An introduction to CIFOR's global comparative study on REDD+ (GCS-REDD+)CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Maria Brockhaus at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable carbon and non-carbon results' from 21-23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
Assessing REDD+ Benefit Sharing for Efficiency, Effectiveness and EquityCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Grace Wong, Cecilia Luttrell, Lasse Loft, Anastasia Yang, Maria Brockhaus, Shintia Arwida, Januarti Tjajadi, Pham Thu Thuy and Samuel Assembe-Mvondo at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable carbon and non-carbon results' from 21-23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
Exploring Participatory Prospective Analysis: A collaborative, scenario-based...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Nining Liswanti, Esther Mwangi, Tuti Herawati and Mani Ram Banjade on 21 March 2017 at the World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty in Washington, DC.
Looking REDD at landscape level: learning from CBNRM in NepalCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation by Naya Sharma Paudel and Dil Bahadur Khatri Experiences of CF talks about watershed and landscape level forest management initiatives, REDD/PES piloting at different scale and lessons & insights on institutional aspects.
Which policy, institutional and governance aspects are fostering or else hamp...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Daniela Schweizer (University of Sao Paulo and CIFOR) at the World Conference on Ecological Restoration (SER 2017) in Foz do Iguassu, Paraná (Brazil), on August 29, 2017.
Session: The role of public policies in influencing forest restoration in Latin America.
An introduction to CIFOR's global comparative study on REDD+ (GCS-REDD+)CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Maria Brockhaus at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable carbon and non-carbon results' from 21-23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
Assessing REDD+ Benefit Sharing for Efficiency, Effectiveness and EquityCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Grace Wong, Cecilia Luttrell, Lasse Loft, Anastasia Yang, Maria Brockhaus, Shintia Arwida, Januarti Tjajadi, Pham Thu Thuy and Samuel Assembe-Mvondo at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable carbon and non-carbon results' from 21-23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
Exploring Participatory Prospective Analysis: A collaborative, scenario-based...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Nining Liswanti, Esther Mwangi, Tuti Herawati and Mani Ram Banjade on 21 March 2017 at the World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty in Washington, DC.
Looking REDD at landscape level: learning from CBNRM in NepalCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation by Naya Sharma Paudel and Dil Bahadur Khatri Experiences of CF talks about watershed and landscape level forest management initiatives, REDD/PES piloting at different scale and lessons & insights on institutional aspects.
Which policy, institutional and governance aspects are fostering or else hamp...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Daniela Schweizer (University of Sao Paulo and CIFOR) at the World Conference on Ecological Restoration (SER 2017) in Foz do Iguassu, Paraná (Brazil), on August 29, 2017.
Session: The role of public policies in influencing forest restoration in Latin America.
Enhancing transparency in the land sector under the Paris Agreement: Bringing...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Steven Lawry, Research Director for Governance, at the National Workshop on Translating Transparency Framework under the Paris Agreement into National Context, 26 January 2017, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Benefit sharing from a multilevel governance perspectiveCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was delivered by Anne M Larson, January 2016, in Brussels.
It examines the opportunity, transaction and implementation costs of REDD+ at national and subnational levels, multilevel governance and rights, and assesses perspectives of equity at different levels.
Presented by Veronique (Niki) De Sy at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable carbon and non-carbon results' from 21-23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
Walking the REDD+ line: Insights from CIFOR's REDD+ Global Comparative StudyCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Arild Angelsen, from the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), during CIFOR's side event 'REDD+: Where does it stand and what is needed now?' at UNFCCC's COP23 in Bonn, Germany, on November 9, 2017.
Community forestry. Where and why has devolution of forest rights contributed...IFPRI-PIM
Presentation for the webinar organized by the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (www.pim.cgiar.org) on August 29, 2017. Steven Lawry, Director of Equity, Gender and Tenure research program at Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) summarized findings of selected meta-analyses, presented case studies from Nepal, Guatemala, and Mexico, and previewed emerging research looking at the investment effects of community forestry models that feature strong elements of forest rights devolution.
Greater than the sum of its parts? Lessons from a collaborative, multi-actor,...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Nining Liswanti, from the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), at the XVI Biennial IASC Conference ‘Practicing the commons: self-governance, cooperation, and institutional change’, in Utrecht, the Netherlands, on July 14, 2017.
CIFOR’s contribution to ASFCC: evidence, capacity building and engagementCIFOR-ICRAF
Presents findings from three studies in Indonesia on social forestry, in Laos on REDD+, and in Vietnam on swidden agriculture.
The presentation was given at the ASFN Annual meeting in Palawan in June 2016.
Social Forestry & the Paris agreement: Lessons for benefit sharingCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given at the session at COP22 titled, "Social forestry sustains local actions to advance the Paris Agreement" organized by CIFOR and the Indonesian Ministry of Environment and Forestry.
http://www.cifor.org/cifor-at-cop22/sessions/09-nov/social-forestry-sustains-local-actions-advance-paris-agreement/
Equity risks in a REDD+ results-based frameworkCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given during the session at COP22 titled "Measuring and monitoring performance, and managing risks in REDD+" organized by CIFOR in partnership with EU, NORAD, DFID UKAid, and SDC.
http://www.cifor.org/cifor-at-cop22/sessions/09-nov/measuring-monitoring-performance-managing-risks-redd/
Enhancing transparency in the land sector under the Paris Agreement: Bringing...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Steven Lawry, Research Director for Governance, at the National Workshop on Translating Transparency Framework under the Paris Agreement into National Context, 26 January 2017, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Benefit sharing from a multilevel governance perspectiveCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was delivered by Anne M Larson, January 2016, in Brussels.
It examines the opportunity, transaction and implementation costs of REDD+ at national and subnational levels, multilevel governance and rights, and assesses perspectives of equity at different levels.
Presented by Veronique (Niki) De Sy at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable carbon and non-carbon results' from 21-23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
Walking the REDD+ line: Insights from CIFOR's REDD+ Global Comparative StudyCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Arild Angelsen, from the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), during CIFOR's side event 'REDD+: Where does it stand and what is needed now?' at UNFCCC's COP23 in Bonn, Germany, on November 9, 2017.
Community forestry. Where and why has devolution of forest rights contributed...IFPRI-PIM
Presentation for the webinar organized by the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (www.pim.cgiar.org) on August 29, 2017. Steven Lawry, Director of Equity, Gender and Tenure research program at Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) summarized findings of selected meta-analyses, presented case studies from Nepal, Guatemala, and Mexico, and previewed emerging research looking at the investment effects of community forestry models that feature strong elements of forest rights devolution.
Greater than the sum of its parts? Lessons from a collaborative, multi-actor,...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Nining Liswanti, from the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), at the XVI Biennial IASC Conference ‘Practicing the commons: self-governance, cooperation, and institutional change’, in Utrecht, the Netherlands, on July 14, 2017.
CIFOR’s contribution to ASFCC: evidence, capacity building and engagementCIFOR-ICRAF
Presents findings from three studies in Indonesia on social forestry, in Laos on REDD+, and in Vietnam on swidden agriculture.
The presentation was given at the ASFN Annual meeting in Palawan in June 2016.
Social Forestry & the Paris agreement: Lessons for benefit sharingCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given at the session at COP22 titled, "Social forestry sustains local actions to advance the Paris Agreement" organized by CIFOR and the Indonesian Ministry of Environment and Forestry.
http://www.cifor.org/cifor-at-cop22/sessions/09-nov/social-forestry-sustains-local-actions-advance-paris-agreement/
Equity risks in a REDD+ results-based frameworkCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given during the session at COP22 titled "Measuring and monitoring performance, and managing risks in REDD+" organized by CIFOR in partnership with EU, NORAD, DFID UKAid, and SDC.
http://www.cifor.org/cifor-at-cop22/sessions/09-nov/measuring-monitoring-performance-managing-risks-redd/
A payments for environmental services scheme at Sasumua watershed could help farmers to implement sustainable land management practices in the area, which in turn, will ensure the reliable flow of clean water into the Sasumua Dam reservoir.
Financing FLR: Governance and funding opportunities for landscape management ...Etifor srl
Presentation by Etifor at the workshop Maich Chania organised in the context of the Mediterre3 project. The project is supported by the European Climate Initiative (EUKI)
From 27-29 October 2014, WLE, in cooperation with the CGIAR Systemwide Program on Collective Action and Property Rights (CAPRI) and the CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees, and Agroforestry (FTA), held a workshop on Institutions for Ecosystems Services in Washington DC.
The goals of the workshop were to:
-Encourage sharing and discussion on research methods and tools to study the links between institutions and ecosystem services
-Synthesize lessons about institutional arrangements needed to ensure that ecosystem services projects are able to deliver benefits to local resource users and produce local, regional, and national global environmental benefits
-Identify policies and program interventions that can strengthen these institutions
-Outline priorities for future research, policy, and project implementation, particularly of relevance for PIM, WLE, and FTA programs
This presentation is a compilation of four that were given on 30 November 2011 at an official UNFCCC COP17 side-event organised by CIFOR: 'How is REDD+ unfolding on the ground?'. The event discussed early insights on the capability of REDD+ projects to deliver on their goal of sequestering forest carbon while providing a range of co-benefits. The information presented draws mainly on findings of CIFOR's Global Comparative Study on REDD+, and covers the status and challenges of REDD+ projects on the ground;
challenges encountered in establishing REDD+ in Africa;
the policy and economic context in which REDD+ projects is unfolding; and
the status of monitoring, reporting and verification in setting up REDD+.
Greening Commodity Agriculture: Agri-environmental policy in East and Southea...EcoAgriculture Partners
On September 15th, 2015, EcoAgriculture Partners, The World Bank, and Clarmondial launched their newest research, published in the book Steps Toward Green. This PowerPoint overviews learnings and conclusions drawn from analysis of six commodity landscapes in East and Southeast Asia, and recommendations for national policy action around integrated landscape management to green agricultural sectors.
ICRAF (World Agroforestry Centre) presentation to International Fund for Agricultural Development, end-May, 2011 on Rewards for Environmental Services / Payments for Environmenal Services
Similar to Presa Startup Overview For Outcome Mapping March 1 2010 (20)
Presentation by the Jane Goodall Institute. The goal of this project is to reduce deforestation and forest degradation within the Budongo-Bugoma corridor (BBC) by at least half by building awareness, capacity and governance mechanisms for private forest owners and community groups to access carbon payments and benefit from REDD based global approaches to climate change mitigation.
Presentation by Tuyeni Mwampamba. The presentation discusses data collection, analysis and reporting in Social and Biodiversity Impact Assessment (SBIA) for REDD projects.
Presentation by Michael Richards. The presentation shows the necessary steps in conducting a social and biodiversity impact assessment (SBIA) for REDD projects.
More from Pro-poor Rewards for Environmental Services in Africa ICRAF (20)
Social and Biodiversity Impact Assessment - the 7 stages
Presa Startup Overview For Outcome Mapping March 1 2010
1. PRESA– Pro-Poor Rewards for Environmental Services in Africa Thomas Yatich and Miika Makela, PRESA Overview for outcome mapping March 1, 2010, Brackenhurst, Limuru-Kenya
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. RUPES / PRESA time line 1998 2002 2009 2011 2007 2008 2006 2010 First discussions with IFAD RUPES 1 began RUPES 1 implemented RUPES 1 Reporting; Development of RUPES II RUPES II implemented PRESA developed PRESA implemented Pan-tropical Scoping study Scoping Study papers published
7. Incentives, compensation and reward typologies for sustaining ecosystem services (source: Pan-tropical scoping study)
8. Supported by IFAD Coordinated by the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Implemented with local, national and international partners RUPES aims to enhance the livelihoods and reduce the poverty of upland poor in Asia while supporting environmental conservation at the global and local levels
11. Kulekhani, Nepal Kalahan Manila Kalahan Sumberjaya Lampung Bungo Jambi Singkarak West Sumatra Bakhun Bakun
12.
13.
14. PRESA Goal and Objectives G oal: smallholder farmers and residents living in the highlands of East and West Africa benefit from fair and effective agreements between stewards and beneficiaries of ecosystem services. Objectives: 1. Foster workable environmental service agreements. 2. Catalyze policy support and private-sector participation in environmental service agreements 3. Build a community of practice to provide support to researchers, NGOs and government agencies interested in pro-poor rewards for environmental services in Africa
21. Pentagon of Defining Research Questions Questions / Hypotheses Realistic Efficiency Acceptability Sustainability Poverty
22. Realistic / effective Q1. What are the critical spaces in watersheds and mixed-use landscapes where on-farm land use has greatest off-farm effects (eg riverine areas)? Q2. What are likely time paths of landscape degradation and restoration (lags, hysteresis effects)? Q3. What elements of agroforestry and other land use systems are most important for landscape function (eg anchoring and binding for landslide risk)? Ulugurus, Tanzania Sasumua, central Kenya Western Usambaras, Tanzania
23. Efficiency Q1. Are there strong negative incentives for farmers to practice good environmental stewardship or the private sector to invest in ecosystem services (eg rural taxation, monopoly on power supply)? Q2. What are the strongest elements of the business case for investment in ecosystem management (compliance, reputation, market niche, cost)? Q3. What is the possibility of using reverse auction approaches for countering problems of asymmetric information?
24. Acceptability / Fairness Q1. How does the form of conditional payment affect their acceptance in local communities (eg. property rights, monetary payments, public services) Q2. What are the tradeoffs between fairness and efficiency in geographic and social targeting of positive incentives / payments (eg case of REDD in Indonesia)? Q3. Do mechanisms with positive incentives undermine social norms of responsible behavior?
25.
26.
27.
28.
Editor's Notes
Let me bring your attention to a wider picture as the background of this initiative. This initiative is part of ICRAF SEA coordinated program called RUPES Program in addressing the possibilities to adapt pro-poor payment for env ser mechanisms in Asian context.
The RUPES project is working with international, national and local partners in six action research sites, 3 in Indonesia, 2 in the Philippines and 1 in Nepal and we also have a range of learning sites across Asia as means to exchange information and lessons learned with other institutions that have interests in PES issues.