Presentation by Nelcilandia Pereira de Oliveira, Brazil's Ministry of Environment, as part of the NAP Global Network's Targeted Topics Forum held in Nadi, Fiji, in February 2018.
Adaptation M&E and NAP process, session III, III NAP Events
This document discusses monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of national adaptation plans (NAPs) and adaptation processes. It explains that M&E is important to understand if adaptation is occurring, learn lessons, manage adaptation effectively, and attract funding. M&E can assess progress in implementing NAPs and achieving intended goals and outcomes of adaptation interventions. The document provides guidance on developing an M&E system, including clarifying what is being monitored and the purpose, as well as a five-step process. It also discusses challenges in measuring adaptation outcomes and examples of country approaches.
Session iii 3 adaptation m&e and nap processNAP Events
This document discusses monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of national adaptation plans and adaptation processes. It outlines the rationale for M&E, including understanding whether adaptation occurs and learning from experience. M&E can monitor both the NAP process and adaptation outcomes. Challenges to measuring adaptation outcomes include context-specificity and lack of common metrics. The document provides steps to develop an M&E system and examples of how countries monitor adaptation indicators and outcomes. Overall, M&E systems should be tailored to the context and focus first on implementation, then expand to outcomes over time.
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGD Accounting within the NDC cycle by Chao...OECD Environment
This document discusses accounting within the context of the national determined contribution (NDC) cycle. It outlines the key components of tracking progress under an NDC, including describing the NDC, summarizing progress made toward the target, and explaining the accounting approaches and methodologies used. It notes that tracking involves setting reference values for indicators used to measure progress, reporting interim progress during the implementation period using recent indicator values, and reporting the final outcome values after the period.
Monitoring and Evaluation of Adaptation: Key Opportunities and ChallengesNAP Global Network
Presentation by Angélica V. Ospina, IISD, for the webinar "Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) in the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Process."
You can watch a recording of the webinar here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIqbygK6obE
Lessons learned from South Africa on M&E in the NAP processNAP Global Network
Presentation by Dr. Tsepang Makholela (Director of Climate Change Adaptation M&E, Department of Environmental Affairs, South Africa) for the webinar "Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) in the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Process."
You can watch a recording of the webinar here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIqbygK6obE
Developing National Adaptation Monitoring and Evaluation SystemsNAP Global Network
Presentation by Timo Leiter, GIZ, for the webinar "Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) in the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Process."
You can watch a recording of the webinar here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIqbygK6obE
Adaptation M&E and NAP process, session III, III NAP Events
This document discusses monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of national adaptation plans (NAPs) and adaptation processes. It explains that M&E is important to understand if adaptation is occurring, learn lessons, manage adaptation effectively, and attract funding. M&E can assess progress in implementing NAPs and achieving intended goals and outcomes of adaptation interventions. The document provides guidance on developing an M&E system, including clarifying what is being monitored and the purpose, as well as a five-step process. It also discusses challenges in measuring adaptation outcomes and examples of country approaches.
Session iii 3 adaptation m&e and nap processNAP Events
This document discusses monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of national adaptation plans and adaptation processes. It outlines the rationale for M&E, including understanding whether adaptation occurs and learning from experience. M&E can monitor both the NAP process and adaptation outcomes. Challenges to measuring adaptation outcomes include context-specificity and lack of common metrics. The document provides steps to develop an M&E system and examples of how countries monitor adaptation indicators and outcomes. Overall, M&E systems should be tailored to the context and focus first on implementation, then expand to outcomes over time.
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGD Accounting within the NDC cycle by Chao...OECD Environment
This document discusses accounting within the context of the national determined contribution (NDC) cycle. It outlines the key components of tracking progress under an NDC, including describing the NDC, summarizing progress made toward the target, and explaining the accounting approaches and methodologies used. It notes that tracking involves setting reference values for indicators used to measure progress, reporting interim progress during the implementation period using recent indicator values, and reporting the final outcome values after the period.
Monitoring and Evaluation of Adaptation: Key Opportunities and ChallengesNAP Global Network
Presentation by Angélica V. Ospina, IISD, for the webinar "Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) in the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Process."
You can watch a recording of the webinar here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIqbygK6obE
Lessons learned from South Africa on M&E in the NAP processNAP Global Network
Presentation by Dr. Tsepang Makholela (Director of Climate Change Adaptation M&E, Department of Environmental Affairs, South Africa) for the webinar "Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) in the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Process."
You can watch a recording of the webinar here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIqbygK6obE
Developing National Adaptation Monitoring and Evaluation SystemsNAP Global Network
Presentation by Timo Leiter, GIZ, for the webinar "Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) in the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Process."
You can watch a recording of the webinar here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIqbygK6obE
Packaging Adaptation Actions into Programmes, Projects and PoliciesNAP Events
The document discusses packaging adaptation actions from a National Adaptation Plan (NAP) into implementation strategies. It suggests developing an investment framework aligned with funding sources like the Green Climate Fund. The implementation strategy should guide how to execute prioritized adaptation actions through projects, programs, or policies. Considerations for implementation include managing actions in parallel, learning from past projects, and a programmatic or step-wise approach depending on prioritization and scale.
Guidance for accounting: emissions intensity goals and goals relative to BAU ...OECD Environment
This document discusses accounting considerations and guidance needs for different types of mitigation contributions under the Paris Agreement, including emissions intensity goals and goals relative to baseline emissions levels. Key issues addressed include requirements to quantify future emissions in the target year, developing reference levels for corresponding adjustments under cooperative mechanisms, data sources and guidance for intensity targets, defining consistency and review procedures for baseline scenarios, and inclusion of policies and cutoff years. Recommendations are made around enhancing transparency of assumptions in baseline scenarios and including all adopted policies with significant emissions impacts.
The document discusses the major stages and milestones of project cycle management (PCM). It outlines 10 key stages: 1) Programming, 2) Identification, 3) Formulation, 4) Appraisal, 5) Preliminary appraisal, 6) Project application, 7) Appraisal and selection, 8) Negotiations and contracting, 9) Implementation and monitoring, and 10) Evaluation. PCM aims to ensure projects are relevant to policies and strategies, feasible, and have sustainable results. Each stage involves activities by applicants and implementing agencies to develop, assess, approve, and oversee projects.
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGA Accounting for diverse NDCs: Unpacking ...OECD Environment
This document outlines challenges and suggestions for developing accounting guidance for mitigation targets in nationally determined contributions (NDCs). It discusses the meaning of "accounting" for NDCs, challenges such as different target types across parties and land-related issues, and suggestions like drawing from existing approaches under the UNFWP Convention and Kyoto Protocol, allowing parties flexibility in methodologies, and identifying remaining issues to resolve.
GEF's Support and Experience on Capacity Building for Transparency GEF''s, Du...OECD Environment
Capacity building is integral to the Global Environment Facility's (GEF) support for mitigation projects. The GEF has provided $118.9 million for mitigation capacity building in 2015. Capacity building is also a core part of GEF support across all of its focal areas and is highly integrated into project design. The GEF's support for capacity building helps to strengthen institutions, improve strategies and policies, and enable action at the national level over the long term. This includes support for national communications, biennial update reports, nationally determined contributions, and the new Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency.
Tracking Adaptation and Monitoring Development: Experience from KenyaNAP Global Network
Presentation by Paul Kimeu, Kenya's National Drought Management Authority, on "Tracking Adaptation and Monitoring Development: Experience from Kenya" at the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Global Network's Targeted Topics Forum in Lilongwe, Malawi, in February 2017.
PEG M&E tool: a tool for monitoring and reviewing Progress, Effectiveness & G...Tariq A. Deen
The session will provide details on: the tool developed by the LEG for monitoring and evaluating progress, effectiveness and gaps (PEG M&E tool) and its application in the process to formulate and implement NAPs; and the best practices for developing monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems for adaptation at the national level. It will also look at the experiences of countries in developing and applying M&E systems at their national levels.
The document summarizes a workshop on monitoring governance safeguards for REDD+ held in May 2010. It discusses the background and aims of the workshop. The workshop sought to develop a draft framework for core governance parameters to monitor and guidance on tools and institutional arrangements for effective monitoring. Key issues highlighted included ensuring finance and participation, transparency, and access to information. The workshop proposed a draft framework for monitoring three core governance parameters and discussed principles for developing indicators and tools for monitoring governance effectively in a participatory, country-led process.
Tool for Assessing Adaptation in the NDCs (TAAN): Tracking and analysing adap...NAP Global Network
Presentation by Na-Hyeon Shin, GIZ, at the Peer Learning Summit on "The role of the NAP process in NDC implementation" held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Oct 1-2, 2018. This Forum was co-hosted by Thailand's Office of National Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) and the NAP Global Network.
National adaptation M&E and the NAP processNAP Events
This document discusses national monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of adaptation efforts and the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process. It outlines that M&E should focus on both the adaptation process and outcomes. Countries are developing specific M&E systems to understand their adaptation progress and inform reporting under the Paris Agreement. Effective M&E systems address key questions about scope, data needs, and links to other national and international processes.
This document discusses integrating the content and timing of reporting and review provisions under Articles 6 and 13 of the Paris Agreement. It notes that while reporting and review are closely linked, the sequencing is important - reporting guidelines should be decided before review guidelines. Integrating the two poses challenges around capacity, accounting methodologies, and countries' differing experiences. The document proposes forming an expert committee to further address these issues and provide comments on draft texts, with the goal of developing solutions that acknowledge countries' differing capacities while maintaining fairness.
This document outlines the process for developing an Operational Programme (OP) for allocating EU structural funds. It discusses:
1) The requirements and key contents of an OP, including a SWOT analysis, strategic objectives, financial plan, and indicators.
2) The multi-stage OP preparation process, including organizing stakeholders, conducting a SWOT analysis, setting strategic goals and priorities, allocating budgets, and undergoing an ex-ante evaluation.
3) The roles of various stakeholders in the OP development and approval process, which requires coordination between the candidate country, EU, and other national and regional partners.
CCXG Global Forum March 2018, Accounting for baseline targets by Anke HeroldOECD Environment
This document discusses the need for guidance on accounting for baseline targets under the UNFCCC. It outlines experiences using counterfactual scenarios to assess mitigation actions. While projections are not used for target accounting, experiences with transparent reporting and methodologies are relevant. The document analyzes Nationally Determined Contributions and finds varying levels of transparency in describing baseline scenarios. It argues guidance is needed on baseline transparency, technical review processes, ensuring methodological consistency, and updating assumptions over time. The conclusions call for procedural guidance to improve baseline descriptions and review without prescribing methodologies.
Accounting for baseline targets - OECD CCXG Global Forum on the Environment a...Oeko-Institut
Presentation by Anke Herold (Research Coordinator International Climate Policy) at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in Paris, France.
Role of the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process in NDC implementationNAP Global Network
Presentation by Anne Hammill, IISD, at the Peer Learning Summit on "The role of the NAP process in NDC implementation" held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Oct 1-2, 2018. This Forum was co-hosted by Thailand's Office of National Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) and the NAP Global Network.
Presentation by Anika Terton, IISD, at the Peer Learning Summit on "The role of the NAP process in NDC implementation" held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Oct 1-2, 2018. This Forum was co-hosted by Thailand's Office of National Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) and the NAP Global Network.
February 14 | NAP & NDC Linkages - Tools to Identify Synergies: TAAN & Adapta...NAP Global Network
The presentation discusses tools to identify synergies between national adaptation plans (NAPs) and nationally determined contributions (NDCs). It introduces the NAP-NDC Linkages study, the Tool for Assessing Adaptation in the NDCs (TAAN), and the NDC Adaptation Toolbox. The study found that over 130 countries included adaptation in their NDCs. The TAAN allows understanding and comparing adaptation contents and measures in NDCs. The Toolbox is organized along the policy cycle to support NDC implementation through existing NAP guidance and case studies. Aligning NAP and NDC processes can help achieve adaptation goals, avoid duplication, and access finance sources identified in NAPs.
Nina rinnerberger results monitoring and reportingENPI FLEG
1) The document discusses results monitoring for Phase I and Phase II of the FLEG program. It outlines challenges in Phase I monitoring due to a lack of measurable indicators and baseline data.
2) For Phase II, a detailed results framework was developed with indicators to track progress at regional, national and sub-national levels. The framework includes project development objectives (PDO) and intermediate results indicators.
3) Reporting for Phase II will include country-level, organizational-level and program-level reporting according to set frequencies and guidelines. This will allow monitoring of progress toward intended objectives.
Packaging Adaptation Actions into Programmes, Projects and PoliciesNAP Events
The document discusses packaging adaptation actions from a National Adaptation Plan (NAP) into implementation strategies. It suggests developing an investment framework aligned with funding sources like the Green Climate Fund. The implementation strategy should guide how to execute prioritized adaptation actions through projects, programs, or policies. Considerations for implementation include managing actions in parallel, learning from past projects, and a programmatic or step-wise approach depending on prioritization and scale.
Guidance for accounting: emissions intensity goals and goals relative to BAU ...OECD Environment
This document discusses accounting considerations and guidance needs for different types of mitigation contributions under the Paris Agreement, including emissions intensity goals and goals relative to baseline emissions levels. Key issues addressed include requirements to quantify future emissions in the target year, developing reference levels for corresponding adjustments under cooperative mechanisms, data sources and guidance for intensity targets, defining consistency and review procedures for baseline scenarios, and inclusion of policies and cutoff years. Recommendations are made around enhancing transparency of assumptions in baseline scenarios and including all adopted policies with significant emissions impacts.
The document discusses the major stages and milestones of project cycle management (PCM). It outlines 10 key stages: 1) Programming, 2) Identification, 3) Formulation, 4) Appraisal, 5) Preliminary appraisal, 6) Project application, 7) Appraisal and selection, 8) Negotiations and contracting, 9) Implementation and monitoring, and 10) Evaluation. PCM aims to ensure projects are relevant to policies and strategies, feasible, and have sustainable results. Each stage involves activities by applicants and implementing agencies to develop, assess, approve, and oversee projects.
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGA Accounting for diverse NDCs: Unpacking ...OECD Environment
This document outlines challenges and suggestions for developing accounting guidance for mitigation targets in nationally determined contributions (NDCs). It discusses the meaning of "accounting" for NDCs, challenges such as different target types across parties and land-related issues, and suggestions like drawing from existing approaches under the UNFWP Convention and Kyoto Protocol, allowing parties flexibility in methodologies, and identifying remaining issues to resolve.
GEF's Support and Experience on Capacity Building for Transparency GEF''s, Du...OECD Environment
Capacity building is integral to the Global Environment Facility's (GEF) support for mitigation projects. The GEF has provided $118.9 million for mitigation capacity building in 2015. Capacity building is also a core part of GEF support across all of its focal areas and is highly integrated into project design. The GEF's support for capacity building helps to strengthen institutions, improve strategies and policies, and enable action at the national level over the long term. This includes support for national communications, biennial update reports, nationally determined contributions, and the new Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency.
Tracking Adaptation and Monitoring Development: Experience from KenyaNAP Global Network
Presentation by Paul Kimeu, Kenya's National Drought Management Authority, on "Tracking Adaptation and Monitoring Development: Experience from Kenya" at the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Global Network's Targeted Topics Forum in Lilongwe, Malawi, in February 2017.
PEG M&E tool: a tool for monitoring and reviewing Progress, Effectiveness & G...Tariq A. Deen
The session will provide details on: the tool developed by the LEG for monitoring and evaluating progress, effectiveness and gaps (PEG M&E tool) and its application in the process to formulate and implement NAPs; and the best practices for developing monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems for adaptation at the national level. It will also look at the experiences of countries in developing and applying M&E systems at their national levels.
The document summarizes a workshop on monitoring governance safeguards for REDD+ held in May 2010. It discusses the background and aims of the workshop. The workshop sought to develop a draft framework for core governance parameters to monitor and guidance on tools and institutional arrangements for effective monitoring. Key issues highlighted included ensuring finance and participation, transparency, and access to information. The workshop proposed a draft framework for monitoring three core governance parameters and discussed principles for developing indicators and tools for monitoring governance effectively in a participatory, country-led process.
Tool for Assessing Adaptation in the NDCs (TAAN): Tracking and analysing adap...NAP Global Network
Presentation by Na-Hyeon Shin, GIZ, at the Peer Learning Summit on "The role of the NAP process in NDC implementation" held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Oct 1-2, 2018. This Forum was co-hosted by Thailand's Office of National Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) and the NAP Global Network.
National adaptation M&E and the NAP processNAP Events
This document discusses national monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of adaptation efforts and the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process. It outlines that M&E should focus on both the adaptation process and outcomes. Countries are developing specific M&E systems to understand their adaptation progress and inform reporting under the Paris Agreement. Effective M&E systems address key questions about scope, data needs, and links to other national and international processes.
This document discusses integrating the content and timing of reporting and review provisions under Articles 6 and 13 of the Paris Agreement. It notes that while reporting and review are closely linked, the sequencing is important - reporting guidelines should be decided before review guidelines. Integrating the two poses challenges around capacity, accounting methodologies, and countries' differing experiences. The document proposes forming an expert committee to further address these issues and provide comments on draft texts, with the goal of developing solutions that acknowledge countries' differing capacities while maintaining fairness.
This document outlines the process for developing an Operational Programme (OP) for allocating EU structural funds. It discusses:
1) The requirements and key contents of an OP, including a SWOT analysis, strategic objectives, financial plan, and indicators.
2) The multi-stage OP preparation process, including organizing stakeholders, conducting a SWOT analysis, setting strategic goals and priorities, allocating budgets, and undergoing an ex-ante evaluation.
3) The roles of various stakeholders in the OP development and approval process, which requires coordination between the candidate country, EU, and other national and regional partners.
CCXG Global Forum March 2018, Accounting for baseline targets by Anke HeroldOECD Environment
This document discusses the need for guidance on accounting for baseline targets under the UNFCCC. It outlines experiences using counterfactual scenarios to assess mitigation actions. While projections are not used for target accounting, experiences with transparent reporting and methodologies are relevant. The document analyzes Nationally Determined Contributions and finds varying levels of transparency in describing baseline scenarios. It argues guidance is needed on baseline transparency, technical review processes, ensuring methodological consistency, and updating assumptions over time. The conclusions call for procedural guidance to improve baseline descriptions and review without prescribing methodologies.
Accounting for baseline targets - OECD CCXG Global Forum on the Environment a...Oeko-Institut
Presentation by Anke Herold (Research Coordinator International Climate Policy) at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in Paris, France.
Role of the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process in NDC implementationNAP Global Network
Presentation by Anne Hammill, IISD, at the Peer Learning Summit on "The role of the NAP process in NDC implementation" held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Oct 1-2, 2018. This Forum was co-hosted by Thailand's Office of National Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) and the NAP Global Network.
Presentation by Anika Terton, IISD, at the Peer Learning Summit on "The role of the NAP process in NDC implementation" held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Oct 1-2, 2018. This Forum was co-hosted by Thailand's Office of National Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) and the NAP Global Network.
February 14 | NAP & NDC Linkages - Tools to Identify Synergies: TAAN & Adapta...NAP Global Network
The presentation discusses tools to identify synergies between national adaptation plans (NAPs) and nationally determined contributions (NDCs). It introduces the NAP-NDC Linkages study, the Tool for Assessing Adaptation in the NDCs (TAAN), and the NDC Adaptation Toolbox. The study found that over 130 countries included adaptation in their NDCs. The TAAN allows understanding and comparing adaptation contents and measures in NDCs. The Toolbox is organized along the policy cycle to support NDC implementation through existing NAP guidance and case studies. Aligning NAP and NDC processes can help achieve adaptation goals, avoid duplication, and access finance sources identified in NAPs.
Nina rinnerberger results monitoring and reportingENPI FLEG
1) The document discusses results monitoring for Phase I and Phase II of the FLEG program. It outlines challenges in Phase I monitoring due to a lack of measurable indicators and baseline data.
2) For Phase II, a detailed results framework was developed with indicators to track progress at regional, national and sub-national levels. The framework includes project development objectives (PDO) and intermediate results indicators.
3) Reporting for Phase II will include country-level, organizational-level and program-level reporting according to set frequencies and guidelines. This will allow monitoring of progress toward intended objectives.
PEG M&E tool: a tool for monitoring and reviewing Progress, Effectiveness & ...NAP Events
Presented by: Thinley Namgyel
8.3 Monitoring and evaluation
The session will provide details on: the tool developed by the LEG for monitoring and evaluating progress, effectiveness and gaps (PEG M&E tool) and its application in the process to formulate and implement NAPs; and the best practices for developing monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems for adaptation at the national level. It will also look at the experiences of countries in developing and applying M&E systems at their national levels.
OECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium - Andreas BergmannOECD Governance
This presentation by Andreas Bergmann was made at the 14th Annual OECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium, Paris 3-4 March 2014. Find out more at www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/14thannualoecdpublicsectoraccrualssymposiumparis3-4march2014.htm
The document outlines the objectives and agenda of an M&E workshop. It discusses monitoring project identification, planning, implementation, and evaluation. Key points include familiarizing participants with manuals, developing common understandings of M&E, and sharing issues related to M&E. The presentation covers project identification, planning, monitoring, evaluation, information management, and reporting. It also discusses developing a common understanding of planning, monitoring, and evaluation among stakeholders.
This document presents a monitoring and evaluation (M&E) tool called the PEG M&E tool for assessing progress, effectiveness, and gaps in national adaptation plan (NAP) processes. The tool was designed to monitor the overall NAP process using metrics related to process, input, output, outcome, and impact. It is based on the ten essential functions of NAP processes as defined by the Least Developed Countries Expert Group. The document provides an overview of the tool and its principles, as well as examples of metrics that could be used to evaluate specific essential functions of a country's NAP process. Participants at the workshop were then asked to apply elements of the tool to evaluate the NAP process of a selected
The content of National Adaptation M&E Systems | Timo LeiterNAP Global Network
Presentation by Tim Leiter, GIZ, on "The content of National Adaptation M&E Systems" at the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Global Network's Targeted Topics Forum in Lilongwe, Malawi, in February 2017.
The document discusses biodiversity indicators for monitoring the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework agreed upon at COP15. It provides context on the history of biodiversity indicators in CBD discussions and lessons learned. Currently, 26 headline indicators have been agreed for the monitoring framework, but 10 still require methodology development. Issues being discussed include identifying gaps, aggregating and disaggregating data, guidance for parties, and inclusion of all stakeholders. The ad-hoc technical expert group will review existing indicators and provide recommendations to help operationalize the monitoring framework.
The document discusses biodiversity indicators for monitoring the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework agreed upon at COP15. It provides context on the history of biodiversity indicators in CBD discussions and lessons learned. Currently, 26 headline indicators have been agreed for the monitoring framework, but 10 still require methodology development. Issues being discussed include identifying gaps, aggregating and disaggregating data, guidance for parties, and inclusion of all stakeholders. The ad-hoc technical expert group will review existing indicators and provide recommendations to help operationalize the monitoring framework.
E-PASS Inception Project Management and Oversightepass2015
The document discusses the Global Environmental Facility (GEF) and outlines its role in financing projects that benefit global environmental issues. It then summarizes UNDP's responsibilities in implementing GEF-funded projects, including delegation of authority, monitoring and evaluation, and reporting. The document also provides an overview of the typical project cycle from approval through closure. It emphasizes the importance of adaptive management and being responsive to changes during implementation. Key aspects of reporting progress like inception reports and annual project implementation reviews are also summarized. Finally, the document outlines UNDP's risk management system for GEF projects.
Under the facilitation of the EC, SIGMA provided expert support to the discussion regarding conceptual and methodological aspect of strategy development and gave practical examples to help the finalisation of the draft strategy.
Methodological approach for priorization of adaptation projectsNAP Global Network
Presentation by Paola Pulido, Fondo Acción, as part of the webinar "Unlocking NAP Finance: Methodologies for adaptation project formulation", held on May 02, 2019.
The document discusses the development of the WHO's 13th General Programme of Work (GPW13) Results Framework for measuring impact. It provides an update on progress, including developing 46 outcome indicators and milestones aligned with the six GPW13 themes. It outlines next steps in finalizing the framework through additional member state consultations, establishing baselines and milestones, and reporting to the Executive Board and World Health Assembly. The goal is to obtain joint commitment for implementing the framework to measure GPW13 progress and impact.
Building national systems for adaptation Monitoring, Evaulation and Learning ...NAP Global Network
This presentation was given during the parallel session "Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning in the Context of Global Processes and Reporting Progress on NAPs," ," as part of NAP Expo 23, held in Santiago, Chile, from March 27-30, 2023.
The document discusses REGATTA, a regional initiative to support Latin American countries in developing National Adaptation Plans (NAPs). REGATTA facilitates knowledge sharing, funding access, and capacity building for NAP development through an online community of practice, workshops, learning exchanges, and technical assistance. Upcoming events include a webinar on monitoring and evaluation of adaptation processes. REGATTA has supported NAP development through regional training workshops, learning exchanges between countries, and helping countries access funding from the Green Climate Fund Readiness Program.
Monitoring & Evaluation: Colombia's Experience | Juan Pablo Vallejo, DNPNAP Global Network
The document summarizes Colombia's experience with monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of adaptation efforts. It outlines Colombia's M&E system, which aims to provide updated information on reducing vulnerability and increasing climate resilience. The system is multi-scale and process/outcome oriented. Institutionally, M&E is part of Colombia's National Adaptation Plan framework and strategy. Data comes from projects, indicators, and platforms like the National Communication. Challenges include lack of baseline data and integrated information systems, but solutions involve political prioritization, sectoral support, and a new adaptation information system under the NAP Readiness Program.
Similar to Monitoring and Evaluation of NAP: Brazil’s experience | Nelcilandia Pereira de Oliveira, Ministry of Environment, Brazil (20)
Monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) systems for National Adaptation Plan (NAP) processes are essential for countries to track, assess and learn from their progress on adaptation. MEL systems can help countries to understand the effectiveness of their NAP processes, support mutual accountability and transparency to stakeholders, and contribute to learning to accelerate adaptation actions.
Presentation by Sapolu Tetoa and Semisi Tonga, Government of Tuvalu, at the Coalition Of Low-Lying Atoll Nations on Climate Change (CANCC) peer learning cohort workshop on “National Adaptation Planning With a Focus on Coastal Adaptation” in North Malé Atoll, Maldives, between May 1 - May 3, 2024.
Scaling up coastal adaptation in Maldives through the NAP processNAP Global Network
Presentation by Ahmed Jameel (AJ) and Ibrahim Faiz, Water Solutions Ltd., at the Coalition Of Low-Lying Atoll Nations on Climate Change (CANCC) peer learning cohort workshop on “National Adaptation Planning With a Focus on Coastal Adaptation” in North Malé Atoll, Maldives, between May 1 - May 3, 2024.
Presentation by Dr. Orville Grey, Head of Secretariat, NAP Global Network (IISD), at the Coalition Of Low-Lying Atoll Nations on Climate Change (CANCC) peer learning cohort workshop on “National Adaptation Planning With a Focus on Coastal Adaptation” in North Malé Atoll, Maldives, between May 1 - May 3, 2024.
Financing strategies for adaptation. Presentation for CANCCNAP Global Network
Presentation by Maribel Hernandez, NAP Global Network (IISD), at the Coalition Of Low-Lying Atoll Nations on Climate Change (CANCC) peer learning cohort workshop on “National Adaptation Planning With a Focus on Coastal Adaptation” in North Malé Atoll, Maldives, between May 1 - May 3, 2024.
Presentation by the Maldives' Housing Development Corporation at the Coalition Of Low-Lying Atoll Nations on Climate Change (CANCC) peer learning cohort workshop on “National Adaptation Planning With a Focus on Coastal Adaptation” in North Malé Atoll, Maldives, between May 1 - May 3, 2024.
Finance strategies for adaptation. Presentation for CANCCNAP Global Network
Presentation by Alessio Giardino Senior Climate and Coastal Adaptation Specialist, ADB, at the Coalition Of Low-Lying Atoll Nations on Climate Change (CANCC) peer learning cohort workshop on “National Adaptation Planning With a Focus on Coastal Adaptation” in North Malé Atoll, Maldives, between May 1 - May 3, 2024.
An Atoll Futures Research Institute? Presentation for CANCCNAP Global Network
Presentation by Professor Jon Barnett, University of Melbourne, at the Coalition Of Low-Lying Atoll Nations on Climate Change (CANCC) peer learning cohort workshop on “National Adaptation Planning With a Focus on Coastal Adaptation” in North Malé Atoll, Maldives, between May 1 - May 3, 2024.
How inclusive and cross-scale stakeholder engagement can drive transformation...NAP Global Network
The objective of this presentation is to underscore the significance of bolstering inclusive multi-stakeholder engagement for climate change adaptation, especially for the formulation, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of NAPs, while showcasing successful examples that have integrated this approach.
Training on NAPs: Developing and applying monitoring, evaluation and learning...NAP Global Network
As countries shift from planning to implementing adaptation interventions, having functional MEL tools for NAP processes becomes essential to help accelerate adaptation action and finance, ensure accountability and transparency to stakeholders, and contribute to learning from adaptation actions.
Peace-Conflict-and-National-Adaptation-Plan-NAP-Processes-.pdfNAP Global Network
This presentation focuses on how governments operating in peacebuilding contexts can design and implement their NAP process in a way that responds to peace and conflict dynamics.
NAP Expo - Delivering effective and adequate adaptation.pptxNAP Global Network
The Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and the NAP Global Network propose to bring best practices from their respective NAP programmes and projects to showcase how the NAP process can drive transformational adaptation at the local, sub-national and national levels.
Learn more about the adaptation chapter of BTRs and how countries can leverage the outputs and results of their National Adaptation Plan (NAP) processes for their transparency reporting.
Enabling factors for the transition from planning to implementation in the NA...NAP Global Network
Presentation given by Orville Grey, Head of Secretariat, NAP Global Network, as part of the Network's Peer Learning Forum on “The Transition from Planning to Implementation in the NAP Process,” held in Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, from February 27-29, 2024
Presentation given by Michael Mullan, OECD, as part of the NAP Global Network's Peer Learning Forum on “The Transition from Planning to Implementation in the NAP Process,” held in Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, from February 27-29, 2024
Presentation given by Ms. Teneisha Smith and Mr. Sherwyn Greenidge, Antigua & Barbuda, as part of the NAP Global Network's Peer Learning Forum on “The Transition from Planning to Implementation in the NAP Process,” held in Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, from February 27-29, 2024
Adaptation Investment Financing in Africa: AfDB’s ApproachNAP Global Network
Presentation given by Dr Olufunso Somorin, AfDB, as part of the NAP Global Network's Peer Learning Forum on “The Transition from Planning to Implementation in the NAP Process,” held in Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, from February 27-29, 2024
UN WOD 2024 will take us on a journey of discovery through the ocean's vastness, tapping into the wisdom and expertise of global policy-makers, scientists, managers, thought leaders, and artists to awaken new depths of understanding, compassion, collaboration and commitment for the ocean and all it sustains. The program will expand our perspectives and appreciation for our blue planet, build new foundations for our relationship to the ocean, and ignite a wave of action toward necessary change.
RFP for Reno's Community Assistance CenterThis Is Reno
Property appraisals completed in May for downtown Reno’s Community Assistance and Triage Centers (CAC) reveal that repairing the buildings to bring them back into service would cost an estimated $10.1 million—nearly four times the amount previously reported by city staff.
Food safety, prepare for the unexpected - So what can be done in order to be ready to address food safety, food Consumers, food producers and manufacturers, food transporters, food businesses, food retailers can ...
karnataka housing board schemes . all schemesnarinav14
The Karnataka government, along with the central government’s Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY), offers various housing schemes to cater to the diverse needs of citizens across the state. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the major housing schemes available in the Karnataka housing board for both urban and rural areas in 2024.
How To Cultivate Community Affinity Throughout The Generosity JourneyAggregage
This session will dive into how to create rich generosity experiences that foster long-lasting relationships. You’ll walk away with actionable insights to redefine how you engage with your supporters — emphasizing trust, engagement, and community!
Monitoring and Evaluation of NAP: Brazil’s experience | Nelcilandia Pereira de Oliveira, Ministry of Environment, Brazil
1. Targeted Topics Forum (TTF):
Communications, Knowledge Sharing, and Gender in the
National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Process
February 6, 2018 | Nadi, Fiji
Monitoring and Evaluation of NAP
Brazil’s experience
2. Agenda
Brazil – Monitoring and Evaluation of the
National Adaptation Plan (NAP)
• What are we doing?
• Objectives of the M&E system
• First M&E report
• Challenges and Next Steps
3. What are we doing?
May/2016
June/2017
August 2017-
May 2018 July-August
2018
Launching of the NAP
1º M&E Report
(Portuguese and English)
Improvement of
the M&E process
Publication of
the Second
M&E Report
4. General purpose of the M&E system
• Learning;
• Management; and
• Accountability
M&E approach
• Qualitative assessment based in documents
and interviews
• Quantitative and qualitative indicators
5. Objectives of the M&E system
Monitoring
Evaluation Specific
Objectives
• Monitor the integration of
adaptation into planning
• Assessing progress toward
adaptation at national level
• Monitor the achievement of the
proposed goals;
• Monitor the sectorial guidelines
and the adaptation actions of local
governments, the private sector
and society;
• Promote feedback to improve the
policy and its management;
• Promote extensive information on
adaptation actions. Sophistication
Degree of the
M&E system
2017
2020
6. Coordination: Ministry of Environment
Process Monitoring:
Evaluation of the goals implementation
Identification of actions implemented by government
partners in the framework of the NAP guidelines .
Identification of synergies with other national policies
and international frameworks (Ex.: Sustainable
Development Goals, Sendai Framework)
Collection testing of information on adaptation carried
out by the private sector
First M&E Report
Main Characteristics:
11. Challenges and Next Steps
- Quality of the Plan (Policy Design) (Process Ind.)
- Implementation (Process Ind.)
- Results (Result Ind.)
- Impacts (Result Ind.)
Develop Indicators:
-Develop specific indicators
-Monitor the implementation of key issues
NDC
- Expand the reach of the information collection (Federal
government, local governments, private sector, society);
- Improve the collection system and the Flow of information
- Increase the detail of the information (ex. cost of adaptation)
Collection of Information
- Quality of the Plan (Policy Design) (Process Ind.)
- Implementation (Process Ind.)
- Results (Result Ind.)
- Impacts (Result Ind.)
Develop Indicators:
- Quality of the Plan (Policy Design) (Process Ind.)
- Implementation (Process Ind.)
- Results (Result Ind.)
- Impacts (Impact Ind.)
Improve the Indicators system:
12. Challenges and Next Steps
Information Collection Cards as a base of the second report:
13. Thank you !
Obrigada!
Ministry of Environment
Department for Policies on Climate Change
website:
www.mma.gov.br/adaptacao
http://www.mma.gov.br/images/arquivo/80182/GTTm/MonitoringReport.pdf
E-mail:
nelcilandia.oliveira@mma.gov.br