This document discusses plane frame analysis using the finite element method. It begins by introducing the learning objectives of deriving the stiffness matrix for a 2D beam element and analyzing rigid plane frames using the direct stiffness method. It then derives the local stiffness matrix for a generally oriented 2D beam element. The document provides an example problem of analyzing a rigid plane frame with four elements subjected to loads at two nodes. It shows the derivation of the element stiffness matrices, assembly of the global stiffness matrix, application of boundary conditions, and solution for nodal displacements and rotations.
Body travel performance improvement of space vehicle electromagnetic suspensi...Mustefa Jibril
Electromagnetic suspension system (EMS) is mostly used in the field of high-speed vehicle. In this paper, a space exploring vehicle quarter electromagnetic suspension system is modelled, designed and simulated using linear quadratic optimal control problem. Linear quadratic Gaussian and linear quadratic integral controllers are designed to improve the body travel of the vehicle using bump road profile. Comparison between the proposed controllers is done and a promising simulation result have been analyzed.
Deformation Analysis of a Triangular Mild Steel Plate Using CST as Finite Ele...IJMER
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) is Peer reviewed, online Journal. It serves as an international archival forum of scholarly research related to engineering and science education.
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) covers all the fields of engineering and science: Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Computer Engineering, Agricultural Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Thermodynamics, Structural Engineering, Control Engineering, Robotics, Mechatronics, Fluid Mechanics, Nanotechnology, Simulators, Web-based Learning, Remote Laboratories, Engineering Design Methods, Education Research, Students' Satisfaction and Motivation, Global Projects, and Assessment…. And many more.
Body travel performance improvement of space vehicle electromagnetic suspensi...Mustefa Jibril
Electromagnetic suspension system (EMS) is mostly used in the field of high-speed vehicle. In this paper, a space exploring vehicle quarter electromagnetic suspension system is modelled, designed and simulated using linear quadratic optimal control problem. Linear quadratic Gaussian and linear quadratic integral controllers are designed to improve the body travel of the vehicle using bump road profile. Comparison between the proposed controllers is done and a promising simulation result have been analyzed.
Deformation Analysis of a Triangular Mild Steel Plate Using CST as Finite Ele...IJMER
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) is Peer reviewed, online Journal. It serves as an international archival forum of scholarly research related to engineering and science education.
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) covers all the fields of engineering and science: Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Computer Engineering, Agricultural Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Thermodynamics, Structural Engineering, Control Engineering, Robotics, Mechatronics, Fluid Mechanics, Nanotechnology, Simulators, Web-based Learning, Remote Laboratories, Engineering Design Methods, Education Research, Students' Satisfaction and Motivation, Global Projects, and Assessment…. And many more.
Hierarchical Digital Twin of a Naval Power SystemKerry Sado
A hierarchical digital twin of a Naval DC power system has been developed and experimentally verified. Similar to other state-of-the-art digital twins, this technology creates a digital replica of the physical system executed in real-time or faster, which can modify hardware controls. However, its advantage stems from distributing computational efforts by utilizing a hierarchical structure composed of lower-level digital twin blocks and a higher-level system digital twin. Each digital twin block is associated with a physical subsystem of the hardware and communicates with a singular system digital twin, which creates a system-level response. By extracting information from each level of the hierarchy, power system controls of the hardware were reconfigured autonomously. This hierarchical digital twin development offers several advantages over other digital twins, particularly in the field of naval power systems. The hierarchical structure allows for greater computational efficiency and scalability while the ability to autonomously reconfigure hardware controls offers increased flexibility and responsiveness. The hierarchical decomposition and models utilized were well aligned with the physical twin, as indicated by the maximum deviations between the developed digital twin hierarchy and the hardware.
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptxR&R Consult
CFD analysis is incredibly effective at solving mysteries and improving the performance of complex systems!
Here's a great example: At a large natural gas-fired power plant, where they use waste heat to generate steam and energy, they were puzzled that their boiler wasn't producing as much steam as expected.
R&R and Tetra Engineering Group Inc. were asked to solve the issue with reduced steam production.
An inspection had shown that a significant amount of hot flue gas was bypassing the boiler tubes, where the heat was supposed to be transferred.
R&R Consult conducted a CFD analysis, which revealed that 6.3% of the flue gas was bypassing the boiler tubes without transferring heat. The analysis also showed that the flue gas was instead being directed along the sides of the boiler and between the modules that were supposed to capture the heat. This was the cause of the reduced performance.
Based on our results, Tetra Engineering installed covering plates to reduce the bypass flow. This improved the boiler's performance and increased electricity production.
It is always satisfying when we can help solve complex challenges like this. Do your systems also need a check-up or optimization? Give us a call!
Work done in cooperation with James Malloy and David Moelling from Tetra Engineering.
More examples of our work https://www.r-r-consult.dk/en/cases-en/
Explore the innovative world of trenchless pipe repair with our comprehensive guide, "The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair." This document delves into the modern methods of repairing underground pipes without the need for extensive excavation, highlighting the numerous advantages and the latest techniques used in the industry.
Learn about the cost savings, reduced environmental impact, and minimal disruption associated with trenchless technology. Discover detailed explanations of popular techniques such as pipe bursting, cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) lining, and directional drilling. Understand how these methods can be applied to various types of infrastructure, from residential plumbing to large-scale municipal systems.
Ideal for homeowners, contractors, engineers, and anyone interested in modern plumbing solutions, this guide provides valuable insights into why trenchless pipe repair is becoming the preferred choice for pipe rehabilitation. Stay informed about the latest advancements and best practices in the field.
Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)MdTanvirMahtab2
This presentation is about the working procedure of Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL). A Govt. owned Company of Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation under Ministry of Industries.
Water scarcity is the lack of fresh water resources to meet the standard water demand. There are two type of water scarcity. One is physical. The other is economic water scarcity.
Overview of the fundamental roles in Hydropower generation and the components involved in wider Electrical Engineering.
This paper presents the design and construction of hydroelectric dams from the hydrologist’s survey of the valley before construction, all aspects and involved disciplines, fluid dynamics, structural engineering, generation and mains frequency regulation to the very transmission of power through the network in the United Kingdom.
Author: Robbie Edward Sayers
Collaborators and co editors: Charlie Sims and Connor Healey.
(C) 2024 Robbie E. Sayers
Saudi Arabia stands as a titan in the global energy landscape, renowned for its abundant oil and gas resources. It's the largest exporter of petroleum and holds some of the world's most significant reserves. Let's delve into the top 10 oil and gas projects shaping Saudi Arabia's energy future in 2024.
2. Learning Objectives
• To derive the two-dimensional arbitrarily oriented
beam element stiffness matrix
• To demonstrate solutions of rigid plane frames by
the direct stiffness method
• To describe how to handle inclined or skewed
supports
Plane Frame and Grid Equations
2
3. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Many structures, such as buildings and bridges, are
composed of frames and/or grids.
This chapter develops the equations and methods for solution
of plane frames and grids.
First, we will develop the stiffness matrix for a beam element
arbitrarily oriented in a plane. 3
4. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Many structures, such as buildings and bridges, are
composed of frames and/or grids.
We will then include the axial nodal displacement degree of
freedom in the local beam element stiffness matrix.
4
5. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Many structures, such as buildings and bridges, are
composed of frames and/or grids.
Then we will combine these results to develop the stiffness
matrix, including axial deformation effects, for an arbitrarily
oriented beam element.
We will also consider frames with inclined or skewed supports.5
6. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Two-Dimensional Arbitrarily Oriented Beam Element
The local degrees of freedom may be related to the global
degrees of freedom by:
where T has been expanded to include axial effects
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
u u
C S
v v
S C
u u
C S
v v
S C
d Td
6
7. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Two-Dimensional Arbitrarily Oriented Beam Element
Substituting the above transformation T into the general form
of the stiffness matrix gives:
2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2
2 2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2
12 12 6 12 12 6
12 6 12 12 6
6 6
4 2
12 12 6
12 6
4
I I I I I I
AC S A CS S AC S A CS S
L L
L L L L
I I I I I
AS C C A CS AS C C
L L
L L L
I I
E I S C I
k L L
L
I I I
AC S A CS S
L
L L
I I
symmetric AS C C
L
L
I
7
8. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Two-Dimensional Arbitrarily Oriented Beam Element
The analysis of a rigid plane frame can be accomplished by
applying stiffness matrix.
A rigid plane frame is: a series of beam elements rigidly
connected to each other; that is, the original angles made
between elements at their joints remain unchanged after the
deformation.
8
9. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Two-Dimensional Arbitrarily Oriented Beam Element
Furthermore, moments are transmitted from one element to
another at the joints.
Hence, moment continuity exists at the rigid joints.
9
10. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Two-Dimensional Arbitrarily Oriented Beam Element
In addition, the element centroids, as well as the applied
loads, lie in a common plane.
We observe that the element stiffnesses of a frame are
functions of E, A, L, I, and the angle of orientation of the
element with respect to the global-coordinate axes.
10
11. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Consider the frame shown in the figure below.
The frame is fixed at nodes 1 and 4 and subjected to a
positive horizontal force of 10,000 lb applied at node 2 and to
a positive moment of 5,000 lb-in applied at node 3.
11
12. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Consider the frame shown in the figure below.
Let E = 30 x 106 psi and A = 10 in2 for all elements, and let I =
200 in4 for elements 1 and 3, and I = 100 in4 for element 2.
12
13. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Element 1: The angle between x and x’ is 90°
0 1
C S
2
2
2
12 12(200)
0.167
120
I
in
L
6
3
30 10
250,000
120
E lb
in
L
3
6 6(200)
10.0
120
I
in
L
13
14. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Element 1: The angle between x and x’ is 90°
1 1 1 2 2 2
(1)
0.167 0 10 0.167 0 10
0 10 0 0 10 0
10 0 800 10 0 400
250,000
0.167 0 10 0.167 0 10
0 10 0 0 10 0
10 0 400 10 0 800
u v u v
lb
in
k
14
15. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Element 2: The angle between x and x’ is 0°
1 0
C S
2
2
2
12 12(100)
0.0835
120
I
in
L
6
3
30 10
250,000
120
E lb
in
L
3
6 6(100)
5.0
120
I
in
L
15
16. 2 2 2 3 3 3
(2)
10 0 0 10 0 0
0 0.0835 5 0 0.0835 5
0 5 400 0 5 200
250,000
10 0 0 10 0 0
0 0.0835 5 0 0.0835 5
0 5 200 0 5 400
u v u v
lb
in
k
Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Element 2: The angle between x and x’ is 0°
16
17. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Element 3: The angle between x and x’ is 270°
0 1
C S
2
2
2
12 12(200)
0.167
120
I
in
L
6
3
30 10
250,000
120
E lb
in
L
3
6 6(200)
10.0
120
I
in
L
17
18. 3 3 3 4 4 4
(3)
0.167 0 10 0.167 0 10
0 10 0 0 10 0
10 0 800 10 0 400
250,000
0.167 0 10 0.167 0 10
0 10 0 0 10 0
10 0 400 10 0 800
u v u v
lb
in
k
Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Element 3: The angle between x and x’ is 270°
18
19. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
The boundary conditions for this problem are:
1 1 1 4 4 4 0
u v u v
After applying the boundary conditions the global beam
equations reduce to:
2
2
2
5
3
3
3
10,000 10.167 0 10 10 0 0
0 0 10.0835 5 0 0.0835 5
0 10 5 1200 0 5 200
2.5 10
0 10 0 0 10.167 0 10
0 0 0.0835 5 0 10.0835 5
5,000 0 5 200 10 5 1200
u
v
u
v
2 2 2 3 3 3
u v u v
19
20. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Solving the above equations gives: 2
2
2
3
3
3
0.211
0.00148
0.00153
0.209
0.00148
0.00149
u in
v in
rad
u in
v in
rad
y
20
21. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Solving the above equations gives:
y
21
22. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Element 1: The element force-displacement equations can
be obtained using f’ = k’Td. Therefore, Td is:
1
1
1
2
2
2
0
0 1 0 0 0 0
0
1 0 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0.211
0 0 0 0 1 0
0.00148
0 0 0 1 0 0
0.00153
0 0 0 0 0 1
u
v
u in
v in
rad
Td
0 1
C S
0
0
0
0.00148
0.211
0.00153
in
in
rad
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
C S
S C
T
C S
S C
22
23. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Element 1: Recall the elemental stiffness matrix is:
1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2 2
1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2 2
0 0 0 0
0 12 6 0 12 6
0 6 4 0 6 2
0 0 0 0
0 12 6 0 12 6
0 6 2 0 6 4
C C
C LC C LC
LC C L LC C L
C C
C LC C LC
LC C L LC C L
k
(1) 5
10 0 0 10 0 0 0
0 0.167 10 0 0.167 10 0
0 10 800 0 10 400 0
2.5 10
10 0 0 10 0 10 0.00148
0 0.167 10 0 0.167 10 0.211
0 10 400 0 10 800 0.00153
in
in
rad
f k Td
The local force-displacement equations are:
4 6
2 3
3
200 30 10
3,472.22
120
lb
in
in psi
EI
C
L in
2 6
6
1
10 30 10
2.5 10
120
lb
in
in psi
AE
C
L in
23
24. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Element 1: Simplifying the above equations gives:
1
1
1
2
2
2
3,700
4,990
376
3,700
4,990
223
x
y
x
y
f lb
f lb
m k in
f lb
f lb
m k in
24
25. 2
2
2
3
3
3
0.211
1 0 0 0 0 0
0.00148
0 1 0 0 0 0
0.00153
0 0 1 0 0 0
0.209
0 0 0 1 0 0
0.00148
0 0 0 0 1 0
0.00149
0 0 0 0 0 1
u in
v in
rad
u in
v in
rad
Td
Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Element 2: The element force-displacement equations can
be obtained using f’ = k’Td. Therefore, Td is:
1 0
C S
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
C S
S C
T
C S
S C
0.211
0.00148
0.00153
0.209
0.00148
0.00149
in
in
rad
in
in
rad
25
26. (2) 5
10 0 0 10 0 0 0.211
0 0.0833 5 0 0.0833 5 0.00148
0 5 400 0 5 200 0.00153
2.5 10
10 0 0 10 0 0 0.209
0 0.0833 5 0 0.0833 5 0.00148
0 5 200 0 5 400 0.00149
in
in
rad
in
in
rad
f k Td
Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Element 2: The local force-displacement equations are:
The local force-displacement equations are:
1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2 2
1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2 2
0 0 0 0
0 12 6 0 12 6
0 6 4 0 6 2
0 0 0 0
0 12 6 0 12 6
0 6 2 0 6 4
C C
C LC C LC
LC C L LC C L
C C
C LC C LC
LC C L LC C L
k
2 6
6
1
10 30 10
2.5 10
120
lb
in
in psi
AE
C
L in
4 6
2 3
3
100 30 10
1,736.11
120
lb
in
in psi
EI
C
L in
26
27. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Element 2: Simplifying the above equations gives:
2
2
2
3
3
3
5,010
3,700
223
5,010
3,700
221
x
y
x
y
f lb
f lb
m k in
f lb
f lb
m k in
27
28. 3
3
3
4
4
4
0.209
0 1 0 0 0 0
0.00148
1 0 0 0 0 0
0.00149
0 0 1 0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0 1 0
0
0 0 0 1 0 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 1
u in
v in
rad
u
v
Td
Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Element 3: The element force-displacement equations can
be obtained using f’ = k’Td. Therefore, Td is:
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
C S
S C
T
C S
S C
0 1
C S
0.00148
0.209
0.00149
0
0
0
in
in
rad
28
29. (3) 5
10 0 0 10 0 0 0.00148
0 0.167 10 0 0.167 10 0.209
0 10 800 0 10 400 0.00149
2.5 10
10 0 0 10 0 10 0
0 0.167 10 0 0.167 10 0
0 10 400 0 10 800 0
in
in
rad
f k Td
Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Element 3: The local force-displacement equations are:
The local force-displacement equations are:
1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2 2
1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2 2
0 0 0 0
0 12 6 0 12 6
0 6 4 0 6 2
0 0 0 0
0 12 6 0 12 6
0 6 2 0 6 4
C C
C LC C LC
LC C L LC C L
C C
C LC C LC
LC C L LC C L
k
2 6
6
1
10 30 10
2.5 10
120
lb
in
in psi
AE
C
L in
4 6
2 3
3
200 30 10
3,472.22
120
lb
in
in psi
EI
C
L in
29
30. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Element 3: Simplifying the above equations gives:
3
3
3
4
4
4
3,700
5,010
226
3,700
5,010
375
x
y
x
y
f lb
f lb
m k in
f lb
f lb
m k in
30
31. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 1
Check the equilibrium of all the elements:
31
32. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 2
Consider the frame shown in the figure below.
The frame is fixed at nodes 1 and 3 and subjected to a
positive distributed load of 1,000 lb/ft applied along element 2.
Let E = 30 x 106 psi and A = 100 in2 for all elements, and
let I = 1,000 in4 for all elements. 32
33. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 2
First we need to replace the distributed load with a set of
equivalent nodal forces and moments acting at nodes 2 and 3.
For a beam with both end fixed, subjected to a uniform
distributed load, w, the nodal forces and moments are:
2 3
(1,000 / )40
20
2 2
y y
wL lb ft ft
f f k
2 2
2 3
(1,000 / )(40 )
133,333
12 12
wL lb ft ft
m m lb ft
1,600 k in
33
34. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 2
If we consider only the parts of the stiffness matrix associated
with the three degrees of freedom at node 2, we get:
Element 1: The angle between x and x’ is 45º
0.707 0.707
C S
2
2
2
12 12(1,000)
0.0463
12 30 2
I
in
L
6
3
30 10
58.93
12 30 2
E k
in
L
3
6 6(1,000)
11.785
12 30 2
I
in
L
34
35. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 2
If we consider only the parts of the stiffness matrix associated
with the three degrees of freedom at node 2, we get:
Element 1: The angle between x and x’ is 45º
2 2 2
(1)
50.02 49.98 8.33
58.93 49.98 50.02 8.33
8.33 8.33 4000
u v
k
in
k
2 2 2
(1)
2,948 2,945 491
2,945 2,948 491
491 491 235,700
u v
k
in
k
35
36. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 2
If we consider only the parts of the stiffness matrix associated
with the three degrees of freedom at node 2, we get:
Element 2: The angle between x and x’ is 0º
1 0
C S
2
2
2
12 12(1,000)
0.0521
12 40
I
in
L
6
3
30 10
52.5
12 40
E k
in
L
3
6 6(1,000)
12.5
12 40
I
in
L
36
37. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 2
If we consider only the parts of the stiffness matrix associated
with the three degrees of freedom at node 2, we get:
Element 2: The angle between x and x’ is 0º
2 2 2
(2)
100 0 0
62.50 0 0.052 12.5
0 12.5 4,000
u v
k
in
k
2 2 2
(2)
6,250 0 0
0 3.25 781.25
0 781.25 250,000
u v
k
in
k
37
38. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 2
The global beam equations reduce to:
2
2
2
0 9,198 2,945 491
20 2,945 2,951 290
1,600 491 290 485,700
u
k v
k in
Solving the above equations gives:
2
2
2
0.0033
0.0097
0.0033
u in
v in
rad
Nodal equivalent forces
38
39. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 2
2
2
2
0.0033
0.0097
0.0033
u in
v in
rad
y
39
40. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 2
y
40
41. 0.707 0.707 0 0 0 0 0
0.707 0.707 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0.707 0.707 0 0.0033
0 0 0 0.707 0.707 0 0.0097
0 0 0 0 0 1 0.0033
in
in
rad
Td
Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 2
Element 1: The element force-displacement equations can be
obtained using f’ = k’Td. Therefore, Td is:
0
0
0
0.00452
0.0092
0.0033
in
in
rad
Recall the elemental stiffness matrix is a function of
values C1, C2, and L
6
2 3
3
30 10 (1,000)
0.2273
12 30 2
k
in
EI
C
L
6
1
(100)30 10
5,893
12 30 2
k
in
AE
C
L
41
42. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 2
Element 1: The local force-displacement equations are:
Simplifying the above equations gives:
(1)
5,893 0 10 5,893 0 0 0
0 2.730 694.8 0 2.730 694.8 0
10 694.8 117,900 0 694.8 117,000 0
5,893 0 0 5,983 0 0 0.00452
0 2.730 694.8 0 2.730 694.8 0.0092
0 694.8 117,000 0 694.8 235,800 0.0033
in
in
rad
f k Td
1
1
1
2
2
2
26.64
2.268
389.1
26.64
2.268
778.2
x
y
x
y
f k
f k
m k in
f k
f k
m k in
42
43. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0033
0 1 0 0 0 0 0.0097
0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0033
0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 0
in
in
rad
Td
Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 2
Element 2: The element force-displacement equations can be
obtained using f’ = k’Td. Therefore, Td is:
Recall the elemental stiffness matrix is a function of
values C1, C2, and L
6
2 3
3
30 10 (1,000)
0.2713
12 40
k
in
EI
C
L
6
1
(100)30 10
6,250
12 40
k
in
AE
C
L
0.0033
0.0097
0.0033
0
0
0
in
in
rad
43
44. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 2
Element 2: The local force-displacement equations are:
Simplifying the above equations gives:
20.63
2.58
832.57
20.63
2.58
412.50
k
k
k in
k
k
k in
k d
(2)
6,250 0 0 6,250 0 0 0.0033
0 3.25 781.1 0 3.25 781.1 0.0097
0 781.1 250,000 0 781.1 125,000 0.0033
6,250 0 0 6,250 0 0 0
0 3.25 781.1 0 3.25 781.1 0
0 781.1 125,000 0 781.1 250,00 0
in
in
rad
f k Td
44
45. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 2
Element 2: To obtain the actual element local forces, we must
subtract the equivalent nodal forces.
2
2
2
3
3
3
20.63 0
2.58 20
832.57 1600
20.63 0
2.58 20
412.50 1600
x
y
x
y
f k
f k k
m k in k in
f k
f k k
m k in k in
20.63
17.42
767.4
20.63
22.58
2,013
k
k
k in
k
k
k in
0
f kd f
45
46. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 2
The local forces in both elements are:
Element 2
Element 1
46
47. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
In this example, we will illustrate the equivalent joint force
replacement method for a frame subjected to a load acting on
an element instead of at one of the joints of the structure.
Since no distributed loads are present, the point of application
of the concentrated load could be treated as an extra joint in
the analysis. 47
48. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
In this example, we will illustrate the equivalent joint force
replacement method for a frame subjected to a load acting on
an element instead of at one of the joints of the structure.
This approach has the disadvantage of increasing the total
number of joints, as well as the size of the total structure
stiffness matrix K. 48
49. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
In this example, we will illustrate the equivalent joint force
replacement method for a frame subjected to a load acting on
an element instead of at one of the joints of the structure.
For small structures solved by computer, this does not pose a
problem.
49
50. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
In this example, we will illustrate the equivalent joint force
replacement method for a frame subjected to a load acting on
an element instead of at one of the joints of the structure.
However, for very large structures, this might reduce the
maximum size of the structure that could be analyzed.
50
51. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
In this example, we will illustrate the equivalent joint force
replacement method for a frame subjected to a load acting on
an element instead of at one of the joints of the structure.
The frame is fixed at nodes 1, 2, and 3 and subjected to a
concentrated load of 15 k applied at mid-length of element 1.
Let E = 30 x 106 psi, A = 8 in2, and let I = 800 in4 for all
elements. 51
52. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
1. Express the applied load in the
element 1 local coordinate
system (here x’ is directed from
node 1 to node 4).
2. Next, determine the equivalent
joint forces at each end of
element 1, using the Table D-1
in Appendix D.
52
53. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
53
54. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
3. Then transform the equivalent joint forces from the local
coordinate system forces into the global coordinate system
forces, using the equation: f = TTf
These global joint forces are:
4. Then we analyze the structure, using the equivalent joint
forces (plus actual joint forces, if any) in the usual manner.
5. The final internal forces developed at the ends of each
element may be obtained by subtracting Step 2 joint forces
from Step 4 joint forces. 54
55. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
Element 1: The angle between x and x’ is 63.43º (from nodes 1 to 4)
0.447 0.895
C S
3
6 6(800)
8.95
12 44.7
I
in
L
6
3
30 10
55.9
12 44.7
E k
in
L
4 4 4
(1)
90.0 178 448
178 359 244
448 244 179,000
u v
k
in
k
2
2
2
12 12(800)
0.0334
12 44.7
I
in
L
55
56. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
Element 2: The angle between x and x’ is 116.57º (from nodes 2 to 4)
0.447 0.895
C S
3
6 6(800)
8.95
12 44.7
I
in
L
6
3
30 10
55.9
12 44.7
E k
in
L
4 4 4
(2)
90.0 178 448
178 359 244
448 244 179,000
u v
k
in
k
2
2
2
12 12(800)
0.0334
12 44.7
I
in
L
56
57. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
Element 3: The angle between x and x’ is 0º (from nodes 4 to 3)
1 0
C S
3
6 6(800)
8.0
12 50
I
in
L
6
3
30 10
50.0
12 50
E k
in
L
4 4 4
(3)
400 0 0
0 1.334 400
0 400 160,000
u v
k
in
k
2
2
2
12 12(800)
0.0267
12 50
I
in
L
57
58. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
The global beam equations reduce to:
4
4
4
7.5 582 0 896
0 0 719 400
900 896 400 518,000
k u
v
k in
Solving the above equations gives:
4
4
4
0.0103
0.000956
0.00172
u in
v in
rad
58
59. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
Element 1: The element force-displacement equations can be
obtained using f’ = k’Td 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
C S
S C
C S
S C
T
0.447 0.895
C S
1
1
1
4
4
4
0.447 0.895 0 0 0 0
0.895 0.447 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0.447 0.895 0
0 0 0 0.895 0.447 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
u
v
u
v
Td
0
0
0
0.00374
0.00963
0.00172
in
in
rad
0
0
0
0.0103
0.000956
0.00172
in
in
rad
59
60. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
Element 1: Recall the elemental stiffness matrix is:
1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2 2
1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2 2
0 0 0 0
0 12 6 0 12 6
0 6 4 0 6 2
0 0 0 0
0 12 6 0 12 6
0 6 2 0 6 4
C C
C LC C LC
LC C L LC C L
C C
C LC C LC
LC C L LC C L
k
6
1
(8)30 10
447.2
12 44.72
k
in
AE
C
L
6
2 3
3
30 10 (800)
0.155
12 44.72
k
in
EI
C
L
60
61. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
Element 1: The local force-displacement equations are:
(1)
447 0 0 447 0 0 0
0 1.868 500.5 0 1.868 500.5 0
0 500.5 179,000 0 500.5 89,490 0
447 0 0 447 0 0 0.00374
0 1.868 500.5 0 1.868 500.5 0.00963
0 500.5 89,490 0 500.5 179,000 0.00172
in
in
rad
f k Td
(1)
1.67
0.88
158
1.67
0.88
311
k
k
k in
k
k
k in
f k d
(1)
k Td
61
62. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
Element 1: To obtain the actual element local forces, we must
subtract the equivalent nodal forces.
1
1
1
4
4
4
1.67 3.36
0.88 6.71
158 900
1.67 3.36
0.88 6.71
311 900
x
y
x
y
f k k
f k k
m k in k in
f k k
f k k
m k in k in
0
f kd f
5.03
7.59
1,058
1.68
5.83
589
k
k
k in
k
k
k in
62
63. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
Element 2: The element force-displacement equations can be
obtained using f’ = k’Td 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
C S
S C
C S
S C
T
0.447 0.895
C S
2
2
2
4
4
4
0.447 0.895 0 0 0 0
0.895 0.447 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0.447 0.895 0
0 0 0 0.895 0.447 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
u
v
u
v
Td
0
0
0
0.00546
0.00879
0.00172
in
in
rad
0
0
0
0.0103
0.000956
0.00172
in
in
rad
63
64. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
Element 2: Recall the elemental stiffness matrix is:
1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2 2
1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2 2
0 0 0 0
0 12 6 0 12 6
0 6 4 0 6 2
0 0 0 0
0 12 6 0 12 6
0 6 2 0 6 4
C C
C LC C LC
LC C L LC C L
C C
C LC C LC
LC C L LC C L
k
6
1
(8)30 10
447.2
12 44.72
k
in
AE
C
L
6
2 3
3
30 10 (800)
0.155
12 44.72
k
in
EI
C
L
64
65. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
Element 2: The local force-displacement equations are:
(2)
447 0 0 447 0 0 0
0 1.868 500.5 0 1.868 500.5 0
0 500.5 179,000 0 500.5 89,490 0
447 0 0 447 0 0 0.00546
0 1.868 500.5 0 1.868 500.5 0.00879
0 500.5 89,490 0 500.5 179,000 0.00172
in
in
rad
f k Td
(2)
2.44
0.877
158
2.44
0.877
312
k
k
k in
k
k
k in
f k d
(2)
k Td
65
66. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
Element 2: Since there are no applied loads on element 2,
there are no equivalent nodal forces to account for.
Therefore, the above equations are the final local nodal forces
(2)
2.44
0.877
158
2.44
0.877
312
k
k
k in
k
k
k in
f k d
66
67. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
Element 3: The element force-displacement equations can be
obtained using f’ = k’Td 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
C S
S C
C S
S C
T
1 0
C S
4
4
4
3
3
3
1 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
u
v
u
v
Td
0.0103
0.000956
0.00172
0
0
0
in
in
rad
0.0103
0.000956
0.00172
0
0
0
in
in
rad
67
68. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
Element 3: Recall the elemental stiffness matrix is:
1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2 2
1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2 2
0 0 0 0
0 12 6 0 12 6
0 6 4 0 6 2
0 0 0 0
0 12 6 0 12 6
0 6 2 0 6 4
C C
C LC C LC
LC C L LC C L
C C
C LC C LC
LC C L LC C L
k
6
1
(8)30 10
400
12 50
k
in
AE
C
L
6
2 3
3
30 10 (800)
0.111
12 50
k
in
EI
C
L
68
69. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
Element 3: The local force-displacement equations are:
(3)
400 0 0 400 0 0 0.0103
0 1.335 400 0 1.335 400 0.000956
0 400 160,000 0 400 80,000 0.00172
400 0 0 400 0 0 0
0 1.335 400 0 1.335 400 0
0 400 80,000 0 400 160,000 0
in
in
rad
f k Td
(3)
4.12
0.687
275
4.12
0.687
137
k
k
k in
k
k
k in
f k d
(3)
k Td
69
70. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 3
Element 3: Since there are no applied loads on element 3,
there are no equivalent nodal forces to account for.
Therefore, the above equations are the final local nodal forces
70
71. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 4
The frame shown below is fixed at nodes 2 and 3 and subjected
to a concentrated load of 500 kN applied at node 1.
For the bar, A = 1 x 10-3 m2, for the beam, A = 2 x 10-3 m2,
I = 5 x 10-5 m4, and L = 3 m. Let E = 210 GPa for both
elements.
Bar
Beam
71
72. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 4
Element 1: The angle between x and x’ is 0º
1 0
C S
5
4 3
6 6(5 10 )
10
3
I
m
L
6
6 3
210 10
70 10 /
3
E
kN m
L
(1) 3
1 1 1
2 0 0
70 10 0 0.067 0.10
0 0.10 0.20
u v
kN
m
k
5
5 2
2 2
12 12(5 10 )
6.67 10
(3)
I
m
L
72
73. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 4
Element 2: The angle between x and x’ is 45º
0.707 0.707
C S
2
1 1
3 2 6
(2)
10 210 10 0.5 0.5
4.24 0.5 0.5
kN
m kN
m
u v
m
m
k
1 1
(2) 3 0.354 0.354
70 10
0.354 0.354
kN
m
u v
k
73
74. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 4
Assembling the elemental stiffness matrices we obtain the
global stiffness matrix:
3
2.354 0.354 0
70 10 0.354 0.421 0.10
0 0.10 0.20
kN
m
K
The global equations are:
1
3
1
1
0 2.354 0.354 0
500 70 10 0.354 0.421 0.10
0 0 0.10 0.20
kN
m
u
kN v
74
75. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 4
Solving the above equations gives:
1
1
1
0.00388
0.0225
0.0113
u m
v m
rad
75
76. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 4
Bar Element: The bar element force-displacement equations
can be obtained using f’ = k’Td
0.707 0.707
C S
1
1 1
3 3
3
1 1 0 0
1 1 0 0
x
x
u
f v
C S
AE
f u
L C S
v
1 1 1 670
x
AE
f Cu Sv kN
L
3 1 1 670
x
AE
f Cu Sv kN
L
76
77. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 4
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
C S
S C
C S
S C
T
1
0
C
S
1
1
1
2
2
2
1 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
u
v
u
v
d Td
0.00388
0.0225
0.0113
0
0
0
m
m
rad
0.00388
0.0225
0.0113
0
0
0
m
m
rad
Beam Element: The bar element force-displacement equations
can be obtained using f’ = k’Td
77
78. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 4
Beam Element: The bar element force-displacement equations
can be obtained using f’ = k’Td
1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2 2
1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2 2
0 0 0 0
0 12 6 0 12 6
0 6 4 0 6 2
0 0 0 0
0 12 6 0 12 6
0 6 2 0 6 4
C C
C LC C LC
LC C L LC C L
C C
C LC C LC
LC C L LC C L
k
6
3
1
(0.002)210 10
140 10
3
kN
m
AE
C
L
6 5
2 3
3
210 10 (5 10 )
388.89
3
kN
m
EI
C
L
78
79. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 4
Beam Element: The bar element force-displacement equations
can be obtained using f’ = k’Td
3
(1)
2 0 0 2 0 0 0.00388
0 0.067 0.10 0 0.067 0.10 0.0225
0 0.10 0.20 0 0.10 0.10 0.0113
70 10
2 0 0 2 0 0 0
0 0.067 0.10 0 0.067 0.10 0
0 0.10 0.10 0 0.10 0.20 0
m
m
kN m
f k d
1
1
1
(1)
2
2
2
473
26.5
0.0
473
26.5
78.3
x
y
x
y
f kN
f kN
m
f kN
f kN
m kN m
f
(1)
k
d
79
80. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 4
80
81. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 5
The frame is fixed at nodes 1 and 3 and subjected to a moment
of 20 kN-m applied at node 2
Assume A = 2 x 10-2 m2, I = 2 x 10-4 m4, and E = 210 GPa for all
elements.
81
82. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 5
Element 1: The angle between x and x’ is 90º
0 1
C S
4
4 3
6 6(2 10 )
3 10
4
I
m
L
3
6
7
210 10
5.25 10
4
kN
m
E
L
2 2 2
(1) 5
0.015 0 0.03
5.25 10 0 2 0
0.03 0 0.08
u v
kN
m
k
4
4 2
2 2
12 12(2 10 )
1.5 10
(4)
I
m
L
The parts of k associated
with node 2 are:
82
83. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 5
Element 2: The angle between x and x’ is 0º
1 0
C S
4
4 3
6 6(2 10 )
2.4 10
5
I
m
L
3
6
7
210 10
4.2 10
5
kN
m
E
L
2 2 2
(2) 5
2 0 0
4.2 10 0 0.0096 0.024
0 0.024 0.08
u v
kN
m
k
4
4 2
2 2
12 12(2 10 )
9.6 10
(5)
I
m
L
The parts of k associated
with node 2 are:
83
84. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 5
Assembling the elemental stiffness matrices we obtain the
global stiffness matrix:
6
0.8480 0 0.0158
10 0 1.0500 0.0101
0.0158 0.0101 0.0756
kN
m
K
The global equations are:
2
6
2
2
0 0.8480 0 0.0158
0 10 0 1.0500 0.0101
20 0.0158 0.0101 0.0756
u
v
kN m
84
85. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 5
Solving the above equations gives:
6
2
6
2
4
2
4.95 10
2.56 10
2.66 10
u m
v m
rad
85
86. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 5
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
C S
S C
C S
S C
T
0
1
C
S
1
1
1
2
2
2
0 1 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
u
v
u
v
d Td 6
6
4
0
0
0
2.56 10
4.95 10
2.66 10
m
m
rad
6
6
4
0
0
0
4.95 10
2.56 10
2.66 10
m
m
rad
Element 1: The element force-displacement equations can be
obtained using f’ = k’Td
86
87. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 5
1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2 2
1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2 2
0 0 0 0
0 12 6 0 12 6
0 6 4 0 6 2
0 0 0 0
0 12 6 0 12 6
0 6 2 0 6 4
C C
C LC C LC
LC C L LC C L
C C
C LC C LC
LC C L LC C L
k
2 6
6
1
(2 10 )210 10
1.05 10
4
kN
m
AE
C
L
6 5
2 3
3
210 10 (5 10 )
388.89
3
kN
m
EI
C
L
Element 1: The element force-displacement equations can be
obtained using f’ = k’Td
87
88. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 5
3
(1) 6
6
4
200 0 0 200 0 0 0
0 1.5 3 0 1.5 3 0
0 3 8 0 3 4 0
5.25 10
200 0 0 200 0 0 2.56 10
0 1.5 3 0 1.5 3 4.95 10
0 3 4 0 3 8 2.66 10
m
m
rad
f k d
1
1
1
(1)
2
2
2
2.69
4.2
5.59
2.69
4.2
11.17
x
y
x
y
f kN
f kN
m kN m
f kN
f kN
m kN m
f
Element 1: The element force-displacement equations can be
obtained using f’ = k’Td
(1
)
k
d
88
89. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 5
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
C S
S C
C S
S C
T
1
0
C
S
2
2
2
3
3
3
1 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
u
v
u
v
d Td
6
6
4
4.95 10
2.56 10
2.66 10
0
0
0
m
m
rad
6
6
4
4.95 10
2.56 10
2.66 10
0
0
0
m
m
rad
Element 2: The element force-displacement equations can be
obtained using f’ = k’Td
89
90. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 5
1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2 2
1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2 2
0 0 0 0
0 12 6 0 12 6
0 6 4 0 6 2
0 0 0 0
0 12 6 0 12 6
0 6 2 0 6 4
C C
C LC C LC
LC C L LC C L
C C
C LC C LC
LC C L LC C L
k
2 6
6
1
(2 10 )210 10
0.84 10
5
kN
m
AE
C
L
6 4
2 3
3
210 10 (2 10 )
336
5
kN
m
EI
C
L
Element 2: The element force-displacement equations can be
obtained using f’ = k’Td
90
91. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Rigid Plane Frame Example 5
6
6
4
3
(2)
200 0 0 200 0 0 4.95 10
0 0.96 2.40 0 0.96 2.40 2.56 10
0 2.40 8 0 2.40 4 2.66 10
4.2 10
200 0 0 200 0 0 0
0 0.96 2.40 0 0.96 2.40 0
0 2.40 4 0 2.40 8 0
m
m
rad
f k d
2
2
2
(2)
3
3
3
4.16
2.69
8.92
4.16
2.69
4.47
x
y
x
y
f kN
f kN
m kN m
f kN
f kN
m kN m
f
Element 2: The element force-displacement equations can be
obtained using f’ = k’Td
(2)
k
d
91
92. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Inclined or Skewed Supports
If a support is inclined, or skewed, at some angle for the
global x axis, as shown below.
The boundary conditions on the displacements are not in the
global x-y directions but in the x’-y’ directions.
92
93. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Inclined or Skewed Supports
Therefore, the relationship between of the components of the
displacement in the local and the global coordinate systems at
node 3 is:
3 3
3 3
3 3
' cos sin 0
' sin cos 0
' 0 0 1
u u
v v
We can rewrite the above expression as:
3
cos sin 0
sin cos 0
0 0 1
t
3 3 3
' [ ]
d t d
93
94. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Inclined or Skewed Supports
We must transform the local boundary condition of v’3 = 0 (in
local coordinates) into the global x-y system.
94
95. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Inclined or Skewed Supports
We can apply this sort of transformation to the entire
displacement vector as:
where the matrix [Ti] is:
' [ ] or [ ] '
T
i i
d T d d T d
3
[ ] [0] [0]
[ ] [0] [ ] [0]
[0] [0] [ ]
i
I
T I
t
Both the identity matrix [I] and the matrix [t3] are 3 x 3 matrices.
95
96. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Inclined or Skewed Supports
The force vector can be transformed by using the same
transformation.
In global coordinates, the force-displacement equations are:
' [ ]
i
f T f
By using the relationship between the local and the global
displacements, the force-displacement equations become:
[ ]
f K d
[ ] [ ][ ]
i i
T f T K d
Applying the skewed support transformation to both sides of the
force-displacement equation gives:
[ ] [ ][ ][ ] '
T
i i i
T f T K T d
' [ ][ ][ ] '
T
i i
f T K T d
96
97. Plane Frame and Grid Equations
Inclined or Skewed Supports
Therefore the global equations become:
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
3 3
3 3
3 3
[ ][ ][ ]
' '
' '
x
y
x
T
i i
y
x
y
F u
F v
M
F u
T K T
F v
M
F u
F v
M
Elemental
coordinates
97