Research project step #4: Final Paper
Hide Assignment Information
Instructions
Research project: Final paper, 150 points, 15% of final grade, due week 8
Your final paper will be the culmination of your research over the semester. It will be a minimum of 12 pages, plus a separate cover page and separate page for your bibliography.
The main part, your narrative will include the thesis, Introduction, the description/content of your research, and the conclusion.
The Introduction section should clearly state the thesis within the first 1-2 paragraphs. The thesis must be relevant and appropriate to the argument and demonstrate an accurate and complete understanding of the question(s).
The main part should incorporate pertinent details from assigned coursework and reliable outside historical sources. If in doubt about a sources, ask your instructor). The section must provide relevant historical evidence to support the thesis and the key claims made in the argument as needed. It should maintain focus and avoid getting sidetracked. It should present your answer(s) to the question(s) asked clearly and concisely in an organized manner and it should be free of grammar & spelling errors.
The conclusion section should be in the last part of your essay exam within the last 1-2 paragraphs. It should briefly restate the thesis and summarize the main points of the argument. It should also demonstrate insight and understanding regarding the question(s) asked and it should be free of grammar & spelling errors.
Be sure to use spell check!
Here is the grading rubric for the final paper:
A scoring rubric for each essay exam is included below. The exam question will be posted in the assignment folder.
Criteria
Mechanics – (5 criteria)
Minimum 12 double-spaced pages in length; pages are numbered; 1 inch margins included; 12 point Arial, Calibri, or Times New Roman font used; a cover page with identifying information included
All 5 criteria are present with 0-1 error
4 of 5 criteria are present OR all 5 criteria are present with 2-3 errors
3 of 5 criteria are present OR 4 of 5 criteria are present with 2-3 errors OR all 5 criteria are present with 4-5 errors
2 of 5 criteria are present OR 3 of 5 criteria are present with 2-3 errors OR 4 of 5 criteria are present with 4-5 errors OR all 5 criteria are present with 6-7 errors
0 or 1 of 5 criteria are present OR 2 of 5 criteria are present with 2-3 errors OR 3 of 5 criteria are present with 4-5 errors OR 4 of 5 criteria are present with 6-7 errors OR all 5 criteria are present with more than 7 errors
Citations – (5 criteria)
Footnotes/Endnotes & Works Cited/ Bibliography page included; Chicago/Turabian style used; selected sources are appropriate to the topic; citations support assertions made in the essay; footnotes/endnotes used in each instance where detailed explanations would distract from the argument
All 5 criteria are present with 0-1 error
4 of 5 criteria are present OR all 5 cri.
ASSIGNMENT QUESTION Case Study Assignment Assessing the Head, Ey.docxlynettearnold46882
ASSIGNMENT QUESTION: Case Study Assignment: Assessing the Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat
Nurses conducting assessments of the ears, nose, and throat must be able to identify the small differences between life-threatening conditions and benign ones. For instance, if a patient with a sore throat and a runny nose also has inflamed lymph nodes, the inflammation is probably due to the pathogen causing the sore throat rather than a case of throat cancer. With this knowledge and a sufficient patient health history, a nurse would not need to escalate the assessment to a biopsy or an MRI of the lymph nodes but would probably perform a simple strep test.
Most ear, nose, and throat conditions that arise in non-critical care settings are minor in nature. However, subtle symptoms can sometimes escalate into life-threatening conditions that require prompt assessment and treatment.
In this Case Study Assignment, you consider case studies of abnormal findings from patients in a clinical setting. You determine what history should be collected from the patients, what physical exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted, and formulate a differential diagnosis with several possible conditions.
To Prepare
· By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.
· Also, your Case Study Assignment should be in the Episodic/Focused SOAP Note format rather than the traditional narrative style format. Refer to Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text and the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template in the Week 5 Learning Resources for guidance. Remember that all Episodic/Focused SOAP Notes have specific data included in every patient case.
With regard to the case study you were assigned:
· Review this week's Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide.
· Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient.
· Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient's condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
· Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.
Assignment Question
Use the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template and create an episodic/focused note about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned using the episodic/focused note template provided in the Week 5 resources. Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for each case. List five different possible conditions for the patient's differential diagnosis and justify why you selected each.
Learning objectives:
· Apply assessment skills to diagnose eye, ears, and throat conditions
· Apply concepts, theories, and principles relating to health assessment techniques and diagnoses for the head, neck, eyes, ears, nose, and throat
Focused throat Exam
Li.
Florida National UniversityResearch Assignment #1PurposeThe ShainaBoling829
Florida National University
Research Assignment #1Purpose
The student will read and understand the given case scenario and further develop a hypothetical project. The student will answer given questions that will serve as a guide for this project. Also, the student will explain key concepts and apply theoretical frameworks, models and/ or theories pertinent to this case.General directions
1. You will submit one (1) paper as part of this assignment (individual assignment).
2. Your research paper must follow APA format according to Publication Manual American Psychological Association (APA) (6th ed.). Include a cover page and headings per 6th edition APA guidelines.
3. The research paper should be minimum of 3 pages (not including the title or reference pages) – maximum of 6 pages (not including the title or reference pages), single spaced, Times New Roman, Size 12, and 5 references related to the topic (3 must be peer-reviewed journal articles).Research Paper
4. Include the following components in your research paper:
a. Title Page
b. Introduction
c. Problem Statement
d. Population of Interest
e. Key concepts such as: obesity, social determinants of health, health promotion and risk reduction, role of community health nurses.
f. Theoretical frameworks of behavioral change / models
g. Planning community intervention / Funding
h. Evaluate the community-level intervention
i. Social marketing / resources
j. Research studies (at least 3 peer-reviewed journal articles)
k. Conclusion
l. References Page
5. All Florida National University policies related to plagiarism must be observed.Directions and Grading Criteria: Research paper #1
Category
Points
Description
Introduction
5
The introduction must be clear and concise and be inclusive of a brief summary of the intent of your paper. It must also provide a formal purpose statement to set your paper up for your reader(s).
Problem Statement
10
Fully describe the primary problem you are addressing as part of your potential hypothetical project. Integrate contemporary/scholarly evidence (no more than 7 years old) to support the need for change.
Population of Interest
5
Describe your population of interest.
Key
Concepts
10
1. Introduce / explain key concepts such as: obesity, social determinants of health, health promotion and risk reduction, role of community health nurses.
2. Theoretical frameworks of behavioral change / models
10
Describe and apply a behavioral change model that addresses health promotion and risk reduction in this particular case (theoretical frameworks of behavioral change / models discussed on Chapter 5 of textbook).
3. Planning community intervention / Funding
10
Describe the selection of the most appropriate intervention / Describe your implementation plan. Apply collaboration / teamwork / funding. Provide explanation. Support your answer with evidence-based research literature.
4. Evaluate the community-level intervention
10
Describe your evaluation of the community-le ...
Advanced Pathophysiology.For this Assignment Please follow the.docxdaniahendric
Advanced Pathophysiology.
For this Assignment Please follow the Rubric points to cover all areas. (2-page case study analysis) APA style, at least 3 citations and 3 matching references.
WEEK #4 TOPIC
WEEK #4 – CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
Scenario 1: 76-year-old female patient complains of weight gain, shortness of breath, peripheral edema, and abdominal swelling. She has a history of congestive heart failure and admits to not taking her diuretic, as it makes her “have to get up every couple hours to go to the bathroom.” She now has to sleep on two pillows in order to get enough air.
In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following
· The cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.
· Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
· How these processes interact to affect the patient.
RUBRIC
Develop a 2-page case study analysis, examing the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following:
Explain both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms.
28 (28%) - 30 (30%)
The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms.
The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed reasons, with explanation for both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
25 (25%) - 27 (27%)
The response describes the patient symptoms.
The response includes accurate reasons, with explanation for both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
23 (23%) - 24 (24%)
The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate.
The response includes reasons for the cardiovascular and/or cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes, with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.
0 (0%) - 22 (22%)
The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing.
The response does not include reasons for either the cardiovascular or cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.
Explain how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.
28 (28%) - 30 (30%)
The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.
25 (25%) - 27 (27%)
The response includes an accurate explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.
23 (23%) - 24 (24%)
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation ...
Advanced Pathophysiology.For this Assignment Please follow the.docxMARK547399
Advanced Pathophysiology.
For this Assignment Please follow the Rubric points to cover all areas. (2-page case study analysis) APA style, at least 3 citations and 3 matching references.
WEEK #4 TOPIC
WEEK #4 – CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
Scenario 1: 76-year-old female patient complains of weight gain, shortness of breath, peripheral edema, and abdominal swelling. She has a history of congestive heart failure and admits to not taking her diuretic, as it makes her “have to get up every couple hours to go to the bathroom.” She now has to sleep on two pillows in order to get enough air.
In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following
· The cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.
· Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
· How these processes interact to affect the patient.
RUBRIC
Develop a 2-page case study analysis, examing the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following:
Explain both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms.
28 (28%) - 30 (30%)
The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms.
The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed reasons, with explanation for both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
25 (25%) - 27 (27%)
The response describes the patient symptoms.
The response includes accurate reasons, with explanation for both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
23 (23%) - 24 (24%)
The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate.
The response includes reasons for the cardiovascular and/or cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes, with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.
0 (0%) - 22 (22%)
The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing.
The response does not include reasons for either the cardiovascular or cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.
Explain how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.
28 (28%) - 30 (30%)
The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.
25 (25%) - 27 (27%)
The response includes an accurate explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.
23 (23%) - 24 (24%)
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation.
My topic is low self esteemconfidenceA research prospectus (5 –.docxmayank272369
My topic is low self esteem/confidence
A research prospectus (5 – 10 pages) is a plan or research design (for your pre-approved topic) that covers:
Your research question
The methods and data you plan to employ to answer your research question
A brief evaluation of the existing scholarly literature on your proposed research question
Limitations of the project
What you hope to achieve with this research (implications for your field)
An initial reference list or bibliography of scholarly sources you plan to use to conduct your research
Prospectus Rubric
Score
Title Page
/5
Abstract
/5
Literature Review
/10
Statement of the Problem
/5
Research Question
/5
Purpose
/5
Operational Definitions
/5
Hypotheses
/5
Instruments
/10
Sample Description
/5
Procedures
/10
Statistical Plan
/5
Limitations
/5
Study Significance
/5
Predicted Results
/5
Implications
/5
References
/10
APA Format
/10
Grammar
/5
Spelling
/5
TOTAL POINTS
/125
Description of Rating Scale
Title Page
5: Is appropriate in tone and structure to education journals, contain necessary descriptors (subjects, independent (IV) and dependent variables (DV)), and allows readers to anticipate design
4: Is appropriate in tone and structure to education journal, most descriptors present;
3: Title without appropriate APA formatting
2: Identifies one descriptor, lacks design information or is misleading
1: Is not relevant to the intended study or is missing
Review of Literature
10: The review of literature is appropriate, provides background information and a critique of previous research that points out weaknesses, conflicts and areas of needed study
8: The review of literature is appropriate, most background information provided, critique points out some but not all of the areas of needed study.
5: The review of literature provides most of the background information
3: The review of literature provides some of the background information
1: The review of literature is provides little of the background information
Statement of the Problem
5: The problem statement is concise, includes descriptor variables and informs the reader of the exact purpose of the study
4: The statement of the problem includes most of the descriptor variables and informs the reader of the exact purpose of the study
3: The statement of the problem includes 1 descriptor variable and informs the reader of the purpose of the study
2: The statement of the problem is unclear and does not include any descriptor variables
1: The statement of the problem is missing or is unclear and unable to be interpreted
Operational Definitions
5: Basic assumptions are stated and specify certain conditions that must exist for the study to proceed, limitations or possible shortcomings are acknowledged by the researcher
4: Most basic assumptions are state and the shortcoming of the study are acknowled.
TaskAssignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks.docxbradburgess22840
Task
Assignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks. Text material which may be relevant to the question may be drawn from any of text chapters 12, 13 and 14.
Question (10 marks)
Answer the following:
Why might an increase in government expenditure give rise to inflation?
Rationale
The question addresses the following learning outcome:
· be able to examine critically the health of the economy as a whole through the analysis of major economic variables and advise on likely policy alternatives.
Marking criteria
Learning objective: Academic writing and applying economic principles and theories to labour market issues.
High Distinction(85%+)
Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style. No major grammatical and spelling errors. All references, including recent literature, cited and used accurately.
Distinction (75%-84%)
Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style. No spelling errors, minor grammatical errors. Relevant references cited and used accurately.
Credit (65%-74%)
A satisfactory standard of expression. Relatively clear and concise in expression of ideas. Few spelling and/or grammar errors. Majority of references are presented and used accurately.
Pass (50%-64%)
Some inconsistency in sentence structure. Clarity of expression could be enhanced by some revision. Several spelling errors and/or poor grammar. Very limited references cited and used.
Fail (Less than 50%)
Poor communication of ideas due to careless writing and lack of proof-reading. Too many spelling and/or grammar errors. References not included or inappropriately applied
Learning objective: Research, content & knowledge of topic by analysing conditions in the Australian labour market.
High Distinction(85%+)
Skilful use of data, theoretical knowledge and ongoing debate on the issue, and they are well integrated Contains insights and awareness of deeper and more subtle aspects of the relevant theory. There is clear evidence of researched/read more widely beyond the core materials
Distinction (75%-84%)
Skilful use of data, theory and recent debate, but they are not well integrated. Presents issues in the broader context and demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding of most aspects of the essay topic. There is evidence of having read beyond the core materials.
Credit (65%-74%)
Demonstrates knowledge of principles and concepts. Demonstrates good understanding of the relevant theory presented in the texts and readings.
Pass (50%-64%)
Contains limited use of theoretical knowledge. Fails to demonstrate awareness of market trends. While some literature is presented they purely descriptive and they are not well integrated.
Fail (Less than 50%)
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of key principles and concepts. There is very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Contains only a few ideas and they are presented uncritically in a purely d.
TaskAssignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks.docxdeanmtaylor1545
Task
Assignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks. Text material which may be relevant to the question may be drawn from any of text chapters 12, 13 and 14.
Question (10 marks)
Answer the following:
Why might an increase in government expenditure give rise to inflation?
Rationale
The question addresses the following learning outcome:
· be able to examine critically the health of the economy as a whole through the analysis of major economic variables and advise on likely policy alternatives.
Marking criteria
Learning objective: Academic writing and applying economic principles and theories to labour market issues.
High Distinction(85%+)
Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style. No major grammatical and spelling errors. All references, including recent literature, cited and used accurately.
Distinction (75%-84%)
Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style. No spelling errors, minor grammatical errors. Relevant references cited and used accurately.
Credit (65%-74%)
A satisfactory standard of expression. Relatively clear and concise in expression of ideas. Few spelling and/or grammar errors. Majority of references are presented and used accurately.
Pass (50%-64%)
Some inconsistency in sentence structure. Clarity of expression could be enhanced by some revision. Several spelling errors and/or poor grammar. Very limited references cited and used.
Fail (Less than 50%)
Poor communication of ideas due to careless writing and lack of proof-reading. Too many spelling and/or grammar errors. References not included or inappropriately applied
Learning objective: Research, content & knowledge of topic by analysing conditions in the Australian labour market.
High Distinction(85%+)
Skilful use of data, theoretical knowledge and ongoing debate on the issue, and they are well integrated Contains insights and awareness of deeper and more subtle aspects of the relevant theory. There is clear evidence of researched/read more widely beyond the core materials
Distinction (75%-84%)
Skilful use of data, theory and recent debate, but they are not well integrated. Presents issues in the broader context and demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding of most aspects of the essay topic. There is evidence of having read beyond the core materials.
Credit (65%-74%)
Demonstrates knowledge of principles and concepts. Demonstrates good understanding of the relevant theory presented in the texts and readings.
Pass (50%-64%)
Contains limited use of theoretical knowledge. Fails to demonstrate awareness of market trends. While some literature is presented they purely descriptive and they are not well integrated.
Fail (Less than 50%)
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of key principles and concepts. There is very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Contains only a few ideas and they are presented uncritically in a purely d.
ASSIGNMENT QUESTION Case Study Assignment Assessing the Head, Ey.docxlynettearnold46882
ASSIGNMENT QUESTION: Case Study Assignment: Assessing the Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat
Nurses conducting assessments of the ears, nose, and throat must be able to identify the small differences between life-threatening conditions and benign ones. For instance, if a patient with a sore throat and a runny nose also has inflamed lymph nodes, the inflammation is probably due to the pathogen causing the sore throat rather than a case of throat cancer. With this knowledge and a sufficient patient health history, a nurse would not need to escalate the assessment to a biopsy or an MRI of the lymph nodes but would probably perform a simple strep test.
Most ear, nose, and throat conditions that arise in non-critical care settings are minor in nature. However, subtle symptoms can sometimes escalate into life-threatening conditions that require prompt assessment and treatment.
In this Case Study Assignment, you consider case studies of abnormal findings from patients in a clinical setting. You determine what history should be collected from the patients, what physical exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted, and formulate a differential diagnosis with several possible conditions.
To Prepare
· By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.
· Also, your Case Study Assignment should be in the Episodic/Focused SOAP Note format rather than the traditional narrative style format. Refer to Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text and the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template in the Week 5 Learning Resources for guidance. Remember that all Episodic/Focused SOAP Notes have specific data included in every patient case.
With regard to the case study you were assigned:
· Review this week's Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide.
· Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient.
· Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient's condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
· Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.
Assignment Question
Use the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template and create an episodic/focused note about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned using the episodic/focused note template provided in the Week 5 resources. Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for each case. List five different possible conditions for the patient's differential diagnosis and justify why you selected each.
Learning objectives:
· Apply assessment skills to diagnose eye, ears, and throat conditions
· Apply concepts, theories, and principles relating to health assessment techniques and diagnoses for the head, neck, eyes, ears, nose, and throat
Focused throat Exam
Li.
Florida National UniversityResearch Assignment #1PurposeThe ShainaBoling829
Florida National University
Research Assignment #1Purpose
The student will read and understand the given case scenario and further develop a hypothetical project. The student will answer given questions that will serve as a guide for this project. Also, the student will explain key concepts and apply theoretical frameworks, models and/ or theories pertinent to this case.General directions
1. You will submit one (1) paper as part of this assignment (individual assignment).
2. Your research paper must follow APA format according to Publication Manual American Psychological Association (APA) (6th ed.). Include a cover page and headings per 6th edition APA guidelines.
3. The research paper should be minimum of 3 pages (not including the title or reference pages) – maximum of 6 pages (not including the title or reference pages), single spaced, Times New Roman, Size 12, and 5 references related to the topic (3 must be peer-reviewed journal articles).Research Paper
4. Include the following components in your research paper:
a. Title Page
b. Introduction
c. Problem Statement
d. Population of Interest
e. Key concepts such as: obesity, social determinants of health, health promotion and risk reduction, role of community health nurses.
f. Theoretical frameworks of behavioral change / models
g. Planning community intervention / Funding
h. Evaluate the community-level intervention
i. Social marketing / resources
j. Research studies (at least 3 peer-reviewed journal articles)
k. Conclusion
l. References Page
5. All Florida National University policies related to plagiarism must be observed.Directions and Grading Criteria: Research paper #1
Category
Points
Description
Introduction
5
The introduction must be clear and concise and be inclusive of a brief summary of the intent of your paper. It must also provide a formal purpose statement to set your paper up for your reader(s).
Problem Statement
10
Fully describe the primary problem you are addressing as part of your potential hypothetical project. Integrate contemporary/scholarly evidence (no more than 7 years old) to support the need for change.
Population of Interest
5
Describe your population of interest.
Key
Concepts
10
1. Introduce / explain key concepts such as: obesity, social determinants of health, health promotion and risk reduction, role of community health nurses.
2. Theoretical frameworks of behavioral change / models
10
Describe and apply a behavioral change model that addresses health promotion and risk reduction in this particular case (theoretical frameworks of behavioral change / models discussed on Chapter 5 of textbook).
3. Planning community intervention / Funding
10
Describe the selection of the most appropriate intervention / Describe your implementation plan. Apply collaboration / teamwork / funding. Provide explanation. Support your answer with evidence-based research literature.
4. Evaluate the community-level intervention
10
Describe your evaluation of the community-le ...
Advanced Pathophysiology.For this Assignment Please follow the.docxdaniahendric
Advanced Pathophysiology.
For this Assignment Please follow the Rubric points to cover all areas. (2-page case study analysis) APA style, at least 3 citations and 3 matching references.
WEEK #4 TOPIC
WEEK #4 – CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
Scenario 1: 76-year-old female patient complains of weight gain, shortness of breath, peripheral edema, and abdominal swelling. She has a history of congestive heart failure and admits to not taking her diuretic, as it makes her “have to get up every couple hours to go to the bathroom.” She now has to sleep on two pillows in order to get enough air.
In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following
· The cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.
· Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
· How these processes interact to affect the patient.
RUBRIC
Develop a 2-page case study analysis, examing the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following:
Explain both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms.
28 (28%) - 30 (30%)
The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms.
The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed reasons, with explanation for both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
25 (25%) - 27 (27%)
The response describes the patient symptoms.
The response includes accurate reasons, with explanation for both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
23 (23%) - 24 (24%)
The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate.
The response includes reasons for the cardiovascular and/or cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes, with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.
0 (0%) - 22 (22%)
The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing.
The response does not include reasons for either the cardiovascular or cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.
Explain how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.
28 (28%) - 30 (30%)
The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.
25 (25%) - 27 (27%)
The response includes an accurate explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.
23 (23%) - 24 (24%)
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation ...
Advanced Pathophysiology.For this Assignment Please follow the.docxMARK547399
Advanced Pathophysiology.
For this Assignment Please follow the Rubric points to cover all areas. (2-page case study analysis) APA style, at least 3 citations and 3 matching references.
WEEK #4 TOPIC
WEEK #4 – CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
Scenario 1: 76-year-old female patient complains of weight gain, shortness of breath, peripheral edema, and abdominal swelling. She has a history of congestive heart failure and admits to not taking her diuretic, as it makes her “have to get up every couple hours to go to the bathroom.” She now has to sleep on two pillows in order to get enough air.
In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following
· The cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.
· Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
· How these processes interact to affect the patient.
RUBRIC
Develop a 2-page case study analysis, examing the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following:
Explain both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms.
28 (28%) - 30 (30%)
The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms.
The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed reasons, with explanation for both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
25 (25%) - 27 (27%)
The response describes the patient symptoms.
The response includes accurate reasons, with explanation for both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
23 (23%) - 24 (24%)
The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate.
The response includes reasons for the cardiovascular and/or cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes, with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.
0 (0%) - 22 (22%)
The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing.
The response does not include reasons for either the cardiovascular or cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.
Explain how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.
28 (28%) - 30 (30%)
The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.
25 (25%) - 27 (27%)
The response includes an accurate explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.
23 (23%) - 24 (24%)
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation.
My topic is low self esteemconfidenceA research prospectus (5 –.docxmayank272369
My topic is low self esteem/confidence
A research prospectus (5 – 10 pages) is a plan or research design (for your pre-approved topic) that covers:
Your research question
The methods and data you plan to employ to answer your research question
A brief evaluation of the existing scholarly literature on your proposed research question
Limitations of the project
What you hope to achieve with this research (implications for your field)
An initial reference list or bibliography of scholarly sources you plan to use to conduct your research
Prospectus Rubric
Score
Title Page
/5
Abstract
/5
Literature Review
/10
Statement of the Problem
/5
Research Question
/5
Purpose
/5
Operational Definitions
/5
Hypotheses
/5
Instruments
/10
Sample Description
/5
Procedures
/10
Statistical Plan
/5
Limitations
/5
Study Significance
/5
Predicted Results
/5
Implications
/5
References
/10
APA Format
/10
Grammar
/5
Spelling
/5
TOTAL POINTS
/125
Description of Rating Scale
Title Page
5: Is appropriate in tone and structure to education journals, contain necessary descriptors (subjects, independent (IV) and dependent variables (DV)), and allows readers to anticipate design
4: Is appropriate in tone and structure to education journal, most descriptors present;
3: Title without appropriate APA formatting
2: Identifies one descriptor, lacks design information or is misleading
1: Is not relevant to the intended study or is missing
Review of Literature
10: The review of literature is appropriate, provides background information and a critique of previous research that points out weaknesses, conflicts and areas of needed study
8: The review of literature is appropriate, most background information provided, critique points out some but not all of the areas of needed study.
5: The review of literature provides most of the background information
3: The review of literature provides some of the background information
1: The review of literature is provides little of the background information
Statement of the Problem
5: The problem statement is concise, includes descriptor variables and informs the reader of the exact purpose of the study
4: The statement of the problem includes most of the descriptor variables and informs the reader of the exact purpose of the study
3: The statement of the problem includes 1 descriptor variable and informs the reader of the purpose of the study
2: The statement of the problem is unclear and does not include any descriptor variables
1: The statement of the problem is missing or is unclear and unable to be interpreted
Operational Definitions
5: Basic assumptions are stated and specify certain conditions that must exist for the study to proceed, limitations or possible shortcomings are acknowledged by the researcher
4: Most basic assumptions are state and the shortcoming of the study are acknowled.
TaskAssignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks.docxbradburgess22840
Task
Assignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks. Text material which may be relevant to the question may be drawn from any of text chapters 12, 13 and 14.
Question (10 marks)
Answer the following:
Why might an increase in government expenditure give rise to inflation?
Rationale
The question addresses the following learning outcome:
· be able to examine critically the health of the economy as a whole through the analysis of major economic variables and advise on likely policy alternatives.
Marking criteria
Learning objective: Academic writing and applying economic principles and theories to labour market issues.
High Distinction(85%+)
Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style. No major grammatical and spelling errors. All references, including recent literature, cited and used accurately.
Distinction (75%-84%)
Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style. No spelling errors, minor grammatical errors. Relevant references cited and used accurately.
Credit (65%-74%)
A satisfactory standard of expression. Relatively clear and concise in expression of ideas. Few spelling and/or grammar errors. Majority of references are presented and used accurately.
Pass (50%-64%)
Some inconsistency in sentence structure. Clarity of expression could be enhanced by some revision. Several spelling errors and/or poor grammar. Very limited references cited and used.
Fail (Less than 50%)
Poor communication of ideas due to careless writing and lack of proof-reading. Too many spelling and/or grammar errors. References not included or inappropriately applied
Learning objective: Research, content & knowledge of topic by analysing conditions in the Australian labour market.
High Distinction(85%+)
Skilful use of data, theoretical knowledge and ongoing debate on the issue, and they are well integrated Contains insights and awareness of deeper and more subtle aspects of the relevant theory. There is clear evidence of researched/read more widely beyond the core materials
Distinction (75%-84%)
Skilful use of data, theory and recent debate, but they are not well integrated. Presents issues in the broader context and demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding of most aspects of the essay topic. There is evidence of having read beyond the core materials.
Credit (65%-74%)
Demonstrates knowledge of principles and concepts. Demonstrates good understanding of the relevant theory presented in the texts and readings.
Pass (50%-64%)
Contains limited use of theoretical knowledge. Fails to demonstrate awareness of market trends. While some literature is presented they purely descriptive and they are not well integrated.
Fail (Less than 50%)
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of key principles and concepts. There is very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Contains only a few ideas and they are presented uncritically in a purely d.
TaskAssignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks.docxdeanmtaylor1545
Task
Assignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks. Text material which may be relevant to the question may be drawn from any of text chapters 12, 13 and 14.
Question (10 marks)
Answer the following:
Why might an increase in government expenditure give rise to inflation?
Rationale
The question addresses the following learning outcome:
· be able to examine critically the health of the economy as a whole through the analysis of major economic variables and advise on likely policy alternatives.
Marking criteria
Learning objective: Academic writing and applying economic principles and theories to labour market issues.
High Distinction(85%+)
Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style. No major grammatical and spelling errors. All references, including recent literature, cited and used accurately.
Distinction (75%-84%)
Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style. No spelling errors, minor grammatical errors. Relevant references cited and used accurately.
Credit (65%-74%)
A satisfactory standard of expression. Relatively clear and concise in expression of ideas. Few spelling and/or grammar errors. Majority of references are presented and used accurately.
Pass (50%-64%)
Some inconsistency in sentence structure. Clarity of expression could be enhanced by some revision. Several spelling errors and/or poor grammar. Very limited references cited and used.
Fail (Less than 50%)
Poor communication of ideas due to careless writing and lack of proof-reading. Too many spelling and/or grammar errors. References not included or inappropriately applied
Learning objective: Research, content & knowledge of topic by analysing conditions in the Australian labour market.
High Distinction(85%+)
Skilful use of data, theoretical knowledge and ongoing debate on the issue, and they are well integrated Contains insights and awareness of deeper and more subtle aspects of the relevant theory. There is clear evidence of researched/read more widely beyond the core materials
Distinction (75%-84%)
Skilful use of data, theory and recent debate, but they are not well integrated. Presents issues in the broader context and demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding of most aspects of the essay topic. There is evidence of having read beyond the core materials.
Credit (65%-74%)
Demonstrates knowledge of principles and concepts. Demonstrates good understanding of the relevant theory presented in the texts and readings.
Pass (50%-64%)
Contains limited use of theoretical knowledge. Fails to demonstrate awareness of market trends. While some literature is presented they purely descriptive and they are not well integrated.
Fail (Less than 50%)
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of key principles and concepts. There is very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Contains only a few ideas and they are presented uncritically in a purely d.
Leadership for Practical Nursing Assignment Rubric Utilization .docxDIPESH30
Leadership for Practical Nursing Assignment Rubric: Utilization of a Nursing Theory (45% of PNUR2300 grade)
Category
Mark
Above Standard
Expected Standard
Approaching Standard
F- Below Standard
Score
Organization
5
Engaging introduction and thoughtful conclusion.
Purpose of paper clearly identified
Logical focused presentation of well developed ideas
Smooth flow of ideas
Significant details evident
A+ 4.5-5/5 A 4-4.5/5
Effective introduction and conclusion.
Purpose of paper included
Main ideas are straightforward
Transition of ideas between paragraphs is evident.
Relevant details
B+ 3.75-3.9/5 B 3.5-3.75/5
Introduction and conclusion are lacking in clarity
Discernible purpose statement, but inadequate development
Ideas and purposes are recognizable but simple
Transitions not always smooth
Adequate detail
C+ 3.25-3.4/5
Introduction and conclusion weak, vague or cursory
No purpose statement included
Main points are not clear or not logically developed.
Transitions are lacking in clarity
Some appropriate details, some inadequate information present
< 3.25/5 Below 65%
Content
1.
Identification of Issue
10
Parameters of content clearly identified.
Perceptive, sure grasp of the issue
A sense of completeness about the handling of the issue
Assignment criteria are met with depth and/or creativity demonstrated.
A+ 9.0-10/10 A 8.0-9.0/10
Parameters of content are evident.
Good grasp of issue
Careful presentation of evidence, accurately documented
Assignment criteria are met.
B+ 7.5-7.9/10 B 7.0-7.4/10
Parameters of the content are identified but reflect a lack of understanding of issue
Adequate grasp of issue
Documentation or evidence is present, but awkwardly or routinely handled
Not all assignment criteria are met; minor gaps are evident
C+ 6.5-6.9/10
Some attempt to supply evidence or to document content
Weak grasp of issue
No clear development of issue, issue superficially covered.
Not all assignment criteria are met; many gaps are evident
< 6.4/10 Below 65%
2.
Utilization & Application of Theorist
10
Parameters of content clearly identified.
Perceptive, sure grasp of theory utilization
A sense of completeness about the theory application
Identification of metaparadigm is met with depth
A+ 9.0-10/10 A 8.0-9.0/10
Parameters of content are evident.
Good grasp of theory utilization
Careful presentation of theory application is evident and accurately documented
Identification of metaparadigm is met.
B+ 7.5-7.9/10 B 7.0-7.4/10
Parameters of the content are identified but reflect a lack of understanding
Adequate grasp of theory utilization
Documentation or evidence of theory application is present ...
#35537 Topic Course Project Part 3—Translating Evidence Into Pra.docxAASTHA76
#35537 Topic: Course Project: Part 3—Translating Evidence Into Practice. Continuation of the assignment attached
Number of Pages: 3 (Double Spaced)
Number of sources: 3
Writing Style: APA
Type of document: Coursework
Academic Level:Master
Category: Nursing
VIP Support: N/A
Language Style: English (U.S.)
Order Instructions: Attached
In Part 3 of the Course Project, you consider how the evidence you gathered during Part 2 can be translated into nursing practice.
Now that you have located available research on your PICOT question, you will examine what the research indicates about nursing practices. Connecting research evidence and findings to actual decisions and tasks that nurses complete in their daily practice is essentially what evidence-based practice is all about. This final component of the Course Project asks you to translate the evidence and data from your literature review into authentic practices that can be adopted to improve health care outcomes. In addition, you will also consider possible methods and strategies for disseminating evidence-based practices to your colleagues and to the broader health care field.
To prepare:
Consider Parts 1 and 2 of your Course Project. How does the research address your PICOT question?
With your PICOT question in mind, identify at least one nursing practice that is supported by the evidence in two or more of the articles from your literature review. Consider what the evidence indicates about how this practice contributes to better outcomes.
Explore possible consequences of failing to adopt the evidence-based practice that you identified.
Consider how you would disseminate information about this evidence-based practice throughout your organization or practice setting. How would you communicate the importance of the practice?
To complete:
In a 3- to 4-page paper:
Restate your PICOT question and its significance to nursing practice.
Summarize the findings from the articles you selected for your literature review. Describe at least one nursing practice that is supported by the evidence in the articles. Justify your response with specific references to at least 2 of the articles.
Explain how the evidence-based practice that you identified contributes to better outcomes. In addition, identify potential negative outcomes that could result from failing to use the evidence-based practice.
Outline the strategy for disseminating the evidence-based practice that you identified throughout your practice setting. Explain how you would communicate the importance of the practice to your colleagues. Describe how you would move from disseminating the information to implementing the evidence-based practice within your organization. How would you address concerns and opposition to the change in practice?It should be combined with the other two components of the Course Project and turned in as your Portfolio Assignment for this course.
IMPORTANT
Reminder: The School of Nursing requires th.
the purpose of this paper is to address the following clinic.docxhelen23456789
the purpose of this paper is to address the following clinical scenario with the use of your textbook, external credible literature, and/or reliable electronic sources. Use the guide below to draft your paper and review the rubric to ensure you have met the assignment criteria. The expected length of the paper is 4-5 pages, which does not include the cover page and reference page(s).
Lisa Anderson, a 22 y.o., Caucasian single parent, is referred for genetic counseling by her pediatric Nurse Practitioner. She has a 3-year-old boy with developmental delay and small joint hyperextensibility. The pediatric Nurse Practitioner has diagnosed fragile X-associated mental retardation. She is currently pregnant with her second child at 14 weeks of gestation. The family history is unremarkable.
Please use the following headings/subheadings as a guide to draft your paper:
Introduction (including a brief purpose statement)
Identify the genetic mutation responsible for fragile X-associated mental retardation.
Describe and discuss how it causes the clinical syndrome of developmental delay, joint hyperextensibility, large testes, and facial abnormalities.
Identify which parent is the probable carrier of the genetic mutation?
Explain why this parent and the grandparents are phenotypically unaffected.
Discuss the likelihood that the unborn child will be affected?
VII. Conclusion
I
n regard to APA format, please use the following as a guide:
Include a cover page and running head (this is not part of the 4–5-page limit)
Include transitions in your paper (i.e., headings or subheadings)
Use in-text references throughout the paper
Use double space, 12-point Times New Roman font
Spelling, grammar, and organization are appropriate
Include a reference list (this is not part of the 4–5-page limit)
Attempt to use primary sources only. That said, you may cite reliable electronic sources (i.e., ANA)
·
Assignment 1 Rubric
Criteria
60 Points
55 Points
50 Points
40 Points
Earned Points
Content: Application & Analysis
Responds correctly and/or appropriately to all questions and criteria. Content is excellent.
Demonstrates a high level of critical thinking, shows significant insight or creative thought about the topic, and does not merely recite the text/resources. Uses concepts and terminology correctly. Detail rich and specific.
Responds correctly and/or appropriately to all questions and criteria. Content is good.
Demonstrates some critical thinking throughout the paper and may also show some insight or creative thinking about the topic. Mostly uses concepts and terminology correctly (1-2 issues). Minor detail inconsistencies (1-2).
Responds correctly and/or appropriately to at least one question OR if only one question, partially responds to question. Does not address all criteria. Content is minimal.
Demonstrates at least one critic.
Portfolio Assignment The Role of the Nurse Informaticist in Syste.docxstilliegeorgiana
Portfolio Assignment: The Role of the Nurse Informaticist in Systems Development and Implementation
Assume you are a nurse manager on a unit where a new nursing documentation system is to be implemented. You want to ensure that the system will be usable and acceptable for the nurses impacted. You realize a nurse leader must be on the implementation team.
To Prepare:
· Review the steps of the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) and reflect on the scenario presented.
· Consider the benefits and challenges associated with involving a nurse leader on an implementation team for health information technology.
The Assignment: (2-3 pages)
In preparation of filling this role, develop a 2- to 3-page role description for a graduate-level nurse to guide his/her participation on the implementation team. The role description should be based on the SDLC stages and tasks and should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each of the following steps:
· Planning and requirements definition
· Analysis
· Design of the new system
· Implementation
· Post-implementation support
· Let your citations match your references
Submit your completed Role Description.
Submission and Grading Information
· RUBRIC
· Develop a 2- to 3-page role description for a graduate-level nurse to guide his/her participation on the implementation team. The role description should be based on the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) stages and tasks and should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each of the following steps:
· Planning and requirements definition
· Analysis
· Design of the new system
· Implementation
· Post-implementation support
77 (77%) - 85 (85%)
An accurate and fully developed role description is provided for the Assignment and fully supports the guidance of a graduate-level nurse's participation in the steps of the SDLC.
The responses accurately and thoroughly define in detail a graduate-level nurse's participation in the steps of the SDLC.
The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail the impacts of a graduate-level nurse's participation in the steps of the SDLC.
68 (68%) - 76 (76%)
A role description is provided for the Assignment and supports the guidance of a graduate-level nurse's participation in the steps of the SDLC.
The responses define a graduate-level nurse's participation in the steps of the SDLC.
The responses explain the impact of the graduate-level nurse's participation in the steps of the SDLC.
60 (60%) - 67 (67%)
A vague or inaccurate role description is provided for the Assignment and vaguely or inaccurately provides guidance to a graduate-level nurse's participation in the steps of the SDLC.
The responses defining the graduate-level nurse's participation in the steps of the SDLC are vague or inaccurate.
The responses explaining the impact of the graduate-level nurse's participation in the steps of the SDLC are vague or inaccurate.
0 (0%) - 59 (59%)
A vague and inac ...
Case Study 1 1Unsatisfactory 0-710.00 2Less Than Sat.docxwendolynhalbert
Case Study 1
1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
40.0 %Accurate identification of anemia classification and rationale.
Identification of anemia classification and rationale is not offered.
Identification of anemia classification and rationale is offered, but incomplete, lacking relevant information, such as rationale.
Identification of anemia classification and rationale meets the basic requirements of the assignment.
Identification of anemia classification and rationale is offered in detail.
Identification of anemia classification and rationale is offered in detail, while demonstrating evidence of deeper insight and/or reflection.
40.0 %Explanation of patient diagnosis with rationale from case findings. Outside sources and/or medical and nursing references used to support conclusions.
Explanation of patient diagnosis is not offered.
Explanation of patient diagnosis is offered, but incomplete, lacking relevant information, or does not provide outside sources and/or medical and nursing references to support conclusions.
Explanation of patient diagnosis uses outside sources and/or medical and nursing references to support conclusions, and meets the basic requirements of the assignment.
Explanation of patient diagnosis uses outside sources and/or medical and nursing references to support conclusions and is offered in detail.
Explanation of patient diagnosis uses outside sources and/or medical and nursing references to support conclusions and is offered in detail, while demonstrating evidence of deeper insight and/or reflection.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of arguments and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs apparent. Paragraphs exhibit unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to ...
Among the Resources in this module is the Rutherford (2008) articl.docxgreg1eden90113
Among the Resources in this module is the Rutherford (2008) article Standardized Nursing Language: What Does It Mean for Nursing Practice? In this article, the author recounts a visit to a local hospital to view the recent implementation of a new coding system.
During the visit, one of the nurses commented to her, “We document our care using standardized nursing languages but we don’t fully understand why we do” (Rutherford, 2008, para. 1).
How would you respond to a comment such as this one?
To Prepare:
· Review the concepts of informatics as presented in the Resources, particularly Rutherford, M. (2008) Standardized Nursing Language: What Does It Mean for Nursing Practice?
· Reflect on the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
· Consider how knowledge may be informed by data that is collected/accessed.
The Assignment:
In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:
· Explain how you would inform this nurse (and others) of the importance of standardized nursing terminologies.
· Describe the benefits and challenges of implementing standardized nursing terminologies in nursing practice. Be specific and provide examples.
· Be sure to support your paper with peer-reviewed research on standardized nursing terminologies that you consulted from the Walden Library.
Rutherford, M. A. (2008). Standardized nursing language: What does it mean for nursing practice? Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 13(1), 1–12. doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol13No01PPT05.
RUBIC
In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:
· Explain how you would inform this nurse (and others) of the importance of standardized nursing terminologies.
· Describe the benefits and challenges of implementing standardized nursing terminologies in nursing practice. Be specific and provide examples.
· Be sure to support your paper with peer-reviewed research on standardized nursing terminologies that you consulted from the Walden Library.--
Excellent 77 (77%) - 85 (85%)
The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail how to inform the nurse in the scenario, as well as others, on the importance of standardized nursing terminologies.
The responses accurately and thoroughly describe in detail the benefits and challenges of implementing standardized nursing terminologies in nursing practice, with sufficient supporting evidence and detailed examples.
Responses are fully supported as evidenced by 3 or more accurate, peer-reviewed research sources on standardized nursing terminologies.
Good 68 (68%) - 76 (76%)
The responses accurately explain how to inform the nurse in the scenario, as well as other, on the importance of standardized nursing terminologies.
The responses accurately describe the benefits and challenges of implementing standardized nursing terminologies in nursing practice, with some supporting evidence and examples.
Response are supported as evidenced by 2 or more accurate, peer-reviewed research sources on standardized nursing ter.
Discussion question
Discussion: Cardiovascular Alterations
At least once a year, the media report on a seemingly healthy teenage athlete collapsing during a sports game and dying of heart complications. These incidents continue to outline the importance of physical exams and health screenings for teenagers, especially those who play sports. During these health screenings, examiners check for cardiovascular alterations such as heart murmurs because they can be a sign of an underlying heart disorder. Since many heart alterations rarely have symptoms, they are easy to miss if health professionals are not specifically looking for them. Once cardiovascular alterations are identified in patients, it is important to refer them to specialists who can further investigate the cause.
Consider the following scenario:
A 16-year-old male presents for a sports participation examination. He has no significant medical history and no family history suggestive of risk for premature cardiac death. The patient is examined while sitting slightly recumbent on the exam table and the advanced practice nurse appreciates a grade II/VI systolic murmur heard loudest at the apex of the heart. Other physical findings are within normal limits, the patient denies any cardiovascular symptoms, and a neuromuscular examination is within normal limits. He is cleared with no activity restriction. Later in the season he collapses on the field and dies.
To Prepare
· Review the scenario provided, as well as Chapter 25 in the Huether and McCance text. Consider how you would diagnose and prescribe treatment for the patient.
· Select one of the following patient factors: genetics, ethnicity, or behavior. Reflect on how the factor you selected might impact diagnosis and prescription of treatment for the patient in the scenario.
By Day 3
Post a description of how you would diagnose and prescribe treatment for the patient in the scenario. Then explain how the factor you selected might impact the diagnosis and prescription of treatment for that patient.
Rubric to follow
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Proficient Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
44 (44%) - 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
40 (40%) - 43 (43%)
Responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
35 (35%) - 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion questi ...
Argumentative Essayby mutiu OlokodanaSubmission date 28.docxfestockton
Argumentative Essay
by mutiu Olokodana
Submission date: 28-Jan-2020 02:37AM (UTC-0500)
Submission ID: 1247589300
File name: temp_turnitintool_600359574.DoesTechnologyPromoteLoneliness.docx (18.59K)
Word count: 841
Character count: 4498
10. Recycled
42%
SIMILARITY INDEX
9%
INTERNET SOURCES
5%
PUBLICATIONS
42%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 29%
2 5%
3 3%
4 2%
5 1%
6 1%
7 1%
Argumentative Essay
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Submitted to Straighterline
Student Paper
Submitted to University of North Carolina -
Wilmington
Student Paper
Submitted to Cave Creek Unified District
Student Paper
Submitted to Saint Paul College
Student Paper
Submitted to Squalicum High School
Student Paper
Submitted to Grant MacEwan Community
College
Student Paper
Submitted to American Public University System
Student Paper
Exclude quotes Off
Exclude bibliography Off
Exclude matches Off
QM
FINAL GRADE
0/100
Argumentative Essay
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
PAGE 1
10. Recycled
Unfortunately, your essay is reworded from a paper that was already submitted to Straighterline or
another university. This is a type of plagiarism called recycling, which is unacceptable by
Straighterline policy. Therefore, you will need to completely rewrite a new essay with a new topic in
order for a submission under this assignment to be accepted and graded.
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
RUBRIC: ENG101 V6:ARGUMENTATIVE FINAL
THESIS (20%)
POINTS
(0)
POINTS
(2)
POINTS
(3)
POINTS
(3.50)
POINTS
(4)
POINTS
(5)
SUPPORT & DEV (15%)
POINTS
(0)
POINTS
(2)
POINTS
(3)
POINTS
(3.50)
0 / 5
0 / 5
Thesis, central idea, audience, purpose, digressions
Thesis or potential thesis is neither present in any portion of the essay, nor is it implied in
any manner. Thesis may be present but incorrect for the assignment’s
objectives/approach. Thesis may be present but the submission overall fails to meet most
assignment objectives (such as the essay is only a paragraph) that determining the thesis’
viability is problematic.
Lacks an identifiable thesis. Limited or no awareness of audience and purpose. Readers
cannot discern the essay’s central idea.
Thesis was attempted but unclear and/or inconsistently addressed. Reveals limited
awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea either lacking or inconsistently
addressed.
Thesis is identifiable, but perhaps too narrow, too broad, or otherwise problematic.
Awareness of audience may be adequate but inconsistent. Central idea is perhaps too
general and supported by irrelevant examples.
Thesis is established and is consistently addressed throughout most of the paper.
Awareness of audience is sufficient. Central idea is clear and maintained in most of the
essay.
Thesis is clearly established and maintained throughout the entire paper. Paper
demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea/focus
maintained throughout.
0 / 5
Thesis support, thesis development, use of examples, logic, ...
School of Nursing FNP MSN5300 Advanced Nursing Inquiry and.docxlillie234567
School of Nursing FNP
MSN5300 Advanced Nursing Inquiry
and Evidence-Based Practice
Purpose
· The purpose of this assignment is to create a presentation on critical appraisal of quantitative research article to evaluate its trustworthiness and its value to nursing.
Course Outcomes
· Apply the research process to improve evidence based clinical practice and contribute to knowledge development.
· Explain to a variety of audiences the evidence based for practice decisions, including the credibility of sources of information and the relevance to the practice problem confronted.
Program Learning Outcomes
· Integrate nursing and related sciences into the delivery of care to clients across diverse healthcare settings.
· Relate information and communication technologies to document and improve health outcomes.
· Employ collaborative interprofessional strategies for improving client and population health outcomes.
· Relate knowledge of illness and disease management to providing evidence-based care to clients, communities, and vulnerable populations in an evolving healthcare delivery system.
Due Date: Submit to the Moodle by Saturday of the end Week 14 at 11:59 p.m. ET.
Points: This assignment is worth a total of 100 points.
Requirements
· To complete this assignment, you will need to access the Miami Regional University virtual library database: CINAHL Complete Database, MEDLINE Complete Database, LIRN, and so forth. Our Librarian is available to help on campus from Monday to Friday 7:30 am to 9:00 pm & Saturday 8:00 am to 3:00 pm.
Remember we now also have a Ask a Librarian option 7 days a week available in Moodle.
· This assignment is worth 100 points and will be graded on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric. This assignment will be graded on quality of information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria and rubric.
· APA format and effective writing is required for this assignment.
· Create your presentation using the version of Microsoft PowerPoint. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS PowerPoint document because it will end in” pptx”.
·
Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about this presentation may be posted under the Q & A Forum.
· The length of the project report is to be
no greater than 20 slides, excluding the title and reference slide.
· This presentation will be submitted through Turnitin, a Turnitin similarity score of 20% or less is expected.
·
A minimum of 6 current scholarly references that are 5 years old or less.
· The textbook required for this course may be used as a reference for this assignment but does not count towards the required minimum number of scholarly references.
.
Module 1: Master's Prepared Nurse Interview Guide
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Less Than Satisfactory
3: Satisfactory
4: Good
5: Excellent
% Scaling
0%
80%
88%
92%
100%
Content – 70%
Introduction
5%
Introduction lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Introduction is insufficiently developed and/or vague. Purpose is not clear.
Introduction is clear, forecasting development of the paper.
Introduction is comprehensive; purpose of the paper is present.
Introduction is comprehensive and makes the purpose of the paper clear by restating the thesis.
Career
Overview
15%
Omits major elements and is disorganized.
Describes but fails to paint a clear picture of the nurse's career and/or progression in a logical order.
Addresses most of the primary elements of the individual's career in a logical fashion.
Addresses the primary elements. Reader can easily see purpose.
Thoroughly presents all of the information to portray a clear chronology as well as richness of detail.
Graduate
Education
15%
Omits major elements; is disorganized; and has no depth or detail.
Describes but fails to address some of the elements; lacks depth and detail.
Addresses the same elements but lacks depth and detail.
Necessary elements are present and clearly presented. Decision-making process is evident to the reader.
Thoroughly presents the process that led to the decision to seek graduate education as well as the program itself with clarity, order, and depth.
Present
Position (includes pearls of wisdom)
20%
Omits major elements; information is tangential and disorganized.
Describes but fails to address most of the primary elements in any depth.
Addresses most of the primary elements of the present position with recognition of competencies but lacks detail.
All key elements are presented with clarity.
Thoroughly presents all of the key elements of the present position with emphasis on competencies required. Describes in rich detail, and includes advice given and original insights.
Conclusion
15%
Conclusion lacks any discernible purpose.
Conclusion is insufficiently developed and/or vague.
Conclusion is clear and identifies key points of interview but fails to draw inferences.
Conclusion is clearly evident to the reader. Career opportunities are present.
Conclusion is comprehensive; paints a clear picture of the potential outcomes and career opportunities of graduate education; identifies key points of the interview; and demonstrates insight and interpretation.
Organization and Effectiveness – 20%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7%
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are com ...
1. From the breadth and depth of the economic downturn, it was cle.docxjeremylockett77
1. From the breadth and depth of the economic downturn, it was clear that no one single policy action would address the problem. Briefly discuss how the various actions taken by the Treasury and the Fed served to work together or possibly against one another to address the problems.
2. How did the backgrounds of both Geithner and Bernanke serve to assist or hinder them in understanding and acting to solve the problems?
3. "The biggest problem we now face is how the Treasury and Fed can withdraw from the heavy level of financial support that they’ve provided without plunging the economy back into a recession." Please comment on this proposition.
ENG 102 Media Analysis Rubric
Points
2
F
Points
3
D-/D/D+
Points
3.5
C-/C/C+
Points
4
B-/B/B+
Points
5
A-/A/A+
Thesis & Focus
Thesis, focus on single element of media, central idea, audience, purpose, digressions
Lacks an identifiable thesis. Limited or no awareness of audience and purpose. Focus is unclear.
Readers cannot discern the essay’s central idea.
Thesis was attempted but unclear and/or inconsistently addressed.
Focus might be unclear or muddled between more than one part of chosen media.
Reveals limited awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea either lacking or inconsistently addressed.
Thesis is identifiable, but perhaps too narrow, too broad, or otherwise problematic. Focus is clear, but might be muddled between more than one part of chosen media. Awareness of audience and purpose may be adequate but inconsistent. Central idea is perhaps too general and supported by irrelevant examples.
Thesis is established and is consistently addressed throughout most of the paper. Focus is limited to ONE part of chosen media. Awareness of audience and purpose is sufficient. Central idea is clear and maintained in most of the essay.
Thesis is clearly established and maintained throughout the entire paper. Focus is limited to ONE part of chosen media. Paper demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea/focus maintained throughout.
Support & Development
Thesis support, thesis development, analysis of media, use of examples, logic, and reason
No support of thesis with relevant facts, examples, reasons, or evidence. Body of essay fails to analyze chosen media. Topic development is flawed or non-existent.
Support is minimal, logically flawed, and/or inaccurate.
Body of essay analyzes chosen media very ineffectively.
Topic development may have been attempted, but does not form conclusions and/or fails to exhibit clear reasoning.
More support is needed. Some examples may be vague. Body of essay analyzes chosen media, perhaps ineffectively. Some irrelevant support may be present, but most evidence supports thesis.
Support is sufficient but perhaps flawed in some way.
Body of essay analyzes chosen media effectively.
Examples are sufficient. Thesis is supported and developed in most paragraphs.
Essay completely supports the thesis with logical arrangement ...
ENG 102 Media Analysis RubricPoints 2FPoints3D-DD+TanaMaeskm
ENG 102 Media Analysis Rubric
Points
2
F
Points
3
D-/D/D+
Points
3.5
C-/C/C+
Points
4
B-/B/B+
Points
5
A-/A/A+
Thesis & Focus
Thesis, focus on single element of media, central idea, audience, purpose, digressions
Lacks an identifiable thesis. Limited or no awareness of audience and purpose. Focus is unclear.
Readers cannot discern the essay’s central idea.
Thesis was attempted but unclear and/or inconsistently addressed.
Focus might be unclear or muddled between more than one part of chosen media.
Reveals limited awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea either lacking or inconsistently addressed.
Thesis is identifiable, but perhaps too narrow, too broad, or otherwise problematic. Focus is clear, but might be muddled between more than one part of chosen media. Awareness of audience and purpose may be adequate but inconsistent. Central idea is perhaps too general and supported by irrelevant examples.
Thesis is established and is consistently addressed throughout most of the paper. Focus is limited to ONE part of chosen media. Awareness of audience and purpose is sufficient. Central idea is clear and maintained in most of the essay.
Thesis is clearly established and maintained throughout the entire paper. Focus is limited to ONE part of chosen media. Paper demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea/focus maintained throughout.
Support & Development
Thesis support, thesis development, analysis of media, use of examples, logic, and reason
No support of thesis with relevant facts, examples, reasons, or evidence. Body of essay fails to analyze chosen media. Topic development is flawed or non-existent.
Support is minimal, logically flawed, and/or inaccurate.
Body of essay analyzes chosen media very ineffectively.
Topic development may have been attempted, but does not form conclusions and/or fails to exhibit clear reasoning.
More support is needed. Some examples may be vague. Body of essay analyzes chosen media, perhaps ineffectively. Some irrelevant support may be present, but most evidence supports thesis.
Support is sufficient but perhaps flawed in some way.
Body of essay analyzes chosen media effectively.
Examples are sufficient. Thesis is supported and developed in most paragraphs.
Essay completely supports the thesis with logical arrangement of evidence. Body of essay analyzes chosen media very effectively.
All assertions are supported and relate to thesis.
Coherence & Organization
Introduction, conclusion, body paragraphs, transitions, topic sentences
No clear introduction, body, or conclusion. Little-to-no transitions. Demonstrates little-to-no understanding of organization. Many sentences within paragraphs do not relate to each other and/or the paragraph’s topic. May contain no discernable topic sentences.
Introduction, body, and conclusion attempted but problematic. Few transitions. Perhaps numerous digressions. Mostly missing or problematic topic sentences. Demonstrates lit ...
1. Select a patient” (friend or family member) on whom to performSantosConleyha
1. Select a “patient” (friend or family member) on whom to perform a complete H&P.
2. NOTE: DO NOT USE REAL NAMES OR INITIALS OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFY YOUR “PATIENT.” FAILURE TO MAINTAIN PRIVACY WILL RESULT IN A FAILING SCORE.
3. Using the format specified below, write a 2 page SOAP note on your “patient.” The HPI should be presented in a paragraph, and the rest of the data including the ROS should be presented in a list format.
4. Collect only the information that is pertinent to the chief complaint of the patient to include in your SOAP note. Aim for a single page using normal margins and format.
5. The SOAP Note must contain all required elements as outlined in the rubric below.
6. You must self-score your SOAP note using the rubric and attach it to the assignment.
Criteria Ratings Points
Thread
Content
50 to >46.0 pts
Advanced
47 to 50 points All key
components of the
Discussion Board Forum
prompt are answered in
the thread. Major points
are supported by all of the
following: *Reading &
Study materials; *Pertinent,
conceptual, or personal
examples; *Thoughtful
analysis (considering
assumptions, analyzing
implications, and
comparing/contrasting
concepts); and *Source
citations in current APA
format, include the
required 7 or more from
personal research, the
course readings, and the
integration of 1 biblical
principle.
46 to >43.0 pts
Proficient
44 to 46 points Some key
components of the
Discussion Board Forum
prompt are answered in the
thread. Major points are
supported by some of the
following): *Reading &
Study materials; *Pertinent,
conceptual, or personal
examples; *Thoughtful
analysis (considering
assumptions, analyzing
implications, and
comparing/contrasting
concepts); and *Source
citations in current APA
format, include the required
7 or more from personal
research, the course
readings, and the
integration of 1 biblical
principle.
43 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Minimal key components of
the Discussion Board
Forum prompt are
answered in the thread.
Major points are supported
by some or none of the
following: *Reading &
Study materials; *Pertinent,
conceptual, or personal
examples; *Thoughtful
analysis (considering
assumptions, analyzing
implications, and
comparing/contrasting
concepts); and *Source
citations in current APA
format, include the required
7 or more from personal
research, the course
readings, and the
integration of 1 biblical
principle
0 pts
Not
Present
50 pts
Replies
Content
41 to >39.0 pts
Advanced
Contribution made to
discussion with each reply
expounding on the thread.
Major points are supported
by all of the following:
*Reading & Study
materials; *Pertinent,
conceptual, or personal
examples; *Thoughtful
analysis (considering
assumptions, analyzing
implications, and
comparing/contrasting
concepts); and *Three
peer-reviewed source
citations in current APA
format, and the integration
of 1 biblical principle.
39 to >35.0 pts
Proficient
Marginal contribution made
to discussion with each
reply slightly exp ...
1. Select a patient” (friend or family member) on whom to performAbbyWhyte974
1. Select a “patient” (friend or family member) on whom to perform a complete H&P.
2. NOTE: DO NOT USE REAL NAMES OR INITIALS OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFY YOUR “PATIENT.” FAILURE TO MAINTAIN PRIVACY WILL RESULT IN A FAILING SCORE.
3. Using the format specified below, write a 2 page SOAP note on your “patient.” The HPI should be presented in a paragraph, and the rest of the data including the ROS should be presented in a list format.
4. Collect only the information that is pertinent to the chief complaint of the patient to include in your SOAP note. Aim for a single page using normal margins and format.
5. The SOAP Note must contain all required elements as outlined in the rubric below.
6. You must self-score your SOAP note using the rubric and attach it to the assignment.
Criteria Ratings Points
Thread
Content
50 to >46.0 pts
Advanced
47 to 50 points All key
components of the
Discussion Board Forum
prompt are answered in
the thread. Major points
are supported by all of the
following: *Reading &
Study materials; *Pertinent,
conceptual, or personal
examples; *Thoughtful
analysis (considering
assumptions, analyzing
implications, and
comparing/contrasting
concepts); and *Source
citations in current APA
format, include the
required 7 or more from
personal research, the
course readings, and the
integration of 1 biblical
principle.
46 to >43.0 pts
Proficient
44 to 46 points Some key
components of the
Discussion Board Forum
prompt are answered in the
thread. Major points are
supported by some of the
following): *Reading &
Study materials; *Pertinent,
conceptual, or personal
examples; *Thoughtful
analysis (considering
assumptions, analyzing
implications, and
comparing/contrasting
concepts); and *Source
citations in current APA
format, include the required
7 or more from personal
research, the course
readings, and the
integration of 1 biblical
principle.
43 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Minimal key components of
the Discussion Board
Forum prompt are
answered in the thread.
Major points are supported
by some or none of the
following: *Reading &
Study materials; *Pertinent,
conceptual, or personal
examples; *Thoughtful
analysis (considering
assumptions, analyzing
implications, and
comparing/contrasting
concepts); and *Source
citations in current APA
format, include the required
7 or more from personal
research, the course
readings, and the
integration of 1 biblical
principle
0 pts
Not
Present
50 pts
Replies
Content
41 to >39.0 pts
Advanced
Contribution made to
discussion with each reply
expounding on the thread.
Major points are supported
by all of the following:
*Reading & Study
materials; *Pertinent,
conceptual, or personal
examples; *Thoughtful
analysis (considering
assumptions, analyzing
implications, and
comparing/contrasting
concepts); and *Three
peer-reviewed source
citations in current APA
format, and the integration
of 1 biblical principle.
39 to >35.0 pts
Proficient
Marginal contribution made
to discussion with each
reply slightly exp ...
1 Rubric for Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Researc.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
1
Rubric for Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Research Report
Unit: _________ Student name: ___________________ Student ID: ___________________ Project:_____ _________________________________ Marker:_______
Assessment criteria Fail < 50% Pass, 50 – 59% Credit, 60 – 69% Distinction, 70 – 79% High Distinction >80% Grade
(%)
WF
(%)
1 Introduction
Overview clearly presented
Key terms defined
Aim(s) of project clearly stated
Significance indicated
Overview missing
Definitions not provided
Aim(s) not stated
Significance of the project
not stated.
Overview inadequate
Some, but not all
definitions provided
Aim(s) stated, but require
more clarity
Significance unclear
Clear overview provided
All relevant definitions
provided
Aim(s) clearly stated.
Significance stated
Clear and
comprehensive
overview provided
All relevant
definitions provided.
Aims fully and
clearly stated
Significance clearly
stated
Clear and
comprehensive
overview provided
All relevant
definitions provided
Aims fully and clearly
stated.
Significance fully and
clearly stated
10
2 References to the
Literature/theoretical framework.
Literature fully up to date and
relevant to the project [No
significant literature omitted].
Appropriate balance achieved
between literature and the details
of the project.
Some references are used,
but relies on secondary
sources. Significant literature
omitted.
Insufficient/Overuse of
information from external
sources
Reference is made to the
relevant literature theory,
but no links are made with
the project AND/OR
Literature is not fully up to
date.
Some examples of
appropriate use of external
sources
Clear links are drawn
between the literature and
the significance of the
current project.
All relevant literature is
quoted appropriately
Literature is fully
up to date and is
fully and
appropriately linked
to the project
Reference to
external sources is
appropriate and
comprehensive
Covers all possible
aspects of the
literature
Aims of the current
project are critically
compared with
previous research
10
3 Methodology
Experimental procedure/modelling
approach/ data analysis
Fully appropriate to the aims of the
project
Sufficient detail provided here to be
able to replicate the project.
Incorrect details
Some basic concepts
misunderstood
Insufficient detail provided
Some incomplete
descriptions/inconsistent
information reported
Modelling/methodology
does not match the research
purpose/aims
Methodology is clearly and
accurately outlined.
Methodology/modelling
matches the research
purpose/aims
Methodology/mod
elling concisely
outlined with
attention to detail.
Description
provided in a
systematic way,
demonstrating a
sound ...
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerati.docxSUBHI7
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
15.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Ethical Considerations
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of n ...
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Consideratio.docxSUBHI7
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
15.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Ethical Considerations
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the cond ...
Signature AssignmentA ~5+ page single-spaced paper will incorpWilheminaRossi174
Signature Assignment
A ~5+ page single-spaced paper will incorporate global health issues and solutions through interventions to these issues. Choose any of the issues or diseases (or make your own up!) from the list below that are considered global public health problems. In the introduction, provide epidemiological information on the following: morbidity and mortality among the specific group, community, or country (not the USA). Discuss at least three interventions published in the scholarly literature to address the crisis in a country of your choice. Evaluate the progress and outcomes of such prevention programs. Describe the intervention (e.g. target audience, experimental/control group, intervention methods and materials, intervention outcomes) and assess the methods used in the intervention (e.g. level of the intervention, strengths and weaknesses of the intervention, potential impact/generalizability of the intervention).
· TB
· Malaria
· HIV/AIDS
· Access to water
· Water quality
· Air pollution
· Ebola
· Sanitation
· Cholera
· Climate change
· Healthcare
Total(40 points)
· PAGE ONE: Title page will have title, name, and NU affiliation. (1point)
· PAGE TWO: Abstract will provide an overview of what you determined within your paper. (4 points)
· PAGE THREE AND FOUR (OR MORE): Introduction to the topic of choice (one paragraph). (5 points)
· Methods and Discussion section including the methods you used for your literature view and all applicable intervention information. (10 points)
· Conclusion- summary of overall research, quality, and potential recommendations you would (or would not) make regarding this global health issue. (5 points)
· PAGE FIVE: Reference page (include at least 7 references primarily from peer-reviewed journals); exclusive of 3-5 page paper requirement. (10 points)
· APA formatting, grammar, structure, effort, overall professionalism of paper. (5 points)
Intervention example description:
The first intervention that I will discuss addressing Ebola outbreaks was conducted by Doctors without Borders in 1995 (Kerstein & Matthys, 1999). The intervention took place in Kikwit, Congo, which has approximately 200,000 inhabitants and two hospitals (Kikwit General Hospital and Kikwit II Hospital). The intervention actually occurred within the hospital setting, in an isolation ward. It was compared to a separate hospital in order to determine the intervention significance. The intervention included building an isolation ward specifically for Ebola patients with the use of trained CDC physicians to educate the local staff on and Ebola, cleaning, body burial, disinfection and antiseptic techniques, adequate water supply, a waste-disposal system, and usage of proper PPE (Kerstein & Matthys, 1999). Overall, the intervention was successful, though there were various strengths and weaknesses associated with it. The strengths were that it was a novel approach focusing on Ebola outbreaks and quarantine situations and ult ...
You will present information on the AAC Tobii Dynavox I Seri.docxlillie234567
You will present information on the AAC Tobii Dynavox I
Series device and SNAP Core First Software.
The following objectives should be met:
1. Identify the AAC Device and communication APP
2. Discuss/demonstrate its function, use specs, and the
population it is best suited for
3. Identify research, evidence of efficacy, list pros and
cons of the device/app
4. Use 3D visuals and video of demonstrating how it is
used
5. Steps the individual that it is best suited for needs to
take for improvement.
6. Roles of the speech pathologist and who they would
collaborate with.
7. Resources
8. At least 8-10 slides with slide transcript
.
TE
CH
46
0
M
od
ul
e
6
Im
p
le
m
e
n
ta
ti
o
n
P
la
n
Ru
br
ic
Cr
ite
ria
To
ta
l
In
cl
u
d
e
p
ro
b
le
m
s
ta
te
m
e
n
t
sl
id
e
f
ro
m
p
re
vi
o
u
s
d
e
li
ve
ra
b
le
1
0
In
cl
u
d
e
r
e
co
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
s
o
lu
ti
o
n
s
li
d
e
f
ro
m
p
re
vi
o
u
s
d
e
li
ve
ra
b
le
1
0
W
o
rk
B
re
a
kd
o
w
n
S
tr
u
ct
u
re
2
0
S
ch
e
d
u
le
2
0
S
o
lu
ti
o
n
v
a
li
d
a
ti
o
n
3
0
S
o
lu
ti
o
n
e
va
lu
a
ti
o
n
a
n
d
c
o
n
ti
n
u
o
u
s
im
p
ro
ve
m
e
n
t
3
0
Le
ga
l,
e
th
ic
a
l a
n
d
c
u
lt
u
ra
l c
o
n
si
d
e
ra
ti
o
n
s
3
0
To
ta
l
1
5
0
Pr
ob
le
m
S
ta
te
m
en
t
•S
up
po
rt
F
itb
it’
s a
dd
iti
on
o
f a
b
lo
od
p
re
ss
ur
e
m
on
ito
rin
g
ca
pa
bi
lit
y
th
ro
u
g
h
d
e
si
g
n
o
f
a
w
e
b
a
n
d
m
o
b
ile
a
p
p
u
se
r
in
te
rf
a
ce
w
it
h
t
h
e
fo
llo
w
in
g
f
e
a
tu
re
s:
•
D
is
p
la
y
b
lo
o
d
p
re
ss
u
re
r
e
a
d
in
g
s
n
u
m
e
ri
ca
ll
y
a
n
d
g
ra
p
h
ic
a
ll
y
•
Tr
a
ck
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
o
ve
r
ti
m
e
•
Id
e
n
ti
fy
lo
w
/h
ig
h
r
e
a
d
in
g
s
a
n
d
t
re
n
d
s
th
a
t
m
a
y
in
d
ic
a
te
h
e
a
lt
h
c
o
n
ce
rn
s
Re
co
m
m
en
de
d
So
lu
tio
n
•W
e
b
si
te
p
lu
s
p
la
tf
o
rm
-s
p
e
ci
fi
c
e
xt
e
n
si
o
n
s
to
e
xi
st
in
g
a
p
p
s
•J
u
st
if
ic
a
ti
o
n
•
In
te
g
ra
ti
o
n
w
it
h
e
xi
st
in
g
F
it
b
it
a
p
p
s
is
t
o
p
p
ri
o
ri
ty
•
U
se
rs
w
il
l n
o
t
w
a
n
t
to
d
o
w
n
lo
a
d
a
s
e
p
a
ra
te
a
p
p
j
u
st
f
o
r
B
P
m
o
n
it
o
ri
n
g
•
U
se
rs
w
il
l w
a
n
t
to
v
ie
w
B
P
d
a
ta
in
c
o
n
te
xt
w
it
h
o
th
e
r
h
e
a
lt
h
a
n
d
f
it
n
e
ss
d
a
ta
•
V
a
lu
e
o
f
in
te
g
ra
ti
o
n
ju
st
if
ie
s
h
ig
h
e
r
d
e
ve
lo
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
m
a
in
te
n
a
n
ce
c
o
st
s
W
or
k
Br
ea
kd
ow
n
St
ru
ct
ur
e
•
A
n
a
ly
si
s
•
D
ra
ft
r
e
q
u
ir
e
m
e
n
ts
s
p
e
ci
fi
ca
ti
o
n
•
R
e
vi
e
w
a
n
d
a
p
p
ro
ve
r
e
q
u
ir
e
m
e
n
ts
•
C
ro
ss
-p
la
tf
o
rm
d
e
si
g
n
•
C
o
m
p
le
te
c
o
m
m
o
n
U
X
d
e
si
g
n
•
D
e
si
g
n
c
li
e
n
t-
si
d
e
s
o
ft
w
a
re
•
W
e
b
a
p
p
d
e
ve
lo
p
m
e
n
t
•
A
d
a
p
t
co
m
m
o
n
U
X
d
e
si
g
n
f
o
r
w
e
b
•
C
o
d
e
H
T
M
L/
C
S
S
fo
r
w
e
b
a
p
p
•
C
o
d
e
J
a
va
S
cr
ip
t
fo
r
w
e
b
a
p
p
•
In
te
g
ra
te
w
it
h
c
lo
u
d
A
P
I
•
In
te
g
ra
te
w
it
h
e
xi
st
in
g
w
e
b
si
te
•
Te
st
w
e
b
a
p
p
•
iO
S
a
p
p
d
e
ve
lo
p
m
e
n
t
•
A
d
a
p
t
co
m
m
o
n
U
X
d
e
si
g
n
f
o
r
iO
S
•
C
o
d
e
iO
S
a
p
p
•
In
te
g
ra
te
w
it
h
w
e
a
ra
b
le
d
e
vi
ce
A
P
I
•
In
te
g
ra
te
w
it
h
c
lo
u
d
A
P
I
•
In
te.
More Related Content
Similar to Research project step #4 Final PaperHide Assignment Informati.docx
Leadership for Practical Nursing Assignment Rubric Utilization .docxDIPESH30
Leadership for Practical Nursing Assignment Rubric: Utilization of a Nursing Theory (45% of PNUR2300 grade)
Category
Mark
Above Standard
Expected Standard
Approaching Standard
F- Below Standard
Score
Organization
5
Engaging introduction and thoughtful conclusion.
Purpose of paper clearly identified
Logical focused presentation of well developed ideas
Smooth flow of ideas
Significant details evident
A+ 4.5-5/5 A 4-4.5/5
Effective introduction and conclusion.
Purpose of paper included
Main ideas are straightforward
Transition of ideas between paragraphs is evident.
Relevant details
B+ 3.75-3.9/5 B 3.5-3.75/5
Introduction and conclusion are lacking in clarity
Discernible purpose statement, but inadequate development
Ideas and purposes are recognizable but simple
Transitions not always smooth
Adequate detail
C+ 3.25-3.4/5
Introduction and conclusion weak, vague or cursory
No purpose statement included
Main points are not clear or not logically developed.
Transitions are lacking in clarity
Some appropriate details, some inadequate information present
< 3.25/5 Below 65%
Content
1.
Identification of Issue
10
Parameters of content clearly identified.
Perceptive, sure grasp of the issue
A sense of completeness about the handling of the issue
Assignment criteria are met with depth and/or creativity demonstrated.
A+ 9.0-10/10 A 8.0-9.0/10
Parameters of content are evident.
Good grasp of issue
Careful presentation of evidence, accurately documented
Assignment criteria are met.
B+ 7.5-7.9/10 B 7.0-7.4/10
Parameters of the content are identified but reflect a lack of understanding of issue
Adequate grasp of issue
Documentation or evidence is present, but awkwardly or routinely handled
Not all assignment criteria are met; minor gaps are evident
C+ 6.5-6.9/10
Some attempt to supply evidence or to document content
Weak grasp of issue
No clear development of issue, issue superficially covered.
Not all assignment criteria are met; many gaps are evident
< 6.4/10 Below 65%
2.
Utilization & Application of Theorist
10
Parameters of content clearly identified.
Perceptive, sure grasp of theory utilization
A sense of completeness about the theory application
Identification of metaparadigm is met with depth
A+ 9.0-10/10 A 8.0-9.0/10
Parameters of content are evident.
Good grasp of theory utilization
Careful presentation of theory application is evident and accurately documented
Identification of metaparadigm is met.
B+ 7.5-7.9/10 B 7.0-7.4/10
Parameters of the content are identified but reflect a lack of understanding
Adequate grasp of theory utilization
Documentation or evidence of theory application is present ...
#35537 Topic Course Project Part 3—Translating Evidence Into Pra.docxAASTHA76
#35537 Topic: Course Project: Part 3—Translating Evidence Into Practice. Continuation of the assignment attached
Number of Pages: 3 (Double Spaced)
Number of sources: 3
Writing Style: APA
Type of document: Coursework
Academic Level:Master
Category: Nursing
VIP Support: N/A
Language Style: English (U.S.)
Order Instructions: Attached
In Part 3 of the Course Project, you consider how the evidence you gathered during Part 2 can be translated into nursing practice.
Now that you have located available research on your PICOT question, you will examine what the research indicates about nursing practices. Connecting research evidence and findings to actual decisions and tasks that nurses complete in their daily practice is essentially what evidence-based practice is all about. This final component of the Course Project asks you to translate the evidence and data from your literature review into authentic practices that can be adopted to improve health care outcomes. In addition, you will also consider possible methods and strategies for disseminating evidence-based practices to your colleagues and to the broader health care field.
To prepare:
Consider Parts 1 and 2 of your Course Project. How does the research address your PICOT question?
With your PICOT question in mind, identify at least one nursing practice that is supported by the evidence in two or more of the articles from your literature review. Consider what the evidence indicates about how this practice contributes to better outcomes.
Explore possible consequences of failing to adopt the evidence-based practice that you identified.
Consider how you would disseminate information about this evidence-based practice throughout your organization or practice setting. How would you communicate the importance of the practice?
To complete:
In a 3- to 4-page paper:
Restate your PICOT question and its significance to nursing practice.
Summarize the findings from the articles you selected for your literature review. Describe at least one nursing practice that is supported by the evidence in the articles. Justify your response with specific references to at least 2 of the articles.
Explain how the evidence-based practice that you identified contributes to better outcomes. In addition, identify potential negative outcomes that could result from failing to use the evidence-based practice.
Outline the strategy for disseminating the evidence-based practice that you identified throughout your practice setting. Explain how you would communicate the importance of the practice to your colleagues. Describe how you would move from disseminating the information to implementing the evidence-based practice within your organization. How would you address concerns and opposition to the change in practice?It should be combined with the other two components of the Course Project and turned in as your Portfolio Assignment for this course.
IMPORTANT
Reminder: The School of Nursing requires th.
the purpose of this paper is to address the following clinic.docxhelen23456789
the purpose of this paper is to address the following clinical scenario with the use of your textbook, external credible literature, and/or reliable electronic sources. Use the guide below to draft your paper and review the rubric to ensure you have met the assignment criteria. The expected length of the paper is 4-5 pages, which does not include the cover page and reference page(s).
Lisa Anderson, a 22 y.o., Caucasian single parent, is referred for genetic counseling by her pediatric Nurse Practitioner. She has a 3-year-old boy with developmental delay and small joint hyperextensibility. The pediatric Nurse Practitioner has diagnosed fragile X-associated mental retardation. She is currently pregnant with her second child at 14 weeks of gestation. The family history is unremarkable.
Please use the following headings/subheadings as a guide to draft your paper:
Introduction (including a brief purpose statement)
Identify the genetic mutation responsible for fragile X-associated mental retardation.
Describe and discuss how it causes the clinical syndrome of developmental delay, joint hyperextensibility, large testes, and facial abnormalities.
Identify which parent is the probable carrier of the genetic mutation?
Explain why this parent and the grandparents are phenotypically unaffected.
Discuss the likelihood that the unborn child will be affected?
VII. Conclusion
I
n regard to APA format, please use the following as a guide:
Include a cover page and running head (this is not part of the 4–5-page limit)
Include transitions in your paper (i.e., headings or subheadings)
Use in-text references throughout the paper
Use double space, 12-point Times New Roman font
Spelling, grammar, and organization are appropriate
Include a reference list (this is not part of the 4–5-page limit)
Attempt to use primary sources only. That said, you may cite reliable electronic sources (i.e., ANA)
·
Assignment 1 Rubric
Criteria
60 Points
55 Points
50 Points
40 Points
Earned Points
Content: Application & Analysis
Responds correctly and/or appropriately to all questions and criteria. Content is excellent.
Demonstrates a high level of critical thinking, shows significant insight or creative thought about the topic, and does not merely recite the text/resources. Uses concepts and terminology correctly. Detail rich and specific.
Responds correctly and/or appropriately to all questions and criteria. Content is good.
Demonstrates some critical thinking throughout the paper and may also show some insight or creative thinking about the topic. Mostly uses concepts and terminology correctly (1-2 issues). Minor detail inconsistencies (1-2).
Responds correctly and/or appropriately to at least one question OR if only one question, partially responds to question. Does not address all criteria. Content is minimal.
Demonstrates at least one critic.
Portfolio Assignment The Role of the Nurse Informaticist in Syste.docxstilliegeorgiana
Portfolio Assignment: The Role of the Nurse Informaticist in Systems Development and Implementation
Assume you are a nurse manager on a unit where a new nursing documentation system is to be implemented. You want to ensure that the system will be usable and acceptable for the nurses impacted. You realize a nurse leader must be on the implementation team.
To Prepare:
· Review the steps of the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) and reflect on the scenario presented.
· Consider the benefits and challenges associated with involving a nurse leader on an implementation team for health information technology.
The Assignment: (2-3 pages)
In preparation of filling this role, develop a 2- to 3-page role description for a graduate-level nurse to guide his/her participation on the implementation team. The role description should be based on the SDLC stages and tasks and should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each of the following steps:
· Planning and requirements definition
· Analysis
· Design of the new system
· Implementation
· Post-implementation support
· Let your citations match your references
Submit your completed Role Description.
Submission and Grading Information
· RUBRIC
· Develop a 2- to 3-page role description for a graduate-level nurse to guide his/her participation on the implementation team. The role description should be based on the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) stages and tasks and should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each of the following steps:
· Planning and requirements definition
· Analysis
· Design of the new system
· Implementation
· Post-implementation support
77 (77%) - 85 (85%)
An accurate and fully developed role description is provided for the Assignment and fully supports the guidance of a graduate-level nurse's participation in the steps of the SDLC.
The responses accurately and thoroughly define in detail a graduate-level nurse's participation in the steps of the SDLC.
The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail the impacts of a graduate-level nurse's participation in the steps of the SDLC.
68 (68%) - 76 (76%)
A role description is provided for the Assignment and supports the guidance of a graduate-level nurse's participation in the steps of the SDLC.
The responses define a graduate-level nurse's participation in the steps of the SDLC.
The responses explain the impact of the graduate-level nurse's participation in the steps of the SDLC.
60 (60%) - 67 (67%)
A vague or inaccurate role description is provided for the Assignment and vaguely or inaccurately provides guidance to a graduate-level nurse's participation in the steps of the SDLC.
The responses defining the graduate-level nurse's participation in the steps of the SDLC are vague or inaccurate.
The responses explaining the impact of the graduate-level nurse's participation in the steps of the SDLC are vague or inaccurate.
0 (0%) - 59 (59%)
A vague and inac ...
Case Study 1 1Unsatisfactory 0-710.00 2Less Than Sat.docxwendolynhalbert
Case Study 1
1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
40.0 %Accurate identification of anemia classification and rationale.
Identification of anemia classification and rationale is not offered.
Identification of anemia classification and rationale is offered, but incomplete, lacking relevant information, such as rationale.
Identification of anemia classification and rationale meets the basic requirements of the assignment.
Identification of anemia classification and rationale is offered in detail.
Identification of anemia classification and rationale is offered in detail, while demonstrating evidence of deeper insight and/or reflection.
40.0 %Explanation of patient diagnosis with rationale from case findings. Outside sources and/or medical and nursing references used to support conclusions.
Explanation of patient diagnosis is not offered.
Explanation of patient diagnosis is offered, but incomplete, lacking relevant information, or does not provide outside sources and/or medical and nursing references to support conclusions.
Explanation of patient diagnosis uses outside sources and/or medical and nursing references to support conclusions, and meets the basic requirements of the assignment.
Explanation of patient diagnosis uses outside sources and/or medical and nursing references to support conclusions and is offered in detail.
Explanation of patient diagnosis uses outside sources and/or medical and nursing references to support conclusions and is offered in detail, while demonstrating evidence of deeper insight and/or reflection.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of arguments and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs apparent. Paragraphs exhibit unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to ...
Among the Resources in this module is the Rutherford (2008) articl.docxgreg1eden90113
Among the Resources in this module is the Rutherford (2008) article Standardized Nursing Language: What Does It Mean for Nursing Practice? In this article, the author recounts a visit to a local hospital to view the recent implementation of a new coding system.
During the visit, one of the nurses commented to her, “We document our care using standardized nursing languages but we don’t fully understand why we do” (Rutherford, 2008, para. 1).
How would you respond to a comment such as this one?
To Prepare:
· Review the concepts of informatics as presented in the Resources, particularly Rutherford, M. (2008) Standardized Nursing Language: What Does It Mean for Nursing Practice?
· Reflect on the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
· Consider how knowledge may be informed by data that is collected/accessed.
The Assignment:
In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:
· Explain how you would inform this nurse (and others) of the importance of standardized nursing terminologies.
· Describe the benefits and challenges of implementing standardized nursing terminologies in nursing practice. Be specific and provide examples.
· Be sure to support your paper with peer-reviewed research on standardized nursing terminologies that you consulted from the Walden Library.
Rutherford, M. A. (2008). Standardized nursing language: What does it mean for nursing practice? Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 13(1), 1–12. doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol13No01PPT05.
RUBIC
In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:
· Explain how you would inform this nurse (and others) of the importance of standardized nursing terminologies.
· Describe the benefits and challenges of implementing standardized nursing terminologies in nursing practice. Be specific and provide examples.
· Be sure to support your paper with peer-reviewed research on standardized nursing terminologies that you consulted from the Walden Library.--
Excellent 77 (77%) - 85 (85%)
The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail how to inform the nurse in the scenario, as well as others, on the importance of standardized nursing terminologies.
The responses accurately and thoroughly describe in detail the benefits and challenges of implementing standardized nursing terminologies in nursing practice, with sufficient supporting evidence and detailed examples.
Responses are fully supported as evidenced by 3 or more accurate, peer-reviewed research sources on standardized nursing terminologies.
Good 68 (68%) - 76 (76%)
The responses accurately explain how to inform the nurse in the scenario, as well as other, on the importance of standardized nursing terminologies.
The responses accurately describe the benefits and challenges of implementing standardized nursing terminologies in nursing practice, with some supporting evidence and examples.
Response are supported as evidenced by 2 or more accurate, peer-reviewed research sources on standardized nursing ter.
Discussion question
Discussion: Cardiovascular Alterations
At least once a year, the media report on a seemingly healthy teenage athlete collapsing during a sports game and dying of heart complications. These incidents continue to outline the importance of physical exams and health screenings for teenagers, especially those who play sports. During these health screenings, examiners check for cardiovascular alterations such as heart murmurs because they can be a sign of an underlying heart disorder. Since many heart alterations rarely have symptoms, they are easy to miss if health professionals are not specifically looking for them. Once cardiovascular alterations are identified in patients, it is important to refer them to specialists who can further investigate the cause.
Consider the following scenario:
A 16-year-old male presents for a sports participation examination. He has no significant medical history and no family history suggestive of risk for premature cardiac death. The patient is examined while sitting slightly recumbent on the exam table and the advanced practice nurse appreciates a grade II/VI systolic murmur heard loudest at the apex of the heart. Other physical findings are within normal limits, the patient denies any cardiovascular symptoms, and a neuromuscular examination is within normal limits. He is cleared with no activity restriction. Later in the season he collapses on the field and dies.
To Prepare
· Review the scenario provided, as well as Chapter 25 in the Huether and McCance text. Consider how you would diagnose and prescribe treatment for the patient.
· Select one of the following patient factors: genetics, ethnicity, or behavior. Reflect on how the factor you selected might impact diagnosis and prescription of treatment for the patient in the scenario.
By Day 3
Post a description of how you would diagnose and prescribe treatment for the patient in the scenario. Then explain how the factor you selected might impact the diagnosis and prescription of treatment for that patient.
Rubric to follow
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Proficient Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
44 (44%) - 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
40 (40%) - 43 (43%)
Responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
35 (35%) - 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion questi ...
Argumentative Essayby mutiu OlokodanaSubmission date 28.docxfestockton
Argumentative Essay
by mutiu Olokodana
Submission date: 28-Jan-2020 02:37AM (UTC-0500)
Submission ID: 1247589300
File name: temp_turnitintool_600359574.DoesTechnologyPromoteLoneliness.docx (18.59K)
Word count: 841
Character count: 4498
10. Recycled
42%
SIMILARITY INDEX
9%
INTERNET SOURCES
5%
PUBLICATIONS
42%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 29%
2 5%
3 3%
4 2%
5 1%
6 1%
7 1%
Argumentative Essay
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Submitted to Straighterline
Student Paper
Submitted to University of North Carolina -
Wilmington
Student Paper
Submitted to Cave Creek Unified District
Student Paper
Submitted to Saint Paul College
Student Paper
Submitted to Squalicum High School
Student Paper
Submitted to Grant MacEwan Community
College
Student Paper
Submitted to American Public University System
Student Paper
Exclude quotes Off
Exclude bibliography Off
Exclude matches Off
QM
FINAL GRADE
0/100
Argumentative Essay
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
PAGE 1
10. Recycled
Unfortunately, your essay is reworded from a paper that was already submitted to Straighterline or
another university. This is a type of plagiarism called recycling, which is unacceptable by
Straighterline policy. Therefore, you will need to completely rewrite a new essay with a new topic in
order for a submission under this assignment to be accepted and graded.
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
RUBRIC: ENG101 V6:ARGUMENTATIVE FINAL
THESIS (20%)
POINTS
(0)
POINTS
(2)
POINTS
(3)
POINTS
(3.50)
POINTS
(4)
POINTS
(5)
SUPPORT & DEV (15%)
POINTS
(0)
POINTS
(2)
POINTS
(3)
POINTS
(3.50)
0 / 5
0 / 5
Thesis, central idea, audience, purpose, digressions
Thesis or potential thesis is neither present in any portion of the essay, nor is it implied in
any manner. Thesis may be present but incorrect for the assignment’s
objectives/approach. Thesis may be present but the submission overall fails to meet most
assignment objectives (such as the essay is only a paragraph) that determining the thesis’
viability is problematic.
Lacks an identifiable thesis. Limited or no awareness of audience and purpose. Readers
cannot discern the essay’s central idea.
Thesis was attempted but unclear and/or inconsistently addressed. Reveals limited
awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea either lacking or inconsistently
addressed.
Thesis is identifiable, but perhaps too narrow, too broad, or otherwise problematic.
Awareness of audience may be adequate but inconsistent. Central idea is perhaps too
general and supported by irrelevant examples.
Thesis is established and is consistently addressed throughout most of the paper.
Awareness of audience is sufficient. Central idea is clear and maintained in most of the
essay.
Thesis is clearly established and maintained throughout the entire paper. Paper
demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea/focus
maintained throughout.
0 / 5
Thesis support, thesis development, use of examples, logic, ...
School of Nursing FNP MSN5300 Advanced Nursing Inquiry and.docxlillie234567
School of Nursing FNP
MSN5300 Advanced Nursing Inquiry
and Evidence-Based Practice
Purpose
· The purpose of this assignment is to create a presentation on critical appraisal of quantitative research article to evaluate its trustworthiness and its value to nursing.
Course Outcomes
· Apply the research process to improve evidence based clinical practice and contribute to knowledge development.
· Explain to a variety of audiences the evidence based for practice decisions, including the credibility of sources of information and the relevance to the practice problem confronted.
Program Learning Outcomes
· Integrate nursing and related sciences into the delivery of care to clients across diverse healthcare settings.
· Relate information and communication technologies to document and improve health outcomes.
· Employ collaborative interprofessional strategies for improving client and population health outcomes.
· Relate knowledge of illness and disease management to providing evidence-based care to clients, communities, and vulnerable populations in an evolving healthcare delivery system.
Due Date: Submit to the Moodle by Saturday of the end Week 14 at 11:59 p.m. ET.
Points: This assignment is worth a total of 100 points.
Requirements
· To complete this assignment, you will need to access the Miami Regional University virtual library database: CINAHL Complete Database, MEDLINE Complete Database, LIRN, and so forth. Our Librarian is available to help on campus from Monday to Friday 7:30 am to 9:00 pm & Saturday 8:00 am to 3:00 pm.
Remember we now also have a Ask a Librarian option 7 days a week available in Moodle.
· This assignment is worth 100 points and will be graded on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric. This assignment will be graded on quality of information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria and rubric.
· APA format and effective writing is required for this assignment.
· Create your presentation using the version of Microsoft PowerPoint. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS PowerPoint document because it will end in” pptx”.
·
Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about this presentation may be posted under the Q & A Forum.
· The length of the project report is to be
no greater than 20 slides, excluding the title and reference slide.
· This presentation will be submitted through Turnitin, a Turnitin similarity score of 20% or less is expected.
·
A minimum of 6 current scholarly references that are 5 years old or less.
· The textbook required for this course may be used as a reference for this assignment but does not count towards the required minimum number of scholarly references.
.
Module 1: Master's Prepared Nurse Interview Guide
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Less Than Satisfactory
3: Satisfactory
4: Good
5: Excellent
% Scaling
0%
80%
88%
92%
100%
Content – 70%
Introduction
5%
Introduction lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Introduction is insufficiently developed and/or vague. Purpose is not clear.
Introduction is clear, forecasting development of the paper.
Introduction is comprehensive; purpose of the paper is present.
Introduction is comprehensive and makes the purpose of the paper clear by restating the thesis.
Career
Overview
15%
Omits major elements and is disorganized.
Describes but fails to paint a clear picture of the nurse's career and/or progression in a logical order.
Addresses most of the primary elements of the individual's career in a logical fashion.
Addresses the primary elements. Reader can easily see purpose.
Thoroughly presents all of the information to portray a clear chronology as well as richness of detail.
Graduate
Education
15%
Omits major elements; is disorganized; and has no depth or detail.
Describes but fails to address some of the elements; lacks depth and detail.
Addresses the same elements but lacks depth and detail.
Necessary elements are present and clearly presented. Decision-making process is evident to the reader.
Thoroughly presents the process that led to the decision to seek graduate education as well as the program itself with clarity, order, and depth.
Present
Position (includes pearls of wisdom)
20%
Omits major elements; information is tangential and disorganized.
Describes but fails to address most of the primary elements in any depth.
Addresses most of the primary elements of the present position with recognition of competencies but lacks detail.
All key elements are presented with clarity.
Thoroughly presents all of the key elements of the present position with emphasis on competencies required. Describes in rich detail, and includes advice given and original insights.
Conclusion
15%
Conclusion lacks any discernible purpose.
Conclusion is insufficiently developed and/or vague.
Conclusion is clear and identifies key points of interview but fails to draw inferences.
Conclusion is clearly evident to the reader. Career opportunities are present.
Conclusion is comprehensive; paints a clear picture of the potential outcomes and career opportunities of graduate education; identifies key points of the interview; and demonstrates insight and interpretation.
Organization and Effectiveness – 20%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7%
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are com ...
1. From the breadth and depth of the economic downturn, it was cle.docxjeremylockett77
1. From the breadth and depth of the economic downturn, it was clear that no one single policy action would address the problem. Briefly discuss how the various actions taken by the Treasury and the Fed served to work together or possibly against one another to address the problems.
2. How did the backgrounds of both Geithner and Bernanke serve to assist or hinder them in understanding and acting to solve the problems?
3. "The biggest problem we now face is how the Treasury and Fed can withdraw from the heavy level of financial support that they’ve provided without plunging the economy back into a recession." Please comment on this proposition.
ENG 102 Media Analysis Rubric
Points
2
F
Points
3
D-/D/D+
Points
3.5
C-/C/C+
Points
4
B-/B/B+
Points
5
A-/A/A+
Thesis & Focus
Thesis, focus on single element of media, central idea, audience, purpose, digressions
Lacks an identifiable thesis. Limited or no awareness of audience and purpose. Focus is unclear.
Readers cannot discern the essay’s central idea.
Thesis was attempted but unclear and/or inconsistently addressed.
Focus might be unclear or muddled between more than one part of chosen media.
Reveals limited awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea either lacking or inconsistently addressed.
Thesis is identifiable, but perhaps too narrow, too broad, or otherwise problematic. Focus is clear, but might be muddled between more than one part of chosen media. Awareness of audience and purpose may be adequate but inconsistent. Central idea is perhaps too general and supported by irrelevant examples.
Thesis is established and is consistently addressed throughout most of the paper. Focus is limited to ONE part of chosen media. Awareness of audience and purpose is sufficient. Central idea is clear and maintained in most of the essay.
Thesis is clearly established and maintained throughout the entire paper. Focus is limited to ONE part of chosen media. Paper demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea/focus maintained throughout.
Support & Development
Thesis support, thesis development, analysis of media, use of examples, logic, and reason
No support of thesis with relevant facts, examples, reasons, or evidence. Body of essay fails to analyze chosen media. Topic development is flawed or non-existent.
Support is minimal, logically flawed, and/or inaccurate.
Body of essay analyzes chosen media very ineffectively.
Topic development may have been attempted, but does not form conclusions and/or fails to exhibit clear reasoning.
More support is needed. Some examples may be vague. Body of essay analyzes chosen media, perhaps ineffectively. Some irrelevant support may be present, but most evidence supports thesis.
Support is sufficient but perhaps flawed in some way.
Body of essay analyzes chosen media effectively.
Examples are sufficient. Thesis is supported and developed in most paragraphs.
Essay completely supports the thesis with logical arrangement ...
ENG 102 Media Analysis RubricPoints 2FPoints3D-DD+TanaMaeskm
ENG 102 Media Analysis Rubric
Points
2
F
Points
3
D-/D/D+
Points
3.5
C-/C/C+
Points
4
B-/B/B+
Points
5
A-/A/A+
Thesis & Focus
Thesis, focus on single element of media, central idea, audience, purpose, digressions
Lacks an identifiable thesis. Limited or no awareness of audience and purpose. Focus is unclear.
Readers cannot discern the essay’s central idea.
Thesis was attempted but unclear and/or inconsistently addressed.
Focus might be unclear or muddled between more than one part of chosen media.
Reveals limited awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea either lacking or inconsistently addressed.
Thesis is identifiable, but perhaps too narrow, too broad, or otherwise problematic. Focus is clear, but might be muddled between more than one part of chosen media. Awareness of audience and purpose may be adequate but inconsistent. Central idea is perhaps too general and supported by irrelevant examples.
Thesis is established and is consistently addressed throughout most of the paper. Focus is limited to ONE part of chosen media. Awareness of audience and purpose is sufficient. Central idea is clear and maintained in most of the essay.
Thesis is clearly established and maintained throughout the entire paper. Focus is limited to ONE part of chosen media. Paper demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea/focus maintained throughout.
Support & Development
Thesis support, thesis development, analysis of media, use of examples, logic, and reason
No support of thesis with relevant facts, examples, reasons, or evidence. Body of essay fails to analyze chosen media. Topic development is flawed or non-existent.
Support is minimal, logically flawed, and/or inaccurate.
Body of essay analyzes chosen media very ineffectively.
Topic development may have been attempted, but does not form conclusions and/or fails to exhibit clear reasoning.
More support is needed. Some examples may be vague. Body of essay analyzes chosen media, perhaps ineffectively. Some irrelevant support may be present, but most evidence supports thesis.
Support is sufficient but perhaps flawed in some way.
Body of essay analyzes chosen media effectively.
Examples are sufficient. Thesis is supported and developed in most paragraphs.
Essay completely supports the thesis with logical arrangement of evidence. Body of essay analyzes chosen media very effectively.
All assertions are supported and relate to thesis.
Coherence & Organization
Introduction, conclusion, body paragraphs, transitions, topic sentences
No clear introduction, body, or conclusion. Little-to-no transitions. Demonstrates little-to-no understanding of organization. Many sentences within paragraphs do not relate to each other and/or the paragraph’s topic. May contain no discernable topic sentences.
Introduction, body, and conclusion attempted but problematic. Few transitions. Perhaps numerous digressions. Mostly missing or problematic topic sentences. Demonstrates lit ...
1. Select a patient” (friend or family member) on whom to performSantosConleyha
1. Select a “patient” (friend or family member) on whom to perform a complete H&P.
2. NOTE: DO NOT USE REAL NAMES OR INITIALS OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFY YOUR “PATIENT.” FAILURE TO MAINTAIN PRIVACY WILL RESULT IN A FAILING SCORE.
3. Using the format specified below, write a 2 page SOAP note on your “patient.” The HPI should be presented in a paragraph, and the rest of the data including the ROS should be presented in a list format.
4. Collect only the information that is pertinent to the chief complaint of the patient to include in your SOAP note. Aim for a single page using normal margins and format.
5. The SOAP Note must contain all required elements as outlined in the rubric below.
6. You must self-score your SOAP note using the rubric and attach it to the assignment.
Criteria Ratings Points
Thread
Content
50 to >46.0 pts
Advanced
47 to 50 points All key
components of the
Discussion Board Forum
prompt are answered in
the thread. Major points
are supported by all of the
following: *Reading &
Study materials; *Pertinent,
conceptual, or personal
examples; *Thoughtful
analysis (considering
assumptions, analyzing
implications, and
comparing/contrasting
concepts); and *Source
citations in current APA
format, include the
required 7 or more from
personal research, the
course readings, and the
integration of 1 biblical
principle.
46 to >43.0 pts
Proficient
44 to 46 points Some key
components of the
Discussion Board Forum
prompt are answered in the
thread. Major points are
supported by some of the
following): *Reading &
Study materials; *Pertinent,
conceptual, or personal
examples; *Thoughtful
analysis (considering
assumptions, analyzing
implications, and
comparing/contrasting
concepts); and *Source
citations in current APA
format, include the required
7 or more from personal
research, the course
readings, and the
integration of 1 biblical
principle.
43 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Minimal key components of
the Discussion Board
Forum prompt are
answered in the thread.
Major points are supported
by some or none of the
following: *Reading &
Study materials; *Pertinent,
conceptual, or personal
examples; *Thoughtful
analysis (considering
assumptions, analyzing
implications, and
comparing/contrasting
concepts); and *Source
citations in current APA
format, include the required
7 or more from personal
research, the course
readings, and the
integration of 1 biblical
principle
0 pts
Not
Present
50 pts
Replies
Content
41 to >39.0 pts
Advanced
Contribution made to
discussion with each reply
expounding on the thread.
Major points are supported
by all of the following:
*Reading & Study
materials; *Pertinent,
conceptual, or personal
examples; *Thoughtful
analysis (considering
assumptions, analyzing
implications, and
comparing/contrasting
concepts); and *Three
peer-reviewed source
citations in current APA
format, and the integration
of 1 biblical principle.
39 to >35.0 pts
Proficient
Marginal contribution made
to discussion with each
reply slightly exp ...
1. Select a patient” (friend or family member) on whom to performAbbyWhyte974
1. Select a “patient” (friend or family member) on whom to perform a complete H&P.
2. NOTE: DO NOT USE REAL NAMES OR INITIALS OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFY YOUR “PATIENT.” FAILURE TO MAINTAIN PRIVACY WILL RESULT IN A FAILING SCORE.
3. Using the format specified below, write a 2 page SOAP note on your “patient.” The HPI should be presented in a paragraph, and the rest of the data including the ROS should be presented in a list format.
4. Collect only the information that is pertinent to the chief complaint of the patient to include in your SOAP note. Aim for a single page using normal margins and format.
5. The SOAP Note must contain all required elements as outlined in the rubric below.
6. You must self-score your SOAP note using the rubric and attach it to the assignment.
Criteria Ratings Points
Thread
Content
50 to >46.0 pts
Advanced
47 to 50 points All key
components of the
Discussion Board Forum
prompt are answered in
the thread. Major points
are supported by all of the
following: *Reading &
Study materials; *Pertinent,
conceptual, or personal
examples; *Thoughtful
analysis (considering
assumptions, analyzing
implications, and
comparing/contrasting
concepts); and *Source
citations in current APA
format, include the
required 7 or more from
personal research, the
course readings, and the
integration of 1 biblical
principle.
46 to >43.0 pts
Proficient
44 to 46 points Some key
components of the
Discussion Board Forum
prompt are answered in the
thread. Major points are
supported by some of the
following): *Reading &
Study materials; *Pertinent,
conceptual, or personal
examples; *Thoughtful
analysis (considering
assumptions, analyzing
implications, and
comparing/contrasting
concepts); and *Source
citations in current APA
format, include the required
7 or more from personal
research, the course
readings, and the
integration of 1 biblical
principle.
43 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Minimal key components of
the Discussion Board
Forum prompt are
answered in the thread.
Major points are supported
by some or none of the
following: *Reading &
Study materials; *Pertinent,
conceptual, or personal
examples; *Thoughtful
analysis (considering
assumptions, analyzing
implications, and
comparing/contrasting
concepts); and *Source
citations in current APA
format, include the required
7 or more from personal
research, the course
readings, and the
integration of 1 biblical
principle
0 pts
Not
Present
50 pts
Replies
Content
41 to >39.0 pts
Advanced
Contribution made to
discussion with each reply
expounding on the thread.
Major points are supported
by all of the following:
*Reading & Study
materials; *Pertinent,
conceptual, or personal
examples; *Thoughtful
analysis (considering
assumptions, analyzing
implications, and
comparing/contrasting
concepts); and *Three
peer-reviewed source
citations in current APA
format, and the integration
of 1 biblical principle.
39 to >35.0 pts
Proficient
Marginal contribution made
to discussion with each
reply slightly exp ...
1 Rubric for Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Researc.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
1
Rubric for Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Research Report
Unit: _________ Student name: ___________________ Student ID: ___________________ Project:_____ _________________________________ Marker:_______
Assessment criteria Fail < 50% Pass, 50 – 59% Credit, 60 – 69% Distinction, 70 – 79% High Distinction >80% Grade
(%)
WF
(%)
1 Introduction
Overview clearly presented
Key terms defined
Aim(s) of project clearly stated
Significance indicated
Overview missing
Definitions not provided
Aim(s) not stated
Significance of the project
not stated.
Overview inadequate
Some, but not all
definitions provided
Aim(s) stated, but require
more clarity
Significance unclear
Clear overview provided
All relevant definitions
provided
Aim(s) clearly stated.
Significance stated
Clear and
comprehensive
overview provided
All relevant
definitions provided.
Aims fully and
clearly stated
Significance clearly
stated
Clear and
comprehensive
overview provided
All relevant
definitions provided
Aims fully and clearly
stated.
Significance fully and
clearly stated
10
2 References to the
Literature/theoretical framework.
Literature fully up to date and
relevant to the project [No
significant literature omitted].
Appropriate balance achieved
between literature and the details
of the project.
Some references are used,
but relies on secondary
sources. Significant literature
omitted.
Insufficient/Overuse of
information from external
sources
Reference is made to the
relevant literature theory,
but no links are made with
the project AND/OR
Literature is not fully up to
date.
Some examples of
appropriate use of external
sources
Clear links are drawn
between the literature and
the significance of the
current project.
All relevant literature is
quoted appropriately
Literature is fully
up to date and is
fully and
appropriately linked
to the project
Reference to
external sources is
appropriate and
comprehensive
Covers all possible
aspects of the
literature
Aims of the current
project are critically
compared with
previous research
10
3 Methodology
Experimental procedure/modelling
approach/ data analysis
Fully appropriate to the aims of the
project
Sufficient detail provided here to be
able to replicate the project.
Incorrect details
Some basic concepts
misunderstood
Insufficient detail provided
Some incomplete
descriptions/inconsistent
information reported
Modelling/methodology
does not match the research
purpose/aims
Methodology is clearly and
accurately outlined.
Methodology/modelling
matches the research
purpose/aims
Methodology/mod
elling concisely
outlined with
attention to detail.
Description
provided in a
systematic way,
demonstrating a
sound ...
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerati.docxSUBHI7
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
15.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Ethical Considerations
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of n ...
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Consideratio.docxSUBHI7
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
15.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Ethical Considerations
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the cond ...
Signature AssignmentA ~5+ page single-spaced paper will incorpWilheminaRossi174
Signature Assignment
A ~5+ page single-spaced paper will incorporate global health issues and solutions through interventions to these issues. Choose any of the issues or diseases (or make your own up!) from the list below that are considered global public health problems. In the introduction, provide epidemiological information on the following: morbidity and mortality among the specific group, community, or country (not the USA). Discuss at least three interventions published in the scholarly literature to address the crisis in a country of your choice. Evaluate the progress and outcomes of such prevention programs. Describe the intervention (e.g. target audience, experimental/control group, intervention methods and materials, intervention outcomes) and assess the methods used in the intervention (e.g. level of the intervention, strengths and weaknesses of the intervention, potential impact/generalizability of the intervention).
· TB
· Malaria
· HIV/AIDS
· Access to water
· Water quality
· Air pollution
· Ebola
· Sanitation
· Cholera
· Climate change
· Healthcare
Total(40 points)
· PAGE ONE: Title page will have title, name, and NU affiliation. (1point)
· PAGE TWO: Abstract will provide an overview of what you determined within your paper. (4 points)
· PAGE THREE AND FOUR (OR MORE): Introduction to the topic of choice (one paragraph). (5 points)
· Methods and Discussion section including the methods you used for your literature view and all applicable intervention information. (10 points)
· Conclusion- summary of overall research, quality, and potential recommendations you would (or would not) make regarding this global health issue. (5 points)
· PAGE FIVE: Reference page (include at least 7 references primarily from peer-reviewed journals); exclusive of 3-5 page paper requirement. (10 points)
· APA formatting, grammar, structure, effort, overall professionalism of paper. (5 points)
Intervention example description:
The first intervention that I will discuss addressing Ebola outbreaks was conducted by Doctors without Borders in 1995 (Kerstein & Matthys, 1999). The intervention took place in Kikwit, Congo, which has approximately 200,000 inhabitants and two hospitals (Kikwit General Hospital and Kikwit II Hospital). The intervention actually occurred within the hospital setting, in an isolation ward. It was compared to a separate hospital in order to determine the intervention significance. The intervention included building an isolation ward specifically for Ebola patients with the use of trained CDC physicians to educate the local staff on and Ebola, cleaning, body burial, disinfection and antiseptic techniques, adequate water supply, a waste-disposal system, and usage of proper PPE (Kerstein & Matthys, 1999). Overall, the intervention was successful, though there were various strengths and weaknesses associated with it. The strengths were that it was a novel approach focusing on Ebola outbreaks and quarantine situations and ult ...
Similar to Research project step #4 Final PaperHide Assignment Informati.docx (20)
You will present information on the AAC Tobii Dynavox I Seri.docxlillie234567
You will present information on the AAC Tobii Dynavox I
Series device and SNAP Core First Software.
The following objectives should be met:
1. Identify the AAC Device and communication APP
2. Discuss/demonstrate its function, use specs, and the
population it is best suited for
3. Identify research, evidence of efficacy, list pros and
cons of the device/app
4. Use 3D visuals and video of demonstrating how it is
used
5. Steps the individual that it is best suited for needs to
take for improvement.
6. Roles of the speech pathologist and who they would
collaborate with.
7. Resources
8. At least 8-10 slides with slide transcript
.
TE
CH
46
0
M
od
ul
e
6
Im
p
le
m
e
n
ta
ti
o
n
P
la
n
Ru
br
ic
Cr
ite
ria
To
ta
l
In
cl
u
d
e
p
ro
b
le
m
s
ta
te
m
e
n
t
sl
id
e
f
ro
m
p
re
vi
o
u
s
d
e
li
ve
ra
b
le
1
0
In
cl
u
d
e
r
e
co
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
s
o
lu
ti
o
n
s
li
d
e
f
ro
m
p
re
vi
o
u
s
d
e
li
ve
ra
b
le
1
0
W
o
rk
B
re
a
kd
o
w
n
S
tr
u
ct
u
re
2
0
S
ch
e
d
u
le
2
0
S
o
lu
ti
o
n
v
a
li
d
a
ti
o
n
3
0
S
o
lu
ti
o
n
e
va
lu
a
ti
o
n
a
n
d
c
o
n
ti
n
u
o
u
s
im
p
ro
ve
m
e
n
t
3
0
Le
ga
l,
e
th
ic
a
l a
n
d
c
u
lt
u
ra
l c
o
n
si
d
e
ra
ti
o
n
s
3
0
To
ta
l
1
5
0
Pr
ob
le
m
S
ta
te
m
en
t
•S
up
po
rt
F
itb
it’
s a
dd
iti
on
o
f a
b
lo
od
p
re
ss
ur
e
m
on
ito
rin
g
ca
pa
bi
lit
y
th
ro
u
g
h
d
e
si
g
n
o
f
a
w
e
b
a
n
d
m
o
b
ile
a
p
p
u
se
r
in
te
rf
a
ce
w
it
h
t
h
e
fo
llo
w
in
g
f
e
a
tu
re
s:
•
D
is
p
la
y
b
lo
o
d
p
re
ss
u
re
r
e
a
d
in
g
s
n
u
m
e
ri
ca
ll
y
a
n
d
g
ra
p
h
ic
a
ll
y
•
Tr
a
ck
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
o
ve
r
ti
m
e
•
Id
e
n
ti
fy
lo
w
/h
ig
h
r
e
a
d
in
g
s
a
n
d
t
re
n
d
s
th
a
t
m
a
y
in
d
ic
a
te
h
e
a
lt
h
c
o
n
ce
rn
s
Re
co
m
m
en
de
d
So
lu
tio
n
•W
e
b
si
te
p
lu
s
p
la
tf
o
rm
-s
p
e
ci
fi
c
e
xt
e
n
si
o
n
s
to
e
xi
st
in
g
a
p
p
s
•J
u
st
if
ic
a
ti
o
n
•
In
te
g
ra
ti
o
n
w
it
h
e
xi
st
in
g
F
it
b
it
a
p
p
s
is
t
o
p
p
ri
o
ri
ty
•
U
se
rs
w
il
l n
o
t
w
a
n
t
to
d
o
w
n
lo
a
d
a
s
e
p
a
ra
te
a
p
p
j
u
st
f
o
r
B
P
m
o
n
it
o
ri
n
g
•
U
se
rs
w
il
l w
a
n
t
to
v
ie
w
B
P
d
a
ta
in
c
o
n
te
xt
w
it
h
o
th
e
r
h
e
a
lt
h
a
n
d
f
it
n
e
ss
d
a
ta
•
V
a
lu
e
o
f
in
te
g
ra
ti
o
n
ju
st
if
ie
s
h
ig
h
e
r
d
e
ve
lo
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
m
a
in
te
n
a
n
ce
c
o
st
s
W
or
k
Br
ea
kd
ow
n
St
ru
ct
ur
e
•
A
n
a
ly
si
s
•
D
ra
ft
r
e
q
u
ir
e
m
e
n
ts
s
p
e
ci
fi
ca
ti
o
n
•
R
e
vi
e
w
a
n
d
a
p
p
ro
ve
r
e
q
u
ir
e
m
e
n
ts
•
C
ro
ss
-p
la
tf
o
rm
d
e
si
g
n
•
C
o
m
p
le
te
c
o
m
m
o
n
U
X
d
e
si
g
n
•
D
e
si
g
n
c
li
e
n
t-
si
d
e
s
o
ft
w
a
re
•
W
e
b
a
p
p
d
e
ve
lo
p
m
e
n
t
•
A
d
a
p
t
co
m
m
o
n
U
X
d
e
si
g
n
f
o
r
w
e
b
•
C
o
d
e
H
T
M
L/
C
S
S
fo
r
w
e
b
a
p
p
•
C
o
d
e
J
a
va
S
cr
ip
t
fo
r
w
e
b
a
p
p
•
In
te
g
ra
te
w
it
h
c
lo
u
d
A
P
I
•
In
te
g
ra
te
w
it
h
e
xi
st
in
g
w
e
b
si
te
•
Te
st
w
e
b
a
p
p
•
iO
S
a
p
p
d
e
ve
lo
p
m
e
n
t
•
A
d
a
p
t
co
m
m
o
n
U
X
d
e
si
g
n
f
o
r
iO
S
•
C
o
d
e
iO
S
a
p
p
•
In
te
g
ra
te
w
it
h
w
e
a
ra
b
le
d
e
vi
ce
A
P
I
•
In
te
g
ra
te
w
it
h
c
lo
u
d
A
P
I
•
In
te.
Task· This is an individual task. · The task focuses on areas .docxlillie234567
Task
· This is an individual task.
· The task focuses on areas studied to date, requiring you to show knowledge and application in the parts stated.
· You should upload a single, correctly formatted document which may also include any relevant tables and diagrams
Continuing with the marketing plan you developed for the Midterm Assessment, complete it with according with the topics discussed in class during the 2nd part of the course with following points (but not exclusively)
1. Distribution Channels:
· Markets with direct sales (if any)
· Markets with distributors (if any)
· Markets with agents (if any)
2. Pricing Strategy:
· Pricing strategies per channel
· Take a product and show how should you fix the price according the channel
3. Communication Strategy
· Business Magazines
· Trade Shows
· Digital Tools
4. Any other factor you consider key for your marketing plan
Formalities:
· Wordcount: 2.000 words
· Cover, Table of Contents, References and Appendix are excluded from the total wordcount.
· Font: Arial 12,5 pts.
· Text alignment: Justified.
· Harvard style in-text citations and bibliography
It assesses the following learning outcomes:
1. Have an in-depth understanding of B2B market opportunities.
2. Identify and differentiate between the different and unique challenges of business markets
3. Apply and analyze the different B2Bsystems and processes
4. Have a systematic understanding of how theoretical concepts can be applied in business markets.
5. Critically appreciate B2B marketing strategy assessments and developments.
6. Apply and assess the tools for B2Bmarketing strategy development and implementation
Rubrics
Learning Descriptors
Fail Below 60%
Marginal Fail 60-69%
Fair 70-79 %
Good 80-89%
Exceptional 90-100%
Purpose & Understanding
KNOWLEDGE & UNDERSTANDING
15%
Very poor coverage of central purpose, goals, research questions or arguments with little relevant information evident. Virtually no evidence of understanding or focus.
Minimal understanding of purpose of the study; factual errors evident. Gaps in knowledge and superficial understanding. A few lines of relevant material.
Reasonable understanding and clearly identifies the purpose, goals, research questions or argument.
Reflect partial achievement of learning outcomes.
A sound grasp of, and clearly identifies, the purpose, goals, research questions or argument. Some wider study beyond the classroom content shown.
Effectively describes and explains the central purpose, arguments, research questions, or goals of the project; explanation is focused, detailed and compelling. Recognition of alternative forms of evidence beyond that supplied in the classroom.
Content
KNOWLEDGE & UNDERSTANDING
15%
Content is unclear, inaccurate and/or incomplete. Brief and irrelevant. Descriptive. Only personal views offered.
Unsubstantiated and does not support the purpose, argument or goals of the project. Reader gains no insight through the content of the project.
Limi.
Team ProjectMBA687What it is…The team project in MBA68.docxlillie234567
Team Project
MBA687
What it is…
The team project in MBA687 gives you, the learner and person who is one course away from an MBA:
The opportunity to demonstrate that you can work as a member of a high-functioning team to complete a complex analysis, synthesis and presentation task.
The opportunity to demonstrate mastery of the knowledge and skills that you have acquired through the MBA program.
Where to find information in the syllabus, 1
Page 6
Group Case Study
Prior to the start of Unit 7, students will be assigned into groups of no more than 4 students per group. Each group will be assigned to complete a case study chosen by the instructor from 20 cases located in Appendix C. The 20 case materials can be found in the required textbook (see Appendix C for relevant page numbers). Group case studies should follow the same requirements as the writing assignments stated above. Group case studies are due in Unit 7. Earlier submissions are encouraged.
Also from Page 6
Writing Assignments
Writing assignments must be APA compliant and include a title page, appropriate citations, and references.
Where to find information in the syllabus, 2
Appendix C (Page 24)
This was the list from which your team selected its case
Pages 43-45
This is the rubric (grading guide) that the instructor will use to evaluate and grade the team’s submission.
General outline for the submission
This submission is much like one that you would present in a workplace situation. Imagine that you are presenting your findings on the case to senior management of your company, or to the board of directors.
For your paper, use the outline found in Table 2, page C-6 of your text.
Strategic Profile and Case Analysis Purpose
Situation Analysis
A. General environmental analysis
B. Industry analysis
C. Competitor analysis
D. Internal analysis
III. Identification of Environmental Opportunities and Threats and Firm Strengths and Weaknesses (SWOT Analysis)
Strategy Formulation
A. Strategic alternatives
B. Alternative evaluation
C. Alternative choice
Strategic Alternative Implementation
A. Action items
B. Action plan
Parts I, II and II
Parts I, II and III are much like the introduction, external analysis and internal analysis that you did for your individual project.
The author provides a list of things that you can consider about the external analysis of the industry in Table 3 (C-7)
The author discusses industry analysis (C-6), competitor analysis (C-7) and industry analysis (C-8). It will be helpful to review these areas, even though you have done your individual projects.
In the following pages, the author suggests many tools that you can use to analyze the company and its industry.
Strategy in the paper, 1
Strategy formulation
This is your team’s recommendations for the company
Recommendations should be either business level strategy alternatives or corporate level strategy alternatives.
Recommendations should be based on and sup.
T he fifteen year-old patient was scheduled for surgery on t.docxlillie234567
T he fifteen year-old patient was
scheduled for surgery on the right
side of his brain to remove a right tem-
poral lobe lesion that was believed to be
causing his epileptic seizures.
The surgery began with the sur-
geon making an incision on the left
side, opening the skull, penetrating the
dura and removing significant portions
of the left amygdala, hippocampus and
other left-side brain tissue before it was
discovered that they were working on
the wrong side.
The left-side wound was closed,
the right side was opened and the pro-
cedure went ahead on the right, correct
side.
The error in the O.R. was revealed
to the parents shortly after the surgery,
but only as if it was a minor and incon-
sequential gaffe.
The patient recuperated, left the
hospital, returned to his regular activi-
ties and graduated from high school
before his parents could no longer deny
he was not all right. After a thorough
neurological assessment he had to be
placed in an assisted living facility for
brain damaged individuals.
When the full magnitude of the
consequences came to light a lawsuit
was filed which resulted in a $11 mil-
lion judgment which was affirmed by
the Supreme Court of Arkansas.
A circulating nurse has a le-
gal duty to see that surgery
does not take place on the
wrong side of the body.
The preoperative documents
failed to identify on which side
the surgery was to be done.
It was below the standard of
care for the circulating nurse
not to notice that fact and not
to seek out the correct infor-
mation.
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
December 13, 2012
Operating Room: Surgical Error Blamed, In
Part, On Circulating Nurse’s Negligence.
Surgical Error Blamed, In Part, On
Circulating Nurse’s Negligence
The Court accepted the testimony
of the family’s nursing expert that a
circulating nurse has a fundamental
responsibility as a member of the surgi-
cal team to make sure that surgery is
done on the correct anatomical site,
especially when it is brain surgery.
The circulating nurse is supposed
to understand imposing terms like se-
lective amygdala hippocampectomy
and know the basics of how it is sup-
posed to be done.
Hospital policy called for the sur-
geon, the anesthesiologist, the circulat-
ing nurse and the scrub nurse or tech to
take a “timeout” prior to starting a sur-
gical case for final verification of the
correct anatomical site.
The circulating nurse should have
available three essential documents, the
surgical consent form, the preoperative
history and the O.R. schedule.
The full extent of the error, that is,
a full list of the parts of the brain that
were removed from the healthy side,
should have been documented by the
circulating nurse, and failure to do so
was a factor that adversely affected the
patient’s later medical course, the pa-
tient’s nursing expert said. Proassur-
ance v. Metheny, __ S.W. 3d __, 2012 WL
6204231 (Ark.
Study Participants Answers to Interview QuestionsParticipant #1.docxlillie234567
Study Participants Answers to Interview Questions
Participant #1:
1. What are the disparities between jail and youth rehabilitation for African American offenders?
a. African Americans will be imprisoned more than their white counterparts who will be given rehabilitation, institutional racism exists, and the system will spend more man hours and time dealing with white offenders than black offenders.
2. What are some social issues that African American juveniles are faced with?
a. Sociocultural stigmas, single-parent households, inadequate educational systems, poor role models, and single-parent households
3. Why are African American male juveniles not offered other means of rehabilitative punishments?
a. The New Jim Crow is our correctional system, which seeks to fill jail cells by incarcerating more black and Latino people who are then utilized as enslaved people in the system for huge corporations and the US Government. The system indicates they are not receptive and will not change.
4. What effects does the existing jail and punishment system have on this population?
a. Demeaning and discouraging—we should fund educational aid, mental health services, and instruction. Providing people with helpful tools, role models, and direction will also help them become contributing members of society
Participant #2:
1. Youth rehabilitation centers should provide mechanisms to prevent offenders from committing crimes but in order to effectively do that the differences amongst AA juveniles and other races must be addressed, while jail just allows for a separation from society to think about the crime.
2. African American male juveniles are faced with a predetermined
perception of being criminals as well as a lack of resources in their communities to educate them on the different career paths & trades that exist.
3. The funding doesn’t exist to provide other rehabilitative opportunities in AA communities.
4. The existing punishment system allows offenders to be separated from the public but it doesn’t provide them with any resources to be successful once their time is complete. Not addressing the underlying issues of how they entered the system as well as how to they can live a successful life after now being labeled as a criminal normally results in repeat offenders.
Participant #3:
1. The youth aren’t getting the proper guidance, mental healthcare and attentiveness in jail. They’re already “written off” which leads to them believing what they’re being taught and increasing the likelihood of them becoming repeat offenders. In youth rehab, you’re given a second chance, you’re being taught how to manage your mental and emotional state. You are being prepared for the world.
2. Prejudice. Are seen as thugs, no good. Etc. don’t have proper resources to get them back on their feet. Difficulty getting jobs, getting into school once released.
3. Unsure, but I’m sure it’s race.
4. You can become in.
STUDENT REPLIES
STUDENT REPLY #1 Vanessa Deleon Guerrero
When conducting surveillance, you are closely monitoring a person’s activities. Investigators or detectives watch their every move, at home, work, where they eat, shop all while being unnoticeable. When detectives conduct surveillance, they still need to ensure that they are respecting the person’s privacy. For example, detectives will not take photos of the person while they are in the shower. If the person is outside or in an area that has public view, then they can take photos of that person. They must conduct their surveillance in an orderly manner, without causing panic to the public in order to ensure public safety.
Private companies such as Facebook, Instagram or twitter are used for people to express themselves. However, what is posted on their social media becomes public and they make their lives public for everyone to see. If someone posted that they were just at a park where a shooting happened, law enforcement can use that to interview them because it puts them at the scene of the crime. However, private companies, for example like phone companies should not use data like text messaging for their benefit. They should not be allowed to read their customers’ messages or listen in on their phone calls. That is a true invasion of privacy.
Reference
Brandl, S. (2018). Criminal investigation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Bedi, M. (2016). The curious case of cell phone location data: Fourth Amendment doctrine mash-up Links to an external site... Northwestern University Law Review, 110(2), 507–524
STUDENT REPLY #2 Danielle Berlus
Hello everyone, when I think of surveillance, I think of all the places that they put cameras like the ones at streetlights that catch you speeding or when they are looking for a suspect and they look to facial recognition devices. I think it is hard to balance what is expected to be private. I don't think anything is private anymore except possibly the bathrooms and even then, someone maybe recording you. Our cell phones I think are being monitored by so many companies and even those who want to steal our personal data as well.
"The government tracks movements through the acquisition of cell phone location data: historical cell phone location data, real-time cell phone location data, and actively "pinging" a cell phone for location data. Cell phone providers store location data as the normal part of their business of providing service. Police, in turn, can request that cell phone providers hand over this location data for a suspect over a set period of time. This information is classified as historical cell phone location data. This data stands in contrast to real-time location data. Whereas the former focuses on past locations, real-time data provides locations as they actually occur. Here, cell phone providers, upon request, give police contemporaneous data on the location of the nearest cell tower for tracking p.
Student Name
BUS 300 Public Relations
[Insert Instructor’s Name]
Month Date Year
BUS300 PR Plan Part 2 Outline
This paper will be a revised and expanded version of Developing a Public Relations Plan, Part 1 assignment in Week 4. Your paper should have a section with the bolded headers below. Ensure you have a section that discusses each of these:
Mix Media
In this section, you will describe the mix of media you would use to implement your public relations campaign and explain in detail your objectives for each media form. Include traditional and twenty-first- century integrated marketing communication strategies in your discussion. (This section should be at least three paragraphs).
Government Relations
In this section you will describe the government relations tactics you would use as part of your public relations campaign, and explain in detail how these tactics will help you achieve your objectives. In great detail explain how these tactics will help you achieve your objectives. (This section should be at least two paragraphs).
Community Relations
In this section please explain in detail how you can take advantage of community relations to generate positive publicity for your organization. (This section should be at least two paragraphs).
News Release
Draft a news release that you will use in your public relations campaign (Chapter 15). Explain in detail how the content, style, and essentials of your news release will help you persuade the public to your point of view. Use information from Chapter 15 as support. Describe the key elements of writing to consider when responding to a public relations crisis or scandal. (Your news release should be similar to the example provided in the book).
Crisis Management
In this section you will explain the five planning issues related to crisis management that can be employed to mitigate the scandal or risks (Chapter 17). (This section should be at least four to five paragraphs).
Additional Requirements
Remember to Include in-text citations when presenting information from other sources. You should begin your search for sources in the Strayer Library. Use a minimum of three credible, relevant, and appropriate sources. After you conclude the paper, you will need a separate page that includes your references. Include a sources page at the end of your paper.
Please ensure you proofread your paper and summarize when providing in-text citations.
1. Enter your first source entry here.
2. Enter your second source entry here.
3. Enter your third source entry here.
image1.png
BUS 300 Public Relations
Dr. Tenielle Buchanan
October 30, 2022BUS300 PR Plan Part 1 Outline
Your paper should have a section with the bolded headers below. Ensure you have a section that discusses each of these:
Name of organization
The United States-based publication Rolling Stone magazine is a news magazine that covers articles on current events relating to music, contempo.
Statistical Process Control 1 STATISTICAL PROCESS .docxlillie234567
Statistical Process Control 1
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL
by XXXXXXXX
Student ID: 2XXXXXXX
University of Northampton
(Amity Global Institute Pte Ltd, Singapore)
Managing Operations and The Supply Chain
Dr. Melvin Goh
BSOM046
BSOM046-SUM-1920-ES1-Statistical Process Control
18 Oct XXXX
Word Count: 1600 (± 50)
Statistical Process Control 2
Table of Content
1. Introduction………………………………………………………………….3
2. Literature Review……………………………………………………………3
3. Methodology…………………………………………………………………5
4. Case Study Analysis…………………………………………………………9
5. Recommendation…………………………………………………………….15
6. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………...17
7. References……………………………………………………………………18
8. Appendix……………………………………………………………………..22
Statistical Process Control 3
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL
INTRODUCTION
This report will provide a literature review of the concept and relevance of statistical process
control (SPC) from its inception until the present day. A case study of Waterside’s Leather
Limited (WLL) using the temperature data of its combined effluent discharge over one hundred
and twenty days will be conducted, and a recommendation will also be proposed.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Man has always tried to imitate and better his competitors to develop a better and cheaper
product or service. This idea was as crucial for the hunter-gatherer as it is for the manufacturing
industry after many millennia. This awareness led to the requirement of apprentices having to
follow in the footsteps of the master craftsmen for many years until they could become masters
in their craft. However, this was not a scientifically tabulated and monitored process.
Bradford and Miranti (2019) state that “it was in 1924 that Walter A. Shewhart introduced the
use of control charts to evaluate data distribution patterns to determine whether manufacturing
processes remain under control at Bell Telephone Laboratories”. He also introduced the terms
of variation in the process which comprises of common cause and special cause variation
(Subhabrata and Marien, 2019).
SPC is a technique for controlling processes to distinguish causes of variation and signal for
corrective action (Chen 2005 cited in Avakh and Nasari 2016). While some say that “SPC is
the use of statistically based tools and techniques principally for the management and
Statistical Process Control 4
improvement of processes” (Stapenhurrst, 2005), others say that “SPC is not really about
statistics or control, it is about competitiveness” (Oakland and Oakland, 2018).
Figure 1: A typical Control Chart
(Graph from https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/nonparametric-statistical-process/9781118456033/c02.xhtml#head-2-
18)
The USA War Department used these methods to enhance the quality of products during World
War II. W.E Deming used Shewhart’s cycle in his quality training in Japan in 1950 but made
a new version stress.
Student 1 Student Mr. Randy Martin Eng 102 MW .docxlillie234567
Student 1
Student
Mr. Randy Martin
Eng 102 MW
6 December 2010
The Tragedy of Othello
The “Devil” throughout the ages has been referred to by many names; accuser, adversary,
enemy, and thief among others, no matter what title is given he is universally accepted as the
purest and ultimate form of evil. In William Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Othello,
Shakespeare uses the element of drama of character to create a villain that embodies absolute
wickedness, a human form of the author of evil. The character Shakespeare creates to serve as
the ultimate antagonist is none other than “honest Iago.” Iago’s character is the best
representation of an elusive villain whose clever abilities to deceive and persuade bring
catastrophic destruction like that of an unexpected, nearly invisible black ice. Shakespeare uses
the character to advance the theme that mankind has the ability to be influenced and even driven
to engage in repulsive and devastatingly horrendous acts towards to each other. Iago himself is
driven and influences the actions Casio, Othello, and Rodrigo.
Spurred by jealousy and the pain of an injured pride Iago observes the man who was
granted/appointed the position he believed to have deserved and conceives a plan for taking
Cassio(this man) out. The character Cassio is deceived and manipulated by Iago in two manners.
First Iago sets up Cassio to betray himself and be demoted and then later uses Cassio as a pawn
to play into an even greater and more elaborate act of revenge against Othello.
Giving into anger and jealousy, Iago devises a plan to crush Cassio and satiate the pain of
Student 2
being passed over, Shakespeare writes:
I: With as little
a web as this will I ensnare as great a fly as Cassio. Ay, smile upon her, do!
I will gyve thee in thine own courtship…
If such tricks as these strip you out of your lieutenantry, (2.1.162-4)
Critic August Schlegel notes, “…he spreads his nets with a skill which nothing can escape.” The
devastation of being passed over for the position drove Iago to exact revenge on the unknowing
bystander, Cassio. Pride is a powerful internal motivator that takes a tremendous toll on those
who allow it contribute to their actions or control their thoughts. It is easy to give into the
feelings of being wronged and turn an evil eye rather than applauding another in their success.
More commonly found in relationships is the mentality of if I can’t have him nobody will.
With ease and grace Iago is able to show Cassio false sympathy and gain trust that allows
him to direct Cassio’s actions, by creating false hope. Shakespeare writes:
I: …, I could heartily wish this had not
befall’n; but since it is as it is, mend it for your own good.(2.3.270-1)
I: I tell you what you
shall do. Our general’s wife is now the general...
confess yourself freely to her; importune her help
to put you in your place again. She is of so free, .
Sophia Pathways for College Credit – English Composition II
SAMPLE TOUCHSTONE AND SCORING
Logan Stevens
English Composition II
December 20, 2019
Where’s the Beef?: Ethics and the Beef Industry
Americans love their beef. Despite the high rate of its consumption, in recent years
people in the United States have grown increasingly concerned about where their food comes
from, how it is produced, and what environmental and health impacts result from its production.
These concerns can be distilled into two ethical questions: is the treatment of cattle humane and
is there a negative environmental impact of beef production? For many, the current methods of
industrial beef production and consumption do not meet personal ethical or environmental
standards. Therefore, for ethical and environmental reasons, people should limit their beef
consumption.
The first ethical question to consider is the humane treatment of domesticated cattle. It
has been demonstrated in multiple scientific studies that animals feel physical pain as well as
emotional states such as fear (Grandin & Smith, 2004, para. 2). In Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operations (CAFOs), better known as “factory farms” due to their industrialized attitude toward
cattle production, cattle are often confined to unnaturally small areas; fed a fattening, grain-based
diet; and given a constant stream of antibiotics to help combat disease and infection. In his essay,
“An Animal’s Place,” Michael Pollan (2002) states that beef cattle often live “standing ankle
Comment [SL1]: Hi Logan! This is a great title.
Comment [SL2]: It will help strengthen your opening
sentence to include some sort of facts or statistics about
beef consumption in America.
Comment [SL3]: Throughout your essay, you talk about
more than just limiting the consumption of beef. How could
you strengthen your Thesis Statement to connect all of
those points?
Sophia Pathways for College Credit – English Composition II
SAMPLE TOUCHSTONE AND SCORING
deep in their own waste eating a diet that makes them sick” (para. 40). Pollan describes
Americans’ discomfort with this aspect of meat production and notes that they are removed from
and uncomfortable with the physical and psychological aspects of killing animals for food. He
simplifies the actions chosen by many Americans: “we either look away—or stop eating
animals” (para. 32). This decision to look away has enabled companies to treat and slaughter
their animals in ways that cause true suffering for the animals. If Americans want to continue to
eat beef, alternative, ethical methods of cattle production must be considered.
The emphasis on a grain-based diet, and therefore a reliance on mono-cropping, also
contributes to the inefficient use of available land. The vast majority of grain production (75-
90% depending on whether corn or soy) goes to feeding animals rather than humans, and cattle
alone .
STORY TELLING IN MARKETING AND SALES – AssignmentThe Ethic.docxlillie234567
STORY TELLING IN MARKETING AND SALES – Assignment
The Ethics of Storytelling
Assignment Description:
During the past week in class, we learned that all brand stories need to have a strong ethical foundation. Brands need to create and distribute messages that are honest and convey their corporate values.
FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, “CHOOSE ANY 1” OF THE FOLLOWING SHORT VIDEOS TO WRITE ABOUT:
· “Apple 2013 Christmas commercial”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03KQTCEM08k
· “WestJet Christmas Miracle”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIEIvi2MuEk&t=9s
For the video you choose, answer the following questions about the story that is being told:
(minimum 350 words, combine 1 to 5)
1. Does this story affirm the company’s core values? Why or why not?
2. Does this story foster trust with each and every stakeholder? Why or why not?
3. Does this story help build relationships? Why or why not?
4. Does this story showcase diverse and inclusive behaviors?
5. Does this story honor the company’s commitments and promises to its customers? Why or why not?
Note: Write a minimum of 350 words for above 5 questions, conveying your own thoughts and views.
image1.png
CHCCCS023 Learner Guide Version 1.1 Page 1 of 59
CHCCCS023
Support independence and
wellbeing
Learner Guide
CHCCCS023 Learner Guide Version 1.1 Page 2 of 59
Table of Contents
Unit of Competency ..................................................................................................................... 5
Application ...................................................................................................................................... 5
Unit Sector ...................................................................................................................................... 5
Performance Criteria ....................................................................................................................... 6
Foundation Skills ............................................................................................................................. 8
Assessment Requirements .............................................................................................................. 9
1. Recognise and support individual differences.......................................................................... 12
1.1 – Recognise and respect the person’s social, cultural and spiritual differences ........................ 13
Individual differences .................................................................................................................... 13
Social differences .......................................................................................................................... 13
Cultural differences ....................................................
STEP IV CASE STUDY & FINAL PAPERA. Based on the analysis in Ste.docxlillie234567
STEP IV: CASE STUDY & FINAL PAPER
A. Based on the analysis in Step III, choose which theory best applies to this situation. Add any arguments justifying your choice of these ethical principles to support your decision.
Consequentialism (Utilitarian) Theory
Deontology Theory
Kant’s Categorical Imperative Principle
Social Contract Theory
Virtue Ethics Theory
NAME THE THEORY HERE: Deontology Theory
B. Explain your choice above: THIS AREA SHOULD BE 4-7 sentences or roughly 100-200 words.
Deontology is an approach to Ethics that focuses on the rightness or wrongness of actions themselves I choose this because ethical actions based on normative theories can be effective in developing better privacy practices for organizations. A business should be able to admit to making a mistake. This is especially important to shareholders, employees, and other stakeholders.It is important for businesses to operate with transparency. Consumers need to be able to trust what businesses present to them.
C. Your decision: What would you do? Why? List the specific steps needed to implement your defensible ethical decision. THIS AREA SHOULD BE 2 OR MORE PARAGRAPHS (250-350 words).
Deontology is a theory of ethics that suggests that actions can either be bad or good when judged based on a clear set of rules. So what I would do is set these rules in place. Businesses/companies should uphold the ethical standard of respect. People personal data shouldn’t be treated as ends rather than means. Companies should keep personal data about their customers/users and should be expected to keep this information private out of respect for these individual’s privacy.
Another rule, Businesses/companies should uphold complete transparency. This builds not only trust, but help builds a relationship with the users/customers. And if they don’t enclosed information the company’s actions would be considered unethical and wrong. Another rule is that there should always be accountability. A business/company should always be able to admit to making a mistake. This is especially important to shareholders, and stakeholders. They should be able to own up to missteps even when this could have serious consequences. With these rules emplaced it would be more ethical.
D. What longer-term changes (i.e., political, legal, societal, organizational) would help prevent your defined dilemma in the future? THIS AREA SHOULD BE 2 OR MORE PARAGRAPHS (250-350 words).
My dilemma is the misuse of personal information and data. Not just in social media but, also companies and business. One of the obvious ways to stop this dilemma is to make it that companies aren’t allowed to collect and store our personal data. User data can legally be sold as long as legal conditions for its collection and sale have been met and there isn’t any regulation against it. Our data is being sold for profit. This shouldn’t be allowed. There should be laws and regulations against that. They are the only ones benefiting.
Step 1Familiarize yourself with the video found here .docxlillie234567
Step 1:
Familiarize yourself with the video found here:
Link to Who Leads Us? video
AND the website associated with the video, located here:
Who Leads Us?
AND the website of your Representative in the United States House:
The US House of Representatives
Step 2:
After learning about Reflective Democracy across the United States it is time to learn about how it affects you. Begin by examining yourself and your surrounding community. How would you describe your cultural background? How would you describe the cultural background of your US Representative? How would you describe the cultural background of the district that he or she represents (and that you are a part of)? Compare and contrast the culture of the district to the culture of your Representative. Compare and contrast the culture of your Representative and your culture. Compare and contrast your culture with the culture of the district that you live. Where do you see the greatest differences between cultures? What are some advantages and disadvantages of these cultural differences? How would you work to bridge the divide between cultures? (SR 1)Step 3:
Find a policy issue that your Representative has taken a stand on. Explain that issue in detail. Once you have explained the issue, provide information on where your representative stands on the issue. Where do you stand on the issue? What do you believe should be done? What might be another alternative solution? Thinking about your ideas on the issue who might object to your viewpoint and what might their objections be? Once you’ve laid out their objections, respond to them, and explain, with logic, why your perspective is correct and your opponents’ objections are mistaken. (PR 1 and PR 2)Step 4:
Now that you have officially staked out a policy position, you need to think about how to get it put into action. Who in the government, and who in your community. do you believe should be involved? What specific actions should you (and those in the community) take? Why is it important to get your community involved and what will be the benefits of activating people to the cause? (SR 2)Step 5:
Let’s assume that you are successful in your efforts, and you achieve your policy goal. What do you believe will be the consequences of putting this policy into practice? How far reaching do you think the consequences will be for your community? Your state? Your country? What do you think will be the effects over the short term? Over the long term? Be sure to mention both positive and negative consequences that might result? (PR 3)
.
Statistical application and the interpretation of data is importan.docxlillie234567
Statistical application and the interpretation of data is important in health care. Review the statistical concepts covered in this topic. In a 800-1,000 words paper, discuss the significance of statistical application in health care. Include the following:
1. Describe the application of statistics in health care. Specifically discuss its significance to quality, safety, health promotion, and leadership.
2. Consider your organization or specialty area and how you utilize statistical knowledge. Discuss how you obtain statistical data, how statistical knowledge is used in day-to-day operations and how you apply it or use it in decision making.
Three peer-reviewed, scholarly or professional references are required.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
RUBRICS:
1, Application of statistics in health care is described in detail. The significance to quality, safety, health promotion, and leadership is described thoroughly for all criteria. Strong information and rationale is provided to fully illustrate the application of statistics, and its significance, to health care and the specific areas.
2, Application of statistical knowledge to organization or specialty area is thoroughly discussed. How statistical data are obtained, used in day-to-day operations, or applied in decision making is described in detail. The ability to understand and apply statistical data is clearly demonstrated.
3, Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4, Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5, Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English
6, Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Compañías utilizando la Inteligencia Artificial
La Inteligencia Artificial es un campo donde se combina las ciencias de las computadoras y bases de datos para ayudar a resolver problemas o para simular Inteligencia Humana. Comprende varios subcampos donde se utilizan varios métodos en los cuales se pueden mencionar los más comunes que son: las maquinas aprendiendo o Machine Learning y el aprendizaje profundo o Deep Learning. Estos métodos o disciplinas están comprometidas con los Algoritmos de la Inteligencia Artificial que buscan crear sistemas expertos que pueden hacer predicciones o clasificaciones basadas en una data introducida por un usuario. Algunas de las funciones primarias de la Inteligencia Artificial varían entre razonar, aprender, resolver problemas, toma de decisiones y principalmente entender el comportamiento humano. Este concepto esta formado por dos tipos de acercamientos, el primero es el acercamiento humano y el acercamiento ideal. Cuando hablamos del acercamiento humano, estamos emprendiendo sistemas que piensan y actúan como humanos. El acercami.
SOURCE: http://eyeonhousing.org/2013/09/24/property-tax-remains-largest-revenue-source/
Property tax comes from housing. More new construction means more property taxes collected. The
better (so more expensive the home) the more property taxes collected. Defaults, foreclosures can
drive down house values and reduce property taxes. You are simply trying to understand some
forecasting regarding the future (maybe near-term future) of property taxes to be collected. CERNIK
Property Tax Remains Largest Revenue Source
According to the latest data from the Census Bureau, taxes paid by homeowners and other real
estate owners remain the largest single source of revenue for state and local governments. At
34%, property taxes represent a significantly larger share than the next largest sources: individual
income taxes (24%) and sales taxes (21%).
State and local government property tax collections continue to increase on a nominal basis.
From the third quarter of 2012 through the end of the second quarter of 2013, approximately
$479 billion in taxes were paid by property owners. This was a small increase from the
previous trailing four-quarter record of $477 billion, set last quarter.
The modest changes throughout the Great Recession in nominal state and local government
property tax collections are due in large part to lagging property assessments and the ability of
local jurisdiction to make annual adjustments to tax rates. In general, declining property values
are not reflected in the system until a few years after the decline occurs. Once assessments are
updated, property tax authorities can adjust rates thus maintaining a desired level of collection.
http://eyeonhousing.org/2013/09/24/property-tax-remains-largest-revenue-source/
http://www.census.gov/govs/qtax/
http://eyeonhousing.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/piechart.png
As state and local government property tax collections increased in recent years, the share of
local tax collections due to property taxes fell from a high of 37.4% in the second quarter of
2010 to the current share of 33.5%. The average share for property taxes since 2000 is 32.4%.
The changing share of local collections is due predominantly to fluctuations in all other tax
receipts. State and local individual income tax, corporate income tax, and sales tax collections
are very responsive to changing economic conditions. For example, in the second quarter of 2009
state and local governments collected $76 billion in individual income tax. In the second quarter
of 2013, the most recent, state and local governments collected $114 billion in individual income
tax. The dramatic 50% increase in state and local individual income tax receipts is due to
improving economic conditions, rising incomes, and higher rates in several states.
http://eyeonhousing.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/chart_13.png
The S&P/Case-Shiller House Price Index – National Index grew by 7.1% on a n.
Sophia Pathways for College Credit – English Composition I
Are you ready to write Touchstone 4?
The essay below provides an example of an advanced level argumentative essay. As you read through
the essay, notice how the author effectively incorporates elements of argument, has a strong thesis
statement which takes a stand on one side of a debatable topic, and utilizes the classical model of
argumentation with effective incorporation and utilization of support.
______________________________________________________________________
Marcus Bishop
English Composition I
March 15, 2018
Teenage Sleep and School Start Times
John, an average teenager, tries to get to school on time in the mornings. He sets two
alarms on his phone and often skips a shower or breakfast, or both, so that he doesn’t miss the
school bus that stops at his corner at 7:00 AM. Once at school, John joins his sleep-deprived
peers in mad dashes to their first classes. School is on, whether students are prepared to learn
or not. According to numerous studies, the average U.S. teenager gets between 7 and 7.25
hours of sleep a night, while his body needs between 9 and 9.5 hours. With the average start
time for high school in the U.S. 8:03 AM (Croft, Ferro, and Wheaton, 2015), it’s not a great leap
to conclude many high school students are sleep-deprived. High schools should implement later
start times to maintain healthy biological functions and to maximize learning for teenagers.
Comment [SL1]: While the sentence structure is a bit
repetitive, this introduction does a good job of engaging the
reader with the average teenager and providing the
necessary background information for the reader to fully
understand the importance of the thesis.
Comment [SL2]: This is a well written thesis statement. It
takes a clear position on one side of a debatable topic. It is
concise, yet provides adequate detail so that the reader
knows what your key points within the essay will likely be.
Sophia Pathways for College Credit – English Composition I
Sleep deprivation in teens affects their health, including issues like mood and behavior,
increased anxiety or depression, use of caffeine, tobacco, or alcohol, and even weight gain. Lack
of sleep increases the likelihood that teens across all socio-economic spectrums will be unable
to concentrate and will suffer poor grades in school as a result. In addition, teens, already in a
high risk category as new drivers, are more susceptible to “drowsy-driving incidents.” (Richter,
2015). These are all compelling reasons to consider changes in school start times for teenagers.
Our internal body clocks – what scientists call circadian rhythm - regulate biological
processes according to light and dark. When our eyes tell us it’s dark, we begin to tire, and
when our eyes tell us it’s light, we begin to waken. Adults often refer to themselves as a
“morning person” or a “night person” because t.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Delivering Micro-Credentials in Technical and Vocational Education and TrainingAG2 Design
Explore how micro-credentials are transforming Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) with this comprehensive slide deck. Discover what micro-credentials are, their importance in TVET, the advantages they offer, and the insights from industry experts. Additionally, learn about the top software applications available for creating and managing micro-credentials. This presentation also includes valuable resources and a discussion on the future of these specialised certifications.
For more detailed information on delivering micro-credentials in TVET, visit this https://tvettrainer.com/delivering-micro-credentials-in-tvet/
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
MATATAG CURRICULUM: ASSESSING THE READINESS OF ELEM. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS I...NelTorrente
In this research, it concludes that while the readiness of teachers in Caloocan City to implement the MATATAG Curriculum is generally positive, targeted efforts in professional development, resource distribution, support networks, and comprehensive preparation can address the existing gaps and ensure successful curriculum implementation.
Research project step #4 Final PaperHide Assignment Informati.docx
1. Research project step #4: Final Paper
Hide Assignment Information
Instructions
Research project: Final paper, 150 points, 15% of final grade,
due week 8
Your final paper will be the culmination of your research over
the semester. It will be a minimum of 12 pages, plus a separate
cover page and separate page for your bibliography.
The main part, your narrative will include the thesis,
Introduction, the description/content of your research, and the
conclusion.
The Introduction section should clearly state the thesis within
the first 1-2 paragraphs. The thesis must be relevant and
appropriate to the argument and demonstrate an accurate and
complete understanding of the question(s).
The main part should incorporate pertinent details from
assigned coursework and reliable outside historical sources. If
in doubt about a sources, ask your instructor). The section must
provide relevant historical evidence to support the thesis and
the key claims made in the argument as needed. It should
maintain focus and avoid getting sidetracked. It should present
your answer(s) to the question(s) asked clearly and concisely in
an organized manner and it should be free of grammar &
spelling errors.
The conclusion section should be in the last part of your essay
exam within the last 1-2 paragraphs. It should briefly restate the
thesis and summarize the main points of the argument. It should
also demonstrate insight and understanding regarding the
2. question(s) asked and it should be free of grammar & spelling
errors.
Be sure to use spell check!
Here is the grading rubric for the final paper:
A scoring rubric for each essay exam is included below. The
exam question will be posted in the assignment folder.
Criteria
Mechanics – (5 criteria)
Minimum 12 double-spaced pages in length; pages are
numbered; 1 inch margins included; 12 point Arial, Calibri, or
Times New Roman font used; a cover page with identifying
information included
All 5 criteria are present with 0-1 error
4 of 5 criteria are present OR all 5 criteria are present with 2-3
errors
3 of 5 criteria are present OR 4 of 5 criteria are present with 2-3
errors OR all 5 criteria are present with 4-5 errors
3. 2 of 5 criteria are present OR 3 of 5 criteria are present with 2-3
errors OR 4 of 5 criteria are present with 4-5 errors OR all 5
criteria are present with 6-7 errors
0 or 1 of 5 criteria are present OR 2 of 5 criteria are present
with 2-3 errors OR 3 of 5 criteria are present with 4-5 errors OR
4 of 5 criteria are present with 6-7 errors OR all 5 criteria are
present with more than 7 errors
Citations – (5 criteria)
Footnotes/Endnotes & Works Cited/ Bibliography page
included; Chicago/Turabian style used; selected sources are
appropriate to the topic; citations support assertions made in the
essay; footnotes/endnotes used in each instance where detailed
explanations would distract from the argument
All 5 criteria are present with 0-1 error
4 of 5 criteria are present OR all 5 criteria are present with 2-3
errors
3 of 5 criteria are present OR 4 of 5 criteria are present with 2-3
errors OR all 5 criteria are present with 4-5 errors
2 of 5 criteria are present OR 3 of 5 criteria are present with 2-3
errors OR 4 of 5 criteria are present with 4-5 errors OR all 5
criteria are present with 6-7 errors
0 or 1 of 5 criteria are present OR 2 of 5 criteria are present
with 2-3 errors OR 3 of 5 criteria are present with 4-5 errors OR
4 of 5 criteria are present with 6-7 errors OR all 5 criteria are
present with more than 7 errors
Thesis/Introduction (5 criteria)
4. Clearly stated within the first 1-2 paragraphs; relevant &
appropriate to the argument; demonstrated an accurate &
complete understanding of the question(s); did more than restate
the question(s) & offer a brief response; free of grammar &
spelling errors
All 5 criteria are present with 0-1 error
4 of 5 criteria are present OR all 5 criteria are present with 2-3
errors
3 of 5 criteria are present OR 4 of 5 criteria are present with 2-3
errors OR all 5 criteria are present with 4-5 errors
2 of 5 criteria are present OR 3 of 5 criteria are present with 2-3
errors OR 4 of 5 criteria are present with 4-5 errors OR all 5
criteria are present with 6-7 errors
0 or 1 of 5 criteria are present OR 2 of 5 criteria are present
with 2-3 errors OR 3 of 5 criteria are present with 4-5 errors OR
4 of 5 criteria are present with 6-7 errors OR all 5 criteria are
present with more than 7 errors
Argument – (5 criteria)
Incorporated pertinent details from assigned coursework &
outside readings when permitted; provided relevant historical
evidence to support the thesis & key claims in the argument as
needed; maintained focus & avoided being sidetracked;
presented answer clearly & concisely in an organized manner;
free of grammar & spelling errors
All 5 criteria are present with 0-1 error
4 of 5 criteria are present OR all 5 criteria are present with 2-3
5. errors
3 of 5 criteria are present OR 4 of 5 criteria are present with 2-3
errors OR all 5 criteria are present with 4-5 errors
2 of 5 criteria are present OR 3 of 5 criteria are present with 2-3
errors OR 4 of 5 criteria are present with 4-5 errors OR all 5
criteria are present with 6-7 errors
0 or 1 of 5 criteria are present OR 2 of 5 criteria are present
with 2-3 errors OR 3 of 5 criteria are present with 4-5 errors OR
4 of 5 criteria are present with 6-7 errors OR all 5 criteria are
present with more than 7 errors
Conclusion –(5 criteria)
Clearly stated within the last 1-2 paragraphs; briefly restated
the thesis; summarized the main points of the argument;
demonstrated insight & understanding regarding the
question(s); free of grammar & spelling errors
All 5 criteria are present with 0-1 error
4 of 5 criteria are present OR all 5 criteria are present with 2-3
errors
3 of 5 criteria are present OR 4 of 5 criteria are present with 2-3
errors OR all 5 criteria are present with 4-5 errors
2 of 5 criteria are present OR 3 of 5 criteria are present with 2-3
errors OR 4 of 5 criteria are present with 4-5 errors OR all 5
criteria are present with 6-7 errors
0 or 1 of 5 criteria are present OR 2 of 5 criteria are present
with 2-3 errors OR 3 of 5 criteria are present with 4-5 errors OR
4 of 5 criteria are present with 6-7 errors OR all 5 criteria are
6. present with more than 7 errors
RESEARCH ARTICLE
A qualitative exploration of clinicians’
strategies to communicate risks to patients in
the complex reality of clinical practice
Romy RichterID
1*, Esther Giroldi1,2, Jesse Jansen1, Trudy van der Weijden1
1 Department of Family Medicine, School Care and Public
Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of
Health Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht
University, Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands,
2 Department of Educational Development and Research,
School of Health Professions Education (SHE),
Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML),
Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg,
Netherlands
* [email protected]
Abstract
Background
Risk communication, situated in the model of shared decision
making (SDM), is an essential
7. element in daily clinical practice. The scientific literature
makes a number of generic recom-
mendations. Yet the application of risk communication remains
a challenge in patient-clini-
cian encounters. How clinicians actually communicate risk
during consultations is not well
understood. We aimed to explore the risk communication
strategies used by clinicians and
extract narratives and visualizations of those strategies to help
inform medical education.
Methods
In this qualitative descriptive study, we interviewed fifteen
purposely sampled clinicians from
several medical disciplines, who were familiar with the concept
of SDM. Deductive and
inductive content analysis was used during an iterative data
collection and analyses
process.
Results
Our study identified various strategies reported to be used by
clinicians to address the com-
plexities of risk communication such as dealing with
uncertainty. These included verbal,
8. numerical and visual risk communication and framing.
Clinicians were familiar with recom-
mended risk formats such as natural frequencies and population
pictograms. However, it
became clear that clinicians’ expertise and communication goals
also play an important role
in the risk talk. Clinicians try to lay a foundation for balanced
decision-making and to incorpo-
rate patient preferences while faced with several challenges
such as the dilemma of raising
awareness but triggering anxiety or fan fear in patients.
Consequently, they also use com-
munication goals such as influencing mindset and reassuring
patients. Additionally, clini-
cians frequently have to account for the illusion of certainty in
the risk talk.
PLOS ONE
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 1 / 22
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
9. a1111111111
a1111111111
OPEN ACCESS
Citation: Richter R, Giroldi E, Jansen J, van der
Weijden T (2020) A qualitative exploration of
clinicians’ strategies to communicate risks to
patients in the complex reality of clinical practice.
PLoS ONE 15(8): e0236751. https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
Editor: Andrew Soundy, University of Birmingham,
UNITED KINGDOM
Received: March 4, 2020
Accepted: July 13, 2020
Published: August 13, 2020
Peer Review History: PLOS recognizes the
benefits of transparency in the peer review
process; therefore, we enable the publication of
all of the content of peer review and author
12. The latter concept is based on an iterative approach comprising
three phases: team talk, option
talk and decision talk. The communication of risks and benefits
(risk communication) is an
essential part of the option talk in which various screening,
diagnostic, treatment or palliative
alternatives are compared [2,4–9].
In recent years, the focus has increasingly been on the varying
formats and methods of
communicating risks to patients in an effective way [10–12]. It
has been established that cer-
tain risk formats affect the perception of risk and subsequent
decisions [13–18]. Broadly speak-
ing, three formats of communicating risk can be distinguished:
verbal, numerical and
graphical. Verbal risk communication refers to the use of
descriptive labels such as “high risk”
or “low risk”. This qualitative description of risks leaves room
for interpretation and thus leads
to ambiguity of definition [19,20]. Consequently, a growing
body of scientific evidence points
to the communication of risk in numerical terms. Numerical
formats include percentages, e.g.
13. 20% probability of a heart attack, and natural frequencies, e.g.
20 in 100 cases. Natural frequen-
cies seem to be easier to understand than percentages
[6,10,21,22]. Notwithstanding the grow-
ing supportive body of evidence for numeric risk
communication formats, risk
communication faces challenges. Numerical health illiteracy has
been shown in patients, and
also in many clinicians [10,12,21,23,24]. In recent years, a
number of researchers have
addressed the graphical display of risks by methods such as
population pictographs (icon
arrays), bar charts and risk ladders [5,25–28]. While pictograms
have been proven useful in
clinical conversations [20,29,30], however, overall the
understanding of graphical risk presen-
tation remains unclear [31,32].
Risk information can be given in a number of ways; this is
known as framing [12,33]. Risk
messages can be framed in terms of gain versus loss (goal
framing). For instance, taking a medi-
cation will increase the chance of not getting a disease versus
not taking the medication will
increase the chance of getting the disease. Another approach is
14. to describe the information in
terms of positive versus negative framing (attribute framing),
e.g. a patient can either be told
there is an 80% chance of survival or a 20% chance of dying
[12,33,34]. Choice of framing influ-
ences the perception of risks and hence the decision made
during a clinical consultation [15].
An inherent part of risk communication is uncertainty, which
can take multiple forms. A
number of frameworks have classified uncertainty [35,36],
however, there is still no consensus
on a uniform categorization of uncertainty [12,37,38]. Looking
at the judgement and decision-
making literature, two dimensions of uncertainty are often
distinguished: aleatoric and episte-
mic. Aleatoric uncertainty refers to the natural randomness in a
process (stochastic uncer-
tainty). Each time an experiment is conducted under similar
conditions, the outcome may
PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 2 / 22
identifiable information, the transcribed interviews
15. are available on request.
Funding: The author(s) received no specific
funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared
that no competing interests exist.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
differ. Epistemic uncertainty results from limited data and
knowledge of a fact (that is either
true or not true) [39]. Humans in general, thus patients and
doctors, are faced with the illusion
of certainty in daily and clinical life. A clear presentation of
uncertainty seems to be one of the
most difficult parts of communicating risks [12,37].
Presentation formats can vary from verbal
to numerical or visual. The effect of communicating uncertainty
has not been well studied,
hence it is unclear what types of uncertainty should be
communicated and to what extent
[38,40]. Efficient ways to communicate uncertainty are still
under debate and there is little
guidance on best practice approaches [12,37,38].
16. Despite theoretical insights into recommendations for preferred
risk communication for-
mats [10,12,21,34,41,42], risk communication remains a major
challenge [9,12,21,23]. The var-
ious medical disciplines with their different contexts demand
clinicians to nuance the risk talk
sensitively to specific aspects of their discipline. For example,
in clinical genetics risk commu-
nication needs to address predictive testing such as the small
chance of getting a false positive
test result or the small chance of miscarriage in invasive testing
[43]. Thus, clinical geneticists
often have to deal with communicating small and difficult to
imagine risks that could have a
great impact in the future of the patient. General practitioners
often counsel the patient for
more general problems in the present, while doctor and patient
usually have a closer and con-
tinuous relationship with repetitive opportunities for a dialogue
and reassurance of the patient.
Whereas surgeons often have to communicate the side effects
and consequences of severe sur-
gical procedures under time pressure while having seen the
patient one or two times in the
17. hospital. On the other hand, oncologists often have to consider
the communication of over-
treatment and overdiagnosis when discussing screening and
treatment options, especially
when dealing with frail elderly patients. Undoubtedly, risk
communication is a core skill for
clinical counsellors in various medical disciplines. However, as
far as we know, the literature
mainly provides formalistic or standardized language on written
communication of numerical
and visual risk communication formats and lacks practical and
illustrative examples of how to
communicate risks to patients in daily clinical practice.
Research emphasizes that trainees are
in need of concrete illustrations of meaningful language and
graphical examples in order to
acquire complex communication skills [44,45]. The provision of
illustrative risk communica-
tion strategies in the SDM concept could support educational
training programs. Altogether,
this points to a potential gap between theoretical
recommendations in literature and ease of
application in clinical practice.
18. The aim is to add to the existing literature on risk
communication by gaining a deeper
understanding of the clinician’s actual strategies in
communicating risk in daily clinical prac-
tice. A comprehensive insight into the best practice approaches
of a sample of clinicians who
have experience of, or are at least familiar with, the concept of
SDM, may provide valuable
examples of real life risk communication strategies, which
could support trainees in the pro-
cess of acquiring SDM skills [44]. In line with Lingard´s theory
on communities of expertise,
we took the view that as members of a community, clinicians
have developed a certain profes-
sional expertise on how to communicate risk to patients [46,47].
To promote the development
of risk communication training for trainees, we explored the
strategies used by clinicians to
communicate risk to patients and aimed to extract illustrative
examples (narratives) and visu-
alizations of these strategies.
Methods
Study design
19. We conducted a qualitative descriptive study with semi-
structured interviews. We took the
ontological orientation of relativism, which holds the view that
multiple subjective realities
PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 3 / 22
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
exist. Consequently, we chose the epistemological orientation of
subjectivism referring to the
existence of many interpretations of reality, and to clinicians’
risk communication strategies
being subjectively developed in relation to the clinical situation
[48]. The consolidated criteria
for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) has been used to
guide reporting of the research
[49].
Ethical approval and informed consent
The NVMO Ethical Review Board granted approval for our
study. Clinicians were informed
about the study via e-mail. In this e-mail the research was
described, and the goal was stated,
20. and the clinicians were asked whether they like to participate in
a qualitative interview. Subse-
quently, clinicians gave written informed consent (via e-mail)
whether they were willing to
participate. Further, verbal consent was obtained before the
start of the interview, just before
the audiotape had been started. Verbal informed consent was
given for audiotaping and using
the data for publication in a scientific journal. Verbatim
transcripts of the recorded interviews
were anonymized with codes.
Conceptual framework
Risk communication is defined as: “The open, two-way
exchange of information and opinion
about risk, leading to a better understanding of the risk in
question, and promoting better
(clinical) decisions about management” [34,50]. We sited risk
communication as the so-called
“risk talk” within the option talk in accordance with one of the
models of SDM [2,9]. In order
to display a theoretical foundation and establish the current
state of knowledge regarding risk
communication strategies [10,12,34,41] a deductive conceptual
21. framework based on a litera-
ture review was generated (Fig 1). This framework steadily
guided the data collection and anal-
ysis process. Other risk communication strategies, clinician
goals, content and contextual
Fig 1. Framework Risk Communication (RC). AR(R) = Absolute
Risk (Reduction), RR(R) = Relative Risk
(Reduction), NNT = Number Needed to Treat.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751.g001
PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 4 / 22
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751.g001
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
factors (patient, clinician, consultation) and challenges of risk
communication were captured
during the data collection process using an inductive approach.
Subsequently, we created a
new framework with the aim of reflecting the complexity of risk
communication in daily clini-
cal practice (Fig 2, Results section).
22. Study population and sampling strategy
We used convenience sampling facilitated by the research
team’s network in Germany and the
Netherlands to identify clinicians who were (a) experienced or
at least familiar with the con-
cept of SDM, and (b) known to regularly need to communicate
risks to their patients. In order
to obtain a broad spectrum of perspectives, sampling was based
on gender, age, experience
and clinical field (general practice, gynecology, nephrology,
neurology, genetics, surgery and
orthopedics) [51]. We invited 16 clinicians via e-mail, one of
whom declined due to lack of
time. The final sample consisted of 15 experts. Sampling was
part of the iterative process of
data collection and analysis and was stopped once data
saturation was reached.
Data collection method
The primary female researcher (RR) carried out semi-structured
qualitative interviews [52] at
a location preferred by the interviewee. The participants were
not known to the primary re-
searcher (RR). Based on the literature review, a semi-structured
interview guide (S1 Appendix)
23. Fig 2. Framework clinicians’ communication goals and
challenges in Risk Communication (RC) and influencing
Contextual Factors (CF).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751.g002
PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 5 / 22
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751.g002
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
with open-ended questions was developed. In the introduction
section of the interview partici-
pants were again informed about the goal of the research and
consequently asked whether they
would like to participate (S1 Appendix). Verbal consent was
obtained in the interview session
just before the audiotape was started. A pilot interview was
conducted to test the preliminary
interview guide [52]. Firstly, background information about the
professional role was obtained.
Interviewees were asked to give their definition of risk
communication. Initially interviewees
were asked to illustrate their risk communication strategies
24. using pre-existing cardiovascular
disease (CVD) or oncology patient cases. After two interviews
it became obvious that the best
approach to reveal authentic strategies was induced through
self-chosen patient cases. Ques-
tions were posed according to the five risk communication
categories (Fig 1). Insight accrued
during the course of data collection led to minor adjustments in
the interview guide.
Data analysis
All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim.
Additionally, drawings made by
interviewees were added to the transcript. We started with a
deductive content analysis to
gather risk communication strategies according to the categories
described in the framework.
Collaterally, the inductive approach was used to capture and
group new aspects concerning cli-
nician goals, challenges and dilemmas, risk communication
strategies and content and con-
text-related factors with no preconceived ideas [53]. Text
fragments were coded in the
software program QUIRKOS. During the data analysis process a
schematic table presenting an
25. overview of risk communication strategies with illustrative
example sentences (narratives) and
influencing contextual factors was created. Risk communication
narratives were defined as
illustrative example sentences that were used in the consultation
room. Two researchers (RR
and EG or TW) independently analyzed the transcripts. Their
backgrounds are PhD (EG) and
MA (RR) in health sciences and PhD in medicine (TW). The
researchers reached consensus
on the coding through discussion. Detailed information on the
analysis can be found in the
AUDIT trail (S4 Appendix).
Techniques to enhance trustworthiness
The data collection was constantly driven by the research
question. The theoretical framework
based on the literature review was critically verified, reflected
upon and adjusted. Diversity
and richness of data was enhanced by including participants
from a range of clinician back-
grounds. A pilot interview verified the relevance of content of
the preliminary interview guide
and revealed the need for reformulation and adjustment. The
26. semi-structured interview guide
comprising broad questions left enough latitude for the
interviewee to answer [52]. The itera-
tive process of data collection and analysis allowed the
researcher to steadily inform data col-
lection by refining the focus in subsequent interviews.
Moreover, re-examining the data in the
iterative data analysis led to a continuous meaning making. A
member check enabled the par-
ticipants to comment on the interview transcripts and the first
version of the article thus
strengthening the credibility of data [54–58]. Transcripts were
always independently coded by
two researchers (RR and EG or RR and TW) and discussed.
Analysis and interpretation were
additionally discussed in the research team (investigator
triangulation) [57,58].
Results
Sample characteristics
The sample consisted of ten female and five male clinicians of
varying ages. Twelve of the 15
interviewees worked in the Netherlands and three in Germany.
Among the clinicians were two
27. PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 6 / 22
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
nurses, three specialist-in-training and ten physicians. Table 1
gives a detailed description of
their characteristics.
Interviews
The average length of interviews was 34 minutes. Eleven
interviews were conducted face-to-face
in a relaxed office setting and four were conducted over the
telephone. One doctor was on-call
during the interview, for this reason the interview was
interrupted three times. Obtaining narra-
tives for the applied risk communication strategies in clinical
practice was more difficult to
achieve in some interviews than others. However, by asking
prompting questions it was possible
to elicit narratives at every interview. Giving the interviewee
latitude to choose their own patient
case was especially valuable in assuring elicitation of risk
communication strategies that are actu-
28. ally used on a routine basis. After 15 interviews saturation of
data was reached as no new strategies
emerged according to the categories of the framework (Fig 1).
In some interviews we were able to
obtain more detailed patient cases, which illustrated the routine
of risk communication in an
exemplary fashion (S2 Appendix). The strong link between
SDM and risk communication
became evident as interviewees frequently gave comprehensive
statements and illustrations, not
only concerning the risk communication format itself, but also
for choice or option talk.
Types of risk
Due to the heterogeneous sample, the interviewees covered a
variety of diseases and disorders
of varying degrees of severity, duration of treatment and
impact. These ranged from a number
of types of cancer, cardiovascular risk, chronic diseases such as
diabetes and multiple sclerosis,
and risk-related to parental-diagnostic and embryology/in-vitro
fertilization. These diseases
and disorders were perceived as being related to various
different types of risk (Table 2) that
29. influence the risk communication process.
Main findings
The main findings will be presented, comprising the clinician
communication goals and chal-
lenges they face in risk communication and the risk
communication strategies they utilize.
Table 1. Characteristics of the interviewees.
Clinician Gender Age category Profession discipline Country
Interview language
C01 male 60–69 General Practice NL English
C02 female 40–49 General Practice-Elderly Care NL English
C03 female 40–49 General Practice NL Dutch
C04 male 50–59 General Practice NL Dutch
C05 female 40–49 Gynecology NL Dutch
C06 female 50–59 Radiotherapy—Oncology NL English
C07 female 40–49 Internal Medicine—Nephrology NL English
C08 male 30–39 Internal Medicine—Hematology NL Dutch
C09 male 60–69 Head and Neck Surgery—Oncology NL English
C10 female 30–39 Neurology GE German
C11 female 30–39 Neurology GE German
30. C12 female 40–49 Neurology GE German
C13 female 60–69 Clinical Genetics NL English
C14 female 50–59 Clinical Genetics NL Dutch
C15 male 30–39 Orthopedics NL Dutch
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751.t001
PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 7 / 22
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751.t001
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
Contextual factors that shape the risk talk will also be
introduced. Fig 2 shows the interaction
between those elements with contextual factors (at clinician and
patient level) shaping risk
communication in daily clinical practice (grey circle).
Clinicians apply different risk commu-
nication strategies (dark blue gearwheel, Fig 2) that are linked
to certain communication goals
(medium blue gearwheel, Fig 2). During the process of
communicating risk, clinicians face
31. multiple challenges (light blue gearwheel, Fig 2). Hence, the
three gearwheels interact in risk
communication. The results will be described in an interactive
way as the Fig 2 illustrates.
Findings will be described and underpinned with illustrative
quotes and drawings. The narra-
tives in the quotes are presented in italics. Additional narratives
and drawings can be found in
S3 Appendix. For ease of reading the keywords used in Fig 2
are highlighted in bold in the
results section.
Overall, participants regarded risk communication as an integral
part of SDM that allows
for balanced decision-making, and to which appropriate time
and consideration should be
given.
We are actually moving pretty quickly from risk communication
to “Well, these are your
options—and what are we going to do?”. So [. . .] going too
quickly through the circle of
shared decision-making. While [. . .] if people understand this
[risk communication] well, I
think they are more receptive to the following steps [of shared
decision making].
32. —Interview C04 General Practice—
Thus, in this sample of clinicians, it was not questioned whether
or not to conduct a ‘risk
talk’ but rather how to communicate risks when facing each
unique patient and situation. The
participants emphasized that the complex process of risk
communication is highly dependent
on a number of contextual factors related to the consultation
and patient (grey circle, Fig 2).
Clinicians stated that the consultation setting whether in a
hospital or other type of practice
and the availability of tools and time for the risk talk may shape
the risk communication.
Table 2. Types of risk.
Risk of disease/event
• in a healthy patient with an unknown risk, e.g. CVD, cancer
• in an unborn child or embryo
Risk of recurrence of disease/event
• in a patient already diagnosed with e.g. CVD or cancer
Risk of deterioration of symptoms /condition/ quality of life
• in a patient with a chronic condition e.g. Chronic kidney
disease, cancer
33. Risk of dying and end-of life
• in a frail patient or one with a chronic condition e.g. chronic
kidney disease, cancer
Risk of side effects of treatment
• in invasive treatment such as surgery
• in patients with acute or chronic disease
Risk of treatment or diagnostic burden
• e.g. in surgery, drug treatment with high number of doses per
day
• e.g. in invasive, painful or frightening diagnostic procedure
Risk of overtreatment
• e.g. resuscitation in cardiac events
• e.g. screening for disease in healthy persons
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751.t002
PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 8 / 22
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751.t002
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
34. They agreed that risk communication is highly dependent on the
patient’s unique context
(such as patient and family history and his/her physical and
mental condition). Clinicians
consistently named health literacy as an important factor in
influencing the risk talk. Overall,
interviewees viewed a certain minimum level of health literacy
as conditional for effective risk
communication. Some clinicians deliberately skipped the risk
talk in patients with a low level
of literacy. One doctor emphasized the use of a stepwise
approach: first estimate the health lit-
eracy level of the patient and subsequently adjust the risk talk.
First, I check for [level of] health literacy. If that is low, I will
skip most of my [risk] talks
and try to reach them on their level, somewhere. [. . .] for risk
communication there needs
to be some kind of standard or platform that people are on
already.
—Interview C04 General Practice—
During the course of data collection, it became evident that risk
communication is clearly
shaped by clinicians’ own risk communication strategies and
35. their communication goals. The
clinicians frequently aimed to tailor the risk talk to the
preferences of the patient for certain
medical options. This approach was reported to have an impact
on whether clinicians go into
detail when giving information about a certain medical option.
One doctor mentioned that tai-
loring the risk talk to the preferences of the patient reduces the
amount of risk information to
deliver. That goal was to counteract the challenge of selective
listening by the patient due to
the amount of information delivered.
So, I put a lot of effort in discussing with the patient what is
important for them. What are
their goals for the short term and for the long term? And [. . .]
when I know what is impor-
tant [for them], only after that I start discussing risk. [. . .] And
then I explain, "Well I’ll tell
you about this treatment and that treatment. I haven’t told you a
lot about this third treat-
ment because what I understand from you is that you don't want
an operation”–an MRI for
example. [. . .] And that helps me a lot with my risk
communication because then the
amount of risks that need to be discussed will decrease.
36. —Interview C02 General Practice—
By means of the risk talk clinicians seek to lay a foundation for
a balanced decision-mak-
ing. Participants reported that they applied different risk
communication formats in their con-
sultations, such as verbal and numerical risk communication.
Overall, clinicians agreed that
communication in verbal terms only leads to ambiguity in
definition of the risk size. Nonethe-
less, some clinicians reported that they describe the risk in
verbal terms only in situations
where numbers were not available due to lack of knowledge for
example, or the non-applica-
tion of a tool that could have provided information about the
size of the risk. Another justifica-
tion for verbal phrasing of risks was situations in which
clinicians passed on information
about a very small or a very high risk.
But sometimes, I must admit that I do use those words
occasionally. [. . .] I let myself be
tempted to say there is a very small chance [. . .] especially if
the odds are very high or very
low, then I say so. So, if 95% of people recover, I don’t say, 19
37. of the 20 recover but then I
often say, “Almost everyone recovers.”
—Interview C08 Internal Medicine—Hematology—
PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 9 / 22
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
Most clinicians stated that they prefer natural frequencies
instead of percentages because
natural frequencies are easier for patients to understand. A
small number of clinicians reported
that they only use percentages to communicate a risk estimate.
Interviewees said that their
choice to use this format was influenced if in their estimation
the patient had a higher level of
numeracy. Some clinicians reported using both percentages and
natural frequencies. Most par-
ticipants felt that percentages are quite abstract and should be
avoided.
Then I say, “And now there is a side effect that, do not be
afraid, it sounds now a bit scary,
38. but it is very rare, however it is very dangerous, and you have
to know that it exists. Namely
in XX of 1000 people, a [. . .] encephalitis can occur [. . .].”
—Interview C11 Neurology—
If a change in risk was reported, the participants stated that they
had a preference for abso-
lute risk since the presentation of relative risk alone can lead to
biased perception of risk size as
the reference value is missing. Interviewees seldom mentioned
the concept of number needed
to treat (NNT).
But the absolute [risk] is much more important than the
percentage, I think. With that [rel-
ative risk] you can impress a patient: ’You have a 50% risk
reduction.’ But it depends on
how big the baseline risk is and what the absolute risk is. So, I
think the relative risk reduc-
tion is not so exciting.
—Interview C03 General Practice—
In the process of achieving their goal of laying a balanced
foundation for decision-making,
clinicians encounter a number of challenges in daily clinical
practice. They repeatedly stated
39. that it is difficult for patients to comprehend abstract risk
estimates. Some clinicians talked
about the influence of the risk size that imposes additional
challenges to risk communication,
as it impacts on the patient’s risk perception. For example,
some participants stated that the
patient´s emotional arousal may influence their perception of
risk, and potentially their inter-
pretation of the size of the risk, therefore the right time point
for risk communication should
be carefully chosen. Some clinicians reported that the indirect
experiences of the patient’s sig-
nificant others seem to have an impact on the patient’s
perception of risk. Clinicians observed
that the occurrence of disease can bias the patient´s sense of
risk size towards 100%. They also
mentioned that patients apparently do not always relate the
population-based risk estimate to
themselves or may deny having been informed about a certain
risk at an earlier consultation—
in the setting of clinical genetics for example—when a small
risk of a serious outcome had
indeed been communicated by a clinician. Furthermore, in the
process of informing the
40. patient, clinicians reported that they are frequently confronted
with the challenge of “raising
awareness of a risk versus fanning fear and anxiety in patients”.
This aspect seems difficult
to balance for the clinicians, as on the one hand they aim to
inform patients that real risks do
exist and on the other hand, they do not want to frighten the
patient.
You want to do it in a way that is understandable, you want
them to understand that there
are real risks, but you also don’t want to make them too anxious
and to scare them, because
sometimes you can also induce fright through risk
communication.
—Interview C15 Orthopedics—
PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 10 / 22
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
Hence, the framing of risk messages was regarded as important.
Clinicians reported trying
41. to use both positive and negative framing, but only a few
clinicians stated that they always
applied the two strategies in order to be as neutral as possible.
One clinician had a clear prefer-
ence for positive framing, which the interviewee explained was
related to their own personal-
ity. Interviewees said that their choice of strategy was
influenced by the context, i.e. if the
patient was healthy or suffering from a disease, the size of the
risk, and patient emotions and
patient preferences. Clinicians described using negative framing
in high-risk patients such as
those with CVD in order to illustrate and emphasize the risk of
a heart attack through smok-
ing. Positive framing was also reported as one means of
reassuring patients.
For example, recently on the ward someone said, “Oh I’m
scared that next month I will have
the disease back”. I knew that the chance that the lady would
have the disease back in the fol-
lowing month was very small. But it wasn’t zero. And if I had
said to her “You have a 1 in 10
chance that you will have the disease back next month”, she
would have been worried the
whole evening. But I said to her “Well the chance is 9 in 10 that
it will all go well” and she
42. was reassured. Then I was actually using risk communication [.
. .] framed to the patient
and to also support her a little bit.
—Interview C08 Internal Medicine—Hematology—
Furthermore, clinicians said that they tried to reassure the
patient by putting the risk into
perspective. In risk talks about small risks some clinicians
reported that they related the small
risk to experiences with similar cases, or in general to highlight
the high chance of a positive
outcome. One clinician also used the illustration of the natural
fluctuation in organ function to
comfort the patient.
[. . .] people don’t understand that 0.0001%. But what kind of
chance is that? [. . .] what I lit-
erally say is, “I have to tell this number to you but in my
experience in my practice I haven't
seen or I've only seen one or two patients who lost their kidney
because of a bleeding after a
kidney biopsy I would do many many kidney biopsies and it
almost always goes good [. . .].”
—Interview C07 Internal Medicine—Nephrology—
Overall, clinicians considered graphical support to be very
helpful for putting risks into per-
43. spective, often in relation to time (e.g. 10-year risk, lifetime
risk). Clinicians most frequently
reported using population pictograms to illustrate the
occurrence of a certain outcome or of
side effects. Another tool that was repeatedly mentioned by GPs
was a color-coded table of car-
diovascular disease risk that illustrates the 10-year absolute
risks for various high and low risk
categories [52]. Another tool interviewees reported to use was
bar charts. A smaller number of
clinicians also said they used self-made drawings. Two
examples are shown here (for further
examples see S3 Appendix). Fig 3 shows an illustration by an
oncologist of the likelihood of
dying over time in which stem cell transplantation treatment is
compared with the natural
course of leukemia to make the patient aware of the risk of
treatment (Fig 3). Another clinician
illustrated the peak age of breast cancer in a diagram (Fig 3).
A few clinicians said they used metaphors or visual analogues
to put the risk into perspec-
tive. As a reason for using metaphors, one clinician mentioned
that metaphors support a
44. patient’s comprehension because the picture of a certain item
allows them to grasp the size of a
certain risk better than abstract numbers alone would. One
example of putting a risk into per-
spective was making a comparison with the lottery. To illustrate
risk size, another clinician
depicted a 50:50 risk by using weighing scales or the odds of
having a son or a daughter. To
PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 11 / 22
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
visualize the concept of uncertainty one clinician explained to
utilize the picture of a crystal
ball. Another reported using the metaphor of an umbrella to
visualize the uncertainty that is
inevitably part of life and each individual’s subjectivity that
leads to differences in risk percep-
tion and risk seeking.
If you look up at a cloudy sky, and you ask ten people if they
want to take an umbrella or
not, then some of them will always take an umbrella, some
45. never will, and some may,
depending on how cloudy the sky is. [. . .] But it is not about
whether I would like to take an
umbrella, it is about, “Do you want to take an umbrella?” [. . .]
one person might not mind
walking around carrying an umbrella the whole day for nothing,
because she definitely
doesn’t want to have her new perm spoiled. And the other
person thinks ’I’m really not
going to walk around all day with that umbrella.’
—Interview C05 Gynecology—
Uncertainty is inherent in the whole risk communication process
and clinicians repeatedly
spoke of challenges in dealing with this complex concept in
their daily clinical practice. Some
clinicians reported that they communicated epistemic
uncertainty in general descriptive verbal
terms in situations where there is a lack of evidence.
Fig 3. Self-drawn diagrams of interviewees to visually support
risk communication.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751.g003
PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
46. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 12 / 22
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751.g003
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
Yeah, I communicated it [uncertainty] a little bit more open. I
say, “In your case we don’t
know exactly what is going to work because there isn’t a lot of
research supporting therapies
or treatments for your disease or for your case. So, we need to
have trial and error what is
working for you.”—Interview C02 General Practice—
All clinicians stated that they communicate aleatoric uncertainty
verbally. The use of confi-
dence intervals was regarded as too difficult for patients to
understand. Two clinicians who are
frequently involved in communication on the prognosis of
serious disease reported using the
strategy of giving a range instead of a precise risk estimate.
These interviewees explained that
this approach helps to prevent patients holding on to a fixed
deadline which has a strong emo-
tional impact as the patient then expects to die at the forecasted
time. Therefore, one clinician
47. only spoke of an average life expectancy if directly asked by the
patient.
In this case [concerning average survival] [. . .] I don´t find it
useful for people to know an
exact number. And when people ask: ‘Can you tell me what the
average survival is?’ Well
then, I have to say approximately six months, but I try not to do
that at the beginning,. [. . .]
I find it very unpleasant to give a set time. Because there just
isn’t one. We only know the
average of 100 comparable patients.
—Interview C08 Internal Medicine—Hematology—
I have seen patients with chance of 95% for cure. And they die.
And the other way around,
patients incurable and they survive. [. . .] You never know. [. .
.] if you have 1000 patients
[. . .]. 90% will survive or 90% will die. [. . .] “But then again
that doesn’t say anything about
you.We don’t know.” [. . .] doctors who say: ’Ok you have [. . .]
three months because if you
have 1000 patients with the same disease, one patient will
survive one hour, and one will
survive 10 years and the mean is three months.’ [. . .] But I
never use these kinds of indica-
48. tions. Because I think it’s harmful. Because I had patients and
then they said: ’Ok, I was
with the medical Oncology and he said I have two months to
go.’ And then [they think] it’s
the last visit. And then they said goodbye. And this lady [. . .]
she came back in December,
still in a good condition. And we were just a bit talking and
[she] said yeah: ’The problem is
I gave all my stuff for Christmas away. What shall I do?’, I say,
“Yeah, you have to ask it
back.”[. . .] And she died next year in in June.
—Interview C09 Head and Neck Surgery—Oncology—
Some clinicians reported that they aimed to influence the
mindset of the patient. One
interviewee who is involved in the treatment of severe disorders
tried to make patients aware
that death is an undeniable fact of life, and that treatment does
not necessarily result in cure.
Therefore, that clinician emphasized that it is important to
accept death and to make treatment
choices that are not based on fear, but based on life choices
consistent with the patient’s own
values.
49. [. . .] as soon as you accept that you will die, then a lot of
uncertainty and a lot of anxiety is
gone. Because the death is always behind you. So, if you turn
around and say, “Okay, I know
I know you are there. So, one day you win.” [. . .] Because if
you are afraid to die and if that’
the reason to have the surgery than you take the wrong decision
because you will die any-
way. Better to get used to the idea that you will die.
—Interview C09 Head and Neck Surgery—Oncology—
PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 13 / 22
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
The clinicians said they wanted their patients to understand that
despite treatment, the risk
or risk reduction usually does not approach 0%. In situations
related to a medical test such as
screening in asymptomatic patients, clinicians might want
patients to understand that the test
may also lead to additional risks related to overtreatment.
Another aspect of risk communica-
50. tion, which clinicians repeatedly mentioned as challenging to
communicate to patients, is the
treatment burden in relation to the challenge of “quality versus
quantity of life”. Quality and
quantity were regarded as problematic to weigh against one
another since concrete numbers
for individual patients are lacking. Therefore, clinicians aimed
to influence the patients’ mind-
set by making them thoroughly consider the trade-off between
quality and quantity of life. Pre-
dominantly in situations related to impactful treatment
clinicians aimed to draw the patients’
attention to the fact that the treatment might have a negative
effect that could lead to a decline
in quality of life. This awareness potentially supports the laying
of the foundation for balanced
decision-making for the patient.
And if you have tried all kinds of different statins then you also
try to put it into perspective
and look at it this way “But how much quality of life have you
lost due to the side effects you
have?” And that cannot be expressed as a single estimate, as it
is related to the experience of
the patient. “And suppose you belong to that group of patients
who have been taking it all
51. these years, but actually do not benefit from it, because it’s
only some of the 100 people who
benefit from it, does that still affect your decision to continue
or not?” [. . .]
—Interview C03 General Practice—
In the complex risk talk the experiences and expertise of the
clinicians play an important
role. Some clinicians reported the goal of steering the patient
towards a certain decision.
This approach is manifested by the clinician emphasizing a
certain risk more than other out-
comes. It was reported to be used in situations such as the
choice for elective surgery where on
the basis on his sound medical insights and experiences with
similar cases, the doctor deemed
a patient as not such a good candidate for surgery. Thus, this
goal was not related to steering
the patient towards the doctor’s treatment preference but to
make high risk patients thor-
oughly consider the side effects of treatment.
[. . .] in a patient when you explain a certain surgical therapy.
But you think that the patient
is not entirely eligible for it, or that he or she behaves in a
certain way, or has a certain other
52. comorbidity [. . .] then you also use risk communication to
emphasize that there really is [a
risk]–thus you make those risks a little bit bigger in your
explanation.
—Interview C15 Orthopedics—
Discussion
Main findings
The aim of this study is to give an overview of clinician’s
strategies to communicate risk in
daily clinical practice with illustrative examples. Risk
communication in this study is shaped
by various contextual factors at the consultation and patient
level, as well as clinicians’ specific
communication goals. When communicating risk to patients,
clinicians face various challenges
and uncertainties that may go beyond choosing the appropriate
risk format. The majority of
risk communication literature seems to focus on examining
different risk communication for-
mats that are often isolated from the daily clinical context.
[5,10–13,17,22]. Our findings reveal
PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
53. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 14 / 22
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
what actually shapes risk communication in clinical practice,
thereby elucidating the interac-
tion between the expertise of clinicians and their specific
communication goals, the choice of a
certain strategy and the challenges they face in daily practice.
Clinicians apply a number of risk communication strategies in
order to lay a foundation for
balanced decision-making. Consequently, clinicians make the
patient aware of a certain risk.
As pointed out by the extensive literature on judgement and
decision-making, the risk com-
munication process is prone to heuristics and biases [59–63].
Raised awareness of the risk
through a risk talk leads to further challenges for clinicians to
address. The patient´s risk per-
ception plays a major role: a small risk of a severe disorder or a
medium risk of a mild disorder
can be perceived differently. Depending on the context, in the
field of embryology for example,
the communication of small -but nonetheless impactful- risks
54. can strongly affect the emotional
impact on the patient. Thus, clinicians are repeatedly confronted
with the challenging dilemma
of raising awareness and fanning fear in patients, emphasizing
the importance of phrasing the
risk message sensitively. There seems to be a need for clinicians
to develop skills/strategies to
communicate risks without increasing fear [64]. As shown in
our study, clinicians repeatedly
tried to reassure patients by putting the risk into perspective by
using comparisons with expe-
riences from other cases, or the use of visual formats. Some
participants stated to use verbal
analogues or metaphors to put risks into perspective. Although
there is not much to be found
in the scientific literature regarding the use of metaphors and
visual analogues [65,66], it
seems to be a relevant concept, especially in relation to the
illustration of aspects of uncer-
tainty. Clinicians noted that the concept of the uncertainty that
is inherently present in life is
challenging to explain to patients. It is difficult for patients to
grasp that numbers are only esti-
mates based on a sample of the population. Furthermore, it is
55. important for patients to be
aware of the illusion of certainty, therefore some clinicians
tried to influence the mindset of
patients by making them aware of aspects of uncertainty in
decision-making and life in gen-
eral: e.g. treatment does not necessarily mean cure and despite
the treatment a risk hardly
approaches 0%. Therefore, thorough consideration of the
aspects of the quality and quantity of
life in life-threatening treatment decisions for example, is
important to patients. It should be
noted that clinicians need to develop a certain expertise
concerning the more sensitive aspects
of risk communication such as a patient’s emotions.
Previous literature on doctor-patient communication empirically
supports both the con-
text-specific and goal-directed nature of communication [67–
71]. As presented in this study,
the risk communication process is influenced by different
contextual factors at the consulta-
tion, patient and clinician level. Risk communication has to be
sensitive to the context of the
consultation (context-specific), e.g. concerning practical aspects
such as time pressure or
56. patient aspects such as their emotions. Risk communication is
also goal-directed as clinicians
apply specific communication goals in the process. Those
specific communication goals vary
and might depend on e.g. patient preferences, but they can also
be driven by clinicians’ prefer-
ences and expertise. For example, clinicians might aim to
influence the lifestyle of the patient
or to make high risk patients thoroughly consider the side
effects of a treatment. Clinicians
adapt how they present risk accordingly. Therefore, risk
communication is not merely to be
satisfied with a standardized stepwise approach of the “right”
risk communication format/
strategy, considering the uniqueness of situations in daily
clinical practice. A holistic, context-
specific and goal-directed approach to teaching risk
communication seems to be needed.
The complexity of risk communication also became evident
during the search for a theory/
framework that could support the data collection and analysis
process of this study. There was
little guidance on a framework for risk communication in the
clinical consultation setting. A
57. larger body of scientific literature on risk communication
focuses on risk communication con-
cepts in catastrophe or crisis management [72–75]. Research on
risk communication in the
PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 15 / 22
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
clinical setting was rather focused on effectiveness of single
risk message formats only, and iso-
lated from the context [13,17–19,21,22].
Overall it can be stated that in concordance with findings and
recommendations in the lit-
erature, participants used natural frequencies, absolute risk and
positive and negative framing
in their risk communication. Some clinicians also reported to
use percentages. This approach
is generally not highly recommended in the scientific literature
[6,10,21,22], however recent
findings suggest that natural frequencies do not foster better
understanding and thus pointing
58. to an equal performance of percentages and natural frequencies
[20,76].
In agreement with scientific recommendations, our participants
stated to prefer the presen-
tation of absolute risk since relative risk can be misleading in
risk perception [12,20]. Concern-
ing visual tools most clinicians were familiar with population
pictograms and applied them on
a regular basis. Overall, all interviewees agreed that a form of
visualization is important to sup-
port risk communication, as shown in previous research [28,77–
79]. A noteworthy fact is that
clinicians did not consistently specify the time frame around the
risk estimates. Concerning
the communication of numbers in words only, a small number of
clinicians reported that they
used this approach in some situations, although this is
contradictory to the recommendations
in the literature [19,20,41]. Clinicians reported that they dealt
with uncertainty in descriptive
verbal terms. Complex approaches such as confidence intervals
were not reported to be used.
However, in relation to serious life-threatening illnesses,
clinicians gave a range of life expec-
59. tancy to patients to prevent the negative effects of holding on to
a fixed time point.
Strengths and limitations
As far as we know no other study has given a comprehensive
insight into risk communication
strategies and narratives that clinicians report to apparently use
in practice, in the way that we
have done. We provide a comprehensive overview of a sample
of clinicians from the Nether-
lands and Germany. However, as we interviewed a convenience
sample of clinicians that are at
least familiar with the concept of SDM, these findings might not
be generalizable to clinical
practice in general, as other doctors might be less inclined to
use the presented risk communi-
cation strategies. Most of the interviews were conducted in the
mother tongue of the partici-
pant (Dutch or German) with the exception of six interviews
that were conducted in English.
Using the mother tongue of the interviewee facilitates the
elicitation of authentic narratives.
Nevertheless, a drawback might be that the interviewer has only
recently learned Dutch. How-
ever, discussing the data in the project team with Dutch
60. speaking team members, strengthened
the credibility and scientific quality. Another drawback is the
small sample size. The findings
need to be confirmed in a larger sample size. However, it needs
to be considered that qualita-
tive research aims to give a detailed explorative insight rather
than confirming specified
hypotheses in a representative sample. We are confident that the
results reflect adequately the
information provided by this sample of clinicians as recruitment
and data collection took
place until saturation of data was reached. Further, the
utilization of interviews to obtain the
risk communication strategies relied on the recall of the
clinicians. Observations of consulta-
tions would probably have resulted in additional information.
As observations were not feasi-
ble in our study, we believe that using participants’ self-
selected patient cases sufficiently
enhanced authentic reflections about their risk communication
process. In addition, this study
cannot make any inferences and statements about the effectivity
of the illustrated strategies.
Nonetheless, these findings could facilitate specific hypotheses
61. that could be tested in future
experimental and systematic studies. For reasons of feasibility
the patient perspective could
not be explored in this study.
PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 16 / 22
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
Conclusion
In conclusion, our study gives an insight into what shapes risk
communication and what
authentic risk communication strategies clinicians from
different medical disciplines report to
use in daily clinical practice. We illustrated the multi-
dimensional nature and complexity of
risk communication which is about more than conveying a risk
message in an adequate for-
mat. The risk communication process is inherently incorporated
in the interaction with the
unique clinical circumstances. Hence, we conclude that risk
communication cannot be taught
62. without taking the context and the clinicians’ expertise and
communication goals into
consideration.
Implication for further research and practice
Undoubtedly, research on effectiveness of certain risk
communication formats is important,
but risk communication should be viewed in relation to its
context. Further research should
address more practical approaches for a risk communication
framework in the clinical setting
to be able to better examine the topic. The challenge for future
research is to take the perspec-
tives of clinicians and patients into account and also the
contextual situation related to the dis-
ease and type of risk instead of merely focusing on a single
format. It could be of interest to
elucidate patient satisfaction concerning the described
strategies. Further research needs to
address the aspect of patient´s health literacy and risk
communication. The effectiveness of
using illustrative examples of risk communication should be
evaluated in a systematic way, as
they might be a good method of supporting risk communication
training for trainees. Given
63. the important role of context in risk communication, providing
clinicians with context-spe-
cific risk communication strategies seems important. Hence, the
identified strategies can be
used as a starting point for the development of medical
curricula that address teaching risk
communication in a more practical illustrative way, e.g.
centered in proactive workplace-
learning [44,80], where the expertise of experienced doctors is
taken into account. Addition-
ally, the provided risk communication strategies may be of
interest to other clinicians.
Supporting information
S1 Appendix. Semi-structured interview guide.
(PDF)
S2 Appendix. Patient cases that illustrate risk communication.
(PDF)
S3 Appendix. Tables risk communication strategies and
narratives.
(PDF)
S4 Appendix. AUDIT trail.
64. (PDF)
S5 Appendix. COREQ checklist.
(PDF)
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Albine Moser for the advice concerning
questions on the qualitative meth-
odology, Anke Steckelberg for the contribution to recruitment
process and Simona Dumi-
trescu and Simon Voß for the critical input on the manuscript
text and figure.
PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 17 / 22
http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchSingleRepresentation.action
?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751.s001
http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchSingleRepresentation.action
?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751.s002
http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchSingleRepresentation.action
?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751.s003
http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchSingleRepresentation.action
?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751.s004
http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchSingleRepresentation.action
?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751.s005
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
65. Author Contributions
Conceptualization: Romy Richter, Esther Giroldi, Jesse Jansen,
Trudy van der Weijden.
Data curation: Romy Richter, Trudy van der Weijden.
Formal analysis: Romy Richter, Esther Giroldi, Trudy van der
Weijden.
Investigation: Romy Richter.
Methodology: Romy Richter, Esther Giroldi, Trudy van der
Weijden.
Supervision: Trudy van der Weijden.
Visualization: Jesse Jansen.
Writing – original draft: Romy Richter.
Writing – review & editing: Romy Richter, Esther Giroldi, Jesse
Jansen, Trudy van der
Weijden.
References
1. Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making—The
pinnacle of patient-centered care. New
England Journal of Medicine. 2012 Mar 1; 366(9):780–1.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1109283
PMID: 22375967
2. Elwyn G, Durand MA, Song J, Aarts J, Barr PJ, Berger Z, et
66. al. A three-talk model for shared decision
making: Multistage consultation process. BMJ (Online). 2017;
359:j4891.
3. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd
A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision mak-
ing: a model for clinical practice. Journal Of General Internal
Medicine. 2012 Oct; 27(10):1361–7. Avail-
able from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22618581
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6
PMID: 22618581
4. Elwyn GJ, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R. Shared decision
making and the concept of equipoise: The
competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. British
Journal of General Practice. 2000; 50
(460):892–9. PMID: 11141876
5. Paling J. Strategies to help patients understand risk. British
Medical Journal. 2003; 327(7417):745–8.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7417.745 PMID: 14512489
6. Godolphin W. The role of risk communication in shared
decision making: first lets get to choices. British
Medical Journal. 2003; 327(7417):692–3.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7417.692 PMID: 14512449
7. Kirkegaard P, Edwards AGK, Hansen B, Hansen MD, Jensen
67. MSA, Lauritzen T, et al. The RISAP-
study: a complex intervention in risk communication and shared
decision-making in general practice.
Risk Communication in General Practice. BMC Fam Pract.
2010; 11:70. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-
2296-11-70 PMID: 20860820
8. Hoffmann TC, Légaré F, Simmons MB, McNamara K,
McCaffery K, Trevena LJ, et al. Shared decision
making: What do clinicians need to know and why should they
bother? Medical Journal of Australia.
2014 Jul 7; 201(1):35–9. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja14.00002
PMID: 24999896
9. Han PKJ, Joekes K, Elwyn G, Mazor KM, Thomson R,
Sedgwick P, et al. Development and evaluation
of a risk communication curriculum for medical students.
Patient Education and Counseling. 2014 Jan;
94(1):43–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.009 PMID:
24128795
10. Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W, Kurz-Milcke E, Schwartz LM,
Woloshin S. Helping doctors and patients
make sense of health statistics. Psychological Science in the
Public Interest. 2007 Nov; 8(2):53–96.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.x PMID:
26161749
68. 11. Gigerenzer G, Edwards A. Simple tools for understanding
risks: From innumeracy to insight. British
Medical Journal. 2003 Sep 27; 327(7417):741–4.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7417.741 PMID:
14512488
12. Ahmed H, Naik G, Willoughby H, Edwards AGK.
Communicating risk. BMJ [Internet]. 2012; 344:e3996.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e3996 PMID: 22709962
13. Lipkus IM. Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of
conveying health risks: Suggested best practices and
future recommendations. Medical Decision Making. 2007;
27(5):696–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/
0272989X07307271 PMID: 17873259
PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 18 / 22
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1109283
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22375967
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22618581
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22618581
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11141876
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7417.745
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14512489
70. 1002/14651858.CD006777.pub2 PMID: 22161408
16. Keller C, Siegrist M. Effect of risk communication formats
on risk perception depending on numeracy.
Medical Decision Making. 2009; 29(4):483–90.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X09333122 PMID:
19525484
17. Timmermans D, Molewijk B, Stiggelbout A, Kievit J.
Different formats for communicating surgical risks
to patients and the effect on choice of treatment. Patient
Education and Counseling. 2004 Sep; 54
(3):255–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00238-6
PMID: 15324976
18. Marteau TM, Saidi G, Goodburn S, Lawton J, Michie S,
Bobrow M. Numbers or words? A randomized
controlled trial of presenting screen negative results to pregnant
women. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2000; 20
(9):714–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-
0223(200009)20:9<714::aid-pd906>3.0.co;2-4 PMID:
11015699
19. Berry DC, Raynor DK, Knapp P. Communicating risk of
medication side effects: An empirical evaluation
of EU recommended terminology. Psychology, Health and
Medicine. 2010 Aug; 8(3):251–63.
71. 20. Lühnen J, Albrecht M, Mühlhauser I, Steckelberg A.
Leitlinie evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsinformation.
Hamburg; 2017.
21. Bodemer N, Meder B, Gigerenzer G. Communicating
relative risk changes with baseline risk: Presenta-
tion format and numeracy matter. Medical Decision Making.
2014; 34(5):615–26. https://doi.org/10.
1177/0272989X14526305 PMID: 24803429
22. Gigerenzer G, Galesic M. Why do single event probabilities
confuse patients? Statements of frequency
are better for communicating risk. BMJ (Online). 2012;
344(7839):11–3.
23. Petrova D, Kostopoulou O, Delaney BC, Cokely ET, Garcia-
Retamero R. Strengths and Gaps in Physi-
cians’ Risk Communication: A Scenario Study of the Influence
of Numeracy on Cancer Screening Com-
munication. Medical Decision Making. 2018 Apr 1; 38(3):355–
65. https://doi.org/10.1177/
0272989X17729359 PMID: 28884617
24. Koo K, Brackett CD, Eisenberg EH, Kieffer KA, Hyams ES.
Impact of numeracy on understanding of
prostate cancer risk reduction in PSA screening. PLoS ONE.
2017 Dec 1; 12(12):e0190357. https://doi.
72. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190357 PMID: 29284055
25. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Mulley A. Explaining risks: turning
numerical data into meaningful pictures. BMJ.
2002 Apr 6; 324(7341):827–30.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7341.827 PMID: 11934777
26. Neuner-Jehle S, Knecht MI, Stey-Steurer C, Senn O.
Acceptance and practicability of a visual commu-
nication tool in smoking cessation counselling: A randomised
controlled trial. Primary Care Respiratory
Journal. 2013 Dec; 22(4):412–6.
https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00086 PMID: 24105269
27. Goodyear-Smith F, Arroll B, Chan L, Jackson R, Wells S,
Kenealy T. Patients prefer pictures to num-
bers to express cardiovascular benefit from treatment. Annals of
Family Medicine. 2008 May; 6(3):213–
7. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.795 PMID: 18474883
28. Garcia-Retamero R, Cokely ET. Communicating Health
Risks With Visual Aids. Current Directions in
Psychological Science. 2013 Oct 25; 22(5):392–9.
29. Caverly T, Fagerlin A, Larkin K, Zikmund-Fischer B. What
is the best way to communicate the benefits
and harms of lung cancer screening? Journal of General Internal
Medicine. 2016; 31(2 SUPPL. 1):
73. S471–2.
30. Hess R, Visschers VHM, Siegrist M. Risk communication
with pictographs: The role of numeracy and
graph processing. Judgment and Decision Making. 2011;
6(3):263–74.
31. Schapira MM, Nattinger AB, McHorney CA. Frequency or
probability? A qualitative study of risk com-
munication formats used in health care. Medical Decision
Making. 2001; 21(6):459–67. https://doi.org/
10.1177/0272989X0102100604 PMID: 11760103
32. Bonner C, McKinn S, Lau A, Jansen J, Doust J, Trevena L,
et al. Heuristics and biases in cardiovascular
disease prevention: How can we improve communication about
risk, benefits and harms? Patient Edu-
cation and Counseling. 2018 May 1; 101(5):843–53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.12.003 PMID:
29269097
33. Edwards A, Elwyn G. Understanding risk and lessons for
clinical risk communication about treatment
preferences. Quality in Health Care. 2001 Sep; 10(Suppl 1):i9–
13.
34. Polak L. Communicating risk to patients and the public.
British Journal of General Practice. 2012; 62
74. (598):240.
PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 19 / 22
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.014
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20471766
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006777.pub2
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006777.pub2
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22161408
https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X09333122
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19525484
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991%2803%2900238-6
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15324976
https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-
0223%28200009%2920%3A9%26lt%3B714%3A%3Aaid-
pd906%26gt%3B3.0.co%3B2-4
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11015699
https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X14526305
https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X14526305
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24803429
https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X17729359
https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X17729359
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28884617
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190357
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190357
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284055
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7341.827
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11934777
https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00086
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24105269
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.795
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18474883
76. tions. Medical Decision Making. 2007 Sep; 27(5):681–95.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X07307270
PMID: 17873256
39. Brun W, Keren G, Kirkebøen G, Montgomery H.
Perspectives on thinking, judging, and decisions mak-
ing: A tribute to Karl Halvor Teigen. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
2011 [cited 2020 Jan 15]. Available
from:
https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/perspectiv
es-on-thinking-judging-and-
decisions-making-a-tribute-t
40. Bhise V, Rajan SS, Sittig DF, Morgan RO, Chaudhary P,
Singh H. Defining and Measuring Diagnostic
Uncertainty in Medicine: A Systematic Review. Journal of
General Internal Medicine. 2018 Jan 1; 33
(1):103–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4164-1 PMID:
28936618
41. Mühlhauser I, Albrecht M, Steckelberg A. Evidence-based
health information and risk competence.
GMS German Medical Science. 2015; 13:1612–3174.
42. Gigerenzer G. What are natural frequencies? BMJ. 2011 Oct
17; 343:d6386. Available from: http://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22006953
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6386 PMID: 22006953
77. 43. Dixon SD, Konheim-Kalkstein YL. Risk communication: A
complex process. In: LeRoy BS, Veach PM,
Bartels DM, editors. Genetic counseling practice: Advanced
concepts and skills. Wiley-Blackwell;
2010. p. 65–94.
44. Giroldi E, Veldhuijzen W, Geelen K, Muris J, Bareman F,
Bueving H, et al. Developing skilled doctor–
patient communication in the workplace: a qualitative study of
the experiences of trainees and clinical
supervisors. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2017 Dec
1; 22(5):1263–78. https://doi.org/10.
1007/s10459-017-9765-2 PMID: 28220333
45. van den Eertwegh V, van Dalen J, van Dulmen S, van der
Vleuten C, Scherpbier A. Residents’ per-
ceived barriers to communication skills learning: Comparing
two medical working contexts in postgradu-
ate training. Patient Education and Counseling. 2014; 95(1):91–
7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.
01.002 PMID: 24468200
46. Hodges BD, Lingard L. The Question of Competence:
Reconsidering Medical Education in the Twenty-
First Century. Cornell University Press, ILR Press. 2012. 240.
78. 47. Swanwick Tim. Understanding Medical Education:
Evidence, Theory, and Practice. West Sussex:
Wiley-Blackwell; 2013.
48. Bradshaw C, Atkinson S, Doody O. Employing a Qualitative
Description Approach in Health Care
Research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research. 2017 Dec 24;
4:233339361774228.
49. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for
reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-
item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual
Health Care. 2007; 19:349–57. https://doi.org/
10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 PMID: 17872937
50. Ahl AS, Acree JA, Gipson PS, Mcdowell RM, Miller L,
Mcelvaine MD. Standardization of nomenclature
for animal health risk analysis. Rev. Sci. Tech. 1993 Dec;
12(4):1045–53. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.
12.4.744 PMID: 8312610
51. Lambert V, Lambert C. Qualitative Descriptive Research:
An Acceptable Design. Pacific Rim Interna-
tional Journal of Nursing Research. 2012; 16(4):255–6.
52. Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: Practical guidance to
qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collec-
tion and analysis. European Journal of General Practice. 2018
79. Dec; 24(1):9–18. https://doi.org/10.
1080/13814788.2017.1375091 PMID: 29199486
53. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process.
Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008 Apr; 62
(1):107–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
PMID: 18352969
54. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park,
CA: Sage Publications; 1985. 416.
55. Koelsch LE. Reconceptualizing the Member Check
Interview. International Journal of Qualitative Meth-
ods. 2013 Feb 1; 12(1):168–79.
56. Bradshaw C, Atkinson S, Doody O. Employing a Qualitative
Description Approach in Health Care
Research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research. 2017 Nov 21;
4.
PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 20 / 22
https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x11393976
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22067431
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.024
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28324792
https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558712459361
https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558712459361
81. publishing. European Journal of General Practice. 2018 Jan 5;
24(1):120–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/
13814788.2017.1375092 PMID: 29202616
58. Frambach JM, van der Vleuten CPM, Durning S. AM Last
Page: Quality Criteria in Qualitative and
Quantitative Research. Academic Medicine. 2013 May;
88(4):552. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.
0b013e31828abf7f PMID: 23531762
59. Schwartz S. Heuristics and Biases in Medical Judgment and
Decision Making. In: Heath L. et al. (eds)
Applications of Heuristics and Biases to Social Issues. Social
Psychological Applications to Social
Issues (Published under the auspices of the Society for the
Psychological Study of Social Issues), vol
3. Boston: Springer; 1994. pp. 45–72.
60. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty:
Heuristics and biases. Science. 1974; 185
(4157):1124–31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
PMID: 17835457
61. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Availability: A Heuristic for
Judging Frequency and Probability122. Cognitive
Psychology. 1973; 5:207–32.
62. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar,
82. Straus and Giroux; 2011.
63. Shah AK, Oppenheimer DM. Heuristics Made Easy: An
Effort-Reduction Framework. Psychological
Bulletin. 2008 Mar; 134(2):207–22.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.207 PMID: 18298269
64. van Wagner V. Risk talk: Using evidence without increasing
fear. Midwifery. 2016; 38:21–8. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.04.009 PMID: 27174012
65. Barilli E, Savadori L, Pighin S, Bonalumi S, Ferrari A,
Ferrari M, et al. From chance to choice: The use of
a verbal analogy in the communication of risk. Health, Risk &
Society. 2010 Dec 2; 12(6):546–59.
66. Edwards A. Communicating risks through analogies. BMJ.
2003 Sep; 327(7417):749. https://doi.org/
10.1136/bmj.327.7417.749 PMID: 14512490
67. Essers G, Kramer A, Andriesse B, van Weel C, van der
Vleuten C, van Dulmen S. Context factors in
general practitioner—Patient encounters and their impact on
assessing communication skills—An
exploratory study. BMC Family Practice. 2013; 14.
68. Essers G, van Dulmen S, van Weel C, van der Vleuten C,
Kramer A. Identifying context factors explain-
ing physician’s low performance in communication assessment:
83. An explorative study in general prac-
tice. BMC Family Practice. 2011; 12:1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-12-1
69. Salmon P, Young B. Creativity in clinical communication:
From communication skills to skilled commu-
nication. Medical Education. 2011 Mar; 45(3):217–26.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03801.
x PMID: 21299597
70. Veldhuijzen W. Challenging the patient-centred paradigm:
Designing feasible guidelines for doctor–
patient communication. Maastricht: Maastricht University.
2011.
71. Veldhuijzen W, Mogendorff K, Ram P, van der Weijden T,
Elwyn G, van der Vleuten C. How doctors
move from generic goals to specific communicative behavior in
real practice consultations. Patient Edu-
cation and Counseling. 2013 Feb; 90(2):170–6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.10.005 PMID:
23218241
72. Eppler MJ, Aeschimann M. A systematic framework for risk
visualization in risk management and com-
munication. Risk Management. 2009 Apr; 11(2):67–89.
73. Reynolds B, Quinn SC. Effective Communication During an
84. Influenza Pandemic: The Value of Using a
Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication Framework. Health
Promotion Practice. 2008; 9((4
Suppl)):13S–17S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839908325267
PMID: 18936255
74. Covello VT. Best Practices in Public Health Risk and Crisis
Communication. Journal of Health Commu-
nication. 2003; 8(sup1):5–8.
75. Reynolds BJ, Seeger MW. Crisis and Emergency Risk
Communication as an Integrative Model. Journal
of Health Communication. 2005 Feb 23; 10:43–55.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730590904571 PMID:
15764443
76. Pighin S, Gonzalez M, Savadori L, Girotto V. Natural
Frequencies Do Not Foster Public Understanding
of Medical Test Results. Medical Decision Making. 2016 Aug
31; 36(6):686–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/
0272989X16640785 PMID: 27034447
77. Lipkus IM. Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of
conveying health risks: Suggested best practices and
future recommendations. Medical Decision Making. 2007 Sep;
27(5):696–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/
0272989X07307271 PMID: 17873259
85. 78. Garcia-Retamero R, Cokely ET. Designing Visual AIDS
That Promote Risk Literacy: A Systematic
Review of Health Research and Evidence-Based Design
Heuristics. Human Factors. 2017; 59(4):582–
627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720817690634 PMID:
28192674
PLOS ONE Clinicians’ risk communication strategies in daily
clinical practice
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
August 13, 2020 21 / 22
https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29202616
https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828abf7f
https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828abf7f
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23531762
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17835457
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.207
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18298269
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.04.009
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.04.009
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27174012
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7417.749
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7417.749
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14512490
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-12-1
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03801.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03801.x
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21299597
87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1203475417715208
https://doi.org/10.1177/1203475417715208
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28614954
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236751
PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE
P U B L I C H E A L T H R E S E A R C H , P R A C T I C E
, A N D P O L I C Y
Volume 17, E158
DECEMBER 2020
IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION
Emergency Preparedness and Risk Communication
Among African American Churches: Leveraging a
Community-Based Participatory Research
Partnership COVID-19 Initiative
LaPrincess C. Brewer, MD, MPH1,2; Gladys B. Asiedu, PhD3;
Clarence Jones, MEd4; Monisha Richard5;
Jamia Erickson6; Jennifer Weis, MHS2,7;
Adeline Abbenyi, MS2,7; Tabetha A. Brockman, MA2,7;
Irene G. Sia, MD, MSc2,7,8; Mark L. Wieland, MD, MPH2,9;
Richard O. White, MD, MSc2,10;
Chyke A. Doubeni, MD, MPH2,7,11
88. Accessible Version: www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2020/20_0408.htm
Suggested citation for this article: Brewer LC, Asiedu GB,
Jones C, Richard M, Erickson J, Weis J, et al. Emergency
Preparedness and Risk Communication Among African
American
Churches: Leveraging a Community-Based Participatory
Research
Partnership COVID-19 Initiative. Prev Chronic Dis 2020;
17:200408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd17.200408.
PEER REVIEWED
Summary
What is already known on this topic?
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has
disproportion-
ately affected African American communities with high
infection and mor-
tality rates; these high rates result from pre-existing chronic
disease dis-
parities and structural inequities.
What is added by this report?
A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention framework guided
the imple-
mentation and evaluation of a COVID-19 emergency
preparedness and
risk communication strategy within an established community-
based parti-
cipatory research partnership with African American churches.
89. What are the implications for public health practice?
Leveraging existing infrastructure from academic–community
partner-
ships can facilitate rapid dissemination of accurate COVID-19
health in-
formation and critical resources to address COVID-19–related
inequities.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis has dispropor-
tionately affected the African American population. To mitigate
the disparities, we deployed an emergency preparedness strategy
within an existing community-based participatory research (CB-
PR) partnership among African American churches to dissemin-
ate accurate COVID-19 information. We used the Centers for
Dis-
ease Control and Prevention Crisis and Emergency Risk
Commu-
nication framework to conduct a needs assessment, distribute
emergency preparedness manuals, and deliver COVID-19–
related
messaging among African American churches via electronic
com-
munication platforms. A needs assessment showed that the top 3
church emergency resource needs were financial support, food
and
utilities, and COVID-19 health information. During an 8-week
period (April 3–May 31, 2020), we equipped 120 churches with
emergency preparedness manuals and delivered 230 messages
via
social media (Facebook) and email. For reach, we estimated that
6,539 unique persons viewed content on the Facebook page, and
for engagement, we found 1,260 interactions (eg, likes, loves,
comments, shares, video views, post clicks). Emails from com-
90. munity communication leaders reached an estimated 12,000
church members. CBPR partnerships can be effectively
leveraged
to promote emergency preparedness and communicate risk
among
under-resourced communities during a pandemic.
Introduction
Partnerships with faith-based organizations are pivotal in
rapidly
engaging with racial/ethnic minority populations, who are often
socially and economically marginalized and medically under-
served, to address public health crises. Engagement with leaders
of
faith-based organizations on infectious disease prevention
initiat-
ives led to successes during the Ebola outbreak in West Africa
and
increases in influenza immunization rates during the H1N1 pan-
demic (1,2). African American communities have experienced
dis-
proportionately high novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-
19)
The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal
do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department
of Health
and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated
institutions.
This publication is in the public domain and is therefore
without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted
freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2020/20_0408.htm • Centers for
91. Disease Control and Prevention 1
infection and mortality rates, which have resulted from pre-
existing chronic disease disparities and structural inequities (3–
5).
African American adults (27%) are more likely than Hispanic
adults (13%) or White adults (13%) to personally know
someone
who has been hospitalized for or died of COVID-19 (6). Thus,
community-engaged efforts are needed to mitigate the effect of
COVID-19 among the African American population. From its
in-
ception, the Black church has consistently served as a resilient
source to mobilize community members for capacity building to
reach groups that have been marginalized and oppressed at the
most troubling of times — especially in the areas of health and
so-
cial injustice (7–9).
The FAITH! (Fostering African-American Improvement in Total
Health) program is the first academic–community partnership
between Mayo Clinic and local African American churches. It
forged an authentic, community-based participatory research
(CB-
PR) initiative to diminish chronic disease health disparities,
partic-
ularly cardiovascular disease, in disproportionately affected
Afric-
an American communities (10). Since its founding in 2013 in
Min-
nesota, FAITH! and its community partners have disseminated
trusted health information and conducted research that has im-
proved the health of local African American communities.
Through community engagement and a social contextual frame-