This document summarizes the author's exploration of how Google, Bing, and Yahoo handle natural language queries about movies compared to each other. The author demonstrates that Google more consistently returns the correct main movie page from IMDB for queries, while Bing sometimes returns unrelated or incorrect pages. The author suggests this may be because Bing has issues with duplicate indexing of pages and not returning the highest authority page from IMDB. The document concludes by advising users to check for duplicate content issues in Bing and pay attention to how search engines are handling "entities" in search.

1. Case Study: Natural Language Movie
Queries in Google and Bing
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 1

2. It started with this image Justin Briggs
shared via Reddit
In it, someone demonstrates how a natural
language search performs much better in
Google vs Bing and Yahoo, at identifying the
movie “Source Code”.
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 2

3. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 3

4. So I quickly found an example where
Bing performs better, with one of my
favorite movies, Sideways.
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 4

5. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 5

6. But being a bit obsessive, I wanted to
dig deeper….
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 6

7. I had a hunch that the IMDB may be
somehow helping Google with its
results, so lets look at the IMDB page
for “Source Code”
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 7

8. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 8

9. Look at what a cut and paste of a
portion of the “Source Code”
description returns….
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 9

10. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 10

11. Google returns the main movie page
(the “/title”) directory but Bing does
not…. Why??
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 11

12. Let’s try helping Bing out a little bit…
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 12

13. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 13

14. Is that the wrong URL in Bing?
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 14

15. What is IMDB asking the engines to
index?
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 15

16. This URL
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 16

17. How about just searching the movie
ID number in Bing?!
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 17

18. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 18

19. Ugh.
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 19

20. Despite popular belief, I can’t give up now.
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 20

21. I’ll try one more sample of quoted text
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 21

22. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 22

23. Nope.
Finally I get the right URL to show by
adding ‘tt’
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 23

24. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 24

25. Nice!
FYI, quoted text works in Yahoo.
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 25

26. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 26

27. This works in Yahoo too.
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 27

28. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 28

29. Even the movie ID # gets the
right result.
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 29

30. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 30

31. I can get the wrong URL to show by
doing this…
Yahoo is doing better than Bing, but
only slightly…
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 31

32. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 32

33. Not to beat a dead horse… but one
more thing before I move on (there’s
more!)…
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 33

34. Google even adds the forward slash!!!!
What’s going on BING?!
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 34

35. I’m left with questions:
Is Bing ignoring the canonical?
Where does this URL come from?
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 35

36. Enter archive.org
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 36

37. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 37

38. IMDB started 302 redirecting in
October 2003
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 38

39. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 39

40. Let’s go back to Bing and look….
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 40

41. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 41

42. DOH!!
And…. How do they do with a
(pretty damn obvious) natural
language search for the Grinch Stole
Christmas??
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 42

43. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 43

44. Miserable. Epic. Fail.
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 44

45. Let’s ask Google who stole Christmas…
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 45

46. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 46

47. It’s a Christmas celebration
in this house.
Let’s look at one more
example, Sherlock Holmes…
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 47

48. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 48

49. The main movie page (“/title”) does
not rank in Bing for Sherlock Holmes
either…
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 49

50. That sucked….
Why does “Sideways” do so well?
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 50

51. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 51

52. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 52

53. I can’t find the wrong URL in Bing’s
index for Sideways.
Perhaps this is why it outperformed
Google…
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 53

54. The main movie pages in IMDB carry
some serious ranking weight…
If Bing is double indexing and can’t
even return the right one which has all
the links juice and authority, is this
why Google outperforms???
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 54

55. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 55

56. Not the pages Bing returns though….
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 56

57. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 57

58. I’ll try cutting some text from the
Sherlock Holmes movie description
and searching in Bing…
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 58

59. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 59

60. That’s practically an exact match of
the movie title, yet other pages are
ranking about the IMDB page!!
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 60

61. One more thing in Google…
My friend the ‘related:’ search
operator…
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 61

62. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 62

63. Yup. Google returns strong related
writer and movie sites.
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 63

64. @dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 64

65. 15 “Source Code” movie specific pages
in fact.
(Does Bing even have a ‘related:’ search
function?)
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 65

66. Conclusion: Two Quick Takeaways
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 66

67. 1. Check your indexation in Bing.
Even though you’ve added an canonical and redirected an old URL to a new,
this doesn’t mean either engine is going to get it right. Bing is seriously
messing up the right result here. Check for duplicate content issues and
adjust accordingly.
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 67

68. 2. Pay Attention to “Entities”
The whole things that sparked this post, was Justin’s tweet and
post about “entities”. This study shows (to me) obvious movement
towards an entity based algarhythm.
I suggest reading Justin’s post to get a better understanding of
entities.
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 68

69. Thanks… hope this was fun and
informative 
Dan Shure
@dan_shure
www.evolvingseo.com
@dan_shure / www.evolvingseo.com 69