The document discusses performance appraisal, including various methods of appraising employee performance such as work standards approach, critical incident appraisal, checklist, essay appraisal, graphic rating scale, behaviorally anchored rating scale, ranking methods, and forced-choice rating. It also covers goal setting or management by objectives, sources of performance information, common errors in performance appraisal like halo error and leniency error, and ways to overcome errors such as using multiple criteria and evaluators.
Value Analysis (VA) is a tool (technique or method) that is used for improving the value of a product or a process of understanding its constituent components and their associated costs. It aims at finding improvements to the components by reducing their cost and increasing the value of the functions of a product or a service.
A critical advantage to using a VA is its potential for reducing costs, which is a benefit that permeates all advantages of the system.
A VA breaks-down a product or service into components, it enables you to analyze each component on its own, evaluating its features and functions in detail efficiency and effectiveness.
Value Analysis (VA) is a tool (technique or method) that is used for improving the value of a product or a process of understanding its constituent components and their associated costs. It aims at finding improvements to the components by reducing their cost and increasing the value of the functions of a product or a service.
A critical advantage to using a VA is its potential for reducing costs, which is a benefit that permeates all advantages of the system.
A VA breaks-down a product or service into components, it enables you to analyze each component on its own, evaluating its features and functions in detail efficiency and effectiveness.
This Presentation Is About Value Engineering & It Covers Following Topics ;
1. Concept Of Value Engineering
2. History Of Value Engineering
3. Aims/Purposes/Objectives Of Value Engineering
4. Steps/Phases/Procedures Of Value Engineering
Job analysis is the process that identifies tasks, duties, responsibilities, required qualifications, skill and knowledge etc. ... Job design mainly focuses on work division and effective performance of tasks and job completion whereas Job analysis is about effective and appropriate selection of candidates
Value Analysis and Value Engineering in Material ManagementManoj Abraham
See the doc file(already uploaded) to see the contends in detail...copy n paste the beolw link...
http://www.slideshare.net/ManojAbraham/v-alue-analysis
Job analysis- what it is and the methods to complete it. We did not have the resources to complete the job analysis, however we described the process and discuss limitations of this approach.
This Presentation Is About Value Engineering & It Covers Following Topics ;
1. Concept Of Value Engineering
2. History Of Value Engineering
3. Aims/Purposes/Objectives Of Value Engineering
4. Steps/Phases/Procedures Of Value Engineering
Job analysis is the process that identifies tasks, duties, responsibilities, required qualifications, skill and knowledge etc. ... Job design mainly focuses on work division and effective performance of tasks and job completion whereas Job analysis is about effective and appropriate selection of candidates
Value Analysis and Value Engineering in Material ManagementManoj Abraham
See the doc file(already uploaded) to see the contends in detail...copy n paste the beolw link...
http://www.slideshare.net/ManojAbraham/v-alue-analysis
Job analysis- what it is and the methods to complete it. We did not have the resources to complete the job analysis, however we described the process and discuss limitations of this approach.
Performance Appraisal Dr.Rangappa.S.Ashi Associate Professor SDM Institute of...rangappa
Performance Evaluation/ Performance Appraisal is the process of evaluating the performance & progress of an employee of a group of employees on a given job & his/her potential for future development.
Senior Project and Engineering Leader Jim Smith.pdfJim Smith
I am a Project and Engineering Leader with extensive experience as a Business Operations Leader, Technical Project Manager, Engineering Manager and Operations Experience for Domestic and International companies such as Electrolux, Carrier, and Deutz. I have developed new products using Stage Gate development/MS Project/JIRA, for the pro-duction of Medical Equipment, Large Commercial Refrigeration Systems, Appliances, HVAC, and Diesel engines.
My experience includes:
Managed customized engineered refrigeration system projects with high voltage power panels from quote to ship, coordinating actions between electrical engineering, mechanical design and application engineering, purchasing, production, test, quality assurance and field installation. Managed projects $25k to $1M per project; 4-8 per month. (Hussmann refrigeration)
Successfully developed the $15-20M yearly corporate capital strategy for manufacturing, with the Executive Team and key stakeholders. Created project scope and specifications, business case, ROI, managed project plans with key personnel for nine consumer product manufacturing and distribution sites; to support the company’s strategic sales plan.
Over 15 years of experience managing and developing cost improvement projects with key Stakeholders, site Manufacturing Engineers, Mechanical Engineers, Maintenance, and facility support personnel to optimize pro-duction operations, safety, EHS, and new product development. (BioLab, Deutz, Caire)
Experience working as a Technical Manager developing new products with chemical engineers and packaging engineers to enhance and reduce the cost of retail products. I have led the activities of multiple engineering groups with diverse backgrounds.
Great experience managing the product development of products which utilize complex electrical controls, high voltage power panels, product testing, and commissioning.
Created project scope, business case, ROI for multiple capital projects to support electrotechnical assembly and CPG goods. Identified project cost, risk, success criteria, and performed equipment qualifications. (Carrier, Electrolux, Biolab, Price, Hussmann)
Created detailed projects plans using MS Project, Gant charts in excel, and updated new product development in Jira for stakeholders and project team members including critical path.
Great knowledge of ISO9001, NFPA, OSHA regulations.
User level knowledge of MRP/SAP, MS Project, Powerpoint, Visio, Mastercontrol, JIRA, Power BI and Tableau.
I appreciate your consideration, and look forward to discussing this role with you, and how I can lead your company’s growth and profitability. I can be contacted via LinkedIn via phone or E Mail.
Jim Smith
678-993-7195
jimsmith30024@gmail.com
Artificial intelligence (AI) offers new opportunities to radically reinvent the way we do business. This study explores how CEOs and top decision makers around the world are responding to the transformative potential of AI.
The case study discusses the potential of drone delivery and the challenges that need to be addressed before it becomes widespread.
Key takeaways:
Drone delivery is in its early stages: Amazon's trial in the UK demonstrates the potential for faster deliveries, but it's still limited by regulations and technology.
Regulations are a major hurdle: Safety concerns around drone collisions with airplanes and people have led to restrictions on flight height and location.
Other challenges exist: Who will use drone delivery the most? Is it cost-effective compared to traditional delivery trucks?
Discussion questions:
Managerial challenges: Integrating drones requires planning for new infrastructure, training staff, and navigating regulations. There are also marketing and recruitment considerations specific to this technology.
External forces vary by country: Regulations, consumer acceptance, and infrastructure all differ between countries.
Demographics matter: Younger generations might be more receptive to drone delivery, while older populations might have concerns.
Stakeholders for Amazon: Customers, regulators, aviation authorities, and competitors are all stakeholders. Regulators likely hold the greatest influence as they determine the feasibility of drone delivery.
The Team Member and Guest Experience - Lead and Take Care of your restaurant team. They are the people closest to and delivering Hospitality to your paying Guests!
Make the call, and we can assist you.
408-784-7371
Foodservice Consulting + Design
Oprah Winfrey: A Leader in Media, Philanthropy, and Empowerment | CIO Women M...CIOWomenMagazine
This person is none other than Oprah Winfrey, a highly influential figure whose impact extends beyond television. This article will delve into the remarkable life and lasting legacy of Oprah. Her story serves as a reminder of the importance of perseverance, compassion, and firm determination.
2. • METHODS OF APPRAISAL
• GOAL SETTING OR MBO
• SOURCES OF PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
• ERRORS IN PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
• OVERCOMING ERRORS IN PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
Topics to be
discussed
3. M E T H O D S O F A P P R A I S A L
Various methods of appraising employee performance consist of the
following:
• Work standards approach
• Critical-incident appraisal
• Checklist
• Essay appraisal
• Graphic rating scale
• Behaviorally anchored rating scale
• Ranking methods
• Forced-choice rating
4. WORK STANDARDS APPROACH
• Involves setting a standard level of output and then comparing
every employee’s performance with the standard
• Work standards generally represent the average output of the
average employee
using highly objective factors in evaluating performance.
difficulty of comparing standards for the different categories of
jobs.
5. CRITICAL-INCIDENT APPRAISAL
• The critical incident is recorded by an observer, indicating the
employee’s reaction towards a certain event.
• When recorded, the incidents are, later, used as basis for evaluating
the performance of the employee.
(1) recording the incidents covering all employees whether on a daily
basis is time-consuming;
(2) there is much difficulty in quantifying critical incidents.
6. • list of behavioral descriptions is used by the evaluator in the checklist appraisal.
• The items are presented in questions answerable by either “yes” or “no”
Simple and easy to administer
• evaluator may be affected by his own personal biases in the use of the checklist
• this method is very costly if there are many job categories
CHECKLIST
8. ESSAY APPRAISAL
• Also known as free-form appraisal
• A method where the appraiser writes a narrative about the
person being appraised.
Simple and it requires no complex training for the appraiser
• writing abilities of the appraisers differ
• the narratives often vary in length and content, making it difficult
to compare one person with another
• narratives are difficult to quantify
9. GRAPHIC RATING SCALE
• Uses a set of identified performance factors.
Provides opportunities for quantitative analysis and which facilitates
comparisons of performance between various job categories.
• It does not provide the depth of information other methods do.
11. BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALE
• Behavioral anchors are used to assess the performance of an
employee.
• A separate scale for each job dimension is developed.
• Consists of scale values, which define specific categories of
performance and anchors, which are specific written
statements of actual behavior.
13. RANKING METHODS
• Calls for comparing the performance of two or more
employees.
The more popular ranking methods consist of:
• Alternation,
• Paired comparisons, and
• Forced distribution
14. ALTERNATION
• From a list of employees to be evaluated, the evaluator prepares
another list where the individual names are entered and arranged
according their value or importance.
15. PAIRED COMPARISON
• Under this method the name of an employee is paired with another
and the evaluator determines who is better employee.
Example of paired
comparison results
17. FORCED-CHOICE RATING
Under this method the evaluator also compares the performance of
employees. The evaluator allocates the results to the percentage
requirements of the various pre-determined levels of performance.
18. GOAL SETTING OR MBO
• Sometimes referred to as management by objectives (MBO)
• Facilitate a more elaborate means of performance evaluation
The employee and his superior jointly set goals
The employee tries to meet the goals
Performance is evaluated against the goals
The employee and superior jointly set new goals for the next time
period.
19. For an MBO system to be successful, there are certain
prerequisites that must be satisfied accordingly which are as
follows:
• The use of participative style of management
• Pinpointing which employee is responsible for which results; and
• Providing performance feedback to concerned employees
21. ERRORS IN PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
It is when the result of evaluation of one trait influences the
evaluator in the assessment of the other traits.
To avoid this error, the evaluator must be diligent enough to use the
standard procedure in all traits under consideration.
22. • An error in appraisal may happen when a job consisting of
several tasks is evaluated on the basis of a single criterion.
• Evaluators are confronted with the tendency to use his or her
own value system in appraising the performance of certain
individuals.
• The leniency of the evaluator may lead to a very high or very
low ratings when applied to a group of employees.
23. Is committed when all employees are rated within a narrow range as if the
performances of all employees are equal or almost equal.
24. • Occurs when recent performance is given grater weight than earlier
performance
• The opposite of recency problem is the primary error, where early
performance is considered more important than later performance
25. OVERCOMING ERRORS IN PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL
• Using multiple criteria
• Emphasizing behaviors rather than traits
• Documenting performance behaviors
• Using multiple evaluators
• Evaluating selectively
• Training evaluators
26. o The various methods of appraising performance consist of work standards
approach, critical incident appraisal, checklist, essay appraisal, graphic
rating scale, behaviorally anchored rating scale, ranking methods, forced-
choice rating, and goal setting or management by objectives.
o Information about employee performance may be sourced through
supervisors, peers, subordinates, self, and customers.
27. o Appraisal error consist of halo error, single criterion, leniency error, central
tendency error, and recency problem.
o Errors in performance appraisal may be overcome with the application of
the following: using multiple criteria, emphasizing behavior rather than
traits, documenting performance behaviors, using multiple evaluators,
evaluating selectively, and training evaluators.
28. QUESTIONS:
• What do you think is the commonly
committed error in performing
performance appraisal in an
organization?
• Discuss the advantage of using multiple
raters against single raters.