This presentation was designed to convey:
1. General research on the search user experience
2. Specific results from usability testing and competitive usability testing
3. Show product managers and designers which design patterns and solutions will help improve lead conversions and maintain a good user experience
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Lead conversions: It's all in the detail page
1. UX Research Report – Kelley Howell, UX Research
Manager
LEAD CONVERSIONS
IT’S ALL IN THE DETAIL PAGE
2. Introductory remarks
Part of “Understanding Search Experience”
series
Explore a portion of search experience
What, how, and why users do what they do
Use quantitative and qualitative data
3. Goal for part 1 and part 2
What Questions
Close analysis of user
patterns on detail page
What is our baseline
understanding of how
people use the page?
What do people do?
Why Questions
Existing research
Known cognitive
abilities & limitations
shape search behavior
Specific goals, needs,
desires, values
4. All in the detail(s page)
What’s our ultimate goal for our site?
Marketplace: we drive consumer leads to
customers
Do this by driving consumers to detail page
Do we have other goals?
Important to keep in our goals in mind, even
while we study our users and their goals
19. Research lit – a backgrounder (and
caveat)
Patterns of user behavior – a demo
Describing and explaining user behavior
Part 2:
20. Existing research
Ground in existing body of research on how
people search
Historically, tended to ignore behavior on content
page
Seen as less important than search mechanics
Saw decision-making at detail page level as
rational
21. Result?
Viewed web as a place for brochures
Or, likened them to department or specialty
stores
Static flow diagrams to conceive of search
process
Didn’t see content as place to influence
conversions
22. Mad men hangover
Lackluster interest in
detail page experience
due to the stick-drive-
convert model
Stick: build brand
awareness
Drive: drive consumers to
retailer
Convert: cross fingers
and hope customer
23. Upshot of the hangover
Tended to ignore development of an online
equivalent to merchandising
24. Hangover: Home as hub
approach
Home as central hub
Categorize activities
and departments to
create secondary
hubs
Design home page to
drive consumers to
those pages
25. Remedy: content-out approach
Valuable content =
core
Figure out where
people are coming
from
Use links along that
path to get people to
the content
26. Detail page: http://goo.gl/i41MQg
117 elements
Content Inventory:
Item
Page Region
Business Need
User Need
Functionality
Module
Global or Local Nav
27. eCommerce & conversion
optimization
Growth of ecommerce sites
End of internet-as-talking-dog era
Rise of UX-as-differentiator
Stick-drive-convert model in decline
Growing body of research on how
to influence consumer behavior
28. Marketplace apps (web and phone)
Marketplace – creates a platform for bringing
buyers and sellers together
Search behavior can be different on
marketplace sites than it is on eCommerce
eCommerce lessons don’t always translate
29. BUT! - still useful
Avg cart abandonment rate:
65.23%
Avg conversion rate: 2.13%
The higher the average order
value (AOV), lower the
product page effectiveness
rate
AOV < $50, effectiveness
rate is 25%.
AOV > $2000, effectiveness
rate is 4-5%
30. Remember: content is king
Detail page is a type of content page
Tended to think of detail page more like a
section in a department store
In a marketplace, we don’t have control over
content
Tended to think of content as reading material
By reconsidering them as content pages, freer
31. Understand what they are doing better and
figuring out why they are doing it
User research
32. Summary of user research, 1
Follow all a similar pattern when first using homes.com:
verifying validity of results is primary goal
When familiar with the site, they don’t worry about verifying
validity. They trust the site already.
Are annoyed by lead form CTAs (verbally); behaviorally,
they use them
New users: Appear to use F pattern for quick skimming
Once engaged, use Z pattern for analyzing
They do not see the string of data at the top of a listing –
price, beds, bath
See photos, but expect more scannable information on
33. Summary of user research, 2
Homes.com is generic name; users suspicious that it
might not yield valid results (want information scent they
can trust)
Users notice local agents, see as positive sign
Users want to know about the area to which they’re
moving
Users don’t notice map search when asked to search in a
specific area
Users are sometimes confused by the contact forms
- lack of verbiage (contact)
- Sometimes confused about variety of contact forms
34. How do we understand the user’s
behavior?
Put user research in context
35. Search basics – a review
Users Not just new to
domain and
technology in
general
New to our site
36. Verify, then trust – search results
How our users behave
1. Perform search
2. Search results: skim and seek information scent
(e.g., search terms, pictures, etc.)
3. Relevancy threshold – when results seem valid
and worth investigating further
4. Back to top
5. Begin second skim
37. Verify, then trust – detail page
A neophyte to our search will continue a
verification process,
Is verifying that it’s worth investigating detail
pages
Repeats a similar process to SRP verification
Scans for information scent to know if on right
track
38. Verify, then trust – detail page
(cont’d)
1. Quick up and down scan of 1 or more page
2. Verifying information scent on detail page
3. If scent is still relevant, will either go back to
beginning of SRP to search in earnest OR
remain on detail, go back to top and
reexamine page.
39. Information scent trumps accuracy
Users always look for clues to see if they’re on
right track
Too few or too many results aren’t an obstacle
Number of clicks isn’t a problem
People stop searching when information scent is
weak
Blocker: strong scent that isn’t verified (distrusts
40. Thrill of the search?
“Search results don’t have to bring you to the
final page. They have to bring you to the page
with even better information.” – Jared Spool
For many users, this sense of getting closer and
closer, more and more information, can produce
a thrill of anticipation that is, in and of itself,
rewarding.
42. Gutenberg Diagram:
How people scan text heavy blocks
Belief that designs that
work with this pattern
can leverage natural
reading “gravity”
patterns
44. F pattern
Jakob Nielsen:
“Eyetracking visualizations show that users often read Web
pages in an F-shaped pattern: two horizontal stripes
followed by a vertical stripe.”
People don’t’ read every word
First two paragraphs get most attention
Scan first few words of first 2 paragraphs, then
drop off
50. Z Pattern
People use it on less reading heavy text
Point #1 (launch point - branding)
Point #2: scans through to way point landing
Center: fallow
Point #3: fallow waypoint
Point #4: eye comes to rest
54. In sum…
1. Detail pages are content pages
2. Design from content out
3. There are well-known patterns people use to
search and engage with results, including
content pages
4. So far, our consumers tend to behave as
expected
56. To help users validate results:
Leave information scent: trigger words, images
Create information hierarchy of most important
trigger words
57. F pattern solutions
Tends to be used on content heavy sites
User scans in vertical line DOWN left side of
page
Looks for key words and points of interest
Gravitates to images and first few words of first
two paragraphs
When they find something interesting, they read
58. Optimizing F pattern scanning
Work with the F pattern
Force user to stop and slow down – come
technique in rhetorical writing
Use eyecatching deign -- a break that forces
people out of the pattern of looking
Provide visually interesting elements that can
people people scanning toward engagement
59. Best Practices
1. Background: separate background to keep
the user's sight within your framework
2. Point #1: prime location for important content,
especially for branding.
3. Point #2: Place next attention grabbing CTA
4. Center of page: slideshow, video, large
image. Use to break up top and bottom
sections
60. Best Practices
1. Point #3: optimize this line with thumbnails,
icons, trail to lead people to final CTA
2. Point #4: Primary CTA because it’s where
user’s eye comes to rest
3. Z pattern can be repeated across page
4. Can extend the Z Pattern throughout the
61. Z Pattern
Good for simple design
Helps organize key elements
Used for good storytelling, to follow path of Z
62. Working with Z pattern content
Complex content that needs to be read won’t
help people skim the information better
Z pattern can bring order and make it easier to
skim over information displayed in chunks.
64. What’s next?
Once user is on the page and we’ve optimized
for F or Z pattern scanning, what’s next?
We have a lot of information, how do we keep
user interested with next level of information
scent?
How do we know what they are looking for?
How do we organize the information
optimally?
We wanted to share what we know about how people use detail pages during the search process. That includes how they use it based on analytics—which can tell us what people do on the site. We also wanted to address what people do on detail pages as part of a broader interaction pattern. Like search, people have certain cognitive abilities and limitations that shape how they interact with our site. People also have goals, desires, and needs that shape how they interact with the site. To understand these, we can turn to existing research on search behavior. We can also get to know our users by interviewing them and observing them while they are engaged in a particular task.
are delivered to the managers, agents, and brokers whose listings we display on the site. Thus, the detail page is of central importance. Much of what we do on the site is designed to drive customers to this page. If our visitors are going to convert, it happens when a user can learn the most about the product or, in this case, the listing
Rate = rental leads submitted/ unique visitors to rent udp
Rate = rental leads submitted on mDot/ unique visitors to rent mDot udp
Rate = rental leads submitted/ unique visitors to rent udp
Rate = for sale leads submitted/ unique visitors to for sale udp
mDot Rate = for sale leads submitted on mDot/ unique visitors to for sale mDot udp
Rate = for sale leads submitted/ unique visitors to for sale udp
Rate = for mobile leads submitted/ total unique visitors on mDot
See stick – convert model of mad men
See stick – convert model of mad men
See stick – convert model of mad men
See stick – convert model of mad men
You’ll remember back when we discussed search behavior. We talked about different categories of users: different levels of technological expertise and different levels of domain expertise. You could be a double novice or double expert or some combination in between.
No matter how expert someone is at using the technology, a neophyte is always going to have to get used to *our* technology.
Which is to say, she’s going to have to figure out how our search works and if it presents the results she’s expecting.
When people are new to *our* technology, they usually engage in a process called “verification”.
They perform a search and then verify that the search is returning desired results.
Enter search query
Quickly skim up and down a search results page looking for an information scent. They look for easy to scan information looking for clues: they’ll look for references to the search term(s) they used. If they wanted are apartments, are they seeing signs that the results are for apartments. Homes for sale?
They reach a relevancy threshold when the quick skim down the page verifies that the results seem worth investigating further
They promptly move back up to the top of results
WHY DO THEY DO THIS? Because their first quick scan down the page was, on their won assessment, too quick.
While at the top, they look more carefully at the results and click into a detail page that looks inviting.
Just as with the search results page, a neophyte to our search will continue a verification process, verifying that moving to the detail level satisfies her expectations. She does this the same way she does upon initial view of the search results page: quickly, looking for clues – an information scent – that she is on the right track.Thus, the initial view of a listing is a quick up and down page scan.
If this property isn’t one she’s interested in, but seems on the right path, she’ll perform the same quick look for an information scent operation on a few more detail pages. Thus, the verification process is in evidence. She’s looking for an information scent. She does this not by carefully reading from top to bottom. Instead, a user will often quickly scan down the page looking for an information sent, asking if the result(s) is relevant.A user will bounce back and forth – pogostick – until she reaches another relevancy threshold, “Yes, these results are worth investigating more deeply.” (Or, no, I’m going somewhere else)
Once she’s determined that the results are worth looking at, the user will look more earnestly and purposefully, taking in the information on the page.
What do we know about what works based on research?
A good information scent trumps accuracy:Users will always look for a clue that they are on the right track. They don’t turn away from results because there are too few or too many. They don’t turn away because it’s taking too many clicks. Rather, they turn away when the information scent is weak. If a user thinks that clicking a link will bring her to more relevant results, she’s likely to keep looking. Thus, what matters is that leave users an information scent use trigger words and/or images. Information hierarchy in the listing details on the search results gallery is crucial. (create hierarchy of the most important signals or trigger words/images: photos, price, city name/neighborhood/zip code) “Search results don’t have to bring you to the final page. They have to bring you to the page with even better information.” – Jared SpoolFor many users, this sense of getting closer and closer, more and more information, can produce a thrill of anticipation that is, in and of itself, rewarding.
Primary optical area located in the top/left
Strong fallow area located in the top/right
Weak fallow area located in the bottom/left
Terminal area located in the bottom/right
The pattern suggests that the eye will sweep across and down the page in a series of horizontal movements called axes of orientation. Each sweep starts a little further from the left edge and moves a little closer to the right edge. The overall movement is for the eye to travel from the primary area to the terminal area and this path is referred to as reading gravity.
Important elements should be placed along the reading gravity path. For example placing logo or headline in the top/left, an image or some important content in the middle, and a call-to-action or contact information in the bottom right.
Designs that follow Gutenberg are said to be in harmony with natural reading gravity.
The z-pattern is good for simple designs with a few key elements that need to be seen. Any storytelling aspect of the design would follow the path of the z.
This technique of "breaking the expectations" of the layout can be useful when you have really long vertical spans of content that feel dull or boring once you scroll past the first couple headlines. By throwing the viewer a curveball, you can keep the users moving around your site by providing visually interesting elements 1000, 2000, even 3000 pixels below the fold
The z-pattern is good for simple designs with a few key elements that need to be seen. Any storytelling aspect of the design would follow the path of the z.
But after we get people to what they are looking for – usually a general search on a city or ZIP – to find, specifically, a home to buy or rent?
How do we provide an information scent for the features in a home when they don’t tell us what they are looking for?
When users provide specific search terms, we can respond to that. But often enough, users don’t want to get too specific – especially early on in the search – for fear of missing out.
How can we help people find the information scent they want, without catering to too narrow interests AND without providing so much information that it’s overwhelming?
How do we create an information hierarchy on a page with so many different details about the home – price, square footage, appliances, previous price, neighborhood, distance from work/family/church, real estate company, previous home value, comparative homes, beds/bath, photos, lot size, flooring type, roof type, heating type, et etc.
GET VIDEO OF BEAR CHASING BIKER