1. From Database
Dumps to Top-Notch
Teaching Tools:
Designing Targeted Research
Guides with Users in Mind
Liz Johns | emjohns@jhu.edu | @emjohns1988
Librarian for Education at Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, MD
2. While you’re waiting...
Choose a research
guide that you want
to develop or
redevelop. You’ll use
that guide as a focus
for today’s activities.
Submit the
name/topic of the
guide in the poll.
Respond to Poll:
Web: Go to
pollev.com/lizjohns
Text:
Text LIZJOHNS to
22333.
Then text the name of
your guide.
3. From Database
Dumps to Top-Notch
Teaching Tools:
Designing Targeted Research
Guides with Users in Mind
Liz Johns | emjohns@jhu.edu | @emjohns1988
Librarian for Education at Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, MD
4. GOAL
To take a logical, evidence-based
approach to LibGuides content
development.
5. Learning Objectives
Utilize Mayer’s
SOI model to
develop user-
centered,
pedagogically
sound research
guides.
Critically
analyze content
and structure of
a pedagogically
sound research
guide.
Organize
content in a
research guide
based on
logical and
evidence-
based needs.
6. Today
ï¿Intro to Constructivist Learning Theory
ï¿Intro to the SOE Model
ï¿Developing/Redeveloping Guides
Using the SOI Model
ï¿Q&A
8. Key Features of Constructivism
Emphasis on
big concepts
Learning is
interactive,
builds upon
what student
already knows
Process is as
important as
the product
14. Choose a guide
Choose a research
guide that you want
to develop or
redevelop. You’ll use
that guide as a focus
for today’s activities.
Submit the
name/topic of the
guide in the poll.
Respond to Poll:
Web: Go to
pollev.com/lizjohns
Text:
Text LIZJOHNS to
22333.
Then text the name of
your guide.
15. Activity: Audiences
Activity 1: Define
Audience(s)
On index cards, write
down the different
audiences for your
guides.
One audience per
card.
Ed.D Students
Education Faculty
Non-education
students doing
education research
16. Activity: Audiences
Activity 2: Prioritize
audiences
Label each audience:
Most frequent
Most important
Most needy
Possible audience,
less of a focus.
Ed.D Students
Education Faculty
Non-education
students doing
education research
*
!
*
20. Activity 3: Select Resources/Content
Complete the chart
Most
important
Most
frequently
used
Most asked
about
Most
important to
you
-ERIC
-Education
Journals
-PsycINFO
-SocAbs
-ERIC
-Education
Journals
-PsycINFO
-Google
Scholar
-Google
Scholar
-ERIC
-JSTOR
-Catalyst
-DSM5
-Psychological
Tests
-ERIC
-Education
Journals
-PsycINFO
-SocAbs
21. Activity 4: Map Resources to Audiences
Ed.D Students SOE Faculty
Non-education
students doing
education research
*
24. Activity 5: Rapid Design
Create an outline for your guide
(traditional outline, wireframes, drawing,
etc.)
Does not have to follow your current
organization and structure.
Include notes about headings, format,
graphics.
28. Activity 6: Discuss
1.Pair up.
2.Partner 1 explain outline.
3.Partner 2 ask questions, make
suggestions.
GOAL: Understand the why of the
design.
Switch. Four minutes per person.
38. Create Evidence-based Guides
Use your library’s data and statistics to
determine audiences and resources.
Use research-based best practices to
organize and integrate information.
39. Disclaimer
This is not the only learning theory that
can be used to develop online learning
tools.
It is a theory; not a fact. Use methods that
work best for you.
40. GOAL
To take a logical, evidence-based
approach to LibGuides content
development.
41. Recommended Reading
Mayer, R. E. (1999). Designing instruction
for constructivist learning. In Reigeluth,
C.M. (Ed.), Instructional-design theories
and models: A new paradigm of
instructional theory (141-159). Mahwah,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Very quickly get an intro to constructivist learning theory and Mayer’s SOI model. There is a lot of literature out there about this, and we’re not going to get too far into it. I just want to give the basics so we get the general idea, but we’re going to spend much more time applying the model and seeing it in action.
Emphasis on big concepts
Learning is interactive and builds upon what the students already know
Process is as important as the product
The learner is able to make sense of the material. Can both retain the information (for example, write down what they remember from a learning activity) and transfer the information (answer questions that ask them to use the information in a different way).
Example in text: Read paragraph about Formation of Lightning
Retention: explain how lightning forms
Transfer: Suppose there are clouds in the sky but there is no lightning. Why not? What causes lightning? What could you do to reduce the intensity of a lightning storm?
Through this learning process, students identify the important info from the passage, organizes it into a coherent representation in their mind, and integrates it with existing models.
For creating LibGuides, we are both the instructor and the instructional designer.
This is a cognitive process that students go through. They select the important info on their own, organize it in their own head, and integrate it when asked to do so. But Mayer applies this theory and model to instructional design. I am taking the SOI model and applying it to how we can design research guides.
We are going to go through the model and create a better learning experience for our learners. We are going to select the important information, organize it, and integrate it to help the use make sense of and use the information on the guide.
Use data to help you determine your audiences.
Use data to support this!
Now this is where we are really going to get into the SOI Model.
Use evidence and data to support this.
Selecting the most important information for the most important people.
Understanding that you may have to work within the confines of your libguides platform.
What goes on top? What can be further down? What’s on the first page? What’s on the second page? Is there a second page?
This is homework.
Make the most out of the model. Use these tips to better select, organize, and integrate information to create strong libguides.
If you can search in Ebsco, you can search in Proquest
If this ends up not working for you, or you find a better method, go for it! And I’d love to hear about it. This seemed to be the most logical way to approach it at my institution, and it works for me and my users as far as I know. I do plan to do some usability studies at some point, testing the use of this model.
Experiential learning, problem-based learning, discovery-based learning all might work too. But for the purpose of research guides, this seemed to be the best approach. We are using other methods and theories to influence our development of other online learning tools.