SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Evaluation
Your name
Research
I think that for audiences I have used my time to research
effectively, I am content with how I researched and what I used
and how I laid everything out. I looked into multiple different
websites that all had different styles and buttons etc. my
research helped me a lot during production and planning
because it showed me what features make a website successful
and also appealing. It also helped me with laying out my features
such as buttons, links and photos etc. I think that overall, my
research was useful and helped me create my FMP to the best of
my ability. It also helped me create my planning section with
ease.
Planning
After research, I began my planning. I think that my research
gave me a head start and a good idea of what I wanted to do for
my website. I began creating mood boards, brain storms and just
creating a general idea of what types of styles, layouts and
colours I planned to use. I also had to settle on a theme, design
and potential sounds. Once I found what I was happy with I
could then develop and improve my ideas. A strength of my
planning was having multiple ideas so if something went wrong I
always had a backup.
Time Management
I think that once again I could have managed my time a little
better within the writing sections. This meant that I had to rush
my evaluation and reflection diary because I wasted time having
to check through work looking for any not completed and also
for any I have not uploaded. With production, I think my time
management has been good, but I could worked more at home
since I missed quite a bit of college time. I also wasted a few
weeks of working at home because my computer was broken
and I couldn’t find my work on my partners computer.
Technical Qualities
One technical quality for my website has to be the simplistic but
still appealing theme, this made it easy to navigate and work
around. It also kept you interested since if it was packed with
loads of things you could get overwhelmed. Another technical
quality could also be how I've used a feature that allowed my
photos to rotate on a time schedule which added a nice effect to
my website. My website was similar to another website that
advertised York to everyone and helped people find places to eat
and attractions in general.
Aesthetic Qualities
I think that one aesthetic quality was the style and theme of my
website, I'm really happy with the way I designed the theme and
layout of the homepage because I think that it looks
professional. I purposely chose red because it is a bold and eye
catching colour, to complement the red I chose white and black, I
also made sure to add lots of photos to make it more appealing.
One weakness was that despite me enjoying how it looks, I feel
like I could have added more to make it look even better.
Audience Appeal
I think that my website successfully appealed to the audiences
demands as I kept it simplistic and modern, I also made sure not
to over complicate any of the writing I did so it was easier to
understand. I also chose more “modern” or just cool- looking in
general places as my audiences age range is known for liking and
enjoying more “instagramable” places to eat out at. The results
from my survey showed that people much prefer eating out in
York compared to sight seeing, etc.
Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
– The colours and aesthetic appeal
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– More detail
Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
– Design
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– Adding more information about the locations
chosen
Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
– Extra features like subscribe buttons and map
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– details
Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer
feedback?
– I agree that I needed to bulk up my website a little
more with location information.
• What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback?
– I think that the theme was nice and
complimenting despite being simple
Peer Feedback Summary
I think that I could improve how I planned the website, my
research was good however I could have planned a layout to
help me a little more. I also know that out of all, research was my
strong point, this meaning next time I will try harder on planning
ad production. If I were to redo this, I would make sure to have a
finalized plan for my layout, theme etc so all I need to do is
execute it.

More Related Content

Similar to new evaluation.pptx

Dev diary fmp
Dev diary fmp Dev diary fmp
Dev diary fmp
Tommy Lister
 
7. fmp evaluation 2
7. fmp evaluation 27. fmp evaluation 2
7. fmp evaluation 2
louis harman
 
Fmp production dev diary
Fmp production dev diary Fmp production dev diary
Fmp production dev diary
Tommy Lister
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
kipppp
 
7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)
Stephen Royle
 
Task 3 - Review.pptx
Task 3 - Review.pptxTask 3 - Review.pptx
Task 3 - Review.pptx
Trizzy Wizzy
 
7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)
Stephen Royle
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
kallum-sykes
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
yorkcollege
 
7. Evaluation
7. Evaluation7. Evaluation
7. Evaluation
stefan hughes
 
L3 CMPT Y2 Evaluation Template.pptx
L3 CMPT Y2 Evaluation Template.pptxL3 CMPT Y2 Evaluation Template.pptx
L3 CMPT Y2 Evaluation Template.pptx
DanRichardson44
 
Evaluation vegnauary
Evaluation vegnauaryEvaluation vegnauary
Evaluation vegnauary
Jamie Kessel
 
7. Evaluation
7. Evaluation7. Evaluation
7. Evaluation
stefan hughes
 
Factual Page Layout Evaluation
Factual Page Layout EvaluationFactual Page Layout Evaluation
Factual Page Layout Evaluationkatietorpey1
 
Factual Page Layout Evaluation Task 10
Factual Page Layout Evaluation Task 10Factual Page Layout Evaluation Task 10
Factual Page Layout Evaluation Task 10katietorpey1
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
Daniel Thompson
 
5. evaluation 3
5. evaluation 35. evaluation 3
5. evaluation 3
holly-clark
 
7. fmp evaluation 2
7. fmp evaluation 27. fmp evaluation 2
7. fmp evaluation 2
rhiannah baker
 
Client evaluation
 Client evaluation  Client evaluation
Client evaluation
Tom Batty
 

Similar to new evaluation.pptx (20)

Dev diary fmp
Dev diary fmp Dev diary fmp
Dev diary fmp
 
7. fmp evaluation 2
7. fmp evaluation 27. fmp evaluation 2
7. fmp evaluation 2
 
Fmp production dev diary
Fmp production dev diary Fmp production dev diary
Fmp production dev diary
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)
 
Task 3 - Review.pptx
Task 3 - Review.pptxTask 3 - Review.pptx
Task 3 - Review.pptx
 
7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
 
7. Evaluation
7. Evaluation7. Evaluation
7. Evaluation
 
L3 CMPT Y2 Evaluation Template.pptx
L3 CMPT Y2 Evaluation Template.pptxL3 CMPT Y2 Evaluation Template.pptx
L3 CMPT Y2 Evaluation Template.pptx
 
Evaluation vegnauary
Evaluation vegnauaryEvaluation vegnauary
Evaluation vegnauary
 
7. Evaluation
7. Evaluation7. Evaluation
7. Evaluation
 
Factual Page Layout Evaluation
Factual Page Layout EvaluationFactual Page Layout Evaluation
Factual Page Layout Evaluation
 
Factual Page Layout Evaluation Task 10
Factual Page Layout Evaluation Task 10Factual Page Layout Evaluation Task 10
Factual Page Layout Evaluation Task 10
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
5. evaluation 3
5. evaluation 35. evaluation 3
5. evaluation 3
 
7. fmp evaluation 2
7. fmp evaluation 27. fmp evaluation 2
7. fmp evaluation 2
 
Client evaluation
 Client evaluation  Client evaluation
Client evaluation
 

More from shelbyallerton

0.5) proposal.pptx
0.5) proposal.pptx0.5) proposal.pptx
0.5) proposal.pptx
shelbyallerton
 
0) pre proposal.pptx
0) pre proposal.pptx0) pre proposal.pptx
0) pre proposal.pptx
shelbyallerton
 
2)research.pptx
2)research.pptx2)research.pptx
2)research.pptx
shelbyallerton
 
2. research.pptx
2. research.pptx2. research.pptx
2. research.pptx
shelbyallerton
 
1) context (1).pptx
1) context (1).pptx1) context (1).pptx
1) context (1).pptx
shelbyallerton
 
1) context.pptx
1) context.pptx1) context.pptx
1) context.pptx
shelbyallerton
 
pages 1 and 2.pptx
pages 1 and 2.pptxpages 1 and 2.pptx
pages 1 and 2.pptx
shelbyallerton
 
final page.pptx
final page.pptxfinal page.pptx
final page.pptx
shelbyallerton
 
pages 5 and 6.pptx
pages 5 and 6.pptxpages 5 and 6.pptx
pages 5 and 6.pptx
shelbyallerton
 
pages 3 and 4.pptx
pages 3 and 4.pptxpages 3 and 4.pptx
pages 3 and 4.pptx
shelbyallerton
 
reflection.pptx
reflection.pptxreflection.pptx
reflection.pptx
shelbyallerton
 
3. planning and pre production.pptx
3. planning and pre production.pptx3. planning and pre production.pptx
3. planning and pre production.pptx
shelbyallerton
 
2. research.pptx
2. research.pptx2. research.pptx
2. research.pptx
shelbyallerton
 
1. idea gen.pptx
1. idea gen.pptx1. idea gen.pptx
1. idea gen.pptx
shelbyallerton
 
research.pptx
research.pptxresearch.pptx
research.pptx
shelbyallerton
 
planning.pptx
planning.pptxplanning.pptx
planning.pptx
shelbyallerton
 
1. Research.pptx
1. Research.pptx1. Research.pptx
1. Research.pptx
shelbyallerton
 
proposal .docx
proposal .docxproposal .docx
proposal .docx
shelbyallerton
 
pre proposal.docx
pre proposal.docxpre proposal.docx
pre proposal.docx
shelbyallerton
 
4) evaluation.pptx
4) evaluation.pptx4) evaluation.pptx
4) evaluation.pptx
shelbyallerton
 

More from shelbyallerton (20)

0.5) proposal.pptx
0.5) proposal.pptx0.5) proposal.pptx
0.5) proposal.pptx
 
0) pre proposal.pptx
0) pre proposal.pptx0) pre proposal.pptx
0) pre proposal.pptx
 
2)research.pptx
2)research.pptx2)research.pptx
2)research.pptx
 
2. research.pptx
2. research.pptx2. research.pptx
2. research.pptx
 
1) context (1).pptx
1) context (1).pptx1) context (1).pptx
1) context (1).pptx
 
1) context.pptx
1) context.pptx1) context.pptx
1) context.pptx
 
pages 1 and 2.pptx
pages 1 and 2.pptxpages 1 and 2.pptx
pages 1 and 2.pptx
 
final page.pptx
final page.pptxfinal page.pptx
final page.pptx
 
pages 5 and 6.pptx
pages 5 and 6.pptxpages 5 and 6.pptx
pages 5 and 6.pptx
 
pages 3 and 4.pptx
pages 3 and 4.pptxpages 3 and 4.pptx
pages 3 and 4.pptx
 
reflection.pptx
reflection.pptxreflection.pptx
reflection.pptx
 
3. planning and pre production.pptx
3. planning and pre production.pptx3. planning and pre production.pptx
3. planning and pre production.pptx
 
2. research.pptx
2. research.pptx2. research.pptx
2. research.pptx
 
1. idea gen.pptx
1. idea gen.pptx1. idea gen.pptx
1. idea gen.pptx
 
research.pptx
research.pptxresearch.pptx
research.pptx
 
planning.pptx
planning.pptxplanning.pptx
planning.pptx
 
1. Research.pptx
1. Research.pptx1. Research.pptx
1. Research.pptx
 
proposal .docx
proposal .docxproposal .docx
proposal .docx
 
pre proposal.docx
pre proposal.docxpre proposal.docx
pre proposal.docx
 
4) evaluation.pptx
4) evaluation.pptx4) evaluation.pptx
4) evaluation.pptx
 

new evaluation.pptx

  • 2. Research I think that for audiences I have used my time to research effectively, I am content with how I researched and what I used and how I laid everything out. I looked into multiple different websites that all had different styles and buttons etc. my research helped me a lot during production and planning because it showed me what features make a website successful and also appealing. It also helped me with laying out my features such as buttons, links and photos etc. I think that overall, my research was useful and helped me create my FMP to the best of my ability. It also helped me create my planning section with ease.
  • 3. Planning After research, I began my planning. I think that my research gave me a head start and a good idea of what I wanted to do for my website. I began creating mood boards, brain storms and just creating a general idea of what types of styles, layouts and colours I planned to use. I also had to settle on a theme, design and potential sounds. Once I found what I was happy with I could then develop and improve my ideas. A strength of my planning was having multiple ideas so if something went wrong I always had a backup.
  • 4. Time Management I think that once again I could have managed my time a little better within the writing sections. This meant that I had to rush my evaluation and reflection diary because I wasted time having to check through work looking for any not completed and also for any I have not uploaded. With production, I think my time management has been good, but I could worked more at home since I missed quite a bit of college time. I also wasted a few weeks of working at home because my computer was broken and I couldn’t find my work on my partners computer.
  • 5. Technical Qualities One technical quality for my website has to be the simplistic but still appealing theme, this made it easy to navigate and work around. It also kept you interested since if it was packed with loads of things you could get overwhelmed. Another technical quality could also be how I've used a feature that allowed my photos to rotate on a time schedule which added a nice effect to my website. My website was similar to another website that advertised York to everyone and helped people find places to eat and attractions in general.
  • 6. Aesthetic Qualities I think that one aesthetic quality was the style and theme of my website, I'm really happy with the way I designed the theme and layout of the homepage because I think that it looks professional. I purposely chose red because it is a bold and eye catching colour, to complement the red I chose white and black, I also made sure to add lots of photos to make it more appealing. One weakness was that despite me enjoying how it looks, I feel like I could have added more to make it look even better.
  • 7. Audience Appeal I think that my website successfully appealed to the audiences demands as I kept it simplistic and modern, I also made sure not to over complicate any of the writing I did so it was easier to understand. I also chose more “modern” or just cool- looking in general places as my audiences age range is known for liking and enjoying more “instagramable” places to eat out at. The results from my survey showed that people much prefer eating out in York compared to sight seeing, etc.
  • 8. Feedback 1 • What did you like about the product? – The colours and aesthetic appeal • What improvements could have been made to the product? – More detail
  • 9. Feedback 2 • What did you like about the product? – Design • What improvements could have been made to the product? – Adding more information about the locations chosen
  • 10. Feedback 3 • What did you like about the product? – Extra features like subscribe buttons and map • What improvements could have been made to the product? – details
  • 11. Peer Feedback Summary • What do you agree with from your peer feedback? – I agree that I needed to bulk up my website a little more with location information. • What do you disagree with from your peer feedback? – I think that the theme was nice and complimenting despite being simple
  • 12. Peer Feedback Summary I think that I could improve how I planned the website, my research was good however I could have planned a layout to help me a little more. I also know that out of all, research was my strong point, this meaning next time I will try harder on planning ad production. If I were to redo this, I would make sure to have a finalized plan for my layout, theme etc so all I need to do is execute it.

Editor's Notes

  1. What were the strengths of your research? How did your research help your product? What were the weaknesses of your research? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  2. What were the strengths of your planning? How did your planning help your product? What were the weaknesses of your planning? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  3. Did you manage your time well? Did you complete your project on time or would your products have improved with additional time? What would you have done if you had more time to produce your work?
  4. Compare your work to similar existing products and discuss the similarities and differences
  5. Does your work look good? Was it creative? What aspects of your game’s visuals do you like? What would you improve? How would you improve it? Discuss the strengths and weaknesses
  6. How have you appealed to your target audience? What specific bits of content would appeal to your target audience. Refer to your findings from your questionnaire.
  7. What changes would you make to your product based upon your peer feedback and why?