Persuasion writing assignment (900 – 1500 words)About hoax pictu.docx

Persuasion writing assignment (900 – 1500 words)
About hoax picture
Introduction
Summary
(0.5 page)
-what does the text try to persuade the reader to think or to do?
-how is the text organize d on the page?
Tell the type of the writing
Evaluation
(0.75 – 1 page)
+50% believe –what does characteristics of the text make
believed?
-50% unbelieve- –what does characteristics of the text make
unbelieved?
Debunk
Analysis
(0.75 – 1page)
Reveal the implication
Tell if there hidden messages
subtext
Conclusion
*Stay away of “I” statement
*it is not an essay
BMGT 364 Grading Rubrics
Participation Rubric for Learning Activities (24%)
Category
Outstanding Superior Good Substandard

2.7 - 3 2.4 - 2.6 2.1 - 2.3 0 - 2
Evidence of
critical thinking
(analysis,
synthesis,
evaluation and
reflection) of class
reading material
and discussion
analysis, synthesis,
evaluation and
reflection is
strongly present
across all posts;
rich in content
full of thought,
insight,
and analysis
analysis,
synthesis,
evaluation and
reflection is
present in most
posts - substantial
information
thought, insight,
and analysis has
taken place
attempts
analysis,
synthesis,

evaluation, and
reflection but not
strongly evident
or only partially
evident -
generally
competent
information is
thin and
commonplace
analysis, synthesis,
evaluation, and
reflection is poorly
demonstrated or
does not exist;
rudimentary and
superficial; no
analysis or insight
is displayed
Responses to
classmates and
instructor reflect
a substantive
understanding of
course material
responses to
instructor/classmat
es are complete
and meaningful as
required;
responses extend
the discussion
exceeding all

requirements
responses to
instructor/classma
tes are complete
and meaningful as
required;
responses are
relevant and
advance the level
and depth of the
discussion
occasionally using
the course
material in the
responses
responds to
instructor/classm
ates meet
requirements but
either a)
responses lack
some detail to
explain answer;
b) responses do
not add to the
conversation; c)
student does not
use course
material; d)
student does not
fails to respond to
classmates and/or
instructor as

required;
responses are
superficial (I agree
statements,
restating what
other student
stated; response
that evaluates the
quality of a
student's post
adding no
substantial
respond to as
many peers as
required or e)
lacks consistency
in responding to
others
comment)
Relevance of
participation to
topic under
discussion
contributions are
relevant and
demonstrates
outstanding
understanding of
material; uses
various course

material/resources
in responding, and
consistently and
accurately ties to
activity
contributions are
relevant and
mostly
demonstrates a
good
understanding of
material; uses
some course
material/resource
s in responding
and attempts to
ties to activity
contributions are
somewhat
relevant and
demonstrates
some
understanding of
the material;
rarely uses
course
material/resourc
es in responses
and occasionally
ties to activity
contributions are
off topic,
distracting; does

not use relevant
course
material/resources
in responses
Writing
mechanics and
APA usage
consistently uses
grammatically
correct posts with
no misspellings and
no APA style errors
few grammatical
or spelling errors
are noted in
posts/ attempts
in-text citations
and reference list
but errors are
present
errors in spelling
and grammar
evident;
attempts in-text
citations or
reference list but
omits the other;
paraphrases or
uses source
material without
consistently
citing/referencin

poor spelling and
grammar in most
posts; no evidence
of proofreading;
no attempt at APA
g
Project Descriptions
Always submit your best, most thoughtful work. Assignments
should be well organized and should demonstrate the level of
writing
expected of college students at the 300 level. Present your
ideas as thoroughly as you can, providing examples and
appropriate
citations, (using the Publication Manual of the American
Psychological Association, 6th edition). You must adhere to the
page-length
requirements identified for each assignment. Your writing style
is very important, and you will be graded on this aspect of your
work
in such areas as organization, grammar, punctuation, etc.
Creative approaches, evidence of critical thinking, and detailed
answers are required. If you disagree with the materials

presented in
the course, argue your point with verifiable examples and
outside data, properly documented and cited. Remember that
even
paraphrased material requires proper citation (use APA format,
both within the text and in your reference list). Post your
assignments
as an attachment in your assignment folder on or before the due
date (use Word or an RTF file format). Late submissions are not
accepted. Make a backup copy of your work in case you
experience computer or network problems when you are
uploading your
assignment. Submitted assignments will be considered your
final submission and submissions by email afterward will not be
accepted.
Review and use the instructions and rubric for each assignment.
Review the APA guidelines under Course Overview prior to
submission. Check that all citations and references are correct
and noted within your paper. Turnitin may be used to review
each paper
for plagiarism.
Assignment 1 Organizational Theory (Week 3)

Purpose:
In the first assignment, students are given a scenario in which
the shipping manager who has worked for Recycled Furnishings
since
the inception of the company is getting ready to retire. The
scenario serves to set the stage for students to demonstrate how
management theories have changed over time. For example,
managing 30 years ago is different than managing in the 21
st
century.
Outcome Met by Completing This Assignment:
management practices
Instructions:
In Part One of this case study analysis, students are to use the
facts from the case study to determine two different
organization
theories that are demonstrated. For Part Two, students will
compare the 21
st
century manager to that of the main character in the case
study and the implications of change in being a 21
st
century manager.
In selecting an organizational theory that best describes the
current shipping manager, students will use the timeline to

select a school
of thought and a theory or theories of that time frame. Students
will need to research the theorist(s) and theories to complete the
assignment and answer the questions below. Students are
expected to be thorough in responding to Part One.
In Part Two, students are going to take what they have learned
in weeks 1 – 3 and compare the management skills of the
current
shipping manager to that of you as the new shipping manager.
Step 1: Review “How to Analyze a Case Study” under Week 3
Content.
Step 2: Create a Word or Rich Text Format (RTF) document
that is double-spaced, 12-point font. The final product will be
between
4-5 pages in length excluding the title page and reference page.
Step 3: Review the grading rubric for the assignment.
Step 4: Use headings following this format:
name;
situation and tells a reader the main points of the paper;

Step 5: In writing a case study, the writing is in the third
person. What this means is that there are no words such as “I,
me, my, we,
or us” (first person writing), nor is there use of “you or your”
(second person writing). If uncertain how to write in the third
person,
view this link:
http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/first-
second-and-third-person
Step 6: In writing this assignment, students are expected to
support the reasoning using in-text citations and a reference list.
If any
material is used from a source, it must be cited and referenced.
A reference within a reference list cannot exist without an
associated
in-text citation and vice versa. View the sample APA paper
under Week 1 content.
paraphrase and not use direct quotes. Learn to paraphrase by
reviewing
this link:
https://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/QPA_paraphrase2.html
Step 8: In writing this assignment, students may use external
resources but the majority of resources will come from the
course.

Step 9: Read critically and analyze the following scenario:
Part One
Scenario:
Recycled Furnishings is a division of an international home
furnishing company called Thor Enterprises. Recycled
Furnishings makes
glass sofas for outdoor use from recycled bottles and glass. The
business has grown rapidly in the last thirty years and now that
it has
become a division of Thor Enterprises, the company is going
international. The shipping manager for Recycled Furnishings,
Robert,
has been in his job since the start of the company. Prior to
coming to Recycled Furnishings, Robert worked as a container
manufacturing engineer at Damco, a local shipping company
and worked his way up to supervisor prior to joining Recycled
Furnishings. Robert, a baby boomer, quickly rose to supervisor
at Damco because of his ability to optimize the way tasks were
performed and his knack to implement processes so workers
could be trained to perform their specialized sequence of motion
in one
best way. He brought this management style to Recycled
Furnishing and helped to improve the methodology of furniture
assembly as

well as the shipping processes.
A major shift in management occurred in the late 1980’s and
early 90’s that caused Robert to reconsider his management
approach. For example, advances in technology, the
organization joining a union, change in the value systems,
organizational design
and globalization all affected the culture of Recycled
Furnishings. Robert was successful with this transformation
and contributed
greatly to the company’s success.
In answering the following questions, make sure that the facts
of the scenario and the course readings support the reasoning of
the
answers provided.
management style when he first joined Recycled Furnishings.
scuss the theorist under the identified school of thought
that best depicts Robert’s management style. What contribution
did
this theorist make to management and why was his or her
contribution important to the field of management?

the school of thought that best describes
the management style Robert used once the shift took place?
Why
is this school of thought the best choice?
thought. Address the principles of the theory and how a
manager
would do his job and interact with his staff. How does what the
theorist proposed support the facts in the case study?
Robert’s early thinking;
Part Two
Scenario:
Recently Robert announced his plans to retire. You have been
hired as his replacement and with the international launch on
the
horizon you have big shoes to fill. You feel you are more than
capable of handling the shipping manager position and
characterize
yourself as a 21
st
century manager.
st
century manager, compare the way you will manage versus the

way of Robert;
future of Thor?
job likely change the
shipping division?
Step 10: Create the introductory paragraph. Within this
paragraph, provide a brief overview of the scenario. Then,
provide a thesis
statement and tell the reader the main topics covered in the
paper. The introductory paragraph is the first paragraph of the
paper but is
typically written after writing the body of the paper (Questions
students responded to above). View this website to learn how
to write
an introductory paragraph:
http://www.writing.ucsb.edu/faculty/donelan/intro.html
Step 11: Respond to the questions in Part One and Part Two
following the format provided. Be clear and concise in the
writing and
make sure the questions are comprehensively answered.
Step 12: Using the grading rubric as a comparison, read
through the paper to ensure all required elements are presented.
Step 13: Proofread the paper for spelling and grammatical
issues, and third person writing.

e someone who has excellent English skills to proof the
paper;
(EWC). The EWC will provide 4-6 areas that may need
improvement.
Step 14: Submit the paper in the Assignment Folder.
Assignment 1 Grading Rubric
Criteria
Outstanding
Superior
Good
Substandard
Failure
Content:
Initial School of
Thought

0.9 points
School of thought
describing
management
style is
explained clearly,
0.765 points
School of thought
describing
management style is
explained accurately
but could be more
0.675 points
School of thought
describing
management
style is

explained needs
0.585 points
School of thought
is identified and
discussed but does
not fit the facts
provided,
0 points
School of
thought is
not discussed.
(0 – 0.539)
accurately and
comprehensively
delivering all

relevant
information.
(0.81 - 0.90)
comprehensively or
clearer with more
relevant
information.
(0.72 - 0.809)
more clarification
on some aspects.
(0.63 - 0.719)
inaccurate
statements are
made or key points
missing.
(0.54 - 0.629)
Content:
Theorist
discussed that
best depicts
management

style and
contributions to
field of
management
explained
0.9 points
Theorist that best
fits is identified
and
discussed. Contrib
utions to
management with
explanation of why
his/her
contribution was
important to field
of management is
described
accurately and
comprehensively

delivering all
relevant
information.
0.765 points
Theorist that best
fits is
identified. Contribu
tions to management
with explanation of
why his/her
contribution was
important to field of
management
is described
sufficiently but is
notconsistently
accurate or

comprehensive and
is missing relevant
information.
(0.72 - 0.809)
0.675 points
Theorist that best
fits is
identified. Contrib
utions to
management with
explanation of why
his/her
contribution was
important to field
of management is
described but
needs more
clarification on

some aspects.
.
(0.63 - 0.719)
0.585 points
Theorist that best
fits is
identified. No
discussion of
theorist
or contributions to
management with
explanation of why
his/her
contribution was
important to field
of management is
not discussed

(0.54 - 0.629)
0 points
Neither theorist
or contributions
to
management was
discussed.
(0 – 0.539)
(0.81 - 0.9)
Content:
School of
Thought Once
Shift Took
Place
0.9 points
School of thought
that best
describes

management style
once shift took
place is selected
and discussed and
why it is the best
choice is discussed
clearly, accurately,
and comprehensive
ly presented
delivering all
relevant
information.
(0.81 - 0.90)
0.765 points
School of thought
that best describes
management style
once shift took place

is selected and
discussed and why it
is the best choice is
discussed
sufficiently but
could be more
accurate and
comprehensive
with more relevant
information.
(0.72 - 0.809)
0.675 points
School of thought
that best
describes
management style
once shift took

place is selected
and discussed and
why it is the best
choice is
discussed but
needs more
clarification on
some aspects.
(0.63 - 0.719)
0.585 points
School of thought
is selected and
discussed but does
not fit the facts
provided. School of
thought identified
and discussed but
an explanation of

why it is the best
choice is missing or
does not fit with
the facts. Key
points are missing.
(0.54 - 0.629)
0 points
Explanation of
appropriate schoo
l of thought is not
identified and
there is no
discussion as
to why it is the
best choice.
(0 – 0.539)
Content:
Select and

Discuss One
Theorist Who
Supports
School of
Thought
0.9 points
Theorist is
discussed and
principle of theory
and how manager
0.765 points
Theorist is
discussed and
principle of theory
and how manager
0.675 points
Theorist is
discussed and
principle of theory

and how manager
0.585 points
Either theorist is
discussed or
principle of theory
and how manager
0 points
Theorist, principle
and how manager
would do job and
interact with staff
are not
would do job and
interact with staff
is discussed
clearly, accurately
and
comprehensively

presented
delivering all
relevant
information. Theori
st proposal
accurately
supported facts in
case study.
(0.81 - 0.90)
would do job and
interact with staff
is the best choice is
discussed
sufficiently but
could be more
accurate or
comprehensively wit
h more relevant

information. Theori
st proposal
supported facts in
case study.
(0.72 - 0.809)
would do job and
interact with staff
is the best choice
is discussed but
needs more
clarification on
some
aspects. Theorist
proposal somewhat
supported facts in
case study.
(0.63 - 0.719)
would do job and
interact with staff

is discussed but
one or the other is
missing. Theorist
proposal did not
supported facts in
case study. Key
points are missing.
(0.54 - 0.629)
discussed. Theori
st proposal was
not addressed.
(0 – 0.539)
Content:
Compare and
Contrast
Management
Thought
0.9 points
Two schools of
thought are
discussed clearly,

accurately and
comprehensively
presented
delivering all
relevant
0.765 points
Two schools of
thought are
discussed
sufficiently but
could be more
comprehensive with
more relevant
information.
0.675 points
Two schools of
thought are

discussed but could
be more completely
explained or need
more clarification
on similarities or
differences.
0.585 points
Attempt at
comparing and
contrasting two
schools but
presentation is
superficial. Key
points are missing.
(0.54 - 0.629)
0 points
Compare and

contrast of
schools of
thought not
presented.
(0 – 0.539)
information.
(0.81 - 0.90)
(0.72 - 0.809) (0.63 - 0.719)
21st Century
Manager
Comparison
0.9 points
21st century
comparison versus
current manager is
clearly, accurately
and

comprehensively
discussed deliverin
g all relevant
information.
(0.81 - 0.90)
0.765 points
21st century
comparison versus
current manager is
discussed
sufficiently but
could be more
comprehensive in
describing
similarities or
differences.
(0.72 - 0.809)
0.675 points

21st century
comparison versus
current manager is
discussed but
needs more
clarication of
similarities or
differences.
(0.63 - 0.719)
0.585 points
21st century
comparison versus
current manager is
superficially
discussed. Key
points are missing.
(0.54 - 0.629)

0 points
21st century
comparison versus
current manager
is not discussed.
(0 – 0.539)
Implications
of Change
Management
0.8 points
Implications are
clearly
and comprehensivel
y
discussed deliverin
g all relevant
information using
0.68 points

Implications are
sufficiently discusse
d but could be more
clear and
comprehensive with
more relevant by
presenting examples
0.6 points
Implications are
discussed but
needs more
clarification of
details and or
examples.
0.52 points
Implications are

superficially
discussed. Key
points are missing.
(0.48 - 0.559)
0 points
Implications not
discussed.
(0 – 0.479)
examples and
detail.
(0,72 - 0.8)
or detail.
(0.64 - 0.719)
(0.56 - 0.639)
Change to
Shipping
Department
0.8 points

New approach is
accurately and
comprehensively
discussed deliverin
g all relevant
information.
(0.72 - 0.8)
0.68 points
New approach is
sufficiently
discussed but could
be more
comprehensive or
clearer with more
relevant
information.
(0.64 - 0.719)

0.6 points
New approach is
discussed but
needs more
clarification
on some aspects.
(0.56 - 0.639)
0.52 points
New approach is
superficially
discussed.
(0.48 - 0.559)
0 points
New approach not
presented.
(0 – 0.479)

Critical
Thinking/Reas
oning
4 points
Concepts and ideas
are fully
developed.
Thinking is
consistent in
accurately
interpreting
questions and
3.4 points
Concepts and ideas
are
developed. Thinking
is mostly consistent
in accurately

interpreting
questions and
material/ provides
3 points
Concepts and ideas
are mostly
developed but may
need clarification
on some aspects of
thinking, reasoning
or
evaluation. Conclus
2.6 points
Concepts and ideas
are not
cohesive. Misinte
rprets questions or

material; ignores
or superficially
evaluates, justifies
little and seldom
0 points
Concepts and
ideas are not fully
developed or
presented in a
cohesive manner.
Misinterprets
questions or
material/provides
solid assumptions,
reasoning and
evaluation with
sound conclusions.

Reader can easily
follow the author's
logic and reasoning.
(3.6 - 4)
good assumptions,
reasoning and
evaluation with
sound
conclusions. Reader
can easily follow the
author's logic and
reasoning.
(3.2 – 3.59 )
ions are
drawn. Reader
follows the
author’s logic but
occasionally there

are areas that are
unclear.
(2.8 – 3.19)
explains reasoning;
draws unwarranted
conclusions. At
times, the reader
must attempt to
determine the
author's train of
thought.
(2.4 – 2.79)
material.
(0 – 2.39)
Application of
Resources
4 points
Arguments or

positions are well-
supported with
evidence from the
readings/experienc
e; ideas go beyond
the course
material and
recognize
implications and
extensions of the
material and
concepts.
(3.6 - 4)
3.4 points
Arguments or
positions are mostly
supported by

evidence from the
readings and course
content; ideas
presented
demonstrate
understanding of
the material and
concepts.
(3.2 – 3.59)
3 points
Arguments are
more often based
on opinion or
unclear views than
on position
grounded in the
readings of
material or

external sources of
material.
(2.8 – 3.19)
2.6 points
Arguments are
frequently illogical
and
unsubstantiated;
Limited use of
facts in case study
and essential
information
presented in
resources; May
resort to ad
hominem attacks
on the author

instead of making
meaningful
0 points
Arguments lack
meaningful
explanation or
support of
ideas. Does not
provide facts
presented in case
study.
(0 – 2.39)
application of the
material.
(2.4 – 2.79)
Attention to
Instructions

2 points
demonstrated full
understanding of
requirements
responded to each
aspect of
assignment
(1.8 – 2.0)
1.7 points
demonstrated
understanding of
requirements;
missed one minor
aspect of
assignment
(1.6 – 1.79)
1.5 points

demonstrated
some
understanding of
requirements;
missed a key
element or two
minor aspects of
assignment
(1.4 – 1.59)
1.3 points
failed to show a
firm understanding
of requirements;
missed two key
elements or
several minor
aspects of

assignment
(1.2 – 1.39)
0 points
did not
demonstrate
understanding of
assignment
requirements
(0 – 1.19)
Writing
Mechanics
2 points
Strictly adheres to
standard usage
rules of written
English, including
but not limited to
capitalization,

punctuation, and
spelling. No errors
1.7 points
Adheres to standard
usage of
mechanics: conventi
ons of written
English, including
capitalization,
punctuation, and
spelling. One to
1.5 points
Minimally adheres
to standard usage
rules of
mechanics: conven
tions of English,

including
capitalization,
punctuation, and
1.3 points
Does not adhere to
standard usage
rules of
mechanics: conven
tions of written
English, including
capitalization,
punctuation, and
0 points
Does not adhere
to standard usage
rules of
mechanics: conve

ntions of written
English largely
incomprehensible
and errors are too
found. No jargon
used.
(1.8 – 2.0)
three errors found.
(1.6 – 1.79)
spelling. Four to 10
errors found.
(1.4 – 1.59)
spelling. More
than 10 errors
found.
(1.2 – 1.39)
plentiful to count.

(0 – 1.19)
APA Style
(6th ed.)
1 point
No APA style errors;
Proper citation of
source material is
used throughout
paper. Reference
titles follow APA
with only the first
word, the first word
after a colon and
proper nouns
capitalized.
(0.9 - 1)
0.85 points

Attempts in-text
citations and
reference list but
one or two APA style
errors noted.
(0.8 – 0.89)
0.75 points
Attempts in-text
citations and
reference lists;
APA style errors
are noted;
inconsistencies in
citation usage are
noted throughout
document.
(0.7 – 0.79)
0.65 points

Attempts either
in-text citations or
reference list but
omits the other.
(0.6 – 0.69)
0 points
No attempt at
APA style.
(0 – 0.59)
Overall Score
Outstanding
18 or more
Superior
16 or more
Good

14 or more
Substandard
12 or more
Failure
0 or more
Assignment 2: Mini-Management Plan (Week 5)
Purpose:
In the second assignment, students will complete a mini-
management plan that demonstrates how an organization
operates on a day-
to-day basis as well as over the long run. This assignment helps
students develop the skills necessary to assess a management
situation and to write a report based on the findings
A management plan is a report that includes numerous sections
that cover various aspects of the business.
es to develop strategies,

goals, and objectives in order to enhance performance and
sustainability
effective and efficient attainment of organizational goals
eristics of decision making and
indicate the range and types of decisions a manager makes
Instructions:
In this assignment students will take the role of the Vice
President of Operation creating a mini-management plan that
focuses on
those aspects of the business related to planning and organizing.
As Vice President of Operations, Joseph Jackson, the leader of
Cyber
Software, Inc., has asked you to help him solve his
organizational problems. This mini-management plan is a
professionally written
document that will be given to Joseph Jackson.
In writing the plan, you must use the terminology learned in the
course. Since Joe Jackson is quite knowledgeable, you are not
defining terms using a dictionary but you will explain and
describe concepts and ideas so Joseph Jackson understands what
you mean,
why the ideas are important to the business and how to
implement the proposed plan. The plan is not one in which the
Vice President

of Operations tells Joseph Jackson that he should do this or do
that or he needs to or will do this or do that but one that is
presented in
an action-oriented manner. Students are expected to make
connections between the facts of the case study and concepts,
theories, and
ideas presented in the course readings.
The mini-management plan will structure the entire company
and will cover Joseph Jackson’s organization’s mission, vision,
structure
and culture.
Content.
Step 2: Create a Word or Rich Text Format (RTF) document.
This mini-management plan should be presented in a
professional
manner using single space, double-spaced between paragraphs.
The final product will be between 5-7 pages in length excluding
the
title page, diagrams and reference page.
Step 3: Title page with your name, the course name, the date,
and the instructor’s name.
Step 4: Since students are probably not familiar with writing a

management plan, the following resources have been provided
to assist
in writing the plan.
1. How to Write a Management Plan
http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-
contents/leadership/effective-manager/management-plan/main
1. Management Plan Example
https://wakenature.wordpress.com/resources/management-plan-
examples/
me, my, we,
person,
view this link:
If any
associated

reviewing
this link:
course.
http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/leadership/effective-
manager/management-plan/main
https://wakenature.wordpress.com/resources/management-plan-
examples/
Step 10: Read critically and analyze the case study provided
under Week 5 content. Notate the key points in the case study.
Step 11: Create the introductory paragraph.
The introductory paragraph is the first paragraph of the paper
but is typically written after writing the body of the paper
(Questions
students responded to above). View this website to learn how
to write an introductory

paragraph:
Step 12: Respond to the required elements of the assignment.
Be clear and concise in the writing and make sure the questions
are
comprehensively answered.
1. Provide a brief management history of Cyber Software, Inc.;
2. Help Joe Jackson by proposing a new mission statement and
vision statement that align with what Joseph Jackson now
envisions for his company;
1. Explain why the new mission statement and vision statement
are appropriate for Cyber Software, Inc.;
2. Discuss other aspects of the planning phase that impacts
Cyber Software, Inc.;
3. Create an organizational structure that aligns with the vision
of Joseph Jackson
1. Structure the entire company;
2. Explain why the structure is the most appropriate structure
for Cyber Software, Inc.;
3. Discuss why other structures are not appropriate;
4. Illustrate and discuss the new structure with an
organizational chart with names, job titles, and direct reports.
Be
creative but make sure the jobs fit into the allotted budget;
4. Create an organizational culture that aligns with the vision of
Joseph Jackson and his new organization structure;
5. Explain how the new organizational structure and culture

affect the planning and organizing facet of Joe’s business and
prevent future mishaps;
6. Use at least four references from the course material and at
least three outside resources.
paper;
improvement.
Criteria
Outstanding

Superior
Good
Substandard
Failure
Content:
Brief History
of Company
0.63 points
Brief history
of company is
described
accurately and
comprehensive
ly delivering all
relevant
information.
(0..567 - 0.63)

0.5355 points
Brief history of
company is
described
sufficiently but is
not completely
accurate or
comprehensive
and is missing
relevant
information.
(0.504 - 0.566)
0.4725 points
Brief history of
company is
described but key
points are missing or

needs more
clarification on some
aspects.
(0.441 - 0.5039)
0.4095 points
Brief history is discussed
but does not fit the facts
provided or inaccurate
statements made.
(0.378 - 0.4409)
0 points
Brief
history not disc
ussed.
(0 – 0.3779)
Content:
Vision and
Mission

1.05 points
0.8925 points
0.7875 points
0.6825 points
0 points
Mission and
vision
statements
align with what
is envisioned;
why
appropriate is
explained and
planning
is described

accurately and
comprehensive
ly delivering all
relevant
information.
(0.945 - 1.05)
Mission and vision
statements align
with what is
envisioned; why
appropriate is
explained and
planning is
described
sufficiently but is
not completely
accurate or
comprehensive

and is missing
relevant
information.
(0.84 - 0.9449)
Mission and vision
statements align
with what is
envisioned; why
appropriate is
explained and
planning is described
but key points are
missing or needs
more clarification on
some aspects.
(0.735 - 0.839)
Mission and vision
statements align with what

is envisioned; why
appropriate is explained
and planning is not
fully discussed; does does
not fit the facts provided
or inaccurate statements
made.
(0.63 - 0.7349)
Mission and
vision
statements align
with what is
envisioned; why
appropriate is
explained and
planning is not
identified and
there is no

discussion.
(0 – 0.629)
Content:
Organizationa
l Structure
1.47 points
Organizational
structure for
entire
company is
created, why
the structure
is appropriate
1.2495 points
Organizational
structure for
entire company is
created, why the

structure is
appropriate
and why other
1.1025 points
Organizational
structure is created
for entire company,
why the structure is
appropriate is
explained and why
other structures are
0.95555 points
Organizational structure
for entire company, why
the structure is
appropriate and why other
structures are not

appropriate are not all
described; does not fit the
0 points
Organizational
structure is
created for entire
company, why
the structure is
appropriate, and
why other
structures are
and why other
structures are
not
appropriate
are described
accurately and
comprehensive
ly delivering all
relevant

information.
(1.323 - 1.47)
structures are not
appropriate are d
escribed
sufficiently but is
not completely
accurate or
comprehensive
and is missing
relevant
information.
(1.176 - 1.322)
not
appropriate are desc
ribed but key points
are missing or needs

some aspects.
(1.029 - 1.175)
facts provided or several
inaccurate statements are
made.
(0.882 - 1.028)
not discussed.
(0 – 0.881)
Content:
Organizationa
l Chart
1.47 points
Organizational
chart is
created, the
structure,
roles, and
people are

discussed
accurately and
comprehensive
ly delivering all
relevant
information.
1.2495 points
Organizational
chart is created,
the structure,
roles, and people
are
discussed sufficie
ntly but is not
completely
accurate or
comprehensive
and is missing

relevant
1.1025 points
Organizational
chart is created, the
structure, roles, and
people are
discussed but key
points are missing or
needs more
aspects.
(1.029 - 1.175)
0.95555 points
Organizational chart is
created, the structure,
roles, and people
are discussed but does

not fit the facts provided;
may have inaccurate
information or statements
made or not all of the
required elements are
presented.
(0.882 - 1.028)
0 points
Organizational
chart, the
structure, roles,
and people
are not
presented
or discussed.
(0 – 0.881)
(1.323 - 1.47) information.
(1.176 - 1.322)
Content:
Organizationa

l Culture
1.47 points
Organizational
culture that
aligns with
vision is
created and
described
accurately and
comprehensive
ly delivering all
relevant
information.
(1.323 - 1.47)
1.2495 points
Organizational
culture that aligns

with vision is
created
and described
sufficiently but is
not completely
accurate or
comprehensive
and is missing
relevant
information.
(1.176 - 1.322)
1.1025 points
Organizational
culture that aligns
with vision is created
and described but
key points are
missing or needs

some aspects.
(1.029 - 1.175)
0.95555 points
Organizational culture
is created and but does
not align with vision or
what is provided
has inaccurate information
or statements.
(0.882 - 1.028)
0 points
Organizational
culture is not
provided or
discussed.
(0 – 0.881)
Content:
How new

organizational
structure and
culture affect
the planning
and
organizing
facet of
business and
1.26 points
How new
organizational
structure and
culture affect
the planning
1.071 points
How new
organizational
structure and
culture affect the
planning and
0.945 points

How new
organizational
structure and
culture affect the
planning and
0.819 points
How new organizational
structure and culture
affect the planning and
organizing of business and
prevent future
0 points
How new
organizational
structure and
culture affect the
planning and
organizing of

prevent future
mishaps
and organizing
of business
and prevent
future mishaps
are described
accurately and
comprehensive
ly delivering all
relevant
information.
(1.134 - 1.26)
organizing of
business and
prevent future
mishaps are descr
ibed sufficiently

but is not
completely
accurate or
comprehensive
and is missing
relevant
information.
(1.008 - 1.133)
organizing of
business and prevent
future
mishaps are describe
d but key points are
missing or needs
some aspects.
(0.882 - 1.007)
mishaps are

superficially discussed; ha
s inaccurate information or
statements.
(0.756 - 0.8819)
business and
prevent future
mishaps is not
discussed.
(0 – 0.755)
Critical
Thinking/Rea
soning
4.2 points
Concepts and
ideas are fully
developed.
Thinking is
consistent in
accurately
interpreting

questions and
material/provi
des solid
assumptions,
3.57 points
Concepts and
ideas are
developed. Thinkin
g is mostly
consistent in
accurately
interpreting
questions and
material/ provides
good assumptions,
reasoning and
3.15 points

Concepts and ideas
are mostly developed
but may need
aspects of thinking,
reasoning or
evaluation. Conclusi
ons are
drawn. Reader
follows the author’s
logic but occasionally
2.73 points
Concepts and ideas are not
cohesive. Misinterprets
questions or material;
ignores or superficially
evaluates, justifies little
and seldom explains

reasoning; draws
unwarranted
conclusions. At times, the
reader must attempt to
determine the author's
0 points
Concepts and
ideas are not
fully developed
or presented in
a cohesive
manner.
Misinterprets
questions or
material.
(0 – 2.51)

reasoning and
evaluation with
sound
conclusions.
Reader can
easily follow
the author's
logic and
reasoning.
(3.78 - 4.2)
evaluation with
sound
conclusions. Reade
r can easily follow
the author's logic
and reasoning.
(3.36 – 3.77 )
there are areas that

are unclear.
(2.94 – 3.35)
train of thought.
(2.52 – 2.93)
Application
of Resources
4.2 points
Arguments or
positions are
well-supported
with evidence
from the
readings/expe
rience; ideas
go beyond the
course
material and
recognize

implications
and extensions
of the
3.57 points
Arguments or
positions are
mostly supported
by evidence from
the readings and
course content;
ideas presented
demonstrate
understanding of
the material and
concepts.
(3.36 – 3.77)
3.15 points

Arguments are more
often based on
opinion or unclear
views than on
position grounded in
the readings of
material or external
sources of material.
(2.94 – 3.35)
2.73 points
Arguments are frequently
illogical and
unsubstantiated; Limited
use of facts in case study
and essential information
presented in resources;
May resort to ad hominem
attacks on the author

instead of making
meaningful application of
the material.
(2.52 – 2.93)
0 points
Arguments lack
meaningful
explanation or
support of
ideas. Does not
provide facts
presented in
case study.
(0 – 2.51)
material and
concepts.

(3.78 - 4.2)
Attention to
Instructions
2.1 points
demonstrated
full
understanding
of
requirements
responded to
each aspect of
assignment
(1.89 – 2.1)
1.785 points
demonstrated
understanding of
requirements;
missed one minor

aspect of
assignment
(1.68 – 1.88)
1.575 points
demonstrated some
understanding of
requirements; missed
a key element or two
minor aspects of
assignment
(1.47 – 1.67)
1.365 points
failed to show a firm
understanding of
requirements; missed two
key elements or several
minor aspects of

assignment
(1.26 – 1.46)
0 points
did not
demonstrate
understanding
of assignment
requirements
(0 – 1.25)
Writing
Mechanics
2.1 points
Strictly
adheres to
standard
usage rules of
written

English,
including but
not limited to
1.785 points
Adheres to
standard usage of
mechanics: conve
ntions of written
English, including
capitalization,
punctuation, and
spelling. One to
1.575 points
Minimally adheres to
standard usage rules
of
mechanics: conventi

ons of English,
including
capitalization,
punctuation, and
1.365 points
Does not adhere to
standard usage rules of
mechanics: conventions of
written English, including
capitalization, punctuation,
and spelling. More than 10
errors found.
0 points
Does not adhere
to standard
usage rules of
mechanics: conv

entions of
written English
largely
incomprehensibl
capitalization,
punctuation,
and
spelling. No
errors
found. No
jargon used.
(1.89 – 2.1)
three errors
found.
(1.68 – 1.88)
spelling. Four to 10
errors found.

(1.47 – 1.67)
(1.26 – 1.46) e and errors are
too plentiful to
count.
(0 – 1.25)
APA Style
(6th ed.)
1.05 points
No APA style
errors; Proper
citation of
source material
is used
throughout
paper.
Reference
titles follow
APA with only

the first word,
the first word
after a colon
and proper
nouns
0.8925 points
Attempts in-text
citations and
reference list but
one or two APA
style errors
noted.
(0.84 – 0.944)
0.7875 points
Attempts in-text
citations and
reference lists; APA

style errors are
noted;
inconsistencies in
citation usage are
noted throughout
document.
(0.735 – 0.839)
0.6825 points
Attempts either in-text
citations or reference list
but omits the other.
(0.63 – 0.734)
0 points
No attempt at
APA style.
(0 – 0.629)

capitalized.
(0.945 - 1.05)
Overall
Score
Outstanding
18.9 or more
Superior
16.8 or more
Good
14.7 or more
Substandard
12.6 or more
Failure
0 or more
Assignment 3: Applying the P-O-L-C (Week 8)
Purpose:

The third assignment, a consultancy report, provides students
with the ability to demonstrate that they have mastered the
course
content and can apply theories, concepts and ideas learned
throughout the course to a situation that emulates a real world
situation. Students will read the case study that focuses on the
four functions of management: planning, organizing, leading
and
controlling (P-O-L-C) and respond to the required elements of
the assignment.
Writing reports in business is commonplace so writing a
consultancy report provides students the opportunity to
demonstrate a skill
that employers are looking for from an employee.
rate management theories and principles into
goals, and objectives in order to enhance performance and
sustainability
s for the
effective and efficient attainment of organizational goals
vision, motivating and empowering others, and creating a
culture
of ethical decision-making and innovation

es and assess outcomes against plans and
standards to improve organizational effectiveness
indicate the range and types of decisions a manager makes
Instructions:
You have been hired as a consultant to help Mike Davis and his
family to solve the problems with his business both day-to-day
and
over the long term (strategically). You will create a
consultancy report that covers the four functions of
management. In creating the
consultancy report, you must also demonstrate how the four
functions of management are interrelated showing how issues in
one
function impact other functions.
In speaking with Mike, Ethan and Daisy, you already know the
following about the business owners:
1. failed to develop or share a mission statement;
2. failed to determine the best way to organize resources,
including personnel;
3. underestimates the importance of recruitment, job design and
descriptions, and training;
4. assumed that motivation will occur naturally;
5. fails to define standards and other measurable outcomes;
6. ignored negative information;

7. delayed actions to improve organizational outcomes.
Be succinct in your writing but persuasive so that the
recommendations will have positive outcomes for the business.
Students are not using buzz-word and are not defining terms
using a dictionary. Students are expected to present the
material in a
professional manner describing and explaining to the owners.
As a consultant, you should be secure in your presentation to
Mike,
Ethan and Daisy. Avoid telling the owners that they should do
this or must do that but write in an action-oriented manner.
Students
are expected to make connections between the facts of the case
study and concepts, theories, and ideas presented in the course
material.
Content.
Step 2: Create a Word or Rich Text Format (RTF) document.
This consultancy plan should be presented in a professional
manner
using single space, double-spaced between paragraphs. The
final product will be between 6-8 pages in length excluding the
title page,
diagrams and reference page.
Step 3: Title page with your name, the course name, the date,

and the instructor’s name.
Step 4: Since students are probably not familiar with writing a
consultancy report, the following resources have been provided
to
assist in writing the report.
1. How to Write a Consultancy Report
http://www.slideshare.net/AisyahBagarib/spca-team-
consultancy-report
me, my, we,
person,
view this link:
If any
associated

reviewing
this link:
course
readings with a wide array of readings used.
Step 10: Read critically and analyze the case study provided
under Week 5 content. Notate the key points in the case study.
Step 11: Create an executive summary. Although a report
must be complete when presenting to a client, the expectation is
that there
is an executive summary so that the client can read quickly the
main features of the report. The executive summary should be
written
in a way that makes the client want to read more so it must have
enough information to see the potential behind the
recommendations
without having to read the entire report.
So you aren’t sure how to write the executive summary. Check
out this resource to help you write the summary:

How to Write an Executive Summary:
http://articles.bplans.com/writing-an-executive-summary/
http://www.slideshare.net/AisyahBagarib/spca-team-
consultancy-report
http://articles.bplans.com/writing-an-executive-summary/
Step 12: Respond to the required elements of the assignment.
Be clear and concise in the writing and make sure the questions
are
comprehensively answered.
the business and identify specific areas of strengths and
weaknesses
of the business as it relates to the components of the P-O-L-C.
In completing this section, do not create a heading for each
element of the P-O-L-C but write from the perspective of the
consultant discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the
business;
hierarchy, collaborative management or collective management)
and
explain why the selected model is most appropriate for Outdoor
Adventure Paintball Park;

velop roles and responsibility of the owners and employees
(Be creative in completing this task); Discuss why these
positions are necessary to the business;
relation to the management model;
management of Outdoor Adventure Paintball Park. Cover all
aspects of the
P-O-L-C. This area of the paper specifically addresses the areas
of strengths and weaknesses identified above and puts in
place a plan for the short and long –term success of the
business;
Paintball Park align its business activities to the vision and
strategy of the organization, improves communication and
monitors performance against goals;
course by applying theories and concepts. Be sure to support
your
reasoning.

f the
paper;
improvement.
Criteria
Outstanding
Superior
Good
Substandard
Failure
Content:

Strengths as
They Relate to
POLC
1.75 points
Business is assessed
- strengths of
business as related
to POLC are
identified
and explained clearly
, accurately and
comprehensively
delivering all
relevant information.
(1.575 - 1.75)
1.4875 points
Business is assessed -
strengths of business

as related to POLC are
identified
andexplained accurately
but could be more
comprehensive or
clearer with more
(1.4 - 1.575)
1.3125 points
Business is
assessed -
strengths of
business as related
to POLC are
identified
and explained but
needs more
clarification on
some aspects.
(1.225 - 1.39)
1.1375 points
Business is

assessed -
strengths of
business as
related to
POLC could be
more completely
identified or
there are
significant
omissions in the
analysis.
(1.05 - 1.224)
0 points
Business is
assessed -
strengths of
business as
related to
POLC are not
discussed.

(0 - 1.049)
Content:
Weaknesses as
They Relate to
POLC
1.75 points
Business is assessed
- weaknesses of
business as related
to POLC are
identified
1.4875 points
Business is assessed -
weaknesses of business
as related to POLC are
identified and
1.3125 points

Business is
assessed -
weaknesses of
business as related
to POLC are
identified
1.1375 points
Business is
assessed -
weaknesses of
business as
related to
0 points
Business is
assessed -
weaknesses of
business as
related to
POLC are not
, accurately and

comprehensively
delivering all
(1.575 - 1.75)
but could be more
comprehensive or
clearer with more
(1.4 - 1.575)
and explained but
needs more
clarification on
some aspects.
(1.225 - 1.39)
POLC could be
more completely
identified or
there are
significant
omissions in the

analysis.
(1.05 - 1.224)
discussed.
(0 - 1.049)
Content:
Management
Model/Explains
Why it is Most
Appropriate
1.75 points
Management
model selected and
why it is most
appropriately
explained clearly,
accurately and
comprehensively
delivering all

(1.575 - 1.75)
1.4875 points
Management
model selected and why
it is most
appropriately explained
accurately but could be
more comprehensive or
clearer with more
(1.4 - 1.575)
1.3125 points
Management
model selected and
why it is most
appropriately explai
ned but needs more
clarification on
some aspects.
(1.225 - 1.39)

1.1375 points
Management
model selected bu
t why it is most
appropriately not
explained. Key
points missing.
(1.05 - 1.224)
0 points
Management
model selected a
nd why it is most
appropriately are
not discussed.
(0 - 1.049)
Content: Roles
and
Responsibilities
1.75 points
Roles and

responsibilities of
owners and
1.4875 points
Roles and
responsibilities of
owners and
1.3125 points
Roles and
responsibilities of
owners and
employees are
1.1375 points
Roles and
responsibilities of
owners and
0 points
Roles and
responsibilities of

owners and
employees are
employees
are identified
, accurately and
comprehensively
delivering all
(1.575 - 1.75)
employees are
identified and
but could be more
comprehensive or
clearer with more
(1.4 - 1.575)

identified
and explained but
needs more
clarification on
some aspects.
(1.225 - 1.39)
employees could
be more
completely
identified or
there are
significant
omissions in the
analysis/ Roles or
responsibilities
discussed but not
both/Key points
missing.
(1.05 - 1.224)
not discussed.

(0 - 1.049)
Content:
Communication/
Decision Making
1.75 points
Communication and
decision making
are explained clearly
, accurately and
comprehensively
delivering all
(1.575 - 1.75)
1.4875 points
Communication and
decision making
are explained accuratel
y but could be more

comprehensive or
clearer with more
(1.4 - 1.575)
1.3125 points
Communication and
decision making are
explained but needs
some aspects.
(1.225 - 1.39)
1.1375 points
Communication
and decision
making could be
more completely
explained or
there are
significant

omissions in the
analysis/ Roles or
responsibilities
discussed but not
both/Key points
0 points
Communication
and decision
making are not
discussed.
(0 - 1.049)
missing.
(1.05 - 1.224)
Content:
Recommendation
s for Improving
Management
1.75 points
Recommendations

for improving
management are
identified
, accurately and
comprehensively
delivering all
relevant information
and are and are
directly related to
the weaknesses
identified in the
paper.
(1.575 - 1.75)
1.4875 points
Recommendations for
improving

management are
identified and
but could be more
comprehensive or
clearer with more
relevant
information/are directly
related to the
weaknesses identified in
the paper.
(1.575 - 1.75)
(1.4 - 1.575)
1.3125 points
Recommendations
for improving
management are
identified
and explained but
needs more
clarification on
some aspects or
are not directly
related to the

weaknesses
identified in the
paper.
(1.225 - 1.39)
1.1375 points
Recommendations
for improving
management could
be more
completely
identified or
there are
significant
omissions in the
analysis/recomme
ndations to not
relate to the
weaknesses.
(1.05 - 1.224)

0 points
Recommendatio
ns are not
discussed.
(0 - 1.049)
Content:
Balanced
Scorecard
1.75 points
Balanced scorecard
is correctly
created and explaine
d clearly, accurately
1.4875 points
Balanced scorecard is
created somewhat
correctly and explained
but could be more

1.3125 points
Balanced scorecard
is created with
some correct
elements
and somewhat expl
1.1375 points
Balanced
scorecard is
attempted but
not correctly
0 points
Balanced
scorecard not
created or
explained.
and comprehensively
delivering all

(1.575 - 1.75)
comprehensive or
clearer with more
(1.4 - 1.575)
ained but needs
some aspects.
(1.225 - 1.39)
depicted or not
explained. Key
elements of a
balanced
scorecard are
missing.
(1.05 - 1.224)
(0 - 1.049)
Critical
Thinking/Reasoni
ng

7 points
Concepts and ideas are
fully developed.
Thinking is consistent in
accurately interpreting
questions and
material/provides solid
assumptions, reasoning
and evaluation with
sound conclusions.
Reader can easily follow
the author's logic and
reasoning.
(6.3 - 7)
5.95 points
Concepts and ideas are
developed. Thinking is

mostly consistent in
accurately interpreting
questions and material/
provides good assumptions,
reasoning and evaluation
with sound
conclusions. Reader can
easily follow the author's
logic and reasoning.
(5.6 - 6.29 )
5.25 points
Concepts and ideas
are mostly developed
but may need
aspects of thinking,
reasoning or
evaluation. Conclusio

ns are drawn. Reader
follows the author’s
logic but occasionally
there are areas that
are unclear.
(4.9 - 5.59)
4.55 points
Concepts and ideas
are not
cohesive. Misinterp
rets questions or
material; ignores or
superficially
evaluates, justifies
little and seldom
explains reasoning;
draws unwarranted

conclusions. At
times, the reader
must attempt to
determine the
author's train of
thought.
(4.2 - 4.89)
0 points
Concepts and ideas
are not fully
developed or
presented in a
cohesive manner.
Misinterprets
questions or
material.
(0 – 4.19)
Application of

Resources
7 points
5.95 points
5.25 points
4.55 points
0 points
Arguments or
positions are well-
supported with
evidence from the
readings/experience;
ideas go beyond the
course material and
recognize
implications and

extensions of the
material and
concepts.
(6.3 - 7)
Arguments or positions
are mostly supported by
evidence from the
readings and course
content; ideas
presented demonstrate
understanding of the
material and concepts.
(5.6 - 6.29)
Arguments are
more often based
on opinion or
unclear views than
on position

grounded in the
readings of
material or
external sources
of material.
(4.9 - 5.59)
Arguments are
frequently
illogical and
unsubstantiated;
Limited use of
facts in case
study and
essential
information
presented in
resources; May
resort to ad

hominem attacks
on the author
instead of making
meaningful
application of the
material.
(4.2 - 4.89)
Arguments lack
meaningful
explanation or
support of
ideas. Does not
provide facts
presented in
case study.
(0 – 4.19)
Attention to
Instructions

3.5 points
demonstrated full
understanding of
requirements
responded to each
2.975 points
demonstrated
understanding of
requirements; missed
one minor aspect of
2.625 points
demonstrated
some
understanding of
requirements;
missed a key
2.275 points

failed to show a
firm
understanding of
requirements;
missed two key
0 points
did not
demonstrate
understanding
of assignment
aspect of assignment
(3.15 - 3.5)
assignment
(2.8 - 3.149)
element or two
minor aspects of

assignment
(2.45 - 2.79)
elements or
several minor
aspects of
assignment
(2.1 - 2.449)
requirements
(0 – 2.09)
Writing
Mechanics
3.5 points
Strictly adheres to
standard usage rules
of written English,
including but not
limited to
capitalization,

punctuation, and
spelling. No errors
found. No jargon
used.
(3.15 - 3.5)
2.975 points
Adheres to standard
usage of
mechanics: conventions
of written English,
including capitalization,
punctuation, and
spelling. One to three
errors found.
(2.8 - 3.149)
2.625 points
Minimally adheres

to standard usage
rules of
mechanics: conven
tions of English,
including
capitalization,
punctuation, and
spelling. Four to
10 errors found.
(2.45 - 2.79)
2.275 points
Does not adhere
to standard usage
rules of
mechanics: conve
ntions of written
English, including

capitalization,
punctuation, and
spelling. More
than 10 errors
found.
(2.1 - 2.449)
0 points
Does not adhere
to standard
usage rules of
mechanics: conv
entions of
written English
largely
incomprehensibl
e and errors are
too plentiful to
count.

(0 – 2.09)
APA Style (6th
ed.)
1.75 points
No APA style errors;
Proper citation of
source material is
used throughout
paper. Reference
1.4875 points
Attempts in-text
citations and reference
list but one or two APA
1.3125 points
Attempts in-text
citations and
reference lists; APA

style errors are
noted; inconsistencies
1.1375 points
Attempts either in-
text citations or
reference list but
omits the other.
0 points
No attempt at APA
style.
(0 – 1.049)
titles follow APA with
only the first word,
the first word after
a colon and proper
nouns capitalized.

(1.575 - 1.75)
style errors noted.
(1.4 - 1.574)
in citation usage are
noted throughout
document.
(1.225 - 1.39)
(1.05 – 1.224)
Overall Score
Outstanding
31.5 or more
Good
28 or more
Substandard
24.5 or more
Superior

Persuasion writing assignment (900 – 1500 words)About hoax pictu.docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Persuasion writing assignment (900 – 1500 words)About hoax pictu.docx

Similar to Persuasion writing assignment (900 – 1500 words)About hoax pictu.docx (7)

More from herbertwilson5999

More from herbertwilson5999 (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Persuasion writing assignment (900 – 1500 words)About hoax pictu.docx