The document discusses ethics in medical research. It covers several key topics, including the principles of research ethics such as respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. It also discusses informed consent, guidelines for ethical research, and oversight by ethics committees. Special protections are needed for vulnerable groups participating in research. Overall, the document aims to outline important concepts in research ethics and their role in ensuring ethical and responsible medical research.
This document provides guidelines for ethical research conduct. It discusses the importance of ethics in research and defines key terms like ethics, citations, and plagiarism. The document outlines general ethical principles like honesty, objectivity, and social responsibility. It also discusses topics like informed consent and protecting human subjects. Guidelines are provided for using sources, quoting, paraphrasing and summarizing. Common ethical violations like fabrication, falsification and plagiarism are explained. Tips for succeeding in research and avoiding ethical dilemmas are also presented.
Presentation "Challenges in research ethics" by Milica Ševkušić, Re@WBC ERASMUS + Project, Training for trainers, April 5–7, 2017, University of Belgrade
Research Ethics from an IRB Perspective - Presented by Dr. Heidi Sato & Dr. Stefan Hanson
Understanding the IRB requirements before initiating a research study may be a challenging task. Learn about research ethics from an IRB perspective. In this webinar you will learn:
· What is an IRB and its purpose?
· What requires IRB review and approval?
· What are the different types of IRB review?
· What is the process for submitting an IRB application?
· What criteria must be met for IRB approval?
· What are possible outcomes of an IRB review?
About CORE:
The Culture of Research and Education (C.O.R.E.) webinar series is spearheaded by Dr. Bernice B. Rumala, CORE Chair & Program Director of the Ph.D. in Health Sciences program in collaboration with leaders and faculty across all academic programs.
This innovative and wide-ranging series is designed to provide continuing education, skills-building techniques, and tools for academic and professional development. These sessions will provide a unique chance to build your professional development toolkit through presentations, discussions, and workshops with Trident’s world-class faculty.
For further information about CORE or to present, you may contact Dr. Bernice B. Rumala at Bernice.rumala@trident.edu
This document provides an agenda for a workshop on research skills and ethics. It begins with an introduction and dedication to the late Dr. Ahmed Zewail, then discusses the differences between scientists and researchers. The second part introduces the Scientific Research Group in Egypt, its members and activities. The third part covers important research skills like reading, referencing, and using social media. The fourth part defines research misconduct behaviors. The fifth part discusses authorship issues and the sixth presents the Committee on Publication Ethics. The document provides guidance on responsible research practices.
This document discusses several topics related to research ethics including guidelines, codes, and organizations. It provides 10 guidelines for ethical research including honesty, objectivity, integrity, and social responsibility. It summarizes the Nuremberg Code which consists of 10 principles for ethical human experimentation such as voluntary consent and avoiding unnecessary suffering. It also discusses the Belmont Report which established three ethical principles for research involving human subjects: beneficence, justice, and respect for persons. It provides an overview of the roles of WHO, UNESCO, and UNESCO in establishing standards and guidance for ethical research practices globally. It identifies several types of research misconduct and issues that can arise from collaboration, peer review, and conflicts of interest. It
The document provides an overview of scientific research ethics. It discusses the importance of obtaining informed consent when using human subjects in research and obtaining appropriate oversight from institutional review boards. The document reviews some historical cases that lacked ethics, leading to the greater regulation of human subject research today. It also discusses the ethics of animal research and emphasizes replacing, reducing, and refining animal studies. The document outlines the responsibilities of researchers and students to conduct ethical work and avoid plagiarism.
The document discusses ethics in research and provides several examples of ethical issues and misconduct:
- It defines ethics and research, and explains why adhering to ethical norms in research is important. It discusses common ethical principles and codes/policies for research ethics.
- It presents four cases involving ethical dilemmas in research and discusses appropriate responses. It also provides examples of deviations from acceptable research practices, such as fabricating or falsifying data.
- Specifically, it discusses high-profile cases of scientific misconduct like Dr. John Darsee who fabricated research data and Dr. Robert Slutsky who included non-contributing authors. It emphasizes that the most serious crimes in research are fabrication, falsification, and plagiar
This document discusses research ethics and identifies important ethical considerations at different stages of research. It highlights the Tuskegee Syphilis Study as an example of unethical experimentation. Key principles of research ethics include beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and informed consent. Researchers should anticipate ethical issues related to their research problem, question, design, data collection, analysis, and dissemination. They are advised to obtain ethics approval and consult their institutional review board if they have any doubts.
This document provides guidelines for ethical research conduct. It discusses the importance of ethics in research and defines key terms like ethics, citations, and plagiarism. The document outlines general ethical principles like honesty, objectivity, and social responsibility. It also discusses topics like informed consent and protecting human subjects. Guidelines are provided for using sources, quoting, paraphrasing and summarizing. Common ethical violations like fabrication, falsification and plagiarism are explained. Tips for succeeding in research and avoiding ethical dilemmas are also presented.
Presentation "Challenges in research ethics" by Milica Ševkušić, Re@WBC ERASMUS + Project, Training for trainers, April 5–7, 2017, University of Belgrade
Research Ethics from an IRB Perspective - Presented by Dr. Heidi Sato & Dr. Stefan Hanson
Understanding the IRB requirements before initiating a research study may be a challenging task. Learn about research ethics from an IRB perspective. In this webinar you will learn:
· What is an IRB and its purpose?
· What requires IRB review and approval?
· What are the different types of IRB review?
· What is the process for submitting an IRB application?
· What criteria must be met for IRB approval?
· What are possible outcomes of an IRB review?
About CORE:
The Culture of Research and Education (C.O.R.E.) webinar series is spearheaded by Dr. Bernice B. Rumala, CORE Chair & Program Director of the Ph.D. in Health Sciences program in collaboration with leaders and faculty across all academic programs.
This innovative and wide-ranging series is designed to provide continuing education, skills-building techniques, and tools for academic and professional development. These sessions will provide a unique chance to build your professional development toolkit through presentations, discussions, and workshops with Trident’s world-class faculty.
For further information about CORE or to present, you may contact Dr. Bernice B. Rumala at Bernice.rumala@trident.edu
This document provides an agenda for a workshop on research skills and ethics. It begins with an introduction and dedication to the late Dr. Ahmed Zewail, then discusses the differences between scientists and researchers. The second part introduces the Scientific Research Group in Egypt, its members and activities. The third part covers important research skills like reading, referencing, and using social media. The fourth part defines research misconduct behaviors. The fifth part discusses authorship issues and the sixth presents the Committee on Publication Ethics. The document provides guidance on responsible research practices.
This document discusses several topics related to research ethics including guidelines, codes, and organizations. It provides 10 guidelines for ethical research including honesty, objectivity, integrity, and social responsibility. It summarizes the Nuremberg Code which consists of 10 principles for ethical human experimentation such as voluntary consent and avoiding unnecessary suffering. It also discusses the Belmont Report which established three ethical principles for research involving human subjects: beneficence, justice, and respect for persons. It provides an overview of the roles of WHO, UNESCO, and UNESCO in establishing standards and guidance for ethical research practices globally. It identifies several types of research misconduct and issues that can arise from collaboration, peer review, and conflicts of interest. It
The document provides an overview of scientific research ethics. It discusses the importance of obtaining informed consent when using human subjects in research and obtaining appropriate oversight from institutional review boards. The document reviews some historical cases that lacked ethics, leading to the greater regulation of human subject research today. It also discusses the ethics of animal research and emphasizes replacing, reducing, and refining animal studies. The document outlines the responsibilities of researchers and students to conduct ethical work and avoid plagiarism.
The document discusses ethics in research and provides several examples of ethical issues and misconduct:
- It defines ethics and research, and explains why adhering to ethical norms in research is important. It discusses common ethical principles and codes/policies for research ethics.
- It presents four cases involving ethical dilemmas in research and discusses appropriate responses. It also provides examples of deviations from acceptable research practices, such as fabricating or falsifying data.
- Specifically, it discusses high-profile cases of scientific misconduct like Dr. John Darsee who fabricated research data and Dr. Robert Slutsky who included non-contributing authors. It emphasizes that the most serious crimes in research are fabrication, falsification, and plagiar
This document discusses research ethics and identifies important ethical considerations at different stages of research. It highlights the Tuskegee Syphilis Study as an example of unethical experimentation. Key principles of research ethics include beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and informed consent. Researchers should anticipate ethical issues related to their research problem, question, design, data collection, analysis, and dissemination. They are advised to obtain ethics approval and consult their institutional review board if they have any doubts.
أخلاقيات البحث العلمي - Research Ethics FahadAlQabba
The document discusses ethics in medical research. It covers principles of research ethics including respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Special protections are needed for vulnerable groups participating in research. Researchers have responsibilities like protecting participants, obtaining informed consent, and ensuring scientific integrity. Misconduct in research like fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism undermine scientific validity and violate ethics. Proper documentation and attribution of other's work is important.
This document discusses research ethics and publishing scientific papers. It begins with Islamic quotes emphasizing good character and ethics. It then discusses types of research study designs and their hierarchy of evidence. The document provides guidance on choosing the right journal to publish in, what editors look for in manuscripts, and tips for attracting editors and readers. It also discusses the journal publishing process and peer review. Finally, it discusses the important topic of research ethics, defining key terms and principles such as informed consent, and the roles and responsibilities of research ethics committees.
The document discusses several key principles of ethical research:
1) Researchers must protect study participants from harm and obtain voluntary informed consent from participants.
2) Researchers should collect data anonymously or keep information confidential to protect participants' privacy.
3) Research proposals should undergo review by an Institutional Review Board to evaluate ethics.
4) Accurate reporting of research findings is important to maintain integrity.
This document provides an introduction to research integrity, also known as responsible conduct of research or research ethics. It outlines some of the main areas of focus, including research misconduct, collaboration issues, peer review, conflicts of interest, and human/animal subject research. The document discusses how research ethics is not just about intentionally bad acts, but also imperfect or questionable practices that may seem justified. It provides examples of issues that have arisen in areas like authorship, data sharing and ownership, and socially acceptable practices that are now deemed unethical. Overall, the document provides an overview of the moral foundations and key considerations of research integrity.
This document discusses ethical considerations in research. It defines ethics as rules that guide moral behavior and research principles. Ethics in research provides rules for appropriate and inappropriate research conduct and application of findings. The document outlines three main components of ethics in research: truthfulness, courtesy, and respect for human rights. It provides examples of each component, such as obtaining permission before collecting data, avoiding fraud/misconduct, and protecting participants' confidentiality, dignity, and right to withdraw. The overall summary is that the document defines ethics and its role in research, then outlines and gives examples of three key ethical components to consider which are truthfulness, courtesy, and respect for human rights.
Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Part 1 of the series of lectures I gave for the PEER (Professionalism and Ethics Education for Residents) Project sponsored and organized by the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCHS).
This document discusses ethical principles in social research. It covers historical examples where ethics were not followed, such as the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and research done by Nazi Germany. Key principles discussed include obtaining informed consent, protecting participants from harm, ensuring anonymity and confidentiality, and being honest in reporting results. The document also addresses ethical dilemmas that can arise during and after data collection regarding issues like who owns the data. Researchers must consider all stakeholders and try to maximize benefits and minimize risks of any study.
This document discusses research ethics and academic honesty. It begins by defining key terms related to research integrity and misconduct. The outline then discusses concepts of ethics, good and ethical research practices, ethical theories, data collection and presentation standards, authorship guidelines, and the process of obtaining funding. The document emphasizes principles of research ethics like autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, confidentiality, and integrity. It also defines and discusses research misconduct, including fabrication, falsification and plagiarism.
Scientific integrity and avoiding misconduct are important issues discussed by governments, universities, and the scientific community. Upholding high ethical standards in research helps ensure reliable results and safety. Some examples of misconduct include falsifying or fabricating data, plagiarism, and failing to maintain confidentiality. Consequences for misconduct can be severe, such as job termination, fines, and bans from research. Maintaining integrity through practices like careful record keeping, peer review, and consulting advisors protects scientists and the legitimacy of their work.
The document discusses ethical guidelines for researchers based on the American Sociological Association's code of ethics. It outlines the ASA's five general principles of professional competence, integrity, professional and scientific responsibility, respect for people's rights and diversity, and social responsibility. It also discusses general ethical issues researchers must consider, such as avoiding harm, obtaining informed consent, respecting privacy, avoiding conflicts of interest, and ethical reporting. The document provides examples of techniques to avoid harm like debriefing and case studies of plagiarism issues in Pakistani universities.
This document discusses ethics in research. It defines research ethics as applying ethical standards to all stages of research, from planning to evaluation. Key principles discussed include honesty, objectivity, integrity, care for participants, openness, respect for intellectual property, confidentiality, non-discrimination, and social responsibility. The document also covers issues like authorship, plagiarism, peer review, research with animals and humans, and addressing misconduct. Overall, it emphasizes that ethical research promotes values like trust, accountability and protecting participants.
The document discusses several key issues regarding research ethics:
1. Ethical norms in research promote goals like knowledge, truth, and cooperation between researchers. They also help ensure accountability and build public support.
2. Many professional organizations and government agencies have established codes and policies on research ethics to address issues like honesty, objectivity, integrity, and protecting human and animal subjects.
3. Researchers must make ethical decisions by carefully applying rules and considering how their actions may affect others. They should avoid misconduct but also recognize unwritten norms around attribution, conflicts of interest, and sharing information and resources.
This document outlines the key ethical issues in conducting research. It begins by defining research and explaining where research fits within the knowledge management cycle. It then discusses what makes research ethical, outlining principles such as social or scientific value, scientific validity, fair subject selection, favorable risk-benefit ratio, independent review, and informed consent.
The document goes on to discuss specific ethical issues in research, including benefit-harm analysis, vulnerability and the risk-vulnerability matrix, informed consent, fairness and equity, privacy and confidentiality, conflicts of interest, and ethical issues after research is conducted. It provides examples of vulnerable populations like women, pregnant women, and children.
This document discusses various topics relating to ethics in agricultural research. It begins by defining ethics and outlining the main areas of study within ethics. It then discusses ethical issues that can arise in scientific research, including research ethics frameworks like the Nuremberg Code and examples of scientific misconduct. It also addresses agricultural ethics and sustainability concerns, as well as ethics around initiating research, intellectual property rights, research administration, and guidelines for ethical behavior in scientific research. Overall, the document provides an overview of key ethical considerations that are important for conducting agricultural research.
Ethics is not based on scientific principles but rather on personal value systems. Three key points about research ethics are:
1) Researchers must respect all individuals affected by their research through honest, respectful treatment and ensuring no unreasonable demands are made.
2) Informed consent is required where participants are made aware of how their information will be used and how they will be involved.
3) Confidentiality of personal information must be maintained and anonymity ensured where possible.
This document discusses ethical issues in research. It begins by outlining the chapter objectives, which are to explain ethics in research, identify common ethical issues, and discuss other issues. The main section defines research ethics and explores the four key ethical issues: informed consent, privacy and confidentiality, anonymity, and the researcher's responsibilities. It also notes other issues like behavior modification, deception, concealment, and plagiarism. Throughout, it emphasizes respecting participants' dignity, obtaining their full consent, protecting their privacy and anonymity, and researchers' integrity and accountability.
This document discusses research ethics and identifies key principles researchers should follow. It outlines the importance of identifying ethical issues during problem formulation, study design, data collection and analysis, and dissemination of results. Informed consent is also discussed, emphasizing the need to inform participants of study purpose and procedures, risks/benefits, confidentiality, and the voluntary nature of participation. Researchers are advised to consult with institutional review boards if they have any ethical questions or concerns regarding their work.
Ethical in Educational Research by Rauno HuttunenRauno Huttunen
This document provides an overview of key concepts in research ethics. It discusses the Nuremberg Code, which established ethical standards for human experimentation. It also mentions the infamous Tuskegee syphilis experiment, which violated many of the Code's principles. The document outlines the Declaration of Helsinki and the role of the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity in promoting responsible conduct of research. It defines misconduct, fraud, and ethical guidelines including openness, crediting other researchers, and avoiding conflicts of interest.
This document discusses research ethics and the role of ethics review committees. It outlines guiding ethical principles like autonomy, beneficence and justice. It presents examples of ethical issues in research like falsifying data, plagiarism, and failing to obtain informed consent. Unethical practices amount to scientific misconduct. The role of ethics review committees is to ensure research follows ethical standards and protects participants. Researchers must obtain approval from these committees before starting data collection.
This document discusses research ethics and the role of ethics review committees. It outlines guiding ethical principles like autonomy, beneficence and justice. It also identifies issues that would constitute scientific misconduct, such as falsifying data, plagiarism, and violating principles of informed consent. The document explains that ethics review committees ensure research follows ethical standards to protect participants and researchers. The committees review proposals to evaluate risks and benefits before granting approval.
Congestive Heart failure is caused by low cardiac output and high sympathetic discharge. Diuretics reduce preload, ACE inhibitors lower afterload, beta blockers reduce sympathetic activity, and digitalis has inotropic effects. Newer medications target vasodilation and myosin activation to improve heart efficiency while lowering energy requirements. Combination therapy, following an assessment of cardiac function and volume status, is the most effective strategy to heart failure care.
أخلاقيات البحث العلمي - Research Ethics FahadAlQabba
The document discusses ethics in medical research. It covers principles of research ethics including respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Special protections are needed for vulnerable groups participating in research. Researchers have responsibilities like protecting participants, obtaining informed consent, and ensuring scientific integrity. Misconduct in research like fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism undermine scientific validity and violate ethics. Proper documentation and attribution of other's work is important.
This document discusses research ethics and publishing scientific papers. It begins with Islamic quotes emphasizing good character and ethics. It then discusses types of research study designs and their hierarchy of evidence. The document provides guidance on choosing the right journal to publish in, what editors look for in manuscripts, and tips for attracting editors and readers. It also discusses the journal publishing process and peer review. Finally, it discusses the important topic of research ethics, defining key terms and principles such as informed consent, and the roles and responsibilities of research ethics committees.
The document discusses several key principles of ethical research:
1) Researchers must protect study participants from harm and obtain voluntary informed consent from participants.
2) Researchers should collect data anonymously or keep information confidential to protect participants' privacy.
3) Research proposals should undergo review by an Institutional Review Board to evaluate ethics.
4) Accurate reporting of research findings is important to maintain integrity.
This document provides an introduction to research integrity, also known as responsible conduct of research or research ethics. It outlines some of the main areas of focus, including research misconduct, collaboration issues, peer review, conflicts of interest, and human/animal subject research. The document discusses how research ethics is not just about intentionally bad acts, but also imperfect or questionable practices that may seem justified. It provides examples of issues that have arisen in areas like authorship, data sharing and ownership, and socially acceptable practices that are now deemed unethical. Overall, the document provides an overview of the moral foundations and key considerations of research integrity.
This document discusses ethical considerations in research. It defines ethics as rules that guide moral behavior and research principles. Ethics in research provides rules for appropriate and inappropriate research conduct and application of findings. The document outlines three main components of ethics in research: truthfulness, courtesy, and respect for human rights. It provides examples of each component, such as obtaining permission before collecting data, avoiding fraud/misconduct, and protecting participants' confidentiality, dignity, and right to withdraw. The overall summary is that the document defines ethics and its role in research, then outlines and gives examples of three key ethical components to consider which are truthfulness, courtesy, and respect for human rights.
Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Part 1 of the series of lectures I gave for the PEER (Professionalism and Ethics Education for Residents) Project sponsored and organized by the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCHS).
This document discusses ethical principles in social research. It covers historical examples where ethics were not followed, such as the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and research done by Nazi Germany. Key principles discussed include obtaining informed consent, protecting participants from harm, ensuring anonymity and confidentiality, and being honest in reporting results. The document also addresses ethical dilemmas that can arise during and after data collection regarding issues like who owns the data. Researchers must consider all stakeholders and try to maximize benefits and minimize risks of any study.
This document discusses research ethics and academic honesty. It begins by defining key terms related to research integrity and misconduct. The outline then discusses concepts of ethics, good and ethical research practices, ethical theories, data collection and presentation standards, authorship guidelines, and the process of obtaining funding. The document emphasizes principles of research ethics like autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, confidentiality, and integrity. It also defines and discusses research misconduct, including fabrication, falsification and plagiarism.
Scientific integrity and avoiding misconduct are important issues discussed by governments, universities, and the scientific community. Upholding high ethical standards in research helps ensure reliable results and safety. Some examples of misconduct include falsifying or fabricating data, plagiarism, and failing to maintain confidentiality. Consequences for misconduct can be severe, such as job termination, fines, and bans from research. Maintaining integrity through practices like careful record keeping, peer review, and consulting advisors protects scientists and the legitimacy of their work.
The document discusses ethical guidelines for researchers based on the American Sociological Association's code of ethics. It outlines the ASA's five general principles of professional competence, integrity, professional and scientific responsibility, respect for people's rights and diversity, and social responsibility. It also discusses general ethical issues researchers must consider, such as avoiding harm, obtaining informed consent, respecting privacy, avoiding conflicts of interest, and ethical reporting. The document provides examples of techniques to avoid harm like debriefing and case studies of plagiarism issues in Pakistani universities.
This document discusses ethics in research. It defines research ethics as applying ethical standards to all stages of research, from planning to evaluation. Key principles discussed include honesty, objectivity, integrity, care for participants, openness, respect for intellectual property, confidentiality, non-discrimination, and social responsibility. The document also covers issues like authorship, plagiarism, peer review, research with animals and humans, and addressing misconduct. Overall, it emphasizes that ethical research promotes values like trust, accountability and protecting participants.
The document discusses several key issues regarding research ethics:
1. Ethical norms in research promote goals like knowledge, truth, and cooperation between researchers. They also help ensure accountability and build public support.
2. Many professional organizations and government agencies have established codes and policies on research ethics to address issues like honesty, objectivity, integrity, and protecting human and animal subjects.
3. Researchers must make ethical decisions by carefully applying rules and considering how their actions may affect others. They should avoid misconduct but also recognize unwritten norms around attribution, conflicts of interest, and sharing information and resources.
This document outlines the key ethical issues in conducting research. It begins by defining research and explaining where research fits within the knowledge management cycle. It then discusses what makes research ethical, outlining principles such as social or scientific value, scientific validity, fair subject selection, favorable risk-benefit ratio, independent review, and informed consent.
The document goes on to discuss specific ethical issues in research, including benefit-harm analysis, vulnerability and the risk-vulnerability matrix, informed consent, fairness and equity, privacy and confidentiality, conflicts of interest, and ethical issues after research is conducted. It provides examples of vulnerable populations like women, pregnant women, and children.
This document discusses various topics relating to ethics in agricultural research. It begins by defining ethics and outlining the main areas of study within ethics. It then discusses ethical issues that can arise in scientific research, including research ethics frameworks like the Nuremberg Code and examples of scientific misconduct. It also addresses agricultural ethics and sustainability concerns, as well as ethics around initiating research, intellectual property rights, research administration, and guidelines for ethical behavior in scientific research. Overall, the document provides an overview of key ethical considerations that are important for conducting agricultural research.
Ethics is not based on scientific principles but rather on personal value systems. Three key points about research ethics are:
1) Researchers must respect all individuals affected by their research through honest, respectful treatment and ensuring no unreasonable demands are made.
2) Informed consent is required where participants are made aware of how their information will be used and how they will be involved.
3) Confidentiality of personal information must be maintained and anonymity ensured where possible.
This document discusses ethical issues in research. It begins by outlining the chapter objectives, which are to explain ethics in research, identify common ethical issues, and discuss other issues. The main section defines research ethics and explores the four key ethical issues: informed consent, privacy and confidentiality, anonymity, and the researcher's responsibilities. It also notes other issues like behavior modification, deception, concealment, and plagiarism. Throughout, it emphasizes respecting participants' dignity, obtaining their full consent, protecting their privacy and anonymity, and researchers' integrity and accountability.
This document discusses research ethics and identifies key principles researchers should follow. It outlines the importance of identifying ethical issues during problem formulation, study design, data collection and analysis, and dissemination of results. Informed consent is also discussed, emphasizing the need to inform participants of study purpose and procedures, risks/benefits, confidentiality, and the voluntary nature of participation. Researchers are advised to consult with institutional review boards if they have any ethical questions or concerns regarding their work.
Ethical in Educational Research by Rauno HuttunenRauno Huttunen
This document provides an overview of key concepts in research ethics. It discusses the Nuremberg Code, which established ethical standards for human experimentation. It also mentions the infamous Tuskegee syphilis experiment, which violated many of the Code's principles. The document outlines the Declaration of Helsinki and the role of the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity in promoting responsible conduct of research. It defines misconduct, fraud, and ethical guidelines including openness, crediting other researchers, and avoiding conflicts of interest.
This document discusses research ethics and the role of ethics review committees. It outlines guiding ethical principles like autonomy, beneficence and justice. It presents examples of ethical issues in research like falsifying data, plagiarism, and failing to obtain informed consent. Unethical practices amount to scientific misconduct. The role of ethics review committees is to ensure research follows ethical standards and protects participants. Researchers must obtain approval from these committees before starting data collection.
This document discusses research ethics and the role of ethics review committees. It outlines guiding ethical principles like autonomy, beneficence and justice. It also identifies issues that would constitute scientific misconduct, such as falsifying data, plagiarism, and violating principles of informed consent. The document explains that ethics review committees ensure research follows ethical standards to protect participants and researchers. The committees review proposals to evaluate risks and benefits before granting approval.
Similar to Research Ethics for all أخلاقيات البحث العلمي - (20)
Congestive Heart failure is caused by low cardiac output and high sympathetic discharge. Diuretics reduce preload, ACE inhibitors lower afterload, beta blockers reduce sympathetic activity, and digitalis has inotropic effects. Newer medications target vasodilation and myosin activation to improve heart efficiency while lowering energy requirements. Combination therapy, following an assessment of cardiac function and volume status, is the most effective strategy to heart failure care.
TEST BANK For Brunner and Suddarth's Textbook of Medical-Surgical Nursing, 14...Donc Test
TEST BANK For Brunner and Suddarth's Textbook of Medical-Surgical Nursing, 14th Edition (Hinkle, 2017) Verified Chapter's 1 - 73 Complete.pdf
TEST BANK For Brunner and Suddarth's Textbook of Medical-Surgical Nursing, 14th Edition (Hinkle, 2017) Verified Chapter's 1 - 73 Complete.pdf
TEST BANK For Brunner and Suddarth's Textbook of Medical-Surgical Nursing, 14th Edition (Hinkle, 2017) Verified Chapter's 1 - 73 Complete.pdf
Storyboard on Skin- Innovative Learning (M-pharm) 2nd sem. (Cosmetics)MuskanShingari
Skin is the largest organ of the human body, serving crucial functions that include protection, sensation, regulation, and synthesis. Structurally, it consists of three main layers: the epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis (subcutaneous layer).
1. **Epidermis**: The outermost layer primarily composed of epithelial cells called keratinocytes. It provides a protective barrier against environmental factors, pathogens, and UV radiation.
2. **Dermis**: Located beneath the epidermis, the dermis contains connective tissue, blood vessels, hair follicles, and sweat glands. It plays a vital role in supporting and nourishing the epidermis, regulating body temperature, and housing sensory receptors for touch, pressure, temperature, and pain.
3. **Hypodermis**: Also known as the subcutaneous layer, it consists of fat and connective tissue that anchors the skin to underlying structures like muscles and bones. It provides insulation, cushioning, and energy storage.
Skin performs essential functions such as regulating body temperature through sweat production and blood flow control, synthesizing vitamin D when exposed to sunlight, and serving as a sensory interface with the external environment.
Maintaining skin health is crucial for overall well-being, involving proper hygiene, hydration, protection from sun exposure, and avoiding harmful substances. Skin conditions and diseases range from minor irritations to chronic disorders, emphasizing the importance of regular care and medical attention when needed.
“Environmental sanitation means the art and science of applying sanitary, biological and physical science principles and knowledge to improve and control the environment therein for the protection of the health and welfare of the public”.The overall importance of sanitation are to provide a healthy living environment for everyone, to protect the natural resources (such as surface water, groundwater, soil ), and to provide safety, security and dignity for people when they defecate or urinate .Sanitation refers to public health conditions such as drinking clean water, sewage treatment, etc. All the effective tools and actions that help in keeping the environment clean come under sanitation. Sanitation refers to public health conditions such as drinking clean water, sewage treatment. All the effective tools and actions that help in keeping the environment clean and promotes public health is the necessary in todays life.
Gene therapy can be broadly defined as the transfer of genetic material to cure a disease or at least to improve the clinical status of a patient.
One of the basic concepts of gene therapy is to transform viruses into genetic shuttles, which will deliver the gene of interest into the target cells.
Safe methods have been devised to do this, using several viral and non-viral vectors.
In the future, this technique may allow doctors to treat a disorder by inserting a gene into a patient's cells instead of using drugs or surgery.
The biggest hurdle faced by medical research in gene therapy is the availability of effective gene-carrying vectors that meet all of the following criteria:
Protection of transgene or genetic cargo from degradative action of systemic and endonucleases,
Delivery of genetic material to the target site, i.e., either cell cytoplasm or nucleus,
Low potential of triggering unwanted immune responses or genotoxicity,
Economical and feasible availability for patients .
Viruses are naturally evolved vehicles that efficiently transfer their genes into host cells.
Choice of viral vector is dependent on gene transfer efficiency, capacity to carry foreign genes, toxicity, stability, immune responses towards viral antigens and potential viral recombination.
There are a wide variety of vectors used to deliver DNA or oligo nucleotides into mammalian cells, either in vitro or in vivo.
The most common vector system based on retroviruses, adenoviruses, herpes simplex viruses, adeno associated viruses.
Nutritional deficiency Disorder are problems in india.
It is very important to learn about Indian child's nutritional parameters as well the Disease related to alteration in their Nutrition.
As the world population is aging, Health tourism has become vitally important and will be increased day by day. Because
of the availability of quality health services and more favorable prices as well as to shorten the waiting list for medical
services regionally and internationally. There are some aspects of managing and doing marketing activities in order for
medical tourism to be feasible, in a region called as clustering in a region with main stakeholders groups includes Health
providers, Tourism cluster, etc. There are some related and affecting factors to be considered for the feasibility of medical
tourism within this study such as competitiveness, clustering, Entrepreneurship, SMEs. One of the growth phenomenon
is Health tourism in the city of Izmir and Turkey. The model of five competitive forces of Porter and The Diamond model
that is an economical model that shows the four main factors that affect the competitiveness of a nation and its industries
in this study. The short literature of medical tourism and regional clustering have been mentioned.
CLASSIFICATION OF H1 ANTIHISTAMINICS-
FIRST GENERATION ANTIHISTAMINICS-
1)HIGHLY SEDATIVE-DIPHENHYDRAMINE,DIMENHYDRINATE,PROMETHAZINE,HYDROXYZINE 2)MODERATELY SEDATIVE- PHENARIMINE,CYPROHEPTADINE, MECLIZINE,CINNARIZINE
3)MILD SEDATIVE-CHLORPHENIRAMINE,DEXCHLORPHENIRAMINE
TRIPROLIDINE,CLEMASTINE
SECOND GENERATION ANTIHISTAMINICS-FEXOFENADINE,
LORATADINE,DESLORATADINE,CETIRIZINE,LEVOCETIRIZINE,
AZELASTINE,MIZOLASTINE,EBASTINE,RUPATADINE. Mechanism of action of 2nd generation antihistaminics-
These drugs competitively antagonize actions of
histamine at the H1 receptors.
Pharmacological actions-
Antagonism of histamine-The H1 antagonists effectively block histamine induced bronchoconstriction, contraction of intestinal and other smooth muscle and triple response especially wheal, flare and itch. Constriction of larger blood vessel by histamine is also antagonized.
2) Antiallergic actions-Many manifestations of immediate hypersensitivity (type I reactions)are suppressed. Urticaria, itching and angioedema are well controlled.3) CNS action-The older antihistamines produce variable degree of CNS depression.But in case of 2nd gen antihistaminics there is less CNS depressant property as these cross BBB to significantly lesser extent.
4) Anticholinergic action- many H1 blockers
in addition antagonize muscarinic actions of ACh. BUT IN 2ND gen histaminics there is Higher H1 selectivitiy : no anticholinergic side effects
Storyboard on Acne-Innovative Learning-M. pharm. (2nd sem.) CosmeticsMuskanShingari
Acne is a common skin condition that occurs when hair follicles become clogged with oil and dead skin cells. It typically manifests as pimples, blackheads, or whiteheads, often on the face, chest, shoulders, or back. Acne can range from mild to severe and may cause emotional distress and scarring in some cases.
**Causes:**
1. **Excess Oil Production:** Hormonal changes during adolescence or certain times in adulthood can increase sebum (oil) production, leading to clogged pores.
2. **Clogged Pores:** When dead skin cells and oil block hair follicles, bacteria (usually Propionibacterium acnes) can thrive, causing inflammation and acne lesions.
3. **Hormonal Factors:** Fluctuations in hormone levels, such as during puberty, menstrual cycles, pregnancy, or certain medical conditions, can contribute to acne.
4. **Genetics:** A family history of acne can increase the likelihood of developing the condition.
**Types of Acne:**
- **Whiteheads:** Closed plugged pores.
- **Blackheads:** Open plugged pores with a dark surface.
- **Papules:** Small red, tender bumps.
- **Pustules:** Pimples with pus at their tips.
- **Nodules:** Large, solid, painful lumps beneath the surface.
- **Cysts:** Painful, pus-filled lumps beneath the surface that can cause scarring.
**Treatment:**
Treatment depends on the severity and type of acne but may include:
- **Topical Treatments:** Such as benzoyl peroxide, salicylic acid, or retinoids to reduce bacteria and unclog pores.
- **Oral Medications:** Antibiotics or oral contraceptives for hormonal acne.
- **Procedures:** Such as chemical peels, extraction of comedones, or light therapy for more severe cases.
**Prevention and Management:**
- **Cleanse:** Regularly wash skin with a gentle cleanser.
- **Moisturize:** Use non-comedogenic moisturizers to keep skin hydrated without clogging pores.
- **Avoid Irritants:** Such as harsh cosmetics or excessive scrubbing.
- **Sun Protection:** Use sunscreen to prevent exacerbation of acne scars and inflammation.
Acne treatment can take time, and consistency in skincare routines and treatments is crucial. Consulting a dermatologist can help tailor a treatment plan that suits individual needs and reduces the risk of scarring or long-term skin damage.
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/RvdYsTzgQq8
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/ECILGWtgZko
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
The biomechanics of running involves the study of the mechanical principles underlying running movements. It includes the analysis of the running gait cycle, which consists of the stance phase (foot contact to push-off) and the swing phase (foot lift-off to next contact). Key aspects include kinematics (joint angles and movements, stride length and frequency) and kinetics (forces involved in running, including ground reaction and muscle forces). Understanding these factors helps in improving running performance, optimizing technique, and preventing injuries.
Public Health Lecture 4 Social Sciences and Public Health
Research Ethics for all أخلاقيات البحث العلمي -
1. Ethics Issues in Medical
Research
Dr Abdulaziz F Alkaabba
MBBS, ABFM, JBFM, MSc ME, MSc Bioethics
Professor of Family Medicine , Ethicist
Dr. Ghiath Alahmad MD, PhD
KAIMRC
2. Why we need to know ethics
in Medical Research ??
What is the Answer ??
How many papers we published last year ??
3. (Our Objectives in this presentation )
To Know and to Discuss What is the :
1. Research Ethics?
2. History and importance of research ethics.
3. Principles of research ethics.
4. Guidelines of research ethics.
5. Ethics committees in research( IRB or REC).
4.
5. UNIVERSAL ETHICAL
PRINCIPLES IN RESEARCH
Principle of Beneficence
Principle of Respect for Human Dignity
Principle of Justice
Vulnerable Groups
Ethical code of Conduct of Health Profession
Scientific misconduct in Research
7. Principles of Research Ethics
Re spe c t for Pe r son
Beneficence
Justice
Autonomy, self-determination
Capacity to decide, make choices
The dignity of people and individual
Respect for community and local culture
8. Principles of Research Ethics
Re spe c t for Pe r son
Be ne fic e nc e
Ju stic e
Autonomy, self-determination
Capacity to decide, make choices
The dignity of people and individual
Respect for community and local culture
9. Principles of Research Ethics
Re spe c t for Pe r son
Be ne fic e nc e
Ju stic e
Physical, mental and social well-being
Risks reduced to a minimum, non-maleficence
Protection of the participant is the primary
Responsibility of the researcher
Benefits for the communities where the
research will be conducted
10. Principles of Research Ethics
Re spe c t for Pe r son
Be ne fic e nc e
Ju stic e
Physical, mental and social well-being
Risks reduced to a minimum, non-maleficence
Protection of the participant is the primary
Responsibility of the researcher
Benefits for the communities where the
Research will be conducted
11. Principles of Research Ethics
Re spe c t for Pe r son
Be ne fic e nc e
Ju stic e
Distribution of risk and benefit
Equitable recruitment of research participants
Special protection for vulnerable groups
12. Principles of Research Ethics
Special protection for vulnerable groups
Pregnant women
Children
Prisoners
Mentally ill
Limited education
Poor
Terminally ill
Women in some
circumstances
23. Informed Consent
NOT just a signed document
NOT a one time event
A process of shared
decision-making
between subject
and investigator.
• Consent- is An
Autonomous
authorization of
a medical
intervention
by… individual
patients-
(Beauchamp
(2004)
24. What is Ethical Review?
It is a process by which research
proposals are reviewed for their
compliance and accordance with the
national/international ethical principles
& guidelines for research involving
human subjects.
24 Research Ethics, FOM, Mar.
25. Parties of Research Ethics
REC or IRB
Researcher
Sponsor
Community representative
26. Review and Approval
of research protocols
Regulations
REC
Community
Representative
Responsible
advise
31. Privacy vs. Confidentiality
Privacy
About people
Sense of being in
control of access
that others have to
ourselves
A Right to be
Protected
Confidentiality
Extension of privacy
About identifiable data
an Agreement about
maintenance and who
has access to
identifiable data
HIPAA - protects patients
from inappropriate
disclosures of "Protected
Health Information" (PHI)
من
العلمي البحث أخالقيات
v
المصداقية
(Truthfulness)
v
المهنية
)
Professionalism
(
v
السالمة
(Safety)
v
الثقة
(Trust)
v
الموافقة
Consent)
(
32. Definitions
Privacy –
about people and our sense of being in
control of others access to ourselves or to
information about ourselves with others.
Confidentiality –
treatment of identifiable, private
information that has been disclosed to
others.
من
العلمي البحث أخلقيات
v
المصداقية
(Truthfulness)
v
المهنية
)
Professionalism
(
v
السلمة
(Safety)
v
الثقة
(Trust)
v
الموافقة
Consent)
(
v
الدقة
)
Accuracy
(
v
المسؤولية
)
(Responsibility)
v
األمانة
العلمية
)
(Integrity)
v
التعاون
)
Collaboration
(
v
المعلومات سرية
Confidentiality
)
(
v
الموضوعية
)
Objectivity
(
أخالقيات
البحث
العلمي
33.
34. “Misconduct in Science means fabrication, falsification,
plagiarism or other practices that seriously deviate
from commonly accepted within the scientific
community for proposing, conducting, or reporting
research.”
US federal policy, 42 CFR 50.102
Definition of Scientific Misconduct (
(
السلوك سوء
-
السرقات
35. It does not include honest error or
honest differences in
interpretations or judgment of data
Definition of Scientific Misconduct
36. Your Opinion ?
Many people Have
confused Issues About
this Topic ??????
37. Scientific Misconduct Definition
• Fabrication – making it up
• (
التلفيق
-
أصال موجدة غير معلومات
)
• Falsification – changing the true description
التزييف
/
التزوير
-
الموجودة المعلومات تغيير
) )
• Plagiarism – taking the words and ideas of others
without citation (
انتحال
وسرقة
الكلمات أو اآلراء
)
•that seriously deviate from the Reality
•Other – self plagiarism - add my name to Research
without any participation , change in scientific
certifications , cheating in Exam )
39. Survey of College Students
(200) students assignments
75 % admit to some cheating.
41 % have Plagiarized through the Internet.
The Center for Academic Integrity, 2002.
40. Types of Misconduct Total %
Fabrication 18
Falsification 64
Plagiarism 8
Fabrication/Falsification 47
Other 13
*Adapted from report of Office of Research Integrity, Scientific Misconduct Investigations
(ORI,)
Type of Misconduct in other study
in 150 Cases: of student's report
41.
42. It is making up data or results and
recording or reporting them.
( Creation of data without proper experimentation
or changing the numbers to improve the results).
Fabrication التلفيق
-
معلومات
المعلومات موجودة غير
43. Misconduct – Examples:
Fabrication:
• Creating records/ Filling up missing data.
• Making up progress reports
• Creating records of calls and follow-up
(ORI web-site of Office of Research Integrity, )
44. Manipulating research materials,
equipment, or processes, or changing or
omitting data or results such that the
research is not accurately represented in
the research record.
Falsification -
التزييف
/
التزوير
-
تغيير
المعلومات
45. Fraud or Falsification
Fraud means: االنتحال أو التزييف
Turning in someone else's writing as your
own;
Inventing statistics or sources that do not
exist;
Falsifying evidence.
العلمي السطو تهمة في الوقوع
46. Misconduct – Examples:
Falsifications:
Subject substitution one for another.
False reporting of data.
Altering results of subject’s eligibility visit.
Altering dates on screening.
Failing to update subject’s record when it is
required.
Altering tests on blood samples.
Falsifying the times that blood samples were
drawn from human subjects.
48. “the appropriation of another person’s
ideas, processes, results, or words
without giving appropriate credit.”
Plagiarism الكلمات أو اآلراء انتحال
49. Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Is the presentation of words, ideas, images, or
creative works without
giving proper credit to their originators.
It is an academic crime—even when
plagiarism is unintentional.
العلمي للسطو مبسط تعريف
50. Misconduct – Examples:
Plagiarism:
Copycat (verbatim) of large portions of
another publication without attribution.
Rephrasing of an original idea as one’s own
original idea without attribution.
Lack of acknowledgement of previous work.
نفسه الشخص عمل من السرقة
- ( self plagiarism).
51. Duplication of publication
Repeat publication or
publication of the same work
in a different journal or forum.
Occasionally, an article may be a
chapter in another book or
symposium.
52.
53. • Money
• Reputation
• Fame (International recognition/Nobel Prize .
• Conflict of Interest
• Promotion
• Pressure to produce
• Poor Training
• Complex research environment/competition
Factors Contributing and
supporting Scientific Misconduct
58. Who Can Be Cited For
Misconduct
Primary Investigator
(He-She is responsible for all study activities)
Sub Investigators
Research Staff
59. Who might suspect and report
misconduct?
Study monitors
Supervisors – committees
Editors
Study staff or other contributors
Peer reviewers/journal readers
Subjects and their families
61. Plagiarism Detection Tools
During the 20 years that OSI/ORI have existed,
investigators have developed a number of computer-
assisted tools and approaches to help strengthen
institutional findings. As
grammerly programmer
Research by ORI (office of Research Integrity)
62. Many FREE Plagiarism Detection Tools
Anti-Plagiarism
Anti-Plagiarism is a software designed to effectively detect and thereby prevent
plagiarism.
DupliChecker
PaperRater
Paper Rater offers three tools: Grammar Checking, Plagiarism Detection and Writing
Suggestions.
Plagiarisma.net
PlagiarismChecker
PlagiarismChecker.com makes it simple for educators to check whether a student's
paper has been copied from the Internet.
Plagium
PlagTracker
63. How to Prevent It
Training, training, and
more
والتدريب المعرفة
للجميع والتعليم
66. Guidelines on Authorship
Co-author must participate in:
1. Conception or design, or analysis and
interpretation
2. Drafting or editing portion (s) or revision of the
article
3. Intellectual input to the proposal for funding
Order of authorship commensurate to
contributions
Graduate student’s thesis should have the
student’s name as first author
67. Guidelines on Authorship
The following conditions does NOT justify
authorship:
• Participation solely in the acquisition of funding
or the collection of data.
• Peer reviewing of the article.
• General supervision of the research group.
68. Unethical forms of authorship
Authorship
misconduct
Definition
Ghost-ا الشبح
وال البحث يكتب لذي
بالبحث اسمه يضع
له ويدفع
Authors who contributed to the work but are not listed, generally to hide a conflict of interest from editors,
reviewers, and readers.
An author is paid to write an article but does not contribute to the article in any other way.
Guest -
الضيف
-
اسمه يضع زائرالذي
منصبه علشان بالبحث
Individuals given authorship credit who have not contributed in any substantive way to the research but are
added to the author list by virtue of their stature in the organization.
Orphan الذي هو
ولم البحث في عمل
اسمه يضاف
Authors who contributed materially to the work but are omitted from the author list unfairly by the drafting
team.
Forged/Gift تم هو
ولم بالبحث اسمة وضع
النشر لزيادة يعلم
Unwitting authors who had no part in the work but whose names are appended to the paper without their
knowledge to increase the likelihood of publication.
70. Scientific Misconduct Definition
• Fabrication – making it up
• (
التلفيق
-
أصال موجدة غير معلومات
)
• Falsification – changing the true description
التزييف
/
التزوير
-
الموجودة المعلومات تغيير
) )
• Plagiarism – taking the words and ideas of others
without citation (
انتحال
وسرقة
الكلمات أو اآلراء
)
•that seriously deviate from the Reality
•Other – self plagiarism - add may name to Research
without any participation , change in scientific
certifications , cheating in Exam )