We conducted a post-production questionnaire and focus group to evaluate our documentary, magazine spread, and radio trailer. The questionnaire responses showed that respondents felt the documentary and magazine were professionally produced and caught their attention. However, they noted issues with the sound levels in the documentary. In the focus group, we discussed potential improvements but overall found that the audience feedback helped us create appealing media products for our target demographic.

2. What did we do?
We have used audience feedback from the start in order to make our media outcomes. We have made
previous questionnaires in order to gain the opinion of the audience as well as asking class members
of views and opinions whilst in the procedure making technique decisions.It allowed us to gain
understanding for the target audience and there opinions and adapting our ideas to suit the criteria of
the target audience viewing the documentary itself.By asking questions such as “Do you think people
with tattoo/body piercings should be discriminated against?” allowed us to portray a realistic argument
for the discrimination of body modification and influenced statics and facts of which we included during
the documentary.
Therefore in order to evaluate all three of our media products( Documentary, double page spread and
radio trailer) we conducted a post production questionnaire as well as focus group. We selected the
same people as who had been targeted as our audience influenced by the outcome of the prior
questionnaire. This means the high majority were between the ages of 18- 25 years old of whom
completed the questionnaire outcomes. We asked them to complete this honestly so that we could
gain the most accurate opinion to compare to that of ours.

3. 1)The documentary looked
professional.
0
2
4
6
8
10
People we asked
With the all of our audience agreeing or strongly agreeing with the statement it proves that
the majority of people feel the documentary looks professional. I think this is down mainly to
The length of time spent on editing the overall documentary and reflecting I think without
it wouldn’t of looked as professional. Other aspects also contributed to this such as us
re-filming shots as they weren't up to the standard we wanted for our overall documentary
and these sort of techniqual decisions have led to this ‘professional’ outcome.

4. 2)I learnt a lot from the
documentary.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
This static to me reassures me that we definitely made the correct decision in filming topic.
Keeping the audience interested and excited about the documentary was our main aim as we
Only have the first 5 minutes to film of which would be to entice the viewer to watch the rest.
Personally I thought the topic was interesting and I found out facts and new information of
which I didn't know before starting the topic and therefore I am not surprised the audience also
thought this of a learning experience.

5. 3) The music positively added to
the documentary.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
I though that the music was one of the key contributors of the documentaries effectiveness.
Personally, I think the music added rhythm and pace as well as effectively suited the
documentaries style and audience. As the people of whom answered the questionnaire were the
target audiences. This proves that they are also of the same opinion.

6. 4)The quality of the sound levels
were excellent.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Strongly
Agree
Agree Disagree Strongly
Disagree
Here I was surprised with the negative result with the majority of the precipitants disagrees
With the sound levels. However, whilst watching the documentary we did realize that a
Corruption had meant that the final editing of the sound had not been exported. Even thou these
Results our now invalid as we have reported are final product it allowed us to identify
The problem before the examiner.

7. 5) The voiceover was informative.
0
2
4
6
8
Strongly
Agree
Agree Disagree Strongly
Disagree
Series 1
Column1
Column2
From the audiences opinion they also agree that the voiceover was a strong feature to our
Documentary. With the majority agreeing or strongly agreeing I think it proves that the
Documentary comes together well. Is the voiceover was informative it obviously fits with the
Visual aspect.

8. 6) The radio trailer effectively promoted the documentary e.g.
fitted with the style of the documentary.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disgree
Strongly
Disagree
Here the majority strongly agree. The technique of using the same voiceover and snippets
From the documentary clearly proved effectively as a strong link has been made.
This reflects the research aspect we have done into previous radio trailers and this had therefore
paid off.

9. 7) The radio trailer sounded
professional.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Strongly
Agree
Agree Disagree Strongly
Disgree
Series 1
Column1
Column2
The radio trailer was highly effectively I thought for the promotion of our documentary.
The audience we asked either agreed or strongly agreed proving positive.
Reflecting I think the radio trailer could be improved within sound levels and quality of clips used.
This would be done if there was more time.

10. 8) The snippets from the
documentary were appropriate.
0
2
4
6
8
10
Strongly
Agree
Agree Disgree Strongly
Disagree
Within our radio trailer we tried to use ambiguous quotes from our documentary therefore
Drawing in audience as they question or are interested within the basis of the magazine. As
A group we did struggle to pick quotes from the documentary to use in our piece within
The making we felt the majority didn’t directly link. However, with the overall majority
‘strongly agreeing’ that the clips were appropriate I think this shows a positive outcome to
the radio trailer

11. 9)The magazine effectively promoted the documentary e.g. fits with the
style of the other media products.
0 2 4 6 8 10
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Here the majority of people strongly agree with the statement the magazine fitted the
Other products. I think the magazine house style perfectly suited the promotion and therefore
Linked with both. We clearly stated the name of the documentary and date and time therefore
I am not surprised that the audience also felt the same way.

12. 10) The magazine is aesthetically pleasing and catches the attention of
the audience.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
I think the outcome simply proves that the magazine is effective. From researching other
Magazines eye catching was the one thing we strived for as it would draw the audience. This
Therefore communicates that we have achieved our goals within making the magazine.

13. 11) Nothing could be improved for any
of the three media products.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Strongly
Agree
Agree Disagree Strongly
Disagree
Here 2 people said that they strongly agree that nothing could be improved. However reflecting
I also think aspects could be improved. This could be seen as inaccurate as explained with
Question 4. This may therefore reflect a different outcome as for my time watching the
documentary with the target audience I also thought that the sound levels for the documentary
were the main problem from the three media products.

14. Questionnaire quotes:
“The sound level was too different in places”
“I though the topic was really interesting”
“It looked really professional”
“Id want to watch the rest of the documentary”
“Eye catching magazine”

15. Focus Group:

16. Conclusion:
Overall through the course of the media project I feel that
audience feedback has been a successful part of
appealing to are target audience. I have learnt various
things throughout the audience feedback. We have been
able to learn throughout the entire course from research
and planning to our final project. Overall our findings
prove that we have created a well constructed
documentary, magazine and radio trailer. We were
positively cruised upon the sound levels however we then
also realized this is a invalid result. The audience
feedback as allowed my to adapt my opinions throughout
this project and learn new things within this.