Here are a few key points to situate RtI within the broader school improvement process:
- Identify existing or past efforts and how RtI can build upon and complement those initiatives rather than be an add-on or separate initiative. Look for natural linkages and alignments.
- Involve administrators, teachers, support staff, parents and students in the planning and implementation process to gain buy-in, leverage expertise, and ensure adequate resources and scheduling.
- Use student performance data to identify common needs school-wide and prescribe evidence-based interventions at appropriate tiered levels for all students.
- Monitor progress regularly to evaluate impact and adjust supports as needed. Support teachers with professional learning, materials and time for
This document provides an overview of sample items and performance tasks from the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. It discusses the purpose and features of the sample items, how to navigate the sample item website, and the content claims and item types for the English Language Arts and Mathematics assessments. Timelines for the Smarter Balanced assessment system are also presented, as well as resources for reviewing sample items and getting support.
The document provides strategic objectives and descriptions for the Good Spirit School Division. It outlines four key objectives for improving student learning outcomes, well-being, engagement, and supports. It also describes four initiatives for strengthening instruction, enhancing business processes, improving communication, and effective change management. Each objective and initiative includes intended results and potential measures to track progress.
Promoting & researching adaptive regulation: Successes, challenges & possibil...Mariel Miller
Hadwin (2012). Promoting & researching adaptive regulation: Successes, challenges & possibilities
Presented at the 2012 annual conference for the Canadian Society for the Study of Education (CSSE), Waterloo, ON.
The document shows a performance gap between students' literacy skills and the demands of school that widens each year from 5th to 9th grade. It asks five questions about current literacy supports to determine what is in place to ensure students learn critical content, are taught learning strategies, and receive intervention based on their specific needs. Finally, it outlines using a content literacy framework to develop a tiered action plan with enhanced core instruction, embedded strategy teaching, and intensive interventions for struggling students.
This document outlines four performance standards for evaluating an educator. Performance Standard 1 focuses on creating a positive learning environment. The educator demonstrates strengths in managing learning space, learner involvement, discipline, and diversity. Performance Standard 2 focuses on knowledge of curriculum and learning programs. The educator shows strengths in knowledge of learning areas, skills, goal setting, and involvement in learning programs. Performance Standard 3 focuses on lesson planning, preparation, and presentation. The educator's strengths include well-prepared lesson plans, clear presentation, record keeping, and managing learning programs. Performance Standard 4 focuses on learner assessment and achievement. Overall, the educator meets or exceeds expectations across the four performance standards.
1. Mrs. Pouchot analyzed benchmark data for her 4th grade class and identified several students needing intervention in key standards across reading comprehension, word analysis, writing strategies, and language conventions.
2. Most students struggled with writing strategies standards like W1.2a and W1.2b. The areas with the most student success were reading comprehension standard R2.7 and writing standards W1.10 and W1.5.
3. Mrs. Pouchot's action plan includes interventions like Read 180, small group instruction, and a reading intervention program to support struggling students. The reading teacher and special education teacher will provide additional support. Progress will be monitored on
Since 1959, ACT has collected and reported data on students’ academic readiness for college—both nationally and state specific. Preparing for college and career is a process that occurs throughout elementary and secondary education. Measuring academic performance over time provides meaningful and compelling information about the college readiness of students. ACT research also shows that certain nonacademic factors can play a role in student college success. Learn what to look for beyond GPA and test scores to predict the greatest likelihood of college success.
This document provides an overview of sample items and performance tasks from the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. It discusses the purpose and features of the sample items, how to navigate the sample item website, and the content claims and item types for the English Language Arts and Mathematics assessments. Timelines for the Smarter Balanced assessment system are also presented, as well as resources for reviewing sample items and getting support.
The document provides strategic objectives and descriptions for the Good Spirit School Division. It outlines four key objectives for improving student learning outcomes, well-being, engagement, and supports. It also describes four initiatives for strengthening instruction, enhancing business processes, improving communication, and effective change management. Each objective and initiative includes intended results and potential measures to track progress.
Promoting & researching adaptive regulation: Successes, challenges & possibil...Mariel Miller
Hadwin (2012). Promoting & researching adaptive regulation: Successes, challenges & possibilities
Presented at the 2012 annual conference for the Canadian Society for the Study of Education (CSSE), Waterloo, ON.
The document shows a performance gap between students' literacy skills and the demands of school that widens each year from 5th to 9th grade. It asks five questions about current literacy supports to determine what is in place to ensure students learn critical content, are taught learning strategies, and receive intervention based on their specific needs. Finally, it outlines using a content literacy framework to develop a tiered action plan with enhanced core instruction, embedded strategy teaching, and intensive interventions for struggling students.
This document outlines four performance standards for evaluating an educator. Performance Standard 1 focuses on creating a positive learning environment. The educator demonstrates strengths in managing learning space, learner involvement, discipline, and diversity. Performance Standard 2 focuses on knowledge of curriculum and learning programs. The educator shows strengths in knowledge of learning areas, skills, goal setting, and involvement in learning programs. Performance Standard 3 focuses on lesson planning, preparation, and presentation. The educator's strengths include well-prepared lesson plans, clear presentation, record keeping, and managing learning programs. Performance Standard 4 focuses on learner assessment and achievement. Overall, the educator meets or exceeds expectations across the four performance standards.
1. Mrs. Pouchot analyzed benchmark data for her 4th grade class and identified several students needing intervention in key standards across reading comprehension, word analysis, writing strategies, and language conventions.
2. Most students struggled with writing strategies standards like W1.2a and W1.2b. The areas with the most student success were reading comprehension standard R2.7 and writing standards W1.10 and W1.5.
3. Mrs. Pouchot's action plan includes interventions like Read 180, small group instruction, and a reading intervention program to support struggling students. The reading teacher and special education teacher will provide additional support. Progress will be monitored on
Since 1959, ACT has collected and reported data on students’ academic readiness for college—both nationally and state specific. Preparing for college and career is a process that occurs throughout elementary and secondary education. Measuring academic performance over time provides meaningful and compelling information about the college readiness of students. ACT research also shows that certain nonacademic factors can play a role in student college success. Learn what to look for beyond GPA and test scores to predict the greatest likelihood of college success.
This document discusses how autism spectrum disorders affect writing skills. It begins by outlining how the session will examine both positive and negative impacts on writing as well as methods to improve student motivation and engagement. It then provides examples of common autism traits and how they manifest differently depending on the individual. The main topics are defined as effects on writing, improving motivation, and engagement. Specific challenges with writing are outlined along with strategies to utilize student strengths to address challenges. Accommodations for fine motor difficulties and theory of mind issues are also discussed. The document concludes by emphasizing that behaviors communicate an underlying reason and need to be addressed through assessment and strategies.
The document discusses the FLIRT acronym and what each letter stands for in reading a text. It explains that FLIRT stands for Find the form, Look at text features, Identify connections, Reveal the purpose, and Transfer to organizer. It describes what each step of FLIRT means and how it helps a reader understand and organize a text.
This document provides criteria for placing 2nd and 3rd grade students in intervention groups. For 2nd grade, students are eligible if they score low on 6 of 8 indicators measuring reading accuracy, comprehension, writing, and instructional level. For 3rd grade, criteria include a high accuracy but low words correct per minute (WCPM) score, high accuracy but low comprehension, or low instructional level and accuracy. Assessment data is collected throughout the year to monitor student progress.
Reciprocal teaching (RT) is a scaffolded discussion technique that uses four comprehension strategies - predicting, clarifying, questioning, and summarizing - to improve reading comprehension. Research shows that RT significantly improves students' reading comprehension test scores when implemented consistently. The document provides guidance on how to implement RT in classrooms at all grade levels, including connecting it to RTI frameworks through different tiers of instruction.
Reciprocal teaching (RT) is a reading comprehension strategy that involves modeling and scaffolding four strategies: predicting, clarifying, questioning, and summarizing. Research shows that RT improves students' reading comprehension test scores when implemented for 15-20 days. It is effective across grade levels and can be used in whole group, small group, and individual settings. The strategies are introduced individually with modeling and thinking aloud before students apply them during guided and independent reading.
This document discusses effective teaching strategies for reading nonfiction text. It introduces the Talking-To-The-Text (TTTT) strategy where students think out loud by writing comments in the text margins. Summarization is also covered, including having students write 25-word abstract summaries, which many struggle with. The White-out Detective method is presented where key vocabulary is covered up to help students with vocabulary and comprehension. The document emphasizes making expectations clear, convincing students strategies work, and choosing a "go-to" strategy to use consistently.
This document discusses effective teaching strategies for reading nonfiction text. It introduces the Talking-To-The-Text (TTTT) strategy where students think out loud by writing comments in the text margins. Summarization is also covered, including having students write 25-word abstract summaries, which many struggle with. The White-out Detective method is presented where key vocabulary is covered up for students to uncover. The document emphasizes making expectations clear, convincing students strategies work, and choosing a go-to strategy for consistency.
This document discusses engaging secondary learners and provides strategies to increase student engagement. It defines student engagement as students making a psychological investment in learning and trying hard to understand material. Five levels of engagement are identified: engagement, strategic compliance, ritual compliance, retreatism, and rebellion. Ideas for measuring and increasing engagement include asking students questions, effective classroom management, opportunities for student response, and varied teaching strategies. The goal is for students to be meaningfully involved in learning.
The document discusses the role of proficiency-based teaching and learning where a proficiency teacher guarantees that every student is learning and progressing. It introduces Steve Boynton, Superintendent of Arlington School District, and Rinda Montgomery Conwell, Assistant Superintendent of North Central ESD, who discuss proficiency-based models. The document then outlines various questions and details about defining proficiency, the Arlington proficiency model, and how to build a proficiency model in a school over the course of a year.
R U Ready for the Common Core?
Common Core is coming…are you, your teachers and your students ready? What goals will you need to target for student comprehension of the new standards? This session will demonstrate a web-based program and will discuss ways to utilize the results for more effective and efficient planning for Common Core.
Marlyn Smith & Pam Daniels
Curriculum Associates
ReviewThere are 13 categories of special education as define.docxronak56
Review
There are 13 categories of special education as defined by the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). In order to
qualify for special education, the IEP team must determine that a
child has one of the following:
• Autism
• Blindness
• Deafness
• Emotional Disturbance
• Hearing Impairment
• Intellectual Disability
• Multiple Disabilities
• Orthopedic Impairment
• Other Health Impaired
• Specific Learning Disability
• Speech or Language Impairment
• Traumatic Brain Injury
• Visual Impairment
SLDs Seen Most Often in
School:
-Written expression (language)
-Math calculation
-Math problem solving
-Reading fluency
-Reading comprehension
TOPICS:
Response to Instruction and
Intervention (RTII)
Multi-Tiered Systems of Support
(MTSS)
The Discrepancy Model
Progression
Response
to
Intervention
Response
to
Instruction
and
Intervention
Multi-Tiered
Instruction
and
Support
Response to Instruction and
Intervention
• RTIII is the practice of (1) providing high-
quality instruction/intervention matched to
student needs and (2) using learning rate
over time and level of performance to (3)
make important educational decisions.
(Batsche, et al., 2005)
• Uses problem-solving to develop effective
instruction/interventions.
5
1. Criterion-Referenced Benchmark
The benchmark represents a level of proficiency needed for
later school success. A good example of a commonly used
set of benchmarks for reading are those that were
developed for use with the DIBELS [Dynamic Indicators of
Basic Early Literacy Skills].
Using the DIBELS benchmarks, for example, 3rd-grade
students are at ‘low risk’ for reading problems if they reach
these reading-fluency goals:
– Start of School Year: 77 Correctly Read Words Per Min
– Middle of School Year: 92 Correctly Read Words Per Min
– End of School Year: 110 Correctly Read Words Per Min
6
2. Determine the likely reason(s) for the
student’s depressed academic
performance:
There can be several possible underlying reasons why
a student is doing poorly in an academic area. It is
crucial to determine the reason(s) for poor
performance in order to select an appropriate
intervention:
• Skill Deficit: The student lacks the necessary skills to
perform the academic task.
• ‘Fragile’ Skills: The student possesses the necessary
skills but is not yet fluent and automatic in those skills.
• Performance (Motivation) Deficit: The student has
the necessary skills but lacks the motivation to
complete the academic task.
7
3. Select a scientifically-based intervention
likely to improve the student's academic
functioning:
Any intervention idea chosen for the student
should be backed by scientific research (e.g.,
research articles in peer-reviewed professional
journals) demonstrating that the intervention is
effective in addressing the student’s
underlying reason(s) for academic failure.
8
4. Monitor academic progress frequently to
evaluate the impact ...
This document summarizes the findings of a study on the Extended Tutorial Center (ETC) program at a community college. The ETC program provides group study sessions for courses with high proportions of basic skills students. The summary shows that students participating in the ETC program had higher rates of retention, passing grades, and overall GPA compared to non-participating students in the same courses. The ETC program has grown significantly in attendance and number of courses supported. The document concludes that the ETC program increases student success rates.
KIRKPATRICK MODEL OF EVALUATION (LEO CHANDRA)vina serevina
The document discusses the Kirkpatrick (1994) model of evaluation, which consists of 4 levels - reaction, learning, behavior, and results. Level 1 measures participants' reactions to a training program. Level 2 assesses what participants learned. Level 3 looks at whether participants apply the new knowledge and skills on the job. Level 4 examines the overall impact on the organization in terms of outcomes like pass rates, GPA, retention rates, and satisfaction. The model provides a framework for conducting comprehensive evaluations of educational programs and their effects.
The document outlines a district's vision, mission, goals and strategies for improving student achievement and outcomes. The key points are:
- The district's vision is to establish a world-class, student-focused learning system where all students meet or exceed high standards.
- The district's goal and theory of action focus on engaging all staff in high-quality teaching and learning through strengthening the "instructional core" of teacher skills, rigorous content, and student engagement.
- The district will implement strategies such as professional learning communities, instructional coaching, integrating technology, and differentiated instruction to improve the instructional core.
- School goals and plans will align with the district's vision and be supported by district
The Drop-out Reduction Program (DORP) is an intervention program implemented in Philippine schools to reduce high dropout rates and improve learning outcomes. It aims to ensure every Filipino has access to quality basic education. Specific objectives include reducing and eliminating school dropout, increasing retention and achievement for students at risk of dropping out. The program utilizes formal, non-formal and informal approaches and components include the Open High School Program, Effective Alternative Secondary Education, and School Initiated Interventions. Critical factors for successful implementation include committed leadership, trained implementers, availability of materials, and stakeholder participation and support.
RTI is a multi-tiered approach to providing high-quality instruction and interventions matched to student needs through frequent progress monitoring and data-informed decisions. It involves three tiers of increasingly intensive instruction, with 80% of students receiving core instruction in Tier I, 15% receiving targeted interventions in Tier 2, and 5% receiving intensive interventions in Tier 3. The classroom teacher's role includes universal screening, differentiating Tier I instruction, monitoring student progress, implementing Tier 2 interventions, and collaborating within the problem-solving team on intervention planning and student progress.
The document outlines an assessment plan for an exceptional education program that focuses on developing skills through program tasks, data-driven intervention plans, and end assessments. The plan aims to ensure candidates can effectively develop IEPs, collaborate with others, support student behavior and learning, use assistive technologies, and apply instructional and ethical practices through embedded learning experiences. Faculty will implement observation protocols and provide feedback to help candidates improve. The goal is to produce special education teachers who are well-prepared to meet student needs.
This document provides an overview of a leadership and management module presented by Dr. Muavia Gallie on March 27, 2010. The content includes an introduction, reflection on homework, curriculum management, instructional management, and conclusion. Key terms related to outcomes-based education are defined. OBE systems design is discussed, including curriculum design, teaching practices, assessment, placement of learners, and school organization. Components of school readiness are outlined on a spectrum from dysfunctional to functional.
The document summarizes key points from a Department of Education order on classroom assessment policies for K-12 basic education in the Philippines. It outlines two types of classroom assessment: formative assessment, which occurs during instruction to inform teaching, and summative assessment, which occurs after instruction to evaluate learning. It also discusses learning standards, which include content standards defining what students should know and performance standards describing what students can do with their knowledge. Assessment is intended to track student progress and ensure they meet these learning standards.
This document discusses strategies for teaching rigorous and relevant instruction. It introduces frameworks for the continuum of learning, including the acquisition and application of knowledge. It then provides steps for planning instruction, including defining the unit, expected student performance, student work samples, essential content and questions. Finally, it discusses strategies for selecting, matching to frameworks, and assessing student learning.
Ca executive leadership forum (0101112)Bryan Reece
This document summarizes Cerritos College's efforts to improve developmental education outcomes through the use of technology. It describes how the college implemented programs like iFalcon to teach soft skills, expanded tutoring services at the Success Center, and used the MyFoundationsLab platform for assessment preparation and basic skills math courses. Data shows improvements in student success, retention, and completion rates college-wide and across demographic groups from 2009-2012 following these initiatives.
This document discusses how autism spectrum disorders affect writing skills. It begins by outlining how the session will examine both positive and negative impacts on writing as well as methods to improve student motivation and engagement. It then provides examples of common autism traits and how they manifest differently depending on the individual. The main topics are defined as effects on writing, improving motivation, and engagement. Specific challenges with writing are outlined along with strategies to utilize student strengths to address challenges. Accommodations for fine motor difficulties and theory of mind issues are also discussed. The document concludes by emphasizing that behaviors communicate an underlying reason and need to be addressed through assessment and strategies.
The document discusses the FLIRT acronym and what each letter stands for in reading a text. It explains that FLIRT stands for Find the form, Look at text features, Identify connections, Reveal the purpose, and Transfer to organizer. It describes what each step of FLIRT means and how it helps a reader understand and organize a text.
This document provides criteria for placing 2nd and 3rd grade students in intervention groups. For 2nd grade, students are eligible if they score low on 6 of 8 indicators measuring reading accuracy, comprehension, writing, and instructional level. For 3rd grade, criteria include a high accuracy but low words correct per minute (WCPM) score, high accuracy but low comprehension, or low instructional level and accuracy. Assessment data is collected throughout the year to monitor student progress.
Reciprocal teaching (RT) is a scaffolded discussion technique that uses four comprehension strategies - predicting, clarifying, questioning, and summarizing - to improve reading comprehension. Research shows that RT significantly improves students' reading comprehension test scores when implemented consistently. The document provides guidance on how to implement RT in classrooms at all grade levels, including connecting it to RTI frameworks through different tiers of instruction.
Reciprocal teaching (RT) is a reading comprehension strategy that involves modeling and scaffolding four strategies: predicting, clarifying, questioning, and summarizing. Research shows that RT improves students' reading comprehension test scores when implemented for 15-20 days. It is effective across grade levels and can be used in whole group, small group, and individual settings. The strategies are introduced individually with modeling and thinking aloud before students apply them during guided and independent reading.
This document discusses effective teaching strategies for reading nonfiction text. It introduces the Talking-To-The-Text (TTTT) strategy where students think out loud by writing comments in the text margins. Summarization is also covered, including having students write 25-word abstract summaries, which many struggle with. The White-out Detective method is presented where key vocabulary is covered up to help students with vocabulary and comprehension. The document emphasizes making expectations clear, convincing students strategies work, and choosing a "go-to" strategy to use consistently.
This document discusses effective teaching strategies for reading nonfiction text. It introduces the Talking-To-The-Text (TTTT) strategy where students think out loud by writing comments in the text margins. Summarization is also covered, including having students write 25-word abstract summaries, which many struggle with. The White-out Detective method is presented where key vocabulary is covered up for students to uncover. The document emphasizes making expectations clear, convincing students strategies work, and choosing a go-to strategy for consistency.
This document discusses engaging secondary learners and provides strategies to increase student engagement. It defines student engagement as students making a psychological investment in learning and trying hard to understand material. Five levels of engagement are identified: engagement, strategic compliance, ritual compliance, retreatism, and rebellion. Ideas for measuring and increasing engagement include asking students questions, effective classroom management, opportunities for student response, and varied teaching strategies. The goal is for students to be meaningfully involved in learning.
The document discusses the role of proficiency-based teaching and learning where a proficiency teacher guarantees that every student is learning and progressing. It introduces Steve Boynton, Superintendent of Arlington School District, and Rinda Montgomery Conwell, Assistant Superintendent of North Central ESD, who discuss proficiency-based models. The document then outlines various questions and details about defining proficiency, the Arlington proficiency model, and how to build a proficiency model in a school over the course of a year.
R U Ready for the Common Core?
Common Core is coming…are you, your teachers and your students ready? What goals will you need to target for student comprehension of the new standards? This session will demonstrate a web-based program and will discuss ways to utilize the results for more effective and efficient planning for Common Core.
Marlyn Smith & Pam Daniels
Curriculum Associates
ReviewThere are 13 categories of special education as define.docxronak56
Review
There are 13 categories of special education as defined by the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). In order to
qualify for special education, the IEP team must determine that a
child has one of the following:
• Autism
• Blindness
• Deafness
• Emotional Disturbance
• Hearing Impairment
• Intellectual Disability
• Multiple Disabilities
• Orthopedic Impairment
• Other Health Impaired
• Specific Learning Disability
• Speech or Language Impairment
• Traumatic Brain Injury
• Visual Impairment
SLDs Seen Most Often in
School:
-Written expression (language)
-Math calculation
-Math problem solving
-Reading fluency
-Reading comprehension
TOPICS:
Response to Instruction and
Intervention (RTII)
Multi-Tiered Systems of Support
(MTSS)
The Discrepancy Model
Progression
Response
to
Intervention
Response
to
Instruction
and
Intervention
Multi-Tiered
Instruction
and
Support
Response to Instruction and
Intervention
• RTIII is the practice of (1) providing high-
quality instruction/intervention matched to
student needs and (2) using learning rate
over time and level of performance to (3)
make important educational decisions.
(Batsche, et al., 2005)
• Uses problem-solving to develop effective
instruction/interventions.
5
1. Criterion-Referenced Benchmark
The benchmark represents a level of proficiency needed for
later school success. A good example of a commonly used
set of benchmarks for reading are those that were
developed for use with the DIBELS [Dynamic Indicators of
Basic Early Literacy Skills].
Using the DIBELS benchmarks, for example, 3rd-grade
students are at ‘low risk’ for reading problems if they reach
these reading-fluency goals:
– Start of School Year: 77 Correctly Read Words Per Min
– Middle of School Year: 92 Correctly Read Words Per Min
– End of School Year: 110 Correctly Read Words Per Min
6
2. Determine the likely reason(s) for the
student’s depressed academic
performance:
There can be several possible underlying reasons why
a student is doing poorly in an academic area. It is
crucial to determine the reason(s) for poor
performance in order to select an appropriate
intervention:
• Skill Deficit: The student lacks the necessary skills to
perform the academic task.
• ‘Fragile’ Skills: The student possesses the necessary
skills but is not yet fluent and automatic in those skills.
• Performance (Motivation) Deficit: The student has
the necessary skills but lacks the motivation to
complete the academic task.
7
3. Select a scientifically-based intervention
likely to improve the student's academic
functioning:
Any intervention idea chosen for the student
should be backed by scientific research (e.g.,
research articles in peer-reviewed professional
journals) demonstrating that the intervention is
effective in addressing the student’s
underlying reason(s) for academic failure.
8
4. Monitor academic progress frequently to
evaluate the impact ...
This document summarizes the findings of a study on the Extended Tutorial Center (ETC) program at a community college. The ETC program provides group study sessions for courses with high proportions of basic skills students. The summary shows that students participating in the ETC program had higher rates of retention, passing grades, and overall GPA compared to non-participating students in the same courses. The ETC program has grown significantly in attendance and number of courses supported. The document concludes that the ETC program increases student success rates.
KIRKPATRICK MODEL OF EVALUATION (LEO CHANDRA)vina serevina
The document discusses the Kirkpatrick (1994) model of evaluation, which consists of 4 levels - reaction, learning, behavior, and results. Level 1 measures participants' reactions to a training program. Level 2 assesses what participants learned. Level 3 looks at whether participants apply the new knowledge and skills on the job. Level 4 examines the overall impact on the organization in terms of outcomes like pass rates, GPA, retention rates, and satisfaction. The model provides a framework for conducting comprehensive evaluations of educational programs and their effects.
The document outlines a district's vision, mission, goals and strategies for improving student achievement and outcomes. The key points are:
- The district's vision is to establish a world-class, student-focused learning system where all students meet or exceed high standards.
- The district's goal and theory of action focus on engaging all staff in high-quality teaching and learning through strengthening the "instructional core" of teacher skills, rigorous content, and student engagement.
- The district will implement strategies such as professional learning communities, instructional coaching, integrating technology, and differentiated instruction to improve the instructional core.
- School goals and plans will align with the district's vision and be supported by district
The Drop-out Reduction Program (DORP) is an intervention program implemented in Philippine schools to reduce high dropout rates and improve learning outcomes. It aims to ensure every Filipino has access to quality basic education. Specific objectives include reducing and eliminating school dropout, increasing retention and achievement for students at risk of dropping out. The program utilizes formal, non-formal and informal approaches and components include the Open High School Program, Effective Alternative Secondary Education, and School Initiated Interventions. Critical factors for successful implementation include committed leadership, trained implementers, availability of materials, and stakeholder participation and support.
RTI is a multi-tiered approach to providing high-quality instruction and interventions matched to student needs through frequent progress monitoring and data-informed decisions. It involves three tiers of increasingly intensive instruction, with 80% of students receiving core instruction in Tier I, 15% receiving targeted interventions in Tier 2, and 5% receiving intensive interventions in Tier 3. The classroom teacher's role includes universal screening, differentiating Tier I instruction, monitoring student progress, implementing Tier 2 interventions, and collaborating within the problem-solving team on intervention planning and student progress.
The document outlines an assessment plan for an exceptional education program that focuses on developing skills through program tasks, data-driven intervention plans, and end assessments. The plan aims to ensure candidates can effectively develop IEPs, collaborate with others, support student behavior and learning, use assistive technologies, and apply instructional and ethical practices through embedded learning experiences. Faculty will implement observation protocols and provide feedback to help candidates improve. The goal is to produce special education teachers who are well-prepared to meet student needs.
This document provides an overview of a leadership and management module presented by Dr. Muavia Gallie on March 27, 2010. The content includes an introduction, reflection on homework, curriculum management, instructional management, and conclusion. Key terms related to outcomes-based education are defined. OBE systems design is discussed, including curriculum design, teaching practices, assessment, placement of learners, and school organization. Components of school readiness are outlined on a spectrum from dysfunctional to functional.
The document summarizes key points from a Department of Education order on classroom assessment policies for K-12 basic education in the Philippines. It outlines two types of classroom assessment: formative assessment, which occurs during instruction to inform teaching, and summative assessment, which occurs after instruction to evaluate learning. It also discusses learning standards, which include content standards defining what students should know and performance standards describing what students can do with their knowledge. Assessment is intended to track student progress and ensure they meet these learning standards.
This document discusses strategies for teaching rigorous and relevant instruction. It introduces frameworks for the continuum of learning, including the acquisition and application of knowledge. It then provides steps for planning instruction, including defining the unit, expected student performance, student work samples, essential content and questions. Finally, it discusses strategies for selecting, matching to frameworks, and assessing student learning.
Ca executive leadership forum (0101112)Bryan Reece
This document summarizes Cerritos College's efforts to improve developmental education outcomes through the use of technology. It describes how the college implemented programs like iFalcon to teach soft skills, expanded tutoring services at the Success Center, and used the MyFoundationsLab platform for assessment preparation and basic skills math courses. Data shows improvements in student success, retention, and completion rates college-wide and across demographic groups from 2009-2012 following these initiatives.
This document is a template for an Individual Professional Development Plan (IPDP) for teachers in Miami-Dade County Public Schools. The template includes sections for student performance data, training objectives, professional development activities, and an evaluation. The student performance data and training objectives are to be used to form the basis of the plan. The plan then outlines specific professional development activities and dates to support meeting the objectives. Finally, the evaluation section specifies how effectiveness will be measured, including whether objectives were met and the impact on teacher practice and student achievement. The form requires signatures from the principal and teacher at various stages to document the planning and evaluation process.
Academic assessment plan. under constructionOAAVFAC
The document summarizes an academic assessment plan under development at a college. It outlines accomplishments made so far, including inventorying existing assessment tools and aligning goals and outcomes across levels. A proposed timeline is provided seeking feedback by specific dates. The purpose is to advance the academic plan, connect it to learning goals, and promote assessment to internal and external audiences including accreditors. Input is requested from an assessment task force and college community.
The Application of Game-Like Learning Design to Real-World Settings: a Holist...Benita Rowe
1) A German university implemented a game-like learning curriculum across multiple disciplines to address challenges in higher education including rising student diversity and dropout rates.
2) The curriculum frames learning as a real-time strategy game where students complete scaffolded tasks ("side quests") in teams, receiving ongoing feedback to guide their progress.
3) Assessments were reframed as a responsive feedback loop to continuously provide students with guidance on tasks, processes, and self-regulation similar to feedback in games.
This document discusses North Carolina's educator effectiveness update for a statewide meeting of local planning teams. It focuses on setting the context for improving student learning through enabling great teaching. It discusses key elements of the educator effectiveness policies including using a growth model called EVAAS to measure standards 6 and 8, determining educator effectiveness status, and developing measures of student learning for non-tested grades and subjects. The goal is to create a system that identifies the strongest teachers so they can teach others and supports teachers who need additional help.
The interviews with English teachers at a technical high school aimed to determine how they apply cognitive and constructivist theories in their teaching. Most teachers said they aim to develop students' abilities and skills (90%) and see their role as guiding students through the learning process (80.9%). Most also said the goal of education should be to prepare competent students who can enter the workforce (80.9%). The teachers use a variety of strategies, like information technology and formative assessments, to engage students in learning (76.1%).
1. The document outlines the process for instructional data teams using a teacher-centered approach.
2. Key aspects of the process include collecting and analyzing student data, identifying instructional issues, developing plans to address issues, and monitoring progress.
3. The approach focuses on improving adult actions and instructional practices to positively impact student outcomes.
SELFIE for Teachers is a self-reflection tool developed by the European Commission to help teachers assess their digital competencies. It consists of 32 questions aligned to the European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators. The tool is available online and allows teachers to privately reflect on their skills, save progress, and receive customized feedback reports. It is designed to support individual and collaborative professional learning about integrating technology into teaching practices.
This document provides examples of how QR codes can be used in education across various content areas and activities. It includes examples such as linking QR codes to videos about QR codes, using them for personalized learning by allowing students to choose their own path, tracking student access, providing station directions, linking to book trailers and library resources, homework assignments, scavenger hunts, and a comedic student play. Step-by-step directions are also provided for creating QR codes and customizing them.
Is poetry instruction still relevant in a time when we are preparing students for high-stakes testing in school while we read and write on cell phones, iPads, and laptops out of school? According to this study, the answer is, “Yes.” Digital poetry bridges new literacy skills with traditional poetry instruction in a collaborative environment. Any opportunities educators can build a bridge between out of school and in school literacies could increase student motivation and engagement to learn. I am confident that the affordances of digital poetry instruction can provide the collaborative digital environment students’ desire while meeting the academic demands of the CCSS.
The document discusses the importance of vocabulary for students' academic success. It states that students with larger vocabularies can understand new ideas and concepts more quickly than those with limited vocabularies. Research shows a strong correlation between word knowledge and reading comprehension, so inadequate vocabulary growth will negatively impact reading ability. The document calls for more vocabulary instruction at all grade levels and notes students should add an average of 2,000-3,000 new words per year to their reading vocabularies. It provides some keys to effective vocabulary instruction such as developing a love of language, reading extensively, and teaching individual words and word learning strategies.
The document does not contain any substantial information to summarize. It appears to be a title "More High Impact Methods" but there is no further text or content provided.
This document discusses strategies for teaching students to comprehend informational texts, as required by the Common Core State Standards. It emphasizes increasing students' exposure to informational texts and teaching them text structures, such as compare/contrast, and elements, like author's purpose and main ideas. High impact methods are recommended, like explicit instruction, building vocabulary, and having students summarize within and between texts. Graphic organizers can help students learn about content topics. The overall goal is to help students develop familiarity and skill with informational texts.
This document provides an overview of a professional development session on using reading comprehension strategies to plan effective lessons. The objectives are to deepen understanding of the reading process stages of before, during, and after reading and to learn how to support all levels of readers. Strategies are presented for each reading stage, including activating prior knowledge, monitoring comprehension during reading, and summarizing and discussing after reading. Sample lessons demonstrate how to incorporate strategies into a comprehensive lesson plan using a literacy planning menu.
This document provides a menu of literacy lesson planning strategies that can be used before, during, and after reading. The pre-reading strategies activate prior knowledge and build vocabulary. During reading strategies support comprehension through connections, questioning, and graphic organizers. Post-reading strategies have students summarize, extend their learning, and make long-term memories of the text.
This document discusses using mentor texts to teach writing. Mentor texts act as coaches and partners for students and teachers to bring joy to writing. They help students envision the type of writer they can become and help teachers advance students' overall writing skills rather than just individual pieces. Writers can imitate mentor texts and find new ways to develop their own writing.
This document summarizes a presentation on using mentor texts in writing instruction. It defines mentor texts as pieces of literature that can be returned to and imitated for various purposes. It provides examples of using picture books as mentor texts and discusses how specific techniques from mentor texts, such as adjective placement, hyphenated adjectives, repetition, and sentence structure, can be taught and modeled for students. The document also includes examples of shared and guided writing lessons that incorporate mentor text techniques.
This document provides an overview of co-teaching models presented by Heather Lane and Sara Staub to teachers in the South Western School District. It defines co-teaching as two or more teachers sharing instructional responsibilities in a classroom. Four common co-teaching models are described: supportive, parallel, complementary, and team teaching. Teachers participated in a jigsaw activity to learn about each model. establishing cooperative co-teaching requires face-to-face interaction, interdependence, interpersonal skills, monitoring, and accountability. The document outlines advantages of co-teaching for general education teachers, special education teachers, and students.
The document describes the Word Walk strategy for teaching vocabulary to young children during shared storybook reading. The strategy involves introducing, practicing, and reviewing a targeted vocabulary word before, during, and after reading. Teachers first introduce a word with a picture or prop, define it, and have children repeat it. During reading, the teacher pauses when the word is encountered and provides another definition. After reading, the word is reinforced through repetition, revisiting its use in the story, and discussing other examples. The strategy provides structured guidance for implementing robust vocabulary instruction within shared storybook reading.
This document discusses the role of technology in literacy education. It notes that while schools now have varying levels of technology integration, from one computer per classroom to a laptop for every student, technology literacy is increasingly important. It argues that modern literacies involve multiple modes beyond just printed text, and that schools need to incorporate new technologies to remain relevant for students whose lives involve digital literacy practices at home. However, it also notes the value of traditional print materials and balanced use of technology and books in classrooms. The focus should be on using a variety of materials to engage students and enhance their learning.
The document discusses how teachers can use Boardmaker software to create visual supports for struggling learners, such as English Language Learners, students with disabilities, and emergent readers, in order to strengthen literacy programs and engagement through tools like communication boards, adapted books, and picture-word matching activities. Boardmaker allows teachers to pair words with pictures at different font sizes and reads text aloud, providing an accessible way to teach literacy skills. The presentation then demonstrates how to access and utilize templates and activities within Boardmaker.
The document outlines a literacy program for Shallow Brook Intermediate School that focuses on implementing the Common Core standards through a coherent curriculum using effective lesson plans emphasizing purposeful reading, writing, and talking. It describes using techniques like Socratic seminars, RAFTs, close reading strategies, and vocabulary development to improve student comprehension of complex texts. The goal is to establish high-level comprehension skills through open-ended discussion and application of learning.
This document provides guidance for implementing a writing workshop structure in the classroom. It recommends beginning with writing prompts organized by genre in baskets and having students choose a prompt, follow a formula for that genre, and return the prompt to the bin when finished. It then outlines the purpose, clue words, and typical structure for four genres: expository, narrative, persuasive, and journal writing. The document also provides ideas for creative writing and organizing student writing notebooks. It discusses using RAFT assignments to engage students and offers examples. Finally, it discusses reading responses and inclusive strategies for reaching all students in reading and writing.
Be the Coach, Not the Player
2, 4, 6, 8, guided reading can be great! When you're in a huddle with a small group of students, you don't have time to improvise. Transform your guided reading into a fast paced, interactive competition that will leave your students laughing, learning and improving their comprehension. Experience how six strategies help students control their thinking and improve their memory. Join Julie B. Wise to discover how cognitive coaching can encourage students to read a variety of short texts with interest, motivation and engagement.
The document discusses how flour and fat are manipulated in cookie recipes to produce tender, rich textures. It explains that flour forms a gluten mesh framework when moistened and mixed, but holiday cookies often require a delicate framework with minimized gluten development. Recipes use pastry flour, cake flour, or mixtures with non-gluten flours to keep the dough tender. Fat also interrupts gluten formation and makes cookies tender, while carrying flavors. Carefully reading recipes indicates which ingredients build structure and which tenderize.
The document provides criteria for placing 2nd and 3rd grade students in intervention groups such as SOAR or Guided Reading Plus based on various assessment scores. For 2nd grade, a student will be eligible if they are low on 6 of 8 indicators including accuracy rate, comprehension score, writing sample score, and instructional reading level. For 3rd grade, criteria include a high accuracy rate but low words correct per minute (WCPM) score, high accuracy but low comprehension, or low instructional reading level and accuracy score. The document also lists recommended interventions for kindergarten through 3rd grade students.
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptxEduSkills OECD
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...EduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher, Director of Education and Skills at the OECD presents at the launch of PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Minds, Creative Schools on 18 June 2024.
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsSteve Thomason
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
Juneteenth Freedom Day 2024 David Douglas School District
Psy lipson
1. What is Response to Intervention?
!! (>'-,%.-'(;%(?.;'#:'.;&%.(@>A?B(&-(".(",,#%"81(;%(
&C'.;&<4&.7(-;DC'.;-("-(5'"#.&.7(C&-"E5'C(@+2B(;1";(
,#%:&C'-(".("5;'#.";&:'(;%(;1'(;#"C&;&%."5(
C&-8#',".84(3%C'5(%<(&C'.;&F&8";&%.*((
!"##$%&'&"$()*+$
!! GD&5;(%.(0#'-&C'.;H-(I%33&--&%.(%.(JK8'55'.8'(&.(
%,--./$012343,3.$ L,'8&"5(JCD8";&%.(@MNNMB((
5,1.6$7899$ !! :;4<=/.1$>43;$<.?/141@$=42?A4<434.2$2;B,<=$C4/23$
A.$:B124=./.=$@.1./?<$.=,:?34B1$23,=.132$$
!"#$%#&'()*(+&,-%./(01*2( !! 2D.:4?<$.=,:?34B1$2;B,<=$.-A/?:.$?$-B=.<$BE$
345&,-%.673"&5*8%3*( D/.F.134B1$?2$BDDB2.=$3B$E?4<,/.$
9.&:'#-&;4(%<(='#3%.;(
IDEA (2004) and RTI
!! (((OPQ1'.(C';'#3&.&.7(Q1';1'#("(81&5C(1"-("(-,'8&F&8( !! To prevent reading difficulties and
5'"#.&.7(C&-"E&5&;4("-(C'F&.'C(&.(-'8;&%.(RNM/("(5%8"5(
'CD8";&%."5("7'.84(-1"55(STA(E'(#'UD&#'C(;%(;"V'(&.;%( !! Reduce the number of students who
8%.-&C'#";&%.(Q1';1'#("(81&5C(1"-("(-':'#'( become eligible for special education
C&-8#',".84(E';Q''.("81&':'3'.;(".C(&.;'55'8;D"5( as SLD by:
"E&5&;4(W0*+*(XNYZ[[R/(RX[@EB@RB@B]( "! Makingeffective decisions about teaching
!! (((O?.(C';'#3&.&.7(Q1';1'#("(81&5C(1"-("(-,'8&F&8( and learning that ensures success for all
5'"#.&.7(C&-"E&5&;4/("(5%8"5('CD8";&%."5("7'.84(3"4(D-'( children, and
"(,#%8'--(;1";(C';'#3&.'-(&<(;1'(81&5C(#'-,%.C-(;%( "! Determiningappropriate levels of support
-8&'.;&F&8/(#'-'"#81ZE"-'C(&.;'#:'.;&%.("-("(,"#;(%<(;1'( and intervention.
':"5D";&%.(,#%8'CD#'-P^(W0*+*(XNYZ[[R/(RX[@EB@RB@GB](
2. !! A1#''(;&'#-(%<(&.-;#D8;&%.(
!! GB/.$:,//4:,<,-H4123/,:34B1$3;?3$?==/.22.2$1..=2$
BE$?<<$23,=.132$?1=$?<<$2,A@/B,D2$$
!! %,DD<.-.13?<$2-?<<$@/B,D$4123/,:34B1$EB/$
23/,@@<41@$<.?/1./2$$
!! 013.124F.$41=4F4=,?<$413./F.134B12$EB/$23,=.132$
>;B$;?F.$1B3$.ID./4.1:.=$2,::.22$
!! A1#''(;4,'-(%<("--'--3'.;(
!! %:/..141@$
!! !/B@/.22$-B143B/41@$
!! J4?@1B242$
Response to Intervention (RtI):
Georgia’s Student Achievement
Pyramid of Interventions
The RtII Framework
Tier 4
SPECIALLY-
DESIGNED
LEARNING
Targeted students
participate in :
•!GPS access/extension
•!Greater frequency of progress monitoring
•!Specialized programs,
methodology or instructional delivery
Tier 3
SST-DRIVEN LEARNING
In addition to Tier 1 and Tier 2, targeted students participate in learning
that is different by including:
•!Individualized assessments
•!Formal Progress Monitoring
•!Interventions tailored to individual needs
•!Referral for specially-designed instruction if needed
Tier 2
NEEDS-BASED LEARNING:
In addition to Tier 1, targeted students participate in learning that is different by including:
•!Specialized pyramids of intervention
•!Greater frequency of monitoring progress of learning through multiple formative
assessments and analysis of student work
Tier 1
STANDARDS-BASED CLASSROOM LEARNING:
All students participate in general education learning that includes:
•!Implementation of the Georgia Performance Standards (GPS) through research-based practices
•!Use of differentiation of instruction such as flexible grouping, varied instructional strategies
•!Monitoring progress of learning through multiple formative assessments and analysis of student work
Georgia Department of Education Kathy Cox, State Superintendent of Schools February 5, 2008 All Rights Reserved
3. International Reading Association
Tier 2
Classroom
Slow growth or No Growth Tier 1
Regular
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
Intervention 10
Provide Classroom
Differentiated Instruction
Instruction 80-90% of Students !! Instruction
(Small Group Accelerated Growth
of Individual) !! Responsive Teaching and Differentiation
5-10% of
students
Intervention: Establishing a !! Assessment
Coordinated Continuum of
Support
Slow or No Growth !! Systemic and Comprehensive
Accelerated Growth
Tier 3
Supplemental, Accelerated Growth !! Collaboration
customized, Tier 4
Referral to Special
Intervention
(Individual or Education for !! Teacher Expertise
possible LD
Samll Group)
Slow or No Growth 1.5-3% of
5-10% of
students students http://www.reading.org/Libraries/Resources/RTI_brochure_web.sflb.ashx
IRA Guidelines on RTI
Principles #5: Systemic Approaches
11 12
!! >A?(.''C-(;%(E'(&.;'7#";'C(Q&;1&.(;1'(:B13.I3$
!! “RTI must be part of a comprehensive, BE$?$:B;./.13$?1=$:B12423.13$<?1@,?@.$?1=$
systemic approach to language and literacy <43./?:K$:,//4:,<,-$;1";(7D&C'-(
assessment and instruction that supports all 8%3,#'1'.-&:'(&.-;#D8;&%.(<%#("55(-;DC'.;-*(
preK-12 students and teachers.” !! I%#'(&.-;#D8;&%./(&.C''C(?<<$4123/,:34B16$-,23$
A.$:B1341,B,2<K$4-D/BF.=$3B$41:/.?2.$432$
.EC4:?:K(".C(3&;&7";'(;1'(.''C(<%#(-,'8&"5&_'C(
&.;'#:'.;&%.-*(
4. RTI is a(an): RTI Management: Teams
!! General education-led effort implemented within the !! Review school-wide !! Group all students via
student performance data level of intervention based
general education system; coordinated with all other
!! Prescribe instructional or
on student performance
services, including special education, Title I, ELL, data
Migrant Education, etc. behavioral interventions
for students based on !! Monitor students’
!! System to provide instructional intervention intensity of identified progress toward
immediately upon student need needs established goals and
!! Process that determines if the child responds to !! Set short- and long-term
benchmarks
scientific, research-based intervention as a part of goals for the school and !! Adjust interventions
the evaluation procedures. students to progress based on student
toward established performance data
benchmark or standards
The Promise… Unsettling Facts
!! Children’s needs are addressed as soon as they are !! Of the 6 million children in special education, half
noted; of those are identified as having a "specific learning
disability," and the number has grown more than
!! Focus on prevention that can reduce unnecessary 300 percent since 1976.
student failure, labeling, segregation, and !! Roughly 6 percent of all school-age children are
remediation in special education; and being served as LD under IDEA
!! Special education placements tend to stabilize the
!! The artificial general and special education barriers reading growth of students with reading disabilities
should be eliminated rather than accelerate it. (Vaughn, 1998, Moody,
2000)
!! Students who enter special education 2+ years
below age mates can be expected to maintain
disparity or fall farther behind.
!! Effect size for LD programs is .29 (Reschly)
5. Points of Consensus
!! The current state of affairs needs addressing #!(A1'(/B<.2$?1=$ #!A1'(1?3,/.$BE$
"! Struggling readers, generally speaking, have not /.2DB124A4<434.2$%<(( 4123/,:34B1$
improved their achievement or performance very
much ….Whether that is reading intervention or $!A1'(85"--#%%3( $!`1";(;%(;'"81a(
special education ;'"81'#(
$!b%Q(;%(;'"81(&;a(
"! Disproportionally more poor and minority students $!A1'(#'"C&.7(-,'8&"5&-;(
fail to learn to read well. $!!%C'5-(%<(>A?(
$!A1'(-,'8&"5('CD8";%#(
!! Waiting for students to fail is not acceptable $!`1%(C%'-(Q1";a(
$!T;1'#-(@'*7*(L+0B(
!! Providing more effective instruction is worth doing
$!A1'(C3&.&-;#";%#@-B(
20
!! 2&-;&.8;(<D.C&.7(
,#%8'--'-(
$0%5&84(@".C(-DE-'UD'.;(#'7D5";%#4(
85"#&F&8";&%.B(-"4-(;1";(-;";'-(".C(C&-;#&8;-(
!! 2&:'#-'(#'7D5";%#4(
(1":'(;1'(F5'K&E&5&;4(;%('-;"E5&-1(
-4-;'3-( 3%C'5-(;1";(#'F5'8;(;1'&#(%Q.(
!! (2&<<'#'.;( 8%33D.&;4H-(D.&UD'(-&;D";&%.( (
@,'#8'&:'CB( ":"&5"E5'(#'-%D#8'-*(
3&--&%.-(
!! 2&<<'#'.;&";'C(
,#%<'--&%."5(
8%33D.&;&'-(
8. 29
!! I%.-&-;'.84(&.(5&;'#"84(&.-;#D8;&%.(&-(#'5";'C(;%(
!! (-4-;'3&8(",,#%"81(;%(5".7D"7'(".C(5&;'#"84( E';;'#(-;DC'.;(%D;8%3'-(@!%-'.;1"5/(+&,-%.(';("5*/(
5'"#.&.7(Q&;1&.(".(>A?(<#"3'Q%#V(/.O,4/.2$3;.$ MNN[B(
?:34F.$D?/34:4D?34B1$?1=$@.1,41.$ !! 0"&#&.7('<<'8;&:'(-D,,5'3'.;"#4(&.-;#D8;&%.(Q&;1(
:B<<?AB/?34B1$BE$-?1K$D/BE.224B1?<2( ",,#%,#&";'(85"--#%%3(5'--%.-(,#%CD8'-(E';;'#(
&.85DC&.7(85"--#%%3(;'"81'#-/(#'"C&.7( 7"&.-(;1".(85"--#%%3(#'"C&.7("5%.'(@!";1'-(';("5*/(
-,'8&"5&-;-c5&;'#"84(8%"81'-/(-,'8&"5('CD8";%#-/( MNNeB(
L+0-(".C(-81%%5(,-481%5%7&-;-*((( !! 5;1%D71(8%55"E%#";&%.(E';Q''.(&.;'#:'.;&%.(".C(
85"--#%%3(;'"81'#-(&-(#"#'/(&;(&-("--%8&";'C(Q&;1(
-;#%.7'#(#'"C&.7(%D;8%3'-(@G%#3".(';("5*/(MNNXB(
Specifically…..
!! Educators may be working from out-dated materials or
may have had limited PD to prepare them for new roles
!! Teachers may not be teaching with enough urgency
012,EC4:4.13$'F?4<?A<.$"ID./342.$$$ and/or differentiating instruction for small groups of
012,EC4:4.13$013.1243K$$ students
P42,1=./23?1=41@2$?-B1@$ !! Reading professionals may not detail the nature of
GB<<?AB/?34F.$!?/31./2$ their interventions (vs 30 minutes 4 x week)
0-D<.-.13?34B1$!/BA<.-2$ "! What focus and goals?
"! What materials
'=.O,?:K$BE$'22.22-.132$
"! How long?
"! How will we know?
9. Specifically….. WORKING TOWARD
SOLUTIONS
!! Special educators/para educators may not have
sufficient literacy expertise to tailor programs for
individuals
!! The assessment plan may not be coherent or may be Using the Principles
inadequate to capture varying profiles of need and the Research to
!! There may be no historical legacy of collaboration
"! Scheduling time to collaborate can be a real challenge
Improve Literacy
"! Preparing people to engage in collaborative Instruction and
consultation may be an even greater one
Achievement $
!! (L;"#;(Q&;1(7%%C(F&#-;(@8%#'B(&.-;#D8;&%.( #!(2':'5%,3'.;"554Z #! JK;'.-&:'(%,,%#;D.&;4(
!! J.F.<BD-.13?<<K$?DD/BD/4?3.$ ",,#%,#&";'( ;%(#'"C(".C(Q#&;'(
!! '::.224A<.$3B$?<<$23,=.132$ ID##&8D5D3(
#! 2&<<'#'.;(3";'#&"5-/(
!! Q2.$.F4=.1:.RA?2.=$D/?:34:.26$A,3$.I?-41.$3;.$
4-D?:3$B1$2D.:4C4:$23,=.132$
#! I%3,#'1'.-&:'(".C( ;"-V-/(".C(",,#%"81'-(
E"5".8'C(5&;'#"84( ;%("88%3,5&-1(
!! 9-'(C";"(;%(&.<%#3(&.-;#D8;&%.(".C('.7"7'(&.(C";"ZE"-'C( ,#%7#"3f(g&.85DC&.7( C&<<'#'.;(%D;8%3'-(
8%.:'#-";&%.-(Q&;1(8%55'"7D'-(;%(3"V'(C'8&-&%.-( ;1'(D-'(%<(
!! "12,/.$3;.$-.?141@E,<1.22$BE$3;.$=?3?$$ 2:4.134C4:?<<K$A?2.=$ #! 2&<<'#'.;(;'K;-(<%#(
!! &/K$3B$?FB4=$AB3;$3BB$<433<.$?1=$3BB$-,:;$?22.22-.13$ 4123/,:34B1?<$ C&<<'#'.;(,D#,%-'-(
!! 0#%:&C'(#'-,%.-&:'(;'"81&.7(".C(%,;&3&_'(&.-;#D8;&%.(<%#( D/?:34:.2ST$(
,"#;&8D5"#(-;DC'.;-(E4(C&<<'#'.;&";&.7(( #! ?.-;#D8;&%.(;1";(&-(
#! --'--3'.;(;1";( C&<<'#'.;&";'C(".C(
!! `%#V(-4-;'3&8"554( &.<%#3-(&.-;#D8;&%.( #'-,%.-&:'(;%(
!! "12,/.$:B12423.1:K$?1=$:B;./.1:.$
-;DC'.;-H(.''C-(
!! GB<<?AB/?3.$$
10. Research—Teachers’ Core Instruction Research—Teacher Expertise
!! A1'(&3,"8;(%<(;1'(;'"81'#(&-(;1'(-&.75'(3%-;(,%Q'#<D5( !! J<<'8;-(%<('<<'8;&:'c&.'<<'8;&:'(;'"81'#-(%.(-;DC'.;-(
:"#&"E5'(&.('K,5"&.&.7(-;DC'.;(#'"C&.7("81&':'3'.;( #'"C&.7("81&':'3'.;("#'(8D3D5";&:'(@G'3E#4(';("5/(
@S4'(';("5*(MNN[B( XhhYB(
!! J<<'8;&:'(;'"81'#-(( "! &;.$@/.?3./$3;.$1,-A./$BE$.EE.:34F.$3.?:;./2$
"! GB11.:3$<.22B12$3B$23,=.13$.ID./4.1:.2$ 23,=.132$;?=$BF./$[$K.?/26$3;.$;4@;./$3;.$23,=.132$
"! UB23./$-B34F?34B1$EB/$<.?/141@$2D.:4C4:$:B13.13$ ?:;4.F.-.13$
"! V.<D$23,=.132$>B/N$3B>?/=$-B/.$:B-D<4:?3.=$ "! %3,=.132$3?,@;3$AK$:B12423.13<K$41.EE.:34F.$
,1=./23?1=41@2$ 3.?:;./2$2:B/.=$41$7]3;$D./:.134<.$:B-D?/.=$>43;$
"! J4?@1B2.$=4EC4:,<34.2$41$<.?/141@$ 3;B2.$3?,@;3$AK$:B12423.13<K$.EE.:34F.$3.?:;./2$>;B$
"! !/BF4=.$?$>4=.$?//?K$BE$<.?/141@$BDDB/3,1434.2$-?3:;.=$3B$ 2:B/.=$41$^83;$D./:.134<.$
23,=.132$1..=2$?1=$413./.232$$
"! W'<<41@3B1$X$5B;123B16$7887Y$!/.22<.K6$7887Z$
Good Teaching Matters
!! OT.7%&.7(".C($%EZ'3E'CC'C(,#%<'--&%."5(
!! “Many students currently identified as
C':'5%,3'.;(&-(.'8'--"#4(<%#("55('CD8";%#-(
learning disabled would not have been
&.:%5:'C(&.(;1'(>A?(,#%8'--P*0#%<'--&%."5(
identified if instruction had been
'K,'#;&-'(&-('--'.;&"5(;%(&3,#%:&.7(-;DC'.;-H(
appropriately targeted and
5".7D"7'(".C(5&;'#"84(5'"#.&.7(&.(7'.'#"5("-(
responsive” (Scanlon et al. 2008, p. 1)
Q'55("-(Q&;1&.(;1'(8%.;'K;(%<(>A?*^(
12. Consider…. Consider….
!! (`1";(-;#'.7;1-("#'(':&C'.;(&.(%D#(:B/.$4123/,:34B1a( !! (`1";(-;#'.7;1-("#'(':&C'.;(&.(%D#(BF./?<<$2K23.-a(
"! L;?3$42$>B/N41@$>.<<M$ "! JB$>.$;?F.$?$2;?/.=$F424B1$BE$<43./?:K$W3.?:;41@$?1=$
"! L;?3$?/.$3.?:;./2$?</.?=K$>B/N41@$B1M$ <.?/141@ZM$
"! JB.2$43$>B/N$.O,?<<K$>.<<$EB/$?<<$23,=.132M$ "! 02$3;./.$?$:B;./.13$?DD/B?:;$3B$<43./?:K$>43;41$?1=$?:/B22$
3;.$@/?=.2M$
!! (`1";(&-(%D#(?22.22-.13$2K23.-a(
"! $JB.2$3;.$2K23.-$2,DDB/3$?1=$.1;?1:.$<.?/141@$EB/$?<<$
"! L;?3$42$>B/N41@$>.<<M$
23,=.132M$
"! 02$43$:B-D/.;.124F.M$$02$43$2.124A<.M$
!! (b%Q(C%(Q'(Q%#V(:B<<?AB/?34F.<Ka(
"! JB.2$43$D/BF4=.$,2$>43;$41EB/-?34B1$3;?3$>.$:?1$,2.$3B$
"! L;?3$42$>B/N41@$>.<<M$
4-D/BF.$B,3:B-.2$EB/$?<<$23,=.132M$
"! '/.$>.$@/B>41@$D/BE.224B1?<<KM$
"! JB.2$43$D/BF4=.$,2$>43;$41EB/-?34B1$?AB,3$3;.$2D.:4C4:$
1..=2$?1=$23/.1@3;2$BE$3;.$-B23$F,<1./?A<.$23,=.132M$ "! 02$3;./.$?$A?<?1:.$BE$?,3B1B-K$?1=$/.2DB124A4<43KM$
"! L;?3$/.2B,/:.2$?/.$?<<B:?3.=$EB/$3;42$.1@?@.-.13M$
3. Develop an Action Plan 4. Make Decisions
!! How will existing initiatives and opportunities be !! (E%D;(?.-;#D8;&%.(
incorporated into any systemic plan for action !! (E%D;(--'--3'.;(
!! Describe the approach to RTI to be used !! (E%D;(0#%<'--&%."5(2':'5%,3'.;(
!! Identify and address concerns and barriers !! (E%D;(I%%#C&.";&%./(I%1'#'.8'(".C(I%55"E%#";&%.(
!! Identify needed resources, PD, materials,
assessment tools, etc.
!! Identify what outcomes will be used to measure
effectiveness
!! Establish a timeline for implementation
13. 4. Make Decisions Taking Stock
!! What improvements can/should be made in classroom
!! Decide who will be involved in shaping
interventions and in making decisions about instruction (that would benefit all Ss)?
students’ response to instruction !! What does customization and intensification look like
for each successive tier?
!! Identify the assessment system to be used
!! Are intervention designs documented so that:
!! Determine the PD required for classroom teachers, "! It is clear what instruction the students are receiving?
literacy specialists, and special educators "! They can be used with other students who have
!! Establish benchmarks for monitoring students’ similar difficulties?
progress !! Are the interventions complementary to Tier 1
instruction?
!! Decide how data will be collected, displayed, and
discussed !! What provisions have been made to limit interventions
and keep scheduling flexible?
RTI Requires Top-down and
Bottom-Up Action
d! L;?3$-?N.2$*&0$?$EB:,2.=$41434?34F.$42$ d! 2&-;#&8;-(1":'(;%(Q"5V(;1'(5&.'(E';Q''.(
3;.$2K23.-?34_?34B1$BE$@BB=$?22.22-.13$ ,#%:&C&.7("(8%1'-&:'(<#"3'Q%#V(<%#(>A?/(
?1=$4123/,:34B1?<$D/?:34:.26$1B3$`,23$ &.85DC&.7(-D,,%#;(<%#(-81%%5-(".C(
RTI
!"#$%&2$BE$.I:.<<.1:.$>43;41$?$2:;BB<S$ "55%Q&.7(F5'K&E&5&;4(;%("CC#'--(&.C&:&CD"5(
-81%%5(.''C-*((
d! L81%%5-(8".H;(Q"&;(<%#(C&-;#&8;-(;%(C%(;1'(
Q%#V*(A1'4(1":'(;%('K"3&.'(;1'&#("--';-(
".C(D-'(;1'3("-(ED&5C&.7(E5%8V-(;%(3%:'(
<%#Q"#C*(
14. #!(J:'#4%.'(&-(Q%#V&.7( #!(A'"81'#-(E'5&':'(;1";( As Fullan (1997) has noted,
;%Q"#C("(-1"#'C(:&-&%.( "55(81&5C#'.(8".(5'"#.( “Productive educational change roams
".C(<"8D5;4(1":'( #!(2";"ZC#&:'.( somewhere between over-control and
8%33%.(7%"5-@-B( 8%33D.&8";&%.( chaos…You cannot mandate what matters,
#!(T,'.(".C(,#%CD8;&:'( #!A'"81'#-(1":'( because what really matters for complex
8%33D.&8";&%.(".C( "D;%.%34(&.(85"--#%%3( goals of change are skills, creative
8%55"E%#";&%.("3%.7( C'8&-&%.-Z3"V&.7( thinking, and committed action” (pp. 33-35)
<"8D5;4( #!>'-,%.-&:'(;%( .
#!(j'.D&.'(".C(3D;D"5( 8%33D.&;4(.''C-(
#'-,'8;("3%.7(-;"<<(
From: Mosenthal, Lipson et al. (2004) !