The paper discusses the current and potential role of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) in anchoring economic reforms in the countries of the EU's Eastern Neighbourhood. It claims that it is too early to assess the success of the ENP in this sphere especially given that the actual progress of the ENP agenda has been limited. A review of the empirical evidence on external reform anchors confirms that the ENP shares some features with the EU accession process that has proven to be an effective mechanism supporting major economic, political and social changes in the countries concerned. The eventual ENP economic offer is meaningful and integration with the EU is getting stronger public support in several CIS countries and among their political elites. On the other hand several factors limit the reform anchoring potential of the ENP. This paper offers recommendations on policies that could strengthen this potential.
Authored by: Wojciech Paczynski
Published in 2009
This working document offers a conceptual framework for understanding the processes underpinning the external dimension of EU Justice and Home Affairs (ED-JHA). Practically, it defines how the export of JHA principles and norms inform the geopolitical ambitions of the EU, i.e. the use of space for political purposes, or the control and management of people, objects and movement. The author begins by investigating how the ENP reconfigures the ED-JHA, and then goes on to discuss various conceptual stances on governance, specifically institutionalism, constructivism, and policy instruments. To conclude he traces the evolution of this external dimension, emphasising, whenever possible, its continuities and bifurcations. Overall, the aim is to ascertain the extent to which conceptual designs clarify or advance our knowledge of the contents and rationales of the ED-JHA.
Authored by: Thierry Balzacq
Published in 2008
The EU has been one of the largest trade partners for so called Eastern Partnership (EaP) countries, namely Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. Commodity turnover of these countries with the EU vary between 30% and 50% of total, but their access to the EU market is less preferential than for many other neighboring countries. They trade with the EU on the basis of MFN regime, and five EaP countries, with exemption of Belarus, use privileges provided by Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) or the GSP+ or autonomous trade preferences (Moldova). With the launch of EaP initiative in 2009, relations between the EU and the Eastern European countries (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine) have received new impetus for development. The EaP offers upgrade of relations within three major dimensions, namely (a) the Association Agreement (AA), (b) Agreement on a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA), and (c) Visa Facilitation and Readmission agreements. The AA talks have been launched with all EaP countries expect for Belarus, and four of them have been involved in the DCFTA talks. Ukraine has progressed the most, as after five years of negotiations the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement with embedded DCFTA has been initialed in 2012.The aim of this study is to assess gains and losses that could arise from the DCFTA with the EU for the EaP countries, using information about EU-Ukraine DCFTA as model case for EaP regional trade cooperation.The focus of the paper is on non-tariff (regulatory) component of the EU DCFTA and potential implications of regulatory approximation. Also, current level of harmonization of EaP countries’regulatory framework with the EU acquis in the areas related to the DCFTA is analyzed.
Authored by: Veronika Movchan, Volodymyr Shportyuk
Published in 2012
This paper studies costs and benefits of institutional harmonisation in the context of EU relations with its neighbors. The purpose of this paper is to outline the likely forms of institutional harmonisation between the EU and its Eastern neighbors and provide an
overview of the methodologies that can be used in measuring its effects (costs and benefits). This paper serves as a background for two measurement exercises – one on benefits and another on costs – that are to be undertaken during the second stage of research.
Authored by: Veliko Dimitrov, Vladimir Dubrovskiy, Anna Kolesnichenko, Irina Orlova
Published in 2007
The paper discusses the current and potential role of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) in anchoring economic reforms in the countries of the EU's Eastern Neighbourhood. It claims that it is too early to assess the success of the ENP in this sphere especially given that the actual progress of the ENP agenda has been limited. A review of the empirical evidence on external reform anchors confirms that the ENP shares some features with the EU accession process that has proven to be an effective mechanism supporting major economic, political and social changes in the countries concerned. The eventual ENP economic offer is meaningful and integration with the EU is getting stronger public support in several CIS countries and among their political elites. On the other hand several factors limit the reform anchoring potential of the ENP. This paper offers recommendations on policies that could strengthen this potential.
Authored by: Wojciech Paczynski
Published in 2009
This working document offers a conceptual framework for understanding the processes underpinning the external dimension of EU Justice and Home Affairs (ED-JHA). Practically, it defines how the export of JHA principles and norms inform the geopolitical ambitions of the EU, i.e. the use of space for political purposes, or the control and management of people, objects and movement. The author begins by investigating how the ENP reconfigures the ED-JHA, and then goes on to discuss various conceptual stances on governance, specifically institutionalism, constructivism, and policy instruments. To conclude he traces the evolution of this external dimension, emphasising, whenever possible, its continuities and bifurcations. Overall, the aim is to ascertain the extent to which conceptual designs clarify or advance our knowledge of the contents and rationales of the ED-JHA.
Authored by: Thierry Balzacq
Published in 2008
The EU has been one of the largest trade partners for so called Eastern Partnership (EaP) countries, namely Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. Commodity turnover of these countries with the EU vary between 30% and 50% of total, but their access to the EU market is less preferential than for many other neighboring countries. They trade with the EU on the basis of MFN regime, and five EaP countries, with exemption of Belarus, use privileges provided by Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) or the GSP+ or autonomous trade preferences (Moldova). With the launch of EaP initiative in 2009, relations between the EU and the Eastern European countries (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine) have received new impetus for development. The EaP offers upgrade of relations within three major dimensions, namely (a) the Association Agreement (AA), (b) Agreement on a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA), and (c) Visa Facilitation and Readmission agreements. The AA talks have been launched with all EaP countries expect for Belarus, and four of them have been involved in the DCFTA talks. Ukraine has progressed the most, as after five years of negotiations the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement with embedded DCFTA has been initialed in 2012.The aim of this study is to assess gains and losses that could arise from the DCFTA with the EU for the EaP countries, using information about EU-Ukraine DCFTA as model case for EaP regional trade cooperation.The focus of the paper is on non-tariff (regulatory) component of the EU DCFTA and potential implications of regulatory approximation. Also, current level of harmonization of EaP countries’regulatory framework with the EU acquis in the areas related to the DCFTA is analyzed.
Authored by: Veronika Movchan, Volodymyr Shportyuk
Published in 2012
This paper studies costs and benefits of institutional harmonisation in the context of EU relations with its neighbors. The purpose of this paper is to outline the likely forms of institutional harmonisation between the EU and its Eastern neighbors and provide an
overview of the methodologies that can be used in measuring its effects (costs and benefits). This paper serves as a background for two measurement exercises – one on benefits and another on costs – that are to be undertaken during the second stage of research.
Authored by: Veliko Dimitrov, Vladimir Dubrovskiy, Anna Kolesnichenko, Irina Orlova
Published in 2007
This paper analyzes the costs of (partial) institutional harmonization with the EU acquis which countries of the former USSR are expected to conduct under their Partnership and Cooperation Agreements with the EU and European Neighborhood Policy Action Plans. The public sector will have to take an effort of the transposition and adaptation of EU norms, as well as ensuring that they are complied with. Yet, the major part of the adjustment costs will fall on the private sector, as enterprises will have to make substantial investments to comply with new product requirements and business practices.
In this study we used the method of extrapolation of average costs for CEE countries’ harmonization with acquis to estimate the potential harmonization costs for the neighboring countries based on internationally comparative macroeconomic indicators like sectoral and total value added. This involved estimating the EU pre-accession support for the CEE countries by main areas as a percentage of the total or sectoral value added, determining the expected degree of limited harmonization in the ENP countries and estimating “coefficients of limited harmonization”, which was subsequently used for adjustment of the estimated cost of full harmonization.
Authored by: Veliko Dmitrov
Institutional harmonization is an important part of European integration, and its effects are more far reaching than the effects of trade liberalization. In its policy towards neighbors (the European Neighborhood Policy, ENP), the EU puts a lot of stress on the desirability of institutional harmonization, at least in certain areas. In particular, the free trade agreements that the EU envisages concluding with its Eastern neighbors will involve substantial harmonization of product standards, competition policy and a range of other policies and processes. At the very least, the harmonization will have to focus on the areas that relate to improvement of market access, i.e. removing restrictions to trade, harmonizing product standards and the systems of quality control etc. But in order to implement the new standards and rules, the EU neighbors will have to reform many related areas, so that the harmonization will encompass the whole system of economic governance. Not only will such a revamp help attaining better access to the EU markets, but also (and probably more importantly) it will stimulate modernization of the neighbors' economies and bring much needed efficiency gains.
In measurement of benefits of harmonization we refer to two methods: one based on the computable general equilibrium (CGE) modeling of welfare effects of better market access, and the other employing a growth model to estimate the wider effects of European institutions on growth. The estimation of costs of harmonization bases on extrapolation of the analogous costs in other countries, in particular CEE. These costs include expenses by a public sector on introduction of harmonization measures, as well as private sector expenses and investments related to their implementation.
Authored by: Anna Kolesnichenko
Published in 2009
During the last two decades the CIS countries have received very significant amounts of technical assistance from international development organizations and bilateral donors. While this has played a positive and important role in the transformation of these societies, practically all stakeholders currently share the opinion that many problems have accumulated in the area of technical cooperation with CIS countries. This paper intends to outline these problems, analyze their underlying reasons - including the changing environment for technical cooperation in the CIS - and the interaction of the interests of beneficiaries, donors and providers in the process of implementing technical cooperation projects. The analysis suggests that a good understanding, recognition and coordination of the interests of all TC stakeholders and a reduction in the information gap between the various participants in the technical cooperation process are necessary for improving the effectiveness of technical cooperation.
Authored by: Aziz Atamanov, Roman Mogilevsky
Published in 2008
In recent years, the EU has assumed a greater role in dealing with security concerns
within the EU. In response to nation states’ decreasing capabilities to deal effectively
with problems at the national level, domestic policy fields such as asylum and migration
have been at least partially transferred to supranational responsibility (Scharpf, 2003;
Zürn, 2000). One of the issues that receives increasing attention at the supranational
level is irregular migration. Every year, an estimated 30 million people cross an
international border irregularly, of which, according to Europol, between 400,000 and
500,000 enter the EU. The stock of irregular residents in the EU is currently estimated
to be around three million (Council of Europe, 2003). In recent years, EU members
have come to the conclusion that they are no longer able to properly react to the
phenomenon of irregular migration on the domestic level and instead need to combine
their efforts regarding return policies on the European level. Measures against irregular
immigration thus became a focal point in the EU’s efforts to establish an ‘area of
freedom, security and justice’.
At the same time, the EU’s role in the outside world has changed. With the Eastern
enlargement, new regions and countries became neighbours of the EU. New
frameworks of cooperation, such as the Stabilisation and Association Process (SAP)
and the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) were set in motion to closely affiliate
neighbouring states with the EU (Emerson, 2005; Emerson & Noutcheva, 2005;
Emerson et al., 2007; Landaburu, 2006; Tassinari, 2006). The EU tried to assume a
greater responsibility in the stabilisation of the neighbourhood and sought to “promote a
ring of well governed countries to the East of the European Union and on the borders
of the Mediterranean with whom we can enjoy close and cooperative relations”
(European Security Strategy, 2003, p. 8). A major challenge in the EU’s efforts to
stabilise the neighbourhood was to find a proper balance with the internal security
concerns. Whereas the EU’s foreign and security policy was interested in advancing
regional integration and good neighbourly relations, the EU justice and home affairs
ministers were primarily guided by their interest in keeping problems out and the
external border closed.
This paper is concerned with an EU foreign policy instrument that is a case in point for
this struggle: EC visa facilitation and readmission agreements. These agreements aim
at fostering good neighbourly relations by easing the tight visa regime with
neighbouring countries in order to externalise a restrictive migration policy. By
elaborating on the EU’s strategy on visa facilitation and readmission, this paper aims at
offering a first systematic analysis of the objective, substance, and political implications
of these agreements. When was the link between visa facilitation and readmission
made? What are the target
CeDEM Asia 2016 열린정부 아시아총회가 한국에서 처음 개최되다Han Woo PARK
Please find linked the current Call for Papers. I kindly inform you another CFP during the overlapped period of the #DISC2016 in December. Feel free to submit a paper on your own. The first submission deadline is 30 June 2016.
The website update includes new information about keynotes, venue and fees.
www.donau-uni.ac.at/cedemasia2016
Denisa Čiderová: The Era of Science Diplomacy: Implications for Economics, B...CUBCCE Conference
The London-based Royal Society publishing the world’s oldest scientific journal in continuous publication Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (since 1665) identified science diplomacy as still a fluid concept that can be applied to the role of science, technology and innovation in three dimensions of policy: Science in diplomacy; Diplomacy for science; Science for diplomacy. In June 2015 the European Commissioner for Research, Science and Innovation Carlos Moedas reiterated the Royal Society’s dimensions of science diplomacy in his speech The EU approach to science diplomacy at the European Institute in Washington.
Terms “diplomacy”, “science” and “art” are marked by variability of interpretations, with the French painter G. Braque pointing at one of possible links between science and art: « L’Art est fait pour trabler, la Science rassure. » (Notebooks: Day and Night, 1952 quoted in PODOLAN, 2014, p. 745); pivotal shift in the perception (of the complexity) of diplomacy is accentuated by editors of The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy (2013), too.
The University of Economics in Bratislava operating in the European Higher Education Area and the European Research Area celebrated 75th anniversary of its establishment in 2015, in the framework of which the International Scientific Conference for Doctoral Students and Post-Doctoral Scholars EDAMBA 2015 titled “The Era of Science Diplomacy: Implications for Economics, Business, Management and Related Disciplines“ was held on 21 – 23 October 2015 in cooperation with the Business Leaders Forum.
This paper analyzes the costs of (partial) institutional harmonization with the EU acquis which countries of the former USSR are expected to conduct under their Partnership and Cooperation Agreements with the EU and European Neighborhood Policy Action Plans. The public sector will have to take an effort of the transposition and adaptation of EU norms, as well as ensuring that they are complied with. Yet, the major part of the adjustment costs will fall on the private sector, as enterprises will have to make substantial investments to comply with new product requirements and business practices.
In this study we used the method of extrapolation of average costs for CEE countries’ harmonization with acquis to estimate the potential harmonization costs for the neighboring countries based on internationally comparative macroeconomic indicators like sectoral and total value added. This involved estimating the EU pre-accession support for the CEE countries by main areas as a percentage of the total or sectoral value added, determining the expected degree of limited harmonization in the ENP countries and estimating “coefficients of limited harmonization”, which was subsequently used for adjustment of the estimated cost of full harmonization.
Authored by: Veliko Dmitrov
Institutional harmonization is an important part of European integration, and its effects are more far reaching than the effects of trade liberalization. In its policy towards neighbors (the European Neighborhood Policy, ENP), the EU puts a lot of stress on the desirability of institutional harmonization, at least in certain areas. In particular, the free trade agreements that the EU envisages concluding with its Eastern neighbors will involve substantial harmonization of product standards, competition policy and a range of other policies and processes. At the very least, the harmonization will have to focus on the areas that relate to improvement of market access, i.e. removing restrictions to trade, harmonizing product standards and the systems of quality control etc. But in order to implement the new standards and rules, the EU neighbors will have to reform many related areas, so that the harmonization will encompass the whole system of economic governance. Not only will such a revamp help attaining better access to the EU markets, but also (and probably more importantly) it will stimulate modernization of the neighbors' economies and bring much needed efficiency gains.
In measurement of benefits of harmonization we refer to two methods: one based on the computable general equilibrium (CGE) modeling of welfare effects of better market access, and the other employing a growth model to estimate the wider effects of European institutions on growth. The estimation of costs of harmonization bases on extrapolation of the analogous costs in other countries, in particular CEE. These costs include expenses by a public sector on introduction of harmonization measures, as well as private sector expenses and investments related to their implementation.
Authored by: Anna Kolesnichenko
Published in 2009
During the last two decades the CIS countries have received very significant amounts of technical assistance from international development organizations and bilateral donors. While this has played a positive and important role in the transformation of these societies, practically all stakeholders currently share the opinion that many problems have accumulated in the area of technical cooperation with CIS countries. This paper intends to outline these problems, analyze their underlying reasons - including the changing environment for technical cooperation in the CIS - and the interaction of the interests of beneficiaries, donors and providers in the process of implementing technical cooperation projects. The analysis suggests that a good understanding, recognition and coordination of the interests of all TC stakeholders and a reduction in the information gap between the various participants in the technical cooperation process are necessary for improving the effectiveness of technical cooperation.
Authored by: Aziz Atamanov, Roman Mogilevsky
Published in 2008
In recent years, the EU has assumed a greater role in dealing with security concerns
within the EU. In response to nation states’ decreasing capabilities to deal effectively
with problems at the national level, domestic policy fields such as asylum and migration
have been at least partially transferred to supranational responsibility (Scharpf, 2003;
Zürn, 2000). One of the issues that receives increasing attention at the supranational
level is irregular migration. Every year, an estimated 30 million people cross an
international border irregularly, of which, according to Europol, between 400,000 and
500,000 enter the EU. The stock of irregular residents in the EU is currently estimated
to be around three million (Council of Europe, 2003). In recent years, EU members
have come to the conclusion that they are no longer able to properly react to the
phenomenon of irregular migration on the domestic level and instead need to combine
their efforts regarding return policies on the European level. Measures against irregular
immigration thus became a focal point in the EU’s efforts to establish an ‘area of
freedom, security and justice’.
At the same time, the EU’s role in the outside world has changed. With the Eastern
enlargement, new regions and countries became neighbours of the EU. New
frameworks of cooperation, such as the Stabilisation and Association Process (SAP)
and the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) were set in motion to closely affiliate
neighbouring states with the EU (Emerson, 2005; Emerson & Noutcheva, 2005;
Emerson et al., 2007; Landaburu, 2006; Tassinari, 2006). The EU tried to assume a
greater responsibility in the stabilisation of the neighbourhood and sought to “promote a
ring of well governed countries to the East of the European Union and on the borders
of the Mediterranean with whom we can enjoy close and cooperative relations”
(European Security Strategy, 2003, p. 8). A major challenge in the EU’s efforts to
stabilise the neighbourhood was to find a proper balance with the internal security
concerns. Whereas the EU’s foreign and security policy was interested in advancing
regional integration and good neighbourly relations, the EU justice and home affairs
ministers were primarily guided by their interest in keeping problems out and the
external border closed.
This paper is concerned with an EU foreign policy instrument that is a case in point for
this struggle: EC visa facilitation and readmission agreements. These agreements aim
at fostering good neighbourly relations by easing the tight visa regime with
neighbouring countries in order to externalise a restrictive migration policy. By
elaborating on the EU’s strategy on visa facilitation and readmission, this paper aims at
offering a first systematic analysis of the objective, substance, and political implications
of these agreements. When was the link between visa facilitation and readmission
made? What are the target
CeDEM Asia 2016 열린정부 아시아총회가 한국에서 처음 개최되다Han Woo PARK
Please find linked the current Call for Papers. I kindly inform you another CFP during the overlapped period of the #DISC2016 in December. Feel free to submit a paper on your own. The first submission deadline is 30 June 2016.
The website update includes new information about keynotes, venue and fees.
www.donau-uni.ac.at/cedemasia2016
Denisa Čiderová: The Era of Science Diplomacy: Implications for Economics, B...CUBCCE Conference
The London-based Royal Society publishing the world’s oldest scientific journal in continuous publication Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (since 1665) identified science diplomacy as still a fluid concept that can be applied to the role of science, technology and innovation in three dimensions of policy: Science in diplomacy; Diplomacy for science; Science for diplomacy. In June 2015 the European Commissioner for Research, Science and Innovation Carlos Moedas reiterated the Royal Society’s dimensions of science diplomacy in his speech The EU approach to science diplomacy at the European Institute in Washington.
Terms “diplomacy”, “science” and “art” are marked by variability of interpretations, with the French painter G. Braque pointing at one of possible links between science and art: « L’Art est fait pour trabler, la Science rassure. » (Notebooks: Day and Night, 1952 quoted in PODOLAN, 2014, p. 745); pivotal shift in the perception (of the complexity) of diplomacy is accentuated by editors of The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy (2013), too.
The University of Economics in Bratislava operating in the European Higher Education Area and the European Research Area celebrated 75th anniversary of its establishment in 2015, in the framework of which the International Scientific Conference for Doctoral Students and Post-Doctoral Scholars EDAMBA 2015 titled “The Era of Science Diplomacy: Implications for Economics, Business, Management and Related Disciplines“ was held on 21 – 23 October 2015 in cooperation with the Business Leaders Forum.
Does European economic integration create more inequality between domestic regions, or is the opposite true? We show that a general answer to this question does not exist, and that the outcome depends on the liberalisation scenario. In order to examine the impact of European and international integration on the regions, the paper develops a numerical simulation model with nine countries and 90 regions. Eastward extension of European integration is beneficial for old as well as new member countries, but within countries the impact varies across regions. Reduction in distance-related trade costs is particularly good for the European peripheries. Each liberalisation scenario has a distinct impact on the spatial income distribution, and there is no general rule telling that integration causes more or less agglomeration.
Authored by Arne Melchior
Published in 2009
This paper focuses on knowledge-based entrepreneurship, or new firm creation in industries which are considered to be science-based or to use research and development intensively, in the East Central European (ECE) context. On the basis of case studies of thirteen knowledge-based firms in six ECE countries, we suggest that KBE firms in these countries may differ in some important ways from the conventional picture of new technology based firms. In general, we see the ECE knowledge-intensive firm as a knowledge-localiser or customiser, adapting global knowledge to local needs on the domestic market, rather than a knowledge-creator generating new solutions for global markets. The entrepreneurs who start and run these businesses are skilled at spotting trends early and bringing them to their countries. Based in countries that generally have poor reputations as sources of innovative, high-technology products, but having established strong brands for themselves in their home markets, they are struggling with the challenge of entering export markets with products and services that can achieve global, or at least regional, recognition. The studies of the companies discussed here suggest that ECE firms are still in the early stages of this strategic shift.
Authored by: Slavo Radosevic, Richard Woodward, Deniz Eylem Yoruk
Published in 2011
The CIS countries' EU-related interests are very heterogeneous. The countries themselves differ not only in terms of their geopolitical and geo-economic situations, and how those affect their relations with the EU, but also in their levels of ambition in relation to the Union, as well as their specific sectoral interests. Some Eastern Partners have set full EU membership as their strategic goal; others want to enjoy the benefits of the common free market, and the ambitions of others are limited to developing cooperation in selected areas. Similarly, the EU's policy towards its Eastern neighbourhood is multi-level and very diverse, considering as it must the different characters of mutual relations. The EU and most of its Eastern partners have a sufficient number of common or converging interests to expect reasonable cooperation between the two sides to develop and deepen. However, serious challenges and problems exist that may prevent this positive scenario from being realised.
Authored by: Marcin Kaczmarski, Wojciech Kononczuk, Marek Menkiszak
Published in 2008
The CIS countries' EU-related interests are very heterogeneous. The countries themselves differ not only in terms of their geopolitical and geo-economic situations, and how those affect their relations with the EU, but also in their levels of ambition in relation to the Union, as well as their specific sectoral interests. Some Eastern Partners have set full EU membership as their strategic goal; others want to enjoy the benefits of the common free market, and the ambitions of others are limited to developing cooperation in selected areas. Similarly, the EU's policy towards its Eastern neighbourhood is multi-level and very diverse, considering as it must the different characters of mutual relations. The EU and most of its Eastern partners have a sufficient number of common or converging interests to expect reasonable cooperation between the two sides to develop and deepen. However, serious challenges and problems exist that may prevent this positive scenario from being realised.
Authored by: Marcin Kaczmarski, Wojciech Kononczuk, Marek Menkiszak
Published in 2008
The objective of the PICK-ME (Policy Incentives for Creation of Knowledge – Methods and Evidence) research project is to provide theoretical and empirical perspectives on innovation which give a greater role to the demand-side aspect of innovation. The main question is how can policy make enterprises more willing to innovate? This task is fulfilled by identifying what we consider the central or most salient aspect of a demand-side innovation- driven economy, which is the small and entrepreneurial yet fast growing and innovative firm. We use the term “Gazelle” to signify this type of firm throughout the paper. The main concern of policy-makers should therefore be how to support Gazelle type of firms through various policies. The effectiveness of different policy instruments are considered. For example, venture capitalism is in the paper identified as an important modern institution that renders exactly the type of coordination necessary to bring about an innovation system more orientated towards the demand side. This is because experienced entrepreneurs with superior skills in terms of judging the marketability of new innovations step in as financiers. Other factor market bottlenecks on the skills side must be targeted through education policies that fosters centers of excellence. R&D incentives are also considered as a separate instrument but more a question for future research since there is no evidence available on R&D incentives as a Gazelle type of policy. Spatial policies to foster more innovation have been popular in the past. But we conclude that whereas the literature often finds that new knowledge is developed in communities of physically proximate firms, there is no overshadowing evidence showing that spatial policies in particular had any impact on generating more of the Gazelle type of firms.
Authored by: Itzhak Goldberg, Camilla Jensen
Published in 2014
The CIS region is of vital importance for the EU countries considering that both are interconnected through cooperation or membership in supranational political and economic institutions (OSCE, WTO, OECD, NATO, etc.), through transport and energy corridors, through investment, trade and migration trends.
The interests of EU member states in the region are very diverse and are sometimes pursued in contradiction to one another. The overarching interest is of an economic nature, given the large reserves of natural resources (particularly gas and oil) and due to the size of the CIS market of 277 million consumers. Security and immigration issues also rank high on the list, whereas EU countries are less concerned with democratisation trends in the CIS. Russia is the most important CIS partner for a majority of EU countries. Energy plays a disproportionally high role in EU member states (MS) - Russia relations and is also a strong determinant of the overall heterogeneity of EU MS policies towards Russia. The type of bilateral relations which the EU MS maintain with one sub-region of the CIS (particularly the EENP, but increasingly also Central Asia) also affects their relations with Russia. Cultural closeness and a common history still play a large part in the development of bilateral relations. The accession to the EU of Central and Eastern European states has altered the existing relations between them and their eastern CIS neighbours, thereby also modifying their interests in the region. Regrettably, the EU's policies towards Russia and the EENP region have not yet been able to provide a playing field able to compensate for this alteration.
Thus, the present report studies the various interests (political, security, economic, cultural) which underpin relations between the EU member states and the CIS countries and also discusses the latest developments in EU policies towards a specific CIS sub-region (Russia, the Eastern ENP and Central Asia), thereby providing a broad picture of the type of interests, how they are pursued by the EU member states and where these intersect or clash.
Authored by: George Dura
Published in 2008
The The purpose of this paper is to analyze the various challenges facing European integration and the EU institutional architecture as result of the global financial crisis. The European integration process is not yet complete, both in terms of its content and geographical coverage. It can be viewed as a kind of intermediate hybrid between an international organization and a federation, subject to further evolution. This is also true of the Single European Market and the Economic and Monetary Union, which form the core of the EU economic architecture. Certain policy prerogatives (such as external trade, competition, and the Common Agriculture Policy) are delegated to the supranational level while others (such as financial supervision or fiscal policy) remain largely in the hands of national authorities.
Authored by: Marek Dąbrowski
Published in 2009
This paper provides the quantitative estimate of the potential growth bonus for CIS countries, and in particular EU's Easter Neighbours, that can be a result of deeper institutional harmonisation with the EU. Econometric investigation involving instrumental variable, simultaneous equation and dynamic panel techniques documents the strong positive link between growth performance and reforms, as well as between reforms and European integration. The paper derives the range of possible values of growth bonus from the deepened neighbourhood cooperation between 1 and 3.8 with the median at 1.8 percentage points. The least growth bonus is expected through basic liberalization reforms, while countries with a considerable institutional gap are likely to gain the most.
Authored by: Artur Radziwill, Pawel Smietanka
Published in 2009
The purpose of this paper is to examine the economic aspects of EU policy towards its Eastern neighbors in the former Soviet Union. For a long period of time, this region was considered as less important for the EU, as compared to Central and Eastern Europe, which was the subject of a far-reaching economic and political integration offer materialized in two rounds of EU Eastern Enlargements (2004, 2007). However, moving the EU's geographical frontier further to the East and Southeast increased the importance of the CIS region as a potential partner of the enlarged EU. In 2004, East European and Caucasus countries were invited to participate in the European Neighborhood Policy a new EU external policy framework also addressed to the Southern Mediterranean countries. Russia has been attempting to build a strategic political and economic partnership with the EU outside the ENP framework but the content of this relationship is, in fact, very similar to the ENP.
A general weakness of the ENP is that there is a lack of balance between farreaching expectations with respect to neighbors' policies and reforms, and limited and distant rewards that can potentially be offered. Thus, making this cooperation framework more effective requires a serious enhancement of the rewards using, to the extent possible, the positive experience of previous EU enlargements. The nature of contemporary economic relations in the globalized world calls for a more complex package-type approach to economic integration rather than just limiting cooperation to some narrow fields.
Authored by: Marek Dąbrowski
Published in 2007
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Research proposal call h2020 europe as a global actor_eastern partnership (1)
1. Blv. Carol I, nr. 19 (Corp I)
Iași - 700517, România
TEL +40.232.20.1318 | FAX: +40.232.2018.18,
E-mail: studeur@uaic.ro | www.cse.uaic.ro
RESEARCH PROJECT PROPOSAL
Call: Europe as a global actor. The European Union and the Eastern Partnership
Deadline: 28.05.2015
Information:
http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/topics/1060-
int-08-2015.html#tab2
Proposed research theme (title will be defined subsequently, after discussions in the network):
“Resilience capacity, institutions and sustainable development in the Eastern EU`s
peripherality (EU’s Eastern neighbourhood). A multidisciplinary approach: economic, socio-
cultural and political”
Relevance of proposed topic:
1. The perspective of EU's relations with its Eastern neighborhood depends not only on EU
action at internal or external level by adapting policies to the problems of the East or by the
geopolitical context of the region, but especially by the Eastern EU neighbourhood countries'
ability to adapt to new circumstances, to integrate, at a large scale, in the economy and
society, formal and informal European values (Europeanization process);
2. The existence of a rapidly changing external environment impose the increasing capacity of
continuously adaptability of states/regions ;
3. The concept that best reflects the potential of these countries to strengthen their democratic
systems, generate economic, societal, political transformations, which to support a
sustainable development process and to adapt its economy and society to European
standards (conditions of which depends the future of political stability in the region, the
future of EU external relations in its Eastern neighborhood, and its role in the region,
implicitly the prospects of EU as a global actor) is the concept of 'resilience';
4. The capacity of resilience depends essentially on the formal and informal institutions
that define a system and determines how efficiently the system manage the processes of
economy, it is able to expand the sources of innovation and long-term development, to
absorb shocks, to catching up the gaps, to overcome "path dependence";
5. Although it has become a key concept in European policies, the concept of resilience is not
enough developed in the theoretical and methodological literature, which are really needed;
6. EU's Eastern neighborhood is a little known area, current databases and existing studies not
provide a real and integrated knowledge of economic and spatial phenomena.
Correlation with call's objectives
1. Analysis of resilience capacity, of potential and vulnerabilities of the countries included in the
Eastern Partnership to go through a process of Europeanization and to adapt to changing
situations will provide a better understanding at European level of the region and its specific
problems; EU can thus offer a better response by adjusting internal and external policies;
2. The research could generate adequate tools for economic and institutional restructuring
policies in these countries, for more efficient and faster integration of Europeanization
elements and placing on a path of sustainable development and convergence with the
European model.
2. Blv. Carol I, nr. 19 (Corp I)
Iași - 700517, România
TEL +40.232.20.1318 | FAX: +40.232.2018.18,
E-mail: studeur@uaic.ro | www.cse.uaic.ro
Area of research: at least Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine and neighboring EU countries (such as
Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland, Latvia, Lithuania), which could/must play a key role in the
development of relationships and in the diffusion of the Europeanization and sustainable
development processes (functional integration process), reason for which the building of the
resilience capacity is relevant and important for the future of the EU's external relations in its
Eastern neighborhood); desirable also Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia to be studied.
Partners:
- At least one partner from the six countries of Eastern Partnership;
- Partners from the EU countries, with expertise in the field;
- At least one partner from the countries at the Eastern border of the EU
Main objectives:
1. Fundamental research: methodological developments in assessing resilience capacity;
2. Setting up of databases, needed for the establishment of development programs/
strategies;
3. Applied research: analysis of resilience capacity in mentioned countries;
4. Develop monitoring and guidance tools for resilience capacity
Main results:
1. Theoretical and empirical studies;
2. Databases;
3. Debates;
4. Transformations of perception and the understanding of resilience capacity in the analyzed
countries;
5. Tools and new methodological approaches;
6. Recommendations of European policies
What we have to do:
1. Identify partners and formation of the network;
2. Create the team of the project (European projects experience and results/interest in the
research area)
3. Identify a coordinator (universities/centers with relevant results in the field, which confirm
by previous results the ability to manage large research programs at European level – ex.: );
4. Scientific substantiation of the project;
5. Elaboration / collection of coordinator and partners documents;
6. Completion of the call proposal.
Obviously, the above information is only a starting point for discussions, with the purpose of
evaluating our common interest.
Another option, on the same line of research, could be the theme:
An integrated approach of the Eastern peripherality. New member countries vs. EU’s
neighbourhood countries.
The theme could be focused on specific issues of Eastern peripherality countries (economic,
institutional/political, spatial), with the purpose to provide a better understanding of the problems they
3. Blv. Carol I, nr. 19 (Corp I)
Iași - 700517, România
TEL +40.232.20.1318 | FAX: +40.232.2018.18,
E-mail: studeur@uaic.ro | www.cse.uaic.ro
face and their potential to reduce gaps and generate a functional integration process, as support for
diminishing the border effects and developing a common area of security and sustainable development.
The same area of research: EU’s Eastern countries, EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood countries.
Waiting your feedback and your opinions about the directions/contributions in which you could be
implied in the project,
Prof. Gabriela Carmen Pascariu
Director, Center for European Studies