2. During an inspection of a project deliverable, the team detects the same defect in the deliverable
that has already been identified during a previous inspection. The project manager is confused
about how this could have happened since a change request was approved to repair the defect.
After discussing the issue with the team, the project manager learns that the team never
implemented the approved change request.
What could have helped prevent this situation?
A. Holding an approved change requests review
B. Conducting a retrospective meeting
C. Performing a root cause analysis
D. Creating a quality report
HINT: What can be done to ensure that all approved change requests were implemented as
specified?
Question
3. The correct answer is A.
Inspections carried out as part of the Control Quality process may uncover defects or areas of
noncompliance with project requirements, which, in turn, may generate change requests. It is
the responsibility of the project team to ensure that those approved change requests are
implemented and properly tested, completed, and certified.
In this scenario, the project manager learns that an approved change request was never
implemented. Retrospectives, root cause analysis, and quality reports would not have prevented
this issue but could be used to help the team avoid such a mistake in the future. An approved
change request review would have provided the project manager and the team a mechanism for
verifying that the approved change request was implemented and is, therefore, the best answer
to the question asked.
Answer
4. All our questions are updated to the latest
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge
(PMBOK® Guide) standard.
Stop by at free.pm-exam-simulator.com/ and try the
PM Exam Simulator free for 7 days.
We are a trusted and experienced education provider.