The document summarizes the development of a Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) partnership in the Cotswold Catchment area. The partnership grew from an earlier pilot project and involves farmers, private sector groups, local communities, and public agencies. It takes a partnership approach to identify ecosystem services provided in the catchment, including water quality, flood control, energy production, and more. The PES framework pays farmers for land management practices that secure these services for beneficiaries. It uses a social learning process where data is shared and management options are jointly discussed and developed. The long-term goal is to implement the PES framework to support sustainable farming practices that maintain ecosystem services in the catchment area.
Legal and Policy Framework for Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in ThailandCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given by Orapan Nabangchang on the “Regional workshop on Payment for Environmental Services” on November 20 2014 in Hanoi, Vietnam. The overall aim of the workshop was to enhance the understanding and capacity of policy makers, PES practioners, and researcher communities on the topic of payments for ecosystem services and ecosystem-based approaches and also to increase dialogue between them on latest lessons learned and recommendations for effective, efficient and equitable implementation of PES.
Payments for Environmental Services (PES) programs in CambodiaCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given on the “Regional workshop on Payment for Environmental Services” on November 20 2014 in Hanoi, Vietnam. The overall aim of the workshop was to enhance the understanding and capacity of policy makers, PES practioners, and researcher communities on the topic of payments for ecosystem services and ecosystem-based approaches and also to increase dialogue between them on latest lessons learned and recommendations for effective, efficient and equitable implementation of PES.
Payment for Ecosystem Services Pilot Implementation in Mae Sa-Kog Ma Biospher...CIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given on the “Regional workshop on Payment for Environmental Services” on November 19 2014 in Hanoi, Vietnam. The overall aim of the workshop was to enhance the understanding and capacity of policy makers, PES practioners, and researcher communities on the topic of payments for ecosystem services and ecosystem-based approaches and also to increase dialogue between them on latest lessons learned and recommendations for effective, efficient and equitable implementation of PES.
Barriers & Opportunities to Payments for Ecosystem Services in EnglandAberdeen CES
Presentation given by Steve Smith from Scott Wilson URS about preliminary findings from research commissioned by Defra into barriers and opportunities for PES in England
Multiple financial streams and benefits harnessed and bundledCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given on the “Regional workshop on Payment for Environmental Services” on November 20 2014 in Hanoi, Vietnam. The overall aim of the workshop was to enhance the understanding and capacity of policy makers, PES practioners, and researcher communities on the topic of payments for ecosystem services and ecosystem-based approaches and also to increase dialogue between them on latest lessons learned and recommendations for effective, efficient and equitable implementation of PES.
Legal and Policy Framework for Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in ThailandCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given by Orapan Nabangchang on the “Regional workshop on Payment for Environmental Services” on November 20 2014 in Hanoi, Vietnam. The overall aim of the workshop was to enhance the understanding and capacity of policy makers, PES practioners, and researcher communities on the topic of payments for ecosystem services and ecosystem-based approaches and also to increase dialogue between them on latest lessons learned and recommendations for effective, efficient and equitable implementation of PES.
Payments for Environmental Services (PES) programs in CambodiaCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given on the “Regional workshop on Payment for Environmental Services” on November 20 2014 in Hanoi, Vietnam. The overall aim of the workshop was to enhance the understanding and capacity of policy makers, PES practioners, and researcher communities on the topic of payments for ecosystem services and ecosystem-based approaches and also to increase dialogue between them on latest lessons learned and recommendations for effective, efficient and equitable implementation of PES.
Payment for Ecosystem Services Pilot Implementation in Mae Sa-Kog Ma Biospher...CIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given on the “Regional workshop on Payment for Environmental Services” on November 19 2014 in Hanoi, Vietnam. The overall aim of the workshop was to enhance the understanding and capacity of policy makers, PES practioners, and researcher communities on the topic of payments for ecosystem services and ecosystem-based approaches and also to increase dialogue between them on latest lessons learned and recommendations for effective, efficient and equitable implementation of PES.
Barriers & Opportunities to Payments for Ecosystem Services in EnglandAberdeen CES
Presentation given by Steve Smith from Scott Wilson URS about preliminary findings from research commissioned by Defra into barriers and opportunities for PES in England
Multiple financial streams and benefits harnessed and bundledCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given on the “Regional workshop on Payment for Environmental Services” on November 20 2014 in Hanoi, Vietnam. The overall aim of the workshop was to enhance the understanding and capacity of policy makers, PES practioners, and researcher communities on the topic of payments for ecosystem services and ecosystem-based approaches and also to increase dialogue between them on latest lessons learned and recommendations for effective, efficient and equitable implementation of PES.
Healthy ecosystems provide a variety of such critical goods and services. Created by the interactions of living organisms with their environment, these “ecosystem services” provide both the conditions and processes that sustain human life. The awareness of ecosystem services’ importance in human life styles started more than 2500 years ago. Economists have developed different ways to measure the economic value of the nature, all of which required extrapolation or assumptions.
Ignorance, Institutions and Market Failure are the main reasons to the under-protected status of Ecosystem Services. The environment provides critically important services. Some of these are captured by markets, but many are not. They are positive externalities that are therefore regarded by the beneficiaries as free. As a result, many ecosystem services tend to be both under-conserved and undervalued. If beneficiaries had to pay for explicit service provision, however, governments would think differently about their policies and property owners would think very differently about sustainable land management practices. In basic economic terms, payments for ecosystem services (PES) seek to “get the incentives right” by capturing the positive externalities, by providing accurate signals to both service providers and users that reflect the real social benefits that ecosystem services deliver.
Voluntary agreements between buyers and sellers of ecosystem services for cash or other rewards creating markets for ecosystem services which provide incentives and finance to land and resource managers and thereby strengthening conservation and livelihoods are called as PES.
Wide range of potential buyers and sellers are available depending on the ecosystem service. When the market fails to reward on-site ecosystem service providers, or to compensate them for their costs (e.g. changing land use) charge off-site users for the benefits they enjoy (e.g. clean water) PES create a market for natural resources making conservation a more profitable land-use proposition. Information, technical barriers, policy and regulation and institutional barriers are the major challenges in implementing PES.
Creating economic incentives that encourage PES schemes, including environmental taxes and subsidies, transferable discharge permits and environmental labelling, developing specific PES projects with farmers, foresters and/or fisher folks in their region, or their watershed and providing incentives for the private sector to engage in PES schemes are some recommendations for a better PES system.
On 17 and 18 June 2020 the EPA held its National Water Event as an online conference.
This year's theme was 'Restoring our waters'.
This years event was free to attend. It was the EPA's largest water event ever, with over 1250 attending.
To everyone who joined us: thanks for attending; thanks for your probing questions; thanks for your passion; thanks for caring about our waters. We can achieve more working together.
Special thanks to all our presenters and the team who worked behind the scenes to make sure this years conference happened.
For science and stories about water quality in Ireland, check out www.catchments.ie
Tourism: a strategic partnership for protected areasmelaniehwagner
View \'Tourism: a strategic partnership for protected areas\' - the \'Theme Stream\' Workshop from the Foundation for National Parks & Wildlife\'s former CEO Leonie Gale, and current Board Director Angus M. Robinson. It was delivered on November 9th 2011 at the Global Asia Pacific Eco Tourism Conference in Sydney, NSW Australia.
This is a presentation made by David Marshall at Keepers of the Water in Fort Nelson, BC September 2012. He is Executive Director at the Fraser Basin Council.
Rasal, V., Everard, M., Khandal, D., Chandrawal, K., & Sahu, Y. K. (2021). EVALUATION OF THE ECOSYSTEM SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE KAILADEVI WILDLIFE SANCTUARY, RAJASTHAN, INDIA. PARKS, 27, 13.
Healthy ecosystems provide a variety of such critical goods and services. Created by the interactions of living organisms with their environment, these “ecosystem services” provide both the conditions and processes that sustain human life. The awareness of ecosystem services’ importance in human life styles started more than 2500 years ago. Economists have developed different ways to measure the economic value of the nature, all of which required extrapolation or assumptions.
Ignorance, Institutions and Market Failure are the main reasons to the under-protected status of Ecosystem Services. The environment provides critically important services. Some of these are captured by markets, but many are not. They are positive externalities that are therefore regarded by the beneficiaries as free. As a result, many ecosystem services tend to be both under-conserved and undervalued. If beneficiaries had to pay for explicit service provision, however, governments would think differently about their policies and property owners would think very differently about sustainable land management practices. In basic economic terms, payments for ecosystem services (PES) seek to “get the incentives right” by capturing the positive externalities, by providing accurate signals to both service providers and users that reflect the real social benefits that ecosystem services deliver.
Voluntary agreements between buyers and sellers of ecosystem services for cash or other rewards creating markets for ecosystem services which provide incentives and finance to land and resource managers and thereby strengthening conservation and livelihoods are called as PES.
Wide range of potential buyers and sellers are available depending on the ecosystem service. When the market fails to reward on-site ecosystem service providers, or to compensate them for their costs (e.g. changing land use) charge off-site users for the benefits they enjoy (e.g. clean water) PES create a market for natural resources making conservation a more profitable land-use proposition. Information, technical barriers, policy and regulation and institutional barriers are the major challenges in implementing PES.
Creating economic incentives that encourage PES schemes, including environmental taxes and subsidies, transferable discharge permits and environmental labelling, developing specific PES projects with farmers, foresters and/or fisher folks in their region, or their watershed and providing incentives for the private sector to engage in PES schemes are some recommendations for a better PES system.
On 17 and 18 June 2020 the EPA held its National Water Event as an online conference.
This year's theme was 'Restoring our waters'.
This years event was free to attend. It was the EPA's largest water event ever, with over 1250 attending.
To everyone who joined us: thanks for attending; thanks for your probing questions; thanks for your passion; thanks for caring about our waters. We can achieve more working together.
Special thanks to all our presenters and the team who worked behind the scenes to make sure this years conference happened.
For science and stories about water quality in Ireland, check out www.catchments.ie
Tourism: a strategic partnership for protected areasmelaniehwagner
View \'Tourism: a strategic partnership for protected areas\' - the \'Theme Stream\' Workshop from the Foundation for National Parks & Wildlife\'s former CEO Leonie Gale, and current Board Director Angus M. Robinson. It was delivered on November 9th 2011 at the Global Asia Pacific Eco Tourism Conference in Sydney, NSW Australia.
This is a presentation made by David Marshall at Keepers of the Water in Fort Nelson, BC September 2012. He is Executive Director at the Fraser Basin Council.
Rasal, V., Everard, M., Khandal, D., Chandrawal, K., & Sahu, Y. K. (2021). EVALUATION OF THE ECOSYSTEM SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE KAILADEVI WILDLIFE SANCTUARY, RAJASTHAN, INDIA. PARKS, 27, 13.
Presentation given by Rhiannon Naylor, Damian Maye, Alice Hamilton-Webb and Ruth Little at the recent European Society for Rural Sociology Congress - 'Places of Possibility? Rural Societies in a Neoliberal World' in Aberdeen.
An internship report by visiting student Yumiko Yamamoto from the University of Kyoto. The report investigates management of Rights of Way and the Cotswold Way in the United Kingdom. With assistance from Kate Ashbrook from the Open Spaces Society.
2013 Nonprofit Seminar - Conducted by Chambliss, Bahner & Stophel, along with the Center for Nonprofits and Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga
Le Leggi dell’Abbondanza
www.ipoteridelsubconscio.com/subconscio.html
2012
Di seguito spiegate le Leggi dell’Abbondanza che Stuart Wilde ha espresso e divulgato nel suo libro.Per un approfondimento miglore ed un percorso di cambiamento duraturo ed eccellente visita il sito: www.ipoteridelsubconscio.co.cc/positivdiary.html dove troverai spunti per un cambiamento sereno e duraturo nella tua vita. Potete diffondere questo report in modo gratuito e libero. Vietata la vendita. I POTERI DEL SUBCONSCIO
www.ipoteridelsubconscio.com/
The focus for the project
was an exploration of the social impacts
arising from the Cod Recovery Plan. The
work provided input to the evaluation of
multi-annual plans for Cod in the Irish Sea,
Kattegat, North Sea, Eastern Channel,
and West of Scotland being undertaken
by the Scientific, Technical and Economic
Committee for Fisheries (STECF).
Dan Keech's presentation at a meeting of the Bath and North East Somerset Local Food Partnership. This is the multi-stakeholder network which oversees the implementation of the council's Local Food Strategy. The strategy combines work on public health, food and agriculture sector development and the environmental footprint of the food chain. More information about Dan can be found at: http://www.ccri.ac.uk/keech/
Presentation given by Mauro Vigani at the recent ICAE conference in Milan.
The aim of the work is to provide a comprehensive analysis on the impact of maize technologies at household level in Tanzania, disentangling the effect of improved maize seeds and inorganic fertilizers on each of the four dimensions of food security
In recent years researchers have displayed an interest in understanding the rural dynamics in other regions of the world which are also being affected by global processes in different ways and the sum result is great global spatial diversity.
This presentation explores challenges to sustainable farming; the need to embed sustainability into farm business management; and the role policy plays in encouraging farming communities to adopt sustainable practices.
Presentation at the 2014 annual international conference of the Royal Geographical Society - Institute of British Geographers, held in London on August 27th-29th.
The paper provided an analysis of farmer knowledge networks in relation to bovine TB and argues that understandings of farmers’ knowledge networks relating to animal disease control are weak. TB is used as a case study and scenario analysis to determine the networks that farmers would draw upon in particular situations. The research team developed four different scenarios to control TB in the future: a badger cull in hot spot areas, an oral badger vaccine, a cattle vaccine, and a range of measures. The findings confirmed the importance of certain so-called ‘influencers’, such as private vets and the NFU, as well as Defra. The influence of other farmers is also notable but the findings raise interesting questions about how farmers are influenced by their peers – typically more to compare practise / reactions than to obtain information. At the end of the paper these specific findings are related to more general questions about the merits of using scenarios and influence maps to inform TB and other complex policy areas and wider debates about ‘stakeholdership’ and ‘partnership’ governance.
Aims of Presentation:
Part1: To present some of Prof Beckert’s ideas about the social order and coordinating ‘problems’ inherent in market exchange.
Ask: Can Beckert’s ideas be adapted so that they are useful for observing environmental outcomes from rural markets? In this case the environmental mission is conceptualised as orchard biosphere conservation.
Part 2: Explore that question with recourse to research on some German social enterprises, ie. I will attempt the leap.
Dan Keech teamed up with former CCRI colleague, Professor Owain Jones (now Bath Spa University), to deliver a presentation at the 2014 annual international conference of the Royal Geographical Society - Institute of British Geographers, which was held in London on August 27th-29th. Two sessions were convened on the co-productive influences of ruins.
Chris Short (CCRI) and Jenny Phelps (Gloucestershire FWAG) discuss their findings and experiences from work on developing an integrated approach to environmental outcomes - Integrated Local Delivery (ILD).
Presented at the IASC 2014 European conference, this paper explores how institutional design and social-ecological perspectives can inform governance of catchments. It focuses on ‘Catchment-Based Approach (CaBA) in England - and stems from the EU Water Framework Directive.
Donal Daly, EPA Catchment Science and Management Unit outlines a possible approach to integrating Water Framework Directive and Biodiversity goals at the catchment scale.
The Comox Valley Conservatin Strategy is an ecosystem-based conservation plan for the protection and restoration of natural areas and sensitive ecosystems of the Comox Valley.
The Comox Valley Conservation Strategy is a land-use planning framework with conservation as its primary focus. It identifies critical ecosystems and natural areas for protection and restoration and links them together to form a network.
Presentation given by Professor Janet Dwyer at ‘The Rural Hub Partnership Rural & Farming Network Forum’ on 26 November 2014. This forum explored the topic of ‘How can we champion the rural economy in Herefordshire’
The Partnership approach & assessing the benefits of catchment management. 12th & 13th September 2016 at the Rougemont Hotel, Exeter. Following the decision to leave the EU the need to come together to tackle the complex environmental problems we face such as diffuse pollution and habitat fragmentation has never been greater. This conference sets out the benefits and drawbacks of partnership working and the effectiveness of dealing with problems at a catchment scale.
Sania Dzalbe is a PhD student in economic geography at Umeå University in Sweden who studies how people in rural areas adapt to crisis and adversity. Drawing from her upbringing in rural Latvia, she notes the importance of social reproduction in sustaining rural livelihoods, which often goes overlooked in traditional regional economic analysis. She argues that the concept of resilience is connected to the concept of loss, as during moments of crisis and major restructuring, societies lose not only jobs and industries but also the very mechanisms through which they shape their environment, both physically and socially. Current resilience studies in economic geography tend to disregard the role of social reproduction and the losses experienced by individuals by predominantly focusing on firms and economic production. However, to understand the evolution of rural regions and communities amid various challenges they face, one must recognize that social reproduction cannot be separated from economic and knowledge production processes.
A presentation of participatory research methods and how CCRI has used them over time throughto the Living Labs approach now in use in a number of our grant funded research projects.
This presentation introduces the UK Treescapes Ambassador team and the research projects and research fellows they have funded under the programme.
The presentation also looks at some of the research being carried out at the CCRI on Trees, Woods and Forests.
This presentation highlights key methods and issues arising from the research in the EU Horizon funded projects MINAGRIS and SPRINT regading the presence and effect of pesticides and plastics in the soil.
This presentation considers the changing policy environment for public funding of agri-environment, the shift from entitlements to action-based funding and 'public good' outcomes, using a 'Test and Trials' case study.
Footage for the associated seminar: https://youtu.be/Z0Hkt7Sf0VA
The talk will focus on the current state of soil governance in Australia, alongside the recently released National Soil Strategy and debate how knowledge exchange on sustainable soil management is progressing. The need to maintain a healthy and functioning soil that is resilient and less vulnerable to climate change and land degradation is an ever-present goal. Yet to achieve this goal requires a critical mass of soil scientists who can effectively undertake research and more importantly people who can communicate such knowledge to farmers so that soil is protected through the use of landscape-appropriate practices. Decades of government de-investment and privatisation have led to a diminished and fragmented workforce that is distant from, rather than part of, the rural community, and farmers are also increasingly isolated with few functional social networks for knowledge exchange. Is it possible to chart a course that can see this decline in expertise and local soil knowledge corrected, and restore to it vitality and legitimacy?
Presentation made to CCRI as part of our seminar series. Footage of seminar: https://youtu.be/tWcArqtqxjI
Latvian meadows are inextricably connected to the Latvian identity. An identity built on the concept of the industrious peasant working their own land, free from the oppression of tyrannical regimes. This cultural association also feeds into the mid-summer festivals as the women weave the flower-filled crowns and people collect herbal teas to ward off illness over the winter. These biodiverse havens are under threat, as they are neglected or replaced with improved grasslands with their higher yields but lower diversity.
Complex agri-environmental issues cannot be solved through the work of an isolated farmer; rather, tackling these issues requires groups of farmers and land managers to work together, engaging with more sustainable practices. To ensure their work is effective, individuals must form a cohesive group in which all members are prepared to work towards a shared goal.
The Countryside Stewardship Facilitation Fund (CSFF) provides an intentional investment in the development of social and intellectual capital in farmer and land manager groups in England, such that they may work together successfully. This seminar draws on research with four CSFF groups to explore the extent to which group membership prepares individual farmers and land managers for collective action using Nahapiet and Ghoshal’s theory of social and intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. It examines the findings from 21 interviews with farmers and land managers, four interviews with group facilitators and four interviews with staff from group partner organisations. In addition, participant observation was conducted at six group events to examine group relationships and the process of intellectual capital exchange.
The results build on previous findings which demonstrate the importance of social capital in the collective management of natural resources. Specifically, this work explores the role of the facilitator in social capital development, the importance of continuity during group development, the drivers of, and barriers to, the combination and exchange of intellectual capital, and the preconditions required for collective action to occur. The findings are used to develop an extension of Nahapiet and Ghoshal’s framework. This seminar will demonstrate that the development of social and natural capital are interdependent. It will argue for policy which better supports the formation of relationships in which farmers and land managers feel able to work with their peers to deliver landscape-scale environmental change.
Professor Ian Hodge's seminar for the CCRI on 24th October 2022.
There are two emergent movements in the governance of rural land: voluntary and local government initiatives that assess, plan and enhance landscape and biodiversity and a largely separate central government initiative for the development of Environmental Land Management (ELM) schemes as a key element of national agricultural policy. This is developed and implemented by central government with a relatively large budget.
These two movements should be better integrated through the development of a system of Local Environmental Governance Organisations (LEGOs). A LEGO would stand as a ‘trustee’ with a remit to protect and enhance the quality of the local environment in the long term. It can assemble evidence on natural capital, co-ordinate amongst stakeholders and work with them to identify local priorities for nature recovery. It would search for synergies and collaborative partnerships and raise funds to support priority projects. A key point is that a proportion of central government funding should be devolved to LEGOs. This would link the vision being developed locally with the capacity to generate financial incentives for land managers to change land management.
Natural Cambridgeshire as the Local Nature Partnership is developing a number of the attributes of a LEGO. It is engaging with and appears to have support from a broad variety of stakeholders and is energising actions at several different levels. Through a local deliberative process, it can have a much clearer view of local opportunities and priorities than can be possible via central government. Natural Cambridgeshire has begun to raise funds but the likelihood is that this is will be too little, relatively short term and unsystematic. Longer term core funding would give Natural Cambridgeshire the capacity to back up proposals with financial support, potentially matching funding from other sources. It would then need to monitor and audit the implementation of projects and report on expenditure and outcomes. Over time it would adopt an adaptive approach to respond to outcomes and changing threats and opportunities.
National government needs to establish a framework for the development and operation of a system of LEGOs. It would continue to act in support of national standards, both through regulation and investment to meet international commitments, such as for biodiversity and climate change.
The presentation will give a brief overview of the 'UrbanFarmer' project and its various facets, including the integration of a cohort of Norwegian farmers and agricultural research organisations in the co-production of applied knowledge.
The main thrust of the presentation will be to present similarities and differences in the way that food in short food supply chains is marketed through different farm enterprise business models, and different sales channels. Differences in policy backdrops and other, related, contexts which help or hinder urban marketing through short food supply chains concluding with some ideas of emerging recommendations will also be explored.
Dr Anna Birgitte Milford is a researcher at Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, working on topics related to sustainable food production and consumption, including organic/pesticide reduced fruit and veg production, local sales channels and climate friendly diets. She was a visiting scholar at CCRI, University of Gloucestershire in autumn 2021 conducting field research on urban agriculture and local sales channels in Bristol.
Dr Dan Keech is a Senior Research Fellow at CCRI, University of Gloucestershire. His research topics cover European urban and alternative food networks, Anglo-German cultural geography and trans-disciplinary methods which link art and social science.
Slides from Damian Maye's Seminar - Using Living Labs to Strengthen Rural-Urban Linkages - Reflections from a multi-actor research project
Footage available at: https://youtu.be/Es1VHe69Mcw
Dr. Charlotte Chivers' presentation made at World Congress on Soil Science: Social Science approaches for integrating local knowledge when modelling the impact of natural flood management measures
Dr Charlotte Chivers' presentation made at the 2022 World Congress of Soil Science detailing the EU Horizon 2020 funded project MINAGRIS - MIcro- and Nano-plastics in AGRIcultural Soils
Presentation given by Dr Alessio Russ 8th July for CCRI seminar series.
Over the last few decades, the school of thought surrounding the urban ecosystem has increasingly become in vogue among researchers worldwide. Since half of the world’s population lives in cities, urban ecosystem services have become essential to human health and wellbeing. Rapid urban growth has forced sustainable urban developers to rethink important steps by updating and, to some degree, recreating the human–ecosystem service linkage. This talk addresses concepts and metaphors such as nature-based solutions and wellbeing, ecosystem services, nature-based thinking, urban regeneration, urban agriculture, urban-rural interface, rewilding.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
2. Development of PES partnership
• Grew from Upper Thames Pilot Catchment
• Identify PES assets within the catchment (ILD)
o People (the sellers and beneficiaries)
o Link existing data and programmes (Defra pilot)
o Partnership approach to development
o Shared problem solving
3. Who is involved
• Sellers – farmers involved at start, data input
• Beneficiaries/Buyers
• Private sector (Thames Water, Ecotricity)
• Local communities (develop and benefit from)
• Public Sector (EA and NE)
• Facilitators – making links, develop
framework
4. What is ‘in’ the PES framework
•
•
•
•
•
•
Water Quality (drinking water and WFD)
Community services (flood, amenity, others)
Energy production with benefits (Ecotricity)
Water flow & biodiversity (EA, NE, communitys)
Food production/protected landscape/tourism
Layering of PES (via restoration of catchment)
5. Achieved by
• PES securing appropriate farming practice
– Selection and location of crops
– Rotation and pest management
– Combined food and energy
– Soil management for PES
• Secure enough for Buyers?
• Viable for Sellers?
9. Concerted action
• By farmer on farm
– Nitrate, Phosphate and
Ammonia + field diary
• By TW/UWE
– Metaldehyde, pesticides
• By CSF – organic matter
• Joint discussion of data
• Agree way forward
– management options
– knowledge gaps
13
12
1
1
9
10
7
6
8
5
4
3
2
1
10. Summary of PES Approach
• Partnership approach (Phase 1)
– Part of the solution, in at the start
•
•
•
•
•
•
Multiple services under one (layered) PES
Sellers and Buyers involved in developing
Demonstration events & knowledge exchange
Co-production of options
Development of PES framework (Phase 2)
Phase 3 onwards to deal with implementation