Mapping Lived Place
Dr. Luigina Ciolfi, Interaction Design Centre
University of Limerick (Ireland)
IDC: Multi-disciplinary research group (psychology, communication,
computer science, art & design, architecture, sociology, media studies, etc)

Design, development and deployment of interactive technologies for
human use

Human-centred approach

Technology as mediation tool in human activity and as methodological tool
for empirical research
Study and design of technological interventions within
the physical world through notions of space and place

Tradition of phenomenological geography (Tuan,
Relph)

Experiential aspects of place: personal, social, cultural,
spatial. Agency, placemaking

Augmentation of physical environments

The experience of mobility, work in progress
“the scene of an experience of relations
       with the world” (Auge’, 1995)
                                   


How do we experience place?
“To live in a place means to experience it,
to be aware of it in the bones as well as in
the head. Place, at all scales from the
armchair to the nation, is a construct of
experience; it is sustained not only by
timber, concrete, and highways, but also
by the quality of human awareness” (Yi-
Fu Tuan, 1975)
Articulation of place
 (Ciolfi, 2003; Ciolfi and Bannon, 2005)

                      Physical/structural
                                Personal
                                   Social
                                 Cultural

   Place as an articulation of emergent
experience alongside these dimensions.

                       Spatial extension
                               Embodied
                               Emergent
Influenced by cultural and social factors
                      Personal (agency)
“Experience is compounded of feeling and
thought. Human feeling is not a succession of
discrete sensations; rather memory and
anticipation are able to wield sensory impacts
into a shifting stream of experience so that we
may speak of a life of feeling as we do of a life of
thought. 
(Yi-Fu Tuan,1977)
Mobility as a situated experience,

Vs. many views in the Interaction Design field of
mobility as place-less

Study of human practices and experiences on the
move: use of techniques that are less used in the
Interaction Design field, but quite consolidated in
geography and other human sciences, such as
walkthroughs/ walk alongs and mapmaking
Overview: experience of path-space
          why maps can be useful?
          what can they represent?

Elements: terrain
          landmarks
          labels
          connectors/flows
          boundaries

Examples: “NomadS” Project

Some practice - hopefully!
Studying the emergence of practices and experience
throughout a physical environment

How does place (lived space) become part of practices
and activities? Importance of grounding human
experiences in the physical world

Path-space (Bollnow, Ingold, Tuan), agency
“Walking (…) is much like talking, and both are
quintessential features of what we take to be a human
form of life. We are already talking by the time we realize
that this is what we are doing”

“Knowledge and footprints, it would seem, lie on opposite
sides of a division between the mental and the material: on
the one side the mental content that we take with us into
our encounter with the world; on the other the marks left
after we are gone”

(Ingold & Vergunst, “Ways of Walking”, 2008)
Map making is part of narrative
enquiry through a space, to highlight
how the features of the physical
space are embodied in personal
narratives.

Ethnographically-based method, to be
used in conjunction with other
methods.
Situatedness of emergent experience: elements of the
environment are not simply a physical support, or triggers
for behaviour, they are essential elements of the
structure of values and meanings we attribute to
situations

Movement as constituent of experience of place

Movement as unfolding of meanings and narratives
Mapmaking
      Maps: representations of geographical space
through the perspective of the mapmaker, who chooses
which aspects of the space to highlight and connect

       “(…) Part of what fascinates us when looking at a
map is inhabiting the mind of its maker, considering that
particular terrain of imagination overlaid with those
unique contour lines of experience. If I had mapped that
landscape, we ask ourselves, what would I have chosen
to show, and how would I have shown it?” (Harmon,
2004: p.11)
Mapmaking

Maps are personal representations of lived paths: path is
not just movement but the unfolding of an experiential
narrative

Experiential artefacts scattered along the way

Association of meaning (values, culture, identity)
“The mapmaker has to simplify, selecting only those
elements of reality that he or she considers to be
necessary to serve their (…) purpose

(…) Usually the subjectivity of maps is concealed
because the user shares the values of the mapmaker
(…) Indeed the most fascinating and valuable aspect of
the subjectivity of all maps lies in the mirror that they
provide into the mentalities of mapmakers and their
societies (…) Often maps will reveal more about attitudes
and objectives than their makers would normally trust to
put into writing”

(Carlucci & Barber, “Lie of the Land”, 2001)
Mapmaking is a proactive exercise: re-establish the
elements of place experience.

What do we ask people to do when we invite them to
draw a map?

Exercise can be workshop style, or interview style: be
careful in planning ahead. What are your questions?
What is the goal of the mapmaking session? How does it
fit with the rest of your fieldwork?
Elements: terrain
         landmarks
         labels
         connectors/flows
         boundaries
Elements: terrain
What is the canvas? Empty or partly filled? What does it
represent, what is its scale?
Landmarks
What are the point of references? Are some given or the
canvas is left entirely empty? Codes or lifelike? Providing
landmarks guides the participants’ work
Labels
How will the map be labelled? Freedom to choose own
labels or pre-made ones? Natural language or symbols?
What’s in a label? Importance of place names/language
(e.g. political, value-laden)
Connectors/flows
A map represents place but also paths, connections and
sequences of events. Connectors create a narrative.
Providing participants with types of connectors, or
allowing them to create their own?
Boundaries
What is inside or outside a certain area? What
differences does a boundary mark? Different types of
boundaries: fluid or fixed; official or perceived; personal
or shared
In planning mapmaking exercises:

- Focus

-  Scale

- Contribution of participants

- Preparation of materials (as if of questions)

- Technology can help
Case Study: NomadS

Study of workers (sales
representatives), who spend their
working week on the move

Each work-place has different
meanings and associations to
them, so has the movement
between locations

Mapmaking as a way of
representing their “terrain of
activities”

Analysis: multi-layered notion of
place
Conclusions

- Importance of methods to study people’s
emergent experience of place on the move

- Situatedness of meaning making practices

- Movement as unfolding of meanings and
narratives within the environment. Physical world
is more than a constraint

- Importance of studying these aspects as part of
place enquiry
Thanks!

              Luigina.Ciolfi@ul.ie
                 www.idc.ul.ie

Find us on Facebook and Twitter (UL Interaction
                Design Centre)

Mapping Lived Place

  • 1.
    Mapping Lived Place Dr.Luigina Ciolfi, Interaction Design Centre University of Limerick (Ireland)
  • 2.
    IDC: Multi-disciplinary researchgroup (psychology, communication, computer science, art & design, architecture, sociology, media studies, etc) Design, development and deployment of interactive technologies for human use Human-centred approach Technology as mediation tool in human activity and as methodological tool for empirical research
  • 3.
    Study and designof technological interventions within the physical world through notions of space and place Tradition of phenomenological geography (Tuan, Relph) Experiential aspects of place: personal, social, cultural, spatial. Agency, placemaking Augmentation of physical environments The experience of mobility, work in progress
  • 4.
    “the scene ofan experience of relations with the world” (Auge’, 1995) How do we experience place?
  • 5.
    “To live ina place means to experience it, to be aware of it in the bones as well as in the head. Place, at all scales from the armchair to the nation, is a construct of experience; it is sustained not only by timber, concrete, and highways, but also by the quality of human awareness” (Yi- Fu Tuan, 1975)
  • 6.
    Articulation of place (Ciolfi, 2003; Ciolfi and Bannon, 2005) Physical/structural Personal Social Cultural Place as an articulation of emergent experience alongside these dimensions. Spatial extension Embodied Emergent Influenced by cultural and social factors Personal (agency)
  • 7.
    “Experience is compoundedof feeling and thought. Human feeling is not a succession of discrete sensations; rather memory and anticipation are able to wield sensory impacts into a shifting stream of experience so that we may speak of a life of feeling as we do of a life of thought. (Yi-Fu Tuan,1977)
  • 8.
    Mobility as asituated experience, Vs. many views in the Interaction Design field of mobility as place-less Study of human practices and experiences on the move: use of techniques that are less used in the Interaction Design field, but quite consolidated in geography and other human sciences, such as walkthroughs/ walk alongs and mapmaking
  • 9.
    Overview: experience ofpath-space why maps can be useful? what can they represent? Elements: terrain landmarks labels connectors/flows boundaries Examples: “NomadS” Project Some practice - hopefully!
  • 10.
    Studying the emergenceof practices and experience throughout a physical environment How does place (lived space) become part of practices and activities? Importance of grounding human experiences in the physical world Path-space (Bollnow, Ingold, Tuan), agency
  • 11.
    “Walking (…) ismuch like talking, and both are quintessential features of what we take to be a human form of life. We are already talking by the time we realize that this is what we are doing” “Knowledge and footprints, it would seem, lie on opposite sides of a division between the mental and the material: on the one side the mental content that we take with us into our encounter with the world; on the other the marks left after we are gone” (Ingold & Vergunst, “Ways of Walking”, 2008)
  • 12.
    Map making ispart of narrative enquiry through a space, to highlight how the features of the physical space are embodied in personal narratives. Ethnographically-based method, to be used in conjunction with other methods.
  • 13.
    Situatedness of emergentexperience: elements of the environment are not simply a physical support, or triggers for behaviour, they are essential elements of the structure of values and meanings we attribute to situations Movement as constituent of experience of place Movement as unfolding of meanings and narratives
  • 14.
    Mapmaking Maps: representations of geographical space through the perspective of the mapmaker, who chooses which aspects of the space to highlight and connect “(…) Part of what fascinates us when looking at a map is inhabiting the mind of its maker, considering that particular terrain of imagination overlaid with those unique contour lines of experience. If I had mapped that landscape, we ask ourselves, what would I have chosen to show, and how would I have shown it?” (Harmon, 2004: p.11)
  • 15.
    Mapmaking Maps are personalrepresentations of lived paths: path is not just movement but the unfolding of an experiential narrative Experiential artefacts scattered along the way Association of meaning (values, culture, identity)
  • 16.
    “The mapmaker hasto simplify, selecting only those elements of reality that he or she considers to be necessary to serve their (…) purpose (…) Usually the subjectivity of maps is concealed because the user shares the values of the mapmaker (…) Indeed the most fascinating and valuable aspect of the subjectivity of all maps lies in the mirror that they provide into the mentalities of mapmakers and their societies (…) Often maps will reveal more about attitudes and objectives than their makers would normally trust to put into writing” (Carlucci & Barber, “Lie of the Land”, 2001)
  • 17.
    Mapmaking is aproactive exercise: re-establish the elements of place experience. What do we ask people to do when we invite them to draw a map? Exercise can be workshop style, or interview style: be careful in planning ahead. What are your questions? What is the goal of the mapmaking session? How does it fit with the rest of your fieldwork?
  • 18.
    Elements: terrain landmarks labels connectors/flows boundaries
  • 19.
    Elements: terrain What isthe canvas? Empty or partly filled? What does it represent, what is its scale?
  • 20.
    Landmarks What are thepoint of references? Are some given or the canvas is left entirely empty? Codes or lifelike? Providing landmarks guides the participants’ work
  • 21.
    Labels How will themap be labelled? Freedom to choose own labels or pre-made ones? Natural language or symbols? What’s in a label? Importance of place names/language (e.g. political, value-laden)
  • 22.
    Connectors/flows A map representsplace but also paths, connections and sequences of events. Connectors create a narrative. Providing participants with types of connectors, or allowing them to create their own?
  • 23.
    Boundaries What is insideor outside a certain area? What differences does a boundary mark? Different types of boundaries: fluid or fixed; official or perceived; personal or shared
  • 24.
    In planning mapmakingexercises: - Focus -  Scale - Contribution of participants - Preparation of materials (as if of questions) - Technology can help
  • 26.
    Case Study: NomadS Studyof workers (sales representatives), who spend their working week on the move Each work-place has different meanings and associations to them, so has the movement between locations Mapmaking as a way of representing their “terrain of activities” Analysis: multi-layered notion of place
  • 27.
    Conclusions - Importance of methodsto study people’s emergent experience of place on the move - Situatedness of meaning making practices - Movement as unfolding of meanings and narratives within the environment. Physical world is more than a constraint - Importance of studying these aspects as part of place enquiry
  • 28.
    Thanks! Luigina.Ciolfi@ul.ie www.idc.ul.ie Find us on Facebook and Twitter (UL Interaction Design Centre)