The project aimed to identify priority species and create micro reserves to improve habitat connectivity within a 5km radius area in Ceredigion, Wales. Over 700 hours of fieldwork and 3,000 hours of desk research were conducted. A target list of 49 priority species was identified based on habitat requirements and potential for small-scale habitat improvements. Fourteen sites totaling 119 hectares were enrolled as micro reserves to provide increased habitat opportunities and connectivity for target species. While fully achieving all objectives will require ongoing efforts, initial results were promising, with 12% of reserves already implementing habitat improvements benefiting priority species. The project advanced understanding of target species distributions and micro-reserve landowners' recognition of local biodiversity value.
Swarming and Hibernation Project Proposal Annika Binet EcologyAnnika Binet
This document outlines a project to identify autumn swarming and winter hibernation sites of bats in Jersey. The project aims to locate these important habitat sites through desk research, surveys, monitoring, and engagement with stakeholders. Key objectives include identifying potential survey locations, obtaining landowner permission, conducting initial scoping and activity surveys, analyzing recordings to determine bat species present, and mapping important sites to add to the bat roost register for protection. The project will help increase knowledge of bat habitats in Jersey and meet biodiversity targets to identify and safeguard important roost sites.
The document summarizes a presentation on using landscape design to benefit water quality, wildlife, and agriculture. It discusses Landscape Conservation Cooperatives, an initiative involving 22 regions across North America. Specifically, it focuses on the Mississippi River Basin/Gulf Hypoxia Initiative, which aims to provide tools to target conservation investments that improve wildlife habitat while addressing agriculture, water quality, and hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. Example strategies discussed include riparian buffers, wetland restoration, cover crops, and restored connectivity. Metrics include species populations and water quality indicators.
The document discusses the Resource Stewardship Evaluation (RSE) tool provided by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to assess resource stewardship on agricultural operations. RSE pairs key stewardship indicators and evaluation methods to analyze nationally important resource concerns. It is designed to support and enhance conservation planning. The benefits of RSE include improving communication, recognizing stewardship, empowering producers, maximizing conservation investments, and encouraging comprehensive planning. The document provides perspectives on RSE from a client, district conservationist, and state trainer in Iowa and discusses opportunities for RSE to partner with organizations like the National Association of Conservation Districts and supply chains.
This document outlines a precision conservation blueprint to address challenges in the Mississippi River Basin and Gulf of Mexico. The blueprint aims to benefit species conservation, water quality, and agricultural production through a three step process. The first step identifies priority landscapes where conservation interests, water quality issues, and agricultural activities overlap. The second step identifies specific site-scale opportunities within those landscapes. The third step evaluates the landscape context of identified sites. The goal is to target conservation efforts to areas that provide maximum multi-benefit returns. Maps and data are made available online to support decision making and implementation.
During last year’s partnership meeting, partners asked whether GFW should monitor land and forest values beyond trees. Since then, several GFW partners have been developing new approaches for monitoring land cover, land use, and values such as biodiversity, carbon, and water. Discussion topics include: what are needs for a monitoring system beyond forest area (e.g. for climate and biodiversity)? What role should GFW play in advancing new monitoring approaches? Which monitoring needs should we prioritize first?
This document outlines a precision conservation initiative across the Mississippi River Basin to address issues impacting wildlife, water quality, and agriculture from the prairies to the Gulf of Mexico. It proposes integrating the efforts of various agencies and organizations using spatial analysis and targeted practices. The initiative would identify 12 high-impact conservation practices and focus on 6 Midwest watersheds. It would develop pilot projects in the Lower Wabash Floodplain and Decatur County, Indiana to test the approach at smaller scales. Applied research on human dimensions and integrated performance metrics is also proposed. The overall goal is to leverage conservation efforts across sectors for multiple benefits.
- The study examined the relationship between white-tailed deer browsing intensity and proximity to roads and trails at four sites on the Huyck Preserve.
- Deer browsing intensity increased with distance from roads, suggesting roads reduce browsing by increasing perceptions of predation risk. However, browsing did not differ with distance from trails.
- Foliage coverage declined with increasing distance from both roads and trails. Near roads, higher browsing levels were correlated with lower foliage coverage.
- The results indicate roads impact deer browsing behaviors and interior forest regeneration, but trails do not appear to influence deer or have negative effects on vegetation.
This is part 2 of the 14th lesson of the course - Indigenous Knowledge Systems taught to Master Students in Agriculture at the Faculty of Agriculture, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka
Swarming and Hibernation Project Proposal Annika Binet EcologyAnnika Binet
This document outlines a project to identify autumn swarming and winter hibernation sites of bats in Jersey. The project aims to locate these important habitat sites through desk research, surveys, monitoring, and engagement with stakeholders. Key objectives include identifying potential survey locations, obtaining landowner permission, conducting initial scoping and activity surveys, analyzing recordings to determine bat species present, and mapping important sites to add to the bat roost register for protection. The project will help increase knowledge of bat habitats in Jersey and meet biodiversity targets to identify and safeguard important roost sites.
The document summarizes a presentation on using landscape design to benefit water quality, wildlife, and agriculture. It discusses Landscape Conservation Cooperatives, an initiative involving 22 regions across North America. Specifically, it focuses on the Mississippi River Basin/Gulf Hypoxia Initiative, which aims to provide tools to target conservation investments that improve wildlife habitat while addressing agriculture, water quality, and hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. Example strategies discussed include riparian buffers, wetland restoration, cover crops, and restored connectivity. Metrics include species populations and water quality indicators.
The document discusses the Resource Stewardship Evaluation (RSE) tool provided by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to assess resource stewardship on agricultural operations. RSE pairs key stewardship indicators and evaluation methods to analyze nationally important resource concerns. It is designed to support and enhance conservation planning. The benefits of RSE include improving communication, recognizing stewardship, empowering producers, maximizing conservation investments, and encouraging comprehensive planning. The document provides perspectives on RSE from a client, district conservationist, and state trainer in Iowa and discusses opportunities for RSE to partner with organizations like the National Association of Conservation Districts and supply chains.
This document outlines a precision conservation blueprint to address challenges in the Mississippi River Basin and Gulf of Mexico. The blueprint aims to benefit species conservation, water quality, and agricultural production through a three step process. The first step identifies priority landscapes where conservation interests, water quality issues, and agricultural activities overlap. The second step identifies specific site-scale opportunities within those landscapes. The third step evaluates the landscape context of identified sites. The goal is to target conservation efforts to areas that provide maximum multi-benefit returns. Maps and data are made available online to support decision making and implementation.
During last year’s partnership meeting, partners asked whether GFW should monitor land and forest values beyond trees. Since then, several GFW partners have been developing new approaches for monitoring land cover, land use, and values such as biodiversity, carbon, and water. Discussion topics include: what are needs for a monitoring system beyond forest area (e.g. for climate and biodiversity)? What role should GFW play in advancing new monitoring approaches? Which monitoring needs should we prioritize first?
This document outlines a precision conservation initiative across the Mississippi River Basin to address issues impacting wildlife, water quality, and agriculture from the prairies to the Gulf of Mexico. It proposes integrating the efforts of various agencies and organizations using spatial analysis and targeted practices. The initiative would identify 12 high-impact conservation practices and focus on 6 Midwest watersheds. It would develop pilot projects in the Lower Wabash Floodplain and Decatur County, Indiana to test the approach at smaller scales. Applied research on human dimensions and integrated performance metrics is also proposed. The overall goal is to leverage conservation efforts across sectors for multiple benefits.
- The study examined the relationship between white-tailed deer browsing intensity and proximity to roads and trails at four sites on the Huyck Preserve.
- Deer browsing intensity increased with distance from roads, suggesting roads reduce browsing by increasing perceptions of predation risk. However, browsing did not differ with distance from trails.
- Foliage coverage declined with increasing distance from both roads and trails. Near roads, higher browsing levels were correlated with lower foliage coverage.
- The results indicate roads impact deer browsing behaviors and interior forest regeneration, but trails do not appear to influence deer or have negative effects on vegetation.
This is part 2 of the 14th lesson of the course - Indigenous Knowledge Systems taught to Master Students in Agriculture at the Faculty of Agriculture, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka
Coastal Resiliency Planning and Ecosystem Enhancement for Northeastern Massachusetts (NFWF Hurricane Sandy Coastal Resiliency Competitive Grant Program)
Peter Phippen, Coastal Coordinator, 8 Towns and the Great Marsh/Merrimack Valley Planning Commission
Wayne Castonguay, Executive Director, Ipswich River Watershed Association
A Kenya coast perspective. By Ms. Khyria Karama from KMFRI, KenyaweADAPT
KMFRI is a state corporation established in 1979 to conduct integrated and multidisciplinary research on fisheries, aquaculture, natural products, post-harvest losses, environmental issues, and socio-economics. Its mandate is to generate information for sustainable exploitation and conservation of aquatic resources. KMFRI has partnerships for projects at national, local, regional, and international levels. The document discusses KMFRI's role in a project focused on community-based organizations and coastal activities along Kenya's 640km coastline, including fishing, seaweed farming, and destructive fishing practices. It concludes that KMFRI will continue to support further research and information generation to promote sustainability.
Module 4B - EN - Promoting data use II: use in key scientific and policy areasAlberto González-Talaván
The document discusses three key cases: invasive alien species including building an official list for Mexico; conservation planning including examples from Mexico of using species occurrence data and software to identify priority sites; and climate change impacts and adaptation. It also discusses using data on invasive species, conservation planning, and climate impacts in key scientific and policy areas.
The presentation of the CESAB group gaspar at the 2016 french ecology conference in the FRB-CESAB session "Using a treasury of knowledge to tackle complex ecological questions." Presenter: Michel Kulbicki
This study assessed the biodiversity of finfish within and around the Admiral Cockburn Land and Sea National Park MPA near South Caicos. Underwater visual surveys were conducted at 6 sites inside and 6 sites outside the MPA boundary. Species abundance and diversity were calculated using density scores and Shannon-Wiener indices. Results found no significant difference in diversity between sites inside and outside the MPA. This suggests the MPA was not effectively protecting biodiversity, possibly due to being established without scientific planning or lack of connectivity between protected areas. While density scores provided abundance data, Shannon-Wiener indices were needed to accurately compare diversity between sites for MPA assessment.
Biodiversity informatics and the agricultural data landscapeCyndy Parr
Introductory talk of a symposium on Agrobiodiversity informatics at the 2016 annual meeting of the Biodiversity Information Standards. Begins with an overview of the symposium and its speakers, and then launches into my talk.
R-selection refers to species that live in unstable environments and produce many cheap offspring, while K-selection refers to species that live in stable environments and produce few expensive offspring. Key differences are that r-selected species have highly variable populations with early reproduction and many offspring, while K-selected species have small populations with a higher risk of inbreeding and later reproduction after parental care. Characteristics of r-strategists include small size, low energy per offspring, short lifespan and multiple reproduction, while K-strategists have the opposite traits. The terms r and k come from the logistic growth equation.
The Comox Valley Conservatin Strategy is an ecosystem-based conservation plan for the protection and restoration of natural areas and sensitive ecosystems of the Comox Valley.
This document discusses partnerships between Oregon Tilth and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to support organic producers. The number of organic farms and consumer demand for organic products has increased, leading to more interaction between organic producers and agricultural agencies. Oregon Tilth and NRCS established a national partnership in 2010 to share the costs of an organic conservation specialist position. This partnership provides trainings, webinars, and technical resources to NRCS on organic agriculture and helps NRCS better serve organic farmers through practices that support the national organic standards. There are opportunities to better translate organic regulations into conservation language and practices to bridge NRCS support and organic certification requirements.
Saving our Species is a new conservation program launched by the NSW Government that aims to secure threatened species in the wild for 100 years. It differs from previous programs by aligning all conservation efforts under one framework, assigning species to management streams based on their needs, and encouraging community participation. The six management streams are site-managed species, iconic species, data-deficient species, landscape-managed species, partnership species, and keep watch species. Priority actions focus on site-managed, iconic, data-deficient, and landscape-managed species through targeted conservation projects, research, and landscape-scale management.
This document summarizes a study that developed habitat suitability models for four cephalopod species (Todaropsis eblanae, Illex coindetii, Eledone moschata, and Eledone cirrhosa) in the Strait of Sicily using data on species densities and environmental variables collected from 1998-2011. Generalized additive models were used to relate species presence/absence and abundance to depth, slope, rugosity, salinity, temperature, chlorophyll-a, and light levels. The models showed different habitat preferences between species that relate to environmental conditions. Predictive maps highlighted key habitat areas that can inform conservation efforts in the region. Further analysis of long-term trends is planned.
This document defines key terms related to natural resource economics and explains why studying it is important. Natural resources are aspects of nature that are useful to humans, and natural resource economics applies economic principles to manage resources efficiently for both current and future human needs. It involves evaluating the costs and benefits of decisions regarding resources. The document also classifies natural resources into different categories such as flow versus fund resources, and renewable versus nonrenewable. Overall, natural resource economics improves resource management and decision-making by incorporating economic considerations into how we understand and utilize the natural world.
Range-wide Conservation Strategy for the Gopher Tortoise (Draft)usfwssoutheast
This presentation accompanied a webinar presented by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and SEAFWA on August 22, 2012. For more information visit http://www.fws.gov/southeast/candi
This slideshow highlights the first-ever multinational Eco-Audit of the Mesoamerican Reef.
The Eco-Audit evaluates efforts to protect and sustainably manage the region’s coral reefs, celebrates management success stories, and documents the extent to which recommended management actions have been implemented in Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, and Mexico.
Visit wri.org/reefs to learn more about the World Resources Institute’s collaboration with the Healthy Reef Initiative to develop and implement the Eco-Audit of the Mesoamerican Reef.
Power to the People: Nature and science benefit when people are engagedConnectingWithTheCrowd
Professor Dan Rubenstein
Class of 1877 Professor of Zoology.
Professor of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology.
Director, Program in African Studies.
Princeton University
Connecting With The Crowd Conference, London, 16 June 2017
Power to the People: Nature and science benefit when people are engaged
Science is a special way of knowing. But it should not be limited to a professional class of highly educated and skilled people. The earliest naturalists were ordinary people interested in the workings of the world around them. They noticed and recorded abundance patterns of wild forms and noted changes in their status over time. But as the quest for understanding underlying mechanisms and patterns of causation grew and required the use of sophisticated equipment or mathematical modelling, everyday people interested in nature became divorced from a sophisticated science bent on identifying underlying rules. Ironically, today's sophisticated and accessible technological gadgets - from computers to cameras to drones and more - can become the tools that reconnect people with the natural world. Crowdsourcing the analysis of data has helped scientists find patterns that have eluded the cleverest of computer algorithms. Engaging the public via the web enhances people’s self worth and continues to be a great way for arm-chair naturalists to help scientists solve some thorny problems. Swarms of people armed with smartphones scour landscapes snapping pictures of buds bursting or butterflies alighting to help scientists chronicle plant and animal dynamics over spatial and temporal scales unimaginable in the past. While all these activities connect people with the environment and create new scientific knowledge, they are only a beginning. People should and can do much more. In my talk I will champion the notion that truly transforming people to heed the ‘Call of the Wild' and support science as a special way of knowing requires deepening partnerships between professional and amateur researchers. Mentoring volunteers will give them an appreciation of the important issues, the confidence to ask questions, the insights to frame problems and environmental voices to demand action. And when the voices become synchronized they will be hard to ignore, thus generating evidence-based environmental policy and fostering strong and enduring science-society relationships.
This document discusses r and K selection theory, which seeks to explain how traits evolve in response to environmental variation and mortality. It examines how traits are interrelated and constrained by ecology. R and K selection theory predicts demographic responses to disturbances at different spatial and temporal scales. The most notable example is MacArthur and Wilson's theory of r and K selection based on island biogeography. R-selected species thrive in variable environments and have high fecundity, while K-selected species exist in stable environments and invest more in parental care and fewer offspring. The r and K classification represents ends of a continuum, with most species falling somewhere in between.
Brian Kingzett from the Centre for Shellfish Research at Vancouver Island University gave a presentation about sea cucumber aquaculture research. The CSR is exploring sea cucumber farming as an opportunity for coastal communities. Research questions need to be addressed regarding environmental impacts, tracking farmed stocks, and hatchery rearing. Sea cucumbers are important to Asian medicine, overfished globally, and have high market value, making them a potential candidate for extensive aquaculture in BC. The CSR is conducting field research and seeking industry partnerships to develop science-based policy around sea cucumber farming.
The document summarizes a study that used a climate model to predict how climate change may impact the spatial distribution of freshwater snails that transmit parasites in Zimbabwe. The study found:
1) Snail habitat suitability in Zimbabwe varies currently, with some high suitability areas and low suitability areas.
2) Future climate change may cause a reduced spatial distribution of suitable habitat for most snail species by 2100, but the habitat of one snail species may increase by 2055 before declining.
3) Temperature appears to be a main driver of suitable snail habitat and climate change is expected to impact the transmission of parasites that rely on these snail species.
R and k selection is very important aspect of knowing ecology a better way. This is based on natural selection of species (that is stable condition leads to k selection & unstable one leads to r selection).
The document discusses how to use the Or filter in Mule applications. The Or filter allows a message to proceed through a flow if any of its expression filters evaluate to true. An example flow is provided that uses an Or filter to check if the request payload contains "mule" or "soft", logging "Success" if either expression is true. The Or filter provides a simple way to implement logical OR operations to specify complex conditional logic.
El documento resume conceptos clave de morfología, sintaxis y morfosintaxis. Explica que la morfología estudia la estructura interna de las palabras, mientras que la sintaxis describe cómo se combinan las palabras para formar oraciones. La morfosintaxis integra ambos análisis al estudiar la estructura morfológica y sintáctica de una oración. También describe los diferentes tipos de oraciones según el hablante: enunciativas, interrogativas, dubitativas, exhortativas y exclamativas.
Coastal Resiliency Planning and Ecosystem Enhancement for Northeastern Massachusetts (NFWF Hurricane Sandy Coastal Resiliency Competitive Grant Program)
Peter Phippen, Coastal Coordinator, 8 Towns and the Great Marsh/Merrimack Valley Planning Commission
Wayne Castonguay, Executive Director, Ipswich River Watershed Association
A Kenya coast perspective. By Ms. Khyria Karama from KMFRI, KenyaweADAPT
KMFRI is a state corporation established in 1979 to conduct integrated and multidisciplinary research on fisheries, aquaculture, natural products, post-harvest losses, environmental issues, and socio-economics. Its mandate is to generate information for sustainable exploitation and conservation of aquatic resources. KMFRI has partnerships for projects at national, local, regional, and international levels. The document discusses KMFRI's role in a project focused on community-based organizations and coastal activities along Kenya's 640km coastline, including fishing, seaweed farming, and destructive fishing practices. It concludes that KMFRI will continue to support further research and information generation to promote sustainability.
Module 4B - EN - Promoting data use II: use in key scientific and policy areasAlberto González-Talaván
The document discusses three key cases: invasive alien species including building an official list for Mexico; conservation planning including examples from Mexico of using species occurrence data and software to identify priority sites; and climate change impacts and adaptation. It also discusses using data on invasive species, conservation planning, and climate impacts in key scientific and policy areas.
The presentation of the CESAB group gaspar at the 2016 french ecology conference in the FRB-CESAB session "Using a treasury of knowledge to tackle complex ecological questions." Presenter: Michel Kulbicki
This study assessed the biodiversity of finfish within and around the Admiral Cockburn Land and Sea National Park MPA near South Caicos. Underwater visual surveys were conducted at 6 sites inside and 6 sites outside the MPA boundary. Species abundance and diversity were calculated using density scores and Shannon-Wiener indices. Results found no significant difference in diversity between sites inside and outside the MPA. This suggests the MPA was not effectively protecting biodiversity, possibly due to being established without scientific planning or lack of connectivity between protected areas. While density scores provided abundance data, Shannon-Wiener indices were needed to accurately compare diversity between sites for MPA assessment.
Biodiversity informatics and the agricultural data landscapeCyndy Parr
Introductory talk of a symposium on Agrobiodiversity informatics at the 2016 annual meeting of the Biodiversity Information Standards. Begins with an overview of the symposium and its speakers, and then launches into my talk.
R-selection refers to species that live in unstable environments and produce many cheap offspring, while K-selection refers to species that live in stable environments and produce few expensive offspring. Key differences are that r-selected species have highly variable populations with early reproduction and many offspring, while K-selected species have small populations with a higher risk of inbreeding and later reproduction after parental care. Characteristics of r-strategists include small size, low energy per offspring, short lifespan and multiple reproduction, while K-strategists have the opposite traits. The terms r and k come from the logistic growth equation.
The Comox Valley Conservatin Strategy is an ecosystem-based conservation plan for the protection and restoration of natural areas and sensitive ecosystems of the Comox Valley.
This document discusses partnerships between Oregon Tilth and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to support organic producers. The number of organic farms and consumer demand for organic products has increased, leading to more interaction between organic producers and agricultural agencies. Oregon Tilth and NRCS established a national partnership in 2010 to share the costs of an organic conservation specialist position. This partnership provides trainings, webinars, and technical resources to NRCS on organic agriculture and helps NRCS better serve organic farmers through practices that support the national organic standards. There are opportunities to better translate organic regulations into conservation language and practices to bridge NRCS support and organic certification requirements.
Saving our Species is a new conservation program launched by the NSW Government that aims to secure threatened species in the wild for 100 years. It differs from previous programs by aligning all conservation efforts under one framework, assigning species to management streams based on their needs, and encouraging community participation. The six management streams are site-managed species, iconic species, data-deficient species, landscape-managed species, partnership species, and keep watch species. Priority actions focus on site-managed, iconic, data-deficient, and landscape-managed species through targeted conservation projects, research, and landscape-scale management.
This document summarizes a study that developed habitat suitability models for four cephalopod species (Todaropsis eblanae, Illex coindetii, Eledone moschata, and Eledone cirrhosa) in the Strait of Sicily using data on species densities and environmental variables collected from 1998-2011. Generalized additive models were used to relate species presence/absence and abundance to depth, slope, rugosity, salinity, temperature, chlorophyll-a, and light levels. The models showed different habitat preferences between species that relate to environmental conditions. Predictive maps highlighted key habitat areas that can inform conservation efforts in the region. Further analysis of long-term trends is planned.
This document defines key terms related to natural resource economics and explains why studying it is important. Natural resources are aspects of nature that are useful to humans, and natural resource economics applies economic principles to manage resources efficiently for both current and future human needs. It involves evaluating the costs and benefits of decisions regarding resources. The document also classifies natural resources into different categories such as flow versus fund resources, and renewable versus nonrenewable. Overall, natural resource economics improves resource management and decision-making by incorporating economic considerations into how we understand and utilize the natural world.
Range-wide Conservation Strategy for the Gopher Tortoise (Draft)usfwssoutheast
This presentation accompanied a webinar presented by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and SEAFWA on August 22, 2012. For more information visit http://www.fws.gov/southeast/candi
This slideshow highlights the first-ever multinational Eco-Audit of the Mesoamerican Reef.
The Eco-Audit evaluates efforts to protect and sustainably manage the region’s coral reefs, celebrates management success stories, and documents the extent to which recommended management actions have been implemented in Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, and Mexico.
Visit wri.org/reefs to learn more about the World Resources Institute’s collaboration with the Healthy Reef Initiative to develop and implement the Eco-Audit of the Mesoamerican Reef.
Power to the People: Nature and science benefit when people are engagedConnectingWithTheCrowd
Professor Dan Rubenstein
Class of 1877 Professor of Zoology.
Professor of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology.
Director, Program in African Studies.
Princeton University
Connecting With The Crowd Conference, London, 16 June 2017
Power to the People: Nature and science benefit when people are engaged
Science is a special way of knowing. But it should not be limited to a professional class of highly educated and skilled people. The earliest naturalists were ordinary people interested in the workings of the world around them. They noticed and recorded abundance patterns of wild forms and noted changes in their status over time. But as the quest for understanding underlying mechanisms and patterns of causation grew and required the use of sophisticated equipment or mathematical modelling, everyday people interested in nature became divorced from a sophisticated science bent on identifying underlying rules. Ironically, today's sophisticated and accessible technological gadgets - from computers to cameras to drones and more - can become the tools that reconnect people with the natural world. Crowdsourcing the analysis of data has helped scientists find patterns that have eluded the cleverest of computer algorithms. Engaging the public via the web enhances people’s self worth and continues to be a great way for arm-chair naturalists to help scientists solve some thorny problems. Swarms of people armed with smartphones scour landscapes snapping pictures of buds bursting or butterflies alighting to help scientists chronicle plant and animal dynamics over spatial and temporal scales unimaginable in the past. While all these activities connect people with the environment and create new scientific knowledge, they are only a beginning. People should and can do much more. In my talk I will champion the notion that truly transforming people to heed the ‘Call of the Wild' and support science as a special way of knowing requires deepening partnerships between professional and amateur researchers. Mentoring volunteers will give them an appreciation of the important issues, the confidence to ask questions, the insights to frame problems and environmental voices to demand action. And when the voices become synchronized they will be hard to ignore, thus generating evidence-based environmental policy and fostering strong and enduring science-society relationships.
This document discusses r and K selection theory, which seeks to explain how traits evolve in response to environmental variation and mortality. It examines how traits are interrelated and constrained by ecology. R and K selection theory predicts demographic responses to disturbances at different spatial and temporal scales. The most notable example is MacArthur and Wilson's theory of r and K selection based on island biogeography. R-selected species thrive in variable environments and have high fecundity, while K-selected species exist in stable environments and invest more in parental care and fewer offspring. The r and K classification represents ends of a continuum, with most species falling somewhere in between.
Brian Kingzett from the Centre for Shellfish Research at Vancouver Island University gave a presentation about sea cucumber aquaculture research. The CSR is exploring sea cucumber farming as an opportunity for coastal communities. Research questions need to be addressed regarding environmental impacts, tracking farmed stocks, and hatchery rearing. Sea cucumbers are important to Asian medicine, overfished globally, and have high market value, making them a potential candidate for extensive aquaculture in BC. The CSR is conducting field research and seeking industry partnerships to develop science-based policy around sea cucumber farming.
The document summarizes a study that used a climate model to predict how climate change may impact the spatial distribution of freshwater snails that transmit parasites in Zimbabwe. The study found:
1) Snail habitat suitability in Zimbabwe varies currently, with some high suitability areas and low suitability areas.
2) Future climate change may cause a reduced spatial distribution of suitable habitat for most snail species by 2100, but the habitat of one snail species may increase by 2055 before declining.
3) Temperature appears to be a main driver of suitable snail habitat and climate change is expected to impact the transmission of parasites that rely on these snail species.
R and k selection is very important aspect of knowing ecology a better way. This is based on natural selection of species (that is stable condition leads to k selection & unstable one leads to r selection).
The document discusses how to use the Or filter in Mule applications. The Or filter allows a message to proceed through a flow if any of its expression filters evaluate to true. An example flow is provided that uses an Or filter to check if the request payload contains "mule" or "soft", logging "Success" if either expression is true. The Or filter provides a simple way to implement logical OR operations to specify complex conditional logic.
El documento resume conceptos clave de morfología, sintaxis y morfosintaxis. Explica que la morfología estudia la estructura interna de las palabras, mientras que la sintaxis describe cómo se combinan las palabras para formar oraciones. La morfosintaxis integra ambos análisis al estudiar la estructura morfológica y sintáctica de una oración. También describe los diferentes tipos de oraciones según el hablante: enunciativas, interrogativas, dubitativas, exhortativas y exclamativas.
This document provides a classroom project plan for teaching English prepositions to students using a teddy bear and box as props. The plan involves working twice a week to fill in blanks, choose the correct preposition, and have an oral lesson with the teddy bear and box. The overall goal is to help students improve their communicative skills in English by recognizing the differences between English and Spanish prepositions. Students will be assessed on their ability to recognize each preposition and its proper use to gauge if the objective of comprehending English prepositions was achieved.
The document describes a new business called Company Daluser in Pontevedra, Spain that offers driving simulators for cars and motorbikes to help people prepare for licenses or have fun with family, along with mini-carts served by employees and ping-pong, billiards, and music. The business aims to provide a place for families to spend quality time together.
Este documento presenta una práctica sobre nuevas tendencias en tecnologías de la información realizada por tres estudiantes. Incluye preguntas sobre el aprovechamiento de la información en la web, tipos de bases de datos NoSQL, los principios ACID en estas bases de datos, la tecnología MapReduce y ejemplos de su uso. También identifica problemas comunes de las bases de datos NoSQL como su falta de madurez y estandarización.
1. The document discusses various nanoparticles (NPs) and their applications in medical imaging techniques such as X-ray CT, PET, and MRI. Gold NPs and iron oxide NPs are highlighted.
2. For MRI, iron oxide NPs can act as contrast agents by enhancing the relaxation of water protons. Superparamagnetic iron oxide NPs consisting of a magnetite or maghemite core coated with dextran or polymers are promising MRI contrast agents.
3. The formation methods of various NPs are described, including controlling size and coating to influence properties like plasma half-life. Cationic liposome coated magnetite NPs have also been investigated for their cell membrane interaction and uptake.
This document summarizes research on fabricating and characterizing nanostructured films containing both conducting poly(o-ethoxyaniline) (POEA) and magnetic maghemite nanoparticles. The layer-by-layer technique was used to deposit films by alternately dipping substrates in POEA and sulfonated polystyrene (PSS) solutions, with some POEA solutions additionally containing maghemite nanoparticles. Characterization found the POEA remained doped in the films and a similar conductivity was observed even when maghemite nanoparticles were incorporated. Magnetic measurements also indicated the maghemite nanoparticles were incorporated in the film. The research demonstrates the feasibility of obtaining nanocomposite films exhibiting both conducting and magnetic properties using the layer
Porous Covalent Triazine Polymer as a Potential Nanocargo for Cancer Therapy ...Arun kumar
A microporous covalent triazine polymer (CTP) network with a high surface area was synthesized via the Friedel-Crafts reaction for anticancer drug delivery and controlled release. The CTP is transformed to the nanoscale region by intense ultasonication followed by filtration to yield nanoscale CTP (NCTP) with excellent dispersibility in physiological solution while maintaining its chemical structure and the porosity of the material. An anti-cancer drug, doxorubicin (DOX), is loaded onto the NCTP through simple physisorption by hydrophobic and π–π interactions, and its release can be controlled at acidic and neutral pH. The NCTP did not show practical toxicity to cancer and normal cells, but the NCTP-DOX complex showed high efficacy at killing both types of cells in-vitro. The prolonged drug release (over 50h) from the NCTP-DOX at neutral and acidic pH values was demonstrated. The in-vitro cell imaging results indicate that NCTP has good potential for bio-imaging. The cellular senescence and potency of NCTP was confirmed by the expression of senescence associated marker proteins p53 and p21. These results suggest that NCTP can be used as a new platform for imaging and drug delivery, which may find potential applications in diagnosis and therapy.
The document presents a non-isothermal multi-cell model for pressure swing adsorption (PSA) processes. The model accounts for non-isothermal effects and heat transfer between the adsorbed and bulk phases. It is validated using reported simulation and experimental data for hydrogen purification from a five-component mixture using a six-bed PSA process. The model dynamically simulates the PSA process steps while incorporating non-isothermal effects and can be adapted to different adsorption/desorption kinetics and thermodynamics.
Diffusion-weighted and Perfusion MR Imaging for Brain Tumor Characterization ...Arif S
This document provides an overview of diffusion-weighted and perfusion MR imaging techniques for characterizing brain tumors and assessing treatment response. It discusses how perfusion MR imaging can provide physiological information on tumor vascularity and differentiate tumor grades. Diffusion-weighted imaging provides data on water diffusion properties within tumors and surrounding tissue. Together these techniques can help delineate tumor margins, guide biopsy planning, and monitor response to therapies like radiation and anti-angiogenic drugs by detecting changes in vascularity and cellularity. The document reviews the strengths and limitations of these methods compared to histopathology.
This document provides an overview of conservation of biodiversity and efforts to preserve species and habitats. It discusses the arguments for conservation, including ethical, aesthetic, commercial, and life support reasons. It compares the species-based and ecosystem-based approaches to conservation and outlines some of the strengths and weaknesses of each. It also describes some of the major governmental and non-governmental organizations involved in conservation efforts, such as the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and Greenpeace, and their roles and activities.
Biodiversity Action Conference Slides for Distribution.pptxtroche3
The document discusses a conference on biodiversity action hosted by Community Foundation Ireland. It provides an agenda for the conference which includes presentations on exemplary community biodiversity action plans, the citizen's assembly on biodiversity loss, the evolving Tidy Towns competition, and a workshop on successes and challenges. It also announces that the foundation's biodiversity fund is open for applications to develop community biodiversity action plans or implement recommendations from existing plans.
03 - NAAONB Conference 2012 - Making Space for Nature by Sir John LawtonNAAONB landscapesforlife
Sir John Lawton sets the scene by linking to AONB Management, the key points from the Report for establishing a strong and connected natural environment.
This document is a thesis submitted by Louise Kjær-Hansen to the University of Copenhagen examining the impacts of human use on species. The thesis contains two parts: the first reviews literature on trait-selective harvesting and finds changes in traits in 68% of species reviewed, with horn size decreasing 10.7% on average in harvested ungulates. The second examines population trends using the Living Planet Index, finding declines of 25% globally, 90% in the Afrotropics, and 35% in protected areas for utilized species. The impacts demonstrated illustrate an undesirable future for biodiversity unless conservation strategies are improved by closer collaboration between policy and science to achieve sustainability goals.
November 2022 NSW Roadside Environment Committee NewsletterNeil Dufty
Newsletter of the New South Wales Roadside Environment Committee highlighting good practices in the environmental management of roadsides and other linear reserves in NSW, Australia. In this edition, news on:
• Quantifying and mitigating the ecological impacts of linear infrastructure and transport
• IFM Investors grant supports Friends of Lane Cove National Park Bushland Restoration Work
• Roadside weed awareness signs
• Rare native plant discovered on Hay travelling stock reserve
• Good news: highway underpasses for wildlife actually work
• Importance of linear reserves to birds and insects in semi-arid Australia
• Machine learning approaches are proactively mitigating the risk of bushfires caused by powerlines
• More equals more in Small Purple-Pea project
• Cumberland Plain Conservation Plan released
The summary provides an overview of the Cree's Foundation research program at the Manu Learning Center (MLC) in Peru. It discusses the goals of studying biodiversity in Peru and the Amazon to understand threats and gaps, the unique location and research projects at MLC, how the data contributes to conservation, and how volunteer help is important for Cree's work.
The Monarch Butterfly Fund (MBF) is seeking proposals for projects that support conservation of monarch butterflies and their habitat. Most funding will support projects protecting the oyamel fir forests where monarchs overwinter in Mexico. Projects must address one of five strategic initiatives: forest conservation, habitat assessment, scientific research, public awareness, or sustainable development. Proposals should request up to $2,500 and include a project description, timeline, and budget. The application deadline is January 5 or July 5.
This document discusses the Catchment Based Approach (CaBA) framework in the UK. The key points are:
- CaBA is a partnership approach involving government agencies, water companies, landowners, and non-governmental organizations to manage entire river catchments.
- Its goals are to improve water quality, reduce flooding, enhance biodiversity and ecosystems, and ensure sustainable water resources in line with the EU Water Framework Directive.
- Catchment partnerships coordinate local actions and produce catchment management plans to guide restoration, pollution reduction, and other projects across sectors.
- The document advocates for CaBA as an effective way to meet environmental targets through collaborative, landscape-scale management that engages all interested stakeholders
1. The document summarizes key discussions from the World Parks Congress regarding protected areas and nature conservation. It identifies greater emphasis on marine protected areas, management effectiveness, stakeholder recognition, and inclusiveness.
2. The document then provides recommendations for Scotland, including developing an integrated long-term strategy for nature, ensuring protected areas are ecologically connected, reviewing protected area coverage, improving management effectiveness, and engaging all sectors of society.
3. Key recommendations include undertaking a management effectiveness assessment of protected areas, developing new ecological indicators, improving stewardship outside protected areas, recognizing non-government conservation efforts, and ensuring youth engagement.
Presentation of Juan Jaén, membero of the Regional Committee of CSU ROLAC, on the Priority Area of Biodiversity for the #ICSUFocalPointsinLAC workshop in Universidad de Panamá March 9-10, 2015
End of project presentation given at Castleton, Peak District National Park, 2nd June 2010, describing outputs from the RELU funded Sustainable Uplands project
The Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office had a productive year in 2014, facing challenges with office realignment and budget issues while achieving conservation successes. Key accomplishments included finalizing listings and proposed critical habitat for three Sierra amphibians, developing recovery plans for endangered species in the Santa Rosa Plain, and engaging in outreach efforts with over 50 news articles and presentations to hundreds of students. The office also completed species surveys, investigations into contaminants impacts, and consultations to protect habitat, with nearly 2,800 acres conserved.
This document discusses arguments for preserving biodiversity. It notes that biodiversity provides direct values like food sources and natural products, as well as many indirect values. These indirect values include ecosystem productivity, scientific/educational value, biological control, genetic resources, environmental monitoring, recreation, human health, human rights, intrinsic value, and facilitating future conservation efforts. The document also discusses international conventions and protected area design. It evaluates approaches to conservation at the species, area, and ecosystem levels and considers debates around reserve size and design.
Confluence is the bi-annual newsletter of the Westcountry Rivers Trust. Confluence is packed with all of the latest news on the work of the Trust and what is happening in river restoration and conservation across the Westcountry.
The Autumn 2012 edition was a special edition about the Trust's River Improvement Projects funded by the Environment Agency's Catchment Restoration Fund earlier in the year.
Lec 8.pptx National Parks of Pakistan, Laws in a National Park,MUHAMMADZUBAIR422986
developments for the protection of biological diversity
The role of economics
a decade for biodiversity
action needed this decade
strategic goals
the convention on biological diversity
strategic plan for biodiversity
The document discusses biodiversity and its conservation in Ethiopia. It defines biodiversity as the variability among living organisms, including diversity within and between species and ecosystems. It notes that while over 2 million species have been documented, total species numbers are estimated at 11 million. The document emphasizes that biodiversity underpins ecosystem services critical for human well-being and outlines Ethiopia's legal obligations and the Ethiopian Institute of Biodiversity's role in conservation, sustainable use of resources, and benefit sharing.
Similar to micro reserves and priority species report 2014 (20)
1. Green Phoenix ‘Priority Species’ and
‘Micro Reserves’ Project Report
Zone 1 - Bronant 5km radius, Ceredigion - 2012-2014
Scott Roe
2.
3. Contents
Introduction 2
Objectives and aims 4-5
Habitat types categorisation list 7
Initial species list for research 8
Final ‘Target species’ list 9
Species data totals and brief analysis 10
Full species recorded list 11-17
Distribution maps 19
Bibliography, research sources and references 28
Glossary 29
4. Introduction
Welcome to the Priority species and Micro Reserves Project report. The origins of this project stemmed
from wildlife survey work and habitat management carried out at ‘Coed Phoenix Nature reserve’ over
the course of several years. ‘Coed Phoenix’ was previously part of the wider ‘Mynydd Brith’ Sitka
Spruce plantation and its conversion to a nature reserve and recording of species on site raised many
questions about it’s place in the wider landscape. The site is located Near to the village of Bronant in
Ceredigion which is approximately twelve miles South of Aberystwyth.
Some excellent results had been achieved at ‘Coed Phoenix’ with the help of many thousands of
volunteer hours and funding from Environment Wales, The Co-operative community fund,
Ceredigion council, The Environment Agency and Tidy Towns to name a few. The beginnings of a site
field guide had been created and several hundred species had now been recorded including almost
fifty species of birds, Water Voles, Otters and more than a dozen species of Dragonflies and
Damselflies, all from a site that had previously been extremely poor in diversity and was heading for
further decline as the newly planted Sitka Spruce were heading towards domination of the site once
again.
The plan had always been to find a very poor site in terms of diversity and to carry out simple
management operations such as creating open spaces, pools, adding bird and bat boxes, liberating
native broad leaf trees and removing a large percentage of the non native Sitka Spruce. We hadn’t
expected wildlife to take advantage of the small opportunities that we had provided quite so quickly
and encouraged by this we wondered just how the Coed Phoenix site fitted in with the wider
landscape and as report after report was published describing the desperate position of much of
Britain’s wildlife we felt that we should somehow be connecting the site with other fragmented
habitats in the wider area.
But what were the most appropriate habitats to think of? What species should we focus on and how
to achieve some level of connectivity without large budgets and in a short time scale?
The many questions raised resulted in us trawling through thousands of biological records dating
back as far as the 1960’s. We were very lucky to have the help and support of the local records office,
‘West Wales Biodiversity Information Centre’ who, since we first took over the site have provided us
with fantastic data, mapping and on occasion a bunch of species experts to help with our ever growing
species lists. A handful of volunteers got involved with the crunching of basic data and the quest to
narrow down our search as to exactly which species and habitats within a 5km radius of our existing
site to focus on.
Extra information, data and in some cases advice, came from many organisations such as The
National Biodiversity Network, The RSPB, Butterfly Conservation, West Wales Biodiversity
Information Centre , The Mammal Society and The British Dragonfly Society.
Analysis was made of all of the research and data gathered was then compared with species specific
information such as habitat requirements, viable population sizes, mobility and other factors that
would help us to decide which species to select for our study and wider project aims.
2
5. Having narrowed things down to approximately one hundred species that were special in some way
the idea of working with other landowners and focussing on certain habitat types and conditions
came about. It was quite clear immediately that many of the species on the list were not appropriate
for selection as they needed large scale intervention or complex changes to be made in order for
them to be targeted in any meaningful way.
A simple system was used which looked at habitat types (fig 1) and we used this combined with a
specific micro habitat features list which included things such as Hedges, coppice, standing water,
flowing water, glades, scrub mosaics, corridor routes and so on. We then looked at all of the
remaining species on our shrinking list and analysed which of these key species could benefit from
small changes to habitat or the implementation of small to medium habitat management procedures.
We often included species where we could only realistically provide them with a corridor route
rather than its full habitat requirements or were we could realistically only hope to provide shelter
and food for a species. In the end we settled upon a ‘Target list’ (see fig3) of 49 species almost all of
which were BAP/S42 or priority species that were already recorded somewhere in the 5km Radius.
All species on the list were in need of extra habitat, or improved habitat connectivity.
We were pleased with the response from landowners and settled on working with fourteen sites
within the study area which were divided up in some cases in to manageable zones so as to be
regarded as ‘micro reserves’. The sub division of sites was carried out specifically when the site in
question was too large to be considered a ‘micro reserve’ and/or it contained many micro habitats
that were individually interesting to our project and its aims.
At the heart of the ‘micro reserves’ project was the need to build up a much better picture of species
for our study and in particular to find out much more about our ‘target list’ species.
In the end more than seven hundred field hours were undertaken with a further three thousand
hours of desk research carried out. Its always the case that there’s never enough field hours and if
funding was available we would easily have justified a further year’s worth of surveys to gain a
fuller picture of things. Approximately 10% of the project hours were funded so that left us a huge
gap to fill in terms of volunteering!
In the end I think we achieved as much as was humanly possible given that when the project went
out to tender every other organisation came back with a figure at least five times higher than what
we were offering to deliver the project for.
Many thanks to all of the volunteers, organisations and landowners that have contributed in some
way, it has been a privilege to have the opportunity to manage such a project.
Scott Roe
Vital ecology
N.B. This report and related documents are only partially edited due to time constraints
I apologise for any mistakes and inaccuracies that may be found
3
6. What were the objectives of the project?
1) To learn more about the distribution and breeding situation of priority species within the area.
2) To advise on the creation a series of important 'micro reserves' within the study area that
increase the interconnectivity for key species.
3) To empower individuals to be part of the wider landscape and to enjoy the success that can
come from simple ideas that are easily implemented.
4) To have knowledge of priority species that will guide us as to what next steps should be taken to
better protect the species
These key points were intended to result in the following outcomes:
a) Increased habitat opportunities for priority species
b) A better survival rate for key species
c) Increased diversity within the 5km area
d) Increased abundance of key species within the study area
e) To have small physical improvements to land that will have lasting benefits to key species
f) To provide breeding sites for rare, threatened and priority species
g) To provide greater connectivity of sites within a 5km area
h) To improve the general habitat needs of a number of priority species
i) To empower people to think differently about the land around them and to influence their
actions in a positive way towards wildlife in general.
4
7. Were the aims and objectives of this project met?
Key objective 1 was very successful, several volunteers carried out basic desk research on more
than 70 species which all appear on various lists such as rare plant registers, species of concern and
the like. This information was gathered and combined with further research from various wildlife
organisations.
Key objective 2 was successful in as far as we can tell at this stage. Forty Four ‘Micro Reserves’ were
registered with us which were made up of Fourteen separate sites across the 5km radius of our
study area. Some of the sites were divided into sub sites as they were too large or too varied in
nature to represent a single ‘micro reserve’ In total the amount of land signed up to the scheme was
119 Hectares (294 acres). The type of land that formed part of the scheme varied and included the
following types: Garden, Bog, Forest, Woodland, Small Holding and existing Nature Reserve
The issue of connectivity between habitats and sites is of course all important if species are to
survive and prosper and we have yet to see how many of the landowners who signed up will
manage their spaces in a way that is beneficial for the future of wildlife. All landowners who signed
up to the scheme are of course very interested in wildlife and land issues but much depends on
available time, resources and if changes to management fit in with land use.
We have already seen landowners implementing recommended management changes within the
time of the project which will make a very positive impact on a number of species on our target lists
and this is very encouraging and some of the land management techniques don’t require funds to
carry out and can often save time and energy so we are hopeful that many of the sites will continue
and also improve their positive management of the spaces that they look after
It should be noted that this scheme was never intended to provide a prescription to landowners for
what they should do with their spaces and many of the individual reports to micro reserve owners
are very ‘light touch’ as far as recommendations for management are concerned. Some land owners
have expressed that they wanted specific recommendations and in these cases we have done this.
Key objective 3. We have been encouraged by the high level of interest in wildlife and land
management and have witnessed a desire to act and do something positive to help with the future
success of our native wildlife. There is however a case for saying that we have been preaching to the
already converted which is somewhat true but we hope that our work with landowners will result
in more positive action and action that is well suited to the land in question if biodiversity within
these spaces is to be preserved and improved for future generations.
Although we see the need to work on a landscape scale we are also hugely encouraged to see that
small changes on small sites can make a difference to the survival of key species and that every land
owner can play their part in this. Although there are huge differences in ‘landowner philosophy’ we
really don’t need to agree on very much in order to work together and make things so much better
for the wildlife that almost all of us care so deeply about.
5
8. (Key objective 3 continued)
I would say that all the of the individuals involved were already part of the ‘wider landscape’
before they took part in the scheme. That phrase was perhaps one that is easily typed in a
funding application but less easily won on the ground. No deception was planned in terms of
raising funds for this project but I can safely say that we really didn’t win any new ground in
terms of recruiting people who didn’t feel a connection in some way to the spaces around them.
As for changing people perception of how we as humans fit in to the spaces around us and how
we could better interact with them to help other species then we may just have ticked a box or
two.
On the issue of easily implemented ideas and people seeing the rewards, I am optimistic that we
may achieve this. As long as a good percentage of land owners do carry out some of the things
that we have discussed together then we will see many really positive actions taking place over
the next year or so that will have a fantastically good impact on the many of the species listed in
this document.
Key Objective 4. We have certainly discovered a great deal about many of the target species as
set out in the project and also really got a good grasp on where they are seen and why.
We have identified many habitat features and habitat mosaic types that support many of our
target species. Increasing some of these basic habitat types and preserving existing ones could
help to increase the abundance and diversity of wildlife within the 5km area. We recognise that
landscape scale habitat management is needed in many cases and that is well beyond the scope
of this study, but we did choose many of the species on the target list for the reason that they are
species that can benefit from smaller actions and in smaller land compartments.
Will the outcomes be reached?
It’s certainly very early days in terms of achieving all of the outcomes as set out in our original
project documents but we are hopeful about the future . So far 12% of Micro Reserve sites have
already made changes or additions to their land that have increased habitat opportunities for
wildlife found on our target list. This is an excellent start and we hope to see at least 70% of sites
achieve at least some positive changes or additions within the next year.
We know that more than one quarter of micro reserve sites are now planning specific works that
will significantly improve the ability of their site to support a greater abundance and diversity of
wildlife within under two years. Inter-connectivity of sites within the area is a difficult objective
as more than half of the micro reserve sites are under 10 acres in size. We have however been
lucky in that a few of the micro reserves sign ups are fifty acres and larger giving good
opportunities for these spaces to connect in a more meaningful way.
The scheme has so far positively effected the recognition of many species that are on our target
lists. Some of these species are commonly seen in the area and often regarded as being generally
common when often they may be ‘local’ species or even rare species that are only found in very
specific habitats. Our working with micro reserve landowners has helped us to demonstrate by
simple survey methods just how many unseen species are often inhabiting a given space. We
hope that this realisation will help with how spaces are seen and how land management
decisions are made in the future.
6
9. Habitat types categorisation (Fig 1)
Twenty two habitat types were investigated and researched. This investigation involved looking at
mapping of habitat types and comparing species records and existing species knowledge with the
absence or presence of the habitat type within our 5km radius study area. Records dating back as far
as the 1960’s were used to discover more about the species on our study list over time and how this
would relate to changing habitats, land use and other factors.
The habitat types are as follows
A.1.1.1 Semi-natural broadleaved woodland
A.2.1 dense scrub
B.1.1 unimproved acid grassland
B1.2. Semi-improved acid grassland
B2.2. Semi improved neutral grassland
B.5. marshy grassland
C.3.1. tall ruderal herb
D1.1. dry acid heath
D.2.2 wet heath
D.5. dry heath acid/grassland mosaic
D.6. wet heath/acid grassland mosaic
E.1.6.1 blanket bog
E1.17. wet modified bog
E.2.1. acid/neutral flush
E.3.3 Fen
E.3.1. valley mire
E.3.1.1 modified valley mire
E.3.2. basin mire
E.4. bare peat
F.1. swamp
G.2.2 running water
1.2.1 quarry
7
10. Initial full list of species for desk research study (fig 2)
1) Small heath
2) Small pearl-bordered fritillary
3) Varnished hook-moss
4) Brown Hare
5) Broom moth
6) Corn marigold
7) Black head gull
8) Sky lark
9) Lapwing
10) Stag's horn clubmoss
11) Hen harrier
12) Floating water-plaintain
13) Water vole
14) Curlew
15) Kestral
16) Greater Scaup
17) Thermira germanica
18) Palmate newt
19) Common Pipistrelle
20) Lesser butterfly orchid
21) Badger
22) Pied flycatcher
23) Tree pippet
24) Globflower
25) Wood bitter-vetch
26) Spotted flycatcher
27) Polecat
28) Wood warbler
29) Common Bullfinch
30) Song Thrush
31) Yellow hammer
32) Marsh tit
33) Willow tit
34) Marsh Fratillary
35) Brown long-eared bat
36) Cuckoo
37) Common frog
38) Common lizard
39) Brown hairstreak
40) Small square-spot
41) Small Phoenix
42) White ermine
43) Golden bog-moss
44) Wall
45) Common Scoter
46) Donacia crassipes
47) Teal
48) Wigeon
49) Snipe
50) Awlwort
51) Cormorant
52) River Thyme-moss
53) Stock Pigeon
54) Mistle Thrush
55) Aspicilla intermutans
56) Grey lag goose
57) Arctic turn
58) Common Pochard
59) Water rail
60) Equisetum fluviatile x palustre = E. x dycei
61) Hairy birds-foot trefoil
62) Lesser water-plaintain
63) Barn swallow
64) House martin
65) Meadow pippit
66) Greater butterfly-orchid
67) Sphagnum subsecundum
68) Fine bog moss
69) Flexuous Bog-moss
70) Grey wagtail
71) Willow warbler
72) Slender cow-horn Bogg moss
73) Green Winged orchid
74) Petty Win
75) Narrow leaved vetch
76) Corn Spurrey
77) Hieracium reculum
78) Willow warbler
79) Midland hawthorn
80) Short eared owl
81) Scare blue-tailed damselfly
82) Scapania paludicola
83) Lesser finge moss
84) Rexuous Bog-moss
85) Bog earwort
86) Tufted apple-moss
87) Megellanic -moss
8
11. 1) Large Red Damselfly
2) Blue-tailed Damselfly
3) Common Blue Damselfly
4) Azure Damselfly
5) Emerald Damselfly
6) Gold-ringed Dragonfly
7) Southern Hawker
8) Common Hawler
9) Four-spotted Chaser
10) Broad-bodied Chaser
11) Common Darter
12) Black Darter
13) Keeled Skimmer
14) Dusky Brocade
15) Double Dart
16) Small Square-spot
17) White Ermine
18) Broom Moth
19) Spinach
20) Small Phoenix
21) Small Heath
22) Common Lizard
23) Common Frog
24) Common Toad
25) Palmate Newt
26) Water Vole
27) Hedgehog
28) Soprano Pipistrelle
29) Brown Long-eared bat
30) Natterer’s bat
31) Polecat
32) Kestrel
33) Cuckoo
34) European Nightjar
35) Meadow Pipit
36) Dunnock
37) Mistle Thrush
38) Song Thrush
39) Grasshopper Warbler
40) Willow Tit
41) Lesser Redpoll
42) Bullfinch
43) Curlew
44) Snipe
45) Tree Pipit
46) Wood Warbler
47) Spotted Flycatcher
47) Pied Flycatcher
48) Marsh Tit
49) Yellow Hammer
Final ‘target list’ of 49 species made up of BAP /S42 and other priority wildlife (fig 3)
9
12. Species record overview (New records created during this project)
Total number of species recorded: 572
Total number of priority species recorded: 29
Total number of target species recorded: 37 (of 49 listed)
Flowering plant species total: 192
Number of priority species: 1
Total number of target species recorded: N/A
Lower plant species total: 64 species
Number of priority species: 0
Number of target species recorded: N/A
Tree species total: 20 species
Number of priority species: 0
Number of target species recorded: N/A
Invertebrate species total: 213
Number of priority species: 11
Number of target species recorded: 19
Other Arthropods and molluscs species total: 18
Number of priority species: 0
Number of target species recorded: N/A
Mammal species total: 15
Number of priority species: 7
Number of target species recorded: 6
Bird species total: 46
Number of priority species: 7
Number of target species recorded: 8
Amphibian species total: 3
Number of priority species: 1
Number of target species recorded: 3
Reptile species total: 2
Number of priority species: 2
Number of target species recorded: 1
10
13. Full species list for micro reserves project
(All species recorded during our site surveys)
Vascular plants (169 species)
Flowering plants
Angelica species
Archangel species
Autumnal Hawkbit Leontodon autumnalis
Aquilegia species
Barren strawberry Potentilla sterilis
Bilberry Vaccinium myrtillus
Bistort species
Bog asphodel Narthecium ossifragum
Bogbean Menyanthes trifoliata
Bog Orchid Hammarbya paludosa (S42)
Bog pondweed Potamogeton polygonifolius
Bog Stitchwort Stellaria alsine
Bramble (Blackberry) species Rubus species
Branched Bur-reed Sparganium erectum
Broad-leaved Dock Rumex obtusifolius
Broad-leaved Pondweed Potamogeton natans
Bush vetch Vicia sepium
Cat’s Ear Hypochaeris radicata
Chickweed Stellaria media
Cleavers Galium aparine
Common Bird’s-foot-trefoil Lotus corniculatus
Common Chickweed Stellaria media
Common Daisy Bellis Perenis
Common Duckweed Lemna minor
Common Eyebright Euphrasia nemorosa
Common Field-speedwell Veronica persica
Common Hemp Nettle Galeopsis tetrahit
Common Nettle Urtica dioica
Common Sorrel Rumex acetosa
Common Vetch Vicia sativa
Common Water-starwort Callitriche stagnalis
Cotoneaster species
Cranberry Vaccinium oxycoccos
Creeping Buttercup Ranunculus repens
Creeping Forget-me-not Myosotis secunda
Creeping Jenny Lysimachia nummularia
Crossed leaved heath Erica tetralix
Curled Dock Rumex crispus
Cuckoo Flower Cardamine pratensis
Cut-leaved Crane’s-bill Geranium dissectum
Daisy bellis perennis
Dandelion species Taraxacum
Devil’s Bit Scabious Succisa pratensis
Digitalis purpurea
Dog Rose Rosa canina
Enchanter's nightshade Circaea lutetiana
English Stonecrop Sedum anglicum
Equisetum species #2 (a horsetail)
Field forget me not Myosotis arvensis
Foxglove Digitalis purpurea
Fox and cubs Pilosella aurantiaca
Fuschia species
Fumitory species Fumeria species
Garden Lady's-mantle Alchemilla mollis
Germander speedwell Veronica chamaedrys
Gorse species Ulex species
Guelder rose Viburnum opulus
Greater Bird’s-foot trefoil Lotus pedunculatus
Great Willowherb Epilobium hirsutum
Greater Plantain Plantago major
Groundsel Senecio vulgaris
Ground elder Aegopodium podagraria
Hawthorn Crataegus monogyna
Hairy bittercress Cardamine hirsuta
Intermediate Water-starwort Callitriche hamulata
Heath Bedstraw Galium saxatile
Heath Speedwell Veronica officinalis
Heath spotted orchid Dactylorhiza maculata
Heather (Ling) Calluna vulgaris
Herb-robert Geranium robertianum
Hogweed Heracleum sphondylium
Holly Ilex aquifolium
Hop trefoil Trifolium campestre
Iris species
Ivy Hedera helix
Knapweed Centaurea
Lesser Spearwort Ranunculus flammula
Lilac Syringa vulgaris
Long Stalked Cranes-bill Geranium columbinum
Large-leaved Avens Geum macrophyllum
Lesser spearwort Ranunculus flammula
Marsh Cinquefoil Potentilla palustris
Marsh cudweed Gnaphalium uliginosum
Marsh marigold Caltha palustris
Marsh pennywort Hydrocotyle vulgaris
Marsh sow thistle Sonchus palustris
Marsh Thistle Cirsium palustre
Marsh Willowherb Epilobium palustre
Meadowsweet Filipendula ulmaria
Meadow thistle Cirsium dissectum
Meadow Buttercup Ranunculus acris
Meadow vetchling Lathyrus pratensis
Montbretia species
Mountain fern Dryopteris oreades Fomin
Nasturtium species
New Zealand Willow herb Epilobium brunnescens
Nutels water weed Elodea nuttallii
Opposite-leaved Golden-saxifrage
Chrysosplenium oppositifolium
Perennial Sow-thistle Sonchus arvenis
Perforate St John’s-wort Hypericum perforatum
Pineapple weed Matricaria discoidea
Potamogeton species
Primrose Primula vulgaris
Procumbent Pearlwort Sagina procumbens
Prunus species
Purple loosestrife Lythrum salicaria
Purple Toadflax Linaria purpurea
Ranunculus (batrachium)
Ribwort Plantain Plantago lanceolata
Round-leaved Crowfoot Ranunculus omiophyllus
Rosebay Willowherb Chamerion angustifoium
Ragwort species Senecio
14. Vascular plants (continued)
Raspberry species
Red Campion Silene dioica
Red Clover Trifolium pratense
RedshankTringa totanus
Selfheal Prunella vulgaris
Sheep’s Sorrel Rumex acetosella
Silverweed Potentilla anserina
Skullcap Scutellaria galericulata
Sneezewort Achillea ptarmica
Spear Thistle Cirsium vulgare
Spindle Euonymus europaeus
Square stalked willow herb Epilobium tetragonum
Starwort species
Stitchwort species Stellaria species
Stonewort species
Tormentil Potentilla erecta
Tufted vetch Vicia cracca
Viburnum species
Violet species
Water-cress species Rorippa nasturtium-aquaticum
Water Crow-foot species
Water Forget-me-not Myosotis scorpioides
Water Horsetail Equisetum fluviatile
Water-purslane Lythrum portula
White Clover Trifolium repens
Wild carrot Daucus carota
Wood Avens Geum urbanum
Yarrow Achillea millefolium
Yellow flag Iris pseudacorus
Yellow Rattle Rhinanthus minor
Yellow Water Lily Nuphar lutea
Grasses, Sedges, Rushes,
ferns and mosses (38 species)
Grasses (24 species)
Annual Meadow-grass poa annua
Bent grass Agrostis
Bread Wheat Triticum aestivum
Cock’s-foot Dactylis glomerata
Common Cottongrass Eriophorum angustifolium
Common Couch Elymus repens
Creeping Bent Agrostis stolonifera
Creeping soft grass Holcus mollis
Crested Dog’s tail Cynosurus cristatus
False oat grass Arrhenatherum elatius
Greater Plantain Plantago major
Hare's Tail Cotton Grass Eriophorum vaginatum
Knot-grass Illecebrum verticillatum
Marsh Foxtail Alopecurus geniculatus
Purple Moor grass Molinia caerulea
Pampas grass Cortaderia selloana
Red Fescue Festuca rubra
Rye-grass species Lolium species
Soft brome Bromus hordeaceus
Small Sweet-grass Glyceria declinata
Grasses (Continued)
Sweet Vernal grass Anthoxanthum odoratum
Timothy Phleum pratense
Tufted Hair-grass Deschampsia cespitosa
Yorkshire fog Holcus lanatus
Tufted Hair-grass Deschampsia cespitosa
Rushes (12 species)
Bulbous rush Juncus bulbosus
Bulrush Typha latifolia
Common Spike-rush Eleocharis palustris
Compact Rush Juncus conglomeratus
Cyperus longusspecies
Hare's Tail Cotton Sedge Eriophorum vaginatum
Heath Rush Juncus squarrosus
Heath Wood-rush Luzula multiflora
Flowering Rush Butomus umbellatus
Jointed rush Juncus articulatus
Soft Rush Juncus effusus
Toad rush Juncus bufonius
Ferns (9 species)
Broad Bucker-fern Dryopteris dilatata
Bracken Pteridium aquilinum
Hard fern Blechnum spicant
Hay-scented buckler fern Dryopteris aemula
Lady fern Athyrium filix-femina
Polypody Polypodium vulgare
Hart's tongue fern Phyllitis scolopendrium
Narrow Buckler Fern Dryopteris Carthusiana
Scaly Male-fern Dryopteris affinis
Sedges (3 species)
Star sedge Carex echinata
Common Sedge Carex nigra
Pendulous sedge Carex pendula
Trees (20 species)
Downy Birch
Hawthorn Crataegus monogyna
Willows >4 species
Ash
Beech
Sessile Oak
Pendunculate Oak
Silver Birch
Downy Birch
Scot’s Pine
Sitka Spruce
Norway Spruce
Hazel
Alder
Elder
Rowan
Eucalyptus
15. Invertebrates (213 species)
Damselflies and Dragonflies (12 Species)
Damselfies (5 species)
Azure Damsefly Coenagrion puella (*)
Blue-tailed damselfly Ischnura elegans (*)
Common Blue damselfly Enallagma cyathigerum *
Emerald damselfly Lestes sponsa (*)
Large Red Damselfly Pyrrhosoma nymphula (*)
Dragonflies (7 species)
Black Darter Sympetrum danae (*)
Broad-bodied Chaser Libellula depressa (*)
Common Darter Sympetrum striolatum (*)
Common Hawker Aeshna juncea (*)
Four-spotted chaser Libellula quadrimaculata (*)
Golden ringed dragonfly Cordulegaster boltonii *
Southern hawker Aeshna cyanea, (*)
Butterflies (16 Species)
Gatekeeper Pyronia tithonus
Green-veined white Pieris napi
Large White Pieris brassicae
Large Skipper Ochlodes sylvanus
Meadow Brown Maniola jurtina
Orange tip Anthocharis cardamines
Red admiral Vanessa atalanta
Ringlet Aphantopus hyperantus
Small Copper Lycaena phlaeas
Small Heath Coenonympha pamphilus (BAP/S42/*)
Small Pearl-bordered fritillary Boloria selene (BAP/S42)
Small Skipper Aphantopus hyperantus
Small Tortoiseshell Aglais urticae
Small White Pieris rapae
Speckled Wood Pararge aegeria
Wall Lasiommata megera
Bees (8 species)
Anthophora species (a species of solitary bee)
Bombus species #4
Buff-tailed Bumblebee Bombus terrestris
Forest Cuckoo Bumblebee Bombus sylvestris
Garden Bumblebee Bombus Hortorum
Honey bee Apis mellifera
White-tailed Bumblebee Bombus locurum
Nomada species
Beetles (21 species)
7-spot ladybird Coccinella septempunctata
Agriotes sp (a click beetle)
Black Carrion Beetle Silpha atrata
Black Clock Pterostichus madidus
Click beetle species #2
Common Red Soldier beetle Rhagonycha fulva
Garden chafer Phyllopertha horticola
Green Dock Beetle Gastrophysa virdula
Great Diving Beetle Dytiscus marginalis
Green Tiger beetle Cicindela campestris
Luperus longicornis
Rove beetles species #1
Rove beetle species #2,
Beetles (continued)
Soldier beetle sp #2
Soldier beetle sp #3
Neocrepidodera species (a flea beetle)
Nicrophorus Vespilloides
Violet ground beetle Carabus violaceus
Water beetles
Acilius sulcatus
Whirligig beetle
Dytiscus species #2
Bugs (15 species)
Cicadella viridis
Common flower bug Anthocoris nemorum
Common Frog hopper Philaenus spumarius
Groundhopper species
Gerris lacustris (a pondskater)
Meadow plant bug Leptopterna dolabrata
Mirid bug species #2
Mirid bug species #3
Mirid bug species #4
Orthotylus species (A mirid bug)
Sloe Shieldbug Dolycoris baccarum
Shield bug species #2
Water bugs
Greater waterboatman species Notonecta species
Lesser waterboatman species
Pondskater species Gerris species
True Flies (20 species)
Alderfly species
Caddisfly larvae species
Deerfly species (Chrysops species)
Empid Fly species
Eristalis tenax (a species of Hoverfly)
Glyphotaelius pellucidus (A sedge fly)
Helophilus pendulus ( a species of hoverfly)
Leuctra species (A Needle fly)
Notch Horned cleg Haematopota pluvialis
Phantom midge species
Rhagio species (A snipe fly)
Scorpion fly species
Stilt legged fly species
Tipula oleracea/paludosa (A Crane fly)
Tiplula species 2, 3, 4 and 5
Tabanus sp (A Horse fly)
Yellow-dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria
Sawflies
Greater Horntail Urocerus gigas
Sawfly species #1
Sawfly species #2
Other Invertebrates (9 species)
Common Wasp Vespula vulgaris
Black Ant Lasius niger
Red Ant Myrmica rubra
Common Green Grasshopper Omocestus viridulus
Ichneuman species
Chrysis sp
Ruby tailed wasp species #1
Ruby tailed wasp species #2
Rhyssa persuasoria (a Sabre Wasp)
17. Spiders (7 species)
Raft Spider Dolomedes fimbriatus
Tetragnatha species (a Long-jawed spider)
Drassodes species
Garden cross spider Araneus diadematus
Orb web spider species #1
Orb web spider species #2
Orb web spider species #3
Harvestmen
Harvestman species #1
Harvestman species #2
Harvestman species #3
Other Arthropods (10 species)
Common Shiny Woodlouse Oniscus asellus
Common Rough Woodlouse Porcellio scaber
Common Striped woodlouse Philoscia muscorum
Lithobius species (A centipede)
Common earthworm Lumbricus terrestris
Thrip species
Millipede species
Centipede species
Common earwig Forficula auricularia
Leech Hirudinea
Water slater species
Terrestrial molluscs (5 species)
Large Black Slug Arion ater
Arion species #2 (a slug)
Arion species #3 (a slug)
Common garden snail Cornu aspersum
Water snail species
Freshwater Molluscs (3 species)
Mussell species
Ramshorn snail species
Lymnaea species (a pond snail)
18. Lower plants: (64 species)
Lichens, Mosses and Fungi
A specialist survey of lower plants is beyond the
scope of this survey, however some casual
records of fungi and lichens and moss have
been included below.
Lichen (26 species)
Amendina punctata
Arthonia radiata
Cladonia species
Evernia prunastri
Flavoparmelia caperata
Fuscidea lightfootii
Hypotrachyna species #1
Hypotrachyna species #2
Hypogymnia physodes
Hypogymnia tubulosa
Lecanora chlarotera,
Lecidella elaeochroma
Opegrapha atra
Peltigera hymenina
Peltigera spp (lichenised fungi)
platismatia glauca
Parmelia sulcata
Parmotrema chinense
Parmotrema perlatum
Porpidia species #1
Porpidia species #2
Ramalina fastigata
Ramalina farinacaea
Usnea subfloridana
Xanthoria polycarpa
Xanthoria parietina
Fungi (7 species)
Yellow stagshorn Calocera viscosa
Orange slime mould
Blushing bracket Daedaleopsis confragosa
Bracket fungi species #2
Conifer Mazegill Gloeophyllum sepiarium
Yellow brain Tremmella mesenterica
Pleurotus species (an Oyster mushroom)
Mosses (26 species)
Broom Fork-moss Dicranum scoparium
Common Tamarisk-moss Thuidium tamariscinum
Dwarf Swan-neck Moss Campylopus pyriformis
Polytrichum aloides
Polytrichum commune
Polytrichum formosum
Polytrichum species #4
Rough-stalked Feather-moss Brachythecium rutabulum
Silky Forklet-moss Dicranella heteromalla
Sphagnum moss species > 5 species
Ulota bruchii/crispa
Glittering Wood-moss Hylocomium splendens
Mamillate Plait-moss Hypnum andoi
Downy Plait-moss Hypnum callichroum
Cypress-leaved plait-moss Hypnum cupressforme
Slender Mouse-tail Moss Isothecium myosuroides
Slender Mouse-tail Moss Kindbergia praelongum
Waved Silk-moss Plagiothecium undulatum
Red-stemmed Feather-moss Pleurozium schreberi
Neat Feather-moss Pseudoscleropodium purum
Little Shaggy-moss Rhytidiadelphus loreus
Springy Turf-moss Rhytidiadelphus squarrosus
Liverworts (5 species)
Bifid Crestwort Lophocolea bidentata
Forked Veilwort Metzgeria furcata
Pellia endiviifolia
White Earwort Diplophyllum albicans
Frullania dilatata
19. Birds (46 species)
Barn Owl Tyto alba
Blackbird Turdus merula
Blackcap Sylvia atricapilla
Blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus
Bullfinch Pyrrhula pyrrhula (BAP/S42/*)
Buzzard Buteo buteo
Curlew Numenius arquata (BAP/S42/*)
Canada Goose Branta canadensis
Carrion Crow Corvus corone
Chaffinch Fringilla coelebs
Chiff Chaff Phylloscopus collybita
Collared Dove Streptopelia decaocto
Coal Tit Periparus ater
Cuckoo Cuculus canorus (BAP/S42/*)
Goldcrest Regulus regulus
Great Tit Parus major
Greater Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major
Gull species
Grey Heron Ardea cinerea
House Sparrow Passer domesticus
Jackdaw Corvus monedula
Jay Garrulus glandarius
Lesser Redpoll Acanthis cabaret (BAP/S42/*)
Linnet Linaria cannabina
Magpie Pica pica
Mallard Anas platyrhynchos
Mistle Thrush Turdus viscivorus (BAP/S42/*)
Nuthatch Sitta europaea
Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca (BAP/S42/*)
Pied wagtail Motacilla alba
Pheasant Phasianus colchicus
Red Kite Milvus milvus
Siskin Spinus spinus
Raven Corvus corax
Red kite Milvus milvus
Robin Erithacus rubecula
Snipe Gallinago gallinago (*)
Song Thrush Turdus philomelos (BAP/S42/*)
Starling Sturnus vulgaris
Swallow Hirundo rustica
Tawny Owl Strix aluco
Tree Creeper Certhia familiaris
Willow Warbler Phylloscopus trochilus
Woodcock Scolopax rusticola
Wood Pigeon Columba palumbus
Wren Troglodytes troglodytes
Amphibians (3 species)
Common Frog Rana temporaria (*)
Palmate newt Lissotriton helveticus (*)
Common Toad Bufo bufo (BAP/S42/*)
Reptiles (2 species)
Slow Worm Anguis fragilis (BAP/S42)
Common Lizard Lacerta vivipara (BAP/S42/*)
Mammals (15 species)
Bank Vole Myodes glareolus
Badger Meles meles
Brown Rat Rattus norvegicus
Common Pipistrelle Pipistrellus pipistrellus (S42/BAP/*)
Eastern Grey Squirrel Sciurus carolinensis
Fox Vulpes vulpes
Harvest Mouse Micromys minutus (S42/BAP)
Hedeghog Erinaceus europaeus (S42/BAP/*)
Otter Lutra lutra (S42/BAP/*)
Mole Talpa europaea Linnaeus
Polecat Mustela putorius (BAP/S42/*)
Soprano Pipistrelle Pipistrellus pygmaeus (S42/BAP/*)
Sorex species (a Shrew)
Water Vole Arvicola amphibius (BAP/S42/*)
Wood Mouse Apodemus sylvaticus
20.
21. Study area ‘priority species’ distribution maps
Species shown in red text were not on the ‘priority species’ list
but have been included as a ‘key species’
19
22. Large Red Damselfly (23 records)
Blue-tailed Damselfly (3 records)
Common Blue Damselfly (7 records)
Dragonflies and Damselflies
Azure Damselfly (12 records)
Emerald Damselfly (5 records) Golden-ringed Dragonfly (2 records)
23. Dragonflies and Damselflies (Continued)
Southern Hawker (2 records)
Common Hawker (4 records)
Four-Spotted Chaser (23 records) Broad-Bodied Chaser (4 records)
Common Darter (4 records) Black Darter (2 records)
Keeled Skimmer (0 records)
24. Moths and Butterflies
Dusky Brocade and Small square spot (1 record)
Double Dart and Spinach (0 records)
Small Elephant Hawk Moth (1 record)
White Ermine (5 records)
Small Square-spot (2 records)
Small Phoenix (3 records) records)
Small Heath ( 6 records)
Small Pearl-bordered Fritilary (1 record)
Broom Moth ( 7 records)
25. Reptiles and Amphibians
Common Lizard (1 record) Common Toad (5 records)
Common Frog (11 records) Palmate Newt (7 records)
26. Mammals
Water Vole (5 records) Hedgehog (2 records)
Soprano Pipistrelle (3 records) Brown Long-eared Bat (0 records)
Natterer’s Bat (0 records) Polecat (3 records)
Otter (2 records)
30. Bibliography, research sources and references
A field guide to monitoring nests, J. Ferguson-lees, R. Castell & D. Leech, 2011, BTO
A field guide in colour to Beetles, K.W. Harde, 1984, Octopus
Amphibian habitat management handbook, J. Baker, T. Beebee, J. Buckly, T. Gent, D. Orchard, 2010, ARC
An introduction to woodland ecology, J Cousens, 1974, Oliver & Boyd
Biodiversity in fragmented landscapes, A. Eycott & K. Watts, 2011, Forestry commission
Bat workers manual 3rd Edition, A. Mitchell-Jones, 2004, JNCC
Birds in Wales, B. O'shea, 2000, Skylark books
Caring for small woods, K. Broad,1999, Earthscan publications Ltd
Coed Phoenix nature reserve: Management guide, S. Roe, 2012.
Ceredigion local biodiversity action plan, 2002, Coast and Countryside section, Ceredigion council
Complete British insects, M Chinery, 2005, Harper Collins
Complete British wildlife, P. Sterry, 1997, Harper Collins
Collins butterfly guide, T. Tolman & R Lewington, 1997, Harper Collins
Collins tree guide, O. Johnson & D. More, 2004, Harper Collins
Countryside council for Wales - SSSI information
Dragonflies, P Miller, 1995, Richmond publishing
Ecology: Individuals, populations and communities, Begon, Harper, Townsend, 1990, Blackwell Scientific
Ecological principles and applications, J Chapman & M Reiss, 1995, Cambridge University Press
Flora of Cardiganshire, 2010, A.O. Chater
Flora of the British isles, 1962, Clapham. Tutin. Warburg, Cambridge University press
Forests and birds: A guide to managing forests for rare birds, G. Elliot, 1997, Forestry Commission
Freshwater life, M. Greenhalgh & D. Overden, 2007, Harper Collins
Field guide to bumblebees of Great Britain and Ireland, M. Edwards, M. Jenner, 2005, Ocelli
Field guide to the moths of great Britain and Ireland, P. Waring, M. Townsend, 2003, British wildlife
Field guide to the Dragonflies and Damselflies of Great Britain and Ireland, S. Brooks, R. Lewington, 1999, British wildlife publishing
Green Phoenix & Coed tan-y-bryn nature reserve: five year report, S. Roe, 2010.
Habitat management for bats: a guide for land managers, landowners and their advisors, 2001, JNCC
Habitat restoration monitoring handbook, J. Mitchley, 2000, English Nature
Habitat restoration project, R. Dryden, 1997, English Nature
Handbook for phase 1 habitat survey, 2010, JNCC
Insects of Britain and western Europe, M Chinery, 1986, Domino books
Introduction to experimental ecology, Lewis & Taylor, 1967, Academic press Inc. (London) Ltd
lichenportal.org
lichens.lastdragon.org
Lichens of Ireland project data
Mammals of the British Isles, Handbook 4th edition, S. Harris & D.W. Yalden, 2008, The Mammal Society, Blackwell scientific publications.
Management of bare ground, 2005, English nature
Managing woodland open space for wildlife, 2005, EWGS
Developing butterflies as indicators in Europe, C. Van Swaay, M. Warren, 2012, Butterfly Conservation
Managing habitats for conservation, William J. Suherland & David A. Hill, 1995, Cambridge University Press
National vegetation classification user's handbook, J. Rodwell, JNCC
National vegetation classification field guides, JNCC
Natural communities, O Bishop, 1973, John Murray London
NBN gateway: species data
Pocket guide to butterflies of great Britain and Ireland, R. Lewington, 2003, British wildlife publishing
Practical conservation: site assessment and management planning, J Tait, A Lane, S Carr,. 1988, OU
Reptile habitat management hand book, P. Edgar, J. Foster, J. Baker, 2010, ARC
The conservation of lower plants in woodland, N.G. Hodgetts, 1996, JNCC
The handbook of native trees and shrubs, 2001, C. De la Bedoyere, Woodland trust
West Wales Biodiversity Information Centre - Biological records data and mapping
Woodland management: A practical guide, C. Starr, 2005, Crowwood Press
Wildflowers of roadsides and waste places, R. Phillips, 1987, Elm Tree books
Woodland rides and glades: their management for wildlife, M.S. Warren, 1993, JNCC
Wildlife conservation in woodland, R. Steele, 1972, HMSO
Wild flowers of Britain. R. Phillips, 1977, Pan Books Ltd
Woodland management for butterflies and moths: a best practise guide, 2011, Butterfly Conconservation handbook 3rd edition, R. Strachan, T. Moorhouse, M
Gelling, 2011, The wildlife conservation research unit
31. Glossary
S42
Priority species in Wales.
BAP
Biodiversity action plan species. Species identified as being the most threatened and requiring
conservation action.
IUCN
The International Union for the Conservation of Nature
The IUNC was founded in 1948 as the world’s first global environmental organisation and is
a leading authority on the environment and sustainable development.
Indicator species
A species that can help to monitor ecological change or give clues to previous and current habitat
conditions. Indicators can tell us about air quality, soil acidity, nutrients available in the soil, pollution
levels and provide us with information about the general health of the habitat.
Riparian
Waterside
E
32. Green Phoenix 5km study area map
Zone 1 - Bronant 5km radius, Ceredigion