Practice and Predictors of selfmedication among urban and rural
adults in Sri Lanka, three decades
after Market Economic Reforms
Dr. Pushpa Ranjan Wijesinghe
MD- Rostov (General Medicine)
MSc, MD-Colombo (Community Medicine)
MPH-New Zealand ( Bio-security)
Background
• Practice of self-medication in communities in varying
•
•
•
•

degrees
Increased private sector involvement in health &
pharmaceutical care since 1977
Increased utilization of private health / pharmaceutical
care for out patient conditions
Competition of the pharmaceutical companies for a
larger share of over the counter drug market
What is the status of self-medication in settings of
contrasting health and pharmacy care infra-structure in
this context ?
Objective
• To describe the current practice and predictors of
self-medication in a selected urban and rural area
in Sri Lanka

Methods

• Study design
• A community based cross –sectional study
• Study Population
• Adults over 18 years of age, irrespective of sex ,
permanently residing in the selected districts over a
period of 1 year
Urban district
8 Urban Council areas

Rural district
Stratification

n= 900

n= 900
30 GN divisions
PSU

7 Regional Council (PS ) areas

PPS

30 GN divisions
PSU

30 Households per a
GN division

Voters list

30 Households per a
GN division

1 individual per house
(900)

Kish Table

1 individual per house
(900)
Study Instruments
• Interviewer administered questionnaire (IAQ)
• Validated Likert scale to assess the Perceived
satisfaction with available pharmacy services
– Access, Continuity, General Satisfaction of services
– Availability , Affordability, Efficacy of drugs
– Inter-personal explanation, Considerateness

• Validated Likert scale to assess the perceived
access to allopathic medical care
–
–
–
–

Availability of services,
Regularity and acceptability of services
Affordability of services
Concern for clients
SOCIO DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS
BELIEFS & ATTITUDES

ACCESS
FACTORS

Enabling factors
Predisposing factors

Medication use

Need variables

ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED MORBIDITY

Anderson and Newman’s health services
utilization model
Practice of medication use
urban (n=863)
Prevalence of medication use
(95% confidence interval )

33.9%
(30.7%-37.1 %)
Urban ( n =293 )

Rural (n=846)
35.3%
(32. 1-38.5)
Rural ( n=846)

Only allopathic medicine users

91.4%

84.6%

Only traditional medicine users

3.8%

12.4%

Both allopathic and traditional
medicine users

4.8%

3.0%

urban (n=863)

Rural (n=846)

Prevalence of self medication *

12.2%
(10% -14.4%)

7.9%
(6.1%-9.7%)

Self medication as a proportion
of medication use *

37.2%

25.6%

* P < 0.05
Practice of self-medication
Urban

Rural

Conditions of Acute onset and short duration

58%

67%

Perceived non-severity of the condition for
physician consultations

55%

64%

Previous satisfactory response of the same
drug to a similar condition

53%

60%

Self-medication without any symptom

09%

12%

Using previous prescriptions for self
medication for purchasing drugs

37%

-

-

45%

Self-medication with one drug

49%

73%

Self-medication with 2 drugs

28%

18%

Using labels/blister packs of previously used
drugs for purchasing drugs
Predictors of self medication
Urban
Predisposing variables
Household number ≤ 2
Non-affirmation of drugs
availability at informal places

Need Variables
Symptoms ≤ 2

Enabling Variables

Adjusted OR ( 95% CI)

Rural
Adjusted OR ( 95% CI)

4.3 ( 1.1-17.5)

-

0.3 (0.1-0.8)

-

Adjusted OR ( 95% CI)
7.9 (3.4-18.9)

Adjusted OR ( 95% CI)

Adjusted OR ( 95% CI)
2.4 (1.1-5.8)

Adjusted OR ( 95% CI)

Higher satisfaction with
acceptability of medical
services

0.96 (0.93-0.98)

-

Affordability of medical
services

-

0.4 (0.2-0.7)

Technical competence of
pharmacy staff

-

2.8 (1.1-7.3)
Conclusion & recommendations
• Self-medication is more prevalent in the urban setting
• Prevalence of SM is lower than global estimates
• Self-medication with 1-2 drugs selected on previous
experience is an initial individual response for diseases of
acute onset and perceived to be of less severity
• Lower symptom count is a need variable acting as a proxy
measure of perceived severity of the morbidity
• Self medication is dependent on characteristic access
measures unique in the two specific settings
• Findings should be utilized to
– Shape policy changes related to implementation of the CDD act
– Design IEC programs for consumers moving towards selfmedication
– Enhance the capacity of rural pharmacists/assistants as the first
contact points in the rural sector
Limitations
• Less valid data as compared to data collected in
a prospective follow up study using a diary
method
• Non-objective measurement of the severity of
the condition
• Social desirability bias due to use of public health
midwife for data collection
• Perceived access measures to health care and
pharmaceutical services reflect general rather
than specific context

Presentation icium turkey_2011

  • 1.
    Practice and Predictorsof selfmedication among urban and rural adults in Sri Lanka, three decades after Market Economic Reforms Dr. Pushpa Ranjan Wijesinghe MD- Rostov (General Medicine) MSc, MD-Colombo (Community Medicine) MPH-New Zealand ( Bio-security)
  • 2.
    Background • Practice ofself-medication in communities in varying • • • • degrees Increased private sector involvement in health & pharmaceutical care since 1977 Increased utilization of private health / pharmaceutical care for out patient conditions Competition of the pharmaceutical companies for a larger share of over the counter drug market What is the status of self-medication in settings of contrasting health and pharmacy care infra-structure in this context ?
  • 3.
    Objective • To describethe current practice and predictors of self-medication in a selected urban and rural area in Sri Lanka Methods • Study design • A community based cross –sectional study • Study Population • Adults over 18 years of age, irrespective of sex , permanently residing in the selected districts over a period of 1 year
  • 4.
    Urban district 8 UrbanCouncil areas Rural district Stratification n= 900 n= 900 30 GN divisions PSU 7 Regional Council (PS ) areas PPS 30 GN divisions PSU 30 Households per a GN division Voters list 30 Households per a GN division 1 individual per house (900) Kish Table 1 individual per house (900)
  • 5.
    Study Instruments • Intervieweradministered questionnaire (IAQ) • Validated Likert scale to assess the Perceived satisfaction with available pharmacy services – Access, Continuity, General Satisfaction of services – Availability , Affordability, Efficacy of drugs – Inter-personal explanation, Considerateness • Validated Likert scale to assess the perceived access to allopathic medical care – – – – Availability of services, Regularity and acceptability of services Affordability of services Concern for clients
  • 6.
    SOCIO DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS BELIEFS& ATTITUDES ACCESS FACTORS Enabling factors Predisposing factors Medication use Need variables ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED MORBIDITY Anderson and Newman’s health services utilization model
  • 7.
    Practice of medicationuse urban (n=863) Prevalence of medication use (95% confidence interval ) 33.9% (30.7%-37.1 %) Urban ( n =293 ) Rural (n=846) 35.3% (32. 1-38.5) Rural ( n=846) Only allopathic medicine users 91.4% 84.6% Only traditional medicine users 3.8% 12.4% Both allopathic and traditional medicine users 4.8% 3.0% urban (n=863) Rural (n=846) Prevalence of self medication * 12.2% (10% -14.4%) 7.9% (6.1%-9.7%) Self medication as a proportion of medication use * 37.2% 25.6% * P < 0.05
  • 8.
    Practice of self-medication Urban Rural Conditionsof Acute onset and short duration 58% 67% Perceived non-severity of the condition for physician consultations 55% 64% Previous satisfactory response of the same drug to a similar condition 53% 60% Self-medication without any symptom 09% 12% Using previous prescriptions for self medication for purchasing drugs 37% - - 45% Self-medication with one drug 49% 73% Self-medication with 2 drugs 28% 18% Using labels/blister packs of previously used drugs for purchasing drugs
  • 9.
    Predictors of selfmedication Urban Predisposing variables Household number ≤ 2 Non-affirmation of drugs availability at informal places Need Variables Symptoms ≤ 2 Enabling Variables Adjusted OR ( 95% CI) Rural Adjusted OR ( 95% CI) 4.3 ( 1.1-17.5) - 0.3 (0.1-0.8) - Adjusted OR ( 95% CI) 7.9 (3.4-18.9) Adjusted OR ( 95% CI) Adjusted OR ( 95% CI) 2.4 (1.1-5.8) Adjusted OR ( 95% CI) Higher satisfaction with acceptability of medical services 0.96 (0.93-0.98) - Affordability of medical services - 0.4 (0.2-0.7) Technical competence of pharmacy staff - 2.8 (1.1-7.3)
  • 10.
    Conclusion & recommendations •Self-medication is more prevalent in the urban setting • Prevalence of SM is lower than global estimates • Self-medication with 1-2 drugs selected on previous experience is an initial individual response for diseases of acute onset and perceived to be of less severity • Lower symptom count is a need variable acting as a proxy measure of perceived severity of the morbidity • Self medication is dependent on characteristic access measures unique in the two specific settings • Findings should be utilized to – Shape policy changes related to implementation of the CDD act – Design IEC programs for consumers moving towards selfmedication – Enhance the capacity of rural pharmacists/assistants as the first contact points in the rural sector
  • 11.
    Limitations • Less validdata as compared to data collected in a prospective follow up study using a diary method • Non-objective measurement of the severity of the condition • Social desirability bias due to use of public health midwife for data collection • Perceived access measures to health care and pharmaceutical services reflect general rather than specific context