MEDICAL DEVICES FOR BIOSIMILARS –
BURDEN OR CHANCE?
London, 01 Oct 2015
2 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
1. Brief Introduction to αNTERIS mEDICAL
2. Biosimilars – Opportunities and Challenges
3. Combination or Borderline Products
4. Three Reasons why Developers of Biosimilars can Benefit
from Medical Devices
5. Case Studies
6. Conclusions
AGENDA
3 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
Brief Introduction to
αNTERIS
mEDICAL
1
4 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
αNTERIS mEDICAL
• Founding motive: „We can do this better“
• Service offering of non-core capabilities to Biopharma, Biotech, and Medical
Device industries
0
2
4
6
Employees
• Dual company background of life sciences
and engineering
• Broad and diverse customer base
• Growing and expanding in scope
5 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
αNTERIS mEDICAL
What is it we can do better than
the customer?
• Integration into client‘s teams
• Independent, and fully focused on medical device
regulations and requirements
• Good access to resources with relevant background
• Flexible with regard to location and timing of services
• Broad network of partners in Engineering, Clinical
Development, and Manufacturing
6 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
Biosimilars –
Opportunities and
Challenges
2
7 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
BIOLOGICS: THECASE OF
TNFINHIBITORS
„TNF inhibitors will never become commercial
products“
John Doe, M.D., 1995
Head of a leading research organization in TNF research
Publications in Nature, Science, PNAS, ….
8 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
BIOLOGICS:
THE CASE OFTNF INHIBITORS
...of course, we know what happened next:
20001998 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Worlds best-selling drug 2014
IMS Health
9 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
BIOLOGICS ARE HUGELY
SUCCESSFUL PRODUCTS
10 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
SLOW START WITH GREAT
POTENTIAL
11 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
UNPRECEDENTED WAVE
OF PATENT EXPIRIES
12 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
(ALMOSTCOMPLETE LISTOF)
SUCCESS FACTORS
Source: The Biosimilars Market Today And Tomorrow, Pharmaceutical Technology Europe, Volume 22, Issue 9 (Sep 2010)
13 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
ADDITIONSTOTHE LISTOF
SUCCESS FACTORS
1. Regulatory Competence: Track record will allow regulatory
agencies to „borrow“ from earlier products and other markets
• Point in case: Zarxio approval by US FDA
2. Ability to convince KOLs and decision makers
3. Ability to develop and clear medical devices
14 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
Combination
products
and
borderline
products
3
15 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
From 21 CFR part 4 comments and clarification:
A syringe is a device used to deliver another medical product (e.g., a drug) (see, e.g.,
21 CFR 880.5860). Accordingly, a prefilled syringe is a combination product and
subject to this rule.
21 CFR Part 4 – cGMP for Combination Products
As set forth in part 3 (21 CFR Part 3), a combination product is a product
comprised of any combination of a drug and a device; a device and a biological
product; a biological product and a drug; or a drug, a device, and a biological
product.
Rule 21 CFR Part 4 became final in January 2013 and became effective 180 days later
DRUG / DEVICE
COMBINATION PRODUCTS
16 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
WHATDOESTHIS MEAN
FOR BIOSIMILARS ?
• Biosimilars are treated like any other biologic
• Any product classified as combination product needs to fulfill both, requirements
for medicinal products (drugs) AND requirements for medical devices
• Biosimilars in the US are reviewed by CBER
• The device part of a submission may include review by CDRH
• Where unclear, the Office of Combination Products assigns to either CBER or
CDRH
17 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
21 CFR PART 4
• Most biosimilars are combination products like any other biologic
• Any product classified as combination product needs to fulfill both, requirements
for medicinal products (drugs) AND requirements for medical devices
• Biosimilars in the US are reviewed by CBER
• The device part of a submission may include review by CDRH
• Where unclear, the Office of Combination Products assigns to either CBER
or CDRH
18 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
21 CFR PART 4 –TWO
OPTIONSTO COMPLY
Product developed according to drug
CGMPs (21 CFR 211)
Product developed according to device QSR (21
CFR 820)
820.20: Management responsibility 211.84: Testing and approval or rejection of components,
drug product containers, and closures
820.30: Design controls 211.103: Calculation of yield
820.50: Purchasing controls 211.132: Tamper-evident packaging requirements for over-
the-counter (OTC) human drug products
820.100: Corrective and preventive actions 211.137: Expiration dating
820.170: Installation 211.165: Testing and release for distribution
820.200: Servicing 211.166: Stability testing
211.167: Special testing requirements
211.170: Reserve samples
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM429304.pdf
19 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
BUT…. IS FDA REALLY
ENFORCING PART4 ??
20 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
THE CASE OFTHEAMGEN
WARNING LETTER
Products found adulturated:
 Prolia prefilled syringe
 Enbrel lyo vial
 Enbrel Sureclick autoinjector
21 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
THE CASE OFTHEAMGEN
WARNING LETTER
22 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
THE CASE OFTHEAMGEN
WARNING LETTER
Conclusion for the US:
1. A prefilled syringe is not considered a medical device
2. In the U.S., a PFS is regulated as a combination product
3. A Design History File needs to be established
4. Safety and performance requirements must be met (as for a medical device)
5. Design control needs to be applied (based on ISO 13485, chapter 7.3 and 21 CFR Part 820.30)
23 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/sectors/medical-devices/files/meddev/2_1_3_rev_3-12_2009_en.pdf
BORDERLINE
PRODUCTS
24 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
BORDERLINE
PRODUCTS
Conclusion for Europe:
 A prefilled syringe is not considered a
medical device
 In Europe, a PFS is regulated as a
medicinal product
o A technical dossier needs to be
established
o Safety and performance
requirements must be met (as for a
medical device)
25 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
SO…HOW DO YOU
ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE?
Stupid answer: …you comply with medical device regulations…
A bit more useful answer:
 Choose a modular approach (generate modules of documentation
for reuse you suspect you will need in the future
 Describe the combination product as
(1) the medicinal product with it’s indication for use
(2) the medical device components and their
performance criteria
(3) the combination of the medicinal product and the
medical device components, including
demonstration of performance criteria and usability
26 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
 A well maintained DHF for a medical device contains
dozens of documents referencing each other
 Subject to audits by regulatory agencies or Notified
Bodies
 The TFTOC is more or less prescribed within 21 CFR
820 and ISO 13485
 There must be a smarter way to comply
A COMPLETE DHF ?
FOR A SYRINGE ??
27 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
1. A modular approach is the easiest way to address the
need to conform with the essential requirements for
medical devices
1. For a prefilled syringe with NSD three components of the
Technical File are required:
Module describing the PFS
Module describing the NSD
Combination module
MANAGING THE BURDEN OF
TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION
28 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
1. Biosimilars, like any combination product have to fulfill the essential
requirements for safety and performance of the device used in the
combination
2. Increasingly important: the usability of the product has to be built into
the design (usually done by performing formative usability studies) and
demonstrated/validated (usually in a summative handling study)
3. Biosimilars may not be superior to the originator, however the device
used in the combination may be under certain conditions
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
FOR THE USE OF MEDICAL
DEVICES WITH BIOSIMILARS
29 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
DO BIOSIMILARS HAVE TO
USE THE SAME DEVICES
AS THE ORIGINATOR?
Guidance for Industry on Biosimilars: Q & As Regarding Implementation of
the BPCI Act of 2009: Questions and Answers Part I
http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm259809.htm
30 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
How Biosimilar
Developers Can
Benefit from
Medical Devices
4
31 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
ACHIEVING COMPETITIVE
ADVANTAGE THROUGH
DEVICE IMPROVEMENTS
Trend from vials to prefilled syringes to autoinjectors:
1. Better usability, especially in indications with tactile and sensory impairments
2. Higher perceived and actual value
3. Better branding and brand recognition
4. IP protection around the device
5. Long changeover periods
32 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
DEVICE IMPROVEMENTS IN
THE SAME CATEGORY
Concrete example: Needle Safety Device (NSD)
Areas of improvement:
 Finger flange: ensure better grip
 Shape and size of plunger rod base: ensure
better grip
 Shape and size of window: improve
readability
 Additional safety features: NSD housing
snaps into plunger rod base
 All changes supported by human factors
studies and documentation available to
customer
33 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
DIFFERENTIATION AND
BRANDING
Example: Human Growth Hormone Market – Which ones are the biosimilar
products??
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
34 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
Case Studies
5
35 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
CASE 1:
IMPROVED NSD
Biosimilar may have an edge over competition
Case of a biosimilar developer:
• Originator markets one of the devices to the left in
combination with the biologic
• The device manufacturer now offers an improved
version of the NSD, complete with supporting
documentation (performance data, usability data)
• Originator AND biosimilar competiion face several
hurdles:
• Regulatory hurdle
• Cost of change-over
• Finding a CMO for a relatively new device
36 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
CASE 2: IMPROVED
AUTOINJECTOR
Improved device for a human growth hormone biosimilar:
Benefits from the change:
 Higher attractiveness attracts new patients
 New features improve usability (pre-set
dose)
 Helpful in tender markets where device
aspects are considered
 Marketing argument
 IP around the device
37 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
CASE 3: IMPROVED
DISPOSABLE PEN
Disease Area: Rheumathoid Arthritis (RA)
• Obvious and significant differences in usability
• Many products on the market allow for significant improvements
• Opportunity to improve, differentiate, and leverage a success factor other than price and date of entry
38 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
Conclusions
6
39 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
CONCLUSIONS
1. Regulators support improvements under certain
conditions
2. Biosimilars can (and are) improving within product
categories, gaining a competitive edge over
biosimilar and originator competitors
3. Biosimilars can improve across categories (for
example replace prefilled syringes with
autoinjectors)
4. Improvements on the device level are accepted,
effective differentiators, and provide a sustainable
competitive advantage
40 | Introduction to anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com
Any questions?
You can find me at dk@anteris-medical.com
www.anteris-medical.com
THANKYOU !

Medical devices for biosimilars

  • 1.
    MEDICAL DEVICES FORBIOSIMILARS – BURDEN OR CHANCE? London, 01 Oct 2015
  • 2.
    2 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com 1. Brief Introduction to αNTERIS mEDICAL 2. Biosimilars – Opportunities and Challenges 3. Combination or Borderline Products 4. Three Reasons why Developers of Biosimilars can Benefit from Medical Devices 5. Case Studies 6. Conclusions AGENDA
  • 3.
    3 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com Brief Introduction to αNTERIS mEDICAL 1
  • 4.
    4 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com αNTERIS mEDICAL • Founding motive: „We can do this better“ • Service offering of non-core capabilities to Biopharma, Biotech, and Medical Device industries 0 2 4 6 Employees • Dual company background of life sciences and engineering • Broad and diverse customer base • Growing and expanding in scope
  • 5.
    5 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com αNTERIS mEDICAL What is it we can do better than the customer? • Integration into client‘s teams • Independent, and fully focused on medical device regulations and requirements • Good access to resources with relevant background • Flexible with regard to location and timing of services • Broad network of partners in Engineering, Clinical Development, and Manufacturing
  • 6.
    6 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com Biosimilars – Opportunities and Challenges 2
  • 7.
    7 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com BIOLOGICS: THECASE OF TNFINHIBITORS „TNF inhibitors will never become commercial products“ John Doe, M.D., 1995 Head of a leading research organization in TNF research Publications in Nature, Science, PNAS, ….
  • 8.
    8 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com BIOLOGICS: THE CASE OFTNF INHIBITORS ...of course, we know what happened next: 20001998 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Worlds best-selling drug 2014 IMS Health
  • 9.
    9 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com BIOLOGICS ARE HUGELY SUCCESSFUL PRODUCTS
  • 10.
    10 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com SLOW START WITH GREAT POTENTIAL
  • 11.
    11 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com UNPRECEDENTED WAVE OF PATENT EXPIRIES
  • 12.
    12 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com (ALMOSTCOMPLETE LISTOF) SUCCESS FACTORS Source: The Biosimilars Market Today And Tomorrow, Pharmaceutical Technology Europe, Volume 22, Issue 9 (Sep 2010)
  • 13.
    13 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com ADDITIONSTOTHE LISTOF SUCCESS FACTORS 1. Regulatory Competence: Track record will allow regulatory agencies to „borrow“ from earlier products and other markets • Point in case: Zarxio approval by US FDA 2. Ability to convince KOLs and decision makers 3. Ability to develop and clear medical devices
  • 14.
    14 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com Combination products and borderline products 3
  • 15.
    15 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com From 21 CFR part 4 comments and clarification: A syringe is a device used to deliver another medical product (e.g., a drug) (see, e.g., 21 CFR 880.5860). Accordingly, a prefilled syringe is a combination product and subject to this rule. 21 CFR Part 4 – cGMP for Combination Products As set forth in part 3 (21 CFR Part 3), a combination product is a product comprised of any combination of a drug and a device; a device and a biological product; a biological product and a drug; or a drug, a device, and a biological product. Rule 21 CFR Part 4 became final in January 2013 and became effective 180 days later DRUG / DEVICE COMBINATION PRODUCTS
  • 16.
    16 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com WHATDOESTHIS MEAN FOR BIOSIMILARS ? • Biosimilars are treated like any other biologic • Any product classified as combination product needs to fulfill both, requirements for medicinal products (drugs) AND requirements for medical devices • Biosimilars in the US are reviewed by CBER • The device part of a submission may include review by CDRH • Where unclear, the Office of Combination Products assigns to either CBER or CDRH
  • 17.
    17 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com 21 CFR PART 4 • Most biosimilars are combination products like any other biologic • Any product classified as combination product needs to fulfill both, requirements for medicinal products (drugs) AND requirements for medical devices • Biosimilars in the US are reviewed by CBER • The device part of a submission may include review by CDRH • Where unclear, the Office of Combination Products assigns to either CBER or CDRH
  • 18.
    18 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com 21 CFR PART 4 –TWO OPTIONSTO COMPLY Product developed according to drug CGMPs (21 CFR 211) Product developed according to device QSR (21 CFR 820) 820.20: Management responsibility 211.84: Testing and approval or rejection of components, drug product containers, and closures 820.30: Design controls 211.103: Calculation of yield 820.50: Purchasing controls 211.132: Tamper-evident packaging requirements for over- the-counter (OTC) human drug products 820.100: Corrective and preventive actions 211.137: Expiration dating 820.170: Installation 211.165: Testing and release for distribution 820.200: Servicing 211.166: Stability testing 211.167: Special testing requirements 211.170: Reserve samples http://www.fda.gov/downloads/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM429304.pdf
  • 19.
    19 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com BUT…. IS FDA REALLY ENFORCING PART4 ??
  • 20.
    20 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com THE CASE OFTHEAMGEN WARNING LETTER Products found adulturated:  Prolia prefilled syringe  Enbrel lyo vial  Enbrel Sureclick autoinjector
  • 21.
    21 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com THE CASE OFTHEAMGEN WARNING LETTER
  • 22.
    22 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com THE CASE OFTHEAMGEN WARNING LETTER Conclusion for the US: 1. A prefilled syringe is not considered a medical device 2. In the U.S., a PFS is regulated as a combination product 3. A Design History File needs to be established 4. Safety and performance requirements must be met (as for a medical device) 5. Design control needs to be applied (based on ISO 13485, chapter 7.3 and 21 CFR Part 820.30)
  • 23.
    23 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/sectors/medical-devices/files/meddev/2_1_3_rev_3-12_2009_en.pdf BORDERLINE PRODUCTS
  • 24.
    24 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com BORDERLINE PRODUCTS Conclusion for Europe:  A prefilled syringe is not considered a medical device  In Europe, a PFS is regulated as a medicinal product o A technical dossier needs to be established o Safety and performance requirements must be met (as for a medical device)
  • 25.
    25 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com SO…HOW DO YOU ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE? Stupid answer: …you comply with medical device regulations… A bit more useful answer:  Choose a modular approach (generate modules of documentation for reuse you suspect you will need in the future  Describe the combination product as (1) the medicinal product with it’s indication for use (2) the medical device components and their performance criteria (3) the combination of the medicinal product and the medical device components, including demonstration of performance criteria and usability
  • 26.
    26 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com  A well maintained DHF for a medical device contains dozens of documents referencing each other  Subject to audits by regulatory agencies or Notified Bodies  The TFTOC is more or less prescribed within 21 CFR 820 and ISO 13485  There must be a smarter way to comply A COMPLETE DHF ? FOR A SYRINGE ??
  • 27.
    27 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com 1. A modular approach is the easiest way to address the need to conform with the essential requirements for medical devices 1. For a prefilled syringe with NSD three components of the Technical File are required: Module describing the PFS Module describing the NSD Combination module MANAGING THE BURDEN OF TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION
  • 28.
    28 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com 1. Biosimilars, like any combination product have to fulfill the essential requirements for safety and performance of the device used in the combination 2. Increasingly important: the usability of the product has to be built into the design (usually done by performing formative usability studies) and demonstrated/validated (usually in a summative handling study) 3. Biosimilars may not be superior to the originator, however the device used in the combination may be under certain conditions GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE USE OF MEDICAL DEVICES WITH BIOSIMILARS
  • 29.
    29 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com DO BIOSIMILARS HAVE TO USE THE SAME DEVICES AS THE ORIGINATOR? Guidance for Industry on Biosimilars: Q & As Regarding Implementation of the BPCI Act of 2009: Questions and Answers Part I http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm259809.htm
  • 30.
    30 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com How Biosimilar Developers Can Benefit from Medical Devices 4
  • 31.
    31 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com ACHIEVING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE THROUGH DEVICE IMPROVEMENTS Trend from vials to prefilled syringes to autoinjectors: 1. Better usability, especially in indications with tactile and sensory impairments 2. Higher perceived and actual value 3. Better branding and brand recognition 4. IP protection around the device 5. Long changeover periods
  • 32.
    32 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com DEVICE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE SAME CATEGORY Concrete example: Needle Safety Device (NSD) Areas of improvement:  Finger flange: ensure better grip  Shape and size of plunger rod base: ensure better grip  Shape and size of window: improve readability  Additional safety features: NSD housing snaps into plunger rod base  All changes supported by human factors studies and documentation available to customer
  • 33.
    33 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com DIFFERENTIATION AND BRANDING Example: Human Growth Hormone Market – Which ones are the biosimilar products?? (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
  • 34.
    34 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com Case Studies 5
  • 35.
    35 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com CASE 1: IMPROVED NSD Biosimilar may have an edge over competition Case of a biosimilar developer: • Originator markets one of the devices to the left in combination with the biologic • The device manufacturer now offers an improved version of the NSD, complete with supporting documentation (performance data, usability data) • Originator AND biosimilar competiion face several hurdles: • Regulatory hurdle • Cost of change-over • Finding a CMO for a relatively new device
  • 36.
    36 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com CASE 2: IMPROVED AUTOINJECTOR Improved device for a human growth hormone biosimilar: Benefits from the change:  Higher attractiveness attracts new patients  New features improve usability (pre-set dose)  Helpful in tender markets where device aspects are considered  Marketing argument  IP around the device
  • 37.
    37 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com CASE 3: IMPROVED DISPOSABLE PEN Disease Area: Rheumathoid Arthritis (RA) • Obvious and significant differences in usability • Many products on the market allow for significant improvements • Opportunity to improve, differentiate, and leverage a success factor other than price and date of entry
  • 38.
    38 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com Conclusions 6
  • 39.
    39 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com CONCLUSIONS 1. Regulators support improvements under certain conditions 2. Biosimilars can (and are) improving within product categories, gaining a competitive edge over biosimilar and originator competitors 3. Biosimilars can improve across categories (for example replace prefilled syringes with autoinjectors) 4. Improvements on the device level are accepted, effective differentiators, and provide a sustainable competitive advantage
  • 40.
    40 | Introductionto anteris medical www.anteris-medical.com Any questions? You can find me at dk@anteris-medical.com www.anteris-medical.com THANKYOU !