Downloaded 14 times
Uploaded byTom Hootman
Owning zero usgbc co rmg 2012
This document discusses zero energy commercial buildings and presents data on their costs and performance. It references a 2012 report from the New Buildings Institute analyzing zero energy commercial projects built between 1990-2012. The report found projects cost $259-334 per square foot on average, with most under 50,000 square feet. It also shows energy use intensity and renewable energy generation data for several exemplar zero energy projects.
Owning zero usgbc co rmg 2012
- 2. Shanti Pless, LEEDAP NREL, Commercial Buildings Research Group Tom Hootman, AIA, LEED AP RNL, Director of Sustainability
- 5. 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 New Buildings Institute Getting to Zero 2012 Status Update: A First Look at the Costs and Features of 2 Zero Energy Commercial Buildings (March 2012)
- 6. 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 New Buildings Institute Getting to Zero 2012 Status Update: A First Look at the Costs and Features of 2 Zero Energy Commercial Buildings (March 2012)
- 7. 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 New Buildings Institute Getting to Zero 2012 Status Update: A First Look at the Costs and Features of 2 Zero Energy Commercial Buildings (March 2012)
- 8. California PUC 2030 Massachusetts 2030 Federal / EISA 2030 ASHRAE Vision 2020 2030 Challenge Living Building Challenge
- 9. 13 11 19 5 1K-5K 5K-10K 10K-25K 25K-50K 8 50K-100K 4 >100K New Buildings Institute Getting to Zero 2012 Status Update: A First Look at the Costs and Features of Zero Energy Commercial Buildings (March 2012)
- 11. RSF Cost: $259/SF Average Cost: $334/SF Cost per Square Foot Other Certified Silver Gold Platinum Source: DBIA Project Database
- 16. Images courtesy ofArchitectural Nexus
- 17. Image Image Image courtesy of GSA, Beck Group and Westlake Reed Leskosky
- 21. New Buildings Institute EnergyPerformance of LEED for New Construction Buildings (March 2008)
- 23. Goal Setting Contractual Performance Design for Operations Manage Plug Loads The Handoff Feedback Loop
- 24. I want agreen building Design a LEED <rating> building Design a building to use 30% less energy than ASHRAE 90.1-2004 Design a building to use less than 25,000 BTU/sqft Design a net zero energy building
- 30. 1. Mission Critical Safety LEEDPlatinum Energy Star
- 31. 2. Highly Desirable 800staff Capacity Flexible workspace 25kBTU/sf/year Support future technologies Architectural integrity “How to” manual Honor future staff needs Real-time PR” campaign Measurable ASHRAE 90.1 Secure collaboration with outsiders Support culture and amenities Building information modeling Expandable building Substantial Completion by 2010 Ergonomics
- 32. 3. If Possible Netzero design approach Most energy efficient building in the world LEED Platinum Plus ASHRAE 90.1 + 50% Visual displays of current energy efficiency Support public tours National and global recognition and awards Support personnel turnover
- 48. Predictive Modeling (Absolute energy target) VERSUS Compliance Modeling (Percent better than ASHRAE 90.1)
- 49. COMPETITION DESIGN CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS CHARRETTE MODEL AS-DESIGNED MODEL LEED MODEL + BASELINE AS-BUILT MODEL OPERATIONS MODEL
- 50. Energy Use Intensity: 2030 Baseline LEED Baseline Design/Actual 137 kBtu/SF/year 55 kBtu/SF/year 35 kBtu/SF/year Net Zero Energy Building (After PV): Site ZEB Source ZEB Emissions ZEB 0 kBtu/SF/year -20 kBtu/SF/year -5 LB CO2e/SF/year B Classification B Classification B Classification
- 60. Operators Occupants Executives IT Managers Food Service HR Managers
- 63. First day ofNet zero – June 23, 2011
- 65. Measured Versus ModeledMonthly and Cumulative EUI Innovation for Our Energy Future
- 66. October 2010 –September 2011 Lighting Power Density Innovation for Our Energy Future
- 67. October 2010 –September 2011 Plug Load Power Density Note: The elevators are included in the plug loads Innovation for Our Energy Future
- 68. October 2010 –September 2011 Daily Heating Energy Innovation for Our Energy Future
- 69. 2011 YTD DailyCooling Energy Innovation for Our Energy Future
- 70. October 2010 –September 2011 Mechanical System Power Density Note: Control of the VFDs was optimized in late October 2010, resulting in energy savings Note: Control of the dampers was optimized in April 2011, resulting in energy savings Note: The mechanical load is comprised of only fans and pumps Innovation for Our Energy Future
- 71. Coordinate with Commissioning Coordinate with O&M Plan Plan Energy Information System Analyze and Report Energy Data
- 72. Manage Plug andProcess Loads Educate and Train Occupants Plan for Future Changes Celebrate Success!
- 73. SAVE A SEAT FOR YOUR DESIGN-BUILD TEAM?
Editor's Notes
- #5 1 February 2011 NREL Case Study by RNL