Income Smoothing in
Shariah Compliant
Companies
An empirical
Study
Research ?
Are Managers involved
in Earnings
Management practice?
?
Introduction
•Opportunity of earnings
management is provided
to the firms by GAAP
allowing them the use
of accrual accounting.
• Theoretically present value of
future cash flows is considered
as value of the company. Thus
any increase in earnings depicts
the increase in overall value of
company and vice versa (Lev,
1989).
Review of Literature
Review of Literature
• According to an estimate 8-12 percent
firms with small pre-managed earning
decreases manipulate their earnings to
give impression of earning increases.
• 30-44 percent firms with small pre-
managed losses manipulate earnings to
show positive earnings (Burgstahler,
1997).
Review of Literature
(A study of Albanian
private sector firms 2013)
Reported that 36 out of 75
firms managed earnings
downward, which means
that 52 % firms tend to
enhance their profits to
avoid small losses.
O b j e c t i v e s
To find quality of earnings
in Shariah Compliant
companies of Pakistan.
To compare High cap
with low cap
companies.
Testable statement
2009 2010 2011 2012
Automobile
8 8 9 8
Textile
4 6 6 5
Energy(Pet, Gas, Batt)
13 15 15 14
(Che, Fert, Pha)
11 12 12 12
FMCG & Sugar Mills
4 5 5 5
Cement & Ceramics
13 13 13 13
Other(Tele, Engg, Logistics)
12 12 12 12
Total
65 71 72 69
CVΔIi / CVΔSi
Δ in salesΔ in EAT
Avg.Std. Std. Avg.
CV CV
Eckel
Index
< 1 > 1
Income
Smoothing
Income
Smoothing
METHODOLOGY-ECKEL’S INDEX
METHODOLOGY-MODIFIED JONES
T o t a l A c c r u a l s
E c k e l ’ s R e s u l t s
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Polled sample KMI30 Low cap
35 38 35
65 62 65
Non-Smoothers
Smoothers
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2009 2010 2011 2012
51
55
42
45
49
45
58
55
100 100 100 100
All Companies
Upward
Downward
Total
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2009 2010 2011 2012
63
50
33
25
38
50
67
75
Upward
Downward
Total
Honda Atlas Cars Downward
Indus Motors Company
Agri Autos Industries
Honda Atlas Cars Downward
Indus Motors Company
Atlas Honda
Ghandara Industries Ltd
Agri Autos Industries Upwar
Indus Motors Company
Hino Pak Motors
SazgarAutoEnggUpward
AgriAutosIndustries
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2009 2010 2011 2012
75 67
83
60
25 33
17
40
Downward
Upward
Kohenoor Industries
Downward
Kohenoor Industries
Downward
Dintextile Mills
Elite Spinnign Mills
Downward
DintextileDownward
Indus dyeing
2009 2010 2011 2012
69 60
27
50
31 40
73
50
Upward Downward
PSO Downward
Exide PAK
PAK Refinery
Attock Petroleum
Ghani Gasses Downward
Pak Refinery
National Refinery
Hub Power
Shell Pak
Burshane LPG Pak
Attock Petroleum Downward
National Refinery
OGDCL
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2009 2010 2011 2012
45
75
50 42
55
25
50 58
Upward Downward
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2009 2010 2011 2012
75
40 40 40
25
60 60 60
Downward
Upward
Unilever upward behavior in 2009
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2009 2010 2011 2012
31 31 31
54
69 69 69
46
Downward
Upward
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2009 2010 2011 2012
33
58 50 42
67
42 50 58
Downward
Upward
• Eckel, N. (1981). The Income Smoothing Hypothesis Revisited. Abacus, 11: 28-40.
Emre E., (2011). Income Smoothing: Evidence from Turkey
• Siti Masnah et al. (2013). Income Smoothing and Islam: Evidence from Malaysian
Shariah Compliant Companies. International Journal of Social Science and
Humanity, Vol. 3, No. 2, March 2013.
• Yusarina et al. (2013). Measuring market performance of shariah compliant
companies: the relevance of earnings management and leverage. 4th international
conference on business and economic research (4th October 2013) proceeding
• Alwan Sri Kustono, (2011). The theoretical construction of income smoothing
measurement. Journal of Economics, Business and Accountancy Ventura Volume
14, No. 1, April 2011, pages 59 – 78
Presentation final fyp

Presentation final fyp

  • 2.
    Income Smoothing in ShariahCompliant Companies An empirical Study
  • 3.
    Research ? Are Managersinvolved in Earnings Management practice? ?
  • 4.
    Introduction •Opportunity of earnings managementis provided to the firms by GAAP allowing them the use of accrual accounting.
  • 5.
    • Theoretically presentvalue of future cash flows is considered as value of the company. Thus any increase in earnings depicts the increase in overall value of company and vice versa (Lev, 1989). Review of Literature
  • 6.
    Review of Literature •According to an estimate 8-12 percent firms with small pre-managed earning decreases manipulate their earnings to give impression of earning increases. • 30-44 percent firms with small pre- managed losses manipulate earnings to show positive earnings (Burgstahler, 1997).
  • 7.
    Review of Literature (Astudy of Albanian private sector firms 2013) Reported that 36 out of 75 firms managed earnings downward, which means that 52 % firms tend to enhance their profits to avoid small losses.
  • 8.
    O b je c t i v e s To find quality of earnings in Shariah Compliant companies of Pakistan. To compare High cap with low cap companies.
  • 9.
  • 10.
    2009 2010 20112012 Automobile 8 8 9 8 Textile 4 6 6 5 Energy(Pet, Gas, Batt) 13 15 15 14 (Che, Fert, Pha) 11 12 12 12 FMCG & Sugar Mills 4 5 5 5 Cement & Ceramics 13 13 13 13 Other(Tele, Engg, Logistics) 12 12 12 12 Total 65 71 72 69
  • 11.
    CVΔIi / CVΔSi Δin salesΔ in EAT Avg.Std. Std. Avg. CV CV Eckel Index < 1 > 1 Income Smoothing Income Smoothing METHODOLOGY-ECKEL’S INDEX
  • 12.
  • 13.
    T o ta l A c c r u a l s
  • 14.
    E c ke l ’ s R e s u l t s 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Polled sample KMI30 Low cap 35 38 35 65 62 65 Non-Smoothers Smoothers
  • 15.
    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2009 2010 20112012 51 55 42 45 49 45 58 55 100 100 100 100 All Companies Upward Downward Total
  • 16.
    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2009 2010 20112012 63 50 33 25 38 50 67 75 Upward Downward Total Honda Atlas Cars Downward Indus Motors Company Agri Autos Industries Honda Atlas Cars Downward Indus Motors Company Atlas Honda Ghandara Industries Ltd Agri Autos Industries Upwar Indus Motors Company Hino Pak Motors SazgarAutoEnggUpward AgriAutosIndustries
  • 17.
    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2009 2010 20112012 75 67 83 60 25 33 17 40 Downward Upward Kohenoor Industries Downward Kohenoor Industries Downward Dintextile Mills Elite Spinnign Mills Downward DintextileDownward Indus dyeing
  • 18.
    2009 2010 20112012 69 60 27 50 31 40 73 50 Upward Downward PSO Downward Exide PAK PAK Refinery Attock Petroleum Ghani Gasses Downward Pak Refinery National Refinery Hub Power Shell Pak Burshane LPG Pak Attock Petroleum Downward National Refinery OGDCL
  • 19.
    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2009 2010 20112012 45 75 50 42 55 25 50 58 Upward Downward
  • 20.
    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2009 2010 20112012 75 40 40 40 25 60 60 60 Downward Upward Unilever upward behavior in 2009
  • 21.
    0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2009 2010 20112012 31 31 31 54 69 69 69 46 Downward Upward
  • 22.
    0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2009 2010 20112012 33 58 50 42 67 42 50 58 Downward Upward
  • 23.
    • Eckel, N.(1981). The Income Smoothing Hypothesis Revisited. Abacus, 11: 28-40. Emre E., (2011). Income Smoothing: Evidence from Turkey • Siti Masnah et al. (2013). Income Smoothing and Islam: Evidence from Malaysian Shariah Compliant Companies. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, Vol. 3, No. 2, March 2013. • Yusarina et al. (2013). Measuring market performance of shariah compliant companies: the relevance of earnings management and leverage. 4th international conference on business and economic research (4th October 2013) proceeding • Alwan Sri Kustono, (2011). The theoretical construction of income smoothing measurement. Journal of Economics, Business and Accountancy Ventura Volume 14, No. 1, April 2011, pages 59 – 78