2. KATE OWENS, URBAN DEVELOPMENT MANAGER
RESCALING TOD
Examining Dar es Salaam
3. DAR ES SALAAM: SPRAWLING STATUS QUO
Source: Owens, dissertation 2014
0
50
100
150
200
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617181920
Density(people/hectare)
Km from CBD
Density Profile (1988)
0
50
100
150
200
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617181920
Density(people/hectare)
Km from CBD
Density Profile (2002)
0
50
100
150
200
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617181920
Density(people/hectare)
Km from CBD
Density Profile (2012)
More than a 2 million new residents between 1988 - 2012
Majority of the growth was on the outskirts of the city
4. BRT: FIRST ATTEMPT TO COMBAT SPRAWL
Source: Owens, background paper, Tanzania Urbanization Review
5. TOD: BOLD VISION TO LEVERAGE BRT
Source: Kinondoni Municipal Government
How do you finance this?
How you do obtain land?
Who will use this space?
6. FINANCE: LAND VALUE CAPTURE
Source: Owens, background report for Tanzania Urbanization Review
$3,900 annually
$23,000 annually
Betterment Levies: huge operations implications & little fiscal impact
8. SOLUTIONS: LAND POOLING
Pros
• Local ten cell leaders have deep
knowledge of ownership
• Residents are long term
• Potential of spreading benefits
Cons
• Operationally and institutionally
difficult
• Slow process in need of long term
support
• Potential for collusion
Source: Owens, background paper, Tanzania Urbanization Review
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
0 - 100 101 - 200 201 - 300 301 - 400 401 - 500 more
than 500
ShareofParcelswithin200mofManzeseStops
Parcel Area (m2)
9. SOLUTIONS: RESCALING THE VISION
Source: Owens, background paper, Tanzania Urbanization Review
Existing Land Use is mixed
Large parcel for redevelopment
Upgrading existing is financially feasible
10. CONCLUSIONS
• Land use changes around BRT investment
is not automatic
• Land pooling needs to be better explored
and supported
• Reposition investment and development
expectations
• Incorporate design elements that are
locally relevant