Creationism Essay

Creationism Vs Evolution
In order to teach about the earliest man in a nonbiased way, I believe that public schools should
not shelter students from either side. It would be a bit unfair to only show one side of the subject
matter. I think it would be good to expose students to a perspective they're not used to; they would
be able to have even more knowledge on evolution and creationism. It's a very debatable topic, but
students should understand that neither standpoint can be considered factually correct. Teaching
both topics as theories would be the ideal way to approach it. A majority of Americans are not
familiar with Creationism, which is why I think it would be practical to teach both theories. On the
other hand, evolution is a concept that many people are familiar
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Creationism Essay
In a typical American high school, Mr. Doe, the science teacher begins his discussion on the
theory of evolution. John, a student opposes the idea the humans came from apes and evolved.
John believes that men came from God and that man was created in 6 days. Jane hears this and
argues against John, "How could anything possibly be created in 6 days? This sort of project
would take millions of years!" By using up all 45 minutes of class time discussing creationism and
evolution, this is a metaphor to the eternal debate as to the origin of the human species. The question
of how man came into existence is one of the great debates of this century. There is not enough
evidence to support creationism, yet there is even less to support...show more content...
Maybe it was that the egg was conceived and gradually came about through carbon molecules
millions of years ago. Perhaps, the egg just suddenly appeared! This metaphor of the egg and the
chicken does not have an answer just as the question of how humans originated. Only "destiny waits
our answer. The choice is ours" (Graham 2).
The theory of evolution is still a theory, yet some believe it to be fact. First introduced in 1858,
Charles Darwin, the "father of evolution" introduced the idea that a species changes through
inherited characteristics over a period of time (Evolution 1128). During the early 19th century is
when this "threat to religion began to circulate" (Marlantes 1). Gradual change is what evolution
is about, no sudden event could occur. Some may wonder, "if the Creator uses physics and
chemistry to run the universe of life, why wouldn't He have used physics and chemistry to
produce it, too" (Marlantes 2). Though evolution is one of gradual change, it is sporadic in those
changes, whereas creationism is based on a design rather than chance (Seely 6). Evidence proves
that man has the power to redefine the boundaries while on the contrary, other species are trapped
by their biological nature in their way of life (Sabath 1). Darwin and his theory are the
beginnings of the pre–evolutionary trend toward natural philosophy. There is hard evidence, fossils
that prove that we came from something. Some people look towards "science

Creationism vs. Evolution Essay
Since the Age of the Enlightenment, the institution of religion has had to contend with the
opposition of science regarding the issues of the origins of the world and of the human species. Up
until around the end of the 17th century, the church was the authority on how the world and
everything in it had come to be. However, with the great intellectual revolution came thinkers such
as Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and many others who challenged the biblical assumptions
with empirically deduced scientific theories. The Catholic Church had a nasty habit of persecuting
such ideological dissent toward creationism, calling it heresy and thereby somewhat suppressing a
complete upheaval of the Scriptures. For many centuries to come,...show more content...
The representatives of the ACLU were willing to defend any person willing to face trial for
teaching the subject in schools in order to contest the law and bring its nature into the national
limelight. The town leaders of Dayton obliged, being glad for the opportunity of some publicity.
William Jennings Bryan represented the State of Tennessee and staked his claim saying that the State
of Tennessee "has already held that this act is constitutional, it being the law of the land, there is but
one issue before this court and jury, and that is, did the defendant violate the statute" (Bryan). Bryan
felt that the defense had no case because the trial was not to debate the constitutionality of a law, but
to prove that said law was broken. The prosecution discovered that they needed to argue the
irrationality of teaching evolution and claimed that it was only a mysterious theory and could not
possibly have expert testimonies. The prosecution also argued that because science was the enabler
of modern warfare, it was also a source of evil; evil should not be taught in schools. Bryan said that
no teacher had the right either, to cause ideological conflict within the home by influencing a child
with theories contrary to their parentally instilled religious background

Essay on Evolution VS. Creationism
Since the beginning of the human race there has been a lingering question as to the origins of man
and how all living things acquired their characteristics. The two main theories that arose over time
were Creationism and Evolution, both of which provided very distinct answers to this question.
Creationism based its answer on the idea of a supernatural power or being that created the entire
universe, man and the numerous other organisms that live within it. While, Evolution theorizes that
all living things have the potential to change and grow over time into something new and different.
So in other words, one theory suggests that humans and all the organisms on Earth are the result of
divine design, while the other indicates that they...show more content...
Every one of these flaws points out that the Creationists theory that the Earth, all of the organisms on
it, and everything that surrounds it has not changed or been altered since the flood is inaccurate.
Biogeography for example shows that "closely allied" species have a tendency to live on the "same
continent... or within the same group of oceanic islands... despite their species–by–species
preferences for different habitats, food source, [and] of conditions of climate" (Quammen 4). The
explanation for this is that "they descended from common ancestors" and this can be verified with
the paleontology flaw because that flaw deals with the fossils of plants and animals "that had
[either] become extinct or that still existed but in different forms" which indicates not only that
organisms have changed over time, but also provides evidence that "closely allied" organism have
lived in the same areas of centuries (Quammen 4; Parks 24). Then in the taxonomic classification
flaw these "closely allied" spices can be "systematically classified, according to their shared
similarities" which, suggests that "closely allied" organisms descended from common ancestor
because of the traits and similar organs that allows this type of classification (Quammen 5). The
presence of these similar traits and organs introduces the flaw of vestigial characteristics because
although some of these do not have any current

Evolution Vs. Creationism Essay
Evolution vs. Creationism
Abstract
In the history of science vs. religion there have been no issues more intensely debated than
evolution vs. creationism. The issue is passionately debated since the majority of evidence is in
favor of evolution, but the creation point of view can never be proved wrong because of religious
belief. Human creation breaks down into three simple beliefs; creation theory, naturalistic evolution
theory, and theistic evolution theory. The complexities of all three sides create a dilemma for what
theory to support among all people, religious and non–religious.
The theories of human evolution may always cause a heated dispute. Each theory presents its own
evidence proving...show more content...
Until science proves its naturalistic theory correct, the world will have to choose between the three
theories based on personal beliefs, religious values, and scientific information.
The creation theory includes over 500 different creation stories based on numerous religions
(Religious Tolerance, 2004). The vast number of stories creates strains on which evolution story is
accurate. Christians that are creationists take the bible literally and believe the earth is around
10,000 years old. The creation theory will always exist with religion, so the creation theory can
never be proved wrong since it is simply a religious belief. Religion is still very important in the
United States, and the acceptance of the naturalization theory would completely change Christianity
all together. Religious Tolerance, a website that outlays the conflict of evolution vs. creationism,
explains how naturalism would shake Christianity. Religious tolerance states that the acceptance of
evolution would make people interpret Genesis symbolically and classify evolution stories as
myths. Since the creation stories are closely tied to the fall of man and to original sin, the entire
role of Jesus would change. Without original sin, there would be no need for a savior, and
Christianity would change drastically. This further proves that the creation theory will live as long
as religion. The Gallup Organization studies what percentages of Americans believe in each of

Where we come from is a question as old as mankind itself. There are countless numbers of
religions, each with their own twist on the origins of earth and mankind, but one of the most highly
visible debates would be creationism vs. evolution. Depending on where your beliefs lie, the Earth
has been around somewhere in the neighborhood of 6,000 years to 4.5 billion years. One would tend
to believe that this vast difference in time would make it impossible to have 2 "theories" that are
so widely accepted. However this debate gives you just that. Each argument has its variations,
however it comes down to either God created the Earth and all things in it as they are now or that
life today has evolved from a...show more content...
Under the same idea, the "Old Earth" train of thought is that the "days" mentioned in Genesis were
actually up to many millions of years each. This is one of many "theories" that justifies the actual
age of the Earth being around 4.5 billion years old. The third view states that the story of creation
contained in Genesis is not a literal or even a chronological account of happenings. It is instead a
guide promoting a six–day workweek with the seventh day a day of worship to God. The last view is
much like the second, in that it considers the "days" to be God's workdays, which may or may not
be equal to an Earth calendar day. Each day represents a period of time that God performed a major
task. Each view has the same underlying concept that God created everything, and the way it is
today, it the way it was when it was created.
Webster's Dictionary defines evolution as a theory that the various types of animals and plants have
their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modification
in successive generations. Like creation, evolution is not immune from differing of opinions.
Evolution is split between two frames of though, naturalistic and theistic.
Naturalistic evolution is pretty much cut and dry. It simply states that life started as a single
one–celled organism. The universe was created 14 billion years ago, and the Earth was

As we have learned in class and as we still see now in the modern world, the topic of evolution vs
creationism has been one of much dispute. To many, there is only one side; you either believe in
God or in Science, you either believe that Adam and Eve are our ancestors or you believe that
through the years and the changes in the world we have evolved from apes. Whichever side you
find yourself on there will always be someone that disagrees with you and is willing to tell you why
you are wrong.
Similarly, to the Scopes Trials in 1925; Edward Humes, an award–winning journalist wrote Monkey
Girl: Evolution, Education,Religion, and the Battle for America's Soul; on the 2005 Scopes Monkey
trials in Dover, Pennsylvania. These trials focused on the school board's requirement of including
Intelligent design as a counter to evolution in biology courses and eleven parents arguing that the
change was like forcing creationist ideas on their children. The trials lasted 3 months and caused
many to form their opinions and chose a side. In...show more content...
He shows us both side of the coin and basically shows us through writing the spectacle that people
made of the trial. Those who sided with the school rejected evolution but didn't have an actual
explanation as to why it was wrong other than that it was just not the truth. For example,Bill
Buckingham, school board member who as Humes writes, "was set up as the villain in the drama
(Humes, p.310);" only believed in that America was founded on religion and he completely rejected
evolution without even knowing enough on either of them (Humes, p.310–311). Although in the end
Buckingham and his supporters did lose the trial, it did not hide the fact that there will always be a
disagreement when it comes to whether teaching evolution and not religion in schools is

Young Earth Creationism
Are we alone in this universe? Scientists and theologians have for centuries toyed with the idea to
provide some sort of explanation of whether or not there is intelligent life in outer space. The
exponential growth of scientific discovery in astronomy due to the advancement of technology and
the basic understanding of life on our planet has increased our understanding of outer space. As a
result to this increase in knowledge, researchers are better able to study the possibility of whether or
not there are intelligent beings beyond us in the Galaxy. Theological debate about extraterrestrials
has lasted for centuries in many major religions including Judaism, Roman Catholicism, the Eastern
Orthodox churches, Hinduism, Buddhism and many others (Salisbury, 2014). Currently, science and
religion does not have any actual evidence to conclude that intelligent extra terrestrial life exists.
However, in order to satisfy human's thirst for curiousity, there are developed theories in...show more
content...
Despite the fact that Young Earth Creationism is a small percentage of Christianity, their ideas are
still representative of one perspective from the religion (Gallup, 2015). A common characteristic of
strongly anthropocentric religions is a view of god as a paternalistic father–deity who created the
cosmos with humans as the focal point of the universe (McAdamis, 2011). Christians believe that
incarnation occurred only once, on Earth, for human beings. Theologians in the church have
frequently speculated about creation in its largest scope, inclusive of ''other worlds'' that may or may
not reside with the stars in the sky. While different sects within Christianity may differ slightly in
details and in emphasis, these human centered doctrines are at the core of the religion. These
questions posed are independent of scientific

Creationism is the theory that man, the earth, and the rest of the universe was originally created
rather than randomly exploding from nothingness into chance existence. We reside on the surface of
a small superbly crafted, autonomous self regulating space vehicle. Together with survival, conquest
and death we bear witness to beauty, fragrances, love and music. Think about this. Mathematics,
philosophy, springtime, depravity, farming, courtship, quasars, and iphones; all came from
nothingness?, formed by chance......?
Of all the generations thus far to inhabit the Earth, we have the least excuse for not recognizing the
quiet presence of The Scientific Mathematician who set everything into motion around us. We
should be in awe, not...show more content...
"And God said, let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit trees
yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: And it was so. "And the
earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding, fruit, whose
seed was in itself, after his kind; and God saw that it was good. "And the evening and the
morning were the third day.
"And God said let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to divide the day from the
night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years. "And let them be
for lights in the firmament of the heavens to give light upon the earth; and it was so. "And
God made two great lights: The greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night: He
made the stars also. "And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the
earth. "And to rule over the day and over the night and to divide the light from the darkness:
and God saw that it was good. "And the evening, and the morning were the fourth day.
"And God said, let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath light, and
fowls that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven. "And God created great
whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their
kind,

Evolution vs. Creationism Essay
The Evolution vs. Creationism controversy goes all the way back to the Publishing of Origin of
Species in 1859 by Darwin laying the foundation for the evolution of life to be understood. Scientists
are continuously finding more evidence to support Darwin's conclusion; that organisms descended
from a common ancestor modified by the mechanism of natural selection resulting in the evolution
of species adapting to their environment. The following are the main geological topics concerning
creationism: radiometric dating, transitional forms and the Cambrian explosion. Creationism is
nothing more than a child's fairytale that lacks any scientific proof.
The aspect of radiometric dating is controversial to most...show more content...
Plus or minus a couple million years has a negligible effect on the results attempting to be obtained.
Radiometric dating consistently prove from analysis of bolide fragments that the earth is about 4.6
billion years old and once again disproving the Bible's 6,000 years. The problem for creationism is
that they can't prove there 'fairytale' correct because it's based on little fact, so they attempt to make
the other valid ideas sound ridiculous. Therefore, creationism attempts to prove radiometric dating
incorrect and is nothing more than a feeble attempt to bring credibility to there own ideas and beliefs.
Secondly, a once thought problem with evolution was the lack of transitional phases in the fossil
record. For example it was once thought there were no transitional phases between birds and reptiles;
this has now been proven false by paleontologists. Archaeopteryx has distinctive avian characteristics
including a wishbone, a bony sternum and feathers (Geology). Several of its reptilian characteristics
include unfused metacarpal bones, a long bony tail and three well developed fingers. What is also
interesting is that archaeopteryx lived at the same time as the dinosaurs. Again, it seems as if
creationists randomly start making assumptions in an attempt to slander other valid theories rather
than proving there's correct (even thought that's impossible). "If evolution were true, there would be
more transitional

Creationism Vs Creationism
The bible says that such people have no excuse for adopting a view that excludes god. Romans
1:18 says that they are suppressing the truth in their unrighteousness because god's existence is
evident from what he has created. People do not believe there is a god because he is not present.
Even though some people think that modern life evolved over millions of years, creationism is the
most believable theory compared to evolution. Within the secular worldview, intelligent people are
feverishly trying to work out clever–sounding ways to try to explain how the universe made itself,
life made itself, and the diversity of life–forms on earth also made themselves. These evolutionists
and scientists are operating on the law of cause and effect; that things do not happen without
something sufficient to cause them to happen. But that 'minor point' is overlooked. People can not
rely on all of these points they are making because they have no proof whatsoever, they did not live
in the past to witness these things. Creationism, the belief that the universe and the various forms
of life were created by god out of nothing. It is a response to modern evolutionary theory, which
explains the emergence and diversity of life without recourse to the doctrine of god or any other
divine power. Mainstream scientists generally reject creationism. Biblical creationists believe that
the story told in the Genesis of God's six–day creation of all things is literally correct. Others, such
as old–Earth

Reflection On Creationism
For decades, evolution and creationism have been a topic of a broader debate between science and
religion. As a product of twelve years of Catholic school education, my knowledge of evolution is
biased. One teacher, specifically, refused to teach the concept of evolution because it conflicted with
her personal beliefs as a practicing nun. My biology teacher, however, taught evolution through
multiple perspectives. I am a faith–filled individual with a scientific mind. There is too much
scientific evidence backing evolution to disregard the concept altogether, yet I believe in the role of
a higher being on creation. In regards to human evolution, I believe that our physical makeup has
evolved from earlier life form, while our souls were...show more content...
According to their beliefs, there was no need to form scientific theories because everything we need
to know is written in scripture. She made the analogy that scripture is to human knowledge as a
manual is to a toaster, signifying that there can be no explanation without a guide. Another
organization that slightly resembled the beliefs of Hare Krishna and forced me to analyze new
outlooks was that of the Turkish government, explained by Paige. They have strict policies that
prohibit teachings of evolution prior to a college education because it rivals the country's religion of
Islam. The president of Turkey believes that evolution should only be taught when there is a strong
foundation of religion present. This approach made me think; what if I, as a current college student,
had been deprived of universal knowledge until now because the government wanted me to believe
in one thing over another. In response to Hare Krishna and the government of Turkey, many
organizations and people stood up for the scientific background regarding evolution. The National
Center for Science Education, portrayed by Eryn, believed that evolution is a building block for
most sciences: biology and chemistry, in particular. The organization fought that without evolution,
the country of Turkey would be sufficiently behind in scientific advancement. They also fight for the

Creationism
Bobby Rappach 11–1–12 Mr. Boyle Creationism The concept of Creationism has been around since
a monotheistic Abrahamic God. It is nothing more than a literal interpretation of the creation story
of Genesis as a basis for the creation of everything in the universe. Until the early 1500's it was the
common belief that the world was flat and this is one the only exceptions that creationist sects have
excepted when it comes to modern day science along with the earth not being the center of the
universe. Today's definition can be understood as Christianity and Catholicism until the years
surrounding 1500AD. Even after such discoveries it had a large amount of belief compared to new
scientific discoveries. As scientific advances over...show more content...
In geology, instead of the Earth's rock layers forming over millions of years they believe that
Noah's Great Flood brought upon the shape of mountains and diverse amounts of hills, valleys,
plateaus etc. One of the greatest controversies when it comes to creationists is the idea of
dinosaurs and humans. Today the average person could tell you that dinosaurs were around
before humans, but not creationists. They believe that along with other animals, dinosaurs were
brought on Noah's Ark and died out due to rapid climate change. Since dinosaurs were not
mentioned in the bible, they were referred to as dragons, behemoths, and leviathans brings upon
the idea in their mind that they lived along side the ancient people mentioned in the bible. In this
they denounce the geology of dating rocks and fossils by criticizing the formula used to date
them back millions of years. In chemistry they have said that the carbon dating of radioactive
isotopes is incorrect because of the lack of 100% accuracy while being relatively close, they have
created there own formula which no matter how they date it, it will always come to a conclusion
of less than 10,000 years ago. Away from the science controversy in their belief, on a theological
level they believe most of the same views as Catholics. There are three persons in one God as well
as Jesus being born of the Virgin Mary. Also, they believe in the resurrection as well as Satan being
an

Creationism Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Paper Writer Service

More from Paper Writer Service (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Creationism Essay