SlideShare a Scribd company logo
The Case of the FDA and Plan B The Politics of Drug Regulation and the Implications for Consumer Welfare
Plan B: Emergency Contraception Contraception after intercourse Levonorgestrel 0.75 mg x 2 (12 hrs) or 1.5 mg x1 “Plan B” approved by FDA in 1999 as a prescription Has fewer side effects than combo estrogen progestin pills
How long after? FDA: within 72 hours Advocates: within 120 hours, but more effective with earlier administration, so take as soon as possible
FDA Criteria for OTC Status Acceptable safety profile based on prescription use and experience Low potential to be abused Appropriate safety and therapeutic index Positive benefit-risk assessment Needed for a condition or illness that is self-recognizable, self-limiting, and requires minimal intervention by a health care practitioner for treatment
Did Plan B Meet these Criteria? Safety Side effects with Plan B include nausea, abdominal pain, fatigue, headache, menstrual changes, dizziness, breast tenderness, vomiting, and diarrhea. Menstrual bleeding may be heavier or lighter, earlier or later, after taking Plan B.  Benefit/risk assessment – generally high with some disagreement
Perfect use and typical use pregnancy rate - EC Perfect use Excludes anyone with intercourse after EC use, not completing dose, etc. (Anyone not following directions excluded) Typical Use All users, all kinds of use
Randomized trials of EC Nearly all reported studies are randomized clinical trials, but… Unethical to randomize women to placebo Comparison has been another regimen of EC Most often estrogen/progestin regimen
Perfect use and typical use pregnancy rates -EC World Health Organization 1998 Study (n=997) Randomized trial of estrogen/progesterin vs. Plan B
WHO 1998
The Politics: How does EC work? Before fertilization? Prevent ovulation Prevent sperm migration After fertilization? Prevent implantation
Abbreviated time line for Plan B	 July 1999: Women’s Capital Corporation's application for Plan B to be a prescription drug is approved February 2001: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists issues a statement in support of Plan B OTC status. More than 70 medical, public health and other organizations file a citizens’ petition asking the FDA to grant Plan B OTC status April 2002: WCC’s request approval to do two pediatric studies on the use of Plan B denied by FDA (wanted to see how adolescents would use the drug) April 2003: WCC applies for OTC status
Time Line Continued May 2003: FDA Commissioner Mark McClelland discusses Plan B application with White House officials December 2003: 44 members of Congress send letter t0 the FDA urging it to reject WCC’s application for OTC status for Plan B
FDA Hearing: December 2003 Advisory committee for reproductive health drugs: 11 members Advisory committee for OTC drugs: 13 members Special consultants: 4 persons Mix of science, theater, and politics End of day: vote 23 approve, 4 against move to OTC status, 1 extension  Vote 27-1 that Plan B can be safely used – even by adolescents – as recommended by the label
Dissenting Votes Stanford: Overestimated effectiveness information and inadequate information for informed consent of post fertilization effects Hager: Insufficient information regarding OTC safety for adolescents Crockett: Should remain prescription for physician counseling for contraception Cantilena (Chair): Label comprehension studies inadequate
Abbreviated time line for Plan B January 2004: FDA Commissioner’s Office recommends that the Office of Drug Evaluation NOT approve OTC sale January 2004: Office of Drug Evaluation concludes Plan B is safe for OTC sales January 2004: 76 members of Congress send letter to Commissioner McClelland expressing support for the panel’s decision and recommending OTC status
February 2004: Office of Drug Evaluation staff ask for more data on Plan B and adolescents. But also recommends Plan B for unrestricted OTC sale May 2004: Against internal advice of staff, the FDA director of CDER denies OTC status, citing (only) concerns about safety of use in adolescents Investigations begin of decision being for political reasons July 2004: Company applies for OTC status for women age 16 and older (if adolescents are issue) January 2005: The FDA fails to issue a decision on the Plan B application within the previously scheduled time. The Center for Reproductive Rights files a lawsuit against FDA on behalf of reproductive health groups and activists for its continued failure to grant Plan B OTC status. Suit claims that the FDA broke its own rules and regulations by ignoring science and holding Plan B to a different standard than other OTC drugs
January 2005: JAMA publishes study that shows increased access to EC does not lead to increased pregnancy rates, increase in unprotected sex, or cause women to give up regular birth control July 2005: Senators Patty Murray and Hilary Clinton allow the nomination of Lester Crawford as FDA Commissioner to proceed with promise from HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt that Plan B decision will be made by September 1 August 2005: FDA announces it will not make a decision but will wait for 60-day comment period with no specified deadline August 2005: Susan Wood, Director of FDA Office of Women’s Health, resigns September 2005: Lester Crawford resigns
Fall 2005: Andrew von Eschenbach nominated for FDA Commissioner; nomination placed on hold by Senators Patty Murray and Hilary Clinton until FDA acts on Plan B OTC application August 24, 2006: An FDA memo from acting FDA Commissioner Dr. von Eschenbach approves the application of Plan B for OTC status for women age 18 and over – the day before the Senate confirmation hearings Commissioner von Exchenbach approved by senate
Conditions for marketing Plan B	 Only sold in facilities that can sell prescription drugs Sold from behind the counter OTC upon ID proof of 18 and over Company will Engage in educational campaigns for health professionals and public Do annual survey of health professionals Use existing data sources to monitor pregnancy rates, abortion rates, STI rates Monitor point of purchase with anonymous shoppers
GAO Report: Unusual Aspects of FDA’s Review Process FDA’s high level management was more involved in review of Plan B than in those of other OTC switch applications Conflicting accounts within the FDA about whether the decision to not approve was made before the reviews were complete Rationale for the acting director’s decision was novel – never before had behavioral implications due to cognitive differences by age been considered
Implications for Consumer Welfare? When does life begin? What are women’s reproductive rights? Are young girls capable of making their own reproductive decisions?
Reviewing… Plan B Science regarding effectiveness and safety quite clear Science regarding how it works not so clear FDA’s authority to approve drugs for OTC sale Case of Plan B, politics of reproductive rights overshadowed the science of how effective it was

More Related Content

What's hot

Orphan Drugs
Orphan DrugsOrphan Drugs
Orphan Drugs
patrickconneran
 
FindLaw - Contraception Lawsuit Ruling
FindLaw - Contraception Lawsuit RulingFindLaw - Contraception Lawsuit Ruling
FindLaw - Contraception Lawsuit Ruling
LegalDocs
 
Orphan drugs
Orphan drugsOrphan drugs
Orphan drugs
Sumaiya Banu
 
The Orphan Drug Act
The Orphan Drug ActThe Orphan Drug Act
The Orphan Drug Act
biotechpro
 
Key Issues in FDA & FTC Regulation of Dietary Supplements
Key Issues in FDA & FTC Regulation of Dietary SupplementsKey Issues in FDA & FTC Regulation of Dietary Supplements
Key Issues in FDA & FTC Regulation of Dietary Supplements
Michael Swit
 
NEW POWER POINT PRESENTATION ON ORPHAN DISEASES AND DRUGS
NEW POWER POINT PRESENTATION ON ORPHAN DISEASES AND DRUGSNEW POWER POINT PRESENTATION ON ORPHAN DISEASES AND DRUGS
NEW POWER POINT PRESENTATION ON ORPHAN DISEASES AND DRUGS
Manukonda sravani Reddy
 
Rx15 workshop mon_200_aleshire_dowell_no_notes
Rx15 workshop mon_200_aleshire_dowell_no_notesRx15 workshop mon_200_aleshire_dowell_no_notes
Rx15 workshop mon_200_aleshire_dowell_no_notes
OPUNITE
 
Rx15 presummit mon_200_1_towers_2davis_3bada
Rx15 presummit mon_200_1_towers_2davis_3badaRx15 presummit mon_200_1_towers_2davis_3bada
Rx15 presummit mon_200_1_towers_2davis_3bada
OPUNITE
 
Maureen smith patient submissionspresentation.m smith.nov2015
Maureen smith patient submissionspresentation.m smith.nov2015Maureen smith patient submissionspresentation.m smith.nov2015
Maureen smith patient submissionspresentation.m smith.nov2015
Canadian Organization for Rare Disorders
 
Len 7 rannazzisi
Len 7 rannazzisiLen 7 rannazzisi
Len 7 rannazzisi
OPUNITE
 
Dayton - opiate prescription abuse in utah
Dayton - opiate prescription abuse in utahDayton - opiate prescription abuse in utah
Dayton - opiate prescription abuse in utah
John Dayton, MD, FACEP, FAAEM
 
Phil Walls
Phil WallsPhil Walls
Phil Walls
OPUNITE
 
2012 How did Rx abuse become a National Epidemic in the US
2012 How did Rx abuse become a National Epidemic in the US2012 How did Rx abuse become a National Epidemic in the US
2012 How did Rx abuse become a National Epidemic in the US
Teresa Miller
 
Data Speaks; What We Missed
Data Speaks; What We MissedData Speaks; What We Missed
Data Speaks; What We Missed
Obaid Ali / Roohi B. Obaid
 
Rx16 clinical wed_1230_1_shanehsaz_2waller
Rx16 clinical wed_1230_1_shanehsaz_2wallerRx16 clinical wed_1230_1_shanehsaz_2waller
Rx16 clinical wed_1230_1_shanehsaz_2waller
OPUNITE
 
Tpp 3 joint presentation
Tpp 3 joint presentationTpp 3 joint presentation
Tpp 3 joint presentation
OPUNITE
 
Cam massumi.mehrdad.michael iaapdc_2017_06_08
Cam massumi.mehrdad.michael iaapdc_2017_06_08Cam massumi.mehrdad.michael iaapdc_2017_06_08
Cam massumi.mehrdad.michael iaapdc_2017_06_08
Mehrdad Michael Massumi
 
STREAM TWO: Lucas Kempf, Drug development in Rare Diseases at FDA
STREAM TWO: Lucas Kempf, Drug development in Rare Diseases at FDASTREAM TWO: Lucas Kempf, Drug development in Rare Diseases at FDA
STREAM TWO: Lucas Kempf, Drug development in Rare Diseases at FDA
Canadian Organization for Rare Disorders
 
Prescription Drug Abuse, Robert Rich, MD - SLC 2015
Prescription Drug Abuse, Robert Rich, MD - SLC 2015Prescription Drug Abuse, Robert Rich, MD - SLC 2015
Prescription Drug Abuse, Robert Rich, MD - SLC 2015
American Academy of Family Physicians
 
Drug Access Navigation - An Insider's Perspective
Drug Access Navigation - An Insider's PerspectiveDrug Access Navigation - An Insider's Perspective
Drug Access Navigation - An Insider's Perspective
Canadian Cancer Survivor Network
 

What's hot (20)

Orphan Drugs
Orphan DrugsOrphan Drugs
Orphan Drugs
 
FindLaw - Contraception Lawsuit Ruling
FindLaw - Contraception Lawsuit RulingFindLaw - Contraception Lawsuit Ruling
FindLaw - Contraception Lawsuit Ruling
 
Orphan drugs
Orphan drugsOrphan drugs
Orphan drugs
 
The Orphan Drug Act
The Orphan Drug ActThe Orphan Drug Act
The Orphan Drug Act
 
Key Issues in FDA & FTC Regulation of Dietary Supplements
Key Issues in FDA & FTC Regulation of Dietary SupplementsKey Issues in FDA & FTC Regulation of Dietary Supplements
Key Issues in FDA & FTC Regulation of Dietary Supplements
 
NEW POWER POINT PRESENTATION ON ORPHAN DISEASES AND DRUGS
NEW POWER POINT PRESENTATION ON ORPHAN DISEASES AND DRUGSNEW POWER POINT PRESENTATION ON ORPHAN DISEASES AND DRUGS
NEW POWER POINT PRESENTATION ON ORPHAN DISEASES AND DRUGS
 
Rx15 workshop mon_200_aleshire_dowell_no_notes
Rx15 workshop mon_200_aleshire_dowell_no_notesRx15 workshop mon_200_aleshire_dowell_no_notes
Rx15 workshop mon_200_aleshire_dowell_no_notes
 
Rx15 presummit mon_200_1_towers_2davis_3bada
Rx15 presummit mon_200_1_towers_2davis_3badaRx15 presummit mon_200_1_towers_2davis_3bada
Rx15 presummit mon_200_1_towers_2davis_3bada
 
Maureen smith patient submissionspresentation.m smith.nov2015
Maureen smith patient submissionspresentation.m smith.nov2015Maureen smith patient submissionspresentation.m smith.nov2015
Maureen smith patient submissionspresentation.m smith.nov2015
 
Len 7 rannazzisi
Len 7 rannazzisiLen 7 rannazzisi
Len 7 rannazzisi
 
Dayton - opiate prescription abuse in utah
Dayton - opiate prescription abuse in utahDayton - opiate prescription abuse in utah
Dayton - opiate prescription abuse in utah
 
Phil Walls
Phil WallsPhil Walls
Phil Walls
 
2012 How did Rx abuse become a National Epidemic in the US
2012 How did Rx abuse become a National Epidemic in the US2012 How did Rx abuse become a National Epidemic in the US
2012 How did Rx abuse become a National Epidemic in the US
 
Data Speaks; What We Missed
Data Speaks; What We MissedData Speaks; What We Missed
Data Speaks; What We Missed
 
Rx16 clinical wed_1230_1_shanehsaz_2waller
Rx16 clinical wed_1230_1_shanehsaz_2wallerRx16 clinical wed_1230_1_shanehsaz_2waller
Rx16 clinical wed_1230_1_shanehsaz_2waller
 
Tpp 3 joint presentation
Tpp 3 joint presentationTpp 3 joint presentation
Tpp 3 joint presentation
 
Cam massumi.mehrdad.michael iaapdc_2017_06_08
Cam massumi.mehrdad.michael iaapdc_2017_06_08Cam massumi.mehrdad.michael iaapdc_2017_06_08
Cam massumi.mehrdad.michael iaapdc_2017_06_08
 
STREAM TWO: Lucas Kempf, Drug development in Rare Diseases at FDA
STREAM TWO: Lucas Kempf, Drug development in Rare Diseases at FDASTREAM TWO: Lucas Kempf, Drug development in Rare Diseases at FDA
STREAM TWO: Lucas Kempf, Drug development in Rare Diseases at FDA
 
Prescription Drug Abuse, Robert Rich, MD - SLC 2015
Prescription Drug Abuse, Robert Rich, MD - SLC 2015Prescription Drug Abuse, Robert Rich, MD - SLC 2015
Prescription Drug Abuse, Robert Rich, MD - SLC 2015
 
Drug Access Navigation - An Insider's Perspective
Drug Access Navigation - An Insider's PerspectiveDrug Access Navigation - An Insider's Perspective
Drug Access Navigation - An Insider's Perspective
 

Similar to Plan b

Inside the FDA
Inside the FDAInside the FDA
Inside the FDA
Business Book Summaries
 
Chapter 19Clinical Trials Clinical TrialsThe history
Chapter 19Clinical Trials Clinical TrialsThe history Chapter 19Clinical Trials Clinical TrialsThe history
Chapter 19Clinical Trials Clinical TrialsThe history
EstelaJeffery653
 
Medial Ethics & Right to Try Webinar
Medial Ethics & Right to Try WebinarMedial Ethics & Right to Try Webinar
Medial Ethics & Right to Try Webinar
Fight Colorectal Cancer
 
CHB-pub-PolicyReport66
CHB-pub-PolicyReport66CHB-pub-PolicyReport66
CHB-pub-PolicyReport66
Michelle Rubin
 
Historical aspects of drug approval process
Historical aspects of drug approval processHistorical aspects of drug approval process
Historical aspects of drug approval process
paresh bharodiya
 
Women's Health, Emergency Contraception and the FDA
Women's Health, Emergency Contraception and the FDAWomen's Health, Emergency Contraception and the FDA
Women's Health, Emergency Contraception and the FDA
The Bixby Center on Population and Reproductive Health
 
Schedule Y by akshdeep sharma
Schedule Y by akshdeep sharmaSchedule Y by akshdeep sharma
Schedule Y by akshdeep sharma
Akshdeep Sharma
 
History of Drug Aproval
History of Drug AprovalHistory of Drug Aproval
History of Drug Aproval
dbwalton
 
Birth Control Pills & The Pharmacy2
Birth Control Pills & The Pharmacy2Birth Control Pills & The Pharmacy2
Birth Control Pills & The Pharmacy2
guest8005eb
 
Birth Control Pills & The Pharmacy2
Birth Control Pills & The Pharmacy2Birth Control Pills & The Pharmacy2
Birth Control Pills & The Pharmacy2
guest8005eb
 
Dr. Mollyann Brodie: "What Soaring Drug Prices Mean for Patients," 9.3.15
Dr. Mollyann Brodie: "What Soaring Drug Prices Mean for Patients," 9.3.15Dr. Mollyann Brodie: "What Soaring Drug Prices Mean for Patients," 9.3.15
Dr. Mollyann Brodie: "What Soaring Drug Prices Mean for Patients," 9.3.15
reportingonhealth
 
Overview of US FDA: Drugs
Overview of US FDA: DrugsOverview of US FDA: Drugs
Overview of US FDA: Drugs
Gaurav Andhansare
 
Special Challenges in Clinical Trials: Case Study: the Dying child and the ...
Special Challenges in Clinical Trials:  Case Study:  the Dying child and the ...Special Challenges in Clinical Trials:  Case Study:  the Dying child and the ...
Special Challenges in Clinical Trials: Case Study: the Dying child and the ...
Michael Swit
 
Drug development life cycle indepth overview.pptx
Drug development life cycle indepth overview.pptxDrug development life cycle indepth overview.pptx
Drug development life cycle indepth overview.pptx
MohammadAbuzar19
 
Presentation: The Australian and International landscape - keynote forum
Presentation: The Australian and International landscape - keynote forumPresentation: The Australian and International landscape - keynote forum
Presentation: The Australian and International landscape - keynote forum
TGA Australia
 
Christine Mitchell, "Expanded Access and Right to Try Laws"
Christine Mitchell, "Expanded Access and Right to Try Laws"Christine Mitchell, "Expanded Access and Right to Try Laws"
Christine Mitchell, "Expanded Access and Right to Try Laws"
The Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics
 
Institution newsletter Volume 2 Issue 2
Institution newsletter   Volume 2 Issue 2Institution newsletter   Volume 2 Issue 2
Institution newsletter Volume 2 Issue 2
Quorum Review - Independent Review Board
 
Chapter 3
Chapter 3Chapter 3
Chapter 3
Michelle Meyer
 
Lecture one, units 1 2 pharm
Lecture one, units 1 2 pharmLecture one, units 1 2 pharm
Lecture one, units 1 2 pharm
University of Miami
 
Us orphan drug market outlook 2018
Us orphan drug market outlook 2018Us orphan drug market outlook 2018
Us orphan drug market outlook 2018
Rajesh Sarma
 

Similar to Plan b (20)

Inside the FDA
Inside the FDAInside the FDA
Inside the FDA
 
Chapter 19Clinical Trials Clinical TrialsThe history
Chapter 19Clinical Trials Clinical TrialsThe history Chapter 19Clinical Trials Clinical TrialsThe history
Chapter 19Clinical Trials Clinical TrialsThe history
 
Medial Ethics & Right to Try Webinar
Medial Ethics & Right to Try WebinarMedial Ethics & Right to Try Webinar
Medial Ethics & Right to Try Webinar
 
CHB-pub-PolicyReport66
CHB-pub-PolicyReport66CHB-pub-PolicyReport66
CHB-pub-PolicyReport66
 
Historical aspects of drug approval process
Historical aspects of drug approval processHistorical aspects of drug approval process
Historical aspects of drug approval process
 
Women's Health, Emergency Contraception and the FDA
Women's Health, Emergency Contraception and the FDAWomen's Health, Emergency Contraception and the FDA
Women's Health, Emergency Contraception and the FDA
 
Schedule Y by akshdeep sharma
Schedule Y by akshdeep sharmaSchedule Y by akshdeep sharma
Schedule Y by akshdeep sharma
 
History of Drug Aproval
History of Drug AprovalHistory of Drug Aproval
History of Drug Aproval
 
Birth Control Pills & The Pharmacy2
Birth Control Pills & The Pharmacy2Birth Control Pills & The Pharmacy2
Birth Control Pills & The Pharmacy2
 
Birth Control Pills & The Pharmacy2
Birth Control Pills & The Pharmacy2Birth Control Pills & The Pharmacy2
Birth Control Pills & The Pharmacy2
 
Dr. Mollyann Brodie: "What Soaring Drug Prices Mean for Patients," 9.3.15
Dr. Mollyann Brodie: "What Soaring Drug Prices Mean for Patients," 9.3.15Dr. Mollyann Brodie: "What Soaring Drug Prices Mean for Patients," 9.3.15
Dr. Mollyann Brodie: "What Soaring Drug Prices Mean for Patients," 9.3.15
 
Overview of US FDA: Drugs
Overview of US FDA: DrugsOverview of US FDA: Drugs
Overview of US FDA: Drugs
 
Special Challenges in Clinical Trials: Case Study: the Dying child and the ...
Special Challenges in Clinical Trials:  Case Study:  the Dying child and the ...Special Challenges in Clinical Trials:  Case Study:  the Dying child and the ...
Special Challenges in Clinical Trials: Case Study: the Dying child and the ...
 
Drug development life cycle indepth overview.pptx
Drug development life cycle indepth overview.pptxDrug development life cycle indepth overview.pptx
Drug development life cycle indepth overview.pptx
 
Presentation: The Australian and International landscape - keynote forum
Presentation: The Australian and International landscape - keynote forumPresentation: The Australian and International landscape - keynote forum
Presentation: The Australian and International landscape - keynote forum
 
Christine Mitchell, "Expanded Access and Right to Try Laws"
Christine Mitchell, "Expanded Access and Right to Try Laws"Christine Mitchell, "Expanded Access and Right to Try Laws"
Christine Mitchell, "Expanded Access and Right to Try Laws"
 
Institution newsletter Volume 2 Issue 2
Institution newsletter   Volume 2 Issue 2Institution newsletter   Volume 2 Issue 2
Institution newsletter Volume 2 Issue 2
 
Chapter 3
Chapter 3Chapter 3
Chapter 3
 
Lecture one, units 1 2 pharm
Lecture one, units 1 2 pharmLecture one, units 1 2 pharm
Lecture one, units 1 2 pharm
 
Us orphan drug market outlook 2018
Us orphan drug market outlook 2018Us orphan drug market outlook 2018
Us orphan drug market outlook 2018
 

More from jarmanjo

Local food environments
Local food environmentsLocal food environments
Local food environments
jarmanjo
 
Community design and physical activity
Community design and physical activityCommunity design and physical activity
Community design and physical activity
jarmanjo
 
Neighborhood design and obesity
Neighborhood design and obesityNeighborhood design and obesity
Neighborhood design and obesity
jarmanjo
 
Fluoride presentation
Fluoride presentationFluoride presentation
Fluoride presentation
jarmanjo
 
Community health lecture
Community health lectureCommunity health lecture
Community health lecture
jarmanjo
 
Parental rights
Parental rightsParental rights
Parental rights
jarmanjo
 
Newborn screening 1
Newborn screening 1Newborn screening 1
Newborn screening 1
jarmanjo
 
Genetic testing
Genetic testingGenetic testing
Genetic testing
jarmanjo
 
Dietary supplements
Dietary supplementsDietary supplements
Dietary supplements
jarmanjo
 
Tobacco 2
Tobacco 2Tobacco 2
Tobacco 2
jarmanjo
 
Tobacco and youth
Tobacco and youthTobacco and youth
Tobacco and youth
jarmanjo
 
Tobacco 1
Tobacco 1Tobacco 1
Tobacco 1
jarmanjo
 

More from jarmanjo (12)

Local food environments
Local food environmentsLocal food environments
Local food environments
 
Community design and physical activity
Community design and physical activityCommunity design and physical activity
Community design and physical activity
 
Neighborhood design and obesity
Neighborhood design and obesityNeighborhood design and obesity
Neighborhood design and obesity
 
Fluoride presentation
Fluoride presentationFluoride presentation
Fluoride presentation
 
Community health lecture
Community health lectureCommunity health lecture
Community health lecture
 
Parental rights
Parental rightsParental rights
Parental rights
 
Newborn screening 1
Newborn screening 1Newborn screening 1
Newborn screening 1
 
Genetic testing
Genetic testingGenetic testing
Genetic testing
 
Dietary supplements
Dietary supplementsDietary supplements
Dietary supplements
 
Tobacco 2
Tobacco 2Tobacco 2
Tobacco 2
 
Tobacco and youth
Tobacco and youthTobacco and youth
Tobacco and youth
 
Tobacco 1
Tobacco 1Tobacco 1
Tobacco 1
 

Plan b

  • 1. The Case of the FDA and Plan B The Politics of Drug Regulation and the Implications for Consumer Welfare
  • 2. Plan B: Emergency Contraception Contraception after intercourse Levonorgestrel 0.75 mg x 2 (12 hrs) or 1.5 mg x1 “Plan B” approved by FDA in 1999 as a prescription Has fewer side effects than combo estrogen progestin pills
  • 3. How long after? FDA: within 72 hours Advocates: within 120 hours, but more effective with earlier administration, so take as soon as possible
  • 4. FDA Criteria for OTC Status Acceptable safety profile based on prescription use and experience Low potential to be abused Appropriate safety and therapeutic index Positive benefit-risk assessment Needed for a condition or illness that is self-recognizable, self-limiting, and requires minimal intervention by a health care practitioner for treatment
  • 5. Did Plan B Meet these Criteria? Safety Side effects with Plan B include nausea, abdominal pain, fatigue, headache, menstrual changes, dizziness, breast tenderness, vomiting, and diarrhea. Menstrual bleeding may be heavier or lighter, earlier or later, after taking Plan B. Benefit/risk assessment – generally high with some disagreement
  • 6. Perfect use and typical use pregnancy rate - EC Perfect use Excludes anyone with intercourse after EC use, not completing dose, etc. (Anyone not following directions excluded) Typical Use All users, all kinds of use
  • 7. Randomized trials of EC Nearly all reported studies are randomized clinical trials, but… Unethical to randomize women to placebo Comparison has been another regimen of EC Most often estrogen/progestin regimen
  • 8. Perfect use and typical use pregnancy rates -EC World Health Organization 1998 Study (n=997) Randomized trial of estrogen/progesterin vs. Plan B
  • 10. The Politics: How does EC work? Before fertilization? Prevent ovulation Prevent sperm migration After fertilization? Prevent implantation
  • 11. Abbreviated time line for Plan B July 1999: Women’s Capital Corporation's application for Plan B to be a prescription drug is approved February 2001: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists issues a statement in support of Plan B OTC status. More than 70 medical, public health and other organizations file a citizens’ petition asking the FDA to grant Plan B OTC status April 2002: WCC’s request approval to do two pediatric studies on the use of Plan B denied by FDA (wanted to see how adolescents would use the drug) April 2003: WCC applies for OTC status
  • 12. Time Line Continued May 2003: FDA Commissioner Mark McClelland discusses Plan B application with White House officials December 2003: 44 members of Congress send letter t0 the FDA urging it to reject WCC’s application for OTC status for Plan B
  • 13. FDA Hearing: December 2003 Advisory committee for reproductive health drugs: 11 members Advisory committee for OTC drugs: 13 members Special consultants: 4 persons Mix of science, theater, and politics End of day: vote 23 approve, 4 against move to OTC status, 1 extension Vote 27-1 that Plan B can be safely used – even by adolescents – as recommended by the label
  • 14. Dissenting Votes Stanford: Overestimated effectiveness information and inadequate information for informed consent of post fertilization effects Hager: Insufficient information regarding OTC safety for adolescents Crockett: Should remain prescription for physician counseling for contraception Cantilena (Chair): Label comprehension studies inadequate
  • 15. Abbreviated time line for Plan B January 2004: FDA Commissioner’s Office recommends that the Office of Drug Evaluation NOT approve OTC sale January 2004: Office of Drug Evaluation concludes Plan B is safe for OTC sales January 2004: 76 members of Congress send letter to Commissioner McClelland expressing support for the panel’s decision and recommending OTC status
  • 16. February 2004: Office of Drug Evaluation staff ask for more data on Plan B and adolescents. But also recommends Plan B for unrestricted OTC sale May 2004: Against internal advice of staff, the FDA director of CDER denies OTC status, citing (only) concerns about safety of use in adolescents Investigations begin of decision being for political reasons July 2004: Company applies for OTC status for women age 16 and older (if adolescents are issue) January 2005: The FDA fails to issue a decision on the Plan B application within the previously scheduled time. The Center for Reproductive Rights files a lawsuit against FDA on behalf of reproductive health groups and activists for its continued failure to grant Plan B OTC status. Suit claims that the FDA broke its own rules and regulations by ignoring science and holding Plan B to a different standard than other OTC drugs
  • 17. January 2005: JAMA publishes study that shows increased access to EC does not lead to increased pregnancy rates, increase in unprotected sex, or cause women to give up regular birth control July 2005: Senators Patty Murray and Hilary Clinton allow the nomination of Lester Crawford as FDA Commissioner to proceed with promise from HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt that Plan B decision will be made by September 1 August 2005: FDA announces it will not make a decision but will wait for 60-day comment period with no specified deadline August 2005: Susan Wood, Director of FDA Office of Women’s Health, resigns September 2005: Lester Crawford resigns
  • 18. Fall 2005: Andrew von Eschenbach nominated for FDA Commissioner; nomination placed on hold by Senators Patty Murray and Hilary Clinton until FDA acts on Plan B OTC application August 24, 2006: An FDA memo from acting FDA Commissioner Dr. von Eschenbach approves the application of Plan B for OTC status for women age 18 and over – the day before the Senate confirmation hearings Commissioner von Exchenbach approved by senate
  • 19. Conditions for marketing Plan B Only sold in facilities that can sell prescription drugs Sold from behind the counter OTC upon ID proof of 18 and over Company will Engage in educational campaigns for health professionals and public Do annual survey of health professionals Use existing data sources to monitor pregnancy rates, abortion rates, STI rates Monitor point of purchase with anonymous shoppers
  • 20. GAO Report: Unusual Aspects of FDA’s Review Process FDA’s high level management was more involved in review of Plan B than in those of other OTC switch applications Conflicting accounts within the FDA about whether the decision to not approve was made before the reviews were complete Rationale for the acting director’s decision was novel – never before had behavioral implications due to cognitive differences by age been considered
  • 21. Implications for Consumer Welfare? When does life begin? What are women’s reproductive rights? Are young girls capable of making their own reproductive decisions?
  • 22. Reviewing… Plan B Science regarding effectiveness and safety quite clear Science regarding how it works not so clear FDA’s authority to approve drugs for OTC sale Case of Plan B, politics of reproductive rights overshadowed the science of how effective it was