Program Management Outsourcing:
Challenges & Factors contributing to success
Session # EM14CPX02
Moataz Y. Hussein, OPM3, PgMP, PMP, PMI-RMP
OPM Consulting (OPMC)
This research study has been conducted in collaboration with
Dr. Homayoun Khamooshi, an Assistant Professor in the
Department of Decision Sciences at the School of Business of
the George Washington University (GWU). He is the chair of
the Master of Science in Project Management program.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Overview
Key Factors in Program Management Outsourcing
Survey Demographics & Results
Outsourcing Challenges Syndromes
Recommendations & Proposed Governance Structure
Conclusion
AGENDA
It is assumed that the audience have already experience in Program Management, Outsourcing, Program Governance, Business Case,
delivery models and compensation models, etc. These definitions won’t be discussed in the presentation.
Client versus the PMC
perception on these
factors and the
perception on the value
of using a PMC
Views of practitioners and
academics on Program
Management Outsourcing.
 Proposed PMC-managed
program governance
structure.
Level of client’s
organizational maturity
key factors which impact the PMC-
managed programs and Investigate
to what extent they exist in practice.
 The most important links to build a
strong outsourcing capability chain.
3
4
7
5
6
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
Our objective is to
identify and investigate…
Manage
ment
Governance
team
PMC
Contract
ors
Consulta
nt
PAO PMO
Program Management
Outsourcing
Challenge
(Missing Enabler)
Success Factor or Capability
(Present Enabler)
Our objective is to identify and investigate
Overview
YOUR LOGO
YOUR LOGO
+60%
* The McKinsey Global Institute (MGI), 2013
1995 2012 2013 2030
Global Infrastructure Investment
$36 Trillion
$57 Trillion
The clients go for well-known PMC’s
Owner-managed, with PMC
providing staff support
integrated owner and PMC
team
PMC-managed
Program management at risk
Organizational Models used when hiring a PMC
YOUR LOGO
Why
PMC?
YOUR LOGO
Competent Staff Previous Similar Experience
Delivering Programs on timeWorld-class tools & processes
YOUR LOGO
% of mega infrastructure
projects suffer from some cost
overruns and more than this
percentage experience
schedule delays.
Booz & Company, 2010
90%The clients go for well-
known PMC’s to transfer
the risks resulting from
program complexity and
lack of skills and expertise.
90%
% of mega infrastructure
projects suffer from some
cost overruns and more
than this percentage
experience schedule
delays.
Booz & Company, 2010
90%
% of mega infrastructure
projects suffer from some
cost overruns and more
than this percentage
experience schedule
delays.
Booz & Company, 2010
How Did Things Go with
infrastructure programs?
YOUR LOGO
% of mega infrastructure
projects suffer from some cost
overruns and more than this
percentage experience
schedule delays.
Booz & Company, 2010
90%The clients go for well-
known PMC’s to transfer
the risks resulting from
program complexity and
lack of skills and expertise.
90%
% of mega infrastructure
projects suffer from some
cost overruns and more
than this percentage
experience schedule
delays.
Booz & Company, 2010
90%
% of mega infrastructure
projects suffer from some
cost overruns and more
than this percentage
experience schedule
delays.
Booz & Company, 2010
90%
% of infrastructure programs suffer from some cost
overruns and more than this percentage experience
schedule delays.
Booz & Company, 2010
YOUR LOGO
% of mega infrastructure
projects suffer from some cost
overruns and more than this
percentage experience
schedule delays.
Booz & Company, 2010
90%The clients go for well-
known PMC’s to transfer
the risks resulting from
program complexity and
lack of skills and expertise.
90%
% of mega infrastructure
projects suffer from some
cost overruns and more
than this percentage
experience schedule
delays.
Booz & Company, 2010
90%
% of mega infrastructure
projects suffer from some
cost overruns and more
than this percentage
experience schedule
delays.
Booz & Company, 2010
WHY?
% of infrastructure programs suffer from some cost
overruns and more than this percentage experience
schedule delays.
Booz & Company, 2010
KEY FACTORS IN PPROGRAM
MANAGEMENT OUTSOURCING
YOUR LOGO
Effective change management
Regular client consultation
Reliable estimates
Positive organizational culture
Clear prioritization of project goals by the client
Learning from previous experiences
Clearly written lines of responsibility
Client acceptance of plans
Feedback capabilities in the system
Awarding bids to the right designers/contractors
Mutual trust among project stakeholders
Creating accountabilities
Top management sponsorship
Building a balanced and winning team
Knowing what the client really wants
Competent project manager
WBS linked to OBS
Goals and priorities
Effective project planning and control
Proven methodology
Sufficient resources
Responsiveness of client
Strategic alignment
verify progress
Clear and detailed written contract
High quality workmanship
Critical Factors that impact large scale-projects
Effective project control mechanics
Good relationships with project stakeholders
Toor and Ogunlana, 2008
Stakeholder
Engagement
PMO & Program
Audit function
PMIS Roles, Responsibilities
& Delegation
Client’s Support
PMC compensation
Model & Risk Allocation
Program Governance
Program management
Practices & Processes
Client’s
Competent Staff
Transition
(Handover)
Client-PMC culture
Business Case
Factors Contributing to Program
Management Outsourcing Success
Stakeholder
Engagement
PMO & Program
Audit function
PMIS Roles, Responsibilities
& Delegation
Client’s Support
PMC compensation
Model & Risk Allocation
Program Governance
Program management
Practices & Processes
Client’s
Competent Staff
Transition
(Handover)
Client-PMC culture
Business Case
Program Management Outsourcing
Capability Chain
SURVEY DEMOGRAPHICS
YOUR LOGO
YOUR LOGO
16%
Survey Response Rate
1200
193
Survey Recipients Survey Respondents
Client
PMC
Breakdown of respondents by organizational type
76.8%
Breakdown of respondents by value of program
25.4%
40.8%
4.6%
SOUTH AMERICA
Breakdown of respondents by region
17.6%
NORTH AMERICA
8.5%
EUROPE
16.2%
ASIA
4.9%
AUSTRALIA
16.9%
AFRICA 31
%
MENA
33%
Roads &
Highways
32%
Large Scale
Buildings
25%
Power
33%
Water &
Drainage
31%
Oil & Gas
18%
Healthcare
16%
Ports
12%
Rail
31%
Telecommunication
18%
Others
X
Breakdown of respondents by Type of Program
SURVEY RESULTS
YOUR LOGO
Stakeholder
Engagement
PMO & Program
Audit functions
PMIS Roles, Responsibilities
& Delegation
Client’s Support
PMC compensation
Model & Risk Allocation
Program Governance
Program management
Practices & Processes
Client’s
Competent Staff
Transition
(Handover)
Client-PMC culture
Business Case
We wanted to rank the weak links
(factors) in the capability chain
① Client-PMC
Cultural Difference
② Absence of
PMO & Audit
③ Lack of Client’s
Competent Staff
④ Improper PMC
Compensation Model & Risk
allocation
⑧ Unclear Responsibilities
& Delegation
⑦ Lack of transition
& handover plan
⑥ Poor Stakeholder
Engagement
⑤ Absence of
Governance Model⑨ Lack of
Client Support
⑩ Lack of business
case
⑪ Improper PMIS
⑫ Improper Program
Management Methodology
82%
38%
64% 63% 60%
56%56%54%54%
52% 47% 41%
73%
65%
58% 53% 53%
86%
76%
69% 65% 61%
Client-PMC Cultural
Difference
Absence of PMO &
Audit
Lack of Client’s
Competent Staff
Improper
Compensation
Model & Risk
Allocation
Lack of Governance
Model
Client PMCClient PMC
Client versus PMC perspective on the top ranked missing factors
Client PMC
① The client / PMC cultural difference 
② Absence of PMO and Program Audit functions 
③ Lack of Client's Competent staff 
④ Improper PMC compensation model & risk allocation 
⑤ Absence of Governance structure 
⑥ Poor Program Stakeholder engagement 
⑦ Lack of a transition (Handover) plan 
⑧ Unclear Roles, Responsibilities and delegation 
⑨ Lack of Client Support 
⑩ Lack of Business Case 
⑪ Improper PMIS 
⑫
Improper Program Management Practices, Processes and
Methodologies

Responsibility for the key factors in the capability chain
Although the Stakeholder engagement is the responsibility of the PMC,
however, the client must play a key role in the stakeholder engagement
specially if he PMC is a foreign firm. It has been noticed in several infrastructure
programs that leaving the stakeholder engagement faction to a foreigner PMC
firm led to unfavorable results.
Although the PMC needs to setup a PMO & audit function, develop proper
governance structure, identify the roles & responsibilities within the program
organization; this does not substitute the client’s role to setup and develop these
functions within the parent organization in order to manage the relationship
between the parent and program organization (outsourcing relationship)
effectively.
Comment on the Responsibility for the key factors in the
capability chain*
* This comment has been added after the congress session as a clarification based on the discussion with some of the
attendees.
YOUR LOGO
% of the survey
respondents believe
that the PMC is an
added value to the
client’s organization
% of the client’s
organization
respondents have the
same belief
The Perception on the Value of PMC
80% 70%
Client
Performed: PM Processes
unpredictable, poorly
controlled and reactive
Managed: PM Processes
characterized for projects and
are often reactive
Defined: PM Processes
characterized for the organization
and are proactive
Quantitatively Managed: The
PM processes are measured
and controlled
Optimizing: PM processes are
continuously improved
Level 5
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
23%
47%
18%
5%
7%
Client Organizational Maturity
OUTSOURCING CHALLENGES SYNDROMES
YOUR LOGO
A syndrome, in medicine and psychology, is the collection of
signs and symptoms that are observed in a single condition
Murphy's Laws, in Management, when one thing goes
wrong, EVERYTHING starts to go wrong
① Client-PMC Cultural Difference
Top 5 challenges which face the outsourcing relationship
organizational
cultural
difference
resistance to
cooperate with
the PMC
socio- economic
difference
Competency
Difference
resistance to
change the old
work practices
Fear of losing
authority
Fear of losing
job
Resistance
Syndrome
② Absence of PMO and Audit function
Top 5 challenges which face the outsourcing relationship
No Standardized
Processes
old and new
work practices
go in parallel
Poor
coordination &
integration
No resources &
time optimization
More than one
version of the
story
Same mistakes..
Again & again
Inefficient
decision making
Continuous
NON
improvement
Syndrome
③ Lack of Client Competent Staff
Top 5 challenges which face the outsourcing relationship
Poor program
governance
resistance to
cooperate with
PMC
No common
language
between Client &
PMC
Blame Culture
resistance to
change the old
work practices
Fear of losing
authority
Fear of losing
job
Poor
Competency
Syndrome
④ Improper PMC compensation model & risk
allocation
Top 5 challenges which face the outsourcing relationship
High risk profile
Denial and
avoidance state
Conflict of
interest
Too many
changes and
claims
Blame Culture
Behind Schedule Over budget
Improper
Contract
Syndrome
⑤ Absence of Governance Structure
Top 5 challenges which face the outsourcing relationship
negligence to
client’s oversight
role
Over-Control
“Circle of non-
trust”
Over-reliance on
the PMC “Blind
trust”
Poor contract
administration
Blame Culture
Undefined
responsibilities
Improper
performance
management
Improper
Governance
Syndrome
YOUR LOGO
RECOMMENDATIONS
① Improving the organizational maturity and
developing the client’s staff competencies
Recommendations
Fight the resistance syndrome
before the commencement of the
program!
Assess staff
competencies
Continuous
Communication
with staff
Assessing OPM
maturity
OPM
improvement
initiatives.
Change
Management
Program
Recruiting the
right people to
fill competency
gaps.
Staff
competency
development
programs.
② Setting up a Program Management Office
(PMO) and a Program Audit Office (PAO)
Recommendations
Setting up a PMO & PAO and
positioning them in the top level
of the organization structure does
not guarantee their success!
Clear
Responsibilities
& level of
authority of the
PAO
PAO team ask
the right
questions
Clear
Responsibilities
& level of
authority of the
PMO
Staff them with
highly qualified
people
Guide the PMC
regarding
organizational &
environmental
factors
Have senior
management
support.
PMO and the
PAO are
independent
business units
③ Developing a good contract with a proper
PMC compensation model and risk allocation
Recommendations
The most critical part of the PMC
contract is the financial structure,
it’s the client’s responsibility to do
it right from the beginning!
Clear Contract
that leaves no
space for
imagination
Progress-based
payments, not
resource- based
The right
outsourcing
model
Scope, Scope
and Scope
A performance
based risk-
sharing contract
is better
The PMC is
NOT resources
provider
The PMC is a
delivery partner
④ Developing a proper governance model with
clear roles, responsibilities, and delegation
Recommendations
Clients can definitely outsource
program management, but they
cannot outsource Program
Governance!
Clear Client-
PMC
accountability
Clarify the role of
the PMO and the
PAO in the
program
organization.
First thing in the
program
Common
agreement on
the success
criteria
Agreed upon
technical &
financial
delegated
authority
Agreed upon
program change
management
process
Common
agreement on
Performance
management
YOUR LOGO
PROPOSED GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
Proposed
Governance
Structure
0
1
2
3
4
5
LevelofrequiredPMC
Oversight
Level of Client-PMC Trust
0
1
2
3
4
5
Efforttoperform
oversight
Level of Client’s OPM Maturity
0
1
2
3
4
5
Levelofwell-
documentedgovernance
model
Level of Client’s OPM Maturity
0
1
2
3
4
5
Levelofwell-
documentedgovernance
model
Level of Client-PMC Trust
Factors which impact setting the levels of change and
the level of oversight
YOUR LOGO
CONCLUSION
② Absence of
PMO & Audit
③ Lack of Client’s
Competent Staff
① Client-PMC
Cultural Difference
④ Improper PMC Compensation
Model & Risk allocation
⑤ Absence of Governance
Model
2+2=3
2+2=4
2+2=5
Top 5 challenges (weakest links) in the Outsourcing capability chain
② Setting up a PMO
and a real PAO
③ Developing a good contract
with a proper PMC compensation
model and risk allocation
① Improving the organizational
maturity and developing the
client’s staff competencies
Project Management
Program Management
Portfolio Management
Strategy
Top 4 enablers (links) for strong Outsourcing capability chain
④ developing a proper governance
model with clear roles,
responsibilities, and delegation
53%
Of the Clients’
respondents
Believe that their organizations lack
competent staff and proper
governance structure.
53.3%
Of the Clients’
respondents
82%
Of the
respondents
Believe that the Client-PMC
cultural difference is the biggest
challenge.
65%
Of the Clients’
respondents
believe that their organizations don’t
have a proper PMO and program
audit
75%
&
100%
75% of the identified challenges are
the responsibility of the client, and the
top 5 challenges are also the
responsibility of the client.
70%
Of the Clients’
respondents
Believe that PMC is an
added value to their
organization
70%
Of the
respondents
Rated the client’s
organization maturity as
either level 1 or level 2
performance
based risk-
sharing
contract
A performance based risk-sharing
contracting strategy would be a better
approach compared to the currently
used contract types
Client-PMC
agreement
Client & PMC agree on the top 5
challenges that face program
management outsourcing.
One more thing…
This study is neither promoting the
PMC over controlling behavior nor
giving them a free rein
It is an invitation to the Client and the
PMC to find the right balance of
responsibility and build a mutual trust
Moataz Yousif Hussein
Consultant, Project & Strategy Management
OPM Consulting (OPMC)
113 Barksdale Professional Center
Newark, DE 19711
USA
USA: +1 916-273-3331
Qatar: +974 66490135
moataz@gwu.edu
moataz@opmc.com
http://qa.linkedin.com/in/moatazyousif/

Program Management Outsourcing: Challenges & Factors Contributing to Success

  • 1.
    Program Management Outsourcing: Challenges& Factors contributing to success Session # EM14CPX02 Moataz Y. Hussein, OPM3, PgMP, PMP, PMI-RMP OPM Consulting (OPMC)
  • 2.
    This research studyhas been conducted in collaboration with Dr. Homayoun Khamooshi, an Assistant Professor in the Department of Decision Sciences at the School of Business of the George Washington University (GWU). He is the chair of the Master of Science in Project Management program. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
  • 3.
    Overview Key Factors inProgram Management Outsourcing Survey Demographics & Results Outsourcing Challenges Syndromes Recommendations & Proposed Governance Structure Conclusion AGENDA It is assumed that the audience have already experience in Program Management, Outsourcing, Program Governance, Business Case, delivery models and compensation models, etc. These definitions won’t be discussed in the presentation.
  • 4.
    Client versus thePMC perception on these factors and the perception on the value of using a PMC Views of practitioners and academics on Program Management Outsourcing.  Proposed PMC-managed program governance structure. Level of client’s organizational maturity key factors which impact the PMC- managed programs and Investigate to what extent they exist in practice.  The most important links to build a strong outsourcing capability chain. 3 4 7 5 6 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Our objective is to identify and investigate… Manage ment Governance team PMC Contract ors Consulta nt PAO PMO
  • 5.
    Program Management Outsourcing Challenge (Missing Enabler) SuccessFactor or Capability (Present Enabler) Our objective is to identify and investigate
  • 6.
  • 7.
    YOUR LOGO +60% * TheMcKinsey Global Institute (MGI), 2013 1995 2012 2013 2030 Global Infrastructure Investment $36 Trillion $57 Trillion
  • 8.
    The clients gofor well-known PMC’s
  • 9.
    Owner-managed, with PMC providingstaff support integrated owner and PMC team PMC-managed Program management at risk Organizational Models used when hiring a PMC
  • 10.
  • 11.
    YOUR LOGO Competent StaffPrevious Similar Experience Delivering Programs on timeWorld-class tools & processes
  • 12.
    YOUR LOGO % ofmega infrastructure projects suffer from some cost overruns and more than this percentage experience schedule delays. Booz & Company, 2010 90%The clients go for well- known PMC’s to transfer the risks resulting from program complexity and lack of skills and expertise. 90% % of mega infrastructure projects suffer from some cost overruns and more than this percentage experience schedule delays. Booz & Company, 2010 90% % of mega infrastructure projects suffer from some cost overruns and more than this percentage experience schedule delays. Booz & Company, 2010 How Did Things Go with infrastructure programs?
  • 13.
    YOUR LOGO % ofmega infrastructure projects suffer from some cost overruns and more than this percentage experience schedule delays. Booz & Company, 2010 90%The clients go for well- known PMC’s to transfer the risks resulting from program complexity and lack of skills and expertise. 90% % of mega infrastructure projects suffer from some cost overruns and more than this percentage experience schedule delays. Booz & Company, 2010 90% % of mega infrastructure projects suffer from some cost overruns and more than this percentage experience schedule delays. Booz & Company, 2010 90% % of infrastructure programs suffer from some cost overruns and more than this percentage experience schedule delays. Booz & Company, 2010
  • 14.
    YOUR LOGO % ofmega infrastructure projects suffer from some cost overruns and more than this percentage experience schedule delays. Booz & Company, 2010 90%The clients go for well- known PMC’s to transfer the risks resulting from program complexity and lack of skills and expertise. 90% % of mega infrastructure projects suffer from some cost overruns and more than this percentage experience schedule delays. Booz & Company, 2010 90% % of mega infrastructure projects suffer from some cost overruns and more than this percentage experience schedule delays. Booz & Company, 2010 WHY? % of infrastructure programs suffer from some cost overruns and more than this percentage experience schedule delays. Booz & Company, 2010
  • 15.
    KEY FACTORS INPPROGRAM MANAGEMENT OUTSOURCING YOUR LOGO
  • 16.
    Effective change management Regularclient consultation Reliable estimates Positive organizational culture Clear prioritization of project goals by the client Learning from previous experiences Clearly written lines of responsibility Client acceptance of plans Feedback capabilities in the system Awarding bids to the right designers/contractors Mutual trust among project stakeholders Creating accountabilities Top management sponsorship Building a balanced and winning team Knowing what the client really wants Competent project manager WBS linked to OBS Goals and priorities Effective project planning and control Proven methodology Sufficient resources Responsiveness of client Strategic alignment verify progress Clear and detailed written contract High quality workmanship Critical Factors that impact large scale-projects Effective project control mechanics Good relationships with project stakeholders Toor and Ogunlana, 2008
  • 17.
    Stakeholder Engagement PMO & Program Auditfunction PMIS Roles, Responsibilities & Delegation Client’s Support PMC compensation Model & Risk Allocation Program Governance Program management Practices & Processes Client’s Competent Staff Transition (Handover) Client-PMC culture Business Case Factors Contributing to Program Management Outsourcing Success
  • 18.
    Stakeholder Engagement PMO & Program Auditfunction PMIS Roles, Responsibilities & Delegation Client’s Support PMC compensation Model & Risk Allocation Program Governance Program management Practices & Processes Client’s Competent Staff Transition (Handover) Client-PMC culture Business Case Program Management Outsourcing Capability Chain
  • 19.
  • 20.
    YOUR LOGO 16% Survey ResponseRate 1200 193 Survey Recipients Survey Respondents
  • 21.
    Client PMC Breakdown of respondentsby organizational type 76.8%
  • 22.
    Breakdown of respondentsby value of program 25.4% 40.8%
  • 23.
    4.6% SOUTH AMERICA Breakdown ofrespondents by region 17.6% NORTH AMERICA 8.5% EUROPE 16.2% ASIA 4.9% AUSTRALIA 16.9% AFRICA 31 % MENA
  • 24.
    33% Roads & Highways 32% Large Scale Buildings 25% Power 33% Water& Drainage 31% Oil & Gas 18% Healthcare 16% Ports 12% Rail 31% Telecommunication 18% Others X Breakdown of respondents by Type of Program
  • 25.
  • 26.
    Stakeholder Engagement PMO & Program Auditfunctions PMIS Roles, Responsibilities & Delegation Client’s Support PMC compensation Model & Risk Allocation Program Governance Program management Practices & Processes Client’s Competent Staff Transition (Handover) Client-PMC culture Business Case We wanted to rank the weak links (factors) in the capability chain
  • 27.
    ① Client-PMC Cultural Difference ②Absence of PMO & Audit ③ Lack of Client’s Competent Staff ④ Improper PMC Compensation Model & Risk allocation ⑧ Unclear Responsibilities & Delegation ⑦ Lack of transition & handover plan ⑥ Poor Stakeholder Engagement ⑤ Absence of Governance Model⑨ Lack of Client Support ⑩ Lack of business case ⑪ Improper PMIS ⑫ Improper Program Management Methodology 82% 38% 64% 63% 60% 56%56%54%54% 52% 47% 41%
  • 28.
    73% 65% 58% 53% 53% 86% 76% 69%65% 61% Client-PMC Cultural Difference Absence of PMO & Audit Lack of Client’s Competent Staff Improper Compensation Model & Risk Allocation Lack of Governance Model Client PMCClient PMC Client versus PMC perspective on the top ranked missing factors
  • 29.
    Client PMC ① Theclient / PMC cultural difference  ② Absence of PMO and Program Audit functions  ③ Lack of Client's Competent staff  ④ Improper PMC compensation model & risk allocation  ⑤ Absence of Governance structure  ⑥ Poor Program Stakeholder engagement  ⑦ Lack of a transition (Handover) plan  ⑧ Unclear Roles, Responsibilities and delegation  ⑨ Lack of Client Support  ⑩ Lack of Business Case  ⑪ Improper PMIS  ⑫ Improper Program Management Practices, Processes and Methodologies  Responsibility for the key factors in the capability chain
  • 30.
    Although the Stakeholderengagement is the responsibility of the PMC, however, the client must play a key role in the stakeholder engagement specially if he PMC is a foreign firm. It has been noticed in several infrastructure programs that leaving the stakeholder engagement faction to a foreigner PMC firm led to unfavorable results. Although the PMC needs to setup a PMO & audit function, develop proper governance structure, identify the roles & responsibilities within the program organization; this does not substitute the client’s role to setup and develop these functions within the parent organization in order to manage the relationship between the parent and program organization (outsourcing relationship) effectively. Comment on the Responsibility for the key factors in the capability chain* * This comment has been added after the congress session as a clarification based on the discussion with some of the attendees.
  • 31.
    YOUR LOGO % ofthe survey respondents believe that the PMC is an added value to the client’s organization % of the client’s organization respondents have the same belief The Perception on the Value of PMC 80% 70% Client
  • 32.
    Performed: PM Processes unpredictable,poorly controlled and reactive Managed: PM Processes characterized for projects and are often reactive Defined: PM Processes characterized for the organization and are proactive Quantitatively Managed: The PM processes are measured and controlled Optimizing: PM processes are continuously improved Level 5 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 23% 47% 18% 5% 7% Client Organizational Maturity
  • 33.
  • 34.
    A syndrome, inmedicine and psychology, is the collection of signs and symptoms that are observed in a single condition Murphy's Laws, in Management, when one thing goes wrong, EVERYTHING starts to go wrong
  • 35.
    ① Client-PMC CulturalDifference Top 5 challenges which face the outsourcing relationship organizational cultural difference resistance to cooperate with the PMC socio- economic difference Competency Difference resistance to change the old work practices Fear of losing authority Fear of losing job Resistance Syndrome
  • 36.
    ② Absence ofPMO and Audit function Top 5 challenges which face the outsourcing relationship No Standardized Processes old and new work practices go in parallel Poor coordination & integration No resources & time optimization More than one version of the story Same mistakes.. Again & again Inefficient decision making Continuous NON improvement Syndrome
  • 37.
    ③ Lack ofClient Competent Staff Top 5 challenges which face the outsourcing relationship Poor program governance resistance to cooperate with PMC No common language between Client & PMC Blame Culture resistance to change the old work practices Fear of losing authority Fear of losing job Poor Competency Syndrome
  • 38.
    ④ Improper PMCcompensation model & risk allocation Top 5 challenges which face the outsourcing relationship High risk profile Denial and avoidance state Conflict of interest Too many changes and claims Blame Culture Behind Schedule Over budget Improper Contract Syndrome
  • 39.
    ⑤ Absence ofGovernance Structure Top 5 challenges which face the outsourcing relationship negligence to client’s oversight role Over-Control “Circle of non- trust” Over-reliance on the PMC “Blind trust” Poor contract administration Blame Culture Undefined responsibilities Improper performance management Improper Governance Syndrome
  • 40.
  • 41.
    ① Improving theorganizational maturity and developing the client’s staff competencies Recommendations Fight the resistance syndrome before the commencement of the program! Assess staff competencies Continuous Communication with staff Assessing OPM maturity OPM improvement initiatives. Change Management Program Recruiting the right people to fill competency gaps. Staff competency development programs.
  • 42.
    ② Setting upa Program Management Office (PMO) and a Program Audit Office (PAO) Recommendations Setting up a PMO & PAO and positioning them in the top level of the organization structure does not guarantee their success! Clear Responsibilities & level of authority of the PAO PAO team ask the right questions Clear Responsibilities & level of authority of the PMO Staff them with highly qualified people Guide the PMC regarding organizational & environmental factors Have senior management support. PMO and the PAO are independent business units
  • 43.
    ③ Developing agood contract with a proper PMC compensation model and risk allocation Recommendations The most critical part of the PMC contract is the financial structure, it’s the client’s responsibility to do it right from the beginning! Clear Contract that leaves no space for imagination Progress-based payments, not resource- based The right outsourcing model Scope, Scope and Scope A performance based risk- sharing contract is better The PMC is NOT resources provider The PMC is a delivery partner
  • 44.
    ④ Developing aproper governance model with clear roles, responsibilities, and delegation Recommendations Clients can definitely outsource program management, but they cannot outsource Program Governance! Clear Client- PMC accountability Clarify the role of the PMO and the PAO in the program organization. First thing in the program Common agreement on the success criteria Agreed upon technical & financial delegated authority Agreed upon program change management process Common agreement on Performance management
  • 45.
  • 46.
  • 47.
    0 1 2 3 4 5 LevelofrequiredPMC Oversight Level of Client-PMCTrust 0 1 2 3 4 5 Efforttoperform oversight Level of Client’s OPM Maturity 0 1 2 3 4 5 Levelofwell- documentedgovernance model Level of Client’s OPM Maturity 0 1 2 3 4 5 Levelofwell- documentedgovernance model Level of Client-PMC Trust Factors which impact setting the levels of change and the level of oversight
  • 48.
  • 49.
    ② Absence of PMO& Audit ③ Lack of Client’s Competent Staff ① Client-PMC Cultural Difference ④ Improper PMC Compensation Model & Risk allocation ⑤ Absence of Governance Model 2+2=3 2+2=4 2+2=5 Top 5 challenges (weakest links) in the Outsourcing capability chain
  • 50.
    ② Setting upa PMO and a real PAO ③ Developing a good contract with a proper PMC compensation model and risk allocation ① Improving the organizational maturity and developing the client’s staff competencies Project Management Program Management Portfolio Management Strategy Top 4 enablers (links) for strong Outsourcing capability chain ④ developing a proper governance model with clear roles, responsibilities, and delegation
  • 51.
    53% Of the Clients’ respondents Believethat their organizations lack competent staff and proper governance structure. 53.3% Of the Clients’ respondents 82% Of the respondents Believe that the Client-PMC cultural difference is the biggest challenge. 65% Of the Clients’ respondents believe that their organizations don’t have a proper PMO and program audit 75% & 100% 75% of the identified challenges are the responsibility of the client, and the top 5 challenges are also the responsibility of the client. 70% Of the Clients’ respondents Believe that PMC is an added value to their organization 70% Of the respondents Rated the client’s organization maturity as either level 1 or level 2 performance based risk- sharing contract A performance based risk-sharing contracting strategy would be a better approach compared to the currently used contract types Client-PMC agreement Client & PMC agree on the top 5 challenges that face program management outsourcing.
  • 52.
    One more thing… Thisstudy is neither promoting the PMC over controlling behavior nor giving them a free rein It is an invitation to the Client and the PMC to find the right balance of responsibility and build a mutual trust
  • 54.
    Moataz Yousif Hussein Consultant,Project & Strategy Management OPM Consulting (OPMC) 113 Barksdale Professional Center Newark, DE 19711 USA USA: +1 916-273-3331 Qatar: +974 66490135 moataz@gwu.edu moataz@opmc.com http://qa.linkedin.com/in/moatazyousif/