within that domain (e.g., giv-
ing up on a challenging te ...
Dyadic Coping and Attachment Dimensions in Young Adult Romantic RelationshipsAJHSSR Journal
ABSTRACT: Dyadic coping conceives coping as a response in which partners support each other
and cope with stress as a couple rather than individuals, but little is known of the factors that lead to
dyadic coping. The present study aims to explore the relationship between dyadic coping and adult
attachment. That is, to examine whether an individual’s attachment style is a predictor of their own
dyadic coping style and their partner’s dyadic coping style. Online, survey data was collected from 74
childless couples, between the ages of 18 and 31, who had been in their relationships for over 6
months. Overall, analysis showed stronger associations between dyadic coping and attachment for
females, with minimal associations for males. The results of the present study are supportive of the
existing literature, though provide opportunities for further research.
KEYWORDS: dyadic coping, coping, attachment, romantic relationships, APIM
8Controversy Analysis In-Laws’ RelationshipTuesday, October 2.docxevonnehoggarth79783
8
Controversy Analysis: In-Laws’ Relationship
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Among the world, the in-laws’ relationships become the most difficult one to be managed, especially for mother/ daughter in-laws relationship. In-laws’ relationship is the relationship between one’s spouse’s family members with the newcomers; there are three main in-laws’ relationship: mother/father in-law (parents in- law), sibling in-law, and children in-law. In allusion to the different in-law’s relationship, there are different variables affect each of them. People who have a hard time dealing with in-laws’ relationship directly influence the harmony of a whole family. In order to get a clear understanding of the in-laws’ problem, a family issue conference being held by a few credible family communication researchers: Carolyn M. Prentice, researches at University of Missouri. Christine Rittenour, researches at West Virginia University. Tim Dun, researches at Brock University. Yi Song and Yang Bing Zhang are research at Beijing Foreign Language University. They are here to attempt to answer the question of, what is the most effective factor influencing the in- laws’ relationship?
According to Carolyn M. Prentice’s research, she wants to find out “how in-laws are assimilated into the family group as newcomers (Carolyn, page.74).” As her result shows that the most troubling relationship is mother- in- law, and the main reason that each family has conflict with female newcomer is because the newcomer tend to break the original routine of the family. The family routine is the history of daily habit for a family. For instance, when you are going to have a family party or which place the family always goes together. When there is newcomer, the family routine is going to change or broke. The in-laws’ relationship even the family relationship are tied to how the newcomer or how family members response to the change. This change is also related to the ontological security of the family. People who married with a similar routine’s person tend to have less conflict with in-law’s relationship. For newcomers, those who accept the new family routine are more success when they deal with the conflict of spouse’s family. That is, based on Carolyn M. Prentice’s presentation there are two important factors which influence the in-law’s relationship, family routine and newcomers’ assimilation. People tend to have a harmony relationship and being assimilated more easily in the future when both the spouses’ family and newcomer try to accept the differences in both family routine. In conclusion, Prentice believes assimilation and family routine are the most important factors influence the in-law’s relationship.
Same as Carolyn M. Prentice, Rittenour also think mother in-law is the toughest relationship exists in a family, and she presents a different idea about mother in-law’s relationship. She finds that the expectation and satisfaction of communication pattern affect the relationship betw.
This chapter highlights theory and research that clarifies how communication establishes and maintains interpersonal relationships. Although all interpersonal communication episodes have implications for the relationships between participants, we focus on research traditions that specifically address communication’s role in the initiation, development, and maintenance of intimacy within personal relationships.
The subject of divorce has been the topic of multiple research s.docxsarah98765
The subject of divorce has been the topic of multiple research studies over the course of many years. Take a look at this model for relationship breakdowns.
Do you think this Vulnerability-Stress-
Adaptation
model has merit? Why or why not?
SCIENCE BRIEFS
Keeping Marriages Healthy, and Why It’s So Difficult
4
By Benjamin R. Karney
0210karneyBenjamin Karney is an Associate Professor of Social Psychology and co-director of the Relationship Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles. His research focuses on how marriages change or remain stable over time, and in particular how relationship maintenance is constrained or enhanced by the contexts in which it takes place. Currently this includes research on marriages in the military, funded by the Department of Defense, and marriages in low-income populations, funded by the National Institute on Child Health and Human Development.
He received the Gerald R. Miller Award for Early Career Achievement from the International Association for Relationship Research in 2004 and has twice been the recipient of the National Council on Family Relation’s Reuben Hill Research and Theory Award for outstanding contributions to family science. His textbook, Intimate Relationships (coauthored with Thomas Bradbury), will be published by W. W. Norton in January, 2010.
People rarely change their minds about subjects that are important to them. Those who favor gun control today are likely to favor gun control ten years from now, and those who vote for Democratic candidates today are likely to do so throughout their lives.
Yet intimate relationships, and marriages in particular, are the exception to this rule. After two people stand before everyone important to them in the world and publicly declare that they love each other and intend to remain together for the rest of their lives, everything social psychology has learned about the stability of publicly declared opinions suggests that these will be the most stable opinions of all (Festinger, 1957). Yet of course they aren’t. Despite the almost uniform happiness and optimism of newlyweds, most first marriages will end in divorce or permanent separation (Bramlett & Mosher, 2002), and the rate of dissolution http://bestofassignment.com for remarriages is even higher (Cherlin, 1992).
In most cases, this represents a drastic and unwanted change in a highly valued belief, a change that is emotionally and financially costly to both members of the couple. Even in marriages that remain intact, newlyweds’ initially high levels of marital satisfaction tend to decline over time (VanLaningham, Johnson, & Amato, 2001). How can we account for this change? How is it that marital satisfaction declines so frequently, despite our best efforts to hold on to the positive feelings that motivate marriage in the first place? And what is it those couples that maintain their initial happiness are doing right?
What couples that stay happy are doing right
Understandi.
2Running head FAMILY RELATIONSHIPSImproving family relati.docxrhetttrevannion
2
Running head: FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS
Improving family relationships to reduce crime rates (Rough Draft)
Melva B Parker
William Verronne
8/16/18
Improving family relationships to reduce crime rates (Rough Draft)
The scholarly evidence shows that family structure impacts on the crime rate in the society. Research shows that the lack of the capacity to be responsible parents when bringing up their children is a major cause of the explosion of crime in the society
. Problems with guidance and love during the early stages of development have adverse social consequences for the community and children. Family instability is a major cause of violence in the society (Ahangaran & Dehpahlavani, 2014). Therefore, addressing the root cause of crime in the society should involve improving family relationships. Promoting desirable family relationships plays a significant role in reducing crime rates in the society. This paper seeks to argue that improving family relationships helps to reduce the rate of crime in the society
.
The quality of the relationship between parents and children plays a significant role in the tendency of children to engage in criminal activities. Quality parent-child relationship
enhances the learning of taking control over oppositional, impulsive, and aggressive behaviors (Piquero, Farrington, Welsh, Tremblay, & Jennings, 2008). This helps in the reduction of disruptive behaviors and the long-term adverse effects on social integration. Quality relationships between children and parents foster attunement, which is a set of complex and dynamic patterns of sensitive mutual understanding between the child and the parent (Farber, 2016). This is an important quality in preventing future aggression that may lead to the engagement in violent and criminal activities.
Improving family relationships helps in preventing breakups in marriage, thus allowing children to benefit from the role of the mother and the father, which helps prevent future engagement in crime. Marriage breakup increases the risk of juvenile delinquent because children are left with emotional pain, which influences tobacco use, physical fighting, and weapon carrying
. However, with improved family relationships, children stay with their parents who inculcate the desired values and morals. The father and the mother both play significant, but different roles in the development of the attitude and character of the child. Research shows that positive relationships between the father and the child reduce the risk of arrest for adolescents, join a gang, and steal or damage property (Farber, 2016). Research also shows that improved relationship between a young man and the mother may influence him to turn away from crime
.
Quality family relationships play an essential role in rehabilitating and reintegrating violent extremists. Family serves as a pull factor in influencing violent extremists to disengage from violent and criminal activities. Families contribute.
Article From Conflict Management to Healthcare Teams Effectiveness 2017
Review Paper Power Point Presentation
1. Successful Marriage as a Function of Effective Communication, Effectual Conflict Resolution, and Interpersonal Commitment Rebecca Ellis Argosy University August 11, 2010
2. Abstract The prominence of divorce as a method of dissolving American marital relationships indicates the necessity of further research into the concepts that influence marital success. Based on prior research on marital success, three concepts were identified as influencing relationship success: Effective communication, effectual conflict resolution, and strong interpersonal commitment. Ten scholarly sources involving these concepts were located, reviewed, and compared and contrasted. The information gleaned indicates a need for further research into each of the three concepts in an effort to more intricately understand each concept and effectively utilize it in the marriage relationship in the pursuit of marital success.
3. Successful Marriage as a Function of Effective Communication, Effectual Conflict Resolution, and Interpersonal Commitment The frequency with which married couples dissolve their unions and utilize the option of divorce rises alarmingly each year. One way to reduce the social problem of divorce is by focusing on the factors that influence the success of a marital relationship. Researchers estimate that almost half of all marriages will end in divorce, even though many individuals view successful marriage as a worthwhile goal; therefore, the individual factors that lead to a successful marriage warrant investigation (Carroll & Doherty, 2003). Research indicates that there are at least three concepts that are vital to achieving marital satisfaction: effective communication, effectual conflict resolution, and a strong interpersonal commitment. Based on this replicated and verified information, it would appear to be advantageous to further research the role that these three factors play in the success of a marriage, along with the different aspects and features of each concept (Argosy University, 2010). To that extent, ten scholarly sources that deal with the subject of successful marriage, communication, conflict resoltion, and commitment were located. The sources are grouped according to concept and given a brief review below.
4. Communication In “Self-Disclosure and Marital Satisfaction”, Hendrick (1981) studied communication with a focus on self-disclosure in particular. This study “found a consistent positive relationship between self-disclosure and marital satisfaction” (Hendrick, 1981, p. 1150). The author also discovered that level of self-disclosure is a strong predictor of marital satisfaction and that attitude similarity is positively correlated with marital satisfaction. Hendrick also discussed the important issue of reciprocity of self-disclosure.
5. Communication Continuing the study of communication and taking the concept a step further, Rehman and Holtzworth-Munroe (2007) attempted to generalize to a diverse population previous research results that demonstrated an association between marital satisfaction and couple communication in “A Cross-Cultural Examination of the Relation of Marital Communication Behavior to Marital Satisfaction”. This was a cross-cultural study in which both positive and negative communication behaviors were researched. The authors discovered that marital communication does affect marital satisfaction in all cultures, but the connection appears to be strongest in Americans.
6. Conflict Resolution In “Forgiveness and Conflict Resolution in Marriage”, authors Fincham, Beach, and Davila (2004) studied “whether forgiveness in married couples is associated with better conflict resolution” (p. 72). This article discusses the implications of the erosion of good will between a couple and the importance of forgiveness in avoiding such erosion.
7. Conflict Resolution Building on the research described above and adding the aspect of a longitudinal study, Fincham, Beach, and Davila again collaborated in 2007 to author “Longitudinal Relations Between Forgiveness and Conflict Resolution in Marriage”. In this study, the authors stated that forgiveness is an essential component of conflict resolution. They also state, “conflict resolution is integral to a successful relationship”, and that resentment “may fuel couple conflict and impede successful conflict resolution. In contrast, forgiving the partner for the transgression is a potential means of providing closure with regard to a painful or disturbing relationship event and reducing the extent to which that event can intrude upon future interactions” (Fincham, Beach, & Davila, 2007, p. 542). This article points out the importance of conflict resolution to the survival of a marriage relationship, and the necessity of forgiveness as an integral component of conflict resolution as evidenced by a longitudinal study.
8. Conflict Resolution Lest we should begin to believe that infinite forgiveness is both essential and beneficial to a marriage relationship, McNulty (2008) presents an important consideration in “Forgiveness in Marriage: Putting the Benefits into Context”. This research article studied couple’s level of forgiveness over time and compared long-term benefits and costs of forgiveness. The author discovered an important distinction between frequency of engaging in negative behavior and frequency of forgiveness. McNulty determined that increased forgiveness by couples who infrequently engaged in negative behavior was beneficial to the relationship, while increased forgiveness by couples who frequently engaged in negative behavior was actually harmful to the relationship. In this second scenario, decreased forgiveness and decreased tolerance was beneficial. This is an important consideration regarding the assumption of the universal benefit of forgiveness in marriage.
9. Commitment In “The Conceptualization of Marital Commitment: An Integrative Analysis”, Adams and Jones (1997) conceptualize marital commitment. This article integrates previous literature in order to discern convergent themes regarding what relational commitment is and how it operates to stabilize intimate relationships. The authors distinguished between personal commitment, moral commitment, and structural commitment with explanations of each.
10. Commitment Byrd (2009) also studied marital commitment in “The Social Construction of Marital Commitment”. This author studied marital commitment in an effort to understand it, and researched how social positions influence attitudes toward commitment. Byrd also reviewed rational and practical views of marital commitment, including more modern views toward ease and availability of divorce and expectations of life-long commitment.
11. Commitment Supporting the above research and adding to it, Johnson, Caughlin, and Huston (1999) discuss personal, moral, and structural reasons to stay married, along with types of commitment and limitations to assessment measures in “The Tripartite Nature of Marital Commitment: Personal, Moral, and Structural Reasons to Stay Married”.
12. Commitment Adding a new dimension to the subject of marital commitment, Miller (1997) researched actual ways to foster commitment in “Inattentive and Contented: Relationship Commitment and Attention to Alternatives”. Miller researched the role that commitment plays in relationships and discovered that “satisfaction with, investment in, commitment to, [and] adjustment in relationships” requires inattentiveness to relationship alternatives; “even if the grass is greener on the other side of the fence, happy gardeners will be less likely to notice” (1997, p. 758). This article highlights the importance of commitment and pinpoints the avoidance of dwelling on attractive alternatives to the relationship as an essential method of fostering commitment. The author also stresses the importance of working at a relationship.
13. Communication, Conflict Resolution, & Commitment Stanley, Markman, and Whitton (2002) investigated all three key relationship dynamics in “Communication, Conflict, and Commitment: Insights on the Foundations of Relationship Success From a National Survey”. The authors studied both positive and negative interactions between couples, along with the way that these behaviors correlated with marital satisfaction and the potential for divorce. This article concentrates on behaviors and communication during conflict, the most common issues that couples argue about, and gender correlations to divorce.
14. Conclusion In conclusion, given that effective communication, effectual conflict resolution, and a strong interpersonal commitment were indicated in this literature review as being the prevailing arguments for the vital concepts that lead to marital satisfaction (at least in American marriage relationships), it would appear warranted to further study these three concepts in order to understand and utilize them in an effort to achieve marital satisfaction in American marriages. The role of self-disclosure in effective communication, the role of forgiveness and effective behavior during conflict resolution, and the types of commitment and ways to foster commitment in a marriage relationship all warrant further examination and research.
15. Research Question Therefore, the obvious questions to ask are: What makes communication effective? What is effective conflict resolution and how do I utilize it? And, how do I improve my level of commitment? These three questions can be condensed into one research question: What does effective communication, effectual conflict resolution, and interpersonal commitment entail, and how can I utilize these concepts to achieve marital satisfaction?
16. Further Research This research question is important in the effort to address the social problem of the prominence of divorce. It is apparent that some type of intervention is warranted in order to aid couples that are experiencing low marital satisfaction and who are currently considering divorce. Teaching these concepts and the ways to utilize them to premarital counseling couples could also potentially reduce typical marital problems and increase the likelihood of achieving marital satisfaction. This research question is also relevant to the current work being done on achieving marital satisfaction as it delves deeper into concepts that have already been identified as being vital to a successful marriage. A more thorough understanding of each of the concepts, along with suggestions on how to implement positive strategies that utilize effective communication, effectual conflict resolution, and strong interpersonal commitment appear to be warranted in an effort to reduce the current divorce rate in America.
17. References Adams, J., & Jones, W.H. (1997). The conceptualization of marital commitment: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1177-1196. Retrieved August 8, 2010, from Argosy University’s PsychARTICLES database Argosy University. (2010). PSY492: The process of research: Module One. Retrieved August 8, 2010, from http://myeclassonline.com Byrd, S.E. (2009). The social construction of marital commitment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(2), 318-336. Retrieved August 8, 2010, from Argosy University’s ProQuest database Carroll, J.S., & Doherty, W.J. (2003). Evaluating the effectiveness of premarital prevention programs: A meta-analytic review of outcome research. Family Relations, 52(2), 105-118. Retrieved August 8, 2010, from Argosy University’s SocINDEX database Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R. H., & Davila, J. (2004). Forgiveness and conflict resolution in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(1), 72-81. Retrieved August 8, 2010, from Argosy University’s PsychARTICLES database Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R., & Davila, J. (2007). Longitudinal relations between forgiveness and conflict resolution in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(3), 542-545. Retrieved August 8, 2010, from Argosy University’s PsychARTICLES database Hendrick, S. S. (1981). Self-disclosure and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(6), 1150-1159. Retrieved August 8, 2010, from Argosy University’s PsychARTICLES database
18. References Johnson, M.P., Caughlin, J.P., & Huston, T.L. (1999). The tripartite nature of marital commitment: Personal, moral, and structural reasons to stay married. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(1), 160-177. Retrieved August 8, 2010, from Argosy University’s ProQuest database Miller, R. S. (1997). Inattentive and contented: Relationship commitment and attention to alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 758-766. Retrieved August 8, 2010, from Argosy University’s PsychARTICLES database McNulty, J. K. (2008). Forgiveness in marriage: Putting the benefits into context. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(1), 171-175. Retrieved August 8, 2010, from Argosy University’s PsychARTICLES database Rehman, U.S., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2007). A cross-cultural examination of the relation of marital communication behavior to marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 759-763. Retrieved August 8, 2010, from Argosy University’s PsychARTICLES database Stanley, S.M., Markman, H.J., & Whitton, S.W. (2002). Communication, conflict, and commitment: Insights on the foundations of relationship success from a national survey. Family Process, 41(4), 659-675. Retrieved August 8, 2010, from Argosy University’s ProQuest database