This document discusses resource needs for a Plan of Action to improve student learning. It notes that in 2004, 2006, and 2009, the state legislatures of Arkansas, Wyoming, and South Dakota respectively imposed new school funding formulas that included resources from the Plan of Action. The Plan of Action recommends staffing levels, class sizes, instructional materials funding, and other resources based on research. Prototypical school models are provided for estimating staff and funding needs. Additional intervention strategies and central office staff are also accounted for in resource planning.
Presentation by Robert Hassell - Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).
ABSTRACT
Since 2012 all Australian States and territories, and the Federal government, have endorsed an approach to school improvement that was originally developed by the Australian Council for Educational Research in conjunction with the Queensland State Government. While there is an increasing trend towards autonomy of school leadership, all schools in Australia are expected to write a school improvement plan. Rather than focusing purely on desired outcomes, the approach is based on the view that the most effective strategy for improving student achievement in schools is to improve the quality of day-to-day teaching and learning. In this presentation I will outline the research and development underpinning the National School Improvement Tool (ACER, 2012) and its current use for school improvement review and planning that focuses on these important behaviours.
Presentazione di Robert Hassel in occasione del suo intervento al convegno internazionale "Migliorare la scuola", tenutosi a Napoli il 14-15 Maggio 2015 e organizzato dall'Indire.
EDUCATION FOR EDUCATORS IS MOST IMPORTANT FOR DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE EDUCATION SYSTEM.THIS PRESENTATION SHOWS THE CURRENT SCENARIO OF TEACHER EDUCATION IN INDIA.
3. in summary...
The following states as
noted in Chapter 2 are
willing to boost funding
based on the Plan of
Action...
4. Legislature is needed
2004- Arkansas legislature imposed a new school
funding formula to include all resources for
comprehensive professional development
2006- Wyoming legislature imposed a new school
funding formula to include all resources in the Plan of
Action from Chapter 1
2009- South Dakota imposed a new school funding
formula that includes bulk of resources from Chapter 1’s
Plan of Action
8. State legislature is willing
to...
fatten up funding based on the
Plan of Action which is designed to
significantly improve student learning
all of this is dependent on specifying
the resource needs of that plan-not all
school systems are created equal
10. http://www.lpicus.com
Allan Odden suggests the finance adequacy
school studies of Lawrence O. Picus and
Associates have helped to develop strategies
that have been researched with favorable
evidence as it relates to resource needs for a
Plan of Action (Let’s take a look at some case
studies..)
The suggestions offer a look at strategic
resourcing allocations.
11. Core Recommendations Formula-
based on Table 2.1
Full day kindergarten
Regular class sizes of 15 students K-3 & Class
sizes of 25 students 4-12
Specialist teachers-art/music/physical ed./career
tech with numbers adequate to cover:
6 period day in middle schools
5 period day for high schools
4-90 minute block periods in high schools with
teachers teaching 3 blocks per day
12. Core Recommendations Formula-
based on Table 2.1-continued...
at least one planning period (45-60 mins.) [Chptr.
3 will talk about collaboration time.]
student support staff
1 guidance counselor/250 students (middle
and high schools)
1 nurse in every elementary school
1 position for every 100 at risk students in an
elementary school that is a social worker and
family liaison
13. Core Recommendations Formula-
based on Table 2.1-continued...
a full-time librarian
a full-time principal + 2 secretaries in prototypical
setting:
elementary school- 432 students
middle school- 450 students
high school- 600 students
sometimes an additional AP in HS
14. Core Recommendations Formula-
based on Table 2.1-continued...
1 instructional coach per 200 students
at least 10 staff development days additional
to the 180 teacher school year-extended
teacher school year
$100/student for professional development
divided amongst core and elective teachers to
work collaboratively for 45-60 minutes per day
supervisory aides to cover recess, lunch, hall
monitoring, bus loading and unloading
15. Core Recommendations Formula-
based on Table 2.1-continued...
MONEY
$175/student for instructional materials,
formative assessments and supplies
$250/student for technology and equipment
$250/student for activities (sports, clubs, etc.)
GIFTED & TALENTED-$25/STUDENT
16. Core Recommendations Formula-
based on Table 2.1-continued...
TIER 2 intervention strategies to help students
with additional instructional time and assistance
to help meet state proficiency standards
1:1 tutoring
8-9 week summer camp
summer school resources
ELL teacher/100 students
1 teacher + .05 aid position for every 150
students with mild-moderate disabilities
17. Core Recommendations Formula-
based on Table 2.1-continued...
Substitute teacher for each teacher for
10 days
Central office staff
covering...superintendent, business
office, curriculum and student support,
technology and maintenance director
figure for prototypical 3,500 students
Food
services/Transportation/Maintenance
18. Resources needed for
Plan of Action
• This is evidence and best-practice-based
starting points
• Solid place to begin deliberations
• Helps to frame strategic budgeting exercises
19. Back to the beginning...
• Arkansas and Wyoming tweaked the
formula to what they felt best for their needs
as it related to staffing and student needs.
Arkansas-data was used to implement a
new nationwide foundation expenditure
level
Wyoming-incorporated school based
staffing allocations into the formula based
on size of school/district
20. Wrapping it up nationwide
Odden states, “...if the country took a more
national perspective of how it would fund its
schools-like it is taking with adopting Common
Math and Reading Standards and the
understanding that good education is key to
the country’s economic health-it would not
have to provide much more funding to ensure
an adequate level of resources in all schools
(p.41).”
21. on a final note
• Connecticut, New Hampshire, New
Jersey and New York provide resources
above recommendations=strategic cuts
would not impact students’ performance
Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida,
Georgia, Mississippi, Tennessee, Texas
and Utah provide resources below
recommendations=strategic cuts will be
discussed in the following chapters.......