Standard 4 (Assessment) seems to strike fear in the hearts of all accreditation-wannabes. While it's definitely not for "dummies," assessment doesn't have to be complicated.
Standard Four: Assessment Made Incredibly Easy (Not for Dummies)
1. Assessment made easy
but definitely
NOT for Dummies
Pam
Braden
West
Virginia
University
at
Parkersburg
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
and
accredita@on
2. Expected outcomes. From this session, you
will be able to:
• Explain
the
vocabulary
and
process
ACBSP
uses
including
• 6
Standards
and
4-‐step
“approach”
• Iden@fy
the
“big
deal”
issues
about
assessment
and
accredita@on
• Differen@ate
between
assessment
for
standards
3
&
4
(and
others)
• Evaluate
the
sources
for
data
• Select
from
recommenda@ons
for
compara@ve
data
• Q/A
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
4. ACBSP vocabulary & terminology
Con$nuous
Improvement
Process
and
Organiza$onal
Learning
• APPROACH
–
Do
you
have
a
plan
for
each
standard?
• DEPLOYMENT/IMPLEMENTATION
–
Have
you
implemented
the
plan
and
how
is
it
going
so
far?
What
data
have
you
collected?
• RESULTS/LEARNING
–
What
did
you
learn
from
the
data
collec@on?
Analyze
the
data.
• IMPROVEMENTS
–
What
did
you
FIX,
CHANGE,
or
DO
as
a
result
of
analyzing
the
data?
How
did
you
USE
the
data?
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
5. More Vocabulary: Types/labels for data
• Forma@ve
versus
Summa@ve
• Forma@ve
=
Along
the
way
–
course-‐level
test
banks,
end
of
freshman
year,
BUS
101
course.
Not
grades!
• Summa@ve
–
Near
the
end
of
the
road
–
MFT
• External
vs.
Internal
• External
=
Test
created
by
someone
outside
your
ins@tu@on
• ETS,
ACT,
EBI,
.
.
.usually
something
you
pay
for)
• Simula@ons
–
Glo-‐Bus,
BSG,
CapSim
• Internal
–
“home
grown”
assessment
projects
or
exams
• Porgolio
project
• Integra@ve
capstone
course/project
–
case
analysis
• Compara@ve,
Benchmarking
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
6. Assessment vocabulary 101 – ACBSP style!
• Objec@ve
=
what
you
are
working
toward
in
the
future
(beginning)
• Outcome
=
the
results
at
the
end
(ending)
• Focus
Assessment
info
on
the
OUTCOMES!
What
actually
happened
• Lots
of
synonyms
=
evaluate,
review,
assess,
measure
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
7. Put the SELF in self study. . .
• The
CampusLabs
portal
seems
sterile
and
uninspiring.
Try
to
put
your
ins@tu@on’s
“personality”
in
the
documents.
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
SELF
=
Include
faculty
at
every
step
of
the
process.
8. Assessment for every standard
Quick
overview
of
the
6
standards
and
how
assessment
should
be
included
on
every
standard.
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
9. OrganizaFonal Profile
• Organiza@onal
Profile
&
Overview
=
your
school’s
context
and
student
profile
• Programs
offered
• Courses
taught
outside
business
unit
• Campuses/Centers
where
business
programs
are
taught
• Organiza@onal
charts
• Regional
accredita@on
• Mission
statements
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
• Provide
info
to
the
public
(catalog
&
web
site)
• Organiza@onal
Descrip@on
• Organiza@onal
Challenges
10. Standard 1 Leadership
• Standard
1
=
Leadership
–
ins$tu$on
and
B-‐
School
• 1.1
–Dean/Chair
leads
the
B
School
• Faculty
involvement
• Evalua@on
(=measurement/assessment)
of
faculty
and
administrators
• Have
a
policy.
• Follow
the
policy.
• Social
Responsibility
(use
the
table
Figure
1.1)
• Ethical
prac@ces
followed
• Regulatory
compliance
(federal
compliance)
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
11. Standard 2 Strategic Planning
2.1
Planning
process:
• Policy
–
HOW
you
plan,
faculty
involved,
iden@fy
measures
• HR
Plan
-‐
#
faculty
needed,
disciplines,
expected
turnover,
re@rements
• Strategic
Plan
–
Aligns
with
the
ins@tu@onal
Strategic
Plan
2.2
Deployment
• Demonstrate
that
you
follow
the
planning
process
on
the
books.
• Measures
used
for
each
short-‐
and
long-‐term
goal.
As
the
plan
progresses,
include
the
measurements
to
show
progress.
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
12. Standard 3 – Student and Stakeholder Focus
3.1
Who
are
your
target
markets?
Iden@fy
the
groups
Students:
tradi@onal,
non-‐trad,
commuters,
online)
External
stakeholders:
Advisory
boards,
local
community,
employers
3.2
How
do
you
LISTEN
to
them
and
LEARN
from
them?
How
do
you
collect
data
from
them?
When?
3.3
How
do
you
review
(evaluate/assess)
how
well
the
listening
approaches
are
working?
3.4
Listening
for
all
processes
(planning
new
programs,
marke@ng,
process
improvement,
etc.)
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
13. Standard 3 Student and Stakeholder Focus
• 3.5
Recruitment
and
reten@on
focus
• 3.6
Student
complaints.
• 3.7
System
/process
to
determine
sa@sfac@on
and
dissa@sfac@on.
• 3.8
Tables
(Just
do
it;
it’s
in
the
book).
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
14. Process check. . .
Isn’t
this
easy?
See?
I
told
you
so!
J
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
15. Standard 4 Measurement and Analysis of
Student Learning and Performance
1. Have
an
assessment
plan
/
program
for
every
academic
program.
2. Report
results
from
assessment
–
at
least
3
itera@ons
of
successive
data
(same
data
set
3-‐5
@mes).
3. Compare
your
school’s
results
from
year
to
year
and
against
peer
ins@tu@ons.
4. Use
the
results
to
improve
student
learning.
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
16. Standard 5 – Faculty and Staff Focus
• How
do
you
ensure
quality
in
teaching?
TABLES
• HR
Plan
(from
St.
2)
(Helps
assess
the
effecGveness
of
deployment
in
St.
5)
• Employment
Prac@ces
–
full-‐@me
and
adjuncts
–
Composi@on
matches
the
mission
and
program
objec@ves
• HR
process
for
hiring,
firing,
evaluaGng,
training
faculty
• Qualifica@ons
Figure
5.1
(see
Handbook
for
defini@ons)
• Credit
hour
produc@on
by
faculty
Figure
5.2
• Coverage
by
creden@al
Figure
5.3
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
• Deployment
by
mode,
loca@on,
level
(associate,
bachelors,
masters)
Figure
5.4
• Faculty
load
Figure
5.5
• Faculty
EvaluaGon
–
have
policy,
follow
it
• Faculty
Handbook
• Faculty
Development
• Scholarship
&
Professional
Ac@vi@es
Figure
5.6
17. Standard 6 EducaFonal and Business Process
Management
• Educa@onal
design
and
delivery
• Modes
(online,
blended,
various
sites/campuses
–
all
have
same
outcomes)
• Common
Professional
Component
(CPC)
–
show
for
each
level
(associate,
bachelor’s,
masters)
• Course
Syllabus
for
every
required
business
course
(evidence)
• Curriculum
beyond
the
CPC
for
each
program
=
gen
ed
&
“major”
requirements
• Design
&
Delivery
Evalua@on
(measurement
&
assessment)
• Educa@onal
support
services
(assessment
of
each)
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
18. And now for some useful hints. . .
You
can
thank
me
later.
.
.
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
19. Hint: Read, READ, READ!
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
Sample
self
studies,
best
prac@ces,
etc.
ACBSP
web
site
20. Standard 3 v. Standard 4 –
Types of data needed
• Standard
3
–
Student
and
Stakeholder
Focus
• “Warm
Fuzzy”
data
=
sa@sfac@on
data
• Examples:
• Student
evalua@on
of
faculty/
course
(internal)
• Current
students
using
a
na@onally
normed
assessment
such
as
NSEE,
CCSSE,
Noel
Levitz
(External)
• Employer
survey
data
• Graduate
survey
data
• Faculty
and
staff
–
Don’t
forget!
• Standard
4
–
Student
Achievement
on
Learning
Outcomes
–
“HARD”
data
• “Just
the
facts,
Ma'am”
• Student
performance
on
standardized
tests
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
21. Separate the data -‐ Standard 3 vs. Standard 4
Standard
3
–
Students
and
Stakeholders
=
“Warm
fuzzy”
data
Standard
4
=
no
sa$sfac$on
data
Keep
each
sec$on
separate
and
focused
on
the
“ques$on”
• Be
careful
to
keep
each
sub-‐
sec@on
separate
and
try
not
to
repeat
info.
• Standards
3
and
6
have
some
similar
data.
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
3
4
22.
Standard 3 Advisory Boards
• Populated
with
local
business
leaders
that
are
representa@ve
of
poten@al
employers
• Hold
semiannual
mee@ngs
• Great
source
for
feedback
• Minimal
costs
for
hospitality
• Include
minutes
of
mee@ngs
in
the
self
study
as
evidence.
• Invite
them
to
a
breakfast
with
the
site
visit
team
during
the
visit.
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
23. Standard 3 Sources of saFsfacFon data
Sa@sfac@on
surveys
run
by
MKTG
Research
Course
Project
(Free,
great
project!)
• Likely
somewhat
low
response
rates
• Personal
connec@ons
will
help
(FaceBook)
Survey
–
every
2-‐3
years?
(Plan!)
• Employers
• Students
–
CCSSE,
NSSE,
Noel
Levitz,
etc.
• Graduates
• Faculty
and
staff
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
24. Standard 4
• External
comparaGve
data
is
the
gold
standard
for
assessment
of
student
learning
and
performance.
• Examples
include:
• Major
Fields
Test
• Glo-‐Bus
Simula@on
• Porgolio
(LiveText,
EBI,
etc.)
• Tons
of
vendors
out
in
the
hall
at
the
conference.
• Does
not
need
to
cost
a
lot
to
be
effec@ve!
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
25. Standard 4 Vocabulary:
Types/labels for data (again!)
• Forma@ve
versus
Summa@ve
Assessment
• Forma@ve
=
along
the
way
–
end
of
freshman
year,
BUS
101
course
• Summa@ve
–
near
the
end
of
the
road
–
MFT
Associate,
MFT
Business,
MFT
MBA
• External
vs.
Internal
Assessment
• External
=
test
created
by
someone
outside
your
ins@tu@on
• ETS,
ACT,
EBI,
.
.
.usually
something
you
pay
for)
• Simula@ons
–
Glo-‐Bus,
BSG
• Internal
–
“home
grown”
assessment
projects
or
exams
• Porgolio
project
• Capstone
course/project
–
case
analysis
• An
effecGve
Assessment
Plan
has
elements
of
all
these!
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
26. Standard 4 – Glo-‐Bus SimulaFon
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
• My
favorite
simula@on
–
Glo-‐Bus
(marketed
by
McGraw
Hill)
• Used
by
>300
ins@tu@ons
in
30
countries
• Inexpensive:
bundle
with
book,
simula@on,
and
cases.
27. GLO-‐BUS simulaFon – 2 data sets provided
Performance
Benchmark
Report
• Overall
score
–
compare
your
students’
scores
against
all
other
ins@tu@ons
around
the
world
using
the
simula@on.
• ROI
• Stock
Price
• EPS
• Credit
Ra@ng
• Image
Ra@ng
Learning
Assurances
Report
• Leadership
Skills
(based
on
peer
evalua@ons)
• Collabora@on
and
Teamwork
Skills
(peer
eval)
• Financial
Analysis
• Financial
Management
• Opera@ons
Management
• Marke@ng
Management
• Human
Resources
Management
• Strategic
Analysis
and
Planning
• Corporate
Social
Responsibility
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
28. Glo-‐Bus “Learning Assurances” Data
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
Includes
“Learning
Assurances
report”
on
sov
and
analysis
skills:
1. Leadership
Skills
2. Collabora@on
&
Teamwork
3. Analy@cal
Skills
4. Opera@ons
Mgmt
5. Financial
Mgmt
6. Marke@ng
Mgmt
7. HR
Mgmt
8. Strategic
Planning
&
Analysis
9. Corporate
Social
Responsibility
External
=
Compara@ve
Benchmarking
against
300
other
schools;
Internal
–
Compare
semester
to
semester
over
@me
31. MFT Sub-‐scores correlate with CPC
CPC
Bachelor’s
requirements:
• Func@onal
areas:
• Marke@ng
• Finance
• Accoun@ng
• Mgmt
(including
Prod/Op,
OB,
HR)
• Business
Environment:
• Legal
Environment
of
Business
• Economics
• Business
Ethics
• Global
Dimensions
of
Business
• Technical
Skills
• Informa@on
Systems
• Quan@ta@ve
Techniques/Stats
• Integra@ve
Areas:
• Business
Policy
or
comprehensive
integra@ng
experience
9
MFT
Sub-‐scores
(Bachelor’s
test)
$25/test
=
add
a
fee?
Subscrip@on
for
sub-‐scores
=
$700/yr
A1
-‐
Accoun@ng
A2
-‐
Economics
A3
–
Management
A4
-‐
Quan@ta@ve
Business
Analysis
A5
–
Finance
A6
–
Marke@ng
A7
-‐
Legal
and
Social
Environment
A8
–
Informa@on
Systems
A9
–
Interna@onal
Issues
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
32. Sub-‐scores data drills down to concepts you can FIX!
(Useable data to improve student learning!)
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Percent
Correct
WVUP
Performance
on
Quan$ta$ve
Business
Analysis
Sub-‐Scores
Fall
2013
-‐
Fall
2014
WVUP
%
Correct
Na@onal
%
Correct
33. RecommendaFons – “Just do it”
• Own
the
process.
If
your
assessment
program
is
in
development,
acknowledge
that
you
are
working
on
implemen@ng
the
new
plan.
Trying
to
“fake
it”
doesn’t
work!
• Focus
on
PROCESS
and
Con@nuous
Improvement
in
every
part
of
the
ins@tu@on
and
your
business
program
opera@ons.
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
34. Complete the “recommended” tables and figures
in the handbook for EVERY standard.
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015
35. Key words to think about all the Fme:
• Faculty
involvement
• Con@nuous
improvement
• High
quality
• Documenta@on
/
evidence
• Strategic
Plan
and
PLANNING
• HR
Plan
• Advisory
Boards
• Have
a
policy;
follow
it!
#ACBSPAccredited
@ACBSP2015