REDEFINING HOMEOPATHY PRESENTATION

3 DAYS LECTURE SERIES
(12 HOURS)
REDEFINING HOMEOPATHY
AS MOLECULAR IMPRINTS THERAPEUTICS
Presented by: Chandran K C, Author, REDEFINING
HOMEOPATHY
A SCIENTIFIC PERSPECTIVE TO HOMEOPATHY IS
POSSIBLE!

Presented by: Chandran K C, Author, REDEFINING
HOMEOPATHY
RDEFINING HOMOPATHY
AS MOLECULAR IMPRINTS THERAPEUTICS
THERE ARE A LOT OF UNANSWERED, INSUFFICIENTLY ANSWERED AND IMPROPERLY ANSWERED
QUESTIONS IN HOMEOPATHY. A LOT OF GREY AND DARK AREAS THERE, WHICH NEED TO BE
EXPLORED USING THE SEARCHLIGHT OF MODERN SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE.
HOMEOPATHY IS NOW LEARNED AND PRACTICED ON THE BASIS OF CERTAIN 'DOGMAS' AND
'BELIEFS', MORE THAN ACTUAL 'KNOWLEDGE‘.
MORE 'MISUNDERSTANDINGS' THAN 'UNDERSTANDINGS'.
WE HAVE TO TRY TO SYSTEMATICALLY RESOLVE EACH AND EVERY RIDDLES INVOLVED IN
HOMEOPATHY USING MODERN SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND ITS METHODS.
I AM TRYING TO DO THAT, WITHIN MY LIMITATIONS. IT IS MY LIFE MISSION.
I KNOW, IT IS BOUND TO BE A SLOW PROCESS, THROUGH WHICH HOMEOPATHY WILL PROGRESSIVELY
EVOLVE INTO A FULL-FLEDGED SYSTEM OF MEDICAL SCIENCE.
THE BOOK ‘RDEFINING HOMEOPATHY’ CONSISTS OF THE IDEAS
SO FAR EVOLVED THROUGH THIS INQUIRY

3000 Pages/ 3 Volumes
Hard Bound
PRICE :
IN INDIA: INR 6000
OTHER COUNTRIES :
USD 300
(Shipping Charge Included
)
Call:
919446520252

As Molecular Imprints Therapeutics
3 Days Lecture Series
BROAD OUTLINE OF TOPICS DISCUSSED
DAY ONE
LECTURE ONE – 2 hours
WHY WE NEED A
REDEFINING OF HOMEOPATHY?
An Overview of Current Scenario, Mounting Skeptic Attacks
Threatening The Existence Of Homeopathy, Damages Caused by
Unscientific and Pseudoscientific Theories, Damages Caused By
Dogmatism, Damages Caused By Dynamism, Damages Caused
By Different Schools and Gurus, Damages Caused By Short-
sighted Researchers, Historical Limitations Of Hahnemann, Need
For Scientific Updating Homeopathy
Presented by: Chandran K C, Author, REDEFINING HOMEOPATHY

DAY ONE
LECTURE TWO- 2 hours
REDEFINING FUNDAMENTALS
Life As Vital Processes, Chemistry Of Life, Protein Dynamics,
Genetic Expressions, Epigenetics, Molecular Inhibitions, Key-Lock
Mechanism of Ligand-Target Interactions, Disease, Molecular
Pathology, Symptoms, Mind & Body, Cure, Drugs, Vital
Force&Dynamic Energy.

DAY TWO
LECTURE ONE- 2 hours
INTRODUCING MIT CONCEPTS
What Happens During Potentization?, Supra-molecular Chemistry
Of Potentization, Molecular Imprinting In Water-Alcohol Matrix,
Active Principles Of High Dilution Drugs, Molecular Imprinted
Artificial Ligand Binds- MIALBS, What is Biological Mechanism
Involved in Similia Similibus Curentur? Conveyance Of Molecular
Imprints To The Biological Targets, Scientific Proofs For MIT
Concepts.

DAY TWO
REDEFINING ‘MIASMS’
AND OTHER ‘FUNDAMENTAL’ CONCEPTS
Miasms As Off-Target Actions Of Antibodies, How Many Miasms?,
Constitutions, Chronic Diseases, Nosodes, Sarcodes, Auto
Immune Diseases, Proteinopathies, Aging As Accumulation Of
Protein Errors

DAY THREE
LECTURE ONE- 2 hours
PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS OF
Confusions Regarding Drug Proving, Antimiasmatic Prescriptions,
Biochemistry Prescriptions, Total Cure Prescriptions &
Combinations, Homeopathic Aggravations , Follow Ups &
Complementary Prescriptions , Repetition Of Doses, Mother
Tinctures & Low Potencies, Potency Selection, Drug Relationships
& Antidoting , Single Drug-Single Dose

DAY THREE
LOOKING INTO FUTURE
Converging of Homeopathy and Modern Molecular Medicine Into
Molecular Imprints Medicine, Computer Aided Molecular Imprinted
Drug Designs, Target Specific Molecular Imprinted Biological
Ligands, Evolving New Imprinting Techniques, Universal Range
Of Molecular Imprinted Drugs or MIALBS

DAY ONE
LECTURE ONE
BEGINS

DAY ONE- LECTURE ONE – 2 hours
WHY WE NEED A REDEFINING OF HOMEOPATHY?
Introduction And Overview of Current Scenario
*Introduction *Second Largest Medical System in the World *Wrongly listed under CAM
Umbrella * 200+ Homeopathic Colleges in India *More than 4 lacs registered
homeopaths *Thousands of Govt dispensaries and Hospitals *Millions are cured
*Growing Homeopathic Pharma sales *But we fail in RCTs *We fail to Explain What are
the active principles of potentized drugs *We fail to explain how homeopathy works
*Homeopathy is considered by scientific community as implausible *Dilemma of
Homeopathy: Rational Objective results- Irrational Unscientific Theories *International
Homeopathy is led by unscientific theoreticians

A scientific REDEFINING and rational rebuilding of the whole system is essential, to emancipate
this powerful therapeutic art from the clutches of unscientific, metaphysical and vitalistic ideologies.
Modern scientific knowledge and its technologies have evolved into such a state of maturity that we
can now at least attempt with their help to provide a scientific and satisfactory explanation for the
centuries-old mysteries and riddles associated with this wonderful therapeutic system. Such a
fundamental re-building shall obviously result in finally enthroning homeopathy on its rightful status
as the most advanced branch of modern medical science, unfairly denied for more than last two
hundred years. In this modern era of scientific enlightenment and technological advance, we can no
longer hope to proceed further ahead with Homeopathy, without the help of a well proven and
universally acceptable scientific THEORY an PRACTICE. We can no longer hope to depend merely
upon certain set of somewhat mysterious ‘quotes’ and philosophical speculations inherited from our
great masters and ‘stalwarts’. It is very important that Homeopathy has to be first of all dealt with as
a subject of science, not as areligion or philosophy. Essentially, the principles of Homeopathy have
to achieve the right to be recognized as part of modern medical science. To begin with, it has to
attain acceptability among the modern scientific community, at least in terms of methodology, and
paradigms. To be a legitimate branch of modern medical science, it is imperative that homeopathy
should no more remain a mere collection of inflexible theories and dogmas. It should transform into
a vibrant knowledge system, undergoing an endless process of re-inventing, learning, self-renewal,
and advancement. It should be capable of proving its theories and propositions according to
scientific method, to imbibe new ideas into its theoretical framework, and to discard obsolete ones
mercilessly. To be scientific, approach of homeopathy towards the constantly advancing human

Facing The Challenges of Scientific Community
Skeptical scientists deny homeopathy works on the reason that nobody could explain how
homeopathy works. They should be said, the issue of efficacy of homeopathy should not be
confused with the lack of explanations or wrong explanations regarding how homeopathy works.
Pseudoscientific homeopathic theoreticians have contributed a lot in alienating homeopathy from
scientific community, through their vitalistic and energy medicine theories that never agree with
scientific knowledge system or scientific methods. In order to promote scientific homeopathy, we
have to address fllowing preliminary tasks:
1. Convince the scientific community that homeopathy works, through demonstrations and
scientifically acceptable clinical studies. 2. Convince them the importance of differentiating objective
observational part of homeopathy from the unscientific theoretical or explanatory part of
homeopathy. 3. Propose a scientifically viable working hypothesis regarding how homeopathy
works, in a way fitting to the existing scientific knowledge system. 4. Prove the propositions of this
hypothesis using scientific methods, in a way undisputable to the scientific community. While
addressing this four-pointed fundamental tasks, scientific homeopathy will have to relentlessly fight
against the negative-minded skeptics as well as pseudo-scientific energy medicine theoreticians of
homeopathy. We have to consistently tell the world, real homeopathy is entirely different from those
nonsense the pseudoscientific homeopathic theoreticians preach and practice. We have to
understand and tell the homeopathic community that the negative-minded anti-homeopathic
skeptics are entirely different from real scientific community.

Why Scientists Say Homeopathy is Unscientific?
Science demands proving everything according to scientific methods. Homeopathy is so far not
proved by scientific methods, and as such, scientific community has every right to say homeopathy
is not a science, but a belief system.It is our duty to prove that they are wrong. Homeopathic
theoreticians till date try to explain the ‘modus operandi’ of potentized homeopathic medicines using
one or other hypotheses available or evolved by them, which do not agree with existing scientific
knowledge system, and as such, homeopathy still belongs to a class of scientifically ‘unexplained
experience’’.The sad thing we should never forget is that we have not yet evolved even a
scientifically viable working hypothesis regarding homeopathy. By the term ‘hypothesis’ we mean a
‘proposed explanation’ or “educated guess” for a phenomenon that we observe around us. Every
‘proposed explanation’ cannot be considered a ‘scientific hypothesis’. To be a ‘scientific hypothesis’,
the scientific method requires that one can test the hypothesis using available scientific tools and
methodology. Every new scientific hypotheses are generally based on previous observations that
could not be satisfactorily be explained with the existing scientific theories. The words “hypothesis”
and “theory” are often used synonymously in common and informal usage, even though a
‘scientific hypothesis’ is not exactly the same as ‘a scientific theory’. A hypothesis should be proved
‘using scientific tools’ in order to become a scientific theory. A ‘working hypothesis’ is a provisionally
accepted hypothesis that is ready to be proved. Experimenters will have to test and reject several
hypotheses before solving the given problem ultimately.

Impact Of UK Select Committee Report 2010
In early 2010, the UK's Parliamentary Science and Technology Select Committee published a report
into homeopathy and whether it should be funded by the government as part of the National Health
Service. Actually, the report submitted by the committee is the basis of all subsequent state-initiated
anti-homeopathic measures in various countries around the world. The report was concluded with a
recommendation to the government that “government should not endorse the use of placebo
treatments, including homeopathy. Homeopathy should not be funded on the NHS and the MHRA
should stop licensing homeopathic products. The report also warned the government that there is a
“risk of endorsing homeopathy as an efficacious system of medicine", if the government decides to
“provide homeopathy on the NHS”, and allow MHRA licensing of homeopathic products products”.
After defining what is homeopathy, the committee went on identify “TWO main "concerns" involved
in evaluating homeopathy: ”There appear to be two main concerns. The first is the principle of like-
cures-like and the second is about how ultra-dilutions could retain characteristics of the active
ingredient".
These “two main concerns” where critically addressed by the committee, leading to the conclusion:
“We conclude that the principle of like-cures-like is theoretically weak. It fails to provide a credible
physiological mode of action for homeopathic products. We note that this is the settled view of
medical science”. The committee consider “the principle of like-cures-like is theoretically weak”.
Reason? It fails to provide a “credible physiological mode of action” for homeopathic drugs.

Australian NHMRCReport 2016
NHMRC concludes: “Based on the overall findings of the assessment of the evidences of
effectiveness of homeopathy, NHMRC has reached the following final conclusions: There is no
reliable evidence from research in humans that homeopathy is effective for treating the range of
health conditions considered. There were no health conditions for which there was reliable evidence
that homeopathy was effective. Homeopathy should not be used to treat health conditions that are
chronic, serious, or could become serious. People who choose homeopathy may put their health at
risk if they reject or delay treatments for which there is good evidence for safety and effectiveness.
People who are considering whether to use homeopathy should first get advice from a registered
health practitioner. Those who use homeopathy should tell their health practitioner, and should keep
taking any prescribed treatments. For some health conditions, studies reported that homeopathy
was not more effective than placebo. For other health conditions, some studies reported that
homeopathy was more effective than placebo, or as effective as another treatment, but those
studies were not reliable. To be confident that the reported health benefits of homeopathy were not
just due to chance or the placebo effect, they would need to be confirmed by other well-designed
studies with an adequate number of participants. For the remaining health conditions it was not
possible to make any conclusion about whether homeopathy was effective or not, because there
was not enough evidence.”

Damages Caused by Unscientific And Pseudoscientific
Theories
*Spiritual Homeopathy *CAM Practitioners *Hair Transmission *Photo Transmission
*MP3 Homeopathy *Digital Biology *Energy Medicine Theories *Water Memory *Paper
Energization *Dream Proving *Trituration Proving *Radionics Machines *Pendulum
Dowsing *Various Occult Practices

Damages Caused by Energy Medicine Theories
Actually, ‘energy medicine’, energy therapy or energy healing is a branch of complementary and
alternative medicine basically distinct from homeopathy. It is based on the belief that a healer is
able to channel healing energy into the person seeking help by different methods: hands-on, hands-
off, and distant (or absent) where the patient and healer are in different locations. There are various
schools of energy healing. It is known as biofield energy healing,spiritual healing, contact healing,
distant healing, therapeutic touch, Reiki or Qigong. Spiritual healing is largely non-denominational
and traditional religious faith is not seen as a aterialite for effecting a cure. Faith healing, by
contrast, takes place within a religious context. Homeopathy is essentially a form of ‘drug therapy’.
It has nothing to do with ‘energy medicine’. Homeopathy should be understood, explained and
practiced as a scientific medicine.‘Homeopathy is energy medicine’- this theory is intentionally
propagated world over by proponents of diverse colors of occult and pseudo-scientific practices
destroying the scientific credentials of homeopathy. They spin fanciful theories about homeopathy
using ‘vibration theory’, ‘bio-magnetism’,’wave theory’, ‘electro-magnetic radiations’, ‘frequencies’,
‘resonance theory’, ‘piezo-electricity’ and various other absurd theories, pretending themselves to
be ‘ultra-scientific’. These people are gravely alienating homeopathy from mainstream scientific
knowledge system.

DAY ONE-- LECTURE ONE – 2 hours
Damages Caused By Dogmatism
*Stagnation of Homeopathy *Homeopathy as belief System *Talking about Limitations of
Science *Hesitation to imbibe scientific knowledge *Homeopathy is Ultimate Science?
*Organon as Ultimate Reference * How to study Hahnemann- Dogmatically or
Dialectically? *Groping in the darkness of 250 year old knowledge environment
*Avogadro Theory and Homeopaths *Lack of Rational Thinking *Ask what-why-how
about everything!

Damages Caused By Blind Beliefs
Most homeopaths are ‘believers’. For them, homeopathy is a sacred ‘belief system’.
They ‘believe’ that ‘homeopathy is ultimate science’ and ‘our master’ is ‘greatest scientist
of all times’. They ‘believe’ in master, ‘believe’ in organon’, ‘believe’ in ‘similia similibus
curentur’, ‘believe’ in ‘vital force’, ‘believe’ in ‘dynamic drug energy’, ‘believe’ in ‘miasms’,
‘believe’ in ‘immutable fundamental principles’, ‘believe in ‘single drug-single dose’,
‘believe’ in ‘hering laws’, ‘believe’ in ‘drug relationships’, ‘believe’ in ‘words of stalwarts’,
‘believe’ in ‘teachers’ and ‘gurus’. This list of ‘homeopathic beliefs’ is fascinating as well
as unending. They ask me: “do you believe in homeopathy?” They hesitate to
accommodate new knowledge. They never ask ‘why-what-how’ about their beliefs. They
would never tolerate anybody asking such hard questions. Without displacing our deep-
rooted ‘blind beliefs’ with ‘scientific knowledge’, we cannot hope homeopathy to become
a scientific medical system. Study, research, experiment, learn, know and apply- that is
the way of science. Not blind believing and following.

Why should Homeopaths Challenge Avogadro?
In chemistry and physics, the Avogadro constant is defined as the ratio of the number of constituent
particles (usually atoms or molecules) in a sample to the amount of substance n (unit mole) . Thus,
it is the proportionality factor that relates the molar mass of an entity, i.e., the mass per amount of
substance, to the mass of said entity. The Avogadro constant expresses the number of elementary
entities per mole of substance and it has the value 6.02214129(27)×10^23 mol. Changes in the SI
units are proposed that will change Avogadro’s constant to to exactly 6.02214X×10^23 when it is
expressed in the unit mol. Avogadro number is used to calculate the number of molecules or atoms
in a given quantity of any substance. It is defined that 1 gram mol of any substance will contain
6.022x10^23 numbers of its molecules. 1 gram mol is the molecular mass of a substance
expressed in grams. Since molecular mass of hydrogen is 2, 2 grams of hydrogen constitutes 1
gram mol of hydrogen, and it will contrain 6.022x10^23 number of hydrogen nolecules. Molecular
mass of oxygen is 32, and hence 32 gms of oxygen will contain 6.022x10^23 oxygen molecules.
Molecular mass of water is 18, and hence 18 gms of water will contain 6.022x10^23 h2o molecules.
Molecular mass of carbon is 12, and hence 12 gms of carbon will contain 6.022x10^23 carbon
molecules. In other words, 2 gms of hydrogen, 32 gms of oxygen, 18 gms of water and 12 gams of
carbon will contain EQUAL NUMBER of molecules, which is a fixed number 6.022x10^23.

Damages Caused By Different Schools and Gurus
Damages Done by interpreters *Damages Done By Kent *Gurus an Disciples Culture
*Believe What Guru Say- No Questions! *Unscientific Theories *Predictive School
*Sensation School *Sehgal School *Hair Transmission School *Vithoulkas School
*Facial Analysis School *Temperament School *Methods and Packages *Seminar
Business *Lack of Scientific Awareness is Common to all Gurus *No Guru Asks or
Answers Fundamental Questions Regarding Active Principles Of High Dilution Drugs or
Biological Mechanism Of Homeopathic Cure

Damages Caused By ‘Research’ Done Without Any
Baseline Working Hypothesis
*Importance Of Hypothesis in Scientific Method *Works Of Benveniste *Damages Done
By IIT- B and Other Nanoparticle Researchers *Researches By Pro:Khuda Bukhsh and
Coworkers *Luc Montaigner *Right Observations- Wrong Interpretations

DAY ONE - LECTURE ONE – 2 hours
Vital Force Theory- The Greatest Stumbling Block
The concept of ‘vital force’, on which the whole philosophical system of homeopathy is built up
on, stands as a formidable stumbling block in its way of harmony with modern science and its
methodology. The theoretical basis of Hahnemannian homeopathy is based on the some
what spiritual concept that there is an abstract ‘vital force’ alien to the physical body, existing as a
part of ‘universal force’ which enters the body and possesses to enliven it, and leaves it with the
advent of death. Homeopaths perceive diseases as disordered states of this ‘vital force’, and
believe that it is only on the level of this ‘vital force’ that the cure of diseases might take place. From
the very onset, we have to adopt following fundamental factors as the basis of our intellectual
inquiry: 1. ‘Vital force’ exists only through ‘vital processes’, which are complex chains of molecular
level biochemical interactions purely material in nature. 2. A state of pathology is created by some
or other deviations happening in these biochemical processes due to molecular errors of pure
material nature. 3. Therapeutics is possible only through materialistic intervention in these
biochemical processes. 4. Medicines are the material means for such an intervention. 5. It is due to
the peculiar material properties of medicines that they are able to intervene in biochemical
processes. Therapeutics is a totally materialistic activity. If we do not agree upon at least this much
of fundamental propositions, no meaningful discussion will be possible regarding scientific
understanding homeopathy.

Damages Caused By Dynamism
According to 'classical' homeopathy, potentization is a process by which some mysterious 'dynamic
energy' is transferred from drug substance into the vehicle. They believe that due to the 'dynamic
drug energy' they carry, potentized drugs act upon the 'vital force', which is also 'dynamic'. As per
this 'spiritualistic' view, it is not possible to explain potentization as well as homeopathic cure in
terms of 'materialistic' science. Did you ever try to know what is exactly meant by ‘dynamic’? This
word comes from the metaphysical concept of ‘dynamism’. According to ‘dynamic’ view, interaction
between elements takes place without contact, through modes or even harmonics of motion,
yielding all phenomena in the Universe. Hahnemann’s explanations of homeopathy were obviously
influenced by the philosophy of ‘dynamism’. Modern proponents of ‘energy medicine’ theories also
explain homeopathy on the basis of concepts of ‘dynamism’. ‘Forces’ existing free from matter, and
‘matter acting at distances without any material contact or interaction’ is an idea very dear to all
practitioners of occult healing arts. The idea of a ‘medicinal force’ that can be ‘freed’ from drug
substance, and ‘transferred’ to water of sugar of milk, that can act on organism in ‘dynamic way’- all
these come from ‘dynamism’. Without freeing homeopathy from the influence of ‘dynamism’, we
cannot hope it to be accepted as a scientific medical system. The concept of ‘force’ used by
dynamic philosophy is entirely different from the concept of ‘force’ used in modern science.
'Dynamic' approach in homeopathy reflects a state of gross scientific ignorance. A total
lack of modern scientific understanding of physiology, pathology and therapeutics. Such an
unscientific approach could be propagated in this scientific era, only by our ‘classical homeopaths’

Historical Limitations Of Hahnemann& Homeopathy
*Limitations Imposed By 18th Century Knowledge Environment *Organon was first
published in 1810*Joseph Lister-1871 Describes Antibacterial properties of Penicillium
Fungus *Alexander Fleming Discovered Penicillin in 1928 *Luis Pasteur-1877 *Henry
Cavendish (1731 – 1810)discovered the composition of water *In 1811 the Italian
physician Amadeo Avogadro finally found the H2O formula for water *Proteins
Discovered in 1830 *In1912 Casimir Funk originally coined the term "vitamine“ * In 1833,
French chemist Anselme Payen first discovered an enzyme, diastase*Urea was
synthesised in 1828 by Friedrich Wohler and was the first organic compound to be
synthesised from inorganic starting materials *Genetics originated in 1866(Gregor
Johann Mendel ) *The Word Gene was Coined by Danish botanist Wilhelm Johannsen
in 1909

Need For Scientific Updating of Homeopathy
*Without updating, homeopathy is going to extinguish *Science is Dialectic- Not
Dogmatic *We cannot Claim Homeopathy is Medical Science if It is not continuously
updated incorporating new scientific knowledge *Updating means discarding old ideas
that are obsolete and imbibing new ideas *Update, theory, practice, methods and
educational system

Old 'Laws', 'Rules' And 'Methods' Would Go, And New
Ones Emerge, As Our Knowledge Advances
Once we acquire scientific knowledge regarding the exact processes involved in
potentization, active principles of potentized drugs and the molecular mechanism of their
therapeutic action, all the existing 'methods', 'laws', 'rules' and 'principles' are bound to
change. New 'principles' and 'methods‘ will evolve. 'Likes cures likes' and 'high dilution
effects' represent the objective part of homepathy, which are concerned with truthful
observations of natural phenomena involved in the process of 'cure'. This is the strong
and rational aspect of homeopathy that have to be preserved, explored and advanced
into more and more perfection. The theoretical explanatory part of homeopathy, which is
based on totally unscientific and irrational philosophy of 'dynamism' and 'vitalism' of
eighteenth century europe, as well as the 'rules', 'laws' and 'methods' formulated
accordingly, is the real stumbling block that prevents this wonderful therapeutic art from
advancing into a scientific medical system. We have to preserve and strengthen the
rational objective aspect of homeopathy, and explain it in terms of modern scientific
knowledge. We should show the audacity to discard its irrational and unscientific
theoretical parts

DAY ONE
LECTURE TWO
BEGINS

DAY ONE- LECTURE TWO- 2 hours
Life Is A Complex Chemical System
A ‘living organism’ is a highly organized complex material system with a specific quantity, quality,
structure and functions of its own, which is capable of self-controlled growth and reproduction of its
progeny, through an interaction involving constant exchange of matter and energy with its
environment. The phenomenon we call ‘life’ exists through a continuous chain of highly complex
biochemical interactions which control each other, depend up on each other and are determined by
each other. A ‘living organism’ represents a much higher and advanced level of organized existence
of the same elements of matter we meet in the inorganic world, different only in its structural
organization and functional complexity. In fact, ‘life’ is the result of a continuous evolutionary
process of primary matter in this universe through millions of years, attaining different levels of
organizational and functional forms. Primary forces, sub-atomic particles, elementary atoms, simple
chemical molecules, complex inorganic molecules, carbon containing organic molecules, bio-
molecules, complex bio-polymers, RNA-DNA-Protein structures, organelles, unicellular organisms,
multi-cellular organisms, diverse species of plants and animals, and ultimately Homo Sapiens-
these are the prominent milestones in the known evolutionary ladder on earth, panning through
millions and millions of years. Human beings represent the highest form of this material
evolutionary history on earth, as far as it is known to us.

Proteins- Molecular Carriers Of Life
Proteins are a class of highly complex nitrogen-containing bio-molecules, functioning as the primary
carriers of all the biochemical processes underlying the phenomenon of life. There exist millions of
protein molecules belonging to thousands of protein types in a living organism. Various proteins
play different types of roles, such as biological catalysts or enzymes, receptors, transport
molecules, hormones, antibodies etc. Some proteins function as specialized molecular switches,
systematically switching on and off of specific biochemical pathways. The most important factor we
have to understand while discussing proteins is the role of their three-dimensional spacial
organization evolving from peculiar disulphide bonds and hydrogen bonds. Whenever any kind of
error occurs in the particular three-dimensional structure of a given protein molecule, it obviously
fails to interact with other biomolecules to accomplish the specific functions it is intended to play in
the concerned biochemical processes. Such a failure leads to further harmful deviations in several
biochemical processes in the organism, that require the participation of this particular protein,
ultimately resulting in a cascading of multitude of molecular errors. This is the fundamental
molecular mechanism of pathology, which we perceive as disease of some or other category.
These deviations in biochemical pathways are expressed as various groups of subjective and
objective symptoms of disease.

Genetics & Dynamics Of Genetic Expressions
Different types of proteins are synthesized according to the requirements from the building blocks
known as amino acids, utilizing the genetic blueprint preserved in the DNA. ‘Genotype’ of an
organism is the inherited instructions it carries within its genetic code. Gene expression is the
process by which information from a gene is used in the synthesis of a functional gene product.
These products are often proteins, but in non-protein coding genes such as ribosomal RNA (rRNA),
transfer RNA (tRNA) or Small nuclear RNA (snRNA) genes, the product is a functional RNA. The
process of gene expression is used by all known life to generate the macromolecular machinery for
life. Several steps in the gene expression process may be modulated, including the transcription,
RNA splicing, translation, and post-translational modification of a protein. Gene regulation gives the
cell control over structure and function, and is the basis for cellular differentiation, morphogenesis
and the versatility and adaptability of any organism. Gene regulation may also serve as a substrate
for evolutionary change, since control of the timing, location, and amount of gene expression can
have a profound effect on the functions (actions) of the gene in a cell or in a multicellular organism.
Factors, such as such as miasmatic, environmental, nutritional, occupational, infectious, emotional,
ontogenic, metabolic and xenobiotic influence the process of ‘gene regulation’ at various stages of
‘gene expression’, through which the particular ‘phenotype’ or ‘constitution’ of the individual
organism is determined. As such, ‘constitution’ of an individual is the ‘phenotype’ determined by the
‘protein constitution’ developing through ‘genetic expression’’. Constitution’ is expressed in the form
of totality of general physical symptoms, morphology, mental symptoms and behavioral

Epigenetics
Epigenetics involves the study of CHANGES in GENETIC SUBSTANCE happening without any
change in DNA sequence. These changes are caused through DNA METHYLATION and HISTONE
MODIFICATION. They are normal processes that facilitates GENETIC EXPRESSION. Some
endogenous factors can influence the METHYL TRANSFERASE enzymes involved in this process,
there by producing ABNORMAL methylation of certain particular genes resulting in their silencing or
over activation. These ABNORMAL epigenetic changes play a role in cancers, and many
psychological problems. NEUROCHEMICALS generated as part of emotional processes also can
affect the ENZYMES involved in methylation of DNA and cause errors in genetic expressions. That
is the way EMOTIONS cause various disease conditions.When epigenetic changes happen in
SPERMS or OVUM, such changes will be inherited to the next generation. EPIGENETIC processes
play a big role in DISEASES that are not GENETIC, but related with errors in GENETIC
EXPRESSION. Epigenetics can explain why persons of similar genetic inheritance behave
differently, or get diseases differently. EPIGENETICS will help us in understanding the
BIOCHEMISTRY of PSYCHOSOMATIC DISEASES, and also how the EMOTIONAL
DISTURBANCES happened in parents affect the offsprings. NEUROCHEMICALS generated
as part of emotional processes also can affect the ENZYMES involved in methylation of
DNA and cause errors in genetic expressions. That is the way EMOTIONS cause
various disease conditions. When epigenetic changes happen in SPERMS or OVUM,
such changes will be inherited to the next generation.

Molecular Dynamics Of Disease
Disease is a state of derangement in biochemical interactions so as to disrupt the
normal pathways of vital processes of the organism. Almost all conditions of pathology
we normally confront, including those resulting from genetic origin, are involved with
some or other errors or absence of some protein molecules that are essential for
concerned biochemical processes. Moreover, most of such molecular errors other than
of nutritional deficiencies or genetic origin, arise due to binding of some exogenous or
endogenous foreign molecules or ions on the active, binding or allosteric sites of protein
molecules, effecting changes in their three-dimensional conformations. A host of
diseases originating from viral-bacterial infections, allergies, poisoning, drugs, food
articles etc, belong to this category. Chronic diseases caused by antibodies, which are
considered in homeopathy as miasmatic diseases and modern medicine as auto-
immune diseases, also belong to this class. Diseases caused by emotional factors,
hormones, neuro-mediators, neurotransmitters, cytokines, growth factors, super-oxides,
enzymes and various biological molecules also include in this group.

Key-Lock Mechanism Of Bio-molecular Interactions
On the surface of any bio-molecules belonging to protein category, with their characteristic three
dimensional organization, there will be different functional groups suitable for engaging in various
types of biochemical bonds. These functional groups belong mainly to two categories. Certain
functional groups play a role in establishing contacts between molecules, and are called ‘binding
groups’. Functional groups performing real chemical processes are known as ‘active groups’.
Different types of binding sites and active sites exist on the same complex bio-molecule. We can
compare these binding sites and the active sites of bio-molecules to the three dimensional key-
holes of ordinary mechanical locks, and their ligands to ‘keys’. A key will be suitable only to the
particular complimenting key- hole with exact three dimensional structure that fits to the shape of
the key. In the same manner, various molecules engaged in biochemical processes identifies and
interacts with their ligands with the help of peculiarities of their spacial configurations. A different
key, with a three dimensional structure only partially similar to that of the original key, may partially
enter in the key-hole, but it fails to open the lock, and results in mechanically obstructing the key-
hole. Molecular mechanism underlying a disease process may be broadly compared to such an
obstruction and inhibition of molecular locks by binding of some foreign molecules, partially similar
to but different from original ones mimicking as the real ligands. Due to such an inhibition, the
particular bio-molecule becomes incapable of interacting with its real molecular keys or ligands,
thereby hindering the concerned normal biochemical process. This situation amounts to a
pathology at molecular level.

Symptoms- Expressions Of Errors In Vital Processes
Symptoms are the subjective and objective expressions of errors in molecular processes happening
in a living system. Homeopathy considers “totality of symptoms” as the only clue to the
understanding of molecular level pathology, as well as deciding the appropriate therapeutic tools to
rectify that molecular errors. The subjective and objective symptoms presented by the organism are
the only reliable indicators to help us correctly understand the minute molecular deviations
underlying a state of pathology. Each group or train of symptoms represent a specific molecular
error that had occurred in a particular biochemical pathway. These symptoms invariably indicates
the specific type and character of the endogenic or exogenic foreign molecules or ions responsible
for the particular molecular inhibition. By studying the train of symptoms carefully and
systematically, homoeopaths are really observing these exact molecular inhibitions. This
symptomatology-based analytical method of homoeopathy is far more exact and superior to the
multitude of expensive complex laboratory chemical tests and imaging technologies we consider to
be scientific. Identifying the exact molecular errors in the organism of the patient by observing the
expressed symptoms, and identifying the most appropriate therapeutic agents from the similarity of
symptoms the drugs could produce in healthy organism- this is the scientific essence of “similia
similibus curentur”. “Similia similibus curentur” is a highly scientific principle of therapeutics,
deserving to be greatly honored by modern science at least in coming days.

EDEFINING FUNDAMENTALS
Drugs
Drugs are substances containing chemical molecules that can act upon pathogenic
molecules or biological target molecules and modify them. Drugs may be mineral,
vegetable, animal or synthetic origin. Constituent chemical molecules of a drug
substance interact with our body by binding their diverse types of ‘functional groups’ or
‘moieties’ with specific biological target molecules in our organism and modifying their
actions. This interaction is determined by conformational as well as charge affinities
between those functional groups and biological target molecules. It is the number of
types of biologically active ‘functional groups’ or ‘moieties’ available in a drug substance
that decides whether it is a ‘single’ drug or ‘multiple’ drug. Different types of ‘functional
groups’ of individual molecules contained in a drug substance bind to different biological
target molecules, and produce different types of modifications. It is this ‘modifying’ or
‘inhibitory’ actions that produce molecular states of pathologies during drug proving,
which are expressed through diverse types of subjective and objective symptoms.
Molecular Medicine studies drug substances in terms of their molecular level structure
and organization, and is more and more relying upon target-specific Designer Drugs
synthesized by drug designing technology, supported by computer aided designing
protocols. According to MIT view, drugs are of two classes- molecular drugs and

Mind & Body
The phenomena we call MIND never exist in the absence of a MATERIAL BODY, and a highly
complex central nervous system being part of that body. MIND does not exist free from the complex
biochemical molecular level interactions in the central nervous system, which actually represents
the highest stage of MATERIAL EVOLUTION on earth. MIND can be influenced by material
substances such as drugs, which can modify the biochemical processes in brain.Any mental activity
is related with production, transportation and interactions of some CHEMICAL molecules in the
body,that can influence the whole physiological processes in the organism. SENSATIONS,
EMOTIONS, COGNITION, MEDITATION, LEARNING, MEMORY, THOUGHTS,
CONSCIOUSNESS, MOODS, FEELINGS, DREAMS- every phenomena we associate with MIND
happen through BIOCHEMICAL PROCESSES in our nervous system. Some specific chemical
molecules are produced as part of those processes. Diverse factors can influence these complex
molecular biological processes in central nervous system, that we call psychological. They belong
to two classes- exogenous and endogenous. Endogenous factors include various hormones,
neurochemicals, neurotransmitters, metabolic byproducts, disease products, etc produced inside
the body and act upon central nervous system. Exogenous factors include, various chemical
molecules entering the body through food, medicines, drugs, radiations, as well as various sensory
signalsfrom the environment.
All these exogenous and endogenous factors act upon the biochemical molecules in the central
nervous system, produce effects we call MENTAL. Obviously, there is nothing ‘immaterial’ or

DAY TWO
LECTURE ONE
BEGINS

DAY TWO - LECTURE ONE- 2 hours
INTRODUCTION TO MIT CONCEPTS
Molecular Imprinting Technology
*Polymer Technology *MIP *Imprinting Protocol *Templates and Functional Monomers
*Host-Guest Interactions * Preparation of Artificial receptor sites Artificial Key holes for
Biological Ligands *Antibody mimics *Uses of MIPs *Molecular Separators *Chelating
Agents *Limitations of Molecular Imprinted Polymers in Therapeutics *MIPS are not
Biofriendly

Molecular Imprinted Polymers
'Molecular Imprinted Polymers' is an emerging branch of modern 'nanotechnology'. It is the
preparation of of artificial binding sites in polymer matrix utilizing 'guest-host' molecular
relationships. Knowing the principles and methods of this scientific technology is essential to follow
‘MIT' and its explanations of 'potentization' and 'similia similibus curentur'. ‘Molecular imprinting in
polymers’ is a fast growing research area that may be interesting to people engaged in developing
“drug designing” techniques. A lot of research is currently going on over this subject the world over.
This technolog...y involves the imprinting of synthetic polymer substances using enzymes or such
macromolecules as ‘guest’ molecules. As a result of imprinting, nano cavities with 3-d spacial
configurations complementary to the ‘guest’ molecules will be ‘engraved’ in the interaction surfaces
of the polymer matrix 'hosts'. These imprinted polymers, by virtue of the nanocavities they contain
can be used to bind molecules with configurational similarity to ‘guest’ molecules. They are at
present widely used in various laboratory assays as powerful adsorption surfaces and molecular
sensors. MIPs are also found to be of much practical use in various areas of science and
technology. Molecular imprinted polymers of today cannot be used as therapeutic agents, since
they are totally foreign substances to the organism. More over, native enzymes can not degrade the
polymers even if they can play a therapeutic role in the organism.

DAY TWO- LECTURE ONE- 2 hours
Supra-molecular Chemistry Of Water
Water is a solvent with higher polarity than similar liquids. H–O–H have bond angle of
105 degrees. That means, water molecule is a dipole. Because of this peculiarity, water
molecules can exist like a super-molecular network by forming hydrogen bonds between
themselves. A minimum number of five water molecules will be contained in this
network. Such five-molecule formations are called ‘pentamers’. Most of the wonderful
properties of water arise from this capacity of peculiar hydrogen bonding and supra-
molecular formations.
Water molecules are normally considered to be in a state of random movement in their
liquid form. But recent studies have shown that water molecules move not as individual
molecules, but as supramolecular clusters. We all know that water exists as ice crystals
in its solid form. But it has been recently observed that in its short range structure, water
exist as nanocrystals even in its liquid form. We know, water formed by melting of ice
behaves exactly as if in a state of liquid crystals. The lattice structure which is formed
through hydration bonds is responsible for this phenomenon.

Hydrogen Bonding
Essentially, ‘hydrogen bonding’ is a special type of dipole force. It is a force of attraction formed
between partially charged atoms being part of different molecules. The reason for this bonding is
the partial positive charge attained by hydrogen. Hydrogen is capable of establishing similar bonds
with the atoms of nitrogen, fluorine and oxygen. That is to say that the basis of hydrogen bonding is
the attraction between one hydrogen atom which is part of a molecule which is attached to oxygen
or nitrogen and oxygen or nitrogen which remains part of another molecule. This force is less
powerful than the covalent bonds which keeps the atoms inside molecule bound together. But it
may be strange that these less powerful bonds are responsible for the wonderful physico–chemical
properties and biological relevance of water. In the ordinary liquid state, in spite of 80% of the
electrons being engaged in bonding, the three atoms in water do not stay together, as the hydrogen
atoms are constantly exchanged between water molecules due to protonation/deprotonation
processes. Both acids and bases catalyze this exchange and even when at its slowest(at pH 7), the
average time for the atoms in an H2O molecule to stay together is only about a millisecond. As this
brief period is, however, much longer than the timescales encountered during investigations into
water’s hydrogen bonding or hydration properties, water is usually treated as a permanent
structure. But when water exist in its crystalline form, hydrogen atoms become more stable.

Supramolecular Properties of Ethanol
The presence of ethyl alcohol in water is considered as a factor reducing the rate of
protonation/deprotonation processes, thereby enhancing the stability of hydration shells.
Importance of using water-ethanol mixture for homeopathic potentization is self-explained. (CH3–
CH2 – OH ). The molecules of alcohol also have the dipole structure as water molecules. It is
possible for them to establish mutual connection through hydrogen bonding. The molecular weight
of alcohol molecule is 46. The molecular weight ofwater(H2O) is 18. That means that the number of
water molecules contained in 18 gram of water and the number of alcohol molecules contained in
46 gram of ethyl alcohol are equal. When alcohol and water are thoroughly mixed alcohol
molecules forms a network with water molecules through hydrogen bonds,The mobility of water
molecules is restricted by the bonds established with alcohol molecules. Hence, hydration shells
formed in alcohol–water mixture are comparatively more stable. The count of alcohol molecules
and the count of water molecules contained in their mixture in 73:27 ratio will be equal. (73% w/w.
alcohol and 27% w/w water). Medium used for homoeopathic potentization is a mixture containing
87% w/w of alcohol and 13% w/w of water. In this ratio, the number of alcohol molecules will be
about more than that of of water molecules. Rectified spirit is an azeotrope containing 95% alcohol
and 5%water. Such a ratio will be very suitable for the production of stable hydration shells.

What Happens During Potentization?
Evidently, potentization has two distinct phases, providing totally different outputs. Phase 1: First
stage of potentization involves division of complex drug molecules into simpler constituents. When
a medicinal substance is subjected to homeopathic potentization, if it is not soluble in water or
alcohol, it is first mixed with sugar of milk and subjected to repeated trituration. During the initial
stages of this process individual molecules contained in the medicinal substance are liberated from
their inter-molecular bonds, or ionized. Crude drug substance undergoes this division into individual
molecules and ions, due to the mechanism of violent trituration and shaking. Inter-molecular bonds
are broken, and the constituent molecules and ions are liberated. As a result, these ions and
molecules become more virulent, capable of exhibiting their interaction potentials to their full extent,
and become ready to undergo hydration in water-alcohol medium. Since the individual properties of
drug molecules come out in their totality, it is observed that even seemingly inert substances
become powerful drugs due to the division during first phase of potentization. Insoluble substances
thus become soluble in water. Phase II: Second stage of potentization involves actual hydration
and molecular imprinting of individual drug molecules and ions. This phase may be called
‘imprinting phase’. Molecules, ions and colloidal particles, liberated through the first phase
undergoes process of hydration and molecular imprinting in water- ethyl alcohol mixture during
second phase. Each individual molecule or ion is naturally subjected to hydration and molecular
imprinting, independently of others. Individual drug molecules act as ‘guest’ molecules in this
imprinting process.

Succussion And Cavitation
For preparing molecular imprints, we have to remove the drug molecules lying entrapped in the
medium as ‘guest-host complexes’, and make the hydration shells empty. Succussion or violent
shaking plays its role at this stage. Our scientific study regarding the role of ‘succussion’ or violent
shaking of drug solutions in the process potentization should begin with a deep study of
hydrodynamics of the phenomenon known as cavitation. Cavitation is the formation of bubble-like
gaps in a liquid. Mechanical forces, such as the moving blades of a ship’s propeller or sudden
negative changes in pressure, can cause cavitation. Violent shaking of fluids may cause cavitation.
Skimming or separating butter from milk by violent agitation is an example of practical utilization of
cavitation. Cavitation happening in solutions of very low dilutions due to violent shaking done during
homeopathic potentization will result in formation of nanobubbles. Due to hydrodynamic forces,
drug molecules entrapped in the hydration shells of of water-alcohol medium will be adsorbed into
the microfilms of nanobubbles. When the shaking is stopped and solution put to rest, these
nanobubbles, along with the drug molecules adsorbed into it, will rise to the top layer of the
solution. It will result in the removal of drug molecules from ‘host-guest’ complexes, leaving the free
hydration shells as ‘molecular imprints’ in the lower layers of the solution. By this process, drug
molecules begin to concentrate in top layers, and the number of drug molecules gradually
decreases in the lower layers of the solution. The upper layer that contains the remaining drug
molecules are transferred to next bottle for making next higher potencies, and will be utilized for
molecular imprinting the next bottle. As the serial dilution goes higher to approach Avogadro limit,
lower layers will become completely free of drug molecules,

Active Principles Of High Dilution Drugs Are Molecular
Imprinted Artificial Ligand Binds Or MIALBS
MIALBS are the Active Principles of Potentized Drugs *What are MIALBS? *Molecular
Imprinted Nanocavities *Artificial Ligand Binds *Artificial KeyHoles for Fake Keys Or
Pathogenic Agents *Conformational Affinity *Single Potentized Drug Contain Diverse
types of MIALBS *MIALBS cannot interact each other *MIALBS cannot interfere In The
Interaction Between Biological Targets and Their Natural Ligands *MIALBS cannot
produce any molecular inhibitions.

MIT Explanation Of Concept Of Similimum
The concept of ‘similimum’ can now be investigated here with a new scientific perspective. We have
seen during our earlier discussions, how the individual constituent molecules of a drug substance
introduced into the organism during drug proving creates molecular blocks, leading to inhibitions of
certain bio-chemic pathways, expressed by a specific train of subjective and objective symptoms.
These symptoms are called ‘drug symptoms’, and compiled in the materia medica of that particular
drug substance. When similar train of symptoms appears in an organism during a disease
condition, it means that, the pathological foreign molecules responsible for the disease has been
attacking same biological molecules, causing similar molecular blocks and bio-chemic inhibitions,
expressing similar subjective and objective symptoms. The fact that both drug molecules and
pathologic molecules could attack same biological molecules in an identical way, shows that the
drug molecules and pathologic molecules were having some factors(chemical groups) with similar
spacial conformations. Due to such a conformational similarity to the pathological molecules, the
‘molecular imprints’ of drug molecules contained in the potentized preparations will be having a
counteractive affinity towards the pathologic molecules. Due to the configurational affinity, these
molecular imprints or ‘MIALBS’ can selectively bind to the active groups of pathologic molecules,
when coming in their vicinity. This is the exact molecular kinetics of homeopathic therapeutics,
underlying the concept of SIMILIMUM and fundamental principle of ‘similia similibus curentur’.

Biological Mechanism Of Similia Similibus Curentur
Molecular imprints contained in Potentized homeopathic medicines, when introduced
into the organism by any route, is carried by the body fluids, and transported to different
parts of body by internal transport system. When the nanocavities of ‘molecular imprints’
contained these preparations come in the vicinity of active groups of pathological foreign
molecules, having similarity to the original ‘guest’ molecules used for imprinting, these
‘molecular imprints’ selectively bind to the pathological molecules due to conformational
affinity. By this process, pathological foreign molecules are prevented from binding to
biological molecules, thereby relieving the biological molecules from pathological
molecular blocks. This can be conceived as some sort of ‘molecular scavenging’ or
‘entrapping’ of pathological molecules, by ‘MIALBS’ or molecular imprints contained in
the potentized medicines.

INTRODUCITION TO MIT CONCEPTS
Scientific Proofs For MIT Concepts
Following observations justify the concept of MIT:
1. High dilution drugs really work as curative agents when applied according to the
principle 'similia similibus curentur'. 2. High dilution drugs works not only in living
bodies, but also up on ‘in vitro’ biological samples and molecules. 3. High dilution drugs
cannot interfere or prevent the normal interactions between biological molecules and
their natural ligands. 4. High dilution drugs can antidote the biological effects of same
drugs used in crude or molecular forms. 5. Biological properties of high dilution drugs
are directly opposite to those of same drugs in molecular forms. 6. High dilution drugs do
not contain original drug molecules. 7. High dilution drugs and unpotentized water-
alcohol mixture are similar in their chemical structure and properties. 8. High dilution
drugs differ from unpotentized water-alcohol mixture regarding physical properties and
various physical parameters. 9. High dilution drugs differ from unpotentized water-
alcohol mixture regarding supra-molecular arrangements by formation of nano-clusters
as has been reported to have observed by researchers in spectroscopic studies. 10.
Medicinal properties of high dilution drugs could be destroyed by applying strong heat,
electric currents or other forms of electromagnetic energy.

DAY TWO
LECTURE TWO
BEGINS

DAY TWO -LECTURE TWO- 2 hours
Miasms- Utter Confusion For All!
'Miasmatic analysis’ is the sum total of ‘confusions’ created in the minds of already
‘confused’ learners, by ‘teachers’ who are gravely ‘confused’ themselves. I never seen
two homeopaths agreeing up on ‘miasmatic analysis’ of same case, same symptom or
same medicine. Everybody talk differently. Once a case is presented to them, they
cannot avoid 'miasmatic analysis' of patients, drug substances or diseases. Instead of
discussing symptoms and similimum, they would go on talking about miasms. It is funny
to note that each ‘miasmatic expert’ would say there is no confusions if you understand it
correctly. Then he would give his theories and ‘miasmatic analysis’. Then the next expert
comes, and gives his theory and analysis, diametrically opposite to the earlier. He also
says there is no confusions if you understand him correctly. I have never seen two
‘miasmatic experts’ talking about miasms in similar language. You give them a case for
‘miasmatic analysis’. Each would come with different analysis.

DAY TWO- LECTURE TWO- 2 hours
Know How Hahnemann Evolved Concept Of Miasms
We should follow the exact thought process of Dr. Samuel Hahnemann through which
he finally arrived at his theory of ‘chronic diseases and miasms’. Imagine the
desperation and hopelessness Hahnemann experienced over the disappointing outcome
of chronic diseases treated on the basis of his original theory of ‘similia similibus
curentur’. Listen these words: “their beginning was promising, the continuation less
favorable, and the outcome hopeless.” Hahnemann confesses: “homeopathy failed to
bring a real cure in the above-mentioned diseases, and to gain an insight more nearly
correct and, if possible, quite correct, into the true nature of the thousands of chronic
diseases which still remain uncured, despite the incontestable truth of the Homoeopathic
Law of Cure, this very serious task has occupied me since the years 1816 and 1817,
night and day”.

Hahnemannian Concept Of Miasms
According to Hahnemann, the "miasm" of PSORA is the cause of a wide range of
chronic diseases. He explained PSORA as the residual chronic effects of INFECTIOUS
AGENTS OF ITCH. If anybody has least doubt whether or not hahnemann was talking
about the ‘miasm of psora’ as originating from ‘infection of itch disease’, kindly read this
part from ‘Chronic Diseases’-Para 37: “Psora (itch disease), like syphilis, is a miasmatic
chronic disease, and its original development is similar. The itch disease is, however,
also the most contagious of all chronic miasmata, far more infectious than the other two
chronic miasmata, the venereal chancre disease and the figwart disease”. “But the
miasma of the itch needs only to touch the general skin, especially with tender children”.

MIT Definition Of Miasms
Miasm is the chronic disease disposition caused by off-target residual actions of
antibodies generated against proteins alien to the genetic substance of the body such as
infectious agents, biological toxins, venoms, allergens, vaccines etc. Material carriers of
miasms are antibodies. This materialistic definition nullifies all existing ‘dynamic’
theorizations regarding miasms. Concept of miasm becomes scientific, with its inevitable
implications upon homeopathic practice.

How Many Miasms?
Once we understand the MIT definition of miasm is the chronic disease disposition
caused by off-target residual actions of antibodies generated against proteins alien to
the genetic substance of the body such as infectious agents, biological toxins, venoms,
allergens, vaccines etc, number of miasms actually becomes irrelevant. Any exogenous
or endogenous ALIEN PROTEIN entering the body may induce the production of
ANTIBODIES that may in the long run act as a NEW MIASM.

DAY TWO - LECTURE TWO- 2 hours
Constitutions- Genetic& Acquired
It would be more logical and scientific if we understand ‘constitution’ in terms of
‘genotypes’ and ‘phenotypes’ of individuals. According to modern genetics, the
‘genotype’ is the ‘genetic substance or ‘DNA’ inherited by the organism from its previous
generation. It is called the ‘genetic blue print’. The ‘genotype’ contained the organism
gives rise to individual ‘phenotypes through ‘gene expressions’. The ‘genetic code’
stored in DNA is interpreted by ‘gene expression’, and the properties of these
expressions five rise to the ‘phenotype’ of the organism. A ‘phenotype’ is the observable
characteristics or traits of an organism, such as morphology, development, biological
and physiological properties, behavior, and products of behavior. ‘Phenotype’ is the
result of ‘gene expressions’, which is decided by the interaction between genetic
substance and environmental factors.

‘Chronic’ and ‘Acute’ Approaches To Diseases
I think, terms CHRONIC and ACUTE do not denote any special character of a disease,
but it denotes physician's subjective APPROACH towards a case he is dealing with. A
physician can approach and deal with any case with a CHRONIC or ACUTE approach.
When physician tries to resolve only the most troublesome and immediate PARTICULAR
complaints of a case, disregarding its CONSTITUTIONAL aspects, it is an ACUTE
approach. When he tries to resolve the same case with full regard to its
CONSTITUTIONAL as well as PARTICULAR aspects, it is a CHRONIC approach. Way
of case taking, collection of symptoms, heirarchy of symptoms, weightage of symptoms,
way of selecting drugs, dosage, mode of administration- every thing changes depending
up on whether physician approaches the case as CHRONIC or ACUTE.

DAY TWO -LECTURE TWO- 2 hours
Nosodes, Sarcodes and Vaccines
NOSODES and SARCODES can play a major role in the management of CHRONIC diseases
caused by MIASMS. It will be interesting to study these homeopathic medicinal agents in
comparison with their allopathic counterpart, VACCINES. Potentized homeopathic nosodes
prepared from disease products are ‘molecular imprints’ in water-alcohol medium that can act
inside the organism in a similar way as ANTIBODIES do. They can act as PROPHYLACTICS by
binding to the invading pathogenic molecules and preventing them from attacking biological
molecules. Vaccines are disease products that can induce the organism to produce antibodies.
Exactly, antibodies are ‘molecular imprinted’ native proteins, especially globulins. Since antibodies
are ‘molecular imprinted proteins’, the can remain in the system very long periods, and attack the
surface proteins of invading microorganisms having configurational complementary relationship.
That way, vaccines builds up immunity against specific diseases. Same time, these antibodies can
cause various off-target molecular blocks, that my result in various pathological deviations known
as ‘side effects’. That means, antibodies can PRODUCE chronic ‘miasms’ also.

Auto Immune Diseases
All of us know, so-called ‘autoimmune diseases’ are caused by ‘antibodies’. But, those
‘antibodies’ are considered to be formed not against ‘exogenous antigens’, but
‘endogenous or host antigens’. If we explain ‘miasms’ as ‘antibodies’ formed against
‘exogenous’ proteins, should we exclude ‘autoimmune diseases’ from ‘miasms’, since
they are considered to be formed against ‘endogenous antigens’, not ‘exogenous
proteins’? Actually, are the antibodies considered to be the causative agents of
‘autoimmune diseases’ really formed against ‘host antigens’? Or, are they ‘antibodies’
formed against ‘exogenous proteins’ attacking ‘off-target’ sites in the organism?
According to MIT view, so called autoimmune diseases are actually caused by ‘off-target’
inhibitions created by ‘antibodies’ formed against ‘exogenous antigens’. If we carefully
study the modern hypotheses proposed by modern immunology, you will find that all
these hypotheses indirectly agree with our contention.

Diseases Caused By Deformed Proteins
TOXIC and PATHOGENIC properties of DEFORMED PROTEINS and their role as a
major class of pathogenic agents that cause most of the chronic diseases. If the three-
dimensional shape protein molecule is ‘deformed’ by any way, it becomes incapacitated
to perform its biological function, and may turn into pathogenic agents. Treating
DISEASE DISPOSITIONS caused by DEFORMED PROTEINS such as prion diseases,
Alzheimers, Parkinsons etc is a very difficult task even for MODERN MEDICINE. These
protein molecules do not undergo normal biological degrading or destruction. Chemical
drugs are no effective in most of such diseases. Homeopathy can treat chronic diseases
caused by DEFORMED PROTEINS by a process of Molecular Capping, which involves
deactivation of functional groups of DEFORMED PROTEINS using molecular imprints of
causative antibodies, thereby making them incapable of binding to biological molecules.
It will prevent deformed proteins from inducing misfolding in other similar proteins or
forming supra-molecular complexes by combining themselves.

Aging Is Chronic Accumulation Of Protein Errors
'Protein' damages as well as DNA damages happening in tissues of heart, central
nervous system, muscles, kidneys, liver, bones, lungs, pancreas, endocrine glands etc
play major roles in the advancement of ageing process. Various metabolic byproducts
such as free radicals, hormones, cytokines, antibodies, and various other endogenous
chemical molecules can act as contributing factors of 'protein damages'. nvironmental
pollutants, minerals, elements, chemicals, radiations, food articles, food additives, drugs,
infectious agents etc also play their roles in damaging 'proteins'. Since any 'disease' is
associated with some sorts of protein damages caused by exogenous or endogenous
pathogenic agents, in a broader perspective, 'ageing' also could be considered a
'chronic disease' at the molecular level . Process of ageing could be retarded through
homeopathic treatment, the same way as any chronic disease is treated.

DAY THREE
LECTURE ONE
BEGINS

DAY THREE- LECTURE ONE- 2 hours
PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS OF REDEFINING HOMEOPATHY
Confusions Regarding Drug Proving Resolved
Drug proving should be done using molecular forms. Molecular imprints contained in the
potentized homeopathic preparations cannot successfully compete with natural ligands
in binding with their biological target molecules, and hence, cannot interfere in the
interactions between biological molecules and their natural ligands. Obviously,
potentized drugs cannot produce any pathological molecular inhibitions in the organism
or produce symptoms. Drugs potentized above 12c cannot cause pathological molecular
inhibitions or produce symptoms. As such ‘drug proving’ with ‘high potencies’ is only a
myth- a false belief that is deep-rooted in the minds of homeopaths

DAY THREE - LECTURE ONE- 2 hours
Single Drug Vs Multiple Drugs
So-called single drugs are not actually single as we believe. They contain diverse types
of chemical molecules, which when introduced into the body acts on different targets.
Potentized forms of those drugs will naturally contain molecular imprints of all those
constituent molecules. Molecular imprints cannot interact each other, even if they come
from ‘single’ drug or ‘different’ drugs. As such, there is no any harm in combining two or
more drugs, if they are used in potentized forms above 12c

Single Dose Or Frequent Repetitions?
Many Excellent Prescriptions Spoiled By Our Hesitation To Repeat Doses When
Necessary. Molecular Imprints are the active principles of potentized drugs. These
'molecular imprints' bind to the pathological molecules having 'complementary'
configuration, there by relieving biological molecules from pathological inhibitions and
effect Cure. Same time, these 'molecular imprints' could be anti-doted or deactivated by
molecules or ions having complementary configurations. That means, 'molecular
imprints' we introduced into the body get deactivated by pathological molecules or other
molecules having conformational affinity. Molecules and ions of vegetable alkaloids,
enzymes, food additives, environmental toxins, infectious agents, bacterial-viral toxins
and a host of other agents may antidote these 'molecular imprints'. Hence, it is
necessary to replenish the supply of 'molecular imprints' at frequent intervals to ensure a
complete cure.

Drug Relationships
Potentized drugs cannot have any kind of drug relationships in between them. Molecular
forms and molecular imprinted forms of same or similar drugs can antidote each other.
Molecular forms of different drugs will have chemical interactions in between their
constituent molecules.

Antidoting
Potentized drugs cannot antidote another potentized drug. Molecular forms of drugs can
antidote potentized forms of same or similar drugs . Potentized of of drugs can antidote
molecular forms of same or similar drugs. Potentized camphor cannot antidote any other
potentized drug, but molecular camphor can potentized forms of drugs having similar
functional groups

Selection Of Potencies
Do not worry much about selection of potencies. Always use 12c-30c, until a better and
more accurate way of molecular imprinting is evolved. If your prescription does not act
properly or stop acting, and if you are sure you have selected correct similimum, use
same drug, same potency from another sample obtained from another source. Collect
maximum samples of 30c of same drug from different sources and mix them for better
therapeutic result. It would be an eye opening experience, that would compel you to look
into the whole 'potency question' from a different angle

Mother Tinctures & Low Potencies
Using Mother Tinctures and Low Potencies(below 12c) Cannot be Considered As
Genuine Homeopathic Practice. Since crude drugs and mother tinctures contain drug
molecules that can act upon biological molecules, they can also bind to various
biological targets in the organism. Obviously, there is always chance for creation of new
molecular inhibitions and drug-induced pathologies when we use crude drugs and
mother tinctures. That is the draw back of using mother tinctures even if they are
similimum. We must not forget that the symptomatologies provided in our materia
medica give the list of symptoms that can be generated in healthy persons by the use of
these drugs in crude form. Indiscriminate long-term use of mother tinctures containing
plant enzymes, poisonous alkaloids, glycosides and various other phytochemical
ingredients is an unpardonable crime even if it is done in the name of homeopathy.

Complementary Prescriptions
Any individual will be having diverse types of ‘molecular errors’ in him, with diverse types of
pathological conditions, expressed through different groups of subjective and objective symptoms.
A drug that contains maximum types of ‘molecular imprints’ matching to maximum types of
molecular errors in the organism is considered to be ‘most appropriate ‘similimum. No drug would
contain ‘all’ the molecular imprints required to rectify ‘all’ the molecular errors existing in a given
patient. Hence, any similimum we select would be only a ‘partial’ similimum for the patient.
Similimum we selected would remove only the molecular errors matching to the molecular imprints
contained in it, and hence, it would offer only partial cure. For a ‘total’ cure, we will have to select
additional drugs that would contain molecular imprints matching to the remaining molecular errors,
which could be selected on the basis of symptoms that are not covered by the first similimum.
There is no need of any kind of restrictions for the number of ‘complementary prescriptions’. If the
first ‘complementary prescription’ is not enough to complete the cure, we can look for a second
‘complementary prescription’ on the basis of remaining symptoms. We can ensure ‘total cure’ for
the patient through systematic application of this ‘complementary prescription’ method. Whether the
‘complementary prescriptions’ are applied along with or after the first prescription, could be decided
by the physician according to his perceptions

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS OF EDEFINING HOMEOPATHY
Homeopathic Aggravations
Once you understand Molecular Imprints Therapeutics, you will realize that there is no chance of
so-called aggravations, suppressions, provings or any other harm even if ‘wrong’ drug, ‘wrong’
potency or ‘untimely repetitions’ are used, if you are using only ‘molecular imprints’ forms of drugs.
An individual will be having multitudes of ‘molecular errors’ caused by binding of diverse types of
pathogenic molecules on different biological molecules. Each individual ‘molecular error’ may be
expressed in the form of specific subjective and objective ‘symptom complexes’. If we select a drug
as a similimum on the basis of some of the leading symptoms only, ignoring other symptoms, that
similimum in fact covers only some of the molecular errors. The ‘molecular imprints’ contained in
that similimum may remove those molecular errors only. But other molecular errors remain. The
‘symptom complexes’ representing those remaining molecular errors would become more
expressive and come to the fore. In the absence of scientific understanding regarding the molecular
processes behind this phenomenon, we happen to interpret these new expressions as
‘homeopathic aggravation’.

Fear of Suppressions
Fear of ‘suppression of disease’ that may happen from ‘improper’ use of homeopathic
drugs is the most prominent symptom of any ‘classical homeopath’, which indicates
severe deficiency of scientific knowledge regarding the biochemistry of life, disease and
cure. This ‘phobia’ is ‘inherited’ through generations of homeopaths, from ‘teachers’ to
‘students’, and ‘gurus’ to ‘disciples’. Modern ‘Gurus’ spin fanciful ‘theories of
suppressions’, write and sell heavy books on their ‘theories’, and fly around the globe to
conduct ‘expensive’ seminars to ‘educate’ the homeopathic community for the sole
purpose of saving humanity from grave dangers imposed by homeopathic
‘suppressions’.

Hering’s Laws Of Directions of Cure
When we go deeper into the history of homeopathy, it would be clear that there was no any mention
of such ‘hering laws’ in the works of even Hering or his contemporaries. Actually, it was the
‘observation’ made by ahnemann that curative process has some ‘order’, but he never called it a
law. Hering has mentioned in his earlier works about ahnemann’s ‘four observations regarding
order of cure’, but finally in 1875 he wrote only about a single direction of cure: ‘in the reverse
direction of disease process’. He never called it or expected to be known as ‘herings laws’. None of
his famous contemporaries and close colleagues ever discussed or made any reference to a law of
direction of cure. Writings of Boenninghausen, Jahr, Joslin, P.P. Wells, Lippe, H.N.Guernsey,
Dunham, E.A. Farrington, H.C. Allen, Nash, etc, were all silent. It was ‘KENT’ who later actually
called it ‘Herings laws’ and converted these four observations into ‘fundamental laws’ of
homeopathic cure. He taught to understand and apply these ‘laws’ in a mechanical way. He taught
homeopaths to consider ‘hering laws’ regarding ‘directions of cure’ as one of the ‘fundamental laws’
of homeopathy, similar to ‘similia similibus curentur’.

 Total Cure Prescriptions
'Total Cure Prescriptions' is an innovation in homeopathic practice, which enables
homeopaths to generate wonderful sure-shot customized prescriptions that would offer
‘rapid, permanent and total cure’ for their patients. Total Cure Prescriptions' addresses
not any individual diseases presented by the patient, but ALL his diseases that may be
due to diverse miasmatic, genetic, infectious, environmental, ontogenic, metabolic,
emotional or nutritional causes. All in a single go!
A 'TOTAL CURE PRESCRIPTION' is a prescription that is expected to contain ALL the
diverse types of 'molecular imprints' required to remove ALL the diverse types of
molecular inhibitions existing in the patient, thereby offering a TOTAL CURE.

 Ligand Based Prescriptions
*Homeopathy will no more be symptom-based only *Ligand-based prescriptions will
become more common *For that, homeopaths will have to update their biochemistry
regularly *New ligand-based drugs will also evolve.

 Anti-miasmatic Prescriptions
*MIT understanding of miasms will lead to novel anti-miasmatic prescriptions as part of
regular prescriptions *History of infections, allergies, vaccinations, and anaphylaxis will
form the basis of anti-miasmatic prescriptions *Nosodes will be used more frequently,
and new nosodes will emerge *New treatments will evolve for various Proteinopathies,
auto-immune diseases, aging etc

 Techno Intelligent Method Of Prescribing
*New Methods of practice will emerge from Scientific Redefining of Homeopathy
*Symptom-based approach will gradually advance into a method of prescribing based on
knowledge of ligand-target interactions involved in each disease conditions *MIT
understanding of MIASMs will lead to novel ways of prescribing *New computer
programs for practicing will evolve

DAY THREE
LECTURE TWO
BEGINS

DAY THREE -LECTURE TWO- 2 hours
LOOKING INTO FUTURE
Converging of Medical Systems
*Modern molecular medicine and homeopathy will converge into a single system of
Molecular Imprinted Medicine *Homeopathy will evolve from ‘symptom-based’ medicine
to ‘ligand-based’ medicine *Molecular forms of drugs will gradually disappear *Drug
diseases and Iatrogenic diseases will disappear.

DAY THREE - LECTURE TWO- 2 hours
LOOKING INTO FUTURE
Computer Aided Molecular Imprinted Drug Designs
*New Computer Technologies Could be evolved for designing and preparing target-
specific MIALBS *Ligand-based and Target-based approaches are possible in computer
aided designing of MIALBS

LOOKING INTO FUTURE
Molecular Imprinted Biological Ligands
*A whole ne range of target-specific MIALBS could be developed through molecular
imprinting using biological ligands as well as pathogenic molecules as templates *This
new class of MIALB drugs will gradually replace the existing drugs. *Current vaccines
will be replaced by 100% safe prophylactic MIALBS

LOOKING INTO FUTURE
Evolving New Molecular Imprinting Techniques For
Drug Designing
*Potentization is a very crude and primitive form of Molecular Imprinting which gives only
random results *We need to evolve new sophisticated technology and devices for better
and accurate molecular imprinting *We need to develop technology to identify
individual molecular imprints and ensure their quality

LOOKING INTO FUTURE
Impact Of MIALBS On Pharmaceutical Industry
*Pharmaceutical Industry will be forced to shift their focus to developing new MIALB
Drugs *Drug Patenting will gradually disappear *Cost of Drugs will drastically come
down *Since MIALBS will not produce drug diseases, Pharmaceutical sales will
gradually come down *This may affect the whole Medical industry *But it will be good for
common man *Open Pharma Projects will lead the pharmaceutical Research and
Industry

THE END
THANK YOU!

REDEFINING HOMEOPATHY PRESENTATION

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to REDEFINING HOMEOPATHY PRESENTATION

Similar to REDEFINING HOMEOPATHY PRESENTATION (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

REDEFINING HOMEOPATHY PRESENTATION