The document summarizes the successful transfer and qualification of Nitronex's GaN HEMT process to foundry partner GCS. It describes a 3-phase project involving module development, integration lots, and qualification lots. Key aspects like epi, contacts, and passivation were matched, while minor changes were made. Integration lots initially showed a leakage issue traced to the ohmic RTA chamber being contaminated from GaAs processing. Replacing the chamber resolved the problem. Final qualification lots met all of Nitronex's specifications, verifying the entire GCS process.
Installation of a High Purity Water and WFI system with no unplanned downtime.
Latest available technology including online monitoring Microbial Detection, Reduced water consumption with start / stop / sanitize cycles of water pretreatment equipment.
Both systems designed with full redundancy to provide reliability.
Yokogawa in the LNG supply chain | VigilantPlantYokogawa
Brochure about Yokogawa's presence in the LNG supply chain. Yokogawa's VigilantPlant delivers visibility, predictability and agility for your LNG business; whether in liquefaction, transportation or regasification.
Installation of a High Purity Water and WFI system with no unplanned downtime.
Latest available technology including online monitoring Microbial Detection, Reduced water consumption with start / stop / sanitize cycles of water pretreatment equipment.
Both systems designed with full redundancy to provide reliability.
Yokogawa in the LNG supply chain | VigilantPlantYokogawa
Brochure about Yokogawa's presence in the LNG supply chain. Yokogawa's VigilantPlant delivers visibility, predictability and agility for your LNG business; whether in liquefaction, transportation or regasification.
Drilling systems automation is the real-time reliance on digital technology in creating a wellbore. It encompasses downhole tools and systems, surface drilling equipment, remote monitoring and the use of models and simulations while drilling. While its scope is large, its potential benefits are impressive, among them: fewer workers exposed to rig-floor hazards, the ability to realize repeatable performance drilling, and lower drilling risk. While drilling systems automation includes new drilling technology, it is most importantly a collaborative infrastructure for performance drilling. In 2008, a small group of engineers and scientists attending an SPE conference noted that automation was becoming a key topic in drilling and they formed a technical section to investigate it further. By 2015, the group reached a membership of sixteen hundred as the technology rapidly gaining acceptance. Why so much interest? The benefits and promises of an automated approach to drilling address the safety and fundamental economics of drilling. What will it take? Among the answers are an open collaborative digital environment at the wellsite, an openness of mind to digital technologies, and modified or new business practices. What are the barriers? The primary barrier is a lack of understanding and a fear of automation. When will it happen? It is happening now. Digital technologies are transforming the infrastructure of the drilling industry. Drilling systems automation uses this infrastructure to deliver safety and performance, and address cost.
Review of current approaches to testing software.
Goal is to promote understanding of the need for designing blended approaches, where different techniques are used for different purposes.
To share the idea that each software ecosystem has unique set of concerns that can only be addressed effectively by mixing up some of the presented techniques in balanced proportions.
To understand, at times when highly heterogeneous distributed software architectures become commodity, it is important to re-define concepts such as quality, correctness and robustness to prevent loosing predictability of system behavior.
As we have seen with the advent of the shale oil revolution in the United States, the development of new technology plays an important role in the oil and gas industry. It’s an enabler in reducing capital costs, simplifying production and increasing capacity of new or existing facilities. It can make a marginal project into a profitable development.
Progressing technology, while dealing with significant risk, is a challenge that can be overcome through a technology qualification process. A Technology Qualification Program (TQP) provides a means to identifying the risks and taking the correct steps to mitigate it; not avoid it.
This lecture summarizes the required steps involved in qualifying technology and how to keep track of technology development through the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) ranking system. In addition, some of the pitfalls in executing a TQP program are identified and discussed with emphasis on both component and system testing. Examples are given to illustrate the danger in taking shortcuts when executing the qualification plan.
Data from a recent subsea separation qualification program is presented comparing test results between CFDs, model fluid and actual crude testing at operating conditions. Knowing the limitations of the tools and testing system selected is an important step in closing the gaps identified in the TQP program.
The TRL has evolved at a faster pace and has become more acceptable in the oil and gas industry then the TQP. Nonetheless, continued standardization of both the TQP and TRL is still necessary in order to reduce overall cost of developing technology and allow faster implementation.
Advanced Pipeline Risk Assessment vs. Simplified NACE StandardsDavid Richardson
NACE - ICDA standards for wet-gas and normally dry gas are founded on our ICPT-PM advanced hazard modelling algorithms.
ICPT-PM pin-points the most probable locations of corrosion and the severity of corrosion damage accumulated over-life metal loss along the pipeline; prioritized regions for integrity validation.
ICPT-PM provides mitigation guidance for Production Operations
action to prevent corrosion initiation action plan to prevent growth of pre-existing corrosion damage.
Drilling systems automation is the real-time reliance on digital technology in creating a wellbore. It encompasses downhole tools and systems, surface drilling equipment, remote monitoring and the use of models and simulations while drilling. While its scope is large, its potential benefits are impressive, among them: fewer workers exposed to rig-floor hazards, the ability to realize repeatable performance drilling, and lower drilling risk. While drilling systems automation includes new drilling technology, it is most importantly a collaborative infrastructure for performance drilling. In 2008, a small group of engineers and scientists attending an SPE conference noted that automation was becoming a key topic in drilling and they formed a technical section to investigate it further. By 2015, the group reached a membership of sixteen hundred as the technology rapidly gaining acceptance. Why so much interest? The benefits and promises of an automated approach to drilling address the safety and fundamental economics of drilling. What will it take? Among the answers are an open collaborative digital environment at the wellsite, an openness of mind to digital technologies, and modified or new business practices. What are the barriers? The primary barrier is a lack of understanding and a fear of automation. When will it happen? It is happening now. Digital technologies are transforming the infrastructure of the drilling industry. Drilling systems automation uses this infrastructure to deliver safety and performance, and address cost.
Review of current approaches to testing software.
Goal is to promote understanding of the need for designing blended approaches, where different techniques are used for different purposes.
To share the idea that each software ecosystem has unique set of concerns that can only be addressed effectively by mixing up some of the presented techniques in balanced proportions.
To understand, at times when highly heterogeneous distributed software architectures become commodity, it is important to re-define concepts such as quality, correctness and robustness to prevent loosing predictability of system behavior.
As we have seen with the advent of the shale oil revolution in the United States, the development of new technology plays an important role in the oil and gas industry. It’s an enabler in reducing capital costs, simplifying production and increasing capacity of new or existing facilities. It can make a marginal project into a profitable development.
Progressing technology, while dealing with significant risk, is a challenge that can be overcome through a technology qualification process. A Technology Qualification Program (TQP) provides a means to identifying the risks and taking the correct steps to mitigate it; not avoid it.
This lecture summarizes the required steps involved in qualifying technology and how to keep track of technology development through the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) ranking system. In addition, some of the pitfalls in executing a TQP program are identified and discussed with emphasis on both component and system testing. Examples are given to illustrate the danger in taking shortcuts when executing the qualification plan.
Data from a recent subsea separation qualification program is presented comparing test results between CFDs, model fluid and actual crude testing at operating conditions. Knowing the limitations of the tools and testing system selected is an important step in closing the gaps identified in the TQP program.
The TRL has evolved at a faster pace and has become more acceptable in the oil and gas industry then the TQP. Nonetheless, continued standardization of both the TQP and TRL is still necessary in order to reduce overall cost of developing technology and allow faster implementation.
Advanced Pipeline Risk Assessment vs. Simplified NACE StandardsDavid Richardson
NACE - ICDA standards for wet-gas and normally dry gas are founded on our ICPT-PM advanced hazard modelling algorithms.
ICPT-PM pin-points the most probable locations of corrosion and the severity of corrosion damage accumulated over-life metal loss along the pipeline; prioritized regions for integrity validation.
ICPT-PM provides mitigation guidance for Production Operations
action to prevent corrosion initiation action plan to prevent growth of pre-existing corrosion damage.
Potential PM2.5 and CPM Pitfalls in Permitting, Testing, and ComplianceAll4 Inc.
Glenn Rives of International Paper and John Egan of All4 Inc. present the Potential PM2.5 and CPM Pitfalls in Permitting, Testing, and Compliance at the NCASI Southern Regional Meeting on June 10, 2014. In this presentation, they discuss PSD applicability, permitting strategy, compliance testing results, and planning around permitting, testing, and compliance.
Addressing Uncertainty How to Model and Solve Energy Optimization Problemsoptimizatiodirectdirect
During the past twenty years, IBM's CPLEX Optimization Studio has been used extensively to solve hard Energy Optimization Problems. CPLEX Optimization Studio's modeling capabilities, fast solvers and easy deployment features empower users to deploy energy applications quickly and reliably. Now, with a newly update superset offering know as Decision Optimization Center, the capabilities for this class of problems is greatly enhanced. Using the Unit Commitment Problem as a paradigm, we will demonstrate the advantages of using Decision Optimization Center, and CPLEX for modeling complex problems and application developments in the Energy Field.
Most importantly we will introduce new research developed for solving problems that address Uncertainty. We will showcase a new research approach that allows the user to test and deploy Stochastic, Robust or Deterministic models all on the same platform. This new approach allows you to truly understand your options as you explore the best plan for your business and develop a robust and repeatable process.
Solar energy ongoing project by Alejandro PérezASCAME
The energy model on which the majority of cities in developed countries are based upon is characterized by centralization and unsustainability. Barcelona, being a Mediterranean city, faces the challenge to increase its solar energy supply, moving towards a more sustainable energy model, while strengthening the network's business sector.
ASCAME is committed to this initiative, in the framework of the European project FOSTEr in MED gathering together in the auditorium of the Chamber of Commerce, Industry and Navigation of Barcelona, several experts in the field of renewable energy, as well as companies, public authorities, universities and organizations that will analyse the state of sector, its’ trends and the business development scenario emerged.
ETC 2013 Improved Efficiency & Reliability for Data Center Servers Using Imme...
MANTECH Presentation v1
1. GaN on Si HEMT Process
Transfer and Qualification
Nitronex Corporation &
Global Communication Semiconductors
2. Nitronex Corporation
Overview
• Purpose of outsourcing wafer fabrication
– Goal: Improve manufacturability and
technology leadership
– Partnership: Long-term agreement with GCS
to provide exclusive foundry services
– Implementation: Three Phase Project
• Module: Groups of process steps
• Integration: Start to finish lot processing
• Qualification: Verification of entire process
– Results: GCS process met all qualification
requirements
7. Nitronex Corporation
Module Flow
• For module development we used a
hybrid process to determine whether
module met acceptance criteria
– Initial lot processing at Nitronex
– Specific module lot processing at GCS
• Only after successful module development
– Balance of lot processing at Nitronex
• PCM Testing at Both Fabs
• Data Review / Follow-up Actions
• Formal Report / Acceptance
See appendix for test limits
8. Nitronex Corporation
PECVD Module Challenge
Difficulty matching Nitronex Silicon Nitride
• GCS Plasma-Therm PECVD
– no backup tool; primarily development use
– Film had 100% higher wet etch rate
• GCS Novellus PECVD – Primary Choice
– Two Production tools; provides redundancy
– Met all unit specs, except stress
– Required significant development
9. Nitronex Corporation
PECVD Solution
• Novellus film’s tensile stress decreased
adding low frequency RF component
• Concern of damage to GaN surface
prevented using low frequency RF
• Unaxis film’s low tensile stress obtained
by controlling carrier flow ratio1
without LF
RF
• Acceptably low stress film achieved on
Novellus without LF RF by controlling
carrier gas flow ratio[1] Kenneth D. Mackenzie, Brad Reelfs, Michael W. DeVre,
Russell Westerman, and David J. Johnson, CS Mantech (2004)
10. Nitronex Corporation
New GCS Novellus PECVD Film
Meets All Specs
GCS PECVD Nitronex
GCS Module Lot Meets Acceptance
Criteria for On-Wafer Saturated Power
GCS Passivation Module Lots
On-wafer Saturated Power*
Psat(W/mm)
target
USL
Device
2mm CPW
10x200um
Test Plan
f=2.14Ghz
CW
Vds=28V
Idsq=55mA
Fixed standard
production
impedance
* Testing performed at Nitronex
11. Nitronex Corporation
Integration Phase
• Successful completion of all modules
• Integration lots processed entirely at GCS
• New drain leakage problem surfaced 1st
Integration lot
Integration
Phase
100V IDLK*
Id: mA/mm
Vds=100V
Vgs=-8V
Wg=100um
12. Nitronex Corporation
Leakage Problem
• Wafer process timeline points to Ohmic
module cause of leakage
• Leakage not historically associated with
ohmic module at Nitronex
• Available qual lot converted into DOE
• DOE Isolated problem to Ohmic RTA
• 2nd
DOE Confirmed RTA Problem
13. Nitronex Corporation
Leakage Problem Resolved
• Logsheet indicated RTA system ran GaAs
wafers before integration phase
• Problem correlated to visual appearance
– Alloyed ohmic morphology changed
• New quartz chamber resolved issue
• Concluded ohmic module leakage
problem caused by contaminated
chamber
• Segregated GaN and GaAs to prevent
reoccurrence
14. Nitronex Corporation
Ohmic Metal Morphology
Difference
CONTROLS
1. Temperature: both at 880 °C
2. Atmosphere: both in N2
3. No Exhaust Leak
4. Pre-alloy descum: both at NTX
GCS OH RTA
Nitronex OH RTA
After replacing RTA chamber,
GCS RTA’ed film looks similar
to Nitronex alloyed ohmic film
15. Nitronex Corporation
Qualification Phase
• 4 distinct lot sampled
• Followed Nitronex standard production
assembly flow
• NPTB00025 Device
– 8mm 25 Watt Broadband HFET
• GCS fabricated devices passed all
Nitronex process qualification
specifications (see table next slide)
16. Nitronex Corporation 16
GCS NRF1 Process Qualification
Requirements
Note: All sample sizes reflect LTPD level 5
17. Nitronex Corporation
Conclusions
• Nitronex GaN HEMT NRF1 process successfully
transferred and qualified at GCS
– Meets in-line PCM specifications
– Meets process qualification requirements
• Including 1000 hour HTOL
• MMIC process also qualified
– NRF1 GaN process is highly compatible with existing GaAs
process fabrication, but requires:
• Specifically tailored Silicon Nitride film
• Separate Ohmic RTA due to susceptibility to GaAs contamination
– Partnership with GCS Provides Additional Benefits
• Production tool set reduces handling defects
• Redundant equipment providing backup
• Lower overall cost and increased capacity
• All positive tone photoresist provides improved resolution, metal
liftoff and cleanliness
• 0.25µm capability enables future X- and Ku-band devices/MMIC’s
18. Nitronex Corporation
Acknowledgements
• Nitronex Team
– John Bell, Jeannette James, John Kearney,
Brad Krongard, Tom Lepkowski, Pradeep
Rajagopal, Brook Raymond, James Shen,
Keith Will
• GCS Team Members
– Chung-hsu Chen, Minkar Chen, Daniel Hou,
Chuanxin Lian, Libo Song, William Sutton,
Alex Vigo, Chao Wang, David Wang,
Shiguang Wang
20. Nitronex Corporation
Parameter Description Units LSL TGT USL
W_CRBME Epitaxial Effective Line Width (9um nominal) um 8.5 9 9.5
RSH_CRBTF Thin Film Sheet Resistance Ohm/sq 19.0 20.0 21.0
W_CRBTF Thin Film Effective Line Width (10um nom.) um 8.5 9 9.5
TF_TCR_RSH Temerature Coeficient - Thin Film Sheet Resistance ppm/C - 100 -
CAP_MIM MIM Capacitance fF/um2
0.144 0.15 0.156
MIM_ILK_100 MIM Capacitance Leakage Current at 100V uA/mm
2
- 3.00E-03 1
Parameter Description Units LSL TGT USL
NPSAT_W_MM Saturated Output Power W/mm 3.4 3.9 -
DEFF_MAX Drain Efficiency at Maximum Saturated Power % 57 62 -
Discrete + MMIC Process
Specifications
DC Specifications
DC Specifications – MMIC Specific
RF Specifications
The wafers are tested against requirements at key points in the process similar to
a GaAs foundry