Expanding from Creek to Hydroelectric Diversion Facilities – Construction and in situ evaluation of large half-duplex PIT tag antennas to evaluate fish entrainment at high velocity water diversions
In silico drugs analogue design: novobiocin analogues.pptx
Use of large half-duplex PIT tag antennas to evaluate entrainment
1. Expanding from Creek to Hydroelectric Diversion Facilities –
Construction and in situ evaluation of large half-duplex PIT tag antennas
to evaluate fish entrainment at high velocity water diversions
Presented by: Doug Demko
Contributing Scientists: Gabriel
Kopp, Matt Peterson, Dana Lee
2. What is PIT Technology
Uses and Advantages
Unique individual code
Long life, no battery
Small size
Cost effective
Minimal biological impacts
Full Duplex
Monitor greater density of
tags at one time
Half Duplex
Lower cost
Greater read range
More resilient to interference
12 mm
6. Study Objectives
Monitor O. mykiss entrainment at hydroelectric diversion
facilities for over one year
All trout ≥ 60 mm tagged (O. mykiss n=536, S. trutta n=2)
60-129 mm fish (36%) = 12 mm tag
130 mm and larger (64%) = 23 mm tag
Estimate entrainment based on known number of potentially
vulnerable fish with PIT tags
8. Study Area (cont’d)
Large diversion
tunnels
4.6 m x 3.7 m
4.4 m x 4.4 m
High flows
≤ 24.4 cms
(≤ 845 cfs)
≤ 31.1 cms
(≤ 1072cfs)
High Velocity
Measured max
= 1.5 m/s
Calculated max
= 3.7 m/s
9. Fabrication
Three antenna stacked array
Hydrodynamic “wing” design
Rigid, strong, and durable
Multiple layers of woven fiberglass mat
Over 1400 hours spent fabricating both arrays ($125,000 USD)
PIT detection wire embedded in fiberglass during fabrication
11. Operation
99% of all diverted flows
monitored for entrained
fish
Antennas and electronics
highly reliable
Minimal required
maintenance
Manually re-tune
antennas
Easily removable -
allowing built up debris to
wash through system
13. Flow in Oregon Creek Diversion Tunnel
Maximum discharge in Oregon Creek Diversion Tunnel was
31.1 metersᶾ/sec (1072 cfs)
Average flow was 4.1 metersᶾ/sec (144.2 cfs) over entire study period
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Metersᶾ/second
14. Entrainment Results
A total of 220 detection events representing 58 unique
fish observations
Many fish were detected multiple times, indicative of
milling behavior
Few individual fish detected at both diversion tunnels
Entrainment rate relatively low
15. Fabrication Results
Innovative and successful design, application, and
deployment of half-duplex antenna technology
Large half-duplex fiberglass antennas can be
constructed to withstand high flows/velocities at
large water diversions
Detection efficiencies (average greater than 90%)
and reliability high enough to effectively evaluate
entrainment
A Passive Integrated Transponder tag is a radio frequency device that transmits a unique individual code to a reader where it is displayed in a numeric or alphanumeric form. The tag has no internal battery, hence the term “passive". The reader powers or excites the tag circuitry by radio frequency induction and receives the code back from the tag. Radio frequency identification does not require line of sight, tags can be read as long as they are within the range of a reader.
Tags can be detected through materials like plastics, water, wood products, animal tissue and bone, fabrics, fiberglass, rock and most nonferrous metals.
Full-duplex (FDX) and half-duplex (HDX) both operate at 134.2 kHz frequency, but there are differences in how the tags transmit and are received by the antenna. A FDX system receives and transmits simultaneously as opposed to a HDX system that transmits then receives. FDX antenna receivers continuously emit a magnetic charge field that charges the tag and listens for the tag to transmit an ID code at a rate of up to 30 reads per second while the HDX receiver stops emitting magnetic charge while listening for a tag transmission resulting in a slower read rate of up to 14 reads per second. Because HDX tags have a capacitor to momentarily store energy, the tags transmit a stronger signal in a greater read range. However, the trade-off for a stronger signal is a larger tag in the HDX system.
All fish tagged within 2.5 km upstream of diversion facilities
12 mm tag used in any fish between 60 – 129 mm (36% of all tagged fish)
23 mm tag used in any fish longer than 130 mm (64% of all tagged fish)
Mortality resulting from PIT tagging was generally low. PIT tags are relatively small in volume,
lack a battery, and are lightweight. The surgical procedure generally took less than 2 minutes,
which is comparable to past studies (Moore et al. 1990). The minimal handling time and reduced
influence of the tag has been shown to result in low mortality rates (Jonasson et al. 2004 and
Jones and Burum 1998).
Discharge in Oregon Creek varied from 0.06 cms to 18.5 cms (2-654 cfs) over the length of the study period
Discharge averaged 0.4 cms (13.4 cfs) over entire study period
Discharge in the Middle Yuba River varied from 0.7 cms to 206.6 cms (24-7296 cfs) over the length of the study period
Discharge averaged 1.9 cms (65.4 cfs) over entire study period
The largest PIT antenna in the world is the Bonneville Dam Corner Collector (5.2 m x 5.2 m), built by Destron-Fearing and installed in 2006. Due to limitations in the technology, the system misses over 50% of the tagged fish under quiet noise conditions.
Our design allowed for coverage of nearly the same area with single antenna loops that spanned only 1.5 m and consequently helped us meet our study plan objective of 80% efficiency.
Arrays were fabricated from fiberglass in a ‘wing’ shape to ensure that the large antenna would be resilient with minimal hydrodynamic drag. The shape of the crossbeams allowed water to flow by with little drag and ensured that minimal debris was accumulated on the antenna. Each crossbeam was constructed with over 15 layers of 12 oz. fiberglass mat. Fiberglass provided strength and, did not interfere with the detection field. The rigidity of the antenna was crucial to maintain proper tuning of the array and maximize read ranges within the array. The PIT detection wire was embedded into the fiberglass as it was fabricated.
Assessing effectiveness of the PIT antenna arrays was quantifiable by determining the percent of diverted flows monitored and the effectiveness of the arrays when monitoring occurred.
Maintenance required lifting antenna and debris rack from front of diversion tunnel and allowing debris to wash through system
Depending on flow conditions, detection efficiencies of the antennas was tested by passing a test tag through the grid by hand or floating a test tag through the antennas from upstream. During periods when efficiency tests were not conducted, individual antenna amperages were used to monitor detection efficiency and performance of each array since antenna amperages and antenna detection efficiency are positively correlated.
Detection area: approximately 2.5 ft or 1.0 ft upstream and downstream of the antenna depending on the size of the tag used for testing (23 mm or 12 mm). This created an area of approximately 707 and 854 cubic feet, for the two tunnels respectively, in which a 23 mm tag could be detected.
Depending on flow conditions, detection efficiencies of the antennas was tested by passing a test tag through the grid by hand or floating a test tag through the antennas from upstream. During periods when efficiency tests were not conducted, individual antenna amperages were used to monitor detection efficiency and performance of each array since antenna amperages and antenna detection efficiency are positively correlated.
Number of unique fish detected at both Our House (OH) and Log Cabin (LC) Diversion Dams = 58
Number of unique detection events (separated by a minimum of 30 minutes) = 220
Number of fish that have been detected at both sites (OH -> LC) = 30
Number of unique fish that have been tagged in Middle Yuba and detected at OH = 48
Number of unique fish that have been tagged in Oregon Creek and detected at LC = 8
Number of unique fish that have been tagged in Middle Yuba and detected at LC = 30
Number of fish that have been tagged in Middle Yuba, NOT detected at OH, then detected at LC = 1
Percent of fish that have been detected at OH arrays based on number of fish passing each site = 96.15
Number of unique fish detected at both Our House (OH) and Log Cabin (LC) Diversion Dams = 58
Number of unique detection events (separated by a minimum of 30 minutes) = 220
Number of fish that have been detected at both sites (OH -> LC) = 30
Number of unique fish that have been tagged in Middle Yuba and detected at OH = 48
Number of unique fish that have been tagged in Oregon Creek and detected at LC = 8
Number of unique fish that have been tagged in Middle Yuba and detected at LC = 30
Number of fish that have been tagged in Middle Yuba, NOT detected at OH, then detected at LC = 1
Percent of fish that have been detected at OH arrays based on number of fish passing each site = 96.15