Research Plan
                  Alex T, Alex D, Alison, Amanda, Erica




Approach   Who?   There are many different user groups on Northeastern’s campus, and we
                  want to make sure we get a diverse sample. That said, we classified two main
                  user groups of pedestrians based on the amount of time people spend on
                  campus – frequent users and intermittent users. In each of those two groups,
                  we identified multiple parties to target. In addition, we identified a “special
                  interests” category which takes in to account mode of transportation and
                  impairments.

                  Frequent                                  Intermittent
                  Current students                          Alumni
                  Faculty                                   Parents
                  Staff                                     Perspective students
                  Local community (high use)                Student athletes (from other schools)
                  Maintenance/grounds staff                 Conference/Event attendees
                                                            Friends of current students
                  Special Interests                         Passers-by
                                                            MBTA traffic
                  Handicapped                               Local community (low use)
                    wheelchair                              Construction/maintenance workers
                    crutches
                    visually impaired
                  Cyclists
                  Motorists

                  Our research methods will be centric to these three groups and we want to
                  make sure we get an accurate representation of each by selecting participants
                  as equally distributed as possible between sub categories.




           How?   Note:
                  It’ll be paramount in all of the subsequent steps to make sure we’re engaging
                  different user groups, people that are using different parts of campus and
                  approaching it from different places.

                  1. Identify patterns
                  The first step is finding out where the different groups go. We’ll provide
                  campus maps to people from the different categories and have them trace on
                  the map their travel patterns. From this, we’ll be able to tell what places we
                  should target.
How? (cont’d)   2. Pretend we’re lost.
                               We’ll be on campus (and other campuses as well – other colleges or other
                               types of campuses like medical complexes) and ask the different groups of
                               users to give us directions to a specific place. While doing this, we’ll make
                               observations as to their familiarity with campus, the ease and clarity with
                               which they can give directions, any frustrations that they have and any
                               unusual or unique notes they many have (such as shortcuts or “secret”
                               entrances.) These interactions may be video taped or audio may be recorded
                               (perhaps secretly).

                               3. Document people’s interactions.
                               We’ll use photography and/or video to track the experiences that different
                               users groups have while interacting with their environment. We’ll get partici-
                               pants to guide us to different destinations and observe how they get there.
                               Some of the participants will be familiar with campus already, some will be
                               only “acquainted” with campus, and others will never have walked through it.
                               We’ll do this at Northeastern and other campuses as well.



                      What?    We expect a large variance between user groups and we want to document
                               their interactions. We suspect that some other campuses may do some things
                               well and observing interactions with other systems may shed some light on
                               how we can approve our own. We think that our observations will highlight
                               things that need to change, things that make sense to one group and not
                               another and things that may be working already. All of these observations will
                               move us closer to understanding what purpose a new wayfinding system will
                               need to serve.




Deliverables          What?    1. Interaction map(s)
                               These will illustrate different routes accompanied by photographs and insights
                               that are representative of a trend or of trouble spots.

                               2. Interactive experience
                               Video, audio and photo montage that represents the experience of getting
                               around campus from the view of different users.
Schedule         Feb 2-5   Gather maps




Field research        9    Due:                                    In Class:
(#2, 3 from                misc. research including maps and       Figure out plan for who will capture
above)                     interviews that will dictate who and    exactly what experiences. Divide
                           where we should focus our efforts.      up on campus work and on other
                                                                   campus work.

                     12    Check in:                               In Class:
                           what progress has been made with        discuss what we’ve already
                           experience gathering?                   captured, see if there are any
                                                                   problems with the method, adjust
                                                                   method if the data collection is not
                                                                   working.

                     16    Check in:                               In Class:
                           should have all data by now             compile and review data, everyone
                                                                   should think of their own narrative
                                                                   for next class.


Work on              19    Check in:                               In Class:
producing                  review everybody’s narrative for the    decide which narrative, or elements
deliverables               data                                    of the narratives we want to work
                                                                   wirth in each piece (photo map and
                                                                   interactive), split up work

                     23    Check in:                               In Class:
                           what progress has been made on          review current progress as whole
                           work?                                   group, decide if any changes need
                                                                   to be made, continue work.

                     26    all work complete – present in class.

Research Plan: Act

  • 1.
    Research Plan Alex T, Alex D, Alison, Amanda, Erica Approach Who? There are many different user groups on Northeastern’s campus, and we want to make sure we get a diverse sample. That said, we classified two main user groups of pedestrians based on the amount of time people spend on campus – frequent users and intermittent users. In each of those two groups, we identified multiple parties to target. In addition, we identified a “special interests” category which takes in to account mode of transportation and impairments. Frequent Intermittent Current students Alumni Faculty Parents Staff Perspective students Local community (high use) Student athletes (from other schools) Maintenance/grounds staff Conference/Event attendees Friends of current students Special Interests Passers-by MBTA traffic Handicapped Local community (low use) wheelchair Construction/maintenance workers crutches visually impaired Cyclists Motorists Our research methods will be centric to these three groups and we want to make sure we get an accurate representation of each by selecting participants as equally distributed as possible between sub categories. How? Note: It’ll be paramount in all of the subsequent steps to make sure we’re engaging different user groups, people that are using different parts of campus and approaching it from different places. 1. Identify patterns The first step is finding out where the different groups go. We’ll provide campus maps to people from the different categories and have them trace on the map their travel patterns. From this, we’ll be able to tell what places we should target.
  • 2.
    How? (cont’d) 2. Pretend we’re lost. We’ll be on campus (and other campuses as well – other colleges or other types of campuses like medical complexes) and ask the different groups of users to give us directions to a specific place. While doing this, we’ll make observations as to their familiarity with campus, the ease and clarity with which they can give directions, any frustrations that they have and any unusual or unique notes they many have (such as shortcuts or “secret” entrances.) These interactions may be video taped or audio may be recorded (perhaps secretly). 3. Document people’s interactions. We’ll use photography and/or video to track the experiences that different users groups have while interacting with their environment. We’ll get partici- pants to guide us to different destinations and observe how they get there. Some of the participants will be familiar with campus already, some will be only “acquainted” with campus, and others will never have walked through it. We’ll do this at Northeastern and other campuses as well. What? We expect a large variance between user groups and we want to document their interactions. We suspect that some other campuses may do some things well and observing interactions with other systems may shed some light on how we can approve our own. We think that our observations will highlight things that need to change, things that make sense to one group and not another and things that may be working already. All of these observations will move us closer to understanding what purpose a new wayfinding system will need to serve. Deliverables What? 1. Interaction map(s) These will illustrate different routes accompanied by photographs and insights that are representative of a trend or of trouble spots. 2. Interactive experience Video, audio and photo montage that represents the experience of getting around campus from the view of different users.
  • 3.
    Schedule Feb 2-5 Gather maps Field research 9 Due: In Class: (#2, 3 from misc. research including maps and Figure out plan for who will capture above) interviews that will dictate who and exactly what experiences. Divide where we should focus our efforts. up on campus work and on other campus work. 12 Check in: In Class: what progress has been made with discuss what we’ve already experience gathering? captured, see if there are any problems with the method, adjust method if the data collection is not working. 16 Check in: In Class: should have all data by now compile and review data, everyone should think of their own narrative for next class. Work on 19 Check in: In Class: producing review everybody’s narrative for the decide which narrative, or elements deliverables data of the narratives we want to work wirth in each piece (photo map and interactive), split up work 23 Check in: In Class: what progress has been made on review current progress as whole work? group, decide if any changes need to be made, continue work. 26 all work complete – present in class.