Slides from my presentation at JALT Hokkaido Conference 21 September, 2014. Attitudes to peer-feedback are explored in EFL writing classes in a private university in Japan. Students appear generally open to sharing and participating in peer-feedback, though experience with implementation is mixed (as seen in the end of semester survey results). Modeling and training before implementation is recommended (I should have done more). Mixing partners is also recommended so that learners experience a variety of feedback styles from various peers.
Dr. M. Enamul Hoque is a prominent researcher and ELT specialist. He teaches English as a Foreign Language (EFL) at the undergraduate and postgraduate levels. He has long experience in curriculum and syllabus design. He is an M.A. in English from Dhaka University. He has also obtained his M.Phil. and PhD Degree in Applied Linguistics and ELT. He publishes a wide range of materials for Teacher Development in the recognized journals in home and abroad. He is the author of a number of books taught at the Higher Secondary and Undergraduate levels. He presents papers in national and international conferences. He leads two International Journals registered with the ISSN International Center as the Executive Editor of The EDRC Journal of Learning and Teaching, and The Journal of EFL Education and Research.
Dr. M. Enamul Hoque is a prominent researcher and ELT specialist. He teaches English as a Foreign Language (EFL) at the undergraduate and postgraduate levels. He has long experience in curriculum and syllabus design. He is an M.A. in English from Dhaka University. He has also obtained his M.Phil. and PhD Degree in Applied Linguistics and ELT. He publishes a wide range of materials for Teacher Development in the recognized journals in home and abroad. He is the author of a number of books taught at the Higher Secondary and Undergraduate levels. He presents papers in national and international conferences. He leads two International Journals registered with the ISSN International Center as the Executive Editor of The EDRC Journal of Learning and Teaching, and The Journal of EFL Education and Research.
-Focus: Guided Writing is a three-level Writing series designed to engage young learners
-Progression: After completing level appropriate skills books in writing, students can develop their writing and creative thinking skills
-Page Count: Student Book- 104 pages & Workbook- 52 pages
-Unit Structure: 12 units- Student Book 8 pages per unit & Workbook 4 pages per unit
-Packaging: Each book includes a pull-out workbook
-Downloadable materials: Answer Keys, Additional Materials
Website: www.compasspub.com/GW
This session will give teachers new tools to make text comprehensible for ELLs including various ways to scaffold reading and increase comprehension. Strategies include pre-teaching vocabulary, scaffolding textbook readings, and selecting alternative readings as well as interaction with the text to increase comprehension.
10-step guide to teaching effective conversation classesDylan Gates
Do you struggle when teaching adult conversation classes? This short guide outlines a strategy for delivering classes which focus on your learners' needs and interests.
Write On is a three-book writing series designed for young EFL students. Throughout the series, students practice writing in a wide variety of styles such as narrative, descriptive, process, definition, expository, summary, review, compare/contrast, persuasive, and cause/effect paragraphs.
-Focus: Guided Writing is a three-level Writing series designed to engage young learners
-Progression: After completing level appropriate skills books in writing, students can develop their writing and creative thinking skills
-Page Count: Student Book- 104 pages & Workbook- 52 pages
-Unit Structure: 12 units- Student Book 8 pages per unit & Workbook 4 pages per unit
-Packaging: Each book includes a pull-out workbook
-Downloadable materials: Answer Keys, Additional Materials
Website: www.compasspub.com/GW
This session will give teachers new tools to make text comprehensible for ELLs including various ways to scaffold reading and increase comprehension. Strategies include pre-teaching vocabulary, scaffolding textbook readings, and selecting alternative readings as well as interaction with the text to increase comprehension.
10-step guide to teaching effective conversation classesDylan Gates
Do you struggle when teaching adult conversation classes? This short guide outlines a strategy for delivering classes which focus on your learners' needs and interests.
Write On is a three-book writing series designed for young EFL students. Throughout the series, students practice writing in a wide variety of styles such as narrative, descriptive, process, definition, expository, summary, review, compare/contrast, persuasive, and cause/effect paragraphs.
UAE High School Students’ Attitude towards Peer Response using Blogs (Ms. Ari...TAEDTECH Sig
Presentation summary:
An exploration into how UAE high school students feel about responding and receiving responses from their peers about their writing. The experiment I am going to present aims at showing the audience how motivating using blogs in writing classes can be. Questions are most welcome. Both secondary and tertiary teachers will find the presentation useful. This experiment has been so overwhelmingly successful that participants will try it with their own classes to implement effective peer-feedback routines in their classes.
Presenter bio
Arini Muntaha has been teaching English for more than 10 years. She earned her MA TESOL Degree at the American University of Sharjah. She is interested in exploring new ideas and techniques for teaching English. She considers using computers in classrooms a major challenge which is worth exploring.
Teaching writing
Of the 4 skills, writing is arguably the most problematic for learners and often the most challenging
for teachers. Writing is not easy particularly when compared with speaking, where
reformulations, body language, clues from listeners can do much to compensate for a lack of
precision or inaccuracies when communicating messages. Time is also a factor – writing may be
relegated to homework tasks as there is often a feeling that writing in class uses up time which can
be more usefully spent on other activities. However, as this workshop aims to show, developing
good writing skills is conducive to the development of other language skills including
communication skills.
Writing across the Curriculum - Middle/Senior Years, MRCLFaye Brownlie
First of three days for MRLC. Establishing a classroom where writing is integral and accessible for all students. Beginning to build criteria with students. Writing with different purposes in mind. Revisiting writing process. Several strategies shared.
Similar to Exploring attitudes towards peer feedback in the writing classroom ライティングにおけるピア・フェードバックに関する学習者側の見解についての検討 (20)
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Exploring attitudes towards peer feedback in the writing classroom ライティングにおけるピア・フェードバックに関する学習者側の見解についての検討
1. Exploring attitudes towards peer-feedback
in the writing classroom
ライティングにおけるピア・フェード
バックに関する学習者側の見解につい
ての検討
HAIDEE THOMSON (HAIDEE.THOMSON@GMAIL.COM)
21 SEP, JALT HOKKAIDO CONFERENCE
2. Writing class activities
Model
Plan
Draft
Teacher-check
Revise and publish
Problem?
A lot of marking for the teacher
Over-reliance on teacher
Missed opportunity for writer reflection
4. Is it good use of class-time?
• Increases meta-cognitive awareness (Wigglesworth &
Storch, 2009)
• Raises audience awareness (Kobayashi, 1988)
• Giver of feedback benefits more than receiver
(Lundstrom & Baker, 2009)
• Get more feedback
5. Are students willing to share?
Research question 1: Are students willing to read and
comment on the writing of others?
Research question 2: Are students willing to let classmates
read their writing and comment?
6. 2 surveys of 5 writing classes
BEFORE
9 questions
N=73
AFTER
13 questions
N=57
1st
year
3rd
year
22%
2nd 52%
year
26%
1st
year
51%
3rd
year
23%
2nd
year
26%
7. Have you ever given suggestions to a classmate
about how to improve their writing?
ライティング力を向上させる方法を、クラスメート
にアドバイスしたことがありますか。
Yes
14%
No
86%
BEFORE
8. 2. Have you ever received suggestions from a classmate on
how to improve your writing?
ライティング力を向上させる方法を、クラスメートからアドバイスし
てもらったことがありますか。
Yes
29%
Can't
remember
26%
No
45%
BEFORE
9. 3. Are you interested in reading other classmates’ writing?
他のクラスメートのライティングを読んでみたいと思いますか。
Yes
78%
Not sure
17%
No
5%
BEFORE
Yes
75%
Not sure
12%
No
13%
AFTER
10. 4. How do you feel about other classmates reading your writing?
他のクラスメートに自分のライティングを読まれることについてどう
思いますか。
I like the
idea
56%
Don't like
the idea
25%
Not sure
19%
BEFORE
I like the
idea
73%
Not sure
7%
Don't like
the idea
20%
AFTER
11. 5. How do you feel about making suggestions for improving other
students‘ writing? 他のクラスメートのライティング力を向上させるため
に、あなた自身が他のクラスメートにアドバイスをすることについてどう思
いますか。
I love the
idea
15%
I like the
idea
59%
I don't know
15%
I don't like
the idea
10%
I hate the
idea
1%
BEFORE
I love the
idea
27%
I like the
idea
45%
I don't know
12%
I don't like
the idea
14%
I hate the
idea
2%
AFTER
12. Do you want to receive suggestions for improving your writing from: a classmate of
your choice? ライティング力の向上について、以下のような人にアドバイスをしてもらい
たいですか。自分で選んだクラスメート
No
3%
I'm not sure
19%
Yes
78%
BEFORE
No
6%
I'm not sure
27%
Yes
67%
AFTER
13. 7. Do you want to receive suggestions for improving your writing from: a
classmate chosen by the teacher?
ライティング力の向上について、以下のような人にアドバイスをしてもらいたいです
か。先生が選んだクラスメト
BEFORE
No
4%
I'm not sure
22%
Yes
74%
BEFORE
No
17%
I'm not sure
28%
Yes
55%
AFTER
14. 7. Rate the overall usefulness of self-check
for you ライティングを自分で添削することは
役に立ちましたか。Not useful
AFTER
2%
Sometimes
useful
Useful 44%
54%
15. 2. Rate the overall usefulness of peer
feedback for you 同級生による添削は役に立
ちましたか。Not useful
AFTER
12%
Sometimes useful
43%
Useful
45%
16. 3. Rate the overall usefulness of teacher
feedback for you 教師による添削は役に立ち
ましたか。
AFTER
Sometimes
Useful
96%
useful
4%
17. 7. Rate the overall usefulness ライティングを
添削することは役に立ちましたか。
AFTER
44.6 42.9
1.8 12.5 0
3.7
53.6
44.6
96.3
SELF-CHECK PEER FEEDBACK TEACHER FEEDBACK
Not useful Sometimes useful Useful
18. Implemented peer-feedback
Formative: Help writers improve their writing
(Peers comment, suggest but do not grade each others
writing)
Purpose: Efficient use of class resources & gaining
reflective editing experience and skills
19. Original – surface errors
Peer feedback form
Print this form and fill it in about your partner’s writing. The writer will submit it to the
teacher with the draft and published writing.
Name of reader: Name of writer:
Date: Title:
What words or phrases does the writer use that you would like to use?
What details would you like the writer to add?
Are there capitals at the beginning of sentences and for proper nouns?
Does every sentence contain a noun and verb?
Are there any sentences that could be joined together?
Is the layout similar to the moodle example?
20. Developed into info gathering
Error checking done in self-check
Information gathering in peer-feedback
Name of reader: Name of writer:
Date: Title:
Underline any sentences which are difficult to understand
Mark any corrections on the essay/email
Why are they applying?
What program are they applying for?
What do they want to know?
When are they arriving for the homestay?
21. Self-check
Self-check: check for surface level errors e.g.
capitalization, spelling, verb agreement etc.
Observed: reduction in surface errors, greater awareness
22. Peer-feed back
Asked for error identification & improvement suggestion
Observed: mixed results, laziness, lack of confidence
Asked for information identification (as suggested in
Nilson, 2003)
Observed: greater engagement with the writing (spent
more time with it).
23. Conclusion
Peer-check:
Students are open to peer-feedback
Students generally enjoy sharing
Training is necessary
Model of student writing that everyone reviews
24. Future classes
Self-check
Useful for reducing error
Experiment with more identification tasks
Avoid Yes/No questions to reduce laziness
Peer-check
Non-evaluative
Information gathering
Reaction to writing
Experiment with mixing partners more
25. Thank you for listening!
Do you have any questions, comments or
suggestions?
26. References
Kobayashi, H. (1988). Views of “Audience” and the Teaching of English Writing.
Studies in Linguistic Culture, 広島大学総合科学部, (14), p. 113–129.
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits
of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language
Writing, 18(1), 30–43. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
Nilson, L. B. (2003). Improving Student Peer Feedback. College Teaching,
51(1), 34–38. doi:10.1080/87567550309596408
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on
fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26(3), 445–466.
doi:http://dx.doi.org.helicon.vuw.ac.nz/10.1177/0265532209104670
27. Slides
For a copy of slide hand-outs see website:
www.haideethomson.com
Or email me:
haidee.thomson@gmail.com
Editor's Notes
How can we make the most of the limited resources in the writing classroom?
How can we encourage learners to critically review their own work before handing it to the teacher for review?
W & S compared the writing of ESL individuals (mixed L1s) with those who produced writing in pairs and found increased accuracy and language related episodes leading to meta-cognitive awareness. Note this was shared writing as opposed to peer-check.
Working together – social-cultural theories of cognitive development through interaction. Experience of team work is useful for future academic and work situations.
Show by year might be better than class, do 3rd years have more experience than 1st years?
Show by year might be better than class, do 3rd years have more experience than 1st years?
Show by year might be better than class, do 3rd years have more experience than 1st years?
Did ss prefer to choose their own partner after experiencing peer-check compared to their prior experience responses? (graph corrected to be only ‘before’ cases Sep 17 evening), need to do same for after, then use calculator to see if different – repeated measures? IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SELF-CHOSEN AND TEACHER-CHOSEN SIG? Do you want to receive suggestions for improving your writing:
Did ss prefer to choose their own partner after experiencing peer-check compared to their prior experience responses? (graph corrected to be only ‘before’ cases Sep 17 evening), need to do same for after, then use calculator to see if different – repeated measures? IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SELF-CHOSEN AND TEACHER-CHOSEN SIG? Do you want to receive suggestions for improving your writing:
Selfcheck M=2.5185, SD=.54047, N=54, Peer feedback M=2.3, SD=.67, N=54, Teacher feedback M=2.963, SD=.19063, N=54A one-way repeated measured analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to evaluate the null hypothesis that there is no difference between ratings of the 3 types of check. The results indicated a significant difference in ratings, Wilks’ Lambda=.423, F(2, 52) = 35.49, p=.000, n2=?) (need to check how to report this and effect size) may have violated mauchly’s test of sphericity since it is significant.004
Avoid potentially awkward social situation of evaluating a peer’s writing, lack of confidence for error identification but anyone can look for info. If it is not there or confusing this will be obvious from the reader’s answer – which can prompt the writer to clarify that point
Writing can be a very isolated activity so introducing peer feedback or collaborative writing gives more opportunity for shared learning to occur