Kindly find this paper useful in all fields, you can as well share the resource with friends in all learning institutions. This is entirely the my original work. The paper will also be useful in fields like medicine, law and social science.
Naturalistic World view, Modern Biblical Interpretation, De-mythologizing the text, higher criticism, Critical Literary Theory, Case study: Sharon Brous," Awakening the Scream", Ikar. Modern Messianic Biblical Interpretation, Case Study: Jonathan Bernis, "The Lost Tribes".
The Christian Self Series, Part III - The Will and Desirecumcsl
The mp3 of this lesson is available at www.cumcsl.org/axiomlessons. If you want to hear the lessons in person, join us on Sundays at 9:45 am in Room 312 at Christ United Methodist Church in Sugar Land, Texas.
Naturalistic World view, Modern Biblical Interpretation, De-mythologizing the text, higher criticism, Critical Literary Theory, Case study: Sharon Brous," Awakening the Scream", Ikar. Modern Messianic Biblical Interpretation, Case Study: Jonathan Bernis, "The Lost Tribes".
The Christian Self Series, Part III - The Will and Desirecumcsl
The mp3 of this lesson is available at www.cumcsl.org/axiomlessons. If you want to hear the lessons in person, join us on Sundays at 9:45 am in Room 312 at Christ United Methodist Church in Sugar Land, Texas.
Science & Religion: Conflict or Conversation?Maya Bohnhoff
Is religion opposed to science? Has science made religion intellectually implausible? Does science rule out the existence of a “personal” God? What does "personal" mean? Does evolution do away with Divine Providence?Haven’t recent biological and neurological discoveries made illusions of the concepts of soul or spirit?
These are all questions that I've fielded from correspondents for some time. They're good questions because they call on people who hold to diverse models of the universe to do a reality check.
Philosophical presentation about existence of God and against the existence of God,Problem of Evil,teleological argument,Empirical argument,North South University,God,Monotheist,Islam,Hinduism,Christianity,
Dr. John Oakes taught a class titled Christianity and Bioethics at the 2013 ICEC at San Diego State University. The class includes a discussion of the various technologies which we can assume will be coming in the fairly near future. John proposes the kinds of technologies Christians should embrace and those which they should consider opposing. Compassion, the desire to relieve suffering and the concept of responsible spiritual stewardship can guide wise choices, while the push to enhance human abilities beyond the “natural” present problems.
Dr. John Oakes taught a class on Modernism and Scientific Materialism at the 2015 International Christan Evidence Conference at York College in York, Nebraska, June 19-21. He gave a brief overview of the history of modern science and then give a world view critique of the philosophy, comparing it to Christianity. Here are notes and power points from the presentation.
This presentation is an introduction to the issue of ethics and morality and examines the possible sources of a standard and an authority for morality.
DIRECTIONS What do the four parts of the Christian Biblical Na.docxlynettearnold46882
DIRECTIONS
What do the four parts of the Christian Biblical Narrative (i.e., creation, fall, redemption, and restoration) say about the nature of God and of reality in relation to the reality of sickness and disease? From where would one find comfort and hope in the light of illness according to this narrative? Explain in detail each part of the narrative above and analyze the implications.
Biomedical Ethics in The Christian Narrative
Introduction
The reality of religious pluralism (the view that there are many different religions with different teachings) does not logically imply any sort of religious relativism (the view that there is no such thing as truth, or that everything is a matter of opinion). There are genuine distinctions between religions and worldviews. Given this fact, it is imperative that one be tolerant of differences and engage civilly with those of different religions or worldviews. It might be tempting to think that one is being tolerant or civil by simply rolling all religions into one sort of generic "spirituality" and to claim that all religions are essentially the same. But this is simply false. Once again, there are genuine and important differences among religions; these differences are meaningful to the followers of a particular faith. To simply talk of some sort of a generic "spirituality," while maybe properly descriptive of some, does not accurately describe most of the religious people in the world. Furthermore, this terminology often reduces religion to a mere personal or cultural preference, and it ignores the distinctions and particularity of each. The point is that such a reductionism is not respectful of patients. It should also be noted that atheism or secularism are not simply default or perfectly objective (or supposedly scientific) starting positions, while religious perspectives are somehow hopelessly biased. Every religion or worldview brings with it a set of assumptions about the nature of reality; whether or not a particular view should be favored depends upon whether or not it is considered true and explains well one's experience of reality.
Biomedical Ethics
Bioethics is a subfield of ethics that concerns the ethics of medicine and ethical issues in the life sciences raised by the advance of technology. The issues dealt with tend to be complex and controversial (i.e., abortion, stem cell research, euthanasia, etc.). In addition, bieothics usually also involves questions of public policy and social justice. As such, the complexities of bioethical discussion in a pluralistic society are compounded. There have been several different approaches to bioethical questions put forth that have to do with the theory behind ethical decision making. Three positions have been prominent in the discussion principalism (also known as the four principle approach), virtue ethics, and casuistry. For this lecture, it will be useful to outline principalism and to describe the general contours of a Christian app.
Science & Religion: Conflict or Conversation?Maya Bohnhoff
Is religion opposed to science? Has science made religion intellectually implausible? Does science rule out the existence of a “personal” God? What does "personal" mean? Does evolution do away with Divine Providence?Haven’t recent biological and neurological discoveries made illusions of the concepts of soul or spirit?
These are all questions that I've fielded from correspondents for some time. They're good questions because they call on people who hold to diverse models of the universe to do a reality check.
Philosophical presentation about existence of God and against the existence of God,Problem of Evil,teleological argument,Empirical argument,North South University,God,Monotheist,Islam,Hinduism,Christianity,
Dr. John Oakes taught a class titled Christianity and Bioethics at the 2013 ICEC at San Diego State University. The class includes a discussion of the various technologies which we can assume will be coming in the fairly near future. John proposes the kinds of technologies Christians should embrace and those which they should consider opposing. Compassion, the desire to relieve suffering and the concept of responsible spiritual stewardship can guide wise choices, while the push to enhance human abilities beyond the “natural” present problems.
Dr. John Oakes taught a class on Modernism and Scientific Materialism at the 2015 International Christan Evidence Conference at York College in York, Nebraska, June 19-21. He gave a brief overview of the history of modern science and then give a world view critique of the philosophy, comparing it to Christianity. Here are notes and power points from the presentation.
This presentation is an introduction to the issue of ethics and morality and examines the possible sources of a standard and an authority for morality.
DIRECTIONS What do the four parts of the Christian Biblical Na.docxlynettearnold46882
DIRECTIONS
What do the four parts of the Christian Biblical Narrative (i.e., creation, fall, redemption, and restoration) say about the nature of God and of reality in relation to the reality of sickness and disease? From where would one find comfort and hope in the light of illness according to this narrative? Explain in detail each part of the narrative above and analyze the implications.
Biomedical Ethics in The Christian Narrative
Introduction
The reality of religious pluralism (the view that there are many different religions with different teachings) does not logically imply any sort of religious relativism (the view that there is no such thing as truth, or that everything is a matter of opinion). There are genuine distinctions between religions and worldviews. Given this fact, it is imperative that one be tolerant of differences and engage civilly with those of different religions or worldviews. It might be tempting to think that one is being tolerant or civil by simply rolling all religions into one sort of generic "spirituality" and to claim that all religions are essentially the same. But this is simply false. Once again, there are genuine and important differences among religions; these differences are meaningful to the followers of a particular faith. To simply talk of some sort of a generic "spirituality," while maybe properly descriptive of some, does not accurately describe most of the religious people in the world. Furthermore, this terminology often reduces religion to a mere personal or cultural preference, and it ignores the distinctions and particularity of each. The point is that such a reductionism is not respectful of patients. It should also be noted that atheism or secularism are not simply default or perfectly objective (or supposedly scientific) starting positions, while religious perspectives are somehow hopelessly biased. Every religion or worldview brings with it a set of assumptions about the nature of reality; whether or not a particular view should be favored depends upon whether or not it is considered true and explains well one's experience of reality.
Biomedical Ethics
Bioethics is a subfield of ethics that concerns the ethics of medicine and ethical issues in the life sciences raised by the advance of technology. The issues dealt with tend to be complex and controversial (i.e., abortion, stem cell research, euthanasia, etc.). In addition, bieothics usually also involves questions of public policy and social justice. As such, the complexities of bioethical discussion in a pluralistic society are compounded. There have been several different approaches to bioethical questions put forth that have to do with the theory behind ethical decision making. Three positions have been prominent in the discussion principalism (also known as the four principle approach), virtue ethics, and casuistry. For this lecture, it will be useful to outline principalism and to describe the general contours of a Christian app.
Introduction the Development of PhilosophySocrates ( the unexamTatianaMajor22
Introduction the Development of Philosophy
Socrates ( "the unexamined life is not worth living"
Demonstrate knowledge on:
What is Philosophy?
The noun philosophy means the study of proper behavior, and the search for wisdom. The original meaning of the word philosophy comes from the Greek roots philo-meaning "love" and -sophos, or "wisdom." ... In other words, they want to know the meaning of life.
Watch Video: What is Philosophy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRG-rV8hhpU
What is Ethics?
Ethics or moral philosophy is a branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct. ... Ethics seeks to resolve questions of human morality by defining concepts such as good and evil, right and wrong, virtue and vice, justice and crime.
View Video: What is Ethics https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_t4obUc51A
4,200 religions
According to some estimates, there are roughly 4,200 religions in the world. The word religion is sometimes used interchangeably with "faith" or "belief system", but religion differs from private belief in that it has a public aspect.
List of Religions and Spiritual Traditions -
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › List_of_religions_and_spiritual_traditions
Forms of Religious Belief : Monotheism, Atheism, Polytheism, Agnostic
A. Monotheism The term monotheism comes from the Greek monos, (one) and theos (god). Thus, monotheism is the belief in the existence of a single god.
B. Polytheism which is a belief in many gods
C. Atheism An atheist doesn't believe in a god or divine being. ...
D. Agnostic an agnostic neither believes nor disbelieves in a god or religious doctrine. Agnostics assert that it's impossible for human beings to know anything about how the universe was created and if divine beings exist. They are open to the possibility of a divine being an atheist is not open to such a possibility.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Two Types of Religions/Historical and Mythological Religions
Mythological Religion Mythology is the main component of Religion. It refers to systems of legends and stories and concepts that are of high importance to a certain community, making statements concerning the supernatural or sacred. Religion is the broader term, besides mythological system, it includes ritual. A given mythology is almost always associated with a certain religion such as Greek mythology with Ancient Greek religion. Disconnected from its religious system, a myth may lose its immediate relevance to the community and evolve—away from sacred importance—into a legend or folktale.
Historical Religions can be traced back in history to actual people, places and events which are documented in history and archeology. Information about the teachings and life situation of Jesus, Mohammed, Moses, The Jewish Prophets can be found in historical records.
Religious Theory Philosophy( Ethics based on a Religious teaching) Religious philosophy is ...
Relationship Between Science And Religion
Science Vs Religion Research Paper
Science Vs Religion
Religion In Science Vs Religion
Science Vs Religion Research Paper
Research Paper On Science Vs Religion
Religion vs. Science
Evidence Based Science Vs Religion
Relationship Between Science And Religion
Essay on Science vs God
Religion vs. Science Essays
Religion vs. Science Essay
Science and Religion Essays
Science Vs Religion Research Paper
Religion vs. Science
The Nature Of Science Vs. Religion
Scientism Vs Religion Research Paper
Essay on Science vs. Religion
Cosmology: Science Vs Religion Essay
The author examines available evidence to examine the question of "Are we alone?", i.e., whether humans are the only intelligent species in the Milky Way, or if the galaxy is teeming with advanced civilizations. The author discusses barriers to physical contact with extra-terrestrial beings and addresses Fermi's paradox "Where is everybody?" using the Drake Equation. The final answer is surprising, disturbing, and inspirational all at the same time. The appendix analyzes the strategy of the SETI project from and engineer's point of view, and offers some advice to maximize the chances of finding alien civilizations who may be transmitting beacon signals to announce their presence: Look for them in the Andromeda galaxy.
Toward the end of the Renaissance, the modern method ofempir.docxturveycharlyn
Toward the end of the Renaissance, the modern method of
empirical science began to develop. The key players were
Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543), Johannes Kepler (1571-
1630), and Galileo Galilei (1564-1642). Although it may
seem ironic now, each of these men believed in the Christian
God. They viewed science as studying the handiwork of an
almighty Creator and discerning His natural laws. Galileo
considered God to have written two “books”: the Bible and
nature (Hummel, p. 106).
Contrary to popular belief, the cause for the diversion
between Christianity and science originated not with the
Church but with the university professors who were threat-
ened by Galileo’s revolutionary ideas. These professors were
steeped in the Greek scientific method, which included
observation to a small extent, but mostly explained the
workings of nature through rational deduction from first
principles, or assumptions, an entire view of the universe had
been built up. Consequently, the professors embraced such
misconceptions as the sun having no imperfections, the moon
being a perfectly smooth sphere that shone with its own light,
and the earth alone having a moon since the earth was at the
center of the universe. Galileo’s recently invented telescope
quickly demonstrated the incorrectness of such assumptions
(Hummel, pp. 91-94).
Not willing to be thwarted by Galileo, the professors decided
to make the controversy religious rather than academic
(Hummel, p. 92). They argued that the heliocentric (sun-cen-
tered) view contradicted scripture (e.g., Psalm 104:22 says,
“The sun rises.” Therefore, the sun must revolve around sta-
tionary earth). In the face of what at that time appeared to be
a genuine contradiction between scripture and the heliocen-
tric theory, the theologians of the Roman Catholic Church
had no choice but to condemn Galileo’s views, because the
conflict had challenged the authority of the Church.
As a result of that controversy, the schism between reason
and faith had begun. There were now two apparently
irreconcilable sources of truth: the church and science.
Secularism
A Religion Profile from International Students, Inc.
1
Secularism: An Overview
Number of Adherents
Demographer Davit Barrett estimates that there are 150 million
atheists and 768 million nonreligious people in the world. The
combined total comes to more than 918 million people (Barrett).
Secularism Among the Nations
In more than 40 countries, atheists or nonreligious make up
more than 10 percent of the population (World Christian
Database). The following are just a few of those countries:
Austrailia, Britain, Canada, China, Cuba, Czech Republic,
France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, North Korea,
Mongolia, Netherlands, New Zealand, Russia, Sweden,
Uruguay and Vietnam.
Defining the Terms
An “atheist” is one who says there is sufficient evidence to
show that God does not exist. An “agnostic” is one who says
there is insufficient evidence to know wheth ...
Creationism Vs Evolution
Creationism Essay
Creationism vs. Evolution Essay
Essay on Evolution VS. Creationism
Evolution Vs. Creationism Essay
Creationism vs. Evolution Essay
Young Earth Creationism
Creationism vs. Evolution Essay
Evolution vs. Creationism Essay
Creationism Vs Creationism
Reflection On Creationism
Creationism
Kindly find this paper useful in all fields, you can as well share the resource with friends in all learning institutions. This is entirely the my original work. The paper will also be useful in fields like medicine, law and social science.
Kindly find this paper useful in all fields, you can as well share the resource with friends in all learning institutions. This is entirely the my original work. The paper will also be useful in fields like medicine, law and social science.
Kindly find this paper useful in all fields, you can as well share the resource with friends in all learning institutions. This is entirely the my original work. The paper will also be useful in fields like medicine, law and social science.
Kindly find this paper useful in all fields, you can as well share the resource with friends in all learning institutions. This is entirely the my original work. The paper will also be useful in fields like medicine, law and social science.
Kindly find this paper useful in all fields, you can as well share the resource with friends in all learning institutions. This is entirely the my original work. The paper will also be useful in fields like medicine, law and social science.
Kindly find this paper useful in all fields, you can as well share the resource with friends in all learning institutions. This is entirely the my original work. The paper will also be useful in fields like medicine, law and social science.
Kindly find this paper useful in all fields, you can as well share the resource with friends in all learning institutions. This is entirely the my original work. The paper will also be useful in fields like medicine, law and social science.
Kindly find this paper useful in all fields, you can as well share the resource with friends in all learning institutions. This is entirely the my original work. The paper will also be useful in fields like medicine, law and social science.
Kindly find this paper useful in all fields, you can as well share the resource with friends in all learning institutions. This is entirely the my original work. The paper will also be useful in fields like medicine, law and social science.
Kindly find this paper useful in all fields, you can as well share the resource with friends in all learning institutions. This is entirely the my original work. The paper will also be useful in fields like medicine, law and social science.
Kindly find this paper useful in all fields, you can as well share the resource with friends in all learning institutions. This is entirely the my original work. The paper will also be useful in fields like medicine, law and social science.
Kindly find this paper useful in all fields, you can as well share the resource with friends in all learning institutions. This is entirely the my original work. The paper will also be useful in fields like medicine, law and social science.
Kindly find this paper useful in all fields, you can as well share the resource with friends in all learning institutions. This is entirely the my original work. The paper will also be useful in fields like medicine, law and social science.
Kindly find this paper useful in all fields, you can as well share the resource with friends in all learning institutions. This is entirely the my original work. The paper will also be useful in fields like medicine, law and social science.
Move from industrial to employment relations revisedmusyokasaff
Kindly find this paper useful in all fields, you can as well share the resource with friends in all learning institutions. This is entirely the my original work. The paper will also be useful in fields like medicine, law and social science.
Kindly find this paper useful in all fields, you can as well share the resource with friends in all learning institutions. This is entirely the my original work. The paper will also be useful in fields like medicine, law and social science.
Contemporary issue in human resource management revisedmusyokasaff
Kindly find this paper useful in all fields, you can as well share the resource with friends in all learning institutions. This is entirely the my original work. The paper will also be useful in fields like medicine, law and social science.
Empowering ACOs: Leveraging Quality Management Tools for MIPS and BeyondHealth Catalyst
Join us as we delve into the crucial realm of quality reporting for MSSP (Medicare Shared Savings Program) Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs).
In this session, we will explore how a robust quality management solution can empower your organization to meet regulatory requirements and improve processes for MIPS reporting and internal quality programs. Learn how our MeasureAble application enables compliance and fosters continuous improvement.
The dimensions of healthcare quality refer to various attributes or aspects that define the standard of healthcare services. These dimensions are used to evaluate, measure, and improve the quality of care provided to patients. A comprehensive understanding of these dimensions ensures that healthcare systems can address various aspects of patient care effectively and holistically. Dimensions of Healthcare Quality and Performance of care include the following; Appropriateness, Availability, Competence, Continuity, Effectiveness, Efficiency, Efficacy, Prevention, Respect and Care, Safety as well as Timeliness.
Antibiotic Stewardship by Anushri Srivastava.pptxAnushriSrivastav
Stewardship is the act of taking good care of something.
Antimicrobial stewardship is a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials (including antibiotics), improves patient outcomes, reduces microbial resistance, and decreases the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.
WHO launched the Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) in 2015 to fill knowledge gaps and inform strategies at all levels.
ACCORDING TO apic.org,
Antimicrobial stewardship is a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials (including antibiotics), improves patient outcomes, reduces microbial resistance, and decreases the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.
ACCORDING TO pewtrusts.org,
Antibiotic stewardship refers to efforts in doctors’ offices, hospitals, long term care facilities, and other health care settings to ensure that antibiotics are used only when necessary and appropriate
According to WHO,
Antimicrobial stewardship is a systematic approach to educate and support health care professionals to follow evidence-based guidelines for prescribing and administering antimicrobials
In 1996, John McGowan and Dale Gerding first applied the term antimicrobial stewardship, where they suggested a causal association between antimicrobial agent use and resistance. They also focused on the urgency of large-scale controlled trials of antimicrobial-use regulation employing sophisticated epidemiologic methods, molecular typing, and precise resistance mechanism analysis.
Antimicrobial Stewardship(AMS) refers to the optimal selection, dosing, and duration of antimicrobial treatment resulting in the best clinical outcome with minimal side effects to the patients and minimal impact on subsequent resistance.
According to the 2019 report, in the US, more than 2.8 million antibiotic-resistant infections occur each year, and more than 35000 people die. In addition to this, it also mentioned that 223,900 cases of Clostridoides difficile occurred in 2017, of which 12800 people died. The report did not include viruses or parasites
VISION
Being proactive
Supporting optimal animal and human health
Exploring ways to reduce overall use of antimicrobials
Using the drugs that prevent and treat disease by killing microscopic organisms in a responsible way
GOAL
to prevent the generation and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Doing so will preserve the effectiveness of these drugs in animals and humans for years to come.
being to preserve human and animal health and the effectiveness of antimicrobial medications.
to implement a multidisciplinary approach in assembling a stewardship team to include an infectious disease physician, a clinical pharmacist with infectious diseases training, infection preventionist, and a close collaboration with the staff in the clinical microbiology laboratory
to prevent antimicrobial overuse, misuse and abuse.
to minimize the developme
Health Education on prevention of hypertensionRadhika kulvi
Hypertension is a chronic condition of concern due to its role in the causation of coronary heart diseases. Hypertension is a worldwide epidemic and important risk factor for coronary artery disease, stroke and renal diseases. Blood pressure is the force exerted by the blood against the walls of the blood vessels and is sufficient to maintain tissue perfusion during activity and rest. Hypertension is sustained elevation of BP. In adults, HTN exists when systolic blood pressure is equal to or greater than 140mmHg or diastolic BP is equal to or greater than 90mmHg. The
The Importance of Community Nursing Care.pdfAD Healthcare
NDIS and Community 24/7 Nursing Care is a specific type of support that may be provided under the NDIS for individuals with complex medical needs who require ongoing nursing care in a community setting, such as their home or a supported accommodation facility.
1. [Surname] 1
Student Name
Professor Name
Course Name
Date
Life and Death
Introduction
This research thesis focuses mainly on exploring life or death, heaven or earth and good or
evil highlighting the different understandings of human origin. Different cultures have various
myths concerning the origin of death where in other cultures; seen to be a universal character to
human existence and thus the foundation of destruction is global (Green, 156). There exist
numerous myths on the origin of death and in Christianity; the source of death begins with an
existence of a particular apple-tree that lived on the Garden of Eden.
Good and Evil
The term "good and evil" is common among different religious groups with the term evil
perceived as being the dual antagonist of good where good deeds should surpass evil (Ingram,
148). The term "good" generally applies to studies of ethics, religion, and morals. Similarly, the
term refers to that which the society consider as useful and beneficial to the organization. The first
contributors to the word were Plato and Aristotle who preceded with the discussion. However,
apart from the Greeks, Plato and Aristotle, the idea was further applied in religious context and
resulted in emergent of sects who believed in embracing certain dual beliefs claiming the material
2. [Surname] 2
life to be shunned whereas the spiritual life to be fully embraced. In Buddhist cultures, with
increased spiritual influence, both terms consider as a part of aggressive duality defeated by a
Buddhist prophet to achieve oneness (Ingram). The concept of evil is rather broad but it is the
direct opposite of what consider as good and many at times the term denotes immorality.
In religious view, the term evil considers as supernatural forces. However, in Christianity,
the term evil denotes as any action or mind thought that is directly opposite to God's character and
will. Shreds of evidence of these are highlighted in both the Old and the New Testament. However,
the Bible emphasizes principals concerning God and evil in the developed world (Roby, 114). By
the Old Testament, sin denotes as understandings of rebellion to God and Satan's fall of Angels
(Tilley, 659). Evil exists in four kinds that include instrumental, demonic, ignorant, and idealistic
forms. Therefore, the wicked is a form that one perceives and usually not found in reality whereas
the instrumental form mainly applies as means of reaching a particular goal. However, the
idealistic structure includes deeds committed to acceptance of what is right.
The notion that people are somehow good and other evil is widely applied while some
researchers argue that sin is dependent on free will. Therefore, for individuals with moral tasks,
there are faced with choosing if to commit evil activities. In Christian context, individuals are born
with sin which can be cleansed through spiritual baptism. It is essential to take into account at least
two concepts of evil including the broad and narrow perspectives to avoid confusion. The general
view is inclusive of bad relations, character flaw, and wrong actions. Similarly, moral evil is seen
to result from negligence whereas, in the narrow concept, evil selects only the most ethical
character. Many at times, the theory of wrongdoing connects mainly with supernatural forces and
creatures inhibiting powers thought to be arising from the kingdom of evil.
3. [Surname] 3
Other researchers responded to the concept of supernatural as a non-spiritual good notion
of evil being distinctively different from religious ideas and the secular idea of sin widely used in
political contexts (James, n.p.). Similarly, other individuals believe that if they can provide a
reasonable analysis of the concept of sin that fails to refer to the process as being supernatural.
Life and Death
Many communities fail to believe in deaths who usually consider the process as a surprise
and an accident. Others consider natural death as a spiritual process, and the communities have no
proper understanding of death as an avoidable. However, mythologies on the origin of death exist
in several categories while in other cities; men subjected to mortality mainly arise due to
infringement of specific taboos.
Similarly, other communities consider the origin of death as being a result of sin omission
that should not be confused with a commission. At many occasions, the theory of death is said to
result in consequences for first victims from an intelligent supernatural being. Therefore, death is
believed to arise by an agreed covenant between the living dead and the gods. Many communities
thus consider the origin as a penalty for disobeying a command. The most critical myth about the
origin of death is the Greek conceptualization considered as the breaking point of prohibition. One
Greek myth regards death as punishment due to engaging in forbidden activities. However, the
tale exempts men from death prior the disagreement between the Prometheus and Zeus.
Heaven and Earth
In religion, the term "heaven" is widely used to refer to places where saints, angles, gods
and the living dead are said to live after death. Other religions have several Heavens, in essence,
4. [Surname] 4
Buddhism, and they consider as part of illusionary realism. The belief suggests that those who
acquire a better karma may be reborn and the stay of those in heaven fail to acknowledge as eternal
since they will utilize all the good karma and be reborn in another life. In comparison to other
religions, heavenly beings are said to descend on earth and heaven is considered a holy place. As
per the Buddhist religion, all living things migrate through several "planes" and regard the human
world as an example of one realm. The consideration of earth as a different realm is a traditional
vision with Heavenly bodies being existent of the human kingdom, and other empires of animals
exist after the human one.
In the Christian religion, Heaven means the site where the throne of God exists together
with his angels. However, in ancient Christianity, heaven implies a state of supreme existence of
Godhead through the beatific vision and in most religions; it considers as the location of converted
dead. When Jesus resurrected, he ascended into heaven where he sat at the Right Hand of God as
he plans the second coming into earth.
Criticism
Major criticisms of the belief of heaven argue that the heavenly bodies reward after death
diminishes one's motivation of morality and ethics when one is currently alive. As per the
Anarchist Goldman, he exclaimed that most researchers see heaven, earth, right and evil as a
weapon of luring individuals into obedience and contentment. Other theorists consider the theory
of the universe as originating from the atmosphere with all significant earth's historical past
attributed to actions and outcomes of comet action. People do not commit evil activities willingly,
but they engage such deeds due to cognitive issues and childhood experiences.
5. [Surname] 5
Real differences on the idea of "good and evil" are a failure of fixing empathy where the
individual is with cognitive personality being unable to develop understanding. The concept of
good is realized through processes of restoring justice rather than sending ‘bad' people to jail.
Unlike the consistent prisoning of ‘bad' people in the society, the therapeutic process instead gives
lawbreakers another opportunity to deal with their past deeds has excellent potential for
rehabilitation. Other researchers suggest that individuals should disregard the notion of evil since
it lacks adequate explanation and thus seizes to be an appropriate concept (Cole, n.p). However,
the idea of evil having explanatory powers explains reasons as to why specific activities performed.
Similarly, the theory of sin fails to elaborate the performance process since it considers as a
contemptuous classification (Hochberg, 79-113).
Several critics claim that we should overrule concepts of evil since of its harm and
potentially dangerous use (Cole, 21). Additionally, others trust that the idea of sin needs revival
due to its relevance to character, events and ethical significance. The categorizing of activities as
either good or evil helps individuals focus attention on limited assets.
6. [Surname] 6
Works Cited
Cole, Phillip. "The Enemy Within." The Myth of Evil, 2006, pp. 95-121.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/concept-evil/
James W. Green, Beyond the Good Death: The Anthropology of Modern Dying, University of
Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2008, 304 pp., ISBN 13: 978 0 8122 4042
9 Ageing and Society, vol. 29, no. 01, 2008, pp. 156-157.
https://www.amazon.com/Beyond-Good-Death-Anthropology-Modern/dp/0812221982
Hochberg, Severin. "Reading the Holocaust, by Inga ClendinnenReading the Holocaust, by Inga
Clendinnen. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1999. x, 227 pp. $54.95 U.S. (cloth),
$14.95 U.S. (paper)." Canadian Journal of History, vol. 36, no. 3, 2001, pp. 567-568.
Roby, Mary L. "God, Power, and Evil: A Process Theodicy. By Griffin David Ray. Philadelphia:
The Westminster Press, 1976. 336 pages. $17.50." Horizons, vol. 5, no. 01, 1978, p. 114.
https://www.amazon.com/God-Power-Evil-Process-Theodicy/dp/0664229069
Tilley, Terrence W. "Evil: A Historical and Theological Perspective. Hans Schwarz, Mark W.
Worthing." The Journal of Religion, vol. 76, no. 4, 1996, pp. 659-660.
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/489891