MOBILE FIRST
Cliff Kwan
Verónica Valenzuela
CURRENT MOBILE
PLANNING INFO ARCHITECTURE
 Who is the audience?
 Holiday planners
 Potential clients
 Loyal customers
 Hotel competitors
 What do we want them to do?
 Find all useful information to provoke them to make a
reservation, either at our official website –from any
available device- or at OTA’s
 Find the hotel attractive
PLANNING INFO ARCHITECTURE
 Essential Elements for the mobile experience:
 Hotel Image and Description
 Photo Gallery
 Contact Information
 Social Media Sharing Platform
 Videos
PROPOSED MOBILE SITE
HOW IS THE PROPOSED SITE DIFFERENT?
 Our proposed version is easier to read, and more
attractive through a mobile device.
 The original version is the same one used from a
desktop without taking in consideration the
limitations of mobiles such as the size of the
screen.
 More social media platforms are present in the new
version for making it easier for users to share and
get information from authentic guests.
 The text was simplified, only essential information
was included to prevent the client from getting
bored reading.
CONCLUSIONS
 It is interesting to be involved in the creation of a
mobile website as during the process we needed to
think what is essential to be included, what should
be avoided and how to make it more user-friendly.
 In our opinion, the proposed mobile site
accomplishes the goal of creating a nice experience
for the user and may generate an increase in sales
through the mobile devices.

Mobile first

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
    PLANNING INFO ARCHITECTURE Who is the audience?  Holiday planners  Potential clients  Loyal customers  Hotel competitors  What do we want them to do?  Find all useful information to provoke them to make a reservation, either at our official website –from any available device- or at OTA’s  Find the hotel attractive
  • 4.
    PLANNING INFO ARCHITECTURE Essential Elements for the mobile experience:  Hotel Image and Description  Photo Gallery  Contact Information  Social Media Sharing Platform  Videos
  • 5.
  • 6.
    HOW IS THEPROPOSED SITE DIFFERENT?  Our proposed version is easier to read, and more attractive through a mobile device.  The original version is the same one used from a desktop without taking in consideration the limitations of mobiles such as the size of the screen.  More social media platforms are present in the new version for making it easier for users to share and get information from authentic guests.  The text was simplified, only essential information was included to prevent the client from getting bored reading.
  • 7.
    CONCLUSIONS  It isinteresting to be involved in the creation of a mobile website as during the process we needed to think what is essential to be included, what should be avoided and how to make it more user-friendly.  In our opinion, the proposed mobile site accomplishes the goal of creating a nice experience for the user and may generate an increase in sales through the mobile devices.