Braun, H. (2004, January 5). Reconsidering the impact of high-stakes testing, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(1). Retrieved [Date] from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n1/.
Nichols, S. L., Glass, G. V, & Berliner, D. C. (2006). High-stakes testing and student achievement: Does accountability pressure increase student learning? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(1). Retrieved [date] from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n1/.
Supovitz, Jonathan. 2010. Is High-Stakes Testing Working? Penn GSE. Retrieved from http://www.gse.upenn.edu/review/feature/supovitz.
Would you like to read more education research papers like the one summarized above on Educational Assessment issues? If so view more at: http://www.bestessayservices.com/blog/sample-education-research-paper-on-educational-assessment-issues/
Would you like to read more education research papers like the one summarized above on Educational Assessment issues? If so view more at: http://www.bestessayservices.com/blog/sample-education-research-paper-on-educational-assessment-issues/
Indonesia and Thailand has many similarities in the education system; but the learning outcome is much different. The purpose of this study is to measure the affective domain of student in both countries. Comparing the similarity and differences of both countries would figure out the certain education policy for better understanding on education system improvements. This research combines qualitative and quantitative research methods using ex post facto approach. The result shows there was significance different on self-esteem, interest, and belief. Indonesia got higher score than Thailand for self-esteem and interest aspect. On the contrary, Thailand got higher score for belief aspect than Indonesia. Both, Indonesia and Thailand got no significance different for attitude. In total, there is no significance different between both countries on affective characteristics. Three factors considered gave effect to effective characteristics profile in both countries namely learning strategy, ICT use, and teacher and student interaction.
The phrase "teaching to the test" commonly means the practice of using a state-mandated test as a guide in deciding what to teach and how to teach it. However, this simple definition understates the complexity of the issue. On one hand, teaching to the test can be a case of the tail wagging the dog, where the needs of the test becomes more important than the teaching. It can even indicate an attempt to subvert the testing process, to beat the system. But seen in a positive light, teaching to the test can describe purposeful efforts to teach students knowledge and skills that have been established as important and included in mandated standards and assessments.
Why has this become an important issue?
Almost every state now has mandated tests for students. More and more, test scores are used for accountability-to make decisions about school accreditation, staff job security or pay, and student promotion and graduation. As the tests have became more high-stakes, the practice of teaching to the test has also increased dramatically. School personnel want their students to succeed and show what they know on the tests, and they often feel pressure to use any means available to raise scores. However, while families and the general public are demanding higher standards and higher scores, there is increasing concern, sometimes very vocally expressed, that the time and effort spent teaching to the test is educationally shortchanging students.
What's wrong with teaching to tests?
There's nothing wrong with teaching the general content and skills included on a test, as long as the test is assessing the "right" things and asking students to demonstrate their knowledge in ways that parallel real-world applications. The problem often develops when a test does not match standards for what students should know and be able to do, covers a very narrow set of objectives from the broader base of knowledge and skills included in standards, or includes mostly items that focus on recall of isolated facts. In cases such as these, both experts and practicing educators fear that teaching to the test may:
- narrow or distort the curriculum;
- emphasize use of short-term over long-term memory;
- discourage creative thinking;
When is teaching to the test appropriate?
In general, the better the test, the more it can be used as a guide for good instruction. There is much less controversy about teaching to the test when the test itself:
- reflects solid content standards;
- assesses a broad range of knowledge and skills;
How can we teach to the test the right way?
- Legitimate teaching to the test is not instruction targeted at specific items that will appear on the test, or that appeared on last year's version. Instruction can, however, appropriately be targeted to the general content and skills that will be assessed.
Source: https://ebookschoice.com/teaching-to-the-test/
Indonesia and Thailand has many similarities in the education system; but the learning outcome is much different. The purpose of this study is to measure the affective domain of student in both countries. Comparing the similarity and differences of both countries would figure out the certain education policy for better understanding on education system improvements. This research combines qualitative and quantitative research methods using ex post facto approach. The result shows there was significance different on self-esteem, interest, and belief. Indonesia got higher score than Thailand for self-esteem and interest aspect. On the contrary, Thailand got higher score for belief aspect than Indonesia. Both, Indonesia and Thailand got no significance different for attitude. In total, there is no significance different between both countries on affective characteristics. Three factors considered gave effect to effective characteristics profile in both countries namely learning strategy, ICT use, and teacher and student interaction.
The phrase "teaching to the test" commonly means the practice of using a state-mandated test as a guide in deciding what to teach and how to teach it. However, this simple definition understates the complexity of the issue. On one hand, teaching to the test can be a case of the tail wagging the dog, where the needs of the test becomes more important than the teaching. It can even indicate an attempt to subvert the testing process, to beat the system. But seen in a positive light, teaching to the test can describe purposeful efforts to teach students knowledge and skills that have been established as important and included in mandated standards and assessments.
Why has this become an important issue?
Almost every state now has mandated tests for students. More and more, test scores are used for accountability-to make decisions about school accreditation, staff job security or pay, and student promotion and graduation. As the tests have became more high-stakes, the practice of teaching to the test has also increased dramatically. School personnel want their students to succeed and show what they know on the tests, and they often feel pressure to use any means available to raise scores. However, while families and the general public are demanding higher standards and higher scores, there is increasing concern, sometimes very vocally expressed, that the time and effort spent teaching to the test is educationally shortchanging students.
What's wrong with teaching to tests?
There's nothing wrong with teaching the general content and skills included on a test, as long as the test is assessing the "right" things and asking students to demonstrate their knowledge in ways that parallel real-world applications. The problem often develops when a test does not match standards for what students should know and be able to do, covers a very narrow set of objectives from the broader base of knowledge and skills included in standards, or includes mostly items that focus on recall of isolated facts. In cases such as these, both experts and practicing educators fear that teaching to the test may:
- narrow or distort the curriculum;
- emphasize use of short-term over long-term memory;
- discourage creative thinking;
When is teaching to the test appropriate?
In general, the better the test, the more it can be used as a guide for good instruction. There is much less controversy about teaching to the test when the test itself:
- reflects solid content standards;
- assesses a broad range of knowledge and skills;
How can we teach to the test the right way?
- Legitimate teaching to the test is not instruction targeted at specific items that will appear on the test, or that appeared on last year's version. Instruction can, however, appropriately be targeted to the general content and skills that will be assessed.
Source: https://ebookschoice.com/teaching-to-the-test/
www.earnperhit.com/essay => Professional academic writing
www.Lucky-Bet.site => Bet on Sports - 50% Deposit Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/casino => Online Casino - 5000$ Welcome Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/lotto247 => Lotto247 - Win Big, Live Free
www.Lucky-Bet.site/eurobet => Best European Bookmaker
Discussion ab out trends in assessment and accountability for National Superintendent's Dialogue
Standards-based and Standardized Assessment.pptxwinda kho
A standardized assessment is a test consisting of a set of questions pulled from a common bank. All test takers are required to answer the same questions so the test can be scored in a consistent manner.
Steve Vitto Response to Intvervention (RTI) in School-wide Behavior Support 2009Steve Vitto
This is an overview of the RTI process presented by Steve Vitto in East Grand Rapids in November 2008. Steve can be contacted at svitto@muskegonisd.org
Steve Vitto Response to Intervention (RTI)Steve Vitto
A recent presentation on Response to Intervention and relating the three tier model to evidenced based behavioral supports (i.e., as it applies to classroom management , strategic interventions and interventions for intensive behaviors).
Presentación del estudio realizado por la profesora Susanna Loeb y otros autores (Universidad de Stanford) en la sede del Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa (marzo 2013) sobre cómo medir la calidad de los directores a partir de las puntuaciones de los alumnos en test estandarizados.
Reviewing the Research and PEAC Recommendations around Principal EvaluationRichard Voltz
Presentation made by Benjamin Fenton, Chief Strategy and Knowledge Officer and Co-Founder of New Leaders for New Schools at the IASA sponsored workshop on November 18, 2011 at the Triple I Conference.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
6. Benefits of the research… -Changes in schools’ grading policy -Changes to teachers’ incentive system -Help create new policies regarding assessments
7. History of High Stakes Testing… -In the 1980s, the U.S. education system were deemed “ at risk ” of failure
8. -To counter this, lawmakers started transforming the schools’ system with high stakes testing playing a major role
9. Pros of High Stakes Testing 1. Quality of American education can be greatly improved by a system of rewards and sanctions that results from students’ test performance
10.
11. 2. The effects of high stakes testing threaten the validity of test scores, but also lead to “perverse” and “corrupt” educational practice
12. What influence high stake testing? No Child Left Behind Law , passed in 2002
13. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) -States must have a set of academic standards -Assessments to monitor the progress of students to meet those set of standards
14. -Schools must report to the states these assessment’s scores divide into different categories and sub groups (ethnicity, economic background, etc.)
15. -States must create a rating system on the schools base on the data they sent about the students’ scores
16. - States must create a plan (Adequate Yearly Progress or AYP) that would ensure 100 percent of its students will reach academic proficiency by the year 2014–2015
17. - States must come up with a system of accountability that includes rewards and sanctions to schools, educators, and students that are tied to whether they meet state’s goals outlined in the AYP plan.
18. Research Report -I decided to do a little research about this topic. Since my school does a lot of mock TAKS testing days. I decided to examine students’ score over time.
22. Bibliography Braun, H. (2004, January 5). Reconsidering the impact of high-stakes testing, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12 (1). Retrieved [Date] from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n1/. Nichols, S. L., Glass, G. V, & Berliner, D. C. (2006). High-stakes testing and student achievement: Does accountability pressure increase student learning? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14 (1). Retrieved [date] from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n1/. Supovitz, Jonathan. 2010. Is High-Stakes Testing Working? Penn GSE . Retrieved from http://www.gse.upenn.edu/review/feature/supovitz.
