Interview presentation: Outline the current policy issues regarding UK higher education and the potential impact these may have on the role of QAA, July 2015
This presentation provides an overview of HEFCE's learning gain programme, including pilot projects, research activities, and lessons learned. Key activities include pilot projects at over 60 institutions measuring different aspects of learning gain, a national mixed methodology project longitudinally assessing over 2,500 students, and the Higher Education Learning Gain Analysis group investigating tradeoffs between validity and data collection burden. The presentation reflects on challenges of student participation, defining and measuring learning gain, and opportunities for enhancing teaching and learning based on learning gain insights.
Yvonne Hawkins discusses the Higher Education Funding Council for England's (HEFCE) learning gain programme, which aims to develop methods for measuring student learning and improvement during their time in higher education. Some key activities of the programme include pilot projects at institutions, a national project measuring learning gain, and analyzing administrative data. HEFCE is also developing an online toolkit of peer-reviewed learning gain methodologies to help institutions select appropriate approaches. Finally, Hawkins notes the Office for Students will need to consider learning gain in relation to its new regulatory objectives.
This document discusses key challenges around widening participation in higher education and potential ways to address them. It identifies several groups that face barriers including white working class males, black and minority ethnic students, and students with disabilities. It also notes gaps in participation for certain geographic areas and a need to focus on lifelong learning and social mobility beyond just young full-time students. The document proposes priorities like improving postgraduate progression, outcomes data, and evaluating impact. It discusses potential reforms to the Teaching Excellence Framework, the new Office for Students, and aspects of student finance and teaching grants.
Quality Frameworks for Online Education EMOOCs2017EADTU
The document discusses quality frameworks for online education and MOOCs. It notes that quality is important for pedagogical reasons, completion rates, and delivering inclusive education. Quality can be checked by evaluating course design, objectives, and impact on learners and institutions. Quality is viewed primarily from the learner's perspective and is connected to instructional design, content, and technology. Challenges to ensuring quality include the varied aims of MOOCs and participants. More holistic models consider quality from multiple dimensions and perspectives. Quality assurance approaches range from compliance checks to support for enhancement. Frameworks should accommodate different models and goals of institutions.
In three parts the presentation considers:
What challenges are there in assessing the new European Standard and Guideline for Quality Assurance in Higher Education on Student Centred Learning?
What indicators an be used to measured Student Centred Learning in Higher Education Institutions?
What does an increased focus on student-centred learning mean for the Higher Education sector more generally?
Presented at the PASCL Final Conference in Brussels on 27/05/2016
HEIR conference 8-9 September 2014: Forsyth and StubbsRachel Forsyth
Rewriting the Rules: Institutional procedural change based on analysis of student feedback
As part of a large JISC-supported institutional project on assessment and feedback, two different types of institutional data were analysed to identify potential changes to assessment procedures and practice. Comments from institutional student survey data were analysed to identify 10,000 comments relating to assessment. Coding of these comments enabled the project team to identify a series of areas for change which were common across the institution, rather than just using the survey data for course-level changes, which had happened in the past. This led to the production of new institutional assessment procedures designed to improve the student experience. Institutional records about assignment types, which had been produced simply to support course validation, were then analysed to discover the ten most common types of assignment in use across the institution. Detailed guidance on implementing the new procedures was then developed for these ten assignment types, which accounted for two-thirds of the total number of assignments being taken by students. The combination of data from different parts of the institution has enabled change to be made and supported in a way novel to the university.
This presentation provides an overview of HEFCE's learning gain programme, including pilot projects, research activities, and lessons learned. Key activities include pilot projects at over 60 institutions measuring different aspects of learning gain, a national mixed methodology project longitudinally assessing over 2,500 students, and the Higher Education Learning Gain Analysis group investigating tradeoffs between validity and data collection burden. The presentation reflects on challenges of student participation, defining and measuring learning gain, and opportunities for enhancing teaching and learning based on learning gain insights.
Yvonne Hawkins discusses the Higher Education Funding Council for England's (HEFCE) learning gain programme, which aims to develop methods for measuring student learning and improvement during their time in higher education. Some key activities of the programme include pilot projects at institutions, a national project measuring learning gain, and analyzing administrative data. HEFCE is also developing an online toolkit of peer-reviewed learning gain methodologies to help institutions select appropriate approaches. Finally, Hawkins notes the Office for Students will need to consider learning gain in relation to its new regulatory objectives.
This document discusses key challenges around widening participation in higher education and potential ways to address them. It identifies several groups that face barriers including white working class males, black and minority ethnic students, and students with disabilities. It also notes gaps in participation for certain geographic areas and a need to focus on lifelong learning and social mobility beyond just young full-time students. The document proposes priorities like improving postgraduate progression, outcomes data, and evaluating impact. It discusses potential reforms to the Teaching Excellence Framework, the new Office for Students, and aspects of student finance and teaching grants.
Quality Frameworks for Online Education EMOOCs2017EADTU
The document discusses quality frameworks for online education and MOOCs. It notes that quality is important for pedagogical reasons, completion rates, and delivering inclusive education. Quality can be checked by evaluating course design, objectives, and impact on learners and institutions. Quality is viewed primarily from the learner's perspective and is connected to instructional design, content, and technology. Challenges to ensuring quality include the varied aims of MOOCs and participants. More holistic models consider quality from multiple dimensions and perspectives. Quality assurance approaches range from compliance checks to support for enhancement. Frameworks should accommodate different models and goals of institutions.
In three parts the presentation considers:
What challenges are there in assessing the new European Standard and Guideline for Quality Assurance in Higher Education on Student Centred Learning?
What indicators an be used to measured Student Centred Learning in Higher Education Institutions?
What does an increased focus on student-centred learning mean for the Higher Education sector more generally?
Presented at the PASCL Final Conference in Brussels on 27/05/2016
HEIR conference 8-9 September 2014: Forsyth and StubbsRachel Forsyth
Rewriting the Rules: Institutional procedural change based on analysis of student feedback
As part of a large JISC-supported institutional project on assessment and feedback, two different types of institutional data were analysed to identify potential changes to assessment procedures and practice. Comments from institutional student survey data were analysed to identify 10,000 comments relating to assessment. Coding of these comments enabled the project team to identify a series of areas for change which were common across the institution, rather than just using the survey data for course-level changes, which had happened in the past. This led to the production of new institutional assessment procedures designed to improve the student experience. Institutional records about assignment types, which had been produced simply to support course validation, were then analysed to discover the ten most common types of assignment in use across the institution. Detailed guidance on implementing the new procedures was then developed for these ten assignment types, which accounted for two-thirds of the total number of assignments being taken by students. The combination of data from different parts of the institution has enabled change to be made and supported in a way novel to the university.
Presented to the Board of Higher Education and Board of Elementary and Secondary Education at the joint meeting on January 26, 2016 at Roxbury Community College.
Camille Kandiko Howson QAA Student Engagement Sheffield Hallam University Mar...viscabarca
This Quality Assurance Agency (QAA)-funded research project explored the views of students entering higher education in the four countries of the UK in 2012-13 and those entering in earlier years, to investigate their perceptions and expectations of the quality of their learning experience and the academic standards of their chosen programmes of study. This project provides illustrative examples of the issues affecting student perceptions and expectations regarding quality and standards in the first year of a funding model in England that is significantly different both to that in existence in previous years and to that operated in the other countries of the UK. Research consisted of conducting interviews and focus groups with over 150 students (primarily Years 1 and 2) at 16 institutional locations, across a range of mission groups, institutional types and UK-wide geographical location. Concept maps of students’ higher education experience were collected along with transcripts of interviews.
Learn@UW Executive Committee Roadmap Presentation, July 2014Tanya Joosten
This document outlines a roadmap for guiding decisions around academic technology at the University of Wisconsin System. It details a process from September 2013 to July 2014 involving planning, information gathering, and determining outcomes. The goals are to prioritize funding for instructional applications, build capacity for future needs, and understand the learning ecosystem. Key aspects of the proposed roadmap include continuing a system-wide learning management system, constructing faculty support structures, understanding student needs, developing a UW System community, and identifying guidelines and practices. Next steps include gathering feedback, assessing implications, prioritizing goals, and identifying implementation steps.
This document outlines strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for a university's learning and teaching (L and T) activities. The strengths include fellowships, peer assessment, a strategic plan, and an established learning, teaching, and information center (LTIC). Opportunities include technological developments, discipline and subject research, collaborations, and the teaching excellence framework (TEF). Weaknesses include the LTIC being under-resourced and bureaucracy. Threats involve funding reductions, increased competition, unmanaged student expectations, and the TEF's metrics and timescales.
This document discusses quality assurance and qualifications frameworks in promoting mobility and recognition across national, bilateral, regional and global levels. It provides examples of quality assurance standards and guidelines in Europe as well as the role of qualifications frameworks. The Irish experience with its integrated agency for quality and qualifications is highlighted, with the agency responsible for the National Framework of Qualifications and quality assurance of higher education institutions and programs, both domestic and transnational. Principles for quality assurance agencies in coordinating cross-border reviews to facilitate mutual understanding and trust while lessening regulatory burdens are outlined.
The STaR Chart Long-Range Plan for Technology 2006-2020 outlines goals for students, parents, educators, and the community. The plan aims to provide all groups 24/7 access to digital resources and tools to improve communication and collaboration. Students will be prepared for career requirements and higher academic performance. Educators will gain more access to student information to create individualized instruction. The community will benefit from more efficient resource use and increased educational decision making.
Carlos Santiago, Senior Deputy Commissioner for Academic Affairs, presented the first half of this presentation on Academic Transfer pathways.
Dale Allen, Vice President for Community Engagement at Quinsigamond Community College and Phil Sisson, Provost/Vice President of Academic & Student Affairs at Middlesex Community College presented the second half of this presentation on Guided Pathways to Success.
This was presented at the March 10, 2015 Board of Higher Education meeting.
For more information, please visit www.mass.edu.
SKEIN for FE provides a robust external evaluation of a college's continuing professional development and learning (CPDL) provision against international benchmarks. The evaluation involves collecting evidence from existing documents, staff surveys, and interviews during a one day visit. This results in a diagnostic report identifying strengths and weaknesses according to six benchmarks: collaboration, use of expertise, use of evidence, needs analysis, and leadership of professional learning. The evaluation helps colleges improve teaching quality and enhances Ofsted evidence by linking staff learning to student learning. It also identifies effective practices and next steps for development.
Presented to the Board of Higher Education by Susan Lane, Senior Advisor to the Commissioner for P16 Access & Alignment Policy, and Jeff Wulfson, Deputy Commissioner of the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Presented by Carlos E. Santiago, Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Higher Education, at the June 20, 2017 meeting of the Massachusetts Board of Higher Education.
This document proposes a life-cycle model for evaluating the quality of digital educational content. It analyzes quality assurance needs through defining a content life-cycle model using a top-down approach. It also synthesizes certification guidelines through a bottom-up approach based on an educational institution's experience. The goal is to map stakeholders, needs, quality attributes, and characteristics to metrics for a quality standard. The methodology develops both process and data views to define analysis, design, and development phases as well as produce a product. Initial results include a dual standard with 8 quality characteristics, 30 sub-characteristics, and 72 metrics. Future work involves validating the standard and creating a verification and validation tool.
Working on the Relationship: Quality Assurance as a Tool for Improving Labour...Anthony Fisher Camilleri
While ensuring student employability, improving cooperation with the labour market and acting as engines for economic growth are increasingly core missions for universities, they are still often weakly represented in Quality Assurance procedures. Using data from a number of EU projects, including PHExcel, HAPHE and Beehives, as well as the upcoming ISO Management Systems for educational organizations (ISO 21001), the presentation will consider a variety of quality approaches which can help institutions in designing, implementing, monitoring and improving their relationship with the labour market, and give tips on their practical implementation.
Delivered at the SPACE Annual Conference in Ghent, on 20.04.2016.
Presented by Pat Marshall, Deputy Commissioner for Academic Affairs & Student Success, and Christine Williams, Director of Strategic Initiatives for Academic Affairs & Student Success, at the June 20, 2017 meeting of the Massachusetts Board of Higher Education.
The document proposes revisions to the program approval process for public higher education institutions in Massachusetts. Key changes include:
1. Requiring institutions to indicate how new program proposals align with their strategic plan in their letter of intent.
2. Circulating letters of intent to the Advisory Committee on Academic Programs and the Statewide Policy Committee for comment.
3. Having the Board of Higher Education review proposals to ensure alignment with system goals and consideration of factors like regional economic needs and affordable costs.
4. Establishing a timeline for implementing the new process starting in March 2017.
The document outlines an enrollment management plan for Huston-Tillotson University. The plan seeks to involve all university stakeholders in developing a long-term enrollment strategy. It establishes a vision of providing leadership in enrollment management and ensuring a qualified, diverse student population. Goals include expanding recruitment activities and upgrading technology to better manage enrollment services. Specific recruitment goals and strategies are presented, such as increasing applications and in-state enrollment through improved communication plans and recruitment services.
Right Here; Right Now: Providing the Information your Students Need and your...Marieke Guy
The document discusses the regulatory requirements for UK higher education institutions to provide accurate and comprehensive information to students. The Quality Assurance Agency and Competition and Markets Authority have issued guidance stating that students must receive clear details about programs prior to enrollment. However, reviews have found that many universities fail to disclose all relevant information about course structures, costs, and quality indicators. The document urges institutions to ensure their digital information is thorough, accessible, and up-to-date in order to comply with consumer protection laws and meet students' informational needs.
Presented to the Board of Higher Education and Board of Elementary and Secondary Education at the joint meeting on January 26, 2016 at Roxbury Community College.
Camille Kandiko Howson QAA Student Engagement Sheffield Hallam University Mar...viscabarca
This Quality Assurance Agency (QAA)-funded research project explored the views of students entering higher education in the four countries of the UK in 2012-13 and those entering in earlier years, to investigate their perceptions and expectations of the quality of their learning experience and the academic standards of their chosen programmes of study. This project provides illustrative examples of the issues affecting student perceptions and expectations regarding quality and standards in the first year of a funding model in England that is significantly different both to that in existence in previous years and to that operated in the other countries of the UK. Research consisted of conducting interviews and focus groups with over 150 students (primarily Years 1 and 2) at 16 institutional locations, across a range of mission groups, institutional types and UK-wide geographical location. Concept maps of students’ higher education experience were collected along with transcripts of interviews.
Learn@UW Executive Committee Roadmap Presentation, July 2014Tanya Joosten
This document outlines a roadmap for guiding decisions around academic technology at the University of Wisconsin System. It details a process from September 2013 to July 2014 involving planning, information gathering, and determining outcomes. The goals are to prioritize funding for instructional applications, build capacity for future needs, and understand the learning ecosystem. Key aspects of the proposed roadmap include continuing a system-wide learning management system, constructing faculty support structures, understanding student needs, developing a UW System community, and identifying guidelines and practices. Next steps include gathering feedback, assessing implications, prioritizing goals, and identifying implementation steps.
This document outlines strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for a university's learning and teaching (L and T) activities. The strengths include fellowships, peer assessment, a strategic plan, and an established learning, teaching, and information center (LTIC). Opportunities include technological developments, discipline and subject research, collaborations, and the teaching excellence framework (TEF). Weaknesses include the LTIC being under-resourced and bureaucracy. Threats involve funding reductions, increased competition, unmanaged student expectations, and the TEF's metrics and timescales.
This document discusses quality assurance and qualifications frameworks in promoting mobility and recognition across national, bilateral, regional and global levels. It provides examples of quality assurance standards and guidelines in Europe as well as the role of qualifications frameworks. The Irish experience with its integrated agency for quality and qualifications is highlighted, with the agency responsible for the National Framework of Qualifications and quality assurance of higher education institutions and programs, both domestic and transnational. Principles for quality assurance agencies in coordinating cross-border reviews to facilitate mutual understanding and trust while lessening regulatory burdens are outlined.
The STaR Chart Long-Range Plan for Technology 2006-2020 outlines goals for students, parents, educators, and the community. The plan aims to provide all groups 24/7 access to digital resources and tools to improve communication and collaboration. Students will be prepared for career requirements and higher academic performance. Educators will gain more access to student information to create individualized instruction. The community will benefit from more efficient resource use and increased educational decision making.
Carlos Santiago, Senior Deputy Commissioner for Academic Affairs, presented the first half of this presentation on Academic Transfer pathways.
Dale Allen, Vice President for Community Engagement at Quinsigamond Community College and Phil Sisson, Provost/Vice President of Academic & Student Affairs at Middlesex Community College presented the second half of this presentation on Guided Pathways to Success.
This was presented at the March 10, 2015 Board of Higher Education meeting.
For more information, please visit www.mass.edu.
SKEIN for FE provides a robust external evaluation of a college's continuing professional development and learning (CPDL) provision against international benchmarks. The evaluation involves collecting evidence from existing documents, staff surveys, and interviews during a one day visit. This results in a diagnostic report identifying strengths and weaknesses according to six benchmarks: collaboration, use of expertise, use of evidence, needs analysis, and leadership of professional learning. The evaluation helps colleges improve teaching quality and enhances Ofsted evidence by linking staff learning to student learning. It also identifies effective practices and next steps for development.
Presented to the Board of Higher Education by Susan Lane, Senior Advisor to the Commissioner for P16 Access & Alignment Policy, and Jeff Wulfson, Deputy Commissioner of the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Presented by Carlos E. Santiago, Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Higher Education, at the June 20, 2017 meeting of the Massachusetts Board of Higher Education.
This document proposes a life-cycle model for evaluating the quality of digital educational content. It analyzes quality assurance needs through defining a content life-cycle model using a top-down approach. It also synthesizes certification guidelines through a bottom-up approach based on an educational institution's experience. The goal is to map stakeholders, needs, quality attributes, and characteristics to metrics for a quality standard. The methodology develops both process and data views to define analysis, design, and development phases as well as produce a product. Initial results include a dual standard with 8 quality characteristics, 30 sub-characteristics, and 72 metrics. Future work involves validating the standard and creating a verification and validation tool.
Working on the Relationship: Quality Assurance as a Tool for Improving Labour...Anthony Fisher Camilleri
While ensuring student employability, improving cooperation with the labour market and acting as engines for economic growth are increasingly core missions for universities, they are still often weakly represented in Quality Assurance procedures. Using data from a number of EU projects, including PHExcel, HAPHE and Beehives, as well as the upcoming ISO Management Systems for educational organizations (ISO 21001), the presentation will consider a variety of quality approaches which can help institutions in designing, implementing, monitoring and improving their relationship with the labour market, and give tips on their practical implementation.
Delivered at the SPACE Annual Conference in Ghent, on 20.04.2016.
Presented by Pat Marshall, Deputy Commissioner for Academic Affairs & Student Success, and Christine Williams, Director of Strategic Initiatives for Academic Affairs & Student Success, at the June 20, 2017 meeting of the Massachusetts Board of Higher Education.
The document proposes revisions to the program approval process for public higher education institutions in Massachusetts. Key changes include:
1. Requiring institutions to indicate how new program proposals align with their strategic plan in their letter of intent.
2. Circulating letters of intent to the Advisory Committee on Academic Programs and the Statewide Policy Committee for comment.
3. Having the Board of Higher Education review proposals to ensure alignment with system goals and consideration of factors like regional economic needs and affordable costs.
4. Establishing a timeline for implementing the new process starting in March 2017.
The document outlines an enrollment management plan for Huston-Tillotson University. The plan seeks to involve all university stakeholders in developing a long-term enrollment strategy. It establishes a vision of providing leadership in enrollment management and ensuring a qualified, diverse student population. Goals include expanding recruitment activities and upgrading technology to better manage enrollment services. Specific recruitment goals and strategies are presented, such as increasing applications and in-state enrollment through improved communication plans and recruitment services.
Right Here; Right Now: Providing the Information your Students Need and your...Marieke Guy
The document discusses the regulatory requirements for UK higher education institutions to provide accurate and comprehensive information to students. The Quality Assurance Agency and Competition and Markets Authority have issued guidance stating that students must receive clear details about programs prior to enrollment. However, reviews have found that many universities fail to disclose all relevant information about course structures, costs, and quality indicators. The document urges institutions to ensure their digital information is thorough, accessible, and up-to-date in order to comply with consumer protection laws and meet students' informational needs.
UDOL: Quality Frameworks for Online EducationEADTU
This document discusses quality frameworks for online education. It covers three main areas of online education provision: degree education, continuing education/professional development, and open education. It also discusses challenges in designing online courses and ensuring quality, the need for innovative pedagogies and learning design, and ensuring quality assurance frameworks can adapt to different online education approaches and innovations. National quality assurance agencies need to develop expertise in evaluating new teaching models and support innovation in online education.
e-assessment in Scotland's Colleges - 2013 contextsWalter Patterson
This document discusses improving the use of e-assessment in Scotland. It identifies the key stakeholders as colleges, teaching staff, and students. The stakeholders are providing resources and training to promote e-assessment. Current contexts include budget cuts and increased competition. Opportunities include engaging a smaller number of entities and consideration of efficiency savings. Expected outcomes are a clear engagement strategy with short and long term goals to support the sector and ensure e-assessment is included in institutional strategies.
This document describes how Northeastern University's College of Professional Studies built an enrollment and retention model from scratch for its continuing education students. It outlines challenges with inconsistent data across legacy systems and defines cohorts by fiscal year. The model tracks cohort returning and graduating rates over multiple years. This provides benchmarks to prioritize recruitment, identify data issues, and predict future enrollments for strategic planning, budgeting, and program evaluation. The next steps are to expand modeling to identify predictors of retention and continue industry leadership in this area.
The PASS-IT project evaluated the use of computer-assisted assessment (CAA) across schools and colleges in Scotland. Key findings included that CAA was found to be a feasible alternative to paper-based assessment and did not disadvantage students. Benefits identified were instant feedback, increased student motivation, and potential for more flexible assessment. Barriers included technical issues, lack of infrastructure, and concerns about online assessment for high-stakes exams. Lessons learned included the need for quality assurance processes, staff training, and a phased approach combining online and paper assessments.
Quality frameworks for e-learning (SIEAD 2018, Brazil)Jon Rosewell
A contribution to INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON OPEN AND DISTANCE EDUCATION (SIEAD-BR 2018) 22nd October 2018.
"Contributions from Open and Distance Education to Higher Education Quality: present and future"
"Contribuições da Educação Aberta e à Distância para uma Educação Superior de Qualidade: presente e futuro"
In this presentation I will suggest using a quality framework to help you think about and improve quality of e-learning. I start with some general observations about quality and the need for quality frameworks. I then discuss two specific frameworks: the well-established E-xcellence benchmarks for e-learning, and the OpenupEd framework which as been specifically aligned at MOOCs. Finally I return to some more practical advise, particularly about thinking about the learning design of a course at an early stage.
This webinar discussed research needs and priorities for three K-12 virtual schools: Michigan Virtual School, The Virtual High School, and North Carolina Virtual Public School. Key research topics included effective instructional strategies for online learning, student engagement, collaboration tools, blended learning models, and teacher evaluation processes for online instructors. Representatives from each virtual school provided details on their programs and outlined potential research partnerships and opportunities.
Quality in online, open and flexible education - a global perspectiveicdeslides
A presentation from International Council for Open and Distance Education - ICDE at the VI Cread Andes Convention and VI Virtual Educa Ecuador Conference in Ecuador, 29 May - 1 June 2018
Towards an institutional framework to effectively support transitions to blen...Vicki Dale
Presentation by Vicki Dale, Josephine Adekola and Kerr Gardiner, University of Glasgow, to the ALT-C conference, University of Warwick, 6-8 September 2016
The document discusses rethinking the distance education course development process at Fort Hays State University to improve quality. It notes changing competitive landscapes that require enhancing quality and differentiation. A new three-pathway process incorporates quality standards, is driven by needs, and increases efficient use of resources through phases and peer review. The goal is to improve competitive positioning by enhancing quality perceptions, retention, and student satisfaction. It also aims to build a community promoting best practices in online course design.
A presentation on 'MOOCs and Quality Issues' given at a workshop organised by the QA-QE special interest group of the UK Higher Education Academy (HEA) [http://qaqe-sig.net/?page_id=8]
How do you think naac is ensuring external and internal quality at higher edu...Abhishek Nayan
National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) was established by the UGC in September 1994 at Bangalore for evaluating the performance of the Universities and Colleges in the Country. NAAC's mandate includes the task of performance evaluation, assessment and accreditation of universities and colleges in the country. Since its eastablishment, NAAC is working towards quality enhancement in Higher education. Check the slides to know more.
ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION:REVISED PROCESS -AFFILIATED/CONSTITUENT COLLEGESAbhay Khandagle
The document discusses the revised process of assessment and accreditation for affiliated and constituent colleges by the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) effective from July 2017. It provides an overview of NAAC's vision, mission, core values, and the revised assessment framework. The framework focuses on data-based quantitative indicators for evaluation with increased objectivity and transparency. It introduces pre-qualifiers for peer team visits and system-generated scores. The assessment will be based on a Quality Indicator Framework across 7 criteria including curricular aspects, teaching-learning and evaluation, research, infrastructure, student support, governance and best practices.
The district began a credit recovery program using digital curriculum in 2010-2011 to increase access to courses for students needing to recover credits. The program uses a blended learning model where students work independently on an online curriculum with teacher support. It aims to provide equitable opportunities while increasing rigor and 21st century skills. Over 1,000 students have participated across multiple high schools, recovering over 5,000 credits since 2012-2013. Most students preferred the blended model and found it more motivating than traditional classes. Data shows the program is effective at helping students graduate compared to previous summer school options.
The district began a credit recovery program using digital curriculum in 2010-2011 to increase access to courses for students needing to recover credits. The program uses a blended learning model where students work independently on an online curriculum with teacher support. It aims to provide equitable opportunities while increasing rigor and 21st century skills. Over 1,000 students have participated across multiple high schools, recovering over 5,000 credits since 2012-2013. Most students preferred the blended model and found it more motivating than traditional classes. Data shows the program is effective at helping students graduate.
Leadership in eLearning: Developing the Next Generation of LeadersMark Brown
This document summarizes a presentation by Dr. Mark Brown and Dr. Kaye Shelton on developing leadership in eLearning. It introduces the speakers and their institutions. It then discusses the Quality Scorecard, a research-based evaluation instrument with 75 indicators across 9 categories to assess quality in online education. Example indicators are provided. The document notes that the Quality Scorecard can be used to engage stakeholders, identify improvement areas, and support accreditation. It is being adopted internationally and will soon be available in additional languages. The presentation addresses using the Online Learning Consortium's interactive version of the scorecard and takes questions.
Evaluating higher education learning outcomes presentation to cesCesToronto
The Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario (HEQCO) has a number of projects focused on defining and measuring learning outcomes working with Ontario's colleges and universities in partnership with international organisations. This presentation provides an overview of how learning outcomes are increasing being viewed as a means to evaluate higher education quality, and presents the challenges and successes of developing, demonstrating and assessing higher education learning outcomes in Ontario.
Similar to Policy issues in UK Higher Education 2015 (20)
Ways to ensure “buy in” from the academics in the transition to digitised ass...Marieke Guy
Ways to ensure “buy in” from the academics in the transition to digitised assessments
Marieke Guy (Head of Digital Assessment) & Claudia Cox (Digital Assessment Advisor)
Uniwise partner meeting
2nd November 2023
Assessing for a World Beyond AssessmentMarieke Guy
Marieke Guy from University College London discussed challenges with assessment and ways institutions are innovating. Assessment is a complex problem with many stakeholders. UCL is exploring new approaches like integrating artificial intelligence, offering students optionality in assessments, and designing authentic assessments that mirror real-world problems. This involves case studies of modules using videos, collaborative projects, and virtual simulations. UCL also aims to make assessment more relevant, innovative, enable technology, improve feedback, and foster student enjoyment of learning.
The blandness is its formulaic style’: insights to help understand the impact...Marieke Guy
This document announces a lunch and learn session on the impact of AI on assessments. It provides six small changes that can be made now to current assessments, such as discussing academic integrity with students and revising exam questions. Larger changes are presented in an assessment menu inspired by a card game. The session will discuss issues around ubiquitous AI tools enabling easy cheating, the purpose of assessment, and moving forward with generative AI. References are provided on related topics such as AI detecting cheating, a student using ChatGPT to cheat, and universities rejecting anti-plagiarism technology.
Redesigning assessments for a world with artificial intelligenceMarieke Guy
Redesigning assessments for a world with artificial intelligence presentation By Marieke Guy, Head of Digital Assessment, UCL
QAA Annual Conference, The Future of Quality: What’s Next?
Wednesday 13 September 2023
Closing remarks: Assessment with Phill DawsonMarieke Guy
Marieke Guy gave the closing remarks for the assessment conference at UCL. She highlighted several themes from the conference including cross-team, cross-institution, and cross-sector collaboration on digital assessment. Two talks focused on using feedback to improve student learning and preparing students for their future through valid assessments not tied to the past. The conference organizers and host King's College London were thanked for their work in bringing people together to discuss advancing assessment practices.
This document summarizes a presentation given by Simon Walker and Marieke Guy about the University College London's (UCL) journey towards digital transformation of assessment and feedback.
Some key points:
- UCL implemented a secure digital assessment platform called AUCL in response to the COVID-19 pandemic to deliver over 1,000 assessments remotely.
- Since then UCL has expanded usage of AUCL, with over 1,600 exams and 65,000 students using it in year two.
- Student and staff surveys showed mostly positive feedback but also areas for improvement like assessment weightings, duration, and content representation.
- UCL is piloting lockdown browsers, improving academic integrity, and partnering with
The document summarizes UCL's pilot of using a lockdown browser for digital assessments. It describes the rationale for using a lockdown browser, details four pilot programs conducted or planned at UCL involving different locations, devices and numbers of students, and key areas of interest being evaluated including device type, online management and invigilation, and student and staff perspectives. The goal is to assess the viability and scalability of using lockdown browsers to help ensure academic integrity for digital assessments conducted in-person.
Digital Assessment Team 2022 - a day in the life.pptxMarieke Guy
The Digital Assessment Team at UCL provides support for digital assessment across all faculties. The team consists of specialists in different subject areas as well as learning technologists. They provide training to staff and departments on UCL's digital assessment platform AssessmentUCL. Additionally, the team works on improvements to the platform, investigates new assessment tools, and supports the use of other tools like Turnitin and Moodle. The team's workload is consistent throughout the year with no downtime between project sprints and ongoing support requests.
This document discusses various approaches to assessment using AssessmentUCL. It describes using dynamic questions and variables in multiple choice assessments. It also discusses allocating different papers or versions to students, using videos for assessments, group activities, mock scenarios, and providing improved feedback including audio/video. Other approaches mentioned include industry case studies, portfolios, infographics, rethinking coursework, and online marking.
Designing alternative assessments requires analyzing how technology tools can help or hinder learning goals, getting student feedback on new approaches, and adapting processes based on data. Assessment should be integrated into course and program design from the start and linked to learning outcomes, and attending workshops or speaking with a Digital Assessment Advisor can provide support on effective strategies.
MCQs_ The joys of making your mind up.pdfMarieke Guy
Explore the benefits and challenges of using MCQs in both formative and summative assessment, and get practical guidance on designing good MCQs in AssessmentUCL.
4 March, 10.30am-11.30am. Online event.
Multiple choice questions have often had a bad rap in education, sometimes seen as assessing only lower level skills such as factual recall. However, with good question design this assessment approach can allow for testing of more complex cognitive processes. Add in the increasing sophistication of options offered by digital assessment platforms, which allow automatic grading and statistical analysis, and you can begin to significantly streamline your marking processes.
This workshop will explore the benefits and challenges of using MCQs in both formative and summative assessment and provide practical guidance on:
Constructing good MCQs
The range of MCQs available on digital platforms, focussing on AssessmentUCL.
There will be time for discussion and questions.
After attending this session, you will be able to:
Create worthwhile MCQs that test a range of learning outcomes.
Understand the range of MCQs available on digital platforms and how they can be used, focussing on AssessmentUCL.
Who should attend this session
All those engaged in teaching, assessment and the support of learning (academics, administrators, professional service colleagues).
Rubrics_ removing the glitch in the assessment matrix (1).pdfMarieke Guy
Rubrics bring together criteria, grades and feedback into a single scoring matrix. This session will explore how to design a good rubric and the benefits and potential challenges of using rubrics in assessments.
Would you like to increase reliability and consistency in marking, ensure alignment with intended learning outcomes and provide an efficient feedback mechanism for students? If so, this session on rubrics is for you.
Rubrics are a useful way of bringing together criteria, grades and feedback into a single scoring matrix to help streamline marking, provide transparency and support learners to understand how their performance will be judged.
This workshop will focus on the benefits and potential challenges of using rubrics in assessment within your subject area and provide practical guidance on:
How to design a good rubric
Creating and marking with rubrics in Assessment UCL
There will be opportunities for discussion and questions.
After attending this session, you will be able to:
Understand the benefits and potential challenges of using rubrics in assessment
Design an appropriate rubric for your assessments
Understand how to create and mark with rubrics in Assessment UCL
Who should attend this session
All those engaged in teaching, assessment and the support of learning (academics, administrators, professional service colleagues).
Making your mind up: Formalising the evaluation of learning technologies Marieke Guy
The document discusses the need for institutions to take a more formal approach to evaluating learning technologies. It introduces some existing evaluation frameworks like the Educause rubric and SECTIONS model. It then outlines UCEM's approach, which involved thoroughly investigating requirements, identifying systems to evaluate, developing a testing plan based on the Educause rubric, testing functionality and data flows, and involving stakeholders before selecting a new assessment platform. Attendees at the talk were asked to provide ideas on evaluation processes and challenges through a Mural board.
The document describes several video assessment techniques that can be used for students:
1. Students record or upload a video presentation on a topic and receive automatic feedback to improve their presentation skills.
2. Students upload a video demonstrating a skill and receive feedback to enhance their competency.
3. In a virtual classroom, students collaborate to record a group presentation and provide peer assessment on each other's contributions.
4. Students record video responses to pre-recorded questions to practice interview techniques through a standardized question/answer approach.
This document discusses alternative assessment methods and provides rationales and ideas for various approaches. It proposes using video assessments to allow students to practice real-world skills, eportfolios to enable continuous assessment and reflection, and industry case studies/scenarios to provide authentic assessments aligned with industry. Other suggestions include mini-quizzes for varied engagement and assessment, and balancing new approaches with resources. The goal is to better prepare students through assessment practices that mimic the real world.
The Transnational Online Pivot: A Case Study Exploring Online Delivery in ChinaMarieke Guy
This document summarizes a case study exploring the transition to online delivery of teaching content in China due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Academics from the Royal Agricultural University normally travel to China to teach students in-person, but had to shift to delivering pre-recorded lectures and holding interactive Zoom sessions. While online teaching can overcome geographical barriers, it also presents challenges like language differences and student engagement. Feedback from students indicated interactive sessions worked best when broken into shorter segments. Academics found recording lectures technically straightforward but time-consuming and felt isolated from students. Mixed methods were argued to provide multiple views for understanding the student experience in this transnational online environment.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdfTechSoup
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Policy issues in UK Higher Education 2015
1. Outline the current policy issues
regarding UK higher education
and the potential impact these
may have on the role of QAA
Marieke Guy
@mariekeguy
QAA Interview
Tuesday 28th July 2015
2. Value for money for students
investing in their education,
and for taxpayers
underwriting the system
3. Value for money:
• HE is now in a transformed financial situation
due to fees
• Students demanding increased value for money
• Students want more information on fee spending
• Closer assessment of employment and earnings
returns to education
• Measurement of ‘learning gain’ & ‘job ready’
• Requirement for better/more KIS data
• Reflection on graduate earnings premium
5. Teaching:
• Required rebalancing of teaching and research
• Teaching Excellence Framework proposed
• Will provide students with the information they
need to judge teaching quality
• Will include data from institutional inspections
• Will involve output-focused criteria and metrics
• Will look at degree classification (TEF green
paper) and Grade point average (GPA)
• Relevancy of course and improved course design
7. Student numbers:
• Removal of student number controls for
undergraduates
• Commitment to widening participation and social
mobility
• Office for Fair Access (OFFA) report - 183
universities and colleges had submitted access
agreements
• Scrapping of maintenance grants for students – now
repayable loans for those from families with low
incomes
• International student numbers as part of wider
issue of immigration in public discourse
9. Expansion and Competition:
• Increase of alternate providers who are regulated
separately
• Want high quality market entry whilst ensure
regulatory regime that guards against poor quality
provision
• Still need to be tested against baseline
requirements
• Idea of accreditation ‘kite marks’ for providers who
wish to operate internationally
• Globalisation of UK HE – partnerships with countries
with different accreditation systems - Transnational
Education (TNE)
11. Internet based-provision:
• Recognising potential of online, distance and
blended-learning
• MOOCs, Open Education, open assessment
• Rise in more mature, part-time and long-
distance learners
• Employers require new skills and different
qualifications
• Possibly more employer co-financed, co-
designed and co-delivered masters and doctoral
programmes
12. Future of the
QAA ??
Risk-based approach to
QA that would take the
maturity and track
record of providers
into account.
Common yet flexible
framework -
bureaucratic burdens
kept to a minimum,
institutional autonomy
respected.
International reputation, respect within sector
13. Implications for QAA:
• Value for money: Find pressure points to raise standards, talk to
students even more, clearer idea of ‘learning gain', encouraging
HE bodies use of student outcomes data, international lessons,
improved transparency
• Teaching: Teaching Excellence Framework - lessons from REF
(un-gamable, cheap), closer eye on content of courses, look at
honours system, external examiner system, grades, innovation?
• Student numbers: Monitoring of increase of numbers, output
driven approach
• Expansion: Gateway work with new providers, accreditation
‘kite marks’ for providers who wish to operate internationally,
educational oversight work, continue educational oversight work
• Internet-based provision: Adapting assessment, consideration
of MOOCs, updating of Quality Code and Subject Benchmark
Statements
14. Taking it forward: Data in QA:
Keep in mind
the
importance of
‘measuring
what matters’
There is a growing
emphasis on
responsible metrics
(rather than just
peer assessment)
(metric tide)
QA system
needs to make
use of existing
data and
information
Data-informed
decision-making
to sit alongside
transparency
The
‘one
size fits
all’ of
QA no
longer
works
Data
visualisation and
data story telling
approaches
HEIDI, HESA
(Unistats), UCAS,
OECD, ONS etc.