Literature Review Scoring GuideDue Date End of Unit 6Pe.docx

•Download as DOCX, PDF•

0 likes•4 views

Literature Review Scoring Guide Due Date: End of Unit 6 Percentage of Course Grade: 15%. CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Identify relevant ABA concepts, principles, and methods for behavioral challenges in research. 27% Does not identify relevant ABA concepts, principles, and methods for behavioral challenges in research. Identifies some relevant ABA concepts, principles, and methods for behavioral challenges in research, but not all of the research is behavior analytic in nature. Identifies relevant ABA concepts, principles, and methods for behavioral challenges in research. Identifies relevant ABA concepts, principles, and methods for behavioral challenges in research; and explains how they relate to the target behaviors chosen. Compare theoretical underpinnings of the chosen research. 26% Does not compare theoretical underpinnings of the chosen research. Compares only a few theoretical underpinnings of the chosen research, and only at a basic level. Compares theoretical underpinnings of the chosen research. Compares theoretical underpinnings of the chosen research; justifies the importance of evaluating commonalities and differences in the research and synthesizes conclusions to determine interventions. Evaluate research studies to distinguish purpose, benefits, strengths, and weaknesses in applied behavior analysis. 27% Does not describe research studies to distinguish purpose, benefits, strengths, and weaknesses in applied behavior analysis. Describes research studies to distinguish purpose, benefits, strengths, and weaknesses in applied behavior analysis, but provides little or no evaluation. Evaluates research studies to distinguish purpose, benefits, strengths, and weaknesses in applied behavior analysis. Evaluates research studies to distinguish purpose, benefits, strengths, and weaknesses in applied behavior analysis; demonstrates superior familiarity with the range of scholarly works in the ABA field. Demonstrate an academic writing style through well- organized prose that follows assignment guidelines. 10% Does not demonstrate an academic writing style. Demonstrates minimally acceptable writing style, with instances of disorganization, grammatical or mechanical errors, or does not follow all assignment guidelines. Demonstrates an academic writing style through well- organized prose that follows assignment guidelines. Demonstrates an academic writing style through well- organized prose that contains no significant grammatical or mechanical errors and follows assignment guidelines. Demonstrate compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines. 10% Does not demonstrate compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines. Demonstrates minimally acceptable compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines. Demonstrates compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines. Develops a paper that is fully compliant with APA style, citatio.

Education

research is behavior
analytic in nature.
Identifies
relevant ABA
concepts,
principles, and
methods for
behavioral
challenges in
research.
Identifies relevant ABA
concepts, principles, and
methods for behavioral
challenges in research; and
explains how they relate to the
target behaviors chosen.
Compare theoretical
underpinnings of
the chosen
research.
26%
Does not
compare
theoretical
underpinnings of
the chosen
research.
Compares only a few
theoretical
underpinnings of the
chosen research, and

only at a basic level.
Compares
theoretical
underpinnings of
the chosen
research.
Compares theoretical
underpinnings of the chosen
research; justifies the
importance of evaluating
commonalities and differences
in the research and
synthesizes conclusions to
determine interventions.
Evaluate research
studies to
distinguish purpose,
benefits, strengths,
and weaknesses in
applied behavior
analysis.
27%
Does not describe
research studies
to distinguish
purpose, benefits,
strengths, and
weaknesses in
applied behavior
analysis.
Describes research

studies to distinguish
purpose, benefits,
strengths, and
weaknesses in applied
behavior analysis, but
provides little or no
evaluation.
Evaluates
research studies
to distinguish
purpose,
benefits,
strengths, and
weaknesses in
applied behavior
analysis.
Evaluates research studies to
distinguish purpose, benefits,
strengths, and weaknesses in
applied behavior analysis;
demonstrates superior
familiarity with the range of
scholarly works in the ABA
field.
Demonstrate an
academic writing
style through well-
organized prose that
follows assignment
guidelines.
10%
Does not

demonstrate an
academic writing
style.
Demonstrates minimally
acceptable writing style,
with instances of
disorganization,
grammatical or
mechanical errors, or
does not follow all
assignment guidelines.
Demonstrates
an academic
writing style
through well-
organized prose
that follows
assignment
guidelines.
Demonstrates an academic
writing style through well-
organized prose that contains
no significant grammatical or
mechanical errors and follows
assignment guidelines.
Demonstrate
compliance with
APA style, citation,
and referencing
guidelines.
10%

Does not
demonstrate
compliance with
APA style,
citation, and
referencing
guidelines.
Demonstrates minimally
acceptable compliance
with APA style, citation,
and referencing
guidelines.
Demonstrates
compliance with
APA style,
citation, and
referencing
guidelines.
Develops a paper that is fully
compliant with APA style,
citation, and referencing
guidelines.

Caregiver Quick Reference Guide Scoring Guide Due Date: End of Unit 9 Percentage of Course Grade: 10%. CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Define target behavior to be prioritized for intervention. 13% Does not identify target behavior to be prioritized for intervention. Attempts to define target behavior to be prioritized for intervention, but the definition is missing key elements or contains inaccurate information. Defines target behavior to be prioritized for intervention. Defines target behavior to be prioritized for intervention in an objective, clear, and discriminative manner so it lays the foundation for accurate and reliable measures. Explain the social significance of the target behavior. 13% Does not explain the social significance of the target behavior. Attempts to explain the social significance of the target behavior, but the explanation is inaccurate or is missing key points. Explains the social significance of the target behavior. Explains the social significance of the target behavior and supports conclusions with scholarly resources. Apply measurement, data display, and data-based decision-making skills to effect positive changes in human behavior. 13% Does not apply measurement, data display, and data- based decision- making skills to effect positive changes in human behavior. Applies some measurement, data display, and data- based decision- making skills to effect some positive changes in human behavior, but decisions are not appropriate to the situation. Applies measurement, data display, and data-based decision-making skills to effect positive changes in human behavior. Applies measurement, data display, and data-based decision-making skills to effect positive changes in human behavior, and distills the information to reflect only what is important for a particular audience. Describe assessment results and interventions. 13% Does not describe assessment results and interventions. Attempts to describe assessment results and interventions but the description is incomplete or inaccurate. Describes assessment results and interventions. Describes assessment results and interventions in language appropriate for laypersons. Evaluate key ABA concepts, theories, principles, and methods to analyze and change target behaviors using research. 14% Does not identify key ABA concepts, theories, principles, and methods to analyze and change target behaviors using research. Describes some relevant ABA concepts, theories, principles, and methods to analyze and change target behaviors, but the description does not use research. Evaluates key ABA concepts, theories, principles, and methods to analyze and change target behaviors using research. Evaluates key ABA concepts, theories, principles, and methods to analyze and change target behaviors using research; reports the research in a manner that is easy for a layperson to understand. CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISH.

Caregiver Quick Reference Guide Scoring GuideDue Date End

DinahShipman862

Research method critique on problem solving

Dana Dannawi

This document summarizes two research articles. For Article 1, it provides a brief overview of the purpose, methodology, results and lack of recommendations. For Article 2, it notes that while the purpose and introduction were clearly explained, some elements like the literature review and methodology were not fully described or defined. Both articles are critiqued on elements like validity, statistical analysis, discussion of findings and recommendations.

Write a 4-page assessment in which you describe the current unders.docx

salmonpybus

Write a 4-page assessment in which you describe the current understanding of motivation related to an identified behavior and discuss applications of research to social policies associated with that behavior. Suggested Resources The following optional resources are provided to support you in completing the assessment or to provide a helpful context. For additional resources, refer to the Research Resources and Supplemental Resources in the left navigation menu of your courseroom. Capella Resources Click the links provided to view the following resources: What Is Scholarly? SHOW LESS Library Resources The following e-books or articles from the Capella University Library are linked directly in this course: Whiteley, P. (2002). Motivation . Oxford, UK: Capstone Publishing. Armeli, S., Conner, T. S., Cullum, J., & Tennen, H. (2010). A longitudinal analysis of drinking motives moderating the negative affect-drinking association among college students . Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24 (1), 38–47. Molnar, D. S., Sadava, S. W., DeCourville, N. H., & Perrier, C. P. K. (2010). Attachment, motivations, and alcohol: Testing a dual-path model of high-risk drinking and adverse consequences in transitional clinical and student samples . Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 42 (1), 1–13. Litvin, E. B., & Brandon, T. H. (2010). Testing the influence of external and internal cues on smoking motivation using a community sample . Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 18 (1), 61–70. Course Library Guide A Capella University library guide has been created specifically for your use in this course. You are encouraged to refer to the resources in the PSYC-FP3770 – Psychology of Human Motivation and Performance Library Guide to help direct your research. Assessment Instructions For this assessment, identify a topic focused on one aspect of a behavior. Then research and write a paper that describes the current understanding of motivation related to the behavior you identified and discusses applications of research to social policies associated with that behavior. Assessment Preparation Select one of the following three broad areas of behavior: Eating behaviors. Intimacy behaviors. Drug use and addiction behaviors. Then identify a research topic associated with behavioral area you selected. An important skill in conducting research is to narrow the focus of your topic to keep the content manageable and to facilitate finding supportive evidence. To identify a properly narrow topic: Begin with your selected behavior and start to narrow the focus. See examples of topics listed below. You may use one of the examples or identify your own. Continue to narrow the focus of your topic with consideration for other relevant factors, such as age of the research subjects (adults versus children), their gender, their educational level, or other demographic or topical factors. Your goal is to identify a research topic that is appropriately narrow and can b.

With instructor approval, students will select an organization t.docx

adolphoyonker

With instructor approval, students will select an organization that either has or is experiencing challenges with its compensation and benefit system. The student will provide a brief historical view of the organization. The student should assess the company’s current challenge, review other organizations that had a similar situation (and the strategy they devised to address the issue), explore theories and strategies that should be contemplated to address the situation, and finally, include a recommendation to management regarding how to address/resolve the situation. Importantly, the student should ensure any recommendations are based on solid research and analysis and reflect a comprehensive solution to the problem. The Final Paper must include a minimum of eight credible sources (in addition to textbook). Research topics must be reviewed in advance with the instructor. Writing the Compensation and Benefits Paper This essay must reflect what is considered the current "state of the art" systems, reflecting both academic and professional (practical) orientations. The Final Paper must be 8-10 double-spaced pages (not including the title and reference pages) and be formatted according to APA style guidelines. This paper may be written in first person. This Final Paper should review the available research, discuss the implications of that research for the topic area, and provide conclusions. The paper should be organized into the following areas (use section headings to organize your key points): Introduction: The area of research should be described and the purpose of the research. That is, describe the topic area in terms of (a) its relationship to the topic and (b) what you want to be able to contribute to the training literature by writing this paper. Your introduction must include a succinct thesis statement. Review of the literature: Students must provide a brief historical view of the organization and assess the company’s current challenges. This review will include an examination of other organizations with similar situations, including the strategies used to address their issues. Students need to explore theories and strategies that could address the situation. Identify any areas that may have not been addressed in the literature used for review. Implications: Assess any implications. Organize the implications of the literature in a manner that logically builds the case for your recommendations. For each of your implications be sure to reference the literature related to that implication. Be sure to indicate whether the implication is one that has already been made in the literature or if this is one that is original to you through your own analysis. Recommendations: Based on the research, students must make recommendations for a comprehensive solution to the problem. This is where you tie all the pieces together. Make sure your recommendations are organized in a logical order that synthesizes your major points relative to.

Bowie State University Measuring the impact of COViD 19 on.pdf

bkbk37

This document is a request for an 8-page essay analyzing the impact of COVID-19 on mental health. The essay must be in APA format, cite multiple sources including a provided textbook, and use the "article critique assignment" document to organize the research article analysis. The student is asked to choose one of two provided research articles and follow guidelines for critiquing the various sections of the study.

Research Critique.pptx

Asokan R

This document provides guidelines for critiquing research. It defines a research critique as a critical evaluation of a research report that assesses its strengths and limitations. A critique involves carefully examining all aspects of a study to judge its merits, meaning and significance. It is important as it helps advance nursing knowledge and encourages evidence-based practice. The document outlines the process and elements to consider when critiquing different types of research, including assessing the research problem, methodology, results and conclusions. It provides criteria for evaluating both quantitative and qualitative studies to allow for a systematic and unbiased examination of a research report.

Measuring the impact of COViD 19 on Mental Health Essay.pdf

bkbk37

This document provides instructions and guidelines for writing an 8-page paper analyzing the impact of COVID-19 on mental health. It directs the student to choose one of two provided research articles, critique it using the provided template, and incorporate references to the assigned textbook in the paper. It also provides formatting guidelines, stating the paper should be in APA style with at least 8 pages of content, excluding front matter such as the title page and references.

This document provides an overview of critiquing research. It defines what is meant by being critical, defines a critical review, and discusses what a research critique entails. A research critique is described as a planned, careful evaluation of a research work to judge its strengths and weaknesses. The document outlines the importance, purposes, approaches, process, guidelines, and elements to consider when critiquing different aspects of a research study.

Quantitative Critique Research.docx

write22

This summary critiques a research article by Kalischuk et al. (2013) that examined the views of 331 nursing preceptors in Canada. The study used a questionnaire to assess preceptors' views on benefits and factors related to their role. While the problem and purpose were clear, the abstract lacked structure and variables were not well-defined. The literature review summarized past studies but lacked critical analysis. The conceptual framework was implicit and relationships between variables unclear. The methodology had limitations like a small sample size but data analysis was appropriately conducted. The discussion interpreted findings and implications but did not sufficiently tie back to the framework or suggest future research.

Running head QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE1QUALITATIVE RESEARC.docx

jeanettehully

Running head: QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE 1 QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE 3 Qualitative Research Critique [Student’s Name] PSY 326 Research Design [Instructor’s Name] [Date submitted] Qualitative Research Critique Introduction [Instructions for using this template: Replace the text in brackets on the title page with your information. Answer the questions and provide the required information indicated below, in the order these items are presented. Use complete sentences in your response and delete the question or instruction, including this paragraph, after you have finished typing your answers. Throughout the paper, cite the source of the information. List the references for all sources that are cited, as indicated in the note on the References page.] What is your purpose for writing this paper? What is the title of the study you are critiquing, and who are the authors? Summarize the research question(s) in your own words as much as possible. If your instructor allows quotes and you find it necessary to quote from the article, use quotation marks around the quoted passage and cite the quote in APA format with author’s last name, year of publication, and page number where the quoted material appeared. Briefly summarize background information on the topic from the study’s literature review. Comment on whether or not there is any apparent bias in the selection of studies in the literature review. Summary of Methods Which qualitative research design was used? Name the sampling method and describe how the participants were selected. How did the researchers collect data from the participants? Did the researchers mention bracketing, epoché, or reflexivity? What coding and analysis procedures were used to analyze the data? What efforts were made to ensure trustworthiness, credibility, and/or dependability? Summary of Findings What themes or other findings were presented in the study? Was sufficient evidence provided to support the conclusions drawn by the researchers? If so, what is the nature of the evidence? If not, what is missing? Ethical Aspects Did the researchers explicitly address ethical issues in the article? If not, was there evidence in the report that the participants’ wellbeing and confidentiality were protected? Was an approval process by an Institutional Review Board or similar ethics review committee mentioned? Were any of the practices ethically questionable? If so, what could have been done to resolve these issues? Evaluation of Study Referring to a source about the research design and methods used in this study to support your evaluation, do you feel the researchers used these methods appropriately to investigate the research question? What do you see as the strengths of how this study was done? What limitations or weaknesses were mentioned by the authors? What limitations do you see (if any) that they did not mention? What suggestions did the authors make for future research on the topic? Do you think another ap ...

research 7.docx

bkbk37

This document provides guidelines for writing a research critique assignment. Students are instructed to choose a primary research study related to nursing or medicine and write a 4-6 page critique evaluating the validity, relevance, and implications of the study. The critique should include sections that describe the research problem and purpose, review the literature, identify the theoretical framework and variables, analyze the methodology and data analysis, summarize conclusions and implications, and determine if findings can be generalized. A properly formatted APA research critique with the full study attached is required for the assignment.

impact of COViD 19.pdf

studywriters

Biology 199 Lecture 2 (Research Process)

Marilen Parungao

This document outlines the key steps in the research process, including: 1) Identifying a research problem and formulating objectives and hypotheses; 2) Reviewing relevant literature; 3) Identifying variables and developing a research design; 4) Collecting and analyzing data; and 5) Drawing conclusions and communicating findings. It emphasizes important considerations at each step like ensuring objectives are measurable and hypotheses are testable. The overall process is presented as a logical series of interconnected phases.

Biology 199 Lecture 2 (Research Process)

Marilen Parungao

This document discusses key aspects of the research process including: 1) Research is a problem-solving activity that follows logical steps known as the research process. The methodology controls how the study is conducted and data is analyzed. 2) Important steps in the research process include identifying a research problem, formulating objectives and testable hypotheses, reviewing related literature, delimiting the scope, and identifying relevant variables. 3) The research problem is the focus of the study. Objectives should be clear, measurable, and guide how the study is carried out. Hypotheses make testable statements about relationships between variables. 4) Proper research design ensures the plan for conducting the study answers the objectives and tests

Research Questions, Objectives, and Hypothesis

Ashok Pandey

Research Process

Vince Calantas

This document outlines the key phases of the research process, including the conceptual phase, design and planning phase, empirical and analytic phase, and dissemination phase. It discusses developing a research problem, reviewing relevant literature, formulating hypotheses and theoretical/conceptual frameworks, and defining key terms. The conceptual phase focuses on identifying a research problem, reviewing related literature, developing hypotheses and frameworks to guide the study, and defining important concepts and variables.

Literature review

swarwicktouro

This document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It explains that a literature review is important to identify what is already known about a topic and avoid duplicating previous research. A literature review should place the research in the context of prior work. Literature reviews can be done before and after selecting a research topic. The review should focus on peer-reviewed articles, with higher priority given to systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. The document provides tips for searching literature databases and grouping findings. The goal of a literature review is to justify the research and chosen methodology.

Research Critique.pptx

neeti70

This document provides guidance on how to conduct a critical appraisal or critique of a research report. It emphasizes that a critique requires careful examination of all aspects of a study, including its methodology, analysis, and conclusions. The critique should objectively assess both the strengths and limitations of the research. Key aspects that should be evaluated include the study's design, sampling approach, data collection and analysis methods, and whether ethical standards were upheld. The critique aims to advance scientific knowledge by helping to identify ways future studies could be improved.

Running Head PAPER CRITIQUE1PAPER CRITIQUE 5P.docx

todd581

Running Head: PAPER CRITIQUE 1 PAPER CRITIQUE 5 Paper Critique Student’s Name: Course Title: Course Number: Professor’s Name: Date: Paper Critique General Considerations The article on “Drinking Patterns and Dating Violence among College Students” is well written with simple language without spelling and grammatical errors. Due to this, the paper is generally easy to read, understand, and comprehend. The authors did a great job in organizing the article such that presentation of an idea leads to another. However, the authors were not prudent in identifying the introduction and literature review chapters. For articles like this, which involve a systematic approach towards obtaining results, it is important to present the work in chapters like introduction, literature review, methodology, data collection and analysis, as well as conclusion and recommendations for future research. Although the article captures most of these topics, the authors could have specifically presented the topics to help readers identify what to expect in a particular topic. The introduction, background of research, and literature review chapters are not clearly identified, and this presents a challenge to the readers regarding the presentation of the paper leading to methodology section. Title The title of the article “Drinking Patterns and Dating Violence among College Students” is appropriate and consistent with what the research seeks to achieve. From the review of the article, it is evident that the authors seek to establish how the drinking patters influence aggressive behavior and dating violence among college students. Based on this, I think the objective of the authors is to establish whether there is a relationship that exists between drinking patterns and dating violence. For this reason, the topic would have been more accurate, clear, and succinct if it was changed to “The Relationship between Drinking Patterns and Dating Violence among College Students”. The topic would have also been appropriate if it were changed to “The Impact of Drinking Patterns on Dating Violence among College Students”. This is because the authors sought to identify how drinking patterns affected aggressive behavior and violence between partners in college. Abstract From the way the abstract is presented, readers are able to get an idea of what the research is all about, which is the objective of the abstract. It is written in a clear language and briefly discusses the objective of the study. The abstract points out that use of alcohol and dating violence as issues that are highly experienced among college students. From this statement, the readers expect to understand the state of affairs on the two variables based on existing research. This is clearly discussed and evident in the literature review of the paper. The abstract also states the study of objective, which involves the examination of the relationship between alcohol use and self-reported antecedents and con.

Running Head PAPER CRITIQUE1PAPER CRITIQUE 5P.docx

glendar3

Critical analysis of research report

Preeti Sood

This document provides guidelines for critically analyzing a research report or study. It defines what is meant by being critical and providing a critical review. It outlines the key aspects of a research study that should be evaluated such as the background, methodology, results, and conclusions. Specific criteria are provided for critiquing different sections of a research report, including the problem statement, objectives, literature review, design, sample, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and conclusions. The purpose of a critical review is to judge the scientific merits and quality of a research study.

PSY 550 Annotated Bibliography Assignment Overview A.docx

aryan532920

PSY 550: Annotated Bibliography Assignment Overview Annotated bibliographies provide you with the opportunity to cite, summarize, and compare and contrast resources you will use in a paper. You will cite each resource in APA style, write an approximately 150-word description that summarizes the central theme and scope of the resource, and compare and contrast it with other resources. For more information on annotated bibliographies, consult the SNHU Writing Center’s annotated bibliography guide. Depending on the assignment, the annotated bibliography may serve a number of purposes, including but not limited to reviewing the literature on a particular subject; illustrating the quality of research you have done; providing examples of the types of resources available; describing other items on a topic that may be of interest to the reader; and/or exploring the subject for further research. The articles should provide sufficient information for you to compare and contrast the two theories. (Source: http://lib.skidmore.edu/library/index.php/writing-an-annotated-bibliography) Choose those works that provide a variety of perspectives on your topic. You will need to include at least seven scholarly resources total, including peer- reviewed journal articles or well-respected texts. As noted below, students should pay attention to the following points in their annotation:  Summarize the central theme and scope of the resource  Include a paragraph that covers the following: o Evaluates the authority or background of the author o Comments on the intended audience o Compares or contrasts this work with another you have cited OR explains how this work illuminates your bibliography topic  Cite the resource using APA style (see below for example) The annotated bibliography is due in Module Seven. You should include at least seven quality resources directly related to your topic. https://my.snhu.edu/CookieAuth.dll?GetLogon?curl=Z2FOfficesZ2FCOCEZ2FWritingCenterZ2FDocumentsZ2FAPAAnnotatedBibliography.pdf&reason=0&formdir=5 http://lib.skidmore.edu/library/index.php/writing-an-annotated-bibliography Sample Annotated Bibliography of a Journal Article The following example is what your final product for each resource should look like. This example (for the psychological research article A Bad Taste in the Mouth: Gustatory Disgust Influences Moral Judgment) employs APA style for the journal citation. The writer of this annotation follows the above points to create an annotation that summarizes the article’s main points and draws connections between that resource and other resources: Eskine, K. J., Kacinik, N. A., & Prinz, J. J. (2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, 22(3), 295–299. Annotation: In this article, Eskine and colleagues describe the results of an experiment that examined whether the taste in a person’s mouth influences the moral judgmen ...

Purpose, Team Formation, and Team Member Roles 10.0 Profession.docx

woodruffeloisa

This paper examines the relationship between the parasympathetic nervous system and touch through lovers' touch, cuddling, and massage. The parasympathetic nervous system is responsible for processes that maintain normal bodily functions like digestion and lowering heart rate. Touch activates the parasympathetic nervous system by stimulating pressure receptors and the vagus nerve, relaxing the body. When activated, the parasympathetic nervous system counters the stress response and produces feelings of calmness. Touch benefits the parasympathetic nervous system by improving self-esteem and reducing stress and anxiety through the release of hormones like dopamine and oxytocin. In summary, activation of the parasympathetic nervous system through touch has significant health benefits.

Writing narrative reviews-Rossella Ferrari

Rossella Ferrari

Research critique

Muthu Venkatachalam

1Grading Rubric for Written Papers HCM340This rubric is ad.docx

aryan532920

1Grading Rubric for Written Papers: HCM340 This rubric is adopted from the Association of American Colleges and Universities LEAP Initiative Strategy: Review the Scholarly Paper Guidelines in the “Resources for all Nursing and Healthcare Professions” document for preparing and writing your paper. Benchmark indicates the minimal level performance expectations. This assignment has 6 critical elements worth up to 2 points each, for a total of 12 points. Rubric Critical Elements Proficient 2 Accomplished 1.7 Benchmark 1.5 Below Benchmark 1 Explanation of Issues Development of a clear focused thesis statement Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated, described, and clarified so that understanding is not seriously impeded by omissions. Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated but description leaves some terms undefined, ambiguities unexplored, boundaries undetermined, and/or backgrounds unknown. Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated without clarification or description. Evidence Selecting and using information to investigate a point of view or conclusion Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are questioned thoroughly. Greater than 85% of the referenced articles are from discipline specific peer-reviewed journals and 15% of sources come from interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journals with synthesis from disciplines evident. Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are subject to questioning, but not well developed. Greater than 20% of references come from discipline specific peer-reviewed journals and 10% of references come from interdisciplinary sources, with enough analysis to develop a coherent consensus. Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are taken as mostly fact, with little questioning. 5-20% of the references come from discipline specific peer-reviewed journals. Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. Viewpoints of experts are taken as fact, without question. Limited sources from peer-reviewed journals less than 5% from specific discipline, and > 5% for interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journals. Influence of Context and Assumptions Demonstrates an understanding of the intended audience. Thoroughly (systematically and methodically) analyzes own (if applicable) and others' assumptions and carefully evaluates the relevance of contexts when presenting a position. Is mindful of the contextual principles of the specific discipline for which the student is enrolled. Identifies own and others' assum ...

Overviews Research Methodology

Ultraman Taro

This document discusses key aspects of research methodology, including defining research, the research process, literature reviews, and evaluating different types of research studies. It outlines the main steps in conducting a literature review, including defining the scope, constructing the review, and integrating themes and identifying gaps. It also provides guidance on evaluating different types of research studies based on their objectives and the types of evidence they can provide.

M3 ch12 discussionConnecting Eligible Immigrant Families to Heal.docx

Literature Review Scoring GuideDue Date End of Unit 6Pe.docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Literature Review Scoring GuideDue Date End of Unit 6Pe.docx

Similar to Literature Review Scoring GuideDue Date End of Unit 6Pe.docx (20)

More from jeremylockett77

More from jeremylockett77 (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Literature Review Scoring GuideDue Date End of Unit 6Pe.docx