Bruce Edmonds gave a talk on policy making using modeling in complex systems. He argued that traditional approaches to modeling and policy making do not work for complex systems, which require different modeling techniques and relationships between modelers and policy actors. Specifically, he noted that complex systems cannot be accurately forecast, may not reach equilibriums, and require iterative modeling to understand possible outcomes rather than predict impacts. He suggested moving from probabilistic forecasting to risk analysis of different possibilities to better inform adaptive policy making.
Towards Institutional System Farming
A talk at the Lorentz Workshop on "Emerging Institutions: Design or Evolution?" September 2016, Leiden, NL (https://www.lorentzcenter.nl/lc/web/2016/836/info.php3?wsid=836&venue=Oort)
A Model of Social and Cognitive CoherenceBruce Edmonds
An inbvited talk at the Workshop on Coherence -Based Approaches to Decision-Making, Cognition and Communication, Berlin July 2016
Human cognition can be usefully understood as a primarily social set of abilities - its survival benefit is from our ability to social organise and hence inhabit a variety of niches. From this point of view any ability makes more sense when put into a social context. This includes our innate ability to judge candidate beliefs in terms of their coherency with our existing beliefs and goals. However studying cognition in its social context implies high complexity, for this reason I describe an agent-based model of coherency based belief within a dynamic network of individuals. Here beliefs might be copied (or discarded) by an individual based upon the change in coherence it causes with its other beliefs, but also that an individual will change their social connections based upon the the coherence of their beliefs with those they socially interact with.
Staged Models for Interdisciplinary ResearchBruce Edmonds
A talk give n at CosyDy, Leeds 12th May 2016.
The papers can be read at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.00903 (this work, soon in PLoSOne) and http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.04024 (the further simplification step, soon in EPJ-B)
The models are at: http://openabm.org/model/4368 and http://openabm.org/model/4686
Risk-aware policy evaluation using agent-based simulationBruce Edmonds
A talk about how modelling of complex issues of policy relevance. It covers some of the tensions and difficulties, as well as some of the unrealistic expectations of this kind of modelling. Rather it is suggested these kinds of model should be used as a kind of risk-analysis. Two examples of this are given.
Talk given in Reykjavik at University of Iceland, 30th Nov 2016.
A talk at the ESSA Silico Summer School in Wageningen, June 2017. It looks at some of the different purposes for a simulation model, and how complicated one should make one's model
Towards Integrating Everything (well at least: ABM, data-mining, qual&quant d...Bruce Edmonds
A talk given at the SKIN3 workshop in Budapest, May 2014 (http://cress.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SKIN/events/third-skin-workshop)
Innovation or other policy-orientated research has tended to take one of two strategies: (a) work with high-level abstractions of macro-level variables or (b) focus on micro-level aspects/areas with simpler mechanisms. Whilst (a) may provide some comfort in the form of forecasts, these are almost useless for policy since they can only be relied upon if nothing much has changed. Although approach (b) may produce some interesting studies which show how complex even small aspects of the involved processes are, with maybe interesting emergent effects, it provides only a small part of the overall picture and little to guide decision making.
Rather, I (with others) suggest a different approach. Instead of aiming to produce some kind of "adequate" theory (usually in the form of a model along with its interpretation), that instead we aim at integrating different kinds of evidence and find the best ways to present these to policy makers in order to help policy-makers 'drive' by providing views of what is happening. Thus (1) utilising the greatest possible range of evidence and (2) providing rich, relevant but synthetic views of this evidence to the policy makers. Any projections should be 'possibilistic' rather than 'probabilistic' - showing the different ways in which social processes might unfold, and help inform the analysis of risks. The talk looks at some of the ways in which this might be done, to integrate micro-level narrative data, time-series data, survey data, network data, big data using a variety of techniques. In this view, models do not disappear, but rather have a different purpose and hence be developed and checked differently.
This shift will involve a change in attitude and approach from both researchers and those in the policy world. Researchers will have to give up the playing for general or abstract theory, satisfying themselves with more gentle and incremental abstraction, whilst also accepting and working with a greater variety of kinds of evidence. They will also have to stop 'conning' the policy world with forecasts, and refuse to provide these as more dangerous than helpful. The policy world will have to stop looking for a magic 'crutch' that will reduce uncertainty (or provide justification for chosen policies) and move towards greater openness with both data and models.
Towards Institutional System Farming
A talk at the Lorentz Workshop on "Emerging Institutions: Design or Evolution?" September 2016, Leiden, NL (https://www.lorentzcenter.nl/lc/web/2016/836/info.php3?wsid=836&venue=Oort)
A Model of Social and Cognitive CoherenceBruce Edmonds
An inbvited talk at the Workshop on Coherence -Based Approaches to Decision-Making, Cognition and Communication, Berlin July 2016
Human cognition can be usefully understood as a primarily social set of abilities - its survival benefit is from our ability to social organise and hence inhabit a variety of niches. From this point of view any ability makes more sense when put into a social context. This includes our innate ability to judge candidate beliefs in terms of their coherency with our existing beliefs and goals. However studying cognition in its social context implies high complexity, for this reason I describe an agent-based model of coherency based belief within a dynamic network of individuals. Here beliefs might be copied (or discarded) by an individual based upon the change in coherence it causes with its other beliefs, but also that an individual will change their social connections based upon the the coherence of their beliefs with those they socially interact with.
Staged Models for Interdisciplinary ResearchBruce Edmonds
A talk give n at CosyDy, Leeds 12th May 2016.
The papers can be read at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.00903 (this work, soon in PLoSOne) and http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.04024 (the further simplification step, soon in EPJ-B)
The models are at: http://openabm.org/model/4368 and http://openabm.org/model/4686
Risk-aware policy evaluation using agent-based simulationBruce Edmonds
A talk about how modelling of complex issues of policy relevance. It covers some of the tensions and difficulties, as well as some of the unrealistic expectations of this kind of modelling. Rather it is suggested these kinds of model should be used as a kind of risk-analysis. Two examples of this are given.
Talk given in Reykjavik at University of Iceland, 30th Nov 2016.
A talk at the ESSA Silico Summer School in Wageningen, June 2017. It looks at some of the different purposes for a simulation model, and how complicated one should make one's model
Towards Integrating Everything (well at least: ABM, data-mining, qual&quant d...Bruce Edmonds
A talk given at the SKIN3 workshop in Budapest, May 2014 (http://cress.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SKIN/events/third-skin-workshop)
Innovation or other policy-orientated research has tended to take one of two strategies: (a) work with high-level abstractions of macro-level variables or (b) focus on micro-level aspects/areas with simpler mechanisms. Whilst (a) may provide some comfort in the form of forecasts, these are almost useless for policy since they can only be relied upon if nothing much has changed. Although approach (b) may produce some interesting studies which show how complex even small aspects of the involved processes are, with maybe interesting emergent effects, it provides only a small part of the overall picture and little to guide decision making.
Rather, I (with others) suggest a different approach. Instead of aiming to produce some kind of "adequate" theory (usually in the form of a model along with its interpretation), that instead we aim at integrating different kinds of evidence and find the best ways to present these to policy makers in order to help policy-makers 'drive' by providing views of what is happening. Thus (1) utilising the greatest possible range of evidence and (2) providing rich, relevant but synthetic views of this evidence to the policy makers. Any projections should be 'possibilistic' rather than 'probabilistic' - showing the different ways in which social processes might unfold, and help inform the analysis of risks. The talk looks at some of the ways in which this might be done, to integrate micro-level narrative data, time-series data, survey data, network data, big data using a variety of techniques. In this view, models do not disappear, but rather have a different purpose and hence be developed and checked differently.
This shift will involve a change in attitude and approach from both researchers and those in the policy world. Researchers will have to give up the playing for general or abstract theory, satisfying themselves with more gentle and incremental abstraction, whilst also accepting and working with a greater variety of kinds of evidence. They will also have to stop 'conning' the policy world with forecasts, and refuse to provide these as more dangerous than helpful. The policy world will have to stop looking for a magic 'crutch' that will reduce uncertainty (or provide justification for chosen policies) and move towards greater openness with both data and models.
Using Data Integration Modelsfor Understanding Complex Social SystemsBruce Edmonds
Describing the use of complex, descriptive simulations to integrate the maximum amount of evidence in a staged manner. With an example from the SCID project (http://www.scid-project.org).
The Post-Truth Drift in Social SimulationBruce Edmonds
A talk at the Social Simulation Conference, Dublin, September 2017.
Abstract
The paper identifies a danger in the field of social simulation a danger of using weasel words to give a false impression to the world about the achievements of our field. Whether this is intentional or unintentional, the effect might be to damage the reputation of the field and impair its development. At the root of this is a need for brutal honesty and openness, something that can be personally difficult and that needs social support. The paper considers some of the subtle ways that this kind of post-truth drift might occur, including: confusion/conflation of modelling purpose, wishing to justify pragmatic limitations in our work, falling back to unvalidated theory, confusing using a model for a way of looking at the world for something more reliable, and seeking protection from critique in vagueness. It calls on social simulation researchers to firmly reject such a drift.
An invited talk given at the Institute for Research into Superdiversity (IRIS), University of Brimingham, 31st Jan 2017
Abstract:
A simulation to illustrate how the complex patterns of cultural and genetic signals might combine to define what we mean by "groups" of people is presented. In this model both (a) how each individual might define their "in group" and (b) how each individual behaves to others in 'in' or 'out' groups can evolve over time. Thus groups are not something that is precisely defined but is something that emerges in the simulation. The point is to illustrate the power of simulation techniques to explore such processes in a non-prescriptive way that takes the micro-macro distinction seriously and represents them within complex simulations. In the particular simulation presented, groups defined by culture strongly emerge as dominant and ethnically defined groups only occur when they are also culturally defined.
Drilling down below opinions: how co-evolving beliefs and social structure mi...Bruce Edmonds
A talk at ODCD2017, Jocob's University, Bremen, July 2017. (http://odcd2017.user.jacobs-university.de/)
The talk looks at an alternative to "linear" models which deal with a euclidean space of opinions (usually a 1D space). This is a model of belief change, where both social influence and internal consistency of beliefs co-evolve with social structure. Thus this goes beyond most opinion dynamics models in a number of ways: (a) it deals with beliefs that may underlie measured opinions (b) the internal coherency among sets of beliefs is important as well as social influence (c) the social structure co-evolves with belief change and (d) the social structures are complex and continually dynamic. The internal consistency of beliefs is based on Thagard's theory of explanatory coherence, which has some empirical support. The model seems to display some of the tensions and processes that are observed in politics, for example: the tension between moderating views so as to connect with the public vs. reinforcing the in-group coherency. It displays a dynamic that can reflect a number of different courses including those that result turning points in opinions.
Part of the Soft systems methodology, Rich Pictures provide a mechanism for learning about complex or ill-defined problems by drawing detailed ("rich") representations of them.
This short introductory webinar explains the basic graphic elements that are normally used in RPs and highlights their value as an action learning process.
As Simple as Possible But No Simpler: Agent-Based Modelling Meets Sociology a...Edmund Chattoe-Brown
A presentation at the Higher Education Group Meeting “Physics and Social Complexity”, Institute of Physics, London, 1 December. This presentation looks at the interface between physics and social science approaches.
Designing Systems that Support Social BehaviorThomas Erickson
By looking at how people interact in face to face situations we can gain insights on how to better design online systems to support social behavior. In particular, this presentation argues that simple visualizations of the presence and activities of participants in online situations can be a valuable design approach.
An Introduction to Agent-Based ModellingBruce Edmonds
An introduction to the technique with two example models of in-group bias and voter turnout.
An invited talk at the BIGSSS Summer Schools in Computational Social Science, at the Jacobs Bremen University, July 2018.
Presentation for the Cognitive Control course (DGCN25) of the Research Master Cognitive Neuroscience at Radboud University on the topic of Cognitive Modeling
I was assigned to be a moderator for one week in the Psych.Foundations of Education course that I am taking this semester. I prepared this presentation as an overview of Social Cognitive Views of Learning, the topic that was discussed during that week.
Using Data Integration Modelsfor Understanding Complex Social SystemsBruce Edmonds
Describing the use of complex, descriptive simulations to integrate the maximum amount of evidence in a staged manner. With an example from the SCID project (http://www.scid-project.org).
The Post-Truth Drift in Social SimulationBruce Edmonds
A talk at the Social Simulation Conference, Dublin, September 2017.
Abstract
The paper identifies a danger in the field of social simulation a danger of using weasel words to give a false impression to the world about the achievements of our field. Whether this is intentional or unintentional, the effect might be to damage the reputation of the field and impair its development. At the root of this is a need for brutal honesty and openness, something that can be personally difficult and that needs social support. The paper considers some of the subtle ways that this kind of post-truth drift might occur, including: confusion/conflation of modelling purpose, wishing to justify pragmatic limitations in our work, falling back to unvalidated theory, confusing using a model for a way of looking at the world for something more reliable, and seeking protection from critique in vagueness. It calls on social simulation researchers to firmly reject such a drift.
An invited talk given at the Institute for Research into Superdiversity (IRIS), University of Brimingham, 31st Jan 2017
Abstract:
A simulation to illustrate how the complex patterns of cultural and genetic signals might combine to define what we mean by "groups" of people is presented. In this model both (a) how each individual might define their "in group" and (b) how each individual behaves to others in 'in' or 'out' groups can evolve over time. Thus groups are not something that is precisely defined but is something that emerges in the simulation. The point is to illustrate the power of simulation techniques to explore such processes in a non-prescriptive way that takes the micro-macro distinction seriously and represents them within complex simulations. In the particular simulation presented, groups defined by culture strongly emerge as dominant and ethnically defined groups only occur when they are also culturally defined.
Drilling down below opinions: how co-evolving beliefs and social structure mi...Bruce Edmonds
A talk at ODCD2017, Jocob's University, Bremen, July 2017. (http://odcd2017.user.jacobs-university.de/)
The talk looks at an alternative to "linear" models which deal with a euclidean space of opinions (usually a 1D space). This is a model of belief change, where both social influence and internal consistency of beliefs co-evolve with social structure. Thus this goes beyond most opinion dynamics models in a number of ways: (a) it deals with beliefs that may underlie measured opinions (b) the internal coherency among sets of beliefs is important as well as social influence (c) the social structure co-evolves with belief change and (d) the social structures are complex and continually dynamic. The internal consistency of beliefs is based on Thagard's theory of explanatory coherence, which has some empirical support. The model seems to display some of the tensions and processes that are observed in politics, for example: the tension between moderating views so as to connect with the public vs. reinforcing the in-group coherency. It displays a dynamic that can reflect a number of different courses including those that result turning points in opinions.
Part of the Soft systems methodology, Rich Pictures provide a mechanism for learning about complex or ill-defined problems by drawing detailed ("rich") representations of them.
This short introductory webinar explains the basic graphic elements that are normally used in RPs and highlights their value as an action learning process.
As Simple as Possible But No Simpler: Agent-Based Modelling Meets Sociology a...Edmund Chattoe-Brown
A presentation at the Higher Education Group Meeting “Physics and Social Complexity”, Institute of Physics, London, 1 December. This presentation looks at the interface between physics and social science approaches.
Designing Systems that Support Social BehaviorThomas Erickson
By looking at how people interact in face to face situations we can gain insights on how to better design online systems to support social behavior. In particular, this presentation argues that simple visualizations of the presence and activities of participants in online situations can be a valuable design approach.
An Introduction to Agent-Based ModellingBruce Edmonds
An introduction to the technique with two example models of in-group bias and voter turnout.
An invited talk at the BIGSSS Summer Schools in Computational Social Science, at the Jacobs Bremen University, July 2018.
Presentation for the Cognitive Control course (DGCN25) of the Research Master Cognitive Neuroscience at Radboud University on the topic of Cognitive Modeling
I was assigned to be a moderator for one week in the Psych.Foundations of Education course that I am taking this semester. I prepared this presentation as an overview of Social Cognitive Views of Learning, the topic that was discussed during that week.
The term got its start in psychoanalytic therapy, but it has slowly worked its way into everyday language. In Sigmund Freud's topographical model of personality, the ego is the aspect of personality that deals with reality. While doing this, the ego also has to cope with the conflicting demands of the id and the superego. The id seeks to fulfil all wants, needs and impulses while the superego tries to get the ego to act in an idealistic and moral manner. What happens when the ego cannot deal with the demands of our desires, the constraints of reality and our own moral standards?
The slides from a class on the relationship of formal modelling and their use, with particular focus on different purposes for modelling and how they can go wrong.
Mixing ABM and policy...what could possibly go wrong?Bruce Edmonds
Invited talk at 19th International Workshop on Multi-Agent Based Simulation at Stockholm on 14th July 2018.
Mixing ABM and Policy ... what could possibly go wrong?
This talk looks at a number of ways in which using ABM in the context of influencing policy can go wrong: during model construction, with model application and other.
It is related to the book chapter:
Aodha, L. and Edmonds, B. (2017) Some pitfalls to beware when applying models to issues of policy relevance. In Edmonds, B. & Meyer, R. (eds.) Simulating Social Complexity - a handbook, 2nd edition. Springer, 801-822.
Possibilistic prediction and risk analyses
A talk given at the EA annual Conference, Bonn, May 2015
Abstract:
It is in the nature of complex systems that predictions that give a probability are not possible.
Indeed I argue that giving "the most likely" or "rough" prediction is more harmful than useful.
Rather an approach which maps out some of the possible outcomes is outlined.
Agent-based modelling is ideal for producing these - including, crucially, possibilities that could not have been conceived just by thinking about it (due to the fact that events can combine in ways that are more complex than the human brain can cope with directly).
A characterisation of the real future possibilities and their nature allows some positive responses to events:
* putting in place 'early warning indicators' for the emergence of identified possibilities
* contingency planning for when they are indicated.
Such an approach would allow policy makers to better 'drive' their decision making, without abnegating responsibility to experts.
Chapters 4,5 and 6Into policymaking and modeling in a comple.docxtiffanyd4
Chapters 4,5 and 6
Into policymaking and modeling in a complex world
From Building a model to adaptive robust decision- making using systems modelling
Features and added value of simulation Models using different modelling approaches supporting policymaking: A comparative analysis.
Chapter Goals and Objectives Overall – students will learn and understand
consequences of complexity in the real-world, and meaningful ways to understand and manage such situations
the implications of complexity and that many social systems are unpredictable by nature, especially when in the presence of structural change (transitions)
natural tendency to criticize the approaches that ignore difficulties and pretend to predict using simplistic models
that managing a complex system requires a good understanding of the dynamics of the system in question—to know, before they occur, some of the real possibilities that might occur and be ready so they can be reacted to as responsively as possible.
4. Policymaking and modeling in a complex world
the word “complexity” can be used to indicate a variety of kinds of difficulties
identification of complexity and uncertainty in policy-making
in very simple physical systems, interactions may give rise to complex behavior, expressed in different types of behavior, ranging from very stable to chaotic
reasons why complex adaptive systems have a strong capacity to self-organize
two of the ways systems are oversimplified: quantification and compartmentalization
models are assessed by their ability to predict/mirror observed aspects of the environments
5. From building a model to adaptive robust decision-making using systems modeling
System Dynamics Modeling and Simulation of Old
✓ methods for modeling and simulating dynamically complex systems
✓ evolutions in modeling and simulation with recent explosive growth in computational power, data, social media, to support decision-making
Recent Innovations and Expected Evolutions
✓ Why often seemingly more revolutionary—innovations have been introduced and demonstrated, but that they have not been massively adopted yet
Current and Expected Evolutions
✓ Three current evolutions expected to further reinforce - “experiential art” to “computational science.”
Future State of Practice of Systems Modeling and Simulation
✓ modeling and simulation with sparse data to modeling and simulation with (near real-time) big data;
✓ simulating and analyzing a few simulation runs to simulating and simultaneously analyzing well-selected ensembles of runs;
✓ using models for intuitive policy testing to using models as instruments for designing adaptive robust robust policies;
✓ developing educational flight simulators to fully integrated decision support.
Features and added value of simulation models using different modelling approaches to policy-making: A Comparative analysis
Foundations of Simulation Modelling
✓ model simplification definitions—smaller, less detailed, le.
Chapters 4,5 and 6Into policymaking and modeling in a comple.docxmccormicknadine86
Chapters 4,5 and 6
Into policymaking and modeling in a complex world
From Building a model to adaptive robust decision- making using systems modelling
Features and added value of simulation Models using different modelling approaches supporting policymaking: A comparative analysis.
Chapter Goals and Objectives Overall – students will learn and understand
consequences of complexity in the real-world, and meaningful ways to understand and manage such situations
the implications of complexity and that many social systems are unpredictable by nature, especially when in the presence of structural change (transitions)
natural tendency to criticize the approaches that ignore difficulties and pretend to predict using simplistic models
that managing a complex system requires a good understanding of the dynamics of the system in question—to know, before they occur, some of the real possibilities that might occur and be ready so they can be reacted to as responsively as possible.
4. Policymaking and modeling in a complex world
the word “complexity” can be used to indicate a variety of kinds of difficulties
identification of complexity and uncertainty in policy-making
in very simple physical systems, interactions may give rise to complex behavior, expressed in different types of behavior, ranging from very stable to chaotic
reasons why complex adaptive systems have a strong capacity to self-organize
two of the ways systems are oversimplified: quantification and compartmentalization
models are assessed by their ability to predict/mirror observed aspects of the environments
5. From building a model to adaptive robust decision-making using systems modeling
System Dynamics Modeling and Simulation of Old
✓ methods for modeling and simulating dynamically complex systems
✓ evolutions in modeling and simulation with recent explosive growth in computational power, data, social media, to support decision-making
Recent Innovations and Expected Evolutions
✓ Why often seemingly more revolutionary—innovations have been introduced and demonstrated, but that they have not been massively adopted yet
Current and Expected Evolutions
✓ Three current evolutions expected to further reinforce - “experiential art” to “computational science.”
Future State of Practice of Systems Modeling and Simulation
✓ modeling and simulation with sparse data to modeling and simulation with (near real-time) big data;
✓ simulating and analyzing a few simulation runs to simulating and simultaneously analyzing well-selected ensembles of runs;
✓ using models for intuitive policy testing to using models as instruments for designing adaptive robust robust policies;
✓ developing educational flight simulators to fully integrated decision support.
Features and added value of simulation models using different modelling approaches to policy-making: A Comparative analysis
Foundations of Simulation Modelling
✓ model simplification definitions—smaller, less detailed, le ...
Slides that describe a modelling framework to represent the process of making things. Presented at the Feb 2016 project meeting of the Digital DIY project..
Mixing fat data, simulation and policy - what could possibly go wrong?Bruce Edmonds
A talk given at the CECAN workshop on "What Good Data could do for Evaluation" at the Alan Turing Institute, 25th Feb. 2019.
Abstract:
In complex situations (which includes most where humans are involved) it is infeasible to predict the impact of any particular policy (or even what is probable). Randomised Control Trials do not tell one: what kinds of situation a policy might work in, what are enablers and inhibitors of the effectiveness of a policy. Here I suggest that using 'fat' data and simulation might allow a possibilistic analysis of policy impact - namely an exploration of what could go surprisingly wrong (or indeed right). Whilst this does not allow the optimisation of policy, it does inform the effective monitoring of policy, and basic contingency planning. However, this requires a different approach to policy - from planning and optimisation to an adaptive approach, with richer continual monitoring and a readiness to tune or adapt policy as data comes in. Examples of this are given concerning domestic water consumption (in the main talk), and in supplementary slides: voter turnout and fishing.
Winter is coming! – how to survive the coming critical storm and demonstrate ...Bruce Edmonds
A talk at the 2014 European Social Simulation Association summer school, at UAB in Barcelona 8th sept 2014
The talk covers some of the symptoms of hype in social simulation and argues that it needs to be more careful and rigourous. In particular that the (current) purpose of a simulation needs to be distinguished between theoretical, explanatory or predictive. Each having their own critieria.
Enhancing a Social Science Model-building Workflow with Interactive Visualisa...Cagatay Turkay
Slides for my talk on our paper titled "Enhancing a Social Science Model-building Workflow with Interactive Visualisation by Turkay, C., Slingsby, A., Lahtinen, K., Butt, S., & Dykes, J., presented at ESANN 2016 in Brugge on April 2016." The talk gives the details of our collaborative work as a team of social scientists and visualisation researchers investigating novel ways to improve the model building process through interactive approaches. Related publication can be found on this link: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/14232/
Different Modelling Purposes - an 'anit-theoretical' approachBruce Edmonds
Models are a tool, not a picture of reality. There are many different uses for models. The intended use of a model - its 'purpose' - affects how it is judged, checked and developed. Much confusion and bad practice in modelling can be attributed to not clearly identifying the intended 'purpose' for a model. Neo-classical Economics is used to illustrate some of these confusions. In some (but not all) uses the model stands in for a theory (at least key aspects of it), but this can happen in different ways and at different levels of abstraction. The talk looks at some of these different ways and advocates a staged, inductive methodology for theory development instead of one that jumps to high generality and simple models which confuse different uses.
A talk given at the Workshop on "From Cases To General Principles - Theory Development Through Agent-Based Modeling" see http://abm-theory.org
Four different views of a policy model: an analysis and some suggestionsBruce Edmonds
A policy model has (at least) four different interpretations: (a) intention: the intention/interpretation of the simulation designer/programmer, (b) validation: the meaning established by the validation of the model in terms of the mapping(s) to sets of evidence, (c) use: the meaning established as a result of the use of a model in a policy making/advice context and (d) interpretation: the narrative interpretation of the policy maker/advisor when justifying decisions made where this refers to a policy model.
These four different interpretations are loosely connected via social processes. The relation between intention and validation is relatively well discussed in the context of “scientific” model specification and development. The relation between use and interpretation has been discussed in a number of specific contexts. However when and how a relationship between the scientific world of intention/validation and the policy world of use/interpretation are established in practice is an area with little active research.
Both personal experience and philosophical considerations suggest that these two worlds are very different in terms of both purpose and method. However this does not mean that there cannot be any well-founded connection between them. The key question is understanding the social processes of how this can happen, what are the conditions that facilitate it happening and what is the nature of the relationship between the four views when it does happen.
Interestingly these issues have been faced and extensively discussed in the field of Artificial Intelligence, which has confronted the distinction between meaning of internal models (loosely, the beliefs of an agent about its environment) in these four ways. The field of AI has not come up with a final solution to these problems, and is itself divided into those that inhabit separate approaches that adopt a subset of these approaches to model meaning. However it is suggestive of some ways forward, namely:
• a recognition of the problem that there are these different ways of attributing meaning to a policy model (and hence avoid some common errors derived from conflating these four views);
• symbol grounding in the sense of learning meanings through repeated use and adjustment (either in response to validation or interpretation views or both);
• and the observation of scientific-policy interaction as it actually occurs (e.g. an ethnographic study of scientist/policy advisor interaction).
Some developments in the area of participatory policy modelling can be seen as forays into this arena, albeit without structured assessment.
Staging Model Abstraction – an example about political participationBruce Edmonds
A presentation at the workshop on ABM and Theory (From Cases to General Principles), Hannover, July 2019
This reports on work where we started with a complex, but evidence driven model, and then modelled that model sto understand and abstract from it. As reported in the paper:
Lafuerza LF, Dyson L, Edmonds B, McKane AJ (2016) Staged Models for Interdisciplinary Research. PLoS ONE, 11(6): e0157261. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0157261
Some supporting slides on modelling purposes and pitfalls when using ABM in policy contexts to accompany discussion on Modelling Pitfalls at the ESSA Summer School, Aberdeen, June 2019
A talk at the workshop on "Agent-Based Models in Philosophy: Prospects and Limitations", Rurh University, Bochum, Germany
Abstract:
ABMs (like other kinds of model) can be used in a purely abstract way, as a kind of thought experiment - a way of thinking about some aspect of the world that is too complicated to hold in our mind (in all its detail). In this way it both informs and complements discursive thought. However there is another set of uses for ABMs - empirical uses - where the mapping between the model and sets of observation-derived data are crucial. For these uses, one has to (a) use the mapping to get from some data to the model (b) use the model for some inference and (c) use the mapping again back to data. This includes both predictive and explanatory uses of ABMs. These are easily distinguishable from abstact uses becuase there is a fixed and well-defined relationship between the model and the data, this is not flexible on a case by case basis. In these cases the reliability comes from the composite (a)-(b)-(c) mapping, so that simplifying step (b) can be counterproductive if that means weakening steps (a) and (c) because it is the strength of the overall chain that is important. Taking the use of models in quantum mechanics as an example, one can see that sometimes the evolution of the formal models driven by empirical adequacy can be more important than the attendent abstract models used to get a feel for what is happening. Although using ABM's for empirical purposes is more challenging than for purely abstract purposes, they are being increasingly used for empirical explanation rather than thought experiments, and there is no reason to suppose that robust empirical adequacy is unachievable.
Social Context
An invited talk at the 2018 Surrey Sociology Conference, Barnett Hill, Surrey, November 2018.
Although there is much evidence that context is crucial to much human cognition and social behaviour, it remains a difficult area to research. In much social science research it is either by-passed or ignored. In some qualitative research context is almost deified with any level of generalisation across contexts being left to the reader. At the other extreme, some qualitative research restricts itself to patterns that are generally detectable - that is the patterns that are left when one aggregates over many different contexts. Context is often used as a 'dustbin concept' to which otherwise unexplained variation is attributed.
This talk looks at some of the ways social context might be actively represented, understood and researched. Firstly the ideas of cognitive then social context are distinguished. Then some possible approaches to researching this are discussed, including: agent-based simulation, a context-sensitive analysis of narrative data and machine learning.
Using agent-based simulation for socio-ecological uncertainty analysisBruce Edmonds
A talk given in the MMU Big Data Centrem, 30th October 2018.
Both social and ecological systems can be highly complex, but the interaction between these two worlds - a socio-ecological system (SES) - can add even greater levels. However, the maintenance of SES are vital to our well being and the health of the planet. We do not know how such systems work in practice and we lack good data about them (especially the ecological side) so predicting the effect of any particular policy is infeasible. Here we present an approach which tries to understand some of the ways in which SES may go wrong, but constructing different complex simulation models and analysing the emergent outcomes. These, in silico, examples can allow for the institution of targeted data gathering instruments that give the earliest possible warning of deleterious outcomes, and thus allow for timely remedial responses. An example of this approach applied to fisheries is described.
How social simulation could help social science deal with contextBruce Edmonds
An invited plenary at Social Simluation 2018, Stockholm.
This points out how context-sensitivity is fundamental to much human social behaviour, but largely bypassed or ignored in social science. I more formal social science, it is usual to assume or fit universal models, even if this covers a lot of different contexts. In qualitative social science context is almost deified, and any generalisation across contexts is passed on to those that learn from it. Agent-based modelling allows for context-sensitive models to be developed and hence the role of context explored and better understood. The talk discussed a framework for analysing narrative text using the Context-Scope-Narrative-Elements (CSNE) framework. It also illustrates a cognitive model that allows for context-dependent knowledge to be implemented wthin an agent in a simulation. The talk ends with a plea to avoid uncecessary or premature summarisation (using averages etc.).
Agent-based modelling,laboratory experiments,and observation in the wildBruce Edmonds
An invited talk at the workshop on "Social complexity and laboratory experiments – testing assumptions and predictions of social simulation models with experiments" at Social Simulation 2018, Stockholm
Culture trumps ethnicity!– Intra-generational cultural evolution and ethnoce...Bruce Edmonds
Essential to understanding the impact of in-group bias on society is the micro-macro link and the complex dynamics involved. Agent-based modelling (ABM) is the only technique that can formally represent this and thus allow for the more rigorous exploration of possi-ble processes and their comparison with observed social phenomena. This talk discusses these issues, providing some examples of some relevant ABMs.
A talk given at the BIGSSS summer school on conflict, Bremen, Jul/Aug 2018.
Socio-Ecological Simulation - a risk-assessment approachBruce Edmonds
An invited talk in Tromsoe, 5 June 2018.
Both social and ecological systems are complex, but when they combine (as when human societies farm/hunt) there is a double complexity. This complexity means it is infeasible to predict the outcome of their interaction and unwise to rely on any prediction. An alternative approach is to use complex simulations to try and discover some possible ways that such systems can go wrong. This can reveal risks that other approaches might miss, due to the fact that more of the complexity is included within the model. Once a risk is identified then measures to monitor its emergence can be implemented, allowing the earliest possible warning of this. An example of this approach applied to a fisheries ecosystem is described.
A talk at the workshop on "Thinking toys (or games) for commoning, Basel, 5/6 April, Switzerland.
This describes a simple model of anonymous donation of resources, with minimal group structuring.
Am open-access paper on this model is at: http://cfpm.org/discussionpapers/152
The model can be freely downloaded from:
http://openABM.org/model/4744
A talk at ESSA@Work, TUHH (Technical University of Hamburg), 24th Nov 2017.
Abstract: Simulation models can only be justified with respect to the models purpose or aim. The talk looks at six common purposes for modelling: prediction, explanation, analogy, theoretical exposition, description, and illustration. Each of these is briefly described, with an example and an brief analysis of the risks to achieving these, and hence how they should be demonstrated. The importance of being explicitly clear about the model purpose is repeatedly emphasised.
Modelling Innovation – some options from probabilistic to radicalBruce Edmonds
A talk on the various kinds of innovation based on Margret Boden's types of creativity . Given at the European Academy, Ahrweiler, Germany 31st May 2017.
Co-developing beliefs and social influence networksBruce Edmonds
Argues that many social phenomena needs ABM models with both cognitive and social change co-developing
Presented at the AISB workshop in Bath, April 2017 on "The power of Immergence...". See last slide for details of where to get the paper and the model
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...Scintica Instrumentation
Intravital microscopy (IVM) is a powerful tool utilized to study cellular behavior over time and space in vivo. Much of our understanding of cell biology has been accomplished using various in vitro and ex vivo methods; however, these studies do not necessarily reflect the natural dynamics of biological processes. Unlike traditional cell culture or fixed tissue imaging, IVM allows for the ultra-fast high-resolution imaging of cellular processes over time and space and were studied in its natural environment. Real-time visualization of biological processes in the context of an intact organism helps maintain physiological relevance and provide insights into the progression of disease, response to treatments or developmental processes.
In this webinar we give an overview of advanced applications of the IVM system in preclinical research. IVIM technology is a provider of all-in-one intravital microscopy systems and solutions optimized for in vivo imaging of live animal models at sub-micron resolution. The system’s unique features and user-friendly software enables researchers to probe fast dynamic biological processes such as immune cell tracking, cell-cell interaction as well as vascularization and tumor metastasis with exceptional detail. This webinar will also give an overview of IVM being utilized in drug development, offering a view into the intricate interaction between drugs/nanoparticles and tissues in vivo and allows for the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in a variety of tissues and organs. This interdisciplinary collaboration continues to drive the advancements of novel therapeutic strategies.
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDASAMIR PANDA
Spectroscopy is a branch of science dealing the study of interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy refers to absorption spectroscopy or reflect spectroscopy in the UV-VIS spectral region.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy is an analytical method that can measure the amount of light received by the analyte.
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.moosaasad1975
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...Sérgio Sacani
The ambient solar wind that flls the heliosphere originates from multiple
sources in the solar corona and is highly structured. It is often described
as high-speed, relatively homogeneous, plasma streams from coronal
holes and slow-speed, highly variable, streams whose source regions are
under debate. A key goal of ESA/NASA’s Solar Orbiter mission is to identify
solar wind sources and understand what drives the complexity seen in the
heliosphere. By combining magnetic feld modelling and spectroscopic
techniques with high-resolution observations and measurements, we show
that the solar wind variability detected in situ by Solar Orbiter in March
2022 is driven by spatio-temporal changes in the magnetic connectivity to
multiple sources in the solar atmosphere. The magnetic feld footpoints
connected to the spacecraft moved from the boundaries of a coronal hole
to one active region (12961) and then across to another region (12957). This
is refected in the in situ measurements, which show the transition from fast
to highly Alfvénic then to slow solar wind that is disrupted by the arrival of
a coronal mass ejection. Our results describe solar wind variability at 0.5 au
but are applicable to near-Earth observatories.
A brief information about the SCOP protein database used in bioinformatics.
The Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) database is a comprehensive and authoritative resource for the structural and evolutionary relationships of proteins. It provides a detailed and curated classification of protein structures, grouping them into families, superfamilies, and folds based on their structural and sequence similarities.
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyLokesh Patil
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate PathwayAADYARAJPANDEY1
Normal Cell Metabolism:
Cellular respiration describes the series of steps that cells use to break down sugar and other chemicals to get the energy we need to function.
Energy is stored in the bonds of glucose and when glucose is broken down, much of that energy is released.
Cell utilize energy in the form of ATP.
The first step of respiration is called glycolysis. In a series of steps, glycolysis breaks glucose into two smaller molecules - a chemical called pyruvate. A small amount of ATP is formed during this process.
Most healthy cells continue the breakdown in a second process, called the Kreb's cycle. The Kreb's cycle allows cells to “burn” the pyruvates made in glycolysis to get more ATP.
The last step in the breakdown of glucose is called oxidative phosphorylation (Ox-Phos).
It takes place in specialized cell structures called mitochondria. This process produces a large amount of ATP. Importantly, cells need oxygen to complete oxidative phosphorylation.
If a cell completes only glycolysis, only 2 molecules of ATP are made per glucose. However, if the cell completes the entire respiration process (glycolysis - Kreb's - oxidative phosphorylation), about 36 molecules of ATP are created, giving it much more energy to use.
IN CANCER CELL:
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
introduction to WARBERG PHENOMENA:
WARBURG EFFECT Usually, cancer cells are highly glycolytic (glucose addiction) and take up more glucose than do normal cells from outside.
Otto Heinrich Warburg (; 8 October 1883 – 1 August 1970) In 1931 was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology for his "discovery of the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme.
WARNBURG EFFECT : cancer cells under aerobic (well-oxygenated) conditions to metabolize glucose to lactate (aerobic glycolysis) is known as the Warburg effect. Warburg made the observation that tumor slices consume glucose and secrete lactate at a higher rate than normal tissues.
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Ana Luísa Pinho
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides means to characterize brain activations in response to behavior. However, cognitive neuroscience has been limited to group-level effects referring to the performance of specific tasks. To obtain the functional profile of elementary cognitive mechanisms, the combination of brain responses to many tasks is required. Yet, to date, both structural atlases and parcellation-based activations do not fully account for cognitive function and still present several limitations. Further, they do not adapt overall to individual characteristics. In this talk, I will give an account of deep-behavioral phenotyping strategies, namely data-driven methods in large task-fMRI datasets, to optimize functional brain-data collection and improve inference of effects-of-interest related to mental processes. Key to this approach is the employment of fast multi-functional paradigms rich on features that can be well parametrized and, consequently, facilitate the creation of psycho-physiological constructs to be modelled with imaging data. Particular emphasis will be given to music stimuli when studying high-order cognitive mechanisms, due to their ecological nature and quality to enable complex behavior compounded by discrete entities. I will also discuss how deep-behavioral phenotyping and individualized models applied to neuroimaging data can better account for the subject-specific organization of domain-general cognitive systems in the human brain. Finally, the accumulation of functional brain signatures brings the possibility to clarify relationships among tasks and create a univocal link between brain systems and mental functions through: (1) the development of ontologies proposing an organization of cognitive processes; and (2) brain-network taxonomies describing functional specialization. To this end, tools to improve commensurability in cognitive science are necessary, such as public repositories, ontology-based platforms and automated meta-analysis tools. I will thus discuss some brain-atlasing resources currently under development, and their applicability in cognitive as well as clinical neuroscience.
This pdf is about the Schizophrenia.
For more details visit on YouTube; @SELF-EXPLANATORY;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAiarMZDNhe1A3Rnpr_WkzA/videos
Thanks...!
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlandsRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Astronomy Update- Curiosity’s exploration of Mars _ Local Briefs _ leadertele...
Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world
1. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 1
Policy Making using Modelling in a
Complex world
Bruce Edmonds
Centre for Policy Modelling
Manchester Metropolitan University
2. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 2
or… towards what might be in a ‘Cyan Book’
(halfway between the aqua and green books)
3. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 3
Introduction
Part 0
4. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 4
Simple systems…
… may be complicated but behave in predictable
ways, allowing them to be represented by models...
• where one can use them to numerically forecast
• where uncertainty can be analytically estimated
• where one can get rough estimates cheaply, and
better estimates with increasing investment
• which one can sensibly plan and execute ot
systematically
• where there is a basically one right way of doing it
• so that one can fully understand the model
5. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 5
A double pendulum
Even with only two bits of wood the result can be complex
An Example Video is at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czLIj-4suOk
A trace of the motion:
6. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 6
The Main Point of the Talk…
…is that complex systems need to be dealt with in a
different way to that of simple systems...
...not only modelled in a different way using different
techniques but also how models about complex
systems are used in any policy development
process needs to change.
• Complex modelling will be increasingly important
as we try to develop better policies and deal with
complex and fast moving situations
• But it can not be ‘business as usual’ – just doing
better modelling with the same modeller–policy
actor relationship will not work well
7. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 7
Structure of the (rest of the) Talk
1. A bit about modelling context, purposes
and tensions
2. Some of the underlying assumptions
and habits that need to change
3. An example model – Stefano Picascia’s
Modelling of the Housing Rental Market
4. Some suggestions as to ways forward
8. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 8
Modelling, its context, purposes and
tensions
Part 1
9. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 9
Some of the Context
• An increasingly professionalised coterie of skilled
modellers within government (GORS etc.)
• Leading to new standards for modelling and
analysis within government – the ‘Aqua Book’ –
which lays down very sensible guidelines for
model development and quality assurance
• Within the context of the ‘Green Book’ – a
framework for policy development and evaluation
• Along side a set of academic and other experts
increasingly willing to be involved in helping
government model and analyse complex stuff
10. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 10
Different modelling purposes
Models can be used for a wide variety of different
purposes, and these impact upon the kind of
techniques needed and its difficulties, e.g.
• Forecasting – predicting unknown (e.g. future)
situations and outcomes
• Explanation – understanding how known
outcomes might have come about
• Theoretical Exploration – understanding a
complex model by exploring some of its properties
and behaviours
• Analogy – using a model as a way of thinking
about something else
11. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 11
A picture of modelling
whatisobservedor
measured
themodel
themodellers
themodelusers
12. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 12
Model Scope
• The scope of a model is the conditions under which it
is useful for its planned purpose
• Whilst this is implicit and stable for many simple
systems, this is not the case for many complex ones
• Thus trying to make scope explicit is important, and
these relate to model assumptions
• A process not modelled (and hence outside its scope)
can overwhelm the results…
• ..but in complex systems internal processes of
change can also emerge, and some of these can be
usefully modelled (but only in more complex ways)
13. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 13
Possible modelling trade-offs
• Some desiderata for
models: validity,
formality, simplicity and
generality
• these are difficult to
obtain simultaneously
(for complex systems)
• there is some sort of
complicated trade-off
between them (for each
modelling exercise)
simplicity
generality
validity
formality
Analogy
Solvable
Mathematical
Model
Data
What
Policy
Actors
Want
14. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 14
Some underlying assumptions and
habits
Part 2
15. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 15
The Green Book
• Basically a formulation of cost-benefit analysis
• As if an economist had written a manual for policy
actors in how to think (i.e. as their theory states)
• It does have some useful advice on generating
and considering alternatives and trying to judge
uncertainty
But does assume that one can:
1. list the main alternative options
2. forecast the results of these
3. put meaningful numerical values on these
16. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 16
Quantification
• Implicit throughout the Green Book approach
• Makes life much easier for policy actors
• Especially when asked to justify an approach
• But can be more misleading than helpful because it
gives a false impression of accuracy
• And implicitly leads to a focus on the measurable and
that things will ‘average out’ etc.
• Was a limitation of purely mathematical approaches,
but computer simulation does not have to be focused
on these aspects
• Collecting qualitatively different possible outcomes
might be much more useful
17. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 17
No gradual approximation, but
scope-limited usefulness
It is often assumed that as time and effort increase
the accuracy of the results improve, but this is not
the case with complex systems and models
Rather in order for the outcomes to be within scope
enough iterative development has to occur
Before this the results are worse than nothing
Time and cost
Error
18. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 18
That (real, complex) systems ever get
near an equilibrium
• From economics, there is an obsession with
equilibrium in much modelling
• Where, even when it is known equilibria are not
observed, they are assumed in order to forecast
• Most macro economic models (and many cost-based
planning models) do this
• In complex systems, even when they are in near-
equilibrium state, they can move away from this
• Good when things are not changing very much,
almost useless for turning points or when structural
change is occurring
• (See forthcoming open-access book “Non-Equilibrium
Social Science”)
19. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 19
The Aqua Book
• Is a standard for the development and quality
assurance of modelling/analysis for policy
• Has a lot of very sensible advice (I wish that my
academic colleagues had similar standards)
• It distinguishes different roles involved in the
modelling process, which clarify the chain of
command/assurance and recommends extensive and
frequent communication between them
• However, it only talks about the responsibilities of the
modelling team, as if modelling can be an ‘on demand
service’ for policy actors
• Mostly it is written for the cases where the model or
situation is basically simple
• See my recent review in JASSS (jasss.surrey.ac.uk)
20. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 20
That different models should agree
• Sometimes policy actors complain that different
models of the same phenomena disagree
• But this is inevitable where different models are
taking different approaches and making different
assumptions – the results are relative to these
• One can try and force models to agree, but in the
process one eliminates the variety of modelling
assumptions (in return for an illusion of certainty)
• In risk-analyses one wants variety so that it is
more likely that future possibilities can be
anticipated
21. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 21
Planning and Managing Modelling
• In a simple case one can apply an approach (as
described in the Aqua book) where one carefully
plans, manages and evaluates models
• As if this was like building a bridge!
• But in complex cases complications about what
needs to be included or not requires a more
iterative approach…
• ...where models are repeatedly built for a purpose
and the lessons learnt as you go along...
• Becuase the difficulties can not be predicted in
complex cases!
22. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 22
Compartmentalism
• That some problems can be separated into
smaller sub-problems which can be modelled
more simply
• Not true in many complex cases, where the scope
of modelling is dependent on having enough of
the key processes represented
• Sometimes several different modelling
approaches with different (but overlapping)
assumptions can be more helpful
• Just fiddling, incrementally expanding an existing
(and failing) model will probably not help here
23. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 23
Instrumental Institutionalisation
• Even a wrong or clearly inadequate model can be a
useful part of a policy development process if the
model is flexible enough
• Because when used repeatedly its limitations and
oddities can be fixed with institutional ‘kludges’
• Becoming something more like a consistent ‘base
line’ from which policy can be debated
• e.g. the standard transport models
• But as these are instutionalised, they are increasingly
difficult to change because the other policy processes
have adapted to it
• Resulting in a situation similar to the apocryphal
‘slowly boiled frog’ story – at each time the motivation
to change is less than the perceived advantage of
doing so, in which case wait for a crisis to occur!
24. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 24
An Example: A Model of the Rental
Housing Market
Part 3
25. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 25
The model
• By Stefano Picascia, an PhD student of mine,
now at Sienna University, Italy
• Is an agent-based simulation that represents both
tenants and developers co-adapting
• Is geographically based with tenants making
decisions as where to move to based on location
as well as quality of housing and price
• Developers put in captial to build/rennovate
housing for tenants
• Rents are determined by the quality and prices of
surrounding housing
26. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 26
The Manchester Case
Waves of price
changes can
spread
Can have different
outcomes each
time it is run
Has also been
applied to London
and Beirut
Video of model running is at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtYTtkPrACM
27. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 27
Average prices in a run
28. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 28
Different Sectors of the City in a run
29. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 29
What it does and does not tell us
In the model (which is the private rental sector only):
• That change is fundamentally internally driven as
well as due to outside events
• Price oscillations are endemic to the system
• That some regions of cities will be stuck as low
quality housing for long periods of time
• The very high price regions stay that way
• That under certain conditions sudden
‘gentrification’ may occur to some degree
• For poorer districts decline is gradual and
continual between any such periods
30. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 30
Some ways forward and conclusions
for complex cases
Part 4
31. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 31
From Probabilistic to Possibilistic
• When outcomes can not be sensibly forecast…
• And especially numerically forecast…
• …where even probability zones or 90% bounds
are misleading
• Then moving to an approach that models and
understand (more of) underlying processes...
• ...in terms of the different kinds of outcome might
be much more informative
• Each outcome tagged with its own assumptions
and scopes (if they differ)
32. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 32
From Forecasting to Risk Analysis
• However much one might like forecasting, often it is simply
not possible…
• ...let alone in a way such that the outcomes from different
options can be compared!
• Predicting outcomes can be more misleading than helpful
• Rather it may be more approapriate to use models for risk
analysis – finding all the ways a policy might go wrong (or
right!)
• Techniques are available to help discover and understand
how endogenous processes might result in different future
possibilities
• Which can then inform the design of ‘early warning’
monitors giving the most immediate feedback to policy
makers
33. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 33
Informing the adaptive ‘driving’ of
policy
• Complex models are no good for policy makers!
• Because they have to make decisions on grounds
they understand and know the reliability of
• They can not (and should not) delegate this to
‘experts’ and their inscrutable models
• Rather modellers should use their modelling to
understand the key emergent kinds of outcome
• To inform:
– the consideration of these kinds of outcome
– the design of appropriate data visalisations
– the design of ‘earl warning indicators
• …So that policy can adapt to changing trends and
events as quickly and fluidly as possible
34. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 34
Conclusions
• Modelling of complex phenomena is not cheap or
quick and requires iterative development
• It will not forecast the impact of potential policies
or events, but can anticipate possible future
outcomes in a way intuition can not
• There will always be a ‘scope’ – a set of
conditions/assumptions a model depends upon
• But a good model can repay its investment in
terms of cost and improving people’s lives many,
many times over
35. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 35
Summary
It is no good wishing that the world or
modelling is simple and trying to ‘force’ it to
be so, one has to adapt to suit reality…
…this includes how models and modelling
are used by the policy process
36. Policy Making using Modelling in a Complex world, Bruce Edmonds, CECAN, London, 20th July 2016. slide 36
The End
The Centre for Policy Modelling:
http://cfpm.org
These slides will be available at: http://slideshare.net/BruceEdmonds
Stefano’s work was
developed under this
project, funded by
the EPSRC, grant
number EP/H02171X
Editor's Notes
I am not claiming that such trade-offs are fixed, universal or simple
Comes from modelling experience
Talk about validity, formality, complexity, generality