Spring ISD’s 5-Year Strategic Plan
            vs. NETP
           Adrienne Brown

           Lamar University

            May 13, 2012
Spring ISD
●   Consists of
    –   26 Elementary Schools
    –   7 Middle Schools
         ●   6 traditional
         ●   1 math, science, fine arts academy
    –   6 High Schools
         ●   3 traditional
         ●   1 early college
         ●   1 career academy
         ●   1 online learning
The VISION and MISSION of
                Spring ISD
●   “By 2015, Spring ISD will be recognized nationally
    as a leader among learning organizations and
    known for exemplary student achievement.”
●   “The principal goal of the District is to develop
    students who excel academically, reason and
    solve problems rationally, and act responsibly,
    displaying good character and citizenship.”
Division Mission of Public Relations
              and Technology
●   Promote Spring ISD as a nationally recognized
    learning organization and mobilize District
    resources to achieve the District vision.
Spring ISD 5-year Technology Plan
●   Spring ISD does NOT have a specific technology
    plan.
●   However, Spring ISD’s 5-year Strategic Plan for
    2010-2015 includes some plans for technology.
●   The goals and objectives in Spring ISD’s 5-year
    Strategic Plan can relate somewhat to the goals in
    the National Educational Technology Plan, but
    without incorporating the use of technology.
National Educational Technology Plan
NETP is comprised of 5 categories:
1. Learning
2. Assessment
3. Teaching
4. Infrastructure
5. Productivity
NETP: Learning
●   Prepare students to be active, creative, ethical
    members of a global community
●   Create opportunities for wider and more flexible
    set of learning resources and set of educators
●   Experience tailored learning that addresses
    individual learners, interests, and experiences
Learning: Creating engaging and empowering
   experiences both inside and outside of classroom
            NETP                                 Spring ISD
1.1 Using technology, integrate      ●   Spring ISD’s Plan does not
   critical thinking, complex            mention using technology for
   problem                               this purpose.
   solving, collaboration, and
                                     ●   The “learning” mentioned in the
   multimedia communication
                                         report focuses more on
1.2 Study and enhance                    teachers than students.
   motivation, factual and
   procedural knowledge
1.3 Personalize learning available
   anytime anywhere
NETP: Assessment
●   Place emphasis on formative assessments which
    involve stake holders in the creation, design, and
    using of assessments.
●   Use online learning, student response
    devices, and multimedia to reinforce concepts and
    measure progress.
●   Technology's role should be varied, and used
    analytically to determine the effectiveness and
    adjust policies based on data collected.
Assessment: what matters and use of data from each
      assessment for continuous improvement
                                     NETP
2.1 Learners assessed in the course       2.4 Design assessments from the
   of learning with increase in quality      outset to measure
   and quantity of feedback to               knowledge, skills, and abilities;
   learners                                  rather than english proficiency or
                                             ability to read
2.2 Accelerated design and
   development of assessments             2.5 Parent access to electronic
   through collaboration and                 learning record of their student if
   alignment between educators and           student is under 18 and after age
   experts                                   of 18, access to their own
                                             assessment data
2.3 Students recieve immediate
   feedback through use of game
   formatted assessments
Assessment: what matters and use of data from each
         assessment for continuous improvement
                           Spring ISD

●    Spring ISD’s plans are to develop a “PEAK aligned data
     collection coaching tool” which addresses NETP 2.1
     (Learners assessed in the course of learning with
     increase in quality and quantity of feedback to learners).
●    Spring ISD does not include NETP 2.2 through 2.5 in
     their 5-year Strategic Plan.
NETP: Teaching
●   Teacher is supported individually and in teams to
    connect them to data, content, and learning
    experiences.
●   Teacher creates online learning communities
    comprised of other students, teachers,
    community members, and global experts.
Teaching: Empower and inspire more effective teaching

              NETP                                   Spring ISD
3.1 Use resources and collaborate        ●   “Embed opportunities for
   locally, state, countrywide and           community involvement within
   globally to provide more                  identified criteria.”
   engaging, effective learning
                                         ●   No mention of addressing social
3.2 Continually improve practice and         networking.
   evolve over time though use of
                                         ●   While “at-risk” students were
   social networking
                                             addressed in the Strategic
3.3 Educating vulnerable students in         Plan, technology was not included
   high risk areas via online learning       as a an effective source.
   to be educated by the most
   effective source.
Teaching: Empower and inspire more effective teaching

             NETP                                     Spring ISD
3.4 Making technology an integral        ●   This is not a specific requirement in
   component of teacher preparation          the Strategic Plan;
   courses and field experiences.            however, “implementation of
                                             Google apps for Education for
3.5 Provide participatory/personalized
                                             students” is mentioned.
   online and blended learning
   experiences that embody best          ●   There is no goal mentioned for
   practices                                 “participatory” and/or
                                             “personalized” “online” and/or
                                             “blended learning experiences.”
NETP: Infrastructure
●   Participation and collaboration of different types of
    institutions as partners
●   Requires leadership and commitment of importance to
    transom U.S. education
●   Key features
     –   Broadband everywhere
     –   Personal or school owned devices for everyone
     –   Open resources/ public domain
     –   Increased use of cloud
Infrastructure: where and when you need it

             NETP                                   Spring ISD
4.1 Opportunity for teacher and        ●   “Every class will provide frequent
   students to learn whenever and          opportunities to use technology
   wherever they need                      tools for student learning.”
4.2 Engagement,online learning, and    ●   Their Strategic Plan does not
   assessments to be most effective        address ensuring that all students
   must have 24/7 access and               have a computer (or some other
   devices to get on internet              device) with 24/7 internet access.
4.3 New evaluation and selection of    ●   Broadly mentioned in the Strategic
   instructional materials including       Plan as: “Embed specific
   open educational resources              technology tools and examples into
                                           all curricula.”
Infrastructure: where and when you need it

             NETP                                       Spring ISD
4.4 In-house data collectors/ IT          ●   An in-house data/ IT team is not
   professionals maintain the cloud           specifically mentioned, but
   rather than outsourced brings              implementing “desktop virtualization
   greater efficiency and effectiveness       to extend the life of existing district
                                              hardware for students” is.
4.5 Creating common standards for
   collecting and sharing data and        ●   All campuses will be rated
   broaden markets to increase                “Acceptable” by TEA.
   leverage market advancements           ●   “Collect and monitor data reports
                                              from campuses that detail
4.6 Financial data
                                              achievement
   standards, tools, and records              data, attendance, discipline and
                                              failure rates” (financial data is not
                                              mentioned).
NETP: Productivity
●   Structural changes enable dramatic productivity
    improvements
●   Keep the function of the school the same, while
    changing it's system to reflect the times
●   Rethinking operational and financial sides of
    running a school
Productivity: creating more efficient use of time, money,
                        and staff
              NETP                                    Spring ISD
5.1 Define and start measuring           ●   Learning outcomes are not
   learning outcomes                         mentioned in the Strategic Plan.

5.2 Remove process and structural        ●   Traditional learning environment
   barriers (age, academic, seat-time        remains a unquestioned focus.
   determined groups)                    ●   There is no specific technology plan
5.3 Reports of how technology is             from which to begin reporting such
   actually used within a district           data.
                                         ●   This kind of collaboration (NETP
5.4 Collaboration between P-12 and
                                             5.4) is not addressed.
   higher education are crucial to end
   dropping out and being under
   prepared at each level
Spring ISD Technology by 2015
●   By 2015, even if Spring ISD meets their current
    technology goals sparsely mentioned in their 5-
    year Strategic Plan, they will fall short of what
    technology in 2015 has to offer.
●   The District appears to be unfortunately
    shortsighted.
●   Their rate of implementing new technology is too
    slow.
References
●   Shimabukuro,J. A Glimpse at the 2010 National Education
    Technology Plan. Retrieved May 8, 2012 from
    http://etcjournal.com/2010/11/10/glimpse-transforming-american-
    education-learning-powered-by-technology/
●   National Education Technology Plan 2010. Retrieved May 8, 2012
    from http://www.ed.gov/technology/netp-2010
●   Karen Cator on the NETP. Retrieved May 10, 2012 from
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAEKHQWyYpU
●   Spring ISD 5 Year Strategic Plan. Retrieved May 13, 2012 from:
    www.springisd.org/docs2/ci/5YSP-February-2012.pdf

NETP vs SpringISD

  • 1.
    Spring ISD’s 5-YearStrategic Plan vs. NETP Adrienne Brown Lamar University May 13, 2012
  • 2.
    Spring ISD ● Consists of – 26 Elementary Schools – 7 Middle Schools ● 6 traditional ● 1 math, science, fine arts academy – 6 High Schools ● 3 traditional ● 1 early college ● 1 career academy ● 1 online learning
  • 3.
    The VISION andMISSION of Spring ISD ● “By 2015, Spring ISD will be recognized nationally as a leader among learning organizations and known for exemplary student achievement.” ● “The principal goal of the District is to develop students who excel academically, reason and solve problems rationally, and act responsibly, displaying good character and citizenship.”
  • 4.
    Division Mission ofPublic Relations and Technology ● Promote Spring ISD as a nationally recognized learning organization and mobilize District resources to achieve the District vision.
  • 5.
    Spring ISD 5-yearTechnology Plan ● Spring ISD does NOT have a specific technology plan. ● However, Spring ISD’s 5-year Strategic Plan for 2010-2015 includes some plans for technology. ● The goals and objectives in Spring ISD’s 5-year Strategic Plan can relate somewhat to the goals in the National Educational Technology Plan, but without incorporating the use of technology.
  • 6.
    National Educational TechnologyPlan NETP is comprised of 5 categories: 1. Learning 2. Assessment 3. Teaching 4. Infrastructure 5. Productivity
  • 7.
    NETP: Learning ● Prepare students to be active, creative, ethical members of a global community ● Create opportunities for wider and more flexible set of learning resources and set of educators ● Experience tailored learning that addresses individual learners, interests, and experiences
  • 8.
    Learning: Creating engagingand empowering experiences both inside and outside of classroom NETP Spring ISD 1.1 Using technology, integrate ● Spring ISD’s Plan does not critical thinking, complex mention using technology for problem this purpose. solving, collaboration, and ● The “learning” mentioned in the multimedia communication report focuses more on 1.2 Study and enhance teachers than students. motivation, factual and procedural knowledge 1.3 Personalize learning available anytime anywhere
  • 9.
    NETP: Assessment ● Place emphasis on formative assessments which involve stake holders in the creation, design, and using of assessments. ● Use online learning, student response devices, and multimedia to reinforce concepts and measure progress. ● Technology's role should be varied, and used analytically to determine the effectiveness and adjust policies based on data collected.
  • 10.
    Assessment: what mattersand use of data from each assessment for continuous improvement NETP 2.1 Learners assessed in the course 2.4 Design assessments from the of learning with increase in quality outset to measure and quantity of feedback to knowledge, skills, and abilities; learners rather than english proficiency or ability to read 2.2 Accelerated design and development of assessments 2.5 Parent access to electronic through collaboration and learning record of their student if alignment between educators and student is under 18 and after age experts of 18, access to their own assessment data 2.3 Students recieve immediate feedback through use of game formatted assessments
  • 11.
    Assessment: what mattersand use of data from each assessment for continuous improvement Spring ISD ● Spring ISD’s plans are to develop a “PEAK aligned data collection coaching tool” which addresses NETP 2.1 (Learners assessed in the course of learning with increase in quality and quantity of feedback to learners). ● Spring ISD does not include NETP 2.2 through 2.5 in their 5-year Strategic Plan.
  • 12.
    NETP: Teaching ● Teacher is supported individually and in teams to connect them to data, content, and learning experiences. ● Teacher creates online learning communities comprised of other students, teachers, community members, and global experts.
  • 13.
    Teaching: Empower andinspire more effective teaching NETP Spring ISD 3.1 Use resources and collaborate ● “Embed opportunities for locally, state, countrywide and community involvement within globally to provide more identified criteria.” engaging, effective learning ● No mention of addressing social 3.2 Continually improve practice and networking. evolve over time though use of ● While “at-risk” students were social networking addressed in the Strategic 3.3 Educating vulnerable students in Plan, technology was not included high risk areas via online learning as a an effective source. to be educated by the most effective source.
  • 14.
    Teaching: Empower andinspire more effective teaching NETP Spring ISD 3.4 Making technology an integral ● This is not a specific requirement in component of teacher preparation the Strategic Plan; courses and field experiences. however, “implementation of Google apps for Education for 3.5 Provide participatory/personalized students” is mentioned. online and blended learning experiences that embody best ● There is no goal mentioned for practices “participatory” and/or “personalized” “online” and/or “blended learning experiences.”
  • 15.
    NETP: Infrastructure ● Participation and collaboration of different types of institutions as partners ● Requires leadership and commitment of importance to transom U.S. education ● Key features – Broadband everywhere – Personal or school owned devices for everyone – Open resources/ public domain – Increased use of cloud
  • 16.
    Infrastructure: where andwhen you need it NETP Spring ISD 4.1 Opportunity for teacher and ● “Every class will provide frequent students to learn whenever and opportunities to use technology wherever they need tools for student learning.” 4.2 Engagement,online learning, and ● Their Strategic Plan does not assessments to be most effective address ensuring that all students must have 24/7 access and have a computer (or some other devices to get on internet device) with 24/7 internet access. 4.3 New evaluation and selection of ● Broadly mentioned in the Strategic instructional materials including Plan as: “Embed specific open educational resources technology tools and examples into all curricula.”
  • 17.
    Infrastructure: where andwhen you need it NETP Spring ISD 4.4 In-house data collectors/ IT ● An in-house data/ IT team is not professionals maintain the cloud specifically mentioned, but rather than outsourced brings implementing “desktop virtualization greater efficiency and effectiveness to extend the life of existing district hardware for students” is. 4.5 Creating common standards for collecting and sharing data and ● All campuses will be rated broaden markets to increase “Acceptable” by TEA. leverage market advancements ● “Collect and monitor data reports from campuses that detail 4.6 Financial data achievement standards, tools, and records data, attendance, discipline and failure rates” (financial data is not mentioned).
  • 18.
    NETP: Productivity ● Structural changes enable dramatic productivity improvements ● Keep the function of the school the same, while changing it's system to reflect the times ● Rethinking operational and financial sides of running a school
  • 19.
    Productivity: creating moreefficient use of time, money, and staff NETP Spring ISD 5.1 Define and start measuring ● Learning outcomes are not learning outcomes mentioned in the Strategic Plan. 5.2 Remove process and structural ● Traditional learning environment barriers (age, academic, seat-time remains a unquestioned focus. determined groups) ● There is no specific technology plan 5.3 Reports of how technology is from which to begin reporting such actually used within a district data. ● This kind of collaboration (NETP 5.4 Collaboration between P-12 and 5.4) is not addressed. higher education are crucial to end dropping out and being under prepared at each level
  • 20.
    Spring ISD Technologyby 2015 ● By 2015, even if Spring ISD meets their current technology goals sparsely mentioned in their 5- year Strategic Plan, they will fall short of what technology in 2015 has to offer. ● The District appears to be unfortunately shortsighted. ● Their rate of implementing new technology is too slow.
  • 21.
    References ● Shimabukuro,J. A Glimpse at the 2010 National Education Technology Plan. Retrieved May 8, 2012 from http://etcjournal.com/2010/11/10/glimpse-transforming-american- education-learning-powered-by-technology/ ● National Education Technology Plan 2010. Retrieved May 8, 2012 from http://www.ed.gov/technology/netp-2010 ● Karen Cator on the NETP. Retrieved May 10, 2012 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAEKHQWyYpU ● Spring ISD 5 Year Strategic Plan. Retrieved May 13, 2012 from: www.springisd.org/docs2/ci/5YSP-February-2012.pdf

Editor's Notes

  • #2 Hi, my name is Adrienne Brown, I currently teach 6th grade in Spring Independent School District located in spring tx. This presentation addresses Spring ISD’s current technology plan.
  • #3 Spring ISDconsistes of
  • #4 Spring isd’s vision is…….it’s mission is
  • #5 Public relation and technology is a division within spring isd and it’s is to
  • #6 I was unable to find the technology plan for Spring ISD, but technology principles could be found within the 5 year plan. The goals between the two documents are similar, but spring isd overall does not incorporate using technology to achieve them.
  • #7 Read slide
  • #8 Read slide
  • #9 Spring Isd’s plan does not mention using technology in regards to the purspose of learning acording to NETP / Spring Isd’s plan also focuses on the teacher rather than the student concering learning.
  • #10 Read slide
  • #11 Assessent according to NETP focus on quality quantity of feedback to learners and parents , collaboration and alignment between educators and experts and the use of game formatted assessments
  • #12 Sprence Rodgers, the creator of PEAK learning is a great way for immediate feedback and assessment, but does not incorporate technology. Also, not other aspects of the National plan are addressed in springs plan
  • #13 Read slide
  • #14 While colaboration and reading students with special needs are mentioned in springs plan it does not address it from a technology or social networking viewpoint
  • #15 Neither 3.4 or 3.5 are specifically addressed although the school district recently introduced Google docs as a district resource. Staff was never trained how to use nor implement this tool
  • #17 Like many schools within my district I teach in a low income school. Many students do not have the 24/7 access or even the devices required to get online. Spring ISD as of yet can not ensure that evey student has whenever wherever access and has not gone about trying to find a way to create this opportunity.
  • #18 There currently is not a plan for an in house IT professional nor a plan of how the district will share data. The financial records I could find were very generic and did not address specifically what each amount is going to
  • #19 read
  • #20 Spring ISD is still functioning using the traditional learning environment, therefore outcomes are not defined or measured, reports are not created to address how technology is being used and collaboration is on an individual or school basis.
  • #21 Read slide