This document discusses ways to promote investment in science, technology, and innovation in IDB member countries. It argues that investment in knowledge and innovation is key to economic growth. It recommends increasing support for education and R&D, promoting partnerships between universities and industry, and strengthening national innovation systems through policies that encourage investment in areas like technology development and diffusion. Overall the document analyzes innovation indicators in IDB countries and provides suggestions for how organizations like IDB could better promote science and technology to spur economic development.

1. Promoting Investment in Science and
Technology in IDB Member Countries
Jamil Alkhatib∗
July 22, 2007
The Old City,
Jerusalem, Palestine
Abstract
In the rapid changing world, neither the financial capital nor the
human power are the only factors to the continuous progress in the
economy, the innovation and the knowledge play nowadays major
role in the economic growth. This article will discuss the role of sci-
ence, technology and innovation on the economical development of
the IDB member countries.
In order to achieve such economical development, the investment
in innovation and knowledge based projects should be supported
and the industry awareness of the importance of science should be
increased. Besides that, the educational and research systems have to
focus on the applied researches to improve the quality of investment
outcome. Some approaches that could be adopted to increase the
awareness of innovation and the investment in technological related
∗
Technology and Innovation Management Consultant
1

2. 2
projects will be introduced in this article.
The status of the Innovation system in the IDB member countries
will be discussed. Finally some recommendations on how to improve
the economics based on science, technology and innovation in the
IDB member countries will be suggested.

3. CONTENTS 3
Contents
1 Introduction 4
2 Technology, Science and Economy 5
3 The Innovation system in the IDB countries 7
4 Promoting investment in innovations 11
5 Promoting University-Industry linkage 14
6 The role of IDB Programs 17
7 Conclusions and recommendations 18
References 19

4. 4 1 INTRODUCTION
1 Introduction
“Diffusion of technical know-how does not simply depend
on ability to pay. It owes a great deal to personal contacts and
discussion, or to the movement of people” (Freeman and Soete,
2004, p.179)
Although sometimes large amount of money are invested in Science and
Technology projects, but they have minor effects on the national economy.
One of the common problems in such investments is buying the Technol-
ogy directly instead of developing it. Like in the turn key projects and
ICT infrastructure implementation where only the Technology and equip-
ments are transferred without the real knowledge behind them.
This article will focus on some approaches in promoting the investment
in Technology and Science while supporting the economical progress
through Innovation in the Islamic Development Bank (IDB) member coun-
tries.
In this context it is important to define some terms before proceeding with
the discussion.
“Science is a system of acquiring knowledge based on the scientific
method.” (Wikipedia the free encyclopedia, 2007b)
Technology is “the system of knowledge, skills, experience and organi-
zation used to produce and utilize goods and services to satisfy human
demand.” (UNIDO, 1996, p.21)
“Invention is an object, process, or technique which displays an element
of novelty.” (Wikipedia the free encyclopedia, 2007a)
The Innovation “is the implementation of a new or significantly improved
product (good or service), or process, a new marketing method, or a new

5. 5
organisational method in business practices, workplace organisation or
external relations. (...) This includes products, processes and methods
that firms are the first to develop and those that have been adopted from
other firms or organisations.” (OECD, 2005, p.46)
Although the literature classifies the Innovations into 4 groups: product
innovations, process innovations, organizational innovations and market-
ing innovations this article will focus only on product and process inno-
vations since they are the most observable category.
2 Technology, Science and Economy
“Innovation is of importance not only for increasing the
wealth of nations in the narrow sense of increased prosperity,
but also in the more fundamental sense of enabling people to
do things which have never been done before. It enables the
whole quality of life to be changed for better or for worse.”
(Freeman and Soete, 2004, p.2)
Both Marx and Smith have considered Technology, Science and Inventions
as elements in the economical growth. Empirical studies showed that be-
fore the industrial revolution, the difference between industrial and devel-
oping countries was small and after that the difference has increased dra-
matically (Freeman and Soete, 2004, p.317). It is important for the devel-
oping countries to catch-up with the Technological development to reach
the economical growth. The catch-up can be achieved by imitation or in-
novation.
The Technological change and inventions can be drivers for new invest-
ments in new machines, new services or even training the staff. Innova-
tions and Inventions can attract not only local investment but also foreign

6. 6 2 TECHNOLOGY, SCIENCE AND ECONOMY
direct investment (FDI).
The effect of innovation on productivity and competitiveness improve-
ment on the national and countries level is similar to the effect on firms.
The entrepreneurs increase and start to invest in the country which in
turns opens new jobs specially in Research and Development (R&D).
Moreover, since the innovation is considered as creative destruction, it cre-
ates new needs and production qualifications in the country which opens
new chances for young people to have new jobs. Not only that, but the
Innovations improves the foreign trade through selling new competitive
products or services.
According to (Freeman and Soete, 2004, p.291) the National Innovation
system can be defined as the “interactions between various institutions
dealing with science and technology as well as with higher education, in-
novation and technology diffusion (...) whether public or private” insti-
tutes.
The Innovation system is a complex system and in order to improve it,
multiple fields should be considered. Nowadays the scientific and tech-
nical progresses are the main drivers for innovations. Moreover the firms
can no longer be able to innovate alone, because the “Innovation now often
requires more external and more multidisciplinary knowledge, as many
technologies have become extremely complex.” (OECD, 2000b, p.4). The
firms also are required to save on their internal research and development
(R&D) due to the high competition.
Further more, the scientific researches are too expensive and tend to be
beyond the ability of universities and research institutes. “In addition, the
lack of skilled personnel is a key barrier to innovation that needs to be
addressed. While a case can be made for greater international mobility
of human resources, countries also need to address education, skills up-

7. 7
grading and human resource management at the domestic level.”(OECD,
2000b, p.9)
For all these reasons, the demand for cooperation between institute and
the establishment of innovation networks become the most common ap-
proach to innovate. Links between firms and research institutes and al-
liances between industrial firms have been established.
In order to explore the innovation system in any region it would be im-
portant to measure its main indicators and study the interaction among
different institutes. The indicators can be classified as Inputs and outputs
indicators. The input indicators are: R&D personnel, education and R&D
expenditure, while the output indicators are: patents, scientific publica-
tions and technology trade (Lederman and Saenz, 2005, pp.4–6); (OECD,
2005);(Nour, 2005, pp.11–13);(ESCWA, 2003, pp.7–65). Moreover the in-
vestments incentives and ICT infrastructure are of great importance for
innovation promotion which could be measured.
3 The Innovation system in the IDB countries
This section will give an outlook at the Innovation system in some of the
IDB countries by reviewing the innovation indicators.
Input indicators
The expenditure Education in most of the IDB member countries are too
far away from the international standards and even in countries in the
same region as the IDB countries. Table 1 shows the expenditure of some
selected countries. Moreover the expenditure on R&D activities is very
low when it is compared to the global average expenditure in 2003 which

8. 8 3 THE INNOVATION SYSTEM IN THE IDB COUNTRIES
was 2.4% (Watkins et al., 2005, pp.262–265). The industry plays minor role
in the R&D expenditure in the Arab states and the African countries while
in the USA 66% comes from the private sector (Watkins et al., 2005, pp.17–
18) .
State/Region Education % of GDP* R&D % of GDP
Egypt 1.9** 0.2
Saudi Arabia 5.8** ...
Syria 4.0** 0.2
Tunisia 6.4 0.6
UAE 1.6 ...
Indonesia 1.2 ...
Iran 4.9 ...
Pakistan 1.8 0.2
Turkey 3.7 0.7
Malaysia 8.1 0.7
Senegal 3.6 ...
Israel 7.5 5.1
India 4.1 0.8
South Korea 4.2 2.5
Germany 4.6 1.5
Canada 5.2 1.9
OECD ... 2.5
Table 1: The Expenditure on Education and R&D as percentage of GDP in
some selected countries
Source (Watkins et al., 2005, pp.284–287,262–265)
* In 2002 ** In 1990
According to (MASTIC, 2005, P.7),(Qasem, 2003, P.26) and (Bennani et al.,
2003, p.71), the Social Sciences and humanities are more popular than S&T
related fields in Malaysia and Arab states, which is very similar to the
rest of the IDB countries. This is reflected to the number of researchers as
indicated in table 2

9. 9
Country/Region In Thousands Per million Inhabitants
Arab States 39.7 136
Malaysia ... 730*
New Industrialized states in Asia 291.1 777.2
Israel 9.2 1395.2
India 117.5 112.1
OECD 3414.3 2984.4
Table 2: Number of researchers in 2002
Source: (Watkins et al., 2005, p.6)
* Source: (MASTIC, 2005, P.7)
Output indicators
The weakness in the input indicators is reflected to the outputs. The
patents and publications in the IDB countries are too far away from the
neighboring countries according to tables 3 and 4.

10. 10 3 THE INNOVATION SYSTEM IN THE IDB COUNTRIES
Countries Patents
Egypt 80
Saudi Arabia 250
Syria 17
UAE 56
Senegal 4
Indonesia 201
Iran 35
Malaysia 776
Pakistan 32
Turkey 179
Israel 14649
Singapore 3565
South Korea 46773
Taiwan 71518
Germany 241584
Canada 71216
Table 3: Registered Patents in USPTO from 1980–2006 of selected countries
Source: Adopted from (USPTO, 2006)
Countries/Regions % of the whole world Total
Arab States 0.9 5416
Newly Industrialized countries in Asia 4.1 24 253
Malaysia* 0.08 ...
Israel 1.3 7744
India 1.9 11 620
OECD 86.9 519 951
Table 4: Scientific publications in 2001
Source: (UNESCO, 2005, P.9)
* Source: (MASTIC, 2005, P.10)
* In 2002
The High Technology exports is an important indicator for innovation. In
2003 the average High-technology exports was 2% of the total manufac-

11. 11
tured exports in the Arab States. This figure in the most IDB countries is
lower than the world average which was 18% except Malaysia (Watkins
et al., 2005, pp.274–277).
Countries/Region Hi-Tech export %
Arab States 2
Indonesia 14
Iran 2
Malaysia 58
Pakistan 1
Senegal 9
Turkey 2
Israel 18
OECD 18
East Asia 29
Table 5: High Technology Exports in 2003
Source: (Watkins et al., 2005, pp.274–277)
4 Promoting investment in innovations
“Intangible investment in new knowledge and its dissemi-
nation are the critical elements, rather than tangible investment
in bricks and machines” Freeman and Soete (2004, P.3)
As it has been noticed in the beginning of the article, direct investment in
Science, Technology and Innovation should be considered carefully or it
will not generate the accumulation of knowledge or technology transfer
to the state.
In the IDB countries there is a direct need for investments in the education
system improvements specially in the fields of science and technology and
to increase the students enrollment in these fields. Moreover, the gradu-

12. 12 4 PROMOTING INVESTMENT IN INNOVATIONS
ates from these fields should be able to find jobs in their field of the study
otherwise the investment in the students will be lost either due to brain
drain problem or because they will be working in fields other than their
specialty. In order to minimize such problem, the R&D activities should
be promoted in both the public and private sectors.
The United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO, 2007)
in its service program for promoting the investment and technology puts
several recommendations and activities to focus on. These recommenda-
tions will be used as guidelines in this section.
Supporting Foreign Direct investments (FDI)
The main factor in promoting the FDI is the proper policies and incen-
tives structure planned by governments. Establishing business alliances
and building cooperation and innovation networks will encourage and
increase the FDI.
Although it is important to have FDI in capital accumulation and intro-
duction of new machinery, the most effective approach for the economy
that lead investment in knowledge (know-how) transfer. This would be
achieved by more involvement of local researchers and engineers in the
development process because the normal storage of the knowledge is the
human brain and experience.
Supporting Institutional building
Institutions that support training in investment and feasibility studies play
great role in investment promotion and its efficiency. Business incubators
Technology centers and centers of excellence are some examples of such

13. 13
institutes which aim to implement and improve network of experts.
Moreover Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) play great role in Inno-
vation and employment while the investments in their activities are rela-
tively small compared to large firms. That is why lot of economies in the
world are based on the investments on SMEs.
Supporting Technology and Innovation Management Systems
Similar to financial management, the Technology and Innovation should
be managed carefully to optimize the use of the technology and the inno-
vation process. For example the process of creating new ideas and devel-
oping them to reach the level of investment, production and marketing
fall within the frame work of innovation management. Such management
will increase the productivity of the employees and increase the overall
competitiveness in the market.
On larger scale policies for key technologies diffusion in different fields
should be implemented. An example of that is the diffusion of the com-
puters and Internet not only in the industry but also in the educational sys-
tems (E-learning) , the governments (E-Government) and even for books
(E-Books). This indicates that buying or developing the technology are not
the only keys to the success of investment, its diffusion and making use of
it in several fields and programs lead to more effective investment.
The transfer of ideas and technologies from the science or research insti-
tutes to marketable products in the industry is considered a major process
to be managed which is known as the Technology Transfer. This will be
elaborated later in the next section.

14. 14 5 PROMOTING UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY LINKAGE
Supporting Technology Foresight
Technology foresight and Capacity building in emerging technologies en-
able the policy makers to better plan for the future in education, science
and several fields. The investment in emerging technology leads to long
term and continuous progress.
5 Promoting University-Industry linkage
“It should be noted that only 60% of university research in
the USA is financed with federal funds, the remainder stem-
ming from university partnerships with industry.” (UNESCO,
2005, p.169).
The demand on University-Industry cooperation has increased because
the technologies are complex nowadays and depend on multidisciplinary
knowledge. Through cooperation the R&D and knowledge acquisition
costs can be minimized. The “universities seek industry contacts to en-
sure good job prospects for students, to keep curricula up to date and to
obtain research support.”(OECD, 2000b, p.4) while firms are interested to
get talented employees and get access to knowledge to improve their po-
sition in innovation networks.
Technology Transfer is one of the common conventions used in the liter-
ature in the context of research and industry relationships. “The conven-
tional conception of technology transfer is that it is a processes through
which the results of basic and applied research are put into use by recep-
tors” (Rogers, 2003, p.150). This means the investment in science and new
technologies in new products and innovations.

15. 15
The Technology transfer is “recognized to be complex social activities with
communication processes at the core of them” (Hodgson, 2002, p.1). Fig-
ure 1 shows the complexity of a technology transfer model and the ap-
proaches for cooperation.
Figure 1: Technology Transfer Model
Source: (OECD, 2000a, p.165)
Cooperation schemes and investment opportunities
The last figure shows several methods of cooperation approaches between
the industry and universities. Some of the major discussed and imple-
mented approaches are summarized below
• Business and Technology Incubators
Where the entrepreneurs reach these incubators to be supported, get the
consulting form professionals in implementing their ideas in real products
and to markets and in some cases they can get seed fund to start their

16. 16 5 PROMOTING UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY LINKAGE
projects. The investment in such institutes promotes and encourages the
innovation and in turns increases the demand on new innovations.
• Spin-offs from universities
Lot of ideas and research results are generated from universities and many
of them could lead to better (or new) products in the market. The univer-
sities license their research results to start-up companies that are directly
linked to the university through its staff that could be shared between the
company and the university. Such kind of start-up companies play major
role in connecting the local industry to the universities.
• Research, Development and Innovation (RDI) Networks or alliances
Such alliances or networks are created for large innovative projects where
neither companies nor universities can handle them alone. So they coop-
erate to gather the talents, knowledge and investment. They will be able
to produce joint projects or joint publications.
• Mobility of scientists
“The mobility of scientists between science and industry is also an impor-
tant channel of interaction” (OECD, 2000b, P.5) because they are the main
holders of knowledge. When they move form university to the industry
and vise versa they help in the knowledge and technology diffusion. To
support such activity it is important to invest and cover the salaries of the
scientists besides giving the legal framework for their work.
• Open Source Projects
They are projects that are developed in cooperation volunteers where the
results are made available for free on the Internet. Such kind of projects
knows no boundaries and is open for all participants. Through Internet
the researchers and engineers with specialty in specific field can cooper-

17. 17
ate together to produce large project no matters where they are. Moreover
the open source projects speed up the knowledge transfer between coun-
tries and the access to experts from all over the world and from different
industries.
The investment in such projects will improve the skills of local researchers
and increase the spirit of cooperation which in turns could improve the
cooperation between the industry and research institutes.
6 The role of IDB Programs
The IDB aims to support the development of the Islamic states. Science
and Technology are of the key fields that will support the economical de-
velopment and the IDB focus on them.
One of the main programs that support the accumulation of the knowl-
edge is the Science and Technology Scholarship Program. The study schol-
arships enable the students to learn about new fields of knowledge and get
them back to their countries or to their field of work. In order to have such
program effective suitable jobs and work chances for the graduated stu-
dents must be created. Otherwise they will be overqualified in their work
field and may either leave the country for better jobs (brain drain problem)
or will stay and not be able to benefit the country with their study.
The IDB has implemented some programs to support the technology and
science. Science Development Network (SDN) is one of the major pro-
grams that support the science and knowledge diffusion among the IDB
countries. Establish network of scientists and experts that can cooperate
to promote scientific progress and the cooperation between research insti-
tutes among the IDB countries.

18. 18 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
7 Conclusions and recommendations
The article has discussed the role of Science and Technology for the eco-
nomical development and the status of IDB countries. In order to promote
the science and technology, investment in these fields must be carried on.
The key factor to success in investment is not the amount spent on tech-
nology import but it is how and where the investment goes and how much
knowledge it generates.
The IDB plays major role in the investment in technology and science in
its member countries. It has several programs in that field. Moreover
there should be more focus on supporting studies on the economics of
innovation. The IDB should try to invest in non-conventional methods
like open source projects.
Finally the IDB has to support the establishment of institutes that provides
direct support to researchers and investment.

19. REFERENCES 19
References
Farida Bennani, Hoda Elsadda, Nader Fergany, Fahmi Jadaane, and Atif
Kubursi. The Arab Human Development Report 2003: Building a knowl-
edge society. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), New
York, USA, 2003. URL http://hdr.undp.org/reports/detail_
reports.cfm?view=712. Last accessed September 2006.
United Nations Economic & Social Commission for Western Asia ESCWA.
New Indicators for Science, Technology and Innovation in the KNOWLEDGE-
BASED Socity. United Nations Economic & Social Commission for West-
ern Asia (ESCWA), New York, USA, 2003.
C. Freeman and L. Soete. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Thomson
Learning, UK, third edition edition, 2004.
R.M. Hodgson. The development and transfer of advanced technology
from universities to industry. In Electronic Design, Test and Applications,
2002. Proceedings. The First IEEE International Workshop on, pages 197–
202, 29-31 Jan. 2002.
Daniel Lederman and Laura Saenz. Innovation and development around
the world, 1960-2000. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3774,
November 2005.
Malaysian Science and Technology Information Center MASTIC.
Malaysian Science and Technology Indicators: 2004 report. Ministry of
Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI), January 2005. URL
http://www.mastic.gov.my. Last accessed July 2007.
Samia Satti O. M. Nour. Science and technology development indicators
in the arab region: A comparative study of gulf and mediterranean arab
countries. August 2005.

20. 20 REFERENCES
OECD. Oslo Manual: GUIDELINES FOR COLLECTING INNOVATION
DATA. OECD Publishing, 3rd edition, 2005.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD. OECD
Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2000. France, 2000a.
Organization for economic co-coperation and development OECD. Sci-
ence, technology and innovation in the new economy. Policy
Brief: OECD Observer, September 2000b. URL www.oecd.org/
publications/Pol_brief. Last accessed July 2007.
S. Qasem. Strategy for the development of science and Technology in the Arab
world, volume I, chapter 1, pages 11–94. The Arab League Educational,
Cultural and Scientific Organization (ALECSO), Tunis, 2003.
Everett M. Rogers. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York, USA,
fifth edition, 2003.
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization UN-
ESCO. UNESCO Science Report 2005. UNESCO Publishing,
Paris, France, 2005. URL http://www.unesco.org/science/
psd/publications/science_report2005.shtml. Last accessed
September 2006.
United Nations Industrial Development Organization UNIDO. Manual on
Technology Transfer Negotiation. General Studies Series. Vienna, 1996.
United Nations Industrial Development Organization UNIDO. Service
module 2: Investment and technology promotion overview, 2007. URL
http://www.unido.org/doc/5067. Last accessed July 2007.
United States Patents and Trademarks Office USPTO. United states
patents & trademarks office (uspto), 2006. URL http://www.uspto.
gov. Last accessed June 2007.

21. REFERENCES 21
Kevin Watkins, Haishan Fu, Ricardo Fuentes, Arunabha Ghosh, Chiara
Giamberardini, Claes Johansson, Christopher Kuonqui, Andrés Montes,
David Stewart, Cecilia Ugaz, and Shahin Yaqub. Human Development
Report 2005. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), New
York, USA, 2005. URL http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/
2005/. Last accessed September 2006.
Wikipedia the free encyclopedia. Invention, 2007a. URL http://en.
wikipedia.org/wiki/Invention. Last accessed July 2007.
Wikipedia the free encyclopedia. Science, 2007b. URL http://en.
wikipedia.org/wiki/Science. Last accessed July 2007.