This document provides a summary of a lecture on sorting algorithms:
1) It introduces sorting concepts and sorting problems. Common sorting algorithms discussed include selection sort, insertion sort, merge sort, and quick sort.
2) Selection sort and insertion sort algorithms are explained in detail with examples. Selection sort has a running time of O(n^2) in all cases.
3) Insertion sort's running time depends on how sorted the input array is - it is O(n) for a presorted array but O(n^2) for a reverse sorted array.
4) The time complexity of both algorithms is analyzed mathematically. Selection sort is always O(n^2) while
The document discusses various sorting algorithms including selection sort, insertion sort, merge sort, quick sort, heap sort, and external sort. It provides descriptions of each algorithm, examples of how they work, and discusses implementation in languages like C++. Key steps and properties of each algorithm are outlined. Implementation details like pseudocode and functions are also described.
Sorting algorithms in C++
An introduction to sorting algorithm, with details on bubble sort and merge sort algorithms
Computer science principles course
It is a presentation on some Searching and Sorting Techniques for Computer Science.
It consists of the following techniques:
Sequential Search
Binary Search
Selection Sort
Bubble Sort
Insertion Sort
The document provides information on various sorting and searching algorithms, including bubble sort, insertion sort, selection sort, quick sort, sequential search, and binary search. It includes pseudocode to demonstrate the algorithms and example implementations with sample input data. Key points covered include the time complexity of each algorithm (O(n^2) for bubble/insertion/selection sort, O(n log n) for quick sort, O(n) for sequential search, and O(log n) for binary search) and how they work at a high level.
The document discusses several sorting algorithms and their time complexities:
- Bubble sort, insertion sort, and selection sort have O(n^2) time complexity.
- Quicksort uses a divide-and-conquer approach and has O(n log n) time complexity on average but can be O(n^2) in the worst case.
- Heapsort uses a heap data structure and has O(n log n) time complexity.
The document discusses various sorting algorithms that use the divide-and-conquer approach, including quicksort, mergesort, and heapsort. It provides examples of how each algorithm works by recursively dividing problems into subproblems until a base case is reached. Code implementations and pseudocode are presented for key steps like partitioning arrays in quicksort, merging sorted subarrays in mergesort, and adding and removing elements from a heap data structure in heapsort. The algorithms are compared in terms of their time and space complexity and best uses.
The document summarizes sorting and searching algorithms. It describes linear and binary search algorithms and analyzes their performance. It also describes selection sort, bubble sort, and heapsort algorithms. Selection sort has O(n^2) performance while bubble sort and heapsort have comparable performance to selection sort. Heapsort improves on these and has O(nlogn) performance by using a heap data structure implemented as an array.
This document describes and compares several common sorting algorithms, including bubble sort, selection sort, and insertion sort. It provides pseudocode examples to illustrate how each algorithm works and analyzes their time complexities. Specifically, it shows the steps to sort sample data using each algorithm through multiple iterations and compares their performance, with bubble, selection, and insertion sorts having O(n2) time and others like merge and quicksort having O(n log n) time.
The document discusses various sorting algorithms including selection sort, insertion sort, merge sort, quick sort, heap sort, and external sort. It provides descriptions of each algorithm, examples of how they work, and discusses implementation in languages like C++. Key steps and properties of each algorithm are outlined. Implementation details like pseudocode and functions are also described.
Sorting algorithms in C++
An introduction to sorting algorithm, with details on bubble sort and merge sort algorithms
Computer science principles course
It is a presentation on some Searching and Sorting Techniques for Computer Science.
It consists of the following techniques:
Sequential Search
Binary Search
Selection Sort
Bubble Sort
Insertion Sort
The document provides information on various sorting and searching algorithms, including bubble sort, insertion sort, selection sort, quick sort, sequential search, and binary search. It includes pseudocode to demonstrate the algorithms and example implementations with sample input data. Key points covered include the time complexity of each algorithm (O(n^2) for bubble/insertion/selection sort, O(n log n) for quick sort, O(n) for sequential search, and O(log n) for binary search) and how they work at a high level.
The document discusses several sorting algorithms and their time complexities:
- Bubble sort, insertion sort, and selection sort have O(n^2) time complexity.
- Quicksort uses a divide-and-conquer approach and has O(n log n) time complexity on average but can be O(n^2) in the worst case.
- Heapsort uses a heap data structure and has O(n log n) time complexity.
The document discusses various sorting algorithms that use the divide-and-conquer approach, including quicksort, mergesort, and heapsort. It provides examples of how each algorithm works by recursively dividing problems into subproblems until a base case is reached. Code implementations and pseudocode are presented for key steps like partitioning arrays in quicksort, merging sorted subarrays in mergesort, and adding and removing elements from a heap data structure in heapsort. The algorithms are compared in terms of their time and space complexity and best uses.
The document summarizes sorting and searching algorithms. It describes linear and binary search algorithms and analyzes their performance. It also describes selection sort, bubble sort, and heapsort algorithms. Selection sort has O(n^2) performance while bubble sort and heapsort have comparable performance to selection sort. Heapsort improves on these and has O(nlogn) performance by using a heap data structure implemented as an array.
This document describes and compares several common sorting algorithms, including bubble sort, selection sort, and insertion sort. It provides pseudocode examples to illustrate how each algorithm works and analyzes their time complexities. Specifically, it shows the steps to sort sample data using each algorithm through multiple iterations and compares their performance, with bubble, selection, and insertion sorts having O(n2) time and others like merge and quicksort having O(n log n) time.
The document discusses various sorting algorithms like bubble sort, insertion sort, selection sort, quick sort, merge sort, and heap sort. It provides descriptions of each algorithm, outlines their processes through pseudocode, and compares their time complexities. The key sorting algorithms covered are bubble sort, insertion sort, selection sort, quick sort, merge sort, and heap sort.
This is a seminar presentation on "SORTING" for Semester 2 exam at St. Xavier's College.The power point presenation deals with the requirement of sorting in our life,types of sorting techniques,code for implementing them,the time and space complexity of different sorting algorithms,the applications of sorting,its use in the industry and its future scope.The slide show contains .gif files which can't be seen here.For more details or any queries send me a mail at agmajumder@gmail.com
This document provides a 90-minute discussion on algorithms including quicksort, order statistics, searching, and substring searching. It begins with an overview of the topics and then provides details on quicksort, including the divide and conquer approach and partitioning elements around a pivot. It also describes algorithms for order statistics to find the kth smallest element, binary search, and a basic substring searching approach. Special cases and better solutions like Boyer-Moore are also mentioned.
The document discusses sorting algorithms. It begins by defining the sorting problem as taking an unsorted sequence of numbers and outputting a permutation of the numbers in ascending order. It then discusses different types of sorts like internal versus external sorts and stable versus unstable sorts. Specific algorithms covered include insertion sort, bubble sort, and selection sort. Analysis is provided on the best, average, and worst case time complexity of insertion sort.
The document discusses several sorting algorithms including selection sort, insertion sort, bubble sort, merge sort, and quick sort. It provides details on how each algorithm works including pseudocode implementations and analyses of their time complexities. Selection sort, insertion sort and bubble sort have a worst-case time complexity of O(n^2) while merge sort divides the list into halves and merges in O(n log n) time, making it more efficient for large lists.
The document discusses several sorting algorithms: selection sort, bubble sort, quicksort, and merge sort. Selection sort has linear time complexity for swaps but quadratic time for comparisons. Bubble sort is quadratic time for both swaps and comparisons, making it the least efficient. Quicksort and merge sort are the fastest algorithms, both with logarithmic time complexity of O(n log n) for swaps and comparisons. Quicksort risks quadratic behavior in the worst case if pivots are chosen poorly, while merge sort requires more data copying between temporary and full lists.
The document discusses various sorting algorithms. It describes how sorting algorithms arrange elements of a list in a certain order. Efficient sorting is important as a subroutine for algorithms that require sorted input, such as search and merge algorithms. Common sorting algorithms covered include insertion sort, selection sort, bubble sort, merge sort, and quicksort. Quicksort is highlighted as an efficient divide and conquer algorithm that recursively partitions elements around a pivot point.
Comparison sorting algorithms work by making pairwise comparisons between elements to determine the order in a sorted list. They have a lower bound of Ω(n log n) time complexity due to needing to traverse a decision tree with a minimum of n log n comparisons. Counting sort is a non-comparison sorting algorithm that takes advantage of key assumptions about the data to count and place elements directly into the output array in linear time O(n+k), where n is the number of elements and k is the range of possible key values.
Mergesort is a divide and conquer algorithm that works as follows:
1) Recursively sort the left and right halves of the array.
2) Merge the two sorted halves into a new sorted array.
3) Repeat until the entire array is sorted.
It has superior time complexity of O(n log n) in all cases but requires O(n) additional space for the auxiliary array used during merging.
This document discusses algorithms for sorting and searching. It introduces algorithm analysis and why it is important to analyze algorithms to compare different solutions, predict performance, and set parameter values. It discusses analyzing running time by counting primitive operations as a function of input size. Common growth rates like linear, quadratic, and cubic functions are introduced. Big-O notation is explained as a way to classify algorithms by their worst-case running time. Several specific sorting algorithms are described, including bubble sort, insertion sort, merge sort, and quicksort. Their pseudocode and running times are analyzed. Graph traversal algorithms like depth-first search and breadth-first search are also introduced.
Insertion sort is an algorithm that iterates through an array, comparing each element to its predecessor and swapping the two if out of order, until the entire array is sorted from lowest to highest value. It is more efficient than bubble sort because it requires fewer element comparisons. While slower than quick sort, heap sort, or merge sort for large arrays, insertion sort performs well for small or nearly-sorted data sets due to its simple implementation requiring only O(n) time at best case. Pseudocode and Java code are provided as examples.
The document discusses the merge sort algorithm. It works by recursively dividing an array into two halves, sorting each half, and then merging the sorted halves back together. The key steps are:
1) Divide the array into equal halves recursively until arrays contain a single element.
2) Sort the halves by recursively applying the merge sort algorithm.
3) Merge the sorted halves back into a single sorted array by comparing elements and copying the smaller value into the output array.
The document summarizes different searching and sorting algorithms. It discusses linear search and binary search for searching algorithms. It explains that linear search has O(n) time complexity while binary search has O(log n) time complexity. For sorting algorithms, it describes bubble sort, selection sort, and insertion sort. It provides pseudocode to illustrate how each algorithm works to sort a list or array.
Here are the answers:
1. b. Merge sort is generally more efficient than bubble sort.
2. c. Both quick sort and merge sort use a divide and conquer strategy.
3. b. Pivot element is used in quick sort.
4. b. Quick sort is generally considered the fastest sorting algorithm in practice.
5. c. The quick sort is faster than merge sort.
This document discusses various sorting algorithms including merge sort. It begins with an introduction to sorting and searching. It then provides pseudocode for the merge sort algorithm which works by dividing the array into halves, recursively sorting the halves, and then merging the sorted halves back together. An example is provided to illustrate the merge sort process. Key steps include dividing, conquering by recursively sorting subarrays, and combining through merging. The overall time complexity of merge sort is O(n log n).
The document discusses various sorting algorithms. It begins by explaining the motivation for sorting and providing examples. It then lists some common sorting algorithms like bubble sort, selection sort, and insertion sort. For each algorithm, it provides an informal description, works through examples to show how it sorts a list, and includes Java code implementations. It compares the time complexity of these algorithms, which is O(n2) for bubble sort, selection sort, and insertion sort, and explains why. The document aims to introduce fundamental sorting algorithms and their workings.
Quicksort is a sorting algorithm developed by Tony Hoare in 1960 that uses a divide-and-conquer approach. It works by first selecting a pivot element and partitioning the array around it, such that all elements with values less than the pivot come before elements with values greater than the pivot. It then recursively applies the same approach to the sub-arrays until the entire list is sorted. Radix sort is a non-comparative integer sorting algorithm that sorts data by grouping keys based on their individual digit values at each significant position. It makes multiple passes over the data, sorting by one digit on each pass in order of significant value.
1. The document discusses various sorting algorithms like bubble sort, quick sort, and merge sort. It explains their time and space complexities.
2. It describes how to count inversions during merge sort by tracking the number of elements a back element passes during the merging process. Pseudocode for the merge-and-count and sort-and-count functions is provided.
3. Related problems on sorting and inversion counting from online judges like UVA are listed along with references for further reading.
The document discusses quicksort and partition algorithms for sorting arrays. Quicksort works by recursively dividing an array into smaller sub-arrays by partitioning them based on a pivot value and sorting them. The partition algorithm divides an array into two partitions based on element values relative to the pivot. The performance of quicksort depends on how balanced the partitions are at each step.
The document discusses various sorting algorithms like bubble sort, insertion sort, selection sort, quick sort, merge sort, and heap sort. It provides descriptions of each algorithm, outlines their processes through pseudocode, and compares their time complexities. The key sorting algorithms covered are bubble sort, insertion sort, selection sort, quick sort, merge sort, and heap sort.
This is a seminar presentation on "SORTING" for Semester 2 exam at St. Xavier's College.The power point presenation deals with the requirement of sorting in our life,types of sorting techniques,code for implementing them,the time and space complexity of different sorting algorithms,the applications of sorting,its use in the industry and its future scope.The slide show contains .gif files which can't be seen here.For more details or any queries send me a mail at agmajumder@gmail.com
This document provides a 90-minute discussion on algorithms including quicksort, order statistics, searching, and substring searching. It begins with an overview of the topics and then provides details on quicksort, including the divide and conquer approach and partitioning elements around a pivot. It also describes algorithms for order statistics to find the kth smallest element, binary search, and a basic substring searching approach. Special cases and better solutions like Boyer-Moore are also mentioned.
The document discusses sorting algorithms. It begins by defining the sorting problem as taking an unsorted sequence of numbers and outputting a permutation of the numbers in ascending order. It then discusses different types of sorts like internal versus external sorts and stable versus unstable sorts. Specific algorithms covered include insertion sort, bubble sort, and selection sort. Analysis is provided on the best, average, and worst case time complexity of insertion sort.
The document discusses several sorting algorithms including selection sort, insertion sort, bubble sort, merge sort, and quick sort. It provides details on how each algorithm works including pseudocode implementations and analyses of their time complexities. Selection sort, insertion sort and bubble sort have a worst-case time complexity of O(n^2) while merge sort divides the list into halves and merges in O(n log n) time, making it more efficient for large lists.
The document discusses several sorting algorithms: selection sort, bubble sort, quicksort, and merge sort. Selection sort has linear time complexity for swaps but quadratic time for comparisons. Bubble sort is quadratic time for both swaps and comparisons, making it the least efficient. Quicksort and merge sort are the fastest algorithms, both with logarithmic time complexity of O(n log n) for swaps and comparisons. Quicksort risks quadratic behavior in the worst case if pivots are chosen poorly, while merge sort requires more data copying between temporary and full lists.
The document discusses various sorting algorithms. It describes how sorting algorithms arrange elements of a list in a certain order. Efficient sorting is important as a subroutine for algorithms that require sorted input, such as search and merge algorithms. Common sorting algorithms covered include insertion sort, selection sort, bubble sort, merge sort, and quicksort. Quicksort is highlighted as an efficient divide and conquer algorithm that recursively partitions elements around a pivot point.
Comparison sorting algorithms work by making pairwise comparisons between elements to determine the order in a sorted list. They have a lower bound of Ω(n log n) time complexity due to needing to traverse a decision tree with a minimum of n log n comparisons. Counting sort is a non-comparison sorting algorithm that takes advantage of key assumptions about the data to count and place elements directly into the output array in linear time O(n+k), where n is the number of elements and k is the range of possible key values.
Mergesort is a divide and conquer algorithm that works as follows:
1) Recursively sort the left and right halves of the array.
2) Merge the two sorted halves into a new sorted array.
3) Repeat until the entire array is sorted.
It has superior time complexity of O(n log n) in all cases but requires O(n) additional space for the auxiliary array used during merging.
This document discusses algorithms for sorting and searching. It introduces algorithm analysis and why it is important to analyze algorithms to compare different solutions, predict performance, and set parameter values. It discusses analyzing running time by counting primitive operations as a function of input size. Common growth rates like linear, quadratic, and cubic functions are introduced. Big-O notation is explained as a way to classify algorithms by their worst-case running time. Several specific sorting algorithms are described, including bubble sort, insertion sort, merge sort, and quicksort. Their pseudocode and running times are analyzed. Graph traversal algorithms like depth-first search and breadth-first search are also introduced.
Insertion sort is an algorithm that iterates through an array, comparing each element to its predecessor and swapping the two if out of order, until the entire array is sorted from lowest to highest value. It is more efficient than bubble sort because it requires fewer element comparisons. While slower than quick sort, heap sort, or merge sort for large arrays, insertion sort performs well for small or nearly-sorted data sets due to its simple implementation requiring only O(n) time at best case. Pseudocode and Java code are provided as examples.
The document discusses the merge sort algorithm. It works by recursively dividing an array into two halves, sorting each half, and then merging the sorted halves back together. The key steps are:
1) Divide the array into equal halves recursively until arrays contain a single element.
2) Sort the halves by recursively applying the merge sort algorithm.
3) Merge the sorted halves back into a single sorted array by comparing elements and copying the smaller value into the output array.
The document summarizes different searching and sorting algorithms. It discusses linear search and binary search for searching algorithms. It explains that linear search has O(n) time complexity while binary search has O(log n) time complexity. For sorting algorithms, it describes bubble sort, selection sort, and insertion sort. It provides pseudocode to illustrate how each algorithm works to sort a list or array.
Here are the answers:
1. b. Merge sort is generally more efficient than bubble sort.
2. c. Both quick sort and merge sort use a divide and conquer strategy.
3. b. Pivot element is used in quick sort.
4. b. Quick sort is generally considered the fastest sorting algorithm in practice.
5. c. The quick sort is faster than merge sort.
This document discusses various sorting algorithms including merge sort. It begins with an introduction to sorting and searching. It then provides pseudocode for the merge sort algorithm which works by dividing the array into halves, recursively sorting the halves, and then merging the sorted halves back together. An example is provided to illustrate the merge sort process. Key steps include dividing, conquering by recursively sorting subarrays, and combining through merging. The overall time complexity of merge sort is O(n log n).
The document discusses various sorting algorithms. It begins by explaining the motivation for sorting and providing examples. It then lists some common sorting algorithms like bubble sort, selection sort, and insertion sort. For each algorithm, it provides an informal description, works through examples to show how it sorts a list, and includes Java code implementations. It compares the time complexity of these algorithms, which is O(n2) for bubble sort, selection sort, and insertion sort, and explains why. The document aims to introduce fundamental sorting algorithms and their workings.
Quicksort is a sorting algorithm developed by Tony Hoare in 1960 that uses a divide-and-conquer approach. It works by first selecting a pivot element and partitioning the array around it, such that all elements with values less than the pivot come before elements with values greater than the pivot. It then recursively applies the same approach to the sub-arrays until the entire list is sorted. Radix sort is a non-comparative integer sorting algorithm that sorts data by grouping keys based on their individual digit values at each significant position. It makes multiple passes over the data, sorting by one digit on each pass in order of significant value.
1. The document discusses various sorting algorithms like bubble sort, quick sort, and merge sort. It explains their time and space complexities.
2. It describes how to count inversions during merge sort by tracking the number of elements a back element passes during the merging process. Pseudocode for the merge-and-count and sort-and-count functions is provided.
3. Related problems on sorting and inversion counting from online judges like UVA are listed along with references for further reading.
The document discusses quicksort and partition algorithms for sorting arrays. Quicksort works by recursively dividing an array into smaller sub-arrays by partitioning them based on a pivot value and sorting them. The partition algorithm divides an array into two partitions based on element values relative to the pivot. The performance of quicksort depends on how balanced the partitions are at each step.
The document discusses home sales and prices in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) for April 2013. It reports that home sales declined modestly by 2% compared to April 2012, indicating demand is strengthening after double-digit declines earlier in the year. The average home price in the GTA rose 2% to a new high of $526,335, with price increases across all housing segments. The condo apartment segment in Toronto saw a 6% price rise and was a major driver of overall price growth. This strong condo performance and price increases could mean stronger price growth in the second half of 2013 than previously forecast.
Unlocking Social CRM for your Organisation (Keynote)Joakim Nilsson
This document summarizes a presentation on using social CRM to leverage social media for customer management. It discusses how social media has changed CRM and the customer purchase funnel. It provides 5 strategies for using social media and emphasizes identifying your organization's social media presence, managing listening and engagement, and using the right tools. It also stresses the importance of developing programs with clear goals, objectives, metrics and actions to take based on social media insights.
This document discusses how technology can be used to differentiate instruction for English language learners (ELLs). It notes that ELLs often have limited access to technology at home, so using it in school is important. Various technologies are described that can help ELLs improve their language skills, including using programs like PowerPoint, MovieMaker, Audacity, and social networks. The document provides examples of how blogs, wikis, discussion boards and student-created websites can engage ELLs. It emphasizes using simple, meaningful technologies and provides resource websites for teachers.
This lightning talk provides a brief, non-technical overview of Ruby on Rails, suitable for both management and technical professionals. For an audience of Rails "newbies", the focus of the presentation is just on educating viewers about Rails. For a more experienced audience, the spin is typically on how the audience can effectively educate others about Rails as a technology.
This document provides an overview of an nCloth simulation workflow that uses low resolution cloth meshes to drive the behavior of high resolution meshes. It describes converting lower resolution shirt and pants meshes to nCloth for simulation, then using a wrap deformer to transfer the simulated deformation to high resolution meshes. This allows simulating detailed cloth meshes efficiently. It also explains how to identify and resolve common simulation issues like inaccurate collisions.
The document is the user's guide for Autodesk's Toxik software. It lists various third-party software credits and attributions, acknowledging the copyrights and licenses of the different components used in Toxik. It provides credits for software related to installation, graphics, animation, modeling, and programming.
Jazz music became popular in the 1920s and was accompanied by new dances like the shimmy, turkey trot, and bunny hug. Silent movies dominated the era and were considered an art form, with the first talking picture, The Jazz Singer, debuting in 1927. Bestselling books of the decade included The Great Gatsby and The Sun Also Rises. The 1920s saw major scientific advances such as the discovery of vitamins and insulin, as well as the first liquid-fueled rocket launch. Gang violence and prohibition were also defining aspects of the period.
The document provides tips for developing self-mastery through establishing daily habits and disciplines. Some of the key recommendations include: setting aside one hour each morning for personal development activities like meditation; laughing for five minutes in the mirror each morning; enhancing concentration by counting steps while walking; exercising willpower by waiting before eating or curbing distractions; and spending time in nature for renewal and peacefulness. The document emphasizes developing strong character through disciplined habits.
This document summarizes a study comparing sustainability indicators of vegetatively propagated (VP) and seedling tea grown organically versus conventionally in Sri Lanka. The study found no significant differences in shoot growth, yield, or pest incidence between the organic and conventional systems during the organic conversion period. Post-pruning recovery was also positive under organic management. The document concludes that organic tea production is a sustainable and feasible practice under the conditions studied.
This document discusses container virtualization and Docker. It provides an overview of IT evolution towards microservices and containers. Containers offer greater efficiency and portability compared to virtual machines. Docker is described as the standard for containerization, allowing applications to run reliably across environments. The document demonstrates Docker and a container management tool called DCHQ for deploying a sample application across load balancers, application servers and databases.
The document discusses insertion sort and its analysis. It begins by providing an overview of insertion sort, describing how it works to sort a sequence by iteratively inserting elements into their sorted position. It then gives pseudocode for insertion sort and works through an example. Next, it analyzes insertion sort's runtime, showing it is O(n^2) in the worst case and O(n) in the best case. The document concludes by introducing the divide and conquer approach for sorting, which will be covered in the next section on merge sort.
Insertion sort bubble sort selection sortUmmar Hayat
The document discusses three sorting algorithms: insertion sort, bubble sort, and selection sort. Insertion sort has best-case linear time but worst-case quadratic time, sorting elements in place. Bubble sort repeatedly compares and swaps adjacent elements, having quadratic time in all cases. Selection sort finds the minimum element and exchanges it into the sorted portion of the array in each pass, with quadratic time.
This document discusses various sorting algorithms and their time complexities. It covers common sorting algorithms like bubble sort, selection sort, insertion sort, which have O(N^2) time complexity and are slow for large data sets. More efficient algorithms like merge sort, quicksort, heapsort with O(N log N) time complexity are also discussed. Implementation details and examples are provided for selection sort, insertion sort, merge sort and quicksort algorithms.
The document discusses algorithms and their analysis. It begins by defining an algorithm and key aspects like correctness, input, and output. It then discusses two aspects of algorithm performance - time and space. Examples are provided to illustrate how to analyze the time complexity of different structures like if/else statements, simple loops, and nested loops. Big O notation is introduced to describe an algorithm's growth rate. Common time complexities like constant, linear, quadratic, and cubic functions are defined. Specific sorting algorithms like insertion sort, selection sort, bubble sort, merge sort, and quicksort are then covered in detail with examples of how they work and their time complexities.
The document discusses various sorting algorithms and their complexity. It begins by defining sorting as arranging data in increasing or decreasing order. It then discusses the complexity of sorting algorithms in terms of comparisons, swaps, and assignments needed. Sorting algorithms are divided into internal sorts, which use only main memory, and external sorts, which use external storage like disks. Popular internal sorting algorithms discussed in detail include bubble sort, selection sort, insertion sort, and merge sort. Bubble sort has a time complexity of O(n2) while merge sort and quicksort have better time complexities of O(nlogn).
The document discusses different sorting algorithms, including insertion sort, bubble sort, merge sort, quicksort, and heapsort. Insertion sort works by inserting elements into a sorted sublist until the entire list is sorted. Bubble sort repeatedly compares adjacent element pairs and swaps them if they are in the wrong order. Merge sort divides the list into halves, recursively sorts the halves, and then merges the sorted halves. Quicksort selects a pivot and partitions the list into sublists based on element values relative to the pivot. Heapsort uses a heap data structure to sort a list in O(nlogn) time on average.
The document provides information on various sorting and searching algorithms, including bubble sort, insertion sort, selection sort, quick sort, sequential search, and binary search. It includes pseudocode to demonstrate the algorithms and example implementations with sample input data. Key points covered include the time complexity of each algorithm (O(n^2) for bubble/insertion/selection sort, O(n log n) for quick sort, O(n) for sequential search, and O(log n) for binary search) and how they work at a high level.
The document discusses sorting algorithms, including insertion sort and bubble sort. It provides descriptions of how each algorithm works, including pseudocode. Key points made include:
- Insertion sort works by inserting elements into the sorted portion of the array, maintaining the invariant that the sorted portion remains sorted.
- Bubble sort works by "bubbling up" the largest elements to the end through successive passes over the array, swapping adjacent out-of-order elements.
- Optimizations for both algorithms include detecting if the array is already sorted to stop early.
This document analyzes the time complexity of insertion sort. It finds that insertion sort has:
- A best case running time of O(n) when the array is already sorted
- A worst case running time of O(n^2) when the array is in reverse sorted order
- The worst case is usually what analysts are interested in, as it provides an upper bound on the algorithm's performance
This document discusses different sorting algorithms including insertion sort, selection sort, and shell sort. It provides examples of how each algorithm works and pseudocode for implementation. Insertion sort iterates through an array and inserts each element into its sorted position. Selection sort finds the minimum element in each pass and swaps it into the front. Shell sort improves on insertion sort by comparing elements separated by gaps to sort sublists and gradually reduce the gaps.
Describes basic understanding of priority queues, their applications, methods, implementation with sorted/unsorted list, sorting applications with insertion sort and selection sort with their running times.
The document discusses binary index trees (also called Fenwick trees) and segment trees, which are data structures that allow efficient querying of array prefixes and intervals. Binary index trees support adding values to array elements and retrieving prefix sums in O(log n) time. Segment trees similarly support adding values and finding maximum/minimum values in intervals in O(log n) time. Both achieve faster query times than naive solutions by representing the array as a tree structure.
The document discusses various sorting algorithms and their time complexities, including counting sort, radix sort, bucket sort, and lower bounds for comparison-based sorting. Counting sort counts the number of occurrences of each key and uses the counts to place the elements in output array in correct positions. Radix sort performs counting sort repeatedly based on each digit of keys written in a given base. Bucket sort distributes elements into buckets based on their hashed values and sorts individual buckets. The time complexity of bucket sort is linear on average if elements are randomly distributed.
The document discusses various sorting algorithms including insertion sort, selection sort, bubble sort, merge sort, and quick sort. It provides detailed explanations of how each algorithm works through examples using arrays or lists of numbers. The key steps of each algorithm are outlined in pseudocode to demonstrate how they sort a set of data in either ascending or descending order.
Data structures and algorithms involve organizing data to solve problems efficiently. An algorithm describes computational steps, while a program implements an algorithm. Key aspects of algorithms include efficiency as input size increases. Experimental studies measure running time but have limitations. Pseudocode describes algorithms at a high level. Analysis counts primitive operations to determine asymptotic running time, ignoring constant factors. The best, worst, and average cases analyze efficiency. Asymptotic notation like Big-O simplifies analysis by focusing on how time increases with input size.
The document summarizes a lecture on algorithms that covered insertion sort, analyzing its time complexity, and an introduction to the divide and conquer approach and merge sort. It included pseudocode for insertion sort algorithms and discussed how merge sort follows the divide and conquer paradigm by dividing the problem into subproblems, solving them recursively, and combining the solutions. Pseudocode was also provided for the merge sort algorithm.
An Experiment to Determine and Compare Practical Efficiency of Insertion Sort...Tosin Amuda
Sorting is a fundamental operation in computer science (many programs use it as an intermediate step), and as a result a large number of good sorting algorithms have been developed. Which algorithm is best for a given application depends on—among other factors—the number of items to be sorted, the extent to which the items are already somewhat sorted, possible restrictions on the item values, and the kind of storage device to be used: main memory, disks, or tapes.
There are three reasons to study sorting algorithms. First, sorting algorithms illustrate many creative approaches to problem solving, and these approaches can be applied to solve other problems. Second, sorting algorithms are good for practicing fundamental programming techniques using selection statements, loops, methods, and arrays. Third, sorting algorithms are excellent examples to demonstrate algorithm performance.
However, this paper attempt to compare the practical efficiency of three sorting algorithms – Insertion, Quick and mere Sort using empirical analysis. The result of the experiment shows that insertion sort is a quadratic time sorting algorithm and that it’s more applicable to subarray that is sufficiently small. The merge sort performs better with larger size of input as compared to insertion sort. Quicksort runs the most efficiently.
The document discusses searching and sorting algorithms. It begins by explaining considerations for sorting such as how elements are compared and stored. It then describes selection sort, providing pseudocode, an example, and analysis showing it has O(n2) complexity. The document discusses searching and how binary search can find an element in a sorted array using only O(log n) comparisons.
This document discusses different sorting algorithms. It defines sorting as rearranging elements in a list or array based on a comparison operator. Three sorting algorithms are described: selection sort works by selecting the minimum element and placing it at the front of the sorted subarray; insertion sort works by inserting elements into the sorted position one by one; and bubble sort works by repeatedly swapping adjacent elements if they are in the wrong order. Examples are provided to illustrate how each algorithm sorts an array.
This document provides an introduction and overview of MATLAB (Matrix Laboratory), an interactive program for numerical computation and visualization. It discusses basic MATLAB commands and functions for creating variables and matrices, performing mathematical operations, plotting graphs, and working with polynomials.
Fueling AI with Great Data with Airbyte WebinarZilliz
This talk will focus on how to collect data from a variety of sources, leveraging this data for RAG and other GenAI use cases, and finally charting your course to productionalization.
leewayhertz.com-AI in predictive maintenance Use cases technologies benefits ...alexjohnson7307
Predictive maintenance is a proactive approach that anticipates equipment failures before they happen. At the forefront of this innovative strategy is Artificial Intelligence (AI), which brings unprecedented precision and efficiency. AI in predictive maintenance is transforming industries by reducing downtime, minimizing costs, and enhancing productivity.
Skybuffer AI: Advanced Conversational and Generative AI Solution on SAP Busin...Tatiana Kojar
Skybuffer AI, built on the robust SAP Business Technology Platform (SAP BTP), is the latest and most advanced version of our AI development, reaffirming our commitment to delivering top-tier AI solutions. Skybuffer AI harnesses all the innovative capabilities of the SAP BTP in the AI domain, from Conversational AI to cutting-edge Generative AI and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). It also helps SAP customers safeguard their investments into SAP Conversational AI and ensure a seamless, one-click transition to SAP Business AI.
With Skybuffer AI, various AI models can be integrated into a single communication channel such as Microsoft Teams. This integration empowers business users with insights drawn from SAP backend systems, enterprise documents, and the expansive knowledge of Generative AI. And the best part of it is that it is all managed through our intuitive no-code Action Server interface, requiring no extensive coding knowledge and making the advanced AI accessible to more users.
Salesforce Integration for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions A...Jeffrey Haguewood
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on integration of Salesforce with Bonterra Impact Management.
Interested in deploying an integration with Salesforce for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
Main news related to the CCS TSI 2023 (2023/1695)Jakub Marek
An English 🇬🇧 translation of a presentation to the speech I gave about the main changes brought by CCS TSI 2023 at the biggest Czech conference on Communications and signalling systems on Railways, which was held in Clarion Hotel Olomouc from 7th to 9th November 2023 (konferenceszt.cz). Attended by around 500 participants and 200 on-line followers.
The original Czech 🇨🇿 version of the presentation can be found here: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/hlavni-novinky-souvisejici-s-ccs-tsi-2023-2023-1695/269688092 .
The videorecording (in Czech) from the presentation is available here: https://youtu.be/WzjJWm4IyPk?si=SImb06tuXGb30BEH .
zkStudyClub - LatticeFold: A Lattice-based Folding Scheme and its Application...Alex Pruden
Folding is a recent technique for building efficient recursive SNARKs. Several elegant folding protocols have been proposed, such as Nova, Supernova, Hypernova, Protostar, and others. However, all of them rely on an additively homomorphic commitment scheme based on discrete log, and are therefore not post-quantum secure. In this work we present LatticeFold, the first lattice-based folding protocol based on the Module SIS problem. This folding protocol naturally leads to an efficient recursive lattice-based SNARK and an efficient PCD scheme. LatticeFold supports folding low-degree relations, such as R1CS, as well as high-degree relations, such as CCS. The key challenge is to construct a secure folding protocol that works with the Ajtai commitment scheme. The difficulty, is ensuring that extracted witnesses are low norm through many rounds of folding. We present a novel technique using the sumcheck protocol to ensure that extracted witnesses are always low norm no matter how many rounds of folding are used. Our evaluation of the final proof system suggests that it is as performant as Hypernova, while providing post-quantum security.
Paper Link: https://eprint.iacr.org/2024/257
Freshworks Rethinks NoSQL for Rapid Scaling & Cost-EfficiencyScyllaDB
Freshworks creates AI-boosted business software that helps employees work more efficiently and effectively. Managing data across multiple RDBMS and NoSQL databases was already a challenge at their current scale. To prepare for 10X growth, they knew it was time to rethink their database strategy. Learn how they architected a solution that would simplify scaling while keeping costs under control.
In the realm of cybersecurity, offensive security practices act as a critical shield. By simulating real-world attacks in a controlled environment, these techniques expose vulnerabilities before malicious actors can exploit them. This proactive approach allows manufacturers to identify and fix weaknesses, significantly enhancing system security.
This presentation delves into the development of a system designed to mimic Galileo's Open Service signal using software-defined radio (SDR) technology. We'll begin with a foundational overview of both Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) and the intricacies of digital signal processing.
The presentation culminates in a live demonstration. We'll showcase the manipulation of Galileo's Open Service pilot signal, simulating an attack on various software and hardware systems. This practical demonstration serves to highlight the potential consequences of unaddressed vulnerabilities, emphasizing the importance of offensive security practices in safeguarding critical infrastructure.
Dandelion Hashtable: beyond billion requests per second on a commodity serverAntonios Katsarakis
This slide deck presents DLHT, a concurrent in-memory hashtable. Despite efforts to optimize hashtables, that go as far as sacrificing core functionality, state-of-the-art designs still incur multiple memory accesses per request and block request processing in three cases. First, most hashtables block while waiting for data to be retrieved from memory. Second, open-addressing designs, which represent the current state-of-the-art, either cannot free index slots on deletes or must block all requests to do so. Third, index resizes block every request until all objects are copied to the new index. Defying folklore wisdom, DLHT forgoes open-addressing and adopts a fully-featured and memory-aware closed-addressing design based on bounded cache-line-chaining. This design offers lock-free index operations and deletes that free slots instantly, (2) completes most requests with a single memory access, (3) utilizes software prefetching to hide memory latencies, and (4) employs a novel non-blocking and parallel resizing. In a commodity server and a memory-resident workload, DLHT surpasses 1.6B requests per second and provides 3.5x (12x) the throughput of the state-of-the-art closed-addressing (open-addressing) resizable hashtable on Gets (Deletes).
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup SlidesZilliz
Prompting language models is hard, while programming language models is easy. In this talk, I will discuss the state-of-the-art framework DSPy for programming foundation models with its powerful optimizers and runtime constraint system.
Taking AI to the Next Level in Manufacturing.pdfssuserfac0301
Read Taking AI to the Next Level in Manufacturing to gain insights on AI adoption in the manufacturing industry, such as:
1. How quickly AI is being implemented in manufacturing.
2. Which barriers stand in the way of AI adoption.
3. How data quality and governance form the backbone of AI.
4. Organizational processes and structures that may inhibit effective AI adoption.
6. Ideas and approaches to help build your organization's AI strategy.
FREE A4 Cyber Security Awareness Posters-Social Engineering part 3Data Hops
Free A4 downloadable and printable Cyber Security, Social Engineering Safety and security Training Posters . Promote security awareness in the home or workplace. Lock them Out From training providers datahops.com
Introduction of Cybersecurity with OSS at Code Europe 2024Hiroshi SHIBATA
I develop the Ruby programming language, RubyGems, and Bundler, which are package managers for Ruby. Today, I will introduce how to enhance the security of your application using open-source software (OSS) examples from Ruby and RubyGems.
The first topic is CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures). I have published CVEs many times. But what exactly is a CVE? I'll provide a basic understanding of CVEs and explain how to detect and handle vulnerabilities in OSS.
Next, let's discuss package managers. Package managers play a critical role in the OSS ecosystem. I'll explain how to manage library dependencies in your application.
I'll share insights into how the Ruby and RubyGems core team works to keep our ecosystem safe. By the end of this talk, you'll have a better understanding of how to safeguard your code.
5th LF Energy Power Grid Model Meet-up SlidesDanBrown980551
5th Power Grid Model Meet-up
It is with great pleasure that we extend to you an invitation to the 5th Power Grid Model Meet-up, scheduled for 6th June 2024. This event will adopt a hybrid format, allowing participants to join us either through an online Mircosoft Teams session or in person at TU/e located at Den Dolech 2, Eindhoven, Netherlands. The meet-up will be hosted by Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e), a research university specializing in engineering science & technology.
Power Grid Model
The global energy transition is placing new and unprecedented demands on Distribution System Operators (DSOs). Alongside upgrades to grid capacity, processes such as digitization, capacity optimization, and congestion management are becoming vital for delivering reliable services.
Power Grid Model is an open source project from Linux Foundation Energy and provides a calculation engine that is increasingly essential for DSOs. It offers a standards-based foundation enabling real-time power systems analysis, simulations of electrical power grids, and sophisticated what-if analysis. In addition, it enables in-depth studies and analysis of the electrical power grid’s behavior and performance. This comprehensive model incorporates essential factors such as power generation capacity, electrical losses, voltage levels, power flows, and system stability.
Power Grid Model is currently being applied in a wide variety of use cases, including grid planning, expansion, reliability, and congestion studies. It can also help in analyzing the impact of renewable energy integration, assessing the effects of disturbances or faults, and developing strategies for grid control and optimization.
What to expect
For the upcoming meetup we are organizing, we have an exciting lineup of activities planned:
-Insightful presentations covering two practical applications of the Power Grid Model.
-An update on the latest advancements in Power Grid -Model technology during the first and second quarters of 2024.
-An interactive brainstorming session to discuss and propose new feature requests.
-An opportunity to connect with fellow Power Grid Model enthusiasts and users.
3. Sorting Concept
Sorting is the operation of arranging data in some
given order, such as
Ascending
the dictionary, the telephone book
Descending
grade-point average for honor students
The sorted data can be numerical data or character
data.
Sorting is one of the most common data-processing
applications.
3
4. Sorting Concept (Cont.)
Sorting problem
Let A be a sequence of n elements. Sorting A refers
to the operation of rearranging the content of A so
that they are increasing in order.
Input: A: the sequence of n numbers ( a1 , a 2 , ..., a n )
Output: A: the reordering ( a1 , a 2 ,..., a n ) of the
input sequence such that
a1 a2 an
4
5. Selection Sort
One of basic sorting algorithms
Selection Sort works as follows:
First, find the smallest elements in the data
sequence and exchange it with the element in the
first position,
Then, find the second smallest element and
exchange it with the element in the second
position and
Continue in this way until the entire sequence is
sorted.
5
7. Selection Sort Algorithm
Algorithm SelectionSort(A,n)
Input: A: a sequence of n elements
n: the size of A
Output: A: a sorted sequence in ascending order
for i = 1 to n
min = i
for j = i+1 to n
if A[j] < A[min] then
min = j
Swap(A,min,i)
7
8. Selection Sort Algorithm (Cont.)
Algorithm: Swap(A,min,i)
Input: A : a sequence of n elements
min: the position of the minimum value of A
while considers at index i of A
i: the considered index of A
Output: exchange A[i] and A[min]
temp = a[min]
a[min] = a[i]
a[i] = temp
8
9. Selection Sort Analysis
For i = 1, there are _(n-1)_ comparisons to find the
first smallest element.
For i = 2, there are _(n-2)_ comparisons to find the
second smallest element, and so on.
Accordingly, n 1
(n-1) + (n-2) + (n-3) + … + 2 + 1 = i = n(n-1)/2
i 1
The best case running time is ___ (n2)__
The worst case running time is __ O(n2)__
9
10. Insertion Sort
To solve the sorting problem
Insertion sort algorithm is almost as simple as
selection sort but perhaps more flexible.
Insertion sort is the method people often
use for sorting a hand of cards.
10
11. Insertion Sort (Cont.)
Insertion sort uses an incremental approach:
having the sorted subarray A[1…j-1], we
insert the single element A[ j ] into its proper
place and then we will get the sorted
subarray A[ 1…j ]
pick up
Sorted order Unsorted order
11
14. Insertion Sort Algorithm
Algorithm: INSERTION-SORT(A)
Input: A : A sequence of n numbers
Output: A : A sorted sequence in increasing order of array A
for j = 2 to length(A)
key = A[j]
//Insert A[j] into the sorted sequence A[1…j-1]
i = j-1
while i > 0 and A[i] > key
A[i+1] = A[i]
i = i-1
A[i+1] = key
14
16. Insertion Sort Analysis (cont.)
INSERTION-SORT(A) cost times
1. for j = 2 to length(A) c1 n
2. key = A[j] c2 n-1
3. //Insert A[j] into the sorted sequence A[1…j-1] 0 n-1
4. i = j-1 c4 n-1
n
5. while i > 0 and A[i] > key c5 tj
j 2
n
6. A[i+1] = A[i] c6 (t j 1)
j 2
n
7. i = i-1 c7 (t j 1)
j 2
8. A[i+1] = key c8 n-1
16
17. Analysis of Insertion Sort (Cont.)
To Compute the total running time of INSERTION-
SORT, T ( n )
n
T (n) c1 n c2 (n 1) 0(n 1) c4 (n 1) c5 tj
j 2
n n
c6 (t j 1) c7 (t j 1) c8 ( n 1)
j 2 j 2
17
18. Analysis of Insertion Sort (Cont.)
Best – case
If input array is already sorted. Thus tj = 1
T(n) = c1n+c2(n-1)+(0)(n-1)+c4(n-1)+c5(n-1)+c6(0)+c7(0)+c8(n-1)
= (c1+c2+c3+c4+c5+c8)n - (c2+c3+c4+c5+c8)
an + b for constant a and b
Base-case running time of INSERTION-SORT is (n)
18
19. Analysis of Insertion Sort (Cont.)
Worse – case
If input array is in reverse sorted order. Thus tj = j
n(n 1)
T (n) c1 n c2 (n 1) c4 (n 1) c5 1
2
(n 1) n (n 1) n
c6 c7 c8 ( n 1)
2 2
c5 c6 c6 2 c5 c6 c7
T (n) n c1 c2 c4 c8 n
2 2 2 2 2 2
(c2 c4 c5 c8 ) an
2
bn c
for constant a, b and c
2
Worse-case running time of INSERTION-SORT is (n )
19
20. Analysis of Insertion Sort (Cont.)
Worse – case (Cont.)
If input array is in reverse sorted order. Thus tj = j
n
n n n(n 1)
n(n 1) j
tj j 1 j 1
2
j 2 j 2 2
n n
(n 1)(( n 1) 1) (n 1) n
(t j 1) (j 1) (1 1)
j 2 j 2 2 2
20
22. Divide-and-Conquer Approach
The divide-and-conquer approach involves
three steps at each level of the recursion:
Divide the problem into a number of sub-problems
that are similar to the original problem but smaller
in size.
Conquer the sub-problems by solving them
recursively.
Combine the solution of subproblems into the
solution for the original problem.
22
23. Merge Sort
The Merge Sort algorithm closely follows the
divide-and-conquer approach. It operates as
follows,
Divide: Divide the n-element sequence to be
sorted into two subsequences of n/2 elements
each.
Conquer: Sort the two subsequences recursively
using merge sort
Combine: Merge the two sorted subsequences to
produce the sorted solution.
23
24. Merge Sort (Cont.)
The recursion “bottom out” when the
sequence to be sorted has length 1, in which
case there is no work to be done, since every
sequence of length 1 is already in sorted
order.
24
27. Merge Sort Algorithm
Algorithm MergeSort( A, p, q )
Input: A: a sequence of n elements
p: the beginning index of A
q: the last index of A
Output: A: a sorted sequence of n elements
if(p < q) then
r = floor((p+q)/2)
MergeSort(A,p,r)
MergeSort(A,r+1,q)
Merge(A,p,r,q)
27
28. Algo Merge(A,p,r,q)
Input: A, p, r, q : a sorted subsequences A[p…r] and
A[r+1…q]
Output: A: a sorted sequence A[p…q]
let i=p, k=p, j=r+1
while (i ≤ r) and (j ≤ q)
if (A[i] ≤ A[j]) then
B[k] = A[i]
k++
i++
else
B[k] = A[j]
k=k+1
j=j+1
if (i>r) then /* If the maximum value of left subsequence is less than the right subsequence */
while(j ≤ q)
B[k] = A[j]
k++
j++
else if(j > q) then /* If the maximum value of left subsequence is gather than the right subsequence */
while(i ≤ r)
B[k] = A[i]
k++
i++
for k = p to q
A[k] = b[k]
28
29. Merge Sort Analysis
The best case running time is _ (n log n)_
The worst case running time is _ O(n log n) _
29
30. Quick Sort
Quick Sort, likes merge sort, is based on the
divide-and-conquer approach.
To sort an array A[p…r]
Divide: Partition (rearrange) the array A[p…r] into
two subarray A[p…q -1] and subarray A[q+1…r]
such that:
Each element of A[p…q -1] is less than or equal to A[q]
Each element of A[q+1…r] is greater than A[q]
30
31. Quick Sort (Cont.)
To sort sorting an array A[p…r] (cont.)
Conquer: Sort the two subarray A[p…q -1] and
A[q+1…r] by recursive calls to QuickSort.
Combine: Since the subarrays are sorted in place, no
work is needed to combine them: the entire array
A[p…r] is now sorted.
31
33. Quick Sort Algorithm
Algo QuickSort(A, p, r)
Input: A: A sequence of n numbers
p: The first index of A
r: The last index of A
Output: A: A sorted sequence in increasing order of array A
• Rearrange the subarray
if (p < r) then A[p…r] in place.
• The elements that is less
q = Partition(A,p,r) than A[q] are placed at the
left side of A[q] and
QuickSort(A,p,q-1) • The elements that is
greater than A[q] are placed
QuickSort(A,q+1,r) at the right side of A[q].
33
34. Quick Sort Algorithm (Cont.)
Algo Partition(A, p, r)
Input: A: A sequence of n numbers
p: The first index of A
r: The last index of A
Output: A: The rearranged subarray A[p…r]
key = A[r]
i=p–1
for j = p to r -1
if A[ j ] ≤ key then
i = i+1
exchange A[i] and A[j]
exchange A[i+1] and key
return i+1 34
35. Quick Sort Analysis
The best case running time is _ (n log n)_
The worst case running time is _ O(n2)_
35