This document provides information about European BPW projects and grant opportunities. It discusses the general information about grants from the EU, including eligible beneficiaries and rules. It also describes the annual work program process and application process. The document then discusses theoretical aspects of project management, including definitions of projects and the project cycle. It outlines the analysis and planning phases of project cycle management. Finally, it provides details on some specific BPW Turkey projects that received EU grants, including goals and outcomes.
The document summarizes the findings of the AID-EE project, which evaluated 20 energy efficiency policies across Europe. Key lessons learned include: objectives should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound to guide policy; the impact of individual policies is difficult to isolate as most use packages with interacting instruments; and monitoring and evaluation have been a low priority, despite being important to determine policy effects and efficiency. A policy theory approach that defines clear objectives, indicators and expected relationships can help design, monitor and evaluate policies.
The role of Monitoring and Evaluation in Improving Public Policies – Challeng...UNDP Policy Centre
IPC-IG's Research Coordinator, Fábio Veras Soares, presentation at the "International Conference on the
Institutionalization of Public Policies Evaluation", held in Rabat, on 5 October.
This document discusses policy objectives and formulation using the Logical Framework Approach. It defines key LFA concepts like goals, purposes, outputs, activities and assumptions. Goals are long-term objectives, purposes are benefits the plan seeks to achieve, outputs are tangible deliverables, and activities are actions to achieve outputs. The document also discusses using objective trees to analyze objectives and alternative strategies based on criteria like benefits, costs, feasibility and sustainability. The overall aim is to provide guidance on clarifying objectives and developing education policies and plans.
The document discusses the process of educational policy formulation, implementation, and evaluation. It involves several key phases and steps:
1. The policy formulation process involves determining national objectives, assessing needs according to objectives, finalizing themes and target areas, setting targets based on trend projections, and preparing and publishing the policy.
2. Policy implementation is the dynamic process of converting policies and plans into specific programs and projects. It requires choosing appropriate policy instruments and implementation approaches.
3. Policy evaluation assesses the effects of the policy and provides direction for programs and strategies. It identifies reasons why policies may not be implemented successfully, such as implementation gaps between objectives and outcomes.
The document discusses key concepts related to public policy including definitions of public policy, the aims and nature of public policy, and the policy-making process. It outlines the major steps in the policy-making process including agenda setting, policy formulation, implementation, and evaluation. It also discusses the roles of different players and advocacy in shaping public policy. Lastly, it provides an overview of the legislative process in the Philippine government.
Planning the Evaluation
Impact models
Types of inference and choice of design
Defining the indicators and obtaining the data
Carrying out the evaluation
Disseminating evaluation findings
Working in large-scale evaluations
This document provides information about European BPW projects and grant opportunities. It discusses the general information about grants from the EU, including eligible beneficiaries and rules. It also describes the annual work program process and application process. The document then discusses theoretical aspects of project management, including definitions of projects and the project cycle. It outlines the analysis and planning phases of project cycle management. Finally, it provides details on some specific BPW Turkey projects that received EU grants, including goals and outcomes.
The document summarizes the findings of the AID-EE project, which evaluated 20 energy efficiency policies across Europe. Key lessons learned include: objectives should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound to guide policy; the impact of individual policies is difficult to isolate as most use packages with interacting instruments; and monitoring and evaluation have been a low priority, despite being important to determine policy effects and efficiency. A policy theory approach that defines clear objectives, indicators and expected relationships can help design, monitor and evaluate policies.
The role of Monitoring and Evaluation in Improving Public Policies – Challeng...UNDP Policy Centre
IPC-IG's Research Coordinator, Fábio Veras Soares, presentation at the "International Conference on the
Institutionalization of Public Policies Evaluation", held in Rabat, on 5 October.
This document discusses policy objectives and formulation using the Logical Framework Approach. It defines key LFA concepts like goals, purposes, outputs, activities and assumptions. Goals are long-term objectives, purposes are benefits the plan seeks to achieve, outputs are tangible deliverables, and activities are actions to achieve outputs. The document also discusses using objective trees to analyze objectives and alternative strategies based on criteria like benefits, costs, feasibility and sustainability. The overall aim is to provide guidance on clarifying objectives and developing education policies and plans.
The document discusses the process of educational policy formulation, implementation, and evaluation. It involves several key phases and steps:
1. The policy formulation process involves determining national objectives, assessing needs according to objectives, finalizing themes and target areas, setting targets based on trend projections, and preparing and publishing the policy.
2. Policy implementation is the dynamic process of converting policies and plans into specific programs and projects. It requires choosing appropriate policy instruments and implementation approaches.
3. Policy evaluation assesses the effects of the policy and provides direction for programs and strategies. It identifies reasons why policies may not be implemented successfully, such as implementation gaps between objectives and outcomes.
The document discusses key concepts related to public policy including definitions of public policy, the aims and nature of public policy, and the policy-making process. It outlines the major steps in the policy-making process including agenda setting, policy formulation, implementation, and evaluation. It also discusses the roles of different players and advocacy in shaping public policy. Lastly, it provides an overview of the legislative process in the Philippine government.
Planning the Evaluation
Impact models
Types of inference and choice of design
Defining the indicators and obtaining the data
Carrying out the evaluation
Disseminating evaluation findings
Working in large-scale evaluations
Monitoring and evaluation are important for public works programs to demonstrate results and accountability. Key goals include measuring income gains for workers and their households, skills acquired, and the utility of projects created. Evaluations assess processes, targeting, and impacts using descriptive, normative, and causal methods. Impact evaluations estimate net program effects using control or comparison groups to determine what outcomes would have been in the absence of the program. Careful planning is needed to identify valid comparison groups and measure appropriate indicators at different points over time.
POLICY MAKING PROCESS
Policy
• a statement of intent for achieving an objective.
• Deliberate statement aimed at achieving specific objective
• policies are formulated by the Government in order to provide
a guideline in attaining certain objectives for the benefit of the
people.
• Importance and objective of any policy
• to solve existing challenges/problems in any society
• used as a tool to safeguard and ensure better services to
members of the society.
• Reasons for formulating a Policy
• Reforms (socio-economic, technological advancements, etc)
within and outside the country.
The document discusses the process of public policy. It defines policy and differentiates it from procedures and guidelines. It then outlines the key steps in the public policy process: problem identification, agenda setting, policy making, budgeting, implementation, and evaluation. It notes that key actors in agenda setting include think tanks, interest groups, media, and government officials. The document also discusses who the main players are in making economic policies, noting the roles of the prime minister, donor community, various ministries and constituencies. It provides guidelines for changing policies, emphasizing preparation, planning, personal contact, understanding community perspectives, positivism, participation, publicity, and persistence.
The document discusses policy evaluation, which uses social science research methods like qualitative and quantitative techniques to examine the effects of policies. There are four key criteria for policy evaluation: utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy. The document also outlines the differences between summative and formative evaluation, and provides a 7-step process for conducting policy evaluations that includes defining the purpose, specifying an evaluation design, creating a data collection plan, analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and providing feedback for program improvement.
The Use of Evidence in Developing Countries: Experiences and Challenges - LIDC
This document discusses the need for improving the use of evidence in developing policy in developing countries. It outlines 3ie's goal of supporting better evidence to improve lives. While evaluation is commonly used in other fields like engineering, policy evaluation in areas like education and poverty alleviation is rare. Results are difficult to measure and take a long time to be observed. Politicians and evaluators often have different incentives, with politicians wanting quick results and evaluators wanting rigorous research. Ways to better align these groups include incentivizing implementation of strategies, quicker dissemination of results, and institutionalizing evaluation practice beyond political cycles.
Planning, monitoring & evaluation of health care programarijitkundu88
this presentation is for the basic idea of planning monitoring and evaluation of health care programs. the details steps of planning is covered. i hope it will help all the persons interested in public health and different health programs.
Engaging stakeholders is important for effective climate adaptation for several reasons:
1) Climate adaptation requires making changes that are judged based on both climate impacts and other social and economic factors, which benefits from input from a variety of stakeholders.
2) Implementing adaptation measures often requires collaboration between different groups, mandates, resources, and expertise that are not concentrated in any single entity.
3) Involving stakeholders in the process can increase acceptance of changes and support for adaptation.
Stakeholder engagement may be beneficial at different stages of the adaptation process, including problem identification and analysis, planning interventions, implementation, and evaluation. The stakeholders engaged will depend on the issue and may include social groups, organizations, professionals,
This document discusses policy implementation. It defines implementation as converting policy intentions into actions and outcomes. It describes top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation and categories for identifying problems. Challenges to implementation include lack of support, capacity issues, and barriers like weak political support, poor design, and limited funding. Strategies for managers include designing policies with implementation in mind, mobilizing resources quickly while building capacity, and managing the change process. Understanding context is also important to successful implementation.
Health system strengthening evidence review – A summary of the 2021 updateReBUILD for Resilience
A presentation given by Professor Sophie Witter to the UK government's Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office. This summarises a 2021 review of a health systems strengthening evidence review originally undertaken for the office in 2019.
A Systematic Approach to the Planning, Implementation, Monitoring, and Evalua...MEASURE Evaluation
This document outlines a 6-step approach for monitoring and evaluating integrated health services at the national level. The steps include: 1) defining public health problems, 2) identifying primary points of care, 3) defining interventions and service packages, 4) creating a logic model, 5) conducting research and evaluation, and 6) using data for decision making. Strong M&E systems are needed to manage complexity, assess progress, generate information, refine programs, and produce evidence. National strategies should drive integration based on mortality and morbidity data. Standardized care, quality indicators, and interoperable health information systems are important for monitoring integrated services. Lessons learned should be shared globally.
This document outlines factors that contribute to both the success and failure of social programs. Key factors for success include social acceptability, unity of purpose among all groups, and having a critical mass of supporters. Sufficient resources, clear communication and coordination are also important. Potential barriers include a lack of defined aims or objectives, problematic attitudes, limited resources and support, unpreparedness, and over-reliance on outside help.
This document discusses public policy formulation. It begins with defining policy and outlining the policy formulation process. This includes initiating a policy, forming a task force, diagnosing the situation, drafting the policy, obtaining approval, implementing, and monitoring/evaluating. Key features of a good policy are also described such as legal validity, consistency, feasibility, resources, and social acceptance. The document then discusses Pakistan's experience with policy formulation, noting both successes and weaknesses such as procedural issues, institutional overstepping, lack of evaluation, and inadequate implementation. It concludes by emphasizing the importance of studying existing policies and political party platforms when developing new policies.
Data4Impact expert workshop. The Conceptual Framework of Societal Impact of R&IData4Impact
Data4Impact approach to societal impact of research and innovation. Data4Impact model of societal impact assessment and new indicators of societal impact. Presentation by Fraunhofer ISI.
Lessons Learned from OVC Evaluations for Future Public Health EvaluationsMEASURE Evaluation
Three key lessons learned from OVC (Orphans and Vulnerable Children) evaluations for future public health evaluations:
1) Evaluations need to be designed and incorporated from the beginning of projects rather than as an afterthought, but it is difficult to attract attention to evaluations early on.
2) There are methodological challenges to conducting rigorous impact evaluations of public health programs including non-random placement of programs, lack of suitable control groups, and inability to control for external factors.
3) Evaluations require strong leadership and buy-in from stakeholders to facilitate data collection and use of findings to improve programs. Early and continued engagement of stakeholders is important.
The document discusses evaluation of health programs. It defines evaluation as the systematic acquisition and assessment of information to provide useful feedback. The main goals of evaluation are to influence decision-making and policy formulation through empirically-driven feedback. Formative evaluation assesses needs and implementation, while summative evaluation determines outcomes, impacts, costs and benefits. Evaluation questions, methods, and frameworks are described to establish program merit, worth and significance based on credible evidence from stakeholders. Standards ensure evaluations are useful, feasible, proper and accurate.
While this list represents the desirable attributes of indicators most useful for these purposes, it is recognized that few indicators are likely to meet all of these criteria.
Hence, these criteria serve as a benchmark for weighing the potential costs and benefits of selecting one indicator over another.
Health system strengthening in LMICs and fragile states – what and how?ReBUILD for Resilience
Health system strengthening in low and middle income countries aims to improve health outcomes through strengthening the core functions and building blocks of health systems. Effective interventions strengthen governance, develop human resources, improve health facilities, and deliver high quality services. The evidence shows that multi-component interventions which reinforce each other across building blocks are most effective when designed and implemented through sustained political commitment, community engagement, capacity building, and iterative learning and adaptation to local contexts.
Monitoring and Evaluation system for PFES: Key findings and policy recommenda...CIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation by Pham Thu Thuy, Karen Bennet, Vu Tan Phuong and Le Ngoc Dung shows the key findings for M&E for Environmental Service, Social Impact, PFES contract and financial flows.
103-Basco Identifying metrics to fully assess the impact of federal R&D inves...innovationoecd
The document summarizes a study that used a Delphi method consensus process with panels of US government officials and researchers to identify metrics for measuring the impact of federal R&D investments. The panels rated 58 proposed metrics across academia, government, economy and society in three rounds. 33 metrics met criteria to be considered useful by both panels. 16 metrics were endorsed by both panels, while 7 were endorsed just by government officials and 10 just by researchers. The endorsed metrics covered areas like new products, funding, health outcomes, behavior changes and more.
Pengalaman Melaksanakan Koordinasi Pembangunan Air Minum dan Penyehatan Lingk...Oswar Mungkasa
Dokumen tersebut membahas pengalaman koordinasi pembangunan air minum dan penyehatan lingkungan di Jawa Tengah. Koordinasi dilakukan melalui Kelompok Kerja AMPL di bawah Bappeda dengan melibatkan berbagai instansi terkait. Beberapa kendala yang dihadapi meliputi seringnya pergantian personil, komunikasi yang belum maksimal, serta keterbatasan data. Upaya perbaikan yang dilakukan antara lain meningkatkan kapasitas Kelomp
Monitoring and evaluation are important for public works programs to demonstrate results and accountability. Key goals include measuring income gains for workers and their households, skills acquired, and the utility of projects created. Evaluations assess processes, targeting, and impacts using descriptive, normative, and causal methods. Impact evaluations estimate net program effects using control or comparison groups to determine what outcomes would have been in the absence of the program. Careful planning is needed to identify valid comparison groups and measure appropriate indicators at different points over time.
POLICY MAKING PROCESS
Policy
• a statement of intent for achieving an objective.
• Deliberate statement aimed at achieving specific objective
• policies are formulated by the Government in order to provide
a guideline in attaining certain objectives for the benefit of the
people.
• Importance and objective of any policy
• to solve existing challenges/problems in any society
• used as a tool to safeguard and ensure better services to
members of the society.
• Reasons for formulating a Policy
• Reforms (socio-economic, technological advancements, etc)
within and outside the country.
The document discusses the process of public policy. It defines policy and differentiates it from procedures and guidelines. It then outlines the key steps in the public policy process: problem identification, agenda setting, policy making, budgeting, implementation, and evaluation. It notes that key actors in agenda setting include think tanks, interest groups, media, and government officials. The document also discusses who the main players are in making economic policies, noting the roles of the prime minister, donor community, various ministries and constituencies. It provides guidelines for changing policies, emphasizing preparation, planning, personal contact, understanding community perspectives, positivism, participation, publicity, and persistence.
The document discusses policy evaluation, which uses social science research methods like qualitative and quantitative techniques to examine the effects of policies. There are four key criteria for policy evaluation: utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy. The document also outlines the differences between summative and formative evaluation, and provides a 7-step process for conducting policy evaluations that includes defining the purpose, specifying an evaluation design, creating a data collection plan, analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and providing feedback for program improvement.
The Use of Evidence in Developing Countries: Experiences and Challenges - LIDC
This document discusses the need for improving the use of evidence in developing policy in developing countries. It outlines 3ie's goal of supporting better evidence to improve lives. While evaluation is commonly used in other fields like engineering, policy evaluation in areas like education and poverty alleviation is rare. Results are difficult to measure and take a long time to be observed. Politicians and evaluators often have different incentives, with politicians wanting quick results and evaluators wanting rigorous research. Ways to better align these groups include incentivizing implementation of strategies, quicker dissemination of results, and institutionalizing evaluation practice beyond political cycles.
Planning, monitoring & evaluation of health care programarijitkundu88
this presentation is for the basic idea of planning monitoring and evaluation of health care programs. the details steps of planning is covered. i hope it will help all the persons interested in public health and different health programs.
Engaging stakeholders is important for effective climate adaptation for several reasons:
1) Climate adaptation requires making changes that are judged based on both climate impacts and other social and economic factors, which benefits from input from a variety of stakeholders.
2) Implementing adaptation measures often requires collaboration between different groups, mandates, resources, and expertise that are not concentrated in any single entity.
3) Involving stakeholders in the process can increase acceptance of changes and support for adaptation.
Stakeholder engagement may be beneficial at different stages of the adaptation process, including problem identification and analysis, planning interventions, implementation, and evaluation. The stakeholders engaged will depend on the issue and may include social groups, organizations, professionals,
This document discusses policy implementation. It defines implementation as converting policy intentions into actions and outcomes. It describes top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation and categories for identifying problems. Challenges to implementation include lack of support, capacity issues, and barriers like weak political support, poor design, and limited funding. Strategies for managers include designing policies with implementation in mind, mobilizing resources quickly while building capacity, and managing the change process. Understanding context is also important to successful implementation.
Health system strengthening evidence review – A summary of the 2021 updateReBUILD for Resilience
A presentation given by Professor Sophie Witter to the UK government's Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office. This summarises a 2021 review of a health systems strengthening evidence review originally undertaken for the office in 2019.
A Systematic Approach to the Planning, Implementation, Monitoring, and Evalua...MEASURE Evaluation
This document outlines a 6-step approach for monitoring and evaluating integrated health services at the national level. The steps include: 1) defining public health problems, 2) identifying primary points of care, 3) defining interventions and service packages, 4) creating a logic model, 5) conducting research and evaluation, and 6) using data for decision making. Strong M&E systems are needed to manage complexity, assess progress, generate information, refine programs, and produce evidence. National strategies should drive integration based on mortality and morbidity data. Standardized care, quality indicators, and interoperable health information systems are important for monitoring integrated services. Lessons learned should be shared globally.
This document outlines factors that contribute to both the success and failure of social programs. Key factors for success include social acceptability, unity of purpose among all groups, and having a critical mass of supporters. Sufficient resources, clear communication and coordination are also important. Potential barriers include a lack of defined aims or objectives, problematic attitudes, limited resources and support, unpreparedness, and over-reliance on outside help.
This document discusses public policy formulation. It begins with defining policy and outlining the policy formulation process. This includes initiating a policy, forming a task force, diagnosing the situation, drafting the policy, obtaining approval, implementing, and monitoring/evaluating. Key features of a good policy are also described such as legal validity, consistency, feasibility, resources, and social acceptance. The document then discusses Pakistan's experience with policy formulation, noting both successes and weaknesses such as procedural issues, institutional overstepping, lack of evaluation, and inadequate implementation. It concludes by emphasizing the importance of studying existing policies and political party platforms when developing new policies.
Data4Impact expert workshop. The Conceptual Framework of Societal Impact of R&IData4Impact
Data4Impact approach to societal impact of research and innovation. Data4Impact model of societal impact assessment and new indicators of societal impact. Presentation by Fraunhofer ISI.
Lessons Learned from OVC Evaluations for Future Public Health EvaluationsMEASURE Evaluation
Three key lessons learned from OVC (Orphans and Vulnerable Children) evaluations for future public health evaluations:
1) Evaluations need to be designed and incorporated from the beginning of projects rather than as an afterthought, but it is difficult to attract attention to evaluations early on.
2) There are methodological challenges to conducting rigorous impact evaluations of public health programs including non-random placement of programs, lack of suitable control groups, and inability to control for external factors.
3) Evaluations require strong leadership and buy-in from stakeholders to facilitate data collection and use of findings to improve programs. Early and continued engagement of stakeholders is important.
The document discusses evaluation of health programs. It defines evaluation as the systematic acquisition and assessment of information to provide useful feedback. The main goals of evaluation are to influence decision-making and policy formulation through empirically-driven feedback. Formative evaluation assesses needs and implementation, while summative evaluation determines outcomes, impacts, costs and benefits. Evaluation questions, methods, and frameworks are described to establish program merit, worth and significance based on credible evidence from stakeholders. Standards ensure evaluations are useful, feasible, proper and accurate.
While this list represents the desirable attributes of indicators most useful for these purposes, it is recognized that few indicators are likely to meet all of these criteria.
Hence, these criteria serve as a benchmark for weighing the potential costs and benefits of selecting one indicator over another.
Health system strengthening in LMICs and fragile states – what and how?ReBUILD for Resilience
Health system strengthening in low and middle income countries aims to improve health outcomes through strengthening the core functions and building blocks of health systems. Effective interventions strengthen governance, develop human resources, improve health facilities, and deliver high quality services. The evidence shows that multi-component interventions which reinforce each other across building blocks are most effective when designed and implemented through sustained political commitment, community engagement, capacity building, and iterative learning and adaptation to local contexts.
Monitoring and Evaluation system for PFES: Key findings and policy recommenda...CIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation by Pham Thu Thuy, Karen Bennet, Vu Tan Phuong and Le Ngoc Dung shows the key findings for M&E for Environmental Service, Social Impact, PFES contract and financial flows.
103-Basco Identifying metrics to fully assess the impact of federal R&D inves...innovationoecd
The document summarizes a study that used a Delphi method consensus process with panels of US government officials and researchers to identify metrics for measuring the impact of federal R&D investments. The panels rated 58 proposed metrics across academia, government, economy and society in three rounds. 33 metrics met criteria to be considered useful by both panels. 16 metrics were endorsed by both panels, while 7 were endorsed just by government officials and 10 just by researchers. The endorsed metrics covered areas like new products, funding, health outcomes, behavior changes and more.
Pengalaman Melaksanakan Koordinasi Pembangunan Air Minum dan Penyehatan Lingk...Oswar Mungkasa
Dokumen tersebut membahas pengalaman koordinasi pembangunan air minum dan penyehatan lingkungan di Jawa Tengah. Koordinasi dilakukan melalui Kelompok Kerja AMPL di bawah Bappeda dengan melibatkan berbagai instansi terkait. Beberapa kendala yang dihadapi meliputi seringnya pergantian personil, komunikasi yang belum maksimal, serta keterbatasan data. Upaya perbaikan yang dilakukan antara lain meningkatkan kapasitas Kelomp
Stakeholder engagement is the process of involving stakeholders to discuss and direct efforts towards a specific outcome. The level and nature of engagement depends on the project goals. For simple projects, engagement may only require fact sheets and brief meetings, while more complex projects require greater collaboration over time to build relationships. There are different levels of engagement, from simply informing stakeholders to co-deciding with them. Effective stakeholder engagement follows key principles like setting clear goals, defining stakeholders, managing expectations, using group discussion, providing varied information formats, allowing mutual influence, and maintaining feedback.
The document provides an introduction to fundraising and discusses various funding sources for projects, including EU funds. It examines requirements for developing successful funding proposals, such as stakeholder analysis and logical framework analysis. Key points covered include identifying relevant funding programs, understanding donor priorities, following proposal guidelines, and developing problem statements, objectives, activities and indicators for proposals. The document emphasizes aligning proposals with donor issues and providing clear benefits.
Dealing with Disruptive Change: The Power of Stakeholder ConnectionsColin Habberton
This document discusses how non-profits can deal with disruptive change by connecting with stakeholders. It provides an overview of the session, which will investigate causes of disruptive change through case studies and discuss how stakeholder connections can manage risk and create solutions. The session will help fundraisers understand disruptive change, use diagnostic tools to engage stakeholders, and build collaborative responses. A case study of Habitat for Humanity SA is presented, which showed how shifting its focus from building houses to building communities allowed it to better scale its impact and operations. The document recommends that organizations innovate through collaboration, invest in people and systems, and implement changes through pilots and training to deal with disruptive change.
This document provides guidance for conducting a stakeholder analysis to help conservation organizations better understand the human communities where they work. It outlines a 7-step process to identify key stakeholders and their interests, prioritize stakeholders, assess each priority stakeholder, and develop communication strategies. It also stresses the importance of understanding the organization's history in the area and gathering demographic data on the community to provide context before conducting the analysis.
Amid growing competition, decreased funding sources, and more and increasingly complex social challenges, nonprofit leaders must reinvent themselves. They must unlock the charity shackles, embrace strategy and impact, use money as a tool, refuse to play nice and demand real help. We need a new kind of nonprofit leader.
Yoap organizational fundraising initiative(yofi)Mohamed Ahmed
1) The document discusses a local resource mobilization initiative called YOFI by the organization YOAP to combat Somali youth piracy through empowering youth.
2) YOAP aims to mobilize local resources and involve key stakeholders like government, businesses, communities in an inclusive approach rather than waiting for external funding.
3) The identified key stakeholders include government bodies, businesses, communities, religious leaders, civil society, and the international community, with youth being both direct victims and causes of piracy.
This document provides information about the Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply's (CIPS) Advanced Diploma in Procurement and Supply qualification. It outlines the compulsory and optional units that make up the qualification, as well as guidance on entry requirements, assessment methods, guided learning hours, and definitions of key terms related to CIPS qualifications.
To get out of the starvation cycle, nonprofits must raise money to build a stronger nonprofit organization. This is capacity capital. Here's how to raise it.
Without a clear guide for diversified fundraising activities it is difficult to follow a path for success and convey needed fundraising efforts throughout your organization. Understanding various funding opportunities, the pros and cons of funding sources, and developing a plan will help to direct your efforts. Join in on a hands-on conversation about funding opportunities, best practices, and how these options fit within organizational sustainability.
Malnutrition project proposal ( Increasing knowlege about importance of a bal...Oriba Dan Langoya
This is a project proposal implemented by Students of Makerere University Under Community Based and Education Research (COBERS)
Meeting the Nutrition requirements of children aged 6months to five years has become a major global
challenge and as such an estimate of 55 million pre- school children globally are malnourished. In 2010,
the nutrition status of children under five in Uganda was estimated to be 38% stunted, 16% acutely
malnourished and 19% undernourished and by 2011 the statistics stand at 33% for stunting,5% for
wasting ,14% for underweight, vitamin A deficiency at 38%. The current levels of malnutrition hinder
Uganda’s human, social, and economic development.
Pedoman umum program kotaku sesuai SE DJCK No 40/2016ayi sugandhi
Program Kota Tanpa Kumuh (KOTAKU) bertujuan untuk meningkatkan akses terhadap infrastruktur dan pelayanan dasar di permukiman kumuh perkotaan guna mendukung permukiman yang layak huni, produktif dan berkelanjutan melalui kolaborasi antara pemerintah pusat, provinsi, kota/kabupaten, masyarakat dan pemangku kepentingan lainnya."
Dokumen tersebut membahas tentang latar belakang pentingnya kesehatan dan puskesmas sebagai sarana pelayanan kesehatan primer. Dibahas pula profil, visi misi, wilayah kerja, struktur organisasi, sumber daya, dan analisis sistem puskesmas Buniwangi."
Details benefits of monitoring and evaluation, and how institutional knowledge is built overtime, thus can used in the design, running and effectively delivering development goals.
Final Class Presentation on Determining Project Stakeholders & Risks.pptxGeorgeKabongah2
“A person or group of people who have a vested interest in the success of an organization or project and the environment in which the organization/ project operates”
Stakeholders are persons, groups or institutions with interests in a project or program.
The document summarizes information about Horizon 2020, the EU's research and innovation program from 2014-2020. Key points include:
- Horizon 2020 brings together separate EU programs on research, innovation, and the European Institute of Innovation and Technology.
- It focuses on societal challenges like health and ageing through its three priorities of excellent science, industrial leadership, and societal challenges.
- The health theme has a proposed budget of €7.47 billion for 2014-2020 and focuses on areas like active and healthy ageing, personalized medicine, and improving health systems.
- The 2014-2015 work program includes calls on topics like innovative therapies, eHealth, and independent living for the elderly.
Presentation from Attilio Orecchio and Alessandro Carbone (ThinkEurope Consulting) about european project design, logical frame approach and important keywords
How to write an development project evaluation report. Format and principle guidelines for mid-term and for completed projects. This format can be used for any kind of development project.
This document discusses eHealth strategies and the benefits they provide to patients, healthcare providers, and health systems. It analyzes the key stakeholders in large-scale eHealth projects, including primary/secondary healthcare centers, health insurances, hospitals, pharmacies, and nursing homes. Large eHealth projects involve many institutions that each have their own goals and agendas. Successful projects require identifying these stakeholders, describing the system benefits for each, and finding solutions that balance their various requirements through transparency and discussion.
The document presents an evaluation framework for assessing the JISC Business and Community Engagement (BCE) programme. It identifies key outcomes and impacts to evaluate at the programme, workstream, and project levels. These include impacts on strategies, activities, and wider engagement. The framework provides an initial assessment of the type of impacts each workstream may have. Evaluation should be an ongoing process throughout project delivery and involve external independent evaluators and stakeholders.
A transdisciplinary research hand injuries in Bangladesh final May22.pptxVaikunthan Rajaratnam
This document proposes a transdisciplinary research approach to understand the impact of work-related hand injuries in Bangladesh. It involves a 6-phase process including an exploratory phase of interviews and focus groups with injured workers and stakeholders to understand the problems. A consultation phase would identify and engage stakeholders to analyze the knowledge and develop solutions. Stakeholders would then prioritize, rank, and agree on problems to address and potential interventions through an integrative process. An action plan would be developed, implemented as a pilot program, and evaluated to generate strategies to optimize hand injury care. The research aims to comprehensively address this issue through an inclusive, participatory process involving both experts and those impacted.
Monitoring involves continuous assessment of project implementation to provide feedback and identify successes and problems. It focuses on schedules, inputs, and services. Evaluation assesses outcomes, impacts, effectiveness, and sustainability. The document discusses the importance of monitoring and evaluation for improving decision-making, achieving outcomes, and organizational learning. It provides definitions and comparisons of monitoring and evaluation. Participatory approaches are emphasized to empower stakeholders. Clear objectives and indicators are needed to measure progress.
The document is an evaluation of a project proposal for a private nursery, pre-primary, and primary school for underprivileged children in Dodoma, Tanzania. The evaluation finds that the proposal is not well organized, missing important components like feasibility analysis, stakeholder analysis, risk assessment, and implementation plan. It also lacks a clear alignment with objectives, cost-benefit analysis, and monitoring and evaluation framework. In conclusion, the proposal requires significant improvements to its structure, content, and logical framework before it can be properly assessed.
Global Poverty Action Fund (GPAF) Funding SeminarNIDOS
This document provides information about a funding seminar hosted by the Global Poverty Action Fund (GPAF) regarding their Community Partnership Window funding opportunity. The seminar aims to clarify GPAF funding guidelines and the key factors considered in assessing concept notes. Eligible projects must fit GPAF objectives of poverty reduction, empowerment, and accountability. Applicants submit a concept note that undergoes a review process before selection of full proposals. The concept note is evaluated on potential poverty impact, implementation arrangements, value for money, and inclusion of women and girls. Full proposals require additional documentation and are appraised on criteria like context analysis, poverty impact, and sustainability.
The evaluation will assess the impact of Oxfam's 15-month disaster risk reduction programme in Armenia and Georgia. It will focus on the programme's overall impact, effectiveness in promoting gender equality and sustainability. The evaluator will participate in workshops, conduct field visits and interviews, and produce a report evaluating the programme's achievements, challenges, lessons learned and recommendations. Key areas of analysis include the programme's outcomes, gender impacts, sustainability, cost-effectiveness, best practices, government coordination and integration with other initiatives.
The document discusses the benefits of environmental impact assessments (EIAs). It outlines 5 main benefits: 1) better environmental planning and design of projects, 2) ensuring compliance with environmental standards, 3) savings in capital and operating costs, 4) reduced time and costs of project approvals, and 5) increased project acceptance by the public. It also discusses key principles of EIAs, including that they should be purposive, focused, adaptive, participative, transparent, rigorous, practical, credible, and efficient. Finally, it outlines the main stakeholders involved in EIAs, including proponents, government agencies, NGOs, interested groups, and affected communities.
This document provides an overview of basic concepts in health planning. It discusses that health planning is a process that culminates in decisions around future health facilities and services to meet community needs. There are different types of planning based on time frame (short, medium, long term) and hierarchy of goals (health policy, program, operational). Effective health planning is multidisciplinary, takes a multisectoral approach, and involves teamwork. The key steps in health planning include situation analysis, problem identification and prioritization, setting goals and targets, determining and analyzing strategies, identifying major activities, developing a budget, and establishing monitoring and evaluation.
This presentation was given at the Sustainable Brands Africa Conference in May 2016. It provides case studies and lessons learnt of conducting numerous impact assessments. It also provides advice of how to conduct impact assessments, what indicators to consider and how to determine return on investment
This document outlines the planning process for public health students. It defines planning and health planning, discusses different types of planning based on repetitiveness, time, and scope. The document also covers the basic steps of health planning including situational analysis, priority setting, objective and target setting, identifying limitations, designing strategies, and writing an action plan. Key aspects of planning like SWOT analysis and outcomes such as mission, vision, goals and objectives are explained. The overall summary is that the document provides an overview of the planning process for public health, defining terms and outlining the main steps.
Impact assessment is the analysis of lasting changes in people's lives caused by an intervention. It differs from project monitoring, which assesses progress, and evaluation, which measures objectives. Impact assessment is challenging due to the complexity of attributing changes, accounting for context, establishing baselines, and measuring unintended consequences. Longitudinal studies are needed to truly assess lasting impact over time.
Social policy analysis uses various methods to evaluate policies and their impact. Policy analysts conduct needs assessments, evaluate outcomes, and use case studies and content analysis. The goal is to understand problems policies aim to address, determine if objectives are met, and identify unintended consequences. Analysts may also use grounded theory to uncover themes in policies and develop theories about values and ideologies underlying them. Overall, social policy analysis provides a way to critically examine social problems, policies, and services to promote social justice and improve people's quality of life.
The document provides an overview of a briefing on impact investment from Next Generation Consultants. Some key points:
1) The briefing discusses the need for an impact investment index for Africa that takes into account the complexities of development contexts on the continent. Existing global models of impact measurement are not always applicable.
2) The proposed Impact Investment Index aims to create a shared performance measurement system for social investment and community development organizations to improve coordination, reduce costs, and better assess collective impact.
3) Impact assessments should distinguish between measuring performance, outcomes, and long-term impacts. The ultimate goal is to understand the tangible and intangible effects of investments and determine what changes can be attributed to interventions.
Non-governmental, non-profit, public or voluntary organizations may formally contribute to the work of the United Nations after being granted consultative status with the Economic and Social Council under Article 71 of the Charter of the United Nations and on Economic and Social Council Resolution 1996/31
In the 20th century, one of the greatest changes to democracy around the World was the inclusion of increasing numbers of women, both as voters and as members of parliaments.
The document discusses gender issues in international water laws and governance. It notes that women disproportionately bear the burden of water scarcity as they are primarily responsible for household water collection. While women play an important role in water management, they are often absent from water policy and decision-making. Several international conferences and agreements, including the Dublin Principles, Beijing Platform for Action, and Millennium Development Goals, have recognized the need to involve women in water governance and ensure their access to water. However, more work is still needed to fully integrate a gender perspective into water policies and programs.
Women make up a significant portion of the agricultural workforce in developing countries, ranging from 20% in Latin America to over 50% in some parts of Africa and Asia. They perform many agricultural tasks like crop farming, animal husbandry, food processing, and household chores. However, female farmers often have less access to resources like land, credit, education, and extension services compared to male farmers. As a result, yields are typically 20-30% lower for women compared to men cultivating the same plots. Closing this gender gap in agriculture could increase overall production by 2.5-4% and reduce global hunger by 12-17%. Organizations are working to promote gender equality and empower women in the agricultural sector to reduce
Women face disadvantages related to the environment and natural resources due to traditional gender roles. They spend significant time collecting water, fuel, and farming without secure land rights. This limits their time for other activities and subjects them to health and safety risks. Integrating gender considerations into environmental policies and increasing women's access to resources and decision making can improve environmental sustainability and reduce poverty and hunger.
Integrity in leadership builds trust by ensuring consistency between words an...Ram V Chary
Integrity in leadership builds trust by ensuring consistency between words and actions, making leaders reliable and credible. It also ensures ethical decision-making, which fosters a positive organizational culture and promotes long-term success. #RamVChary
Make it or Break it - Insights for achieving Product-market fit .pdfResonate Digital
This presentation was used in talks in various startup and SMB events, focusing on achieving product-market fit by prioritizing customer needs over your solution. It stresses the importance of engaging with your target audience directly. It also provides techniques for interviewing customers, leveraging Jobs To Be Done for insights, and refining product positioning and features to drive customer adoption.
12 steps to transform your organization into the agile org you deservePierre E. NEIS
During an organizational transformation, the shift is from the previous state to an improved one. In the realm of agility, I emphasize the significance of identifying polarities. This approach helps establish a clear understanding of your objectives. I have outlined 12 incremental actions to delineate your organizational strategy.
Org Design is a core skill to be mastered by management for any successful org change.
Org Topologies™ in its essence is a two-dimensional space with 16 distinctive boxes - atomic organizational archetypes. That space helps you to plot your current operating model by positioning individuals, departments, and teams on the map. This will give a profound understanding of the performance of your value-creating organizational ecosystem.
Enriching engagement with ethical review processesstrikingabalance
New ethics review processes at the University of Bath. Presented at the 8th World Conference on Research Integrity by Filipa Vance, Head of Research Governance and Compliance at the University of Bath. June 2024, Athens
Ganpati Kumar Choudhary Indian Ethos PPT.pptx, The Dilemma of Green Energy Corporation
Green Energy Corporation, a leading renewable energy company, faces a dilemma: balancing profitability and sustainability. Pressure to scale rapidly has led to ethical concerns, as the company's commitment to sustainable practices is tested by the need to satisfy shareholders and maintain a competitive edge.
Public Speaking Tips to Help You Be A Strong Leader.pdfPinta Partners
In the realm of effective leadership, a multitude of skills come into play, but one stands out as both crucial and challenging: public speaking.
Public speaking transcends mere eloquence; it serves as the medium through which leaders articulate their vision, inspire action, and foster engagement. For leaders, refining public speaking skills is essential, elevating their ability to influence, persuade, and lead with resolute conviction. Here are some key tips to consider: https://joellandau.com/the-public-speaking-tips-to-help-you-be-a-stronger-leader/
Sethurathnam Ravi: A Legacy in Finance and LeadershipAnjana Josie
Sethurathnam Ravi, also known as S Ravi, is a distinguished Chartered Accountant and former Chairman of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). As the Founder and Managing Partner of Ravi Rajan & Co. LLP, he has made significant contributions to the fields of finance, banking, and corporate governance. His extensive career includes directorships in over 45 major organizations, including LIC, BHEL, and ONGC. With a passion for financial consulting and social issues, S Ravi continues to influence the industry and inspire future leaders.
Comparing Stability and Sustainability in Agile SystemsRob Healy
Copy of the presentation given at XP2024 based on a research paper.
In this paper we explain wat overwork is and the physical and mental health risks associated with it.
We then explore how overwork relates to system stability and inventory.
Finally there is a call to action for Team Leads / Scrum Masters / Managers to measure and monitor excess work for individual teams.
A presentation on mastering key management concepts across projects, products, programs, and portfolios. Whether you're an aspiring manager or looking to enhance your skills, this session will provide you with the knowledge and tools to succeed in various management roles. Learn about the distinct lifecycles, methodologies, and essential skillsets needed to thrive in today's dynamic business environment.
Specific ServPoints should be tailored for restaurants in all food service segments. Your ServPoints should be the centerpiece of brand delivery training (guest service) and align with your brand position and marketing initiatives, especially in high-labor-cost conditions.
408-784-7371
Foodservice Consulting + Design
Employment PracticesRegulation and Multinational CorporationsRoopaTemkar
Employment PracticesRegulation and Multinational Corporations
Strategic decision making within MNCs constrained or determined by the implementation of laws and codes of practice and by pressure from political actors. Managers in MNCs have to make choices that are shaped by gvmt. intervention and the local economy.
3. Grants
for to implement projects or activities
in relation to
European Union Policies
within different fields such as
research, education, health, consumer
protection, protection of the environment,
humanitarian aid, human rights and etc.
5. Grants
are a form of
complementary financing.
The EU does not finance projects up to 100%;
It is not a profit for their beneficiaries;
It is not for previous actions that are already completed.
Generally
only one grant
for the same action
6. Before 31 March each year,
annual work programme
İncluding
area of activity, objectives, timetable,
available budget, award conditions, etc….
7. By the official calls for proposals,
candidates invites to present a
proposal for action within a
given deadline
that corresponds to the
objectives pursued and
fulfils the
required conditions.
8. All applications are examined and evaluated
on the basis of
criteria
that have clearly been announced
ensuring equal treatment;
candidates are individually
informed
the final decision concerning their proposal
9. Grants without a call for
proposals
for the
Beneficiaries
with
specific competences or characteristics
for
certain actions
or
emergency nature of the action.
10. Grants are made with public money,
the European Commission publish the list of
grants for the previous years
within
the principle of transparency
by
30 June of each year,
11. The EUprovides funding and grants
for
a broad range of projects and programs
covering
different areas such as
human rights including gender equality,
life long learning programmes including vocational trainings,
health, consumer protection,
environmental protection
and
EU's priorities
such as
active citizenship concept
and
rural development
12. Funding
is managed according to strict rules
to ensure tight control over
how funds are spent
in
a transparent& accountable
manner
13. 28 EU Commissioners
have
the ultimate political responsibility
for to ensure
EU funds are spent properly.
at country level
national governments
are
responsible for
conducting checks
and
annual audits
14. Over 76% of the EU budget is
used for
structural funds
with
different types of programs
managed by different bodies
such as
rural development and
social and training programs
15. EU-funds
for
to buy services, goods or works
for
the operations of EU institutions or programs
Public Contracts
through calls for tenders (public procurement)
for
technical assistance, consultancy, conference organisation,
IT equipment purchases, etc.
16. Project Cycle Management
(PCM)
PCM is divided into different project phases
from
programming, through formulation to evaluation and
auditing.
Project Manager
have to be familiar with all different phases of
PCM
to implement and manage an EU funded projects
successfully
and
to fulfil the requirements of the European Commission.
17. Logical Framework Approach
(LFA)
is a very effective
analytical and managerial
tool
within
Project Cycle Management
for
to developand implement
the Project
successfully.
18. Analysis Phase
including
analysis of problem,
analysis of goals,
analysis of strategies,
analysis of stakeholders.
Determination Phase
including
determination of activities,
determination of budget,
determination of logical framework
by
predicting indicators, prerequisites, assumptions and
possible risks
19. In between
Analysis and Determination Phases,
work packages
should be determined.
At least 4 common work packages are often used
Evaluation and Monitoring ( for interim reports, final
report, financial evaluation etc)
Sustainability ( activities to provide institutional, financial and
environmental sustainability of the projects)
Dissemination ( activities for to disseminate Project
outcomes and visibility of EU)
Social Marketting (Activities for to increase participation of
beneficiaries to the Project)
20. Before moving over determination phase
inputs
such as
human resources, equipments, subcontractors..
and
outputs
such as
number of beneficiaries, workshops, promotion
materials, reports, questionnaries..
for
each work package
22. WHAT IS PROJECT?
It is the group of activities that
realize in specified place, in
specified period of time within
the specified budget in order to
achieve specified goal.
23. WHAT IS PROJECT CYCLE
MANAGEMENT?
By resting the integrated
methodology for to prepare,
implement and evaluate the
proposed Project in the framework
of logical framework approach for
to provide quality, effectiveness
and efficiency from the beginning
to the end.
25. FUNCTIONAL GRADES
for PCM
1st Grade: Analysis Grade includes analyses
of fundamental problem, relevant
stakeholders, final goal, strategies,
activities, input-output stability.
2nd Grade: Planning Grade includes
determination of projects’ activity plan,
logical framework matrix and budget in
details.
26. ANALYSIS GRADE of PCM
1. Step: Analysis of specified problem
2. Step : Analysis of target goal
3. Step : Analysis of partnership
4. Step : Analysis of proposed
strategy
27. Analysis of Specified Problem
It is the analysis of current
situation in order to clarify all
the reasons of specified
problem in details.
28. The procedures for to
analyze specified problem
Determinations of all the reasons
related with the specified
problem that we want to change,
The major problem places at the
top of the tree,
All the causalities place at the
trees from top to bottom (the
reasons that cause the same
problem place at the same level).
29. Problem Tree29
High infant
dead rate
Increasing in
the number of
severe infection
cases
Epidemic
Diseaseas
Malnutrition
The lack of the
services for
preventive
vaccination
The problems in
drinking water
supply
The problems
for to access
national
health-care
services
RESULT
REASON
Lack of
knowledge
of the
mothers
about child-
care
The lack of
capacity in
public
medical
institutions
Incapacity in
infrastructure
investmentsLow income
level of the
habitants
30. The Analysis of target goal
It is the methodological
approach to identify final goal
by re-expressing the problems
that are classified in problem
tree, favorably.
31. Target Goal Tree31
Reducing
infant dead
rateDecreasing in the
number of severe
infection cases
Decreasing in
epidemic
diseaseas
Improving in
malnutrition
Improving the
public services for
preventive
vaccination
Providing
supporting
information for
to supply safe
drinking water
Providing
services for to
enable national
health-care
service
PURPOSE
STRATEGIES
Providing services
to increase
awareness of the
mothers about
child-care
Providing
services to
compensate low
capacities of
public
medical
institutions
Attempting for
to increase the
capacity of
infrastructure
Attempting for
to increase
income level of
the habitants
32. The Analysis of proposed
strategies
Strategy is the tool that should be used in
order to reach final goal within specified
intervention area in the framework of the
Projects’ proposal (according to
duration, budget and political restraints
that we face with).
In target goal tree, the tools that we
place under the common goal of the
project, are the alternative strategies of
the Project.
33. Strategies
In order to determine the common
strategy(s), all of the alternative
strategies that were placed in the
tree of target goal should be
evaluated in the framework of
duration, budget, capacity of the
partnership, technologic
practicability, urgency,
complementary issues, snow-ball
effects, economic, political and
social restraints.
34. Analysis of stakeholders
“Stakeholder” means that all
relevant institutions, organizations
and groups that are effected by the
specified problem and/or have
impact on the target goal in
negative or affirmative manner.
35. STAKEHOLDERS
Primary Stakeholders: The groups that
will be influenced by the results of the
Project perniciously or favorably. Target
group, and final beneficiaries are
accepted as primary stakeholders.
Secondary Stakeholders: They are the
organizations and institutions in the
partnership in order to provide services
to the target group through the
implementation process.
36. Primary Stakeholders
Target Group: The group that are
influenced by the current situation
perniciously. They will be
influenced by the results of the
Project favorably.
Final Beneficiaries: The group that
probably influenced by the results
of the Project in long-term.
37. Secondary Stakeholders
Associate Partners: The institutions,
organizations that will implement the
project and/or provide supports to
the applicant organizations by using
the Projects’ fund.
Contributory Partners: Institutions and
organizations (mostly public) that
have a role to solve the specified
problem of the Project without using
the Projects’ fund.
38. Projects’ Activities
Projects’ activities are the tools that are used to
achieve Projects’ goal(s). There is a distinctive
difference between Project and Activity. For
example,
“The Conference to increase environmental
awareness of the society “
Where;
The Conference is the activity while the Increasing
environmental awareness is the title of Project
(including many other activities besides the
Conference to achieve final goal)
39. Gathering Projects’
Activities into Groups
The group of activities for
preperation: The activities for to
enable convenient background for
the proposed Project, determination
of job definitions of the partnership,
revision of activity plan, preparing of
contracts for purchase etc.
40. Gathering Projects’ Activities
into Groups
Evaluation and Monitoring:
The activities that are
necessary to increase
effectiveness and efficiency of
the Project such as reporting,
financial auditing and etc.
41. Gathering Projects’ Activities
into Groups
Social Marketing Activities: The
activities that are realized to
increase participation of the
target group to the Project.
Activities for Sustainability: The
activities to provide continuity of
the projects’ results after the
funding of Project will be ended.
42. Gathering Projects’ Activities
into Groups
Promotion and Dissemination
Activities: The activities to
increase awareness of the
Projects’ goals and outcomes as
well as the priorities and
philosophy of funding institution.
43. PLANNING GRADE of PCM
1st STEP: Planning of Activities
2nd STEP: Planning of Projects’
expenses (budgeting)
3rd STEP: Planning Logical
Framework Matrix
44. PLANNING of PROJECTS’
ACTIVITIES
Activity Plan is the logical diagram
chart that should be developed to
present all project activities
according to interconnected in
each others within the period of
implementations by emphasizing
the responsible partner.
46. Planning of Projects’ expenses
(budgeting)
After planning activities, the
required sources for to realize
these activities in terms of human
resources, equipment, materials,
outsourcing and general
managerial expenses should be
defined in order to determine total
budgeting of the Project.
47. Major Budgetary Items (EU-
funds)
Human Resource
Travel and Accommodation
Equipment and Material
Local Office/Projects’ Expenses
Expenses for outsourcing services
Administrative Expenses
Others
48. Logical Framework
Approach
The important points of the proposed
Project are placed into the matrix;
The scope of the Project
Performance Indicators
Activities and Tools
Assumptions for to achieve final goal
49. Logical Framework Approach
The required sources for the validation
of Project’s results
The expenses of the Project
Prerequisites for to achieve final goal
50. 50
The Matrix of Logical Framework
Performance
Indicators
The sources for
the validation of
Project’s results
Assumptions
Assumptions
Indicators
The sources
for the
validatio
Assumptions
Indicators
The sources
for the
validatio
Assumptions
Indicators
The sources
for the
validation
Results
Overall
Goal
Objective of
the Project
Activities Tools Costs
Prerequisites
Scope of the
Project
52. PEARL Project; Pace to Employment and Assurance for a
Respectable Life - Strengthening Civil society in the Pre-
Accession Process: NGO Grant Facility Programme’s
Promotion and Protection of women’s Rights Grant Scheme/
Ref. No: NGO-A1-73/
To increase the employment possibility of female students
living in the orphans through vocational training courses in 9
different areas,
To enable them to be world citizens with self-confidence
through Personal Empowerment Program,
To increase awareness about gender equality at institutional
level,
To make the orphanages gain the formation of continuous
education centres
7 workshops were established and required equipment were
provided in the scope of the project.
53. Solution Time for Employment Problem (STEP) -
CFCU/TR0604.01/01, The Promotion of Civil Society Dialogue
between EU and Turkey Programme within the scope of
“Youth Initiatives for Dialogue” component to the
Programme.
STEP Project aimed to provide a step for youngsters by
enabling them to pro-active and intervene on Youth Policies
and Employment Problems.
The main outcome of the project was an E-Dialogue Platform
serving actively to Youth and Youth Platforms throughout
Europe.
54. Civil Initiative Strategic Research Center, (SISAM), TR0801.08-
02/27
To promote collaboration between NGOs working for gender
equality and increase their effectiveness on national decision
making mechanisms,
To make contributions to the activities that are realised to
promote participatory democracy in Turkey.
At high level International Conference has been organized for 2
days (supported by the Director UN Global Compact Georg Kell
and United States Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women's
Issues Melanne Verveer) in order to promote “The Women
Empowerment Principles”.
55. B-PLAN-Build Personal Labour Acting in Net, 504648-LLP-1-2009-1-
IT-LEONARDO-LPM /
B-Plan is a guidance methodology aiming at strengthening the
individual awareness on the entrepreneurial skills necessary to
start-up a successful business mainly among underrepresented
individuals like as youth, women, people with migrant
background or formally low skilled.
B-Plan Guidance Model was based on 8 Work-packages,
implemented in 27 months, the first four dedicated to the
development phases, and the last four related to the
fundamental dissemination and exploitation phases, and to the
management and the quality planning.